Files
spec-kit/templates/review-template.md
Arun Kumar Thiagarajan 6eb15a7a3e feat: add 5 gstack-inspired lifecycle commands (critique, review, qa, ship, retro)
Add 5 new core command templates inspired by Garry Tan's GStack to complete
the spec-driven development lifecycle:

- /speckit.critique: Dual-lens product + engineering review before implementation
- /speckit.review: Staff-level code review (correctness, security, performance)
- /speckit.qa: Systematic QA testing (browser-driven and CLI modes)
- /speckit.ship: Release automation (pre-flight, changelog, CI, PR creation)
- /speckit.retro: Sprint retrospective with metrics and improvement suggestions

Each command includes:
- Command template in templates/commands/
- Output report template in templates/
- Extension hook support (before_*/after_*)
- YAML frontmatter with prerequisite scripts

Updated README.md workflow from 6 to 11 steps and added CHANGELOG entry.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-01 11:22:57 +05:30

2.0 KiB

Code Review Report: [FEATURE NAME]

Reviewer: AI Agent (Staff Engineer Perspective) Date: [DATE] Feature: [Link to spec.md] Branch: [Feature branch name] Verdict: [ APPROVED / ⚠️ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS / CHANGES REQUIRED]


Executive Summary

[One-paragraph overall assessment of the implementation quality, key strengths, and primary concerns.]


Review Findings

ID Severity File Line(s) Category Finding Recommendation
R001 🔴 Blocker [file] [lines] [category] [description] [fix suggestion]
R002 🟡 Warning [file] [lines] [category] [description] [fix suggestion]
R003 🟢 Suggestion [file] [lines] [category] [description] [fix suggestion]

Categories: Correctness, Security, Performance, Spec Compliance, Error Handling, Test Quality, Architecture


Spec Coverage Matrix

Requirement Status Implementation Notes
FR-001: [requirement] Implemented [notes]
FR-002: [requirement] ⚠️ Partial [what's missing]
FR-003: [requirement] Missing [recommendation]

Coverage: [X]/[Y] requirements implemented ([Z]%)


Test Coverage Assessment

Area Tests Exist? Coverage Gaps
[Module/Feature] / [%] [untested paths]

Metrics Summary

Metric Value
Files reviewed [count]
🔴 Blockers [count]
🟡 Warnings [count]
🟢 Suggestions [count]
Spec coverage [%]
Test coverage [%]

Must Fix (Blockers)

  1. [Action item with specific file and fix description]

Should Fix (Warnings)

  1. [Action item]

Nice to Fix (Suggestions)

  1. [Action item]

Generated by /speckit.review — Staff-level code review for spec-driven development.