# Code Review Report: [FEATURE NAME]

**Reviewer**: AI Agent (Staff Engineer Perspective)
**Date**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
**Branch**: [Feature branch name]
**Verdict**: [✅ APPROVED / ⚠️ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS / ❌ CHANGES REQUIRED]

---

## Executive Summary

[One-paragraph overall assessment of the implementation quality, key strengths, and primary concerns.]

---

## Review Findings

| ID | Severity | File | Line(s) | Category | Finding | Recommendation |
|----|----------|------|---------|----------|---------|----------------|
| R001 | 🔴 Blocker | [file] | [lines] | [category] | [description] | [fix suggestion] |
| R002 | 🟡 Warning | [file] | [lines] | [category] | [description] | [fix suggestion] |
| R003 | 🟢 Suggestion | [file] | [lines] | [category] | [description] | [fix suggestion] |

**Categories**: Correctness, Security, Performance, Spec Compliance, Error Handling, Test Quality, Architecture

---

## Spec Coverage Matrix

| Requirement | Status | Implementation Notes |
|-------------|--------|---------------------|
| FR-001: [requirement] | ✅ Implemented | [notes] |
| FR-002: [requirement] | ⚠️ Partial | [what's missing] |
| FR-003: [requirement] | ❌ Missing | [recommendation] |

**Coverage**: [X]/[Y] requirements implemented ([Z]%)

---

## Test Coverage Assessment

| Area | Tests Exist? | Coverage | Gaps |
|------|-------------|----------|------|
| [Module/Feature] | ✅/❌ | [%] | [untested paths] |

---

## Metrics Summary

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Files reviewed | [count] |
| 🔴 Blockers | [count] |
| 🟡 Warnings | [count] |
| 🟢 Suggestions | [count] |
| Spec coverage | [%] |
| Test coverage | [%] |

---

## Recommended Actions

### Must Fix (Blockers)
1. [Action item with specific file and fix description]

### Should Fix (Warnings)
1. [Action item]

### Nice to Fix (Suggestions)
1. [Action item]

---

*Generated by `/speckit.review` — Staff-level code review for spec-driven development.*