Compare commits
124 Commits
v4.27.0
...
feat/trans
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
168fbefdf7 | ||
|
|
33269c888d | ||
|
|
7f016d0020 | ||
|
|
8b0b72b7b4 | ||
|
|
1c3420335b | ||
|
|
fb02234b59 | ||
|
|
e0dcbcf527 | ||
|
|
75ba8d82e1 | ||
|
|
f3e429d746 | ||
|
|
5ceca3aeb9 | ||
|
|
8e324f60b0 | ||
|
|
8a29f0e319 | ||
|
|
d92ba835fa | ||
|
|
ac90641d83 | ||
|
|
9868437f10 | ||
|
|
d563266b97 | ||
|
|
3efcfd54d4 | ||
|
|
31e44b110e | ||
|
|
2a18c33c7f | ||
|
|
147d444aeb | ||
|
|
8d300dadf3 | ||
|
|
34e75bef96 | ||
|
|
b7a34b4fc6 | ||
|
|
ffcb4d4bf2 | ||
|
|
3f6b67443d | ||
|
|
85a0d83fc5 | ||
|
|
3f7e19a098 | ||
|
|
23df54c955 | ||
|
|
0fdbca73fc | ||
|
|
5d7d7c9015 | ||
|
|
dd2b4ed5ac | ||
|
|
8f40576681 | ||
|
|
fe86675c5f | ||
|
|
8211d2daff | ||
|
|
1676f5189e | ||
|
|
3c3d58939f | ||
|
|
2d954d3481 | ||
|
|
f7c2a4fb6c | ||
|
|
9df28d5313 | ||
|
|
2cf322ee0d | ||
|
|
5dc4043577 | ||
|
|
a72b790f3b | ||
|
|
55f834954f | ||
|
|
dcebe91d5e | ||
|
|
ce5b37b628 | ||
|
|
c079c28dc4 | ||
|
|
4fc8e752a6 | ||
|
|
bcb3728f88 | ||
|
|
f7963cbaa9 | ||
|
|
e9dd4e7beb | ||
|
|
a80ea150f2 | ||
|
|
c7fc5d3606 | ||
|
|
a2ddf926e5 | ||
|
|
62ccccdc9e | ||
|
|
cce7a758a6 | ||
|
|
5efbff3227 | ||
|
|
a7038d43d1 | ||
|
|
9afe4fbdaf | ||
|
|
bfaaa0ee11 | ||
|
|
df57d772ca | ||
|
|
c445962f25 | ||
|
|
e44271b191 | ||
|
|
49e489701e | ||
|
|
8619006c16 | ||
|
|
a72f1cc3bd | ||
|
|
c6dc345b95 | ||
|
|
1062cad9bc | ||
|
|
3367fa18f7 | ||
|
|
849e42871a | ||
|
|
4d252626de | ||
|
|
5d81c75f4d | ||
|
|
47b014efa1 | ||
|
|
aa0e9f9bc4 | ||
|
|
d1bed26e5d | ||
|
|
0089110e3c | ||
|
|
dcb36a9b44 | ||
|
|
d0a8c581af | ||
|
|
4fd72a6dcb | ||
|
|
f51697f09a | ||
|
|
2cea37aa8c | ||
|
|
00285c9250 | ||
|
|
e24b6f84fd | ||
|
|
2c20531883 | ||
|
|
0723eed881 | ||
|
|
bddb5b05c4 | ||
|
|
3621c330e6 | ||
|
|
ef32eddcd6 | ||
|
|
9f48c1a869 | ||
|
|
733a085370 | ||
|
|
551e30b65e | ||
|
|
5b8f6cc85d | ||
|
|
afea271e5e | ||
|
|
c39164789d | ||
|
|
f4366f223a | ||
|
|
4ceacedd73 | ||
|
|
6b860bfee4 | ||
|
|
192c6a403b | ||
|
|
f62c05ab0f | ||
|
|
5c588d008e | ||
|
|
e9e541a52e | ||
|
|
24a35ff2c4 | ||
|
|
f32a5fe08a | ||
|
|
3c13c56498 | ||
|
|
97f01f6931 | ||
|
|
c42002f1ea | ||
|
|
b5cbffd608 | ||
|
|
db302309f4 | ||
|
|
c97d76c797 | ||
|
|
cadf8b6750 | ||
|
|
ba9e3f3272 | ||
|
|
412f152547 | ||
|
|
1b86cd4db3 | ||
|
|
c8b26d8eae | ||
|
|
9cf8a6b72b | ||
|
|
908dcd7e9a | ||
|
|
92c9589f7d | ||
|
|
c2b5da7f6e | ||
|
|
a5ffe7b9b2 | ||
|
|
63aabe435e | ||
|
|
2601fa7205 | ||
|
|
92201ae7ed | ||
|
|
97590e5e1d | ||
|
|
746ba573fa | ||
|
|
339745c3f3 |
16
.github/workflows/discord.yaml
vendored
Normal file
16
.github/workflows/discord.yaml
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
name: Discord Notification
|
||||
|
||||
on: [pull_request, release, create, delete, issue_comment, pull_request_review, pull_request_review_comment]
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
notify:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Notify Discord
|
||||
uses: sarisia/actions-status-discord@v1
|
||||
if: always()
|
||||
with:
|
||||
webhook: ${{ secrets.DISCORD_WEBHOOK }}
|
||||
status: ${{ job.status }}
|
||||
title: "Triggered by ${{ github.event_name }}"
|
||||
color: 0x5865F2
|
||||
122
.github/workflows/promote-to-stable.yml
vendored
Normal file
122
.github/workflows/promote-to-stable.yml
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
||||
name: Promote to Stable
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
workflow_dispatch:
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
version_bump:
|
||||
description: 'Version bump type'
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
default: 'minor'
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- patch
|
||||
- minor
|
||||
- major
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
promote:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
contents: write
|
||||
pull-requests: write
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Checkout repository
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Setup Node.js
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: '20'
|
||||
registry-url: 'https://registry.npmjs.org'
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Configure Git
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git config --global user.name "github-actions[bot]"
|
||||
git config --global user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
|
||||
git config --global url."https://x-access-token:${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}@github.com/".insteadOf "https://github.com/"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Switch to stable branch
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git checkout stable
|
||||
git pull origin stable
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Merge main into stable
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git merge origin/main --no-edit
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Install dependencies
|
||||
run: npm ci
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Get current version and calculate new version
|
||||
id: version
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
# Get current version from package.json
|
||||
CURRENT_VERSION=$(node -p "require('./package.json').version")
|
||||
echo "current_version=$CURRENT_VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove beta suffix if present
|
||||
BASE_VERSION=$(echo $CURRENT_VERSION | sed 's/-beta\.[0-9]\+//')
|
||||
echo "base_version=$BASE_VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
|
||||
|
||||
# Calculate new version based on bump type
|
||||
IFS='.' read -ra VERSION_PARTS <<< "$BASE_VERSION"
|
||||
MAJOR=${VERSION_PARTS[0]}
|
||||
MINOR=${VERSION_PARTS[1]}
|
||||
PATCH=${VERSION_PARTS[2]}
|
||||
|
||||
case "${{ github.event.inputs.version_bump }}" in
|
||||
"major")
|
||||
NEW_VERSION="$((MAJOR + 1)).0.0"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
"minor")
|
||||
NEW_VERSION="$MAJOR.$((MINOR + 1)).0"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
"patch")
|
||||
NEW_VERSION="$MAJOR.$MINOR.$((PATCH + 1))"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
*)
|
||||
NEW_VERSION="$BASE_VERSION"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
echo "new_version=$NEW_VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
|
||||
echo "Promoting from $CURRENT_VERSION to $NEW_VERSION"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Update package.json versions
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
# Update main package.json
|
||||
npm version ${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }} --no-git-tag-version
|
||||
|
||||
# Update installer package.json
|
||||
sed -i 's/"version": ".*"/"version": "${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}"/' tools/installer/package.json
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Update package-lock.json
|
||||
run: npm install --package-lock-only
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Commit stable release
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git add .
|
||||
git commit -m "release: promote to stable ${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}
|
||||
|
||||
- Promote beta features to stable release
|
||||
- Update version from ${{ steps.version.outputs.current_version }} to ${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}
|
||||
- Automated promotion via GitHub Actions"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Push stable release
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git remote set-url origin https://x-access-token:${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git
|
||||
git push origin stable
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Switch back to main
|
||||
run: git checkout main
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Summary
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
echo "🎉 Successfully promoted to stable!"
|
||||
echo "📦 Version: ${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}"
|
||||
echo "🚀 The stable release will be automatically published to NPM via semantic-release"
|
||||
echo "✅ Users running 'npx bmad-method install' will now get version ${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}"
|
||||
3
.github/workflows/release.yaml
vendored
3
.github/workflows/release.yaml
vendored
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: Release
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- main
|
||||
- stable
|
||||
workflow_dispatch:
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
version_type:
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- name: Setup Node.js
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: '18'
|
||||
node-version: '20'
|
||||
cache: npm
|
||||
registry-url: https://registry.npmjs.org
|
||||
- name: Install dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
41
.gitignore
vendored
41
.gitignore
vendored
@@ -1,30 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# Node modules
|
||||
# Dependencies
|
||||
node_modules/
|
||||
pnpm-lock.yaml
|
||||
bun.lock
|
||||
deno.lock
|
||||
pnpm-workspace.yaml
|
||||
package-lock.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Logs
|
||||
logs
|
||||
logs/
|
||||
*.log
|
||||
npm-debug.log*
|
||||
|
||||
# Build output
|
||||
build/*.txt
|
||||
web-bundles/
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment variables
|
||||
.env
|
||||
|
||||
# System files
|
||||
.DS_Store
|
||||
Thumbs.db
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment variables
|
||||
.env
|
||||
# Development tools and configs
|
||||
.prettierignore
|
||||
.prettierrc
|
||||
.husky/
|
||||
|
||||
CLAUDE.md
|
||||
.ai/*
|
||||
test-project-install/*
|
||||
sample-project/*
|
||||
.claude
|
||||
# IDE and editor configs
|
||||
.windsurf/
|
||||
.trae/
|
||||
.bmad*/.cursor/
|
||||
|
||||
# AI assistant files
|
||||
CLAUDE.md
|
||||
.ai/*
|
||||
.claude
|
||||
.gemini
|
||||
|
||||
# Project-specific
|
||||
.bmad-core
|
||||
.bmad-creator-tools
|
||||
.gemini
|
||||
.bmad*/.cursor/
|
||||
web-bundles/
|
||||
test-project-install/*
|
||||
sample-project/*
|
||||
flattened-codebase.xml
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Run lint-staged to format and lint YAML files
|
||||
npx lint-staged
|
||||
@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Dependencies
|
||||
node_modules/
|
||||
package-lock.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Build outputs
|
||||
dist/
|
||||
|
||||
# Generated files
|
||||
*.log
|
||||
*.lock
|
||||
|
||||
# BMad core files (have their own formatting)
|
||||
bmad-core/**/*.md
|
||||
|
||||
# Specific files that need custom formatting
|
||||
.roomodes
|
||||
CHANGELOG.md
|
||||
|
||||
# IDE files
|
||||
.vscode/
|
||||
.idea/
|
||||
23
.prettierrc
23
.prettierrc
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"printWidth": 100,
|
||||
"tabWidth": 2,
|
||||
"useTabs": false,
|
||||
"semi": true,
|
||||
"singleQuote": false,
|
||||
"quoteProps": "as-needed",
|
||||
"trailingComma": "es5",
|
||||
"bracketSpacing": true,
|
||||
"bracketSameLine": false,
|
||||
"arrowParens": "always",
|
||||
"proseWrap": "preserve",
|
||||
"endOfLine": "lf",
|
||||
"overrides": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"files": "*.md",
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"proseWrap": "preserve",
|
||||
"printWidth": 120
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,18 +1,21 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"branches": ["main"],
|
||||
"branches": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "main",
|
||||
"prerelease": "beta",
|
||||
"channel": "beta"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "stable",
|
||||
"channel": "latest"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"plugins": [
|
||||
"@semantic-release/commit-analyzer",
|
||||
"@semantic-release/release-notes-generator",
|
||||
"@semantic-release/changelog",
|
||||
"@semantic-release/npm",
|
||||
"./tools/semantic-release-sync-installer.js",
|
||||
[
|
||||
"@semantic-release/git",
|
||||
{
|
||||
"assets": ["package.json", "package-lock.json", "tools/installer/package.json", "CHANGELOG.md"],
|
||||
"message": "chore(release): ${nextRelease.version} [skip ci]\n\n${nextRelease.notes}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"@semantic-release/github"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
8
.vscode/settings.json
vendored
8
.vscode/settings.json
vendored
@@ -1,10 +1,4 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"chat.agent.enabled": true,
|
||||
"chat.agent.maxRequests": 15,
|
||||
"github.copilot.chat.agent.runTasks": true,
|
||||
"chat.mcp.discovery.enabled": true,
|
||||
"github.copilot.chat.agent.autoFix": true,
|
||||
"chat.tools.autoApprove": false,
|
||||
"cSpell.words": [
|
||||
"Agentic",
|
||||
"atlasing",
|
||||
@@ -47,4 +41,4 @@
|
||||
"Trae",
|
||||
"VNET"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
404
CHANGELOG.md
404
CHANGELOG.md
@@ -1,393 +1,539 @@
|
||||
# [4.27.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.26.0...v4.27.0) (2025-07-06)
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.36.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.36.1...v4.36.2) (2025-08-10)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* readme consolidation and version bumps ([0a61d3d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0a61d3de4af880f6e3bf934a92b1827754ed8ce6))
|
||||
- align installer dependencies with root package versions for ESM compatibility ([#420](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/420)) ([3f6b674](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3f6b67443d61ae6add98656374bed27da4704644))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.36.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.36.0...v4.36.1) (2025-08-09)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- update Node.js version to 20 in release workflow and reduce Discord spam ([3f7e19a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3f7e19a098155341a2b89796addc47b0623cb87a))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.36.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.35.3...v4.36.0) (2025-08-09)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* big improvement to advanced elicitation ([1bc9960](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1bc9960808098fba6b43850311799022319df841))
|
||||
* experimental doc creator v2 and template system ([b785371](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b78537115da06b01e140833fd1d73950c7f2e41f))
|
||||
* Massive improvement to the brainstorming task! ([9f53caf](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9f53caf4c6f9c67195b1aae14d54987f81d76e07))
|
||||
* WIP create-docv2 ([c107af0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c107af05984718c1af2cf80118353e8d2e6f906f))
|
||||
- modularize flattener tool into separate components with improved project root detection ([#417](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/417)) ([0fdbca7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0fdbca73fc60e306109f682f018e105e2b4623a2))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.35.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.35.2...v4.35.3) (2025-08-06)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- doc location improvement ([1676f51](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1676f5189ed057fa2d7facbd6a771fe67cdb6372))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.35.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.35.1...v4.35.2) (2025-08-06)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- npx status check ([f7c2a4f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/f7c2a4fb6c454b17d250b85537129b01ffee6b85))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.35.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.35.0...v4.35.1) (2025-08-06)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- npx hanging commands ([2cf322e](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2cf322ee0d9b563a4998c72b2c5eab259594739b))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.35.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.34.0...v4.35.0) (2025-08-04)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- add qwen-code ide support to bmad installer. ([#392](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/392)) ([a72b790](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a72b790f3be6c77355511ace2d63e6bec4d751f1))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.34.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.33.1...v4.34.0) (2025-08-03)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- add KiloCode integration support to BMAD installer ([#390](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/390)) ([dcebe91](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/dcebe91d5ea68e69aa27183411a81639d444efd7))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.33.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.33.0...v4.33.1) (2025-07-29)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- dev agent yaml syntax for develop-story command ([#362](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/362)) ([bcb3728](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/bcb3728f8868c0f83bca3d61fbd7e15c4e114526))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.33.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.32.0...v4.33.0) (2025-07-28)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- version bump ([e9dd4e7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e9dd4e7beb46d0c80df0cd65ae02d1867a56d7c1))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.32.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.31.0...v4.32.0) (2025-07-27)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- Add package-lock.json to fix GitHub Actions dependency resolution ([cce7a75](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/cce7a758a632053e26d143b678eb7963599b432d))
|
||||
- GHA fix ([62ccccd](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/62ccccdc9e85f8621f63f99bd1ce0d14abe09783))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- Overhaul and Enhance 2D Unity Game Dev Expansion Pack ([#350](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/350)) ([a7038d4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a7038d43d18246f6aef175aa89ba059b7c94f61f))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.31.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.30.4...v4.31.0) (2025-07-20)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- enhanced user guide with better diagrams ([c445962](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c445962f259cd7d84c47a896e7fda99e83a30c8d))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- Installation includes a getting started user guide with detailed mermaid diagram ([df57d77](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/df57d772cac9f9010811e7e86a6433a0fe636a45))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.30.4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.30.3...v4.30.4) (2025-07-19)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- docs ([8619006](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/8619006c16731b99fa36b434d209a0c2caf2d998))
|
||||
- lint fix ([49e4897](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/49e489701e55feac481806740ea54bebef042fba))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.30.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.30.2...v4.30.3) (2025-07-19)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- improve code in the installer to be more memory efficient ([849e428](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/849e42871ab845098fd196217bce83e43c736b8a))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.30.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.30.1...v4.30.2) (2025-07-17)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- remove z2 ([dcb36a9](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/dcb36a9b44b6644f6b2723c9067abaa9b0bc1999))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.30.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.30.0...v4.30.1) (2025-07-15)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- added logo to installer, because why not... ([2cea37a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2cea37aa8c1924ddf5aa476f4c312837f2615a70))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.30.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.7...v4.30.0) (2025-07-15)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- installer is now VERY clear about IDE selection being a multiselect ([e24b6f8](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e24b6f84fd9e4ff4b99263019b5021ca2b145b2f))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.6...v4.29.7) (2025-07-14)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- bundle build ([0723eed](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0723eed88140e76146dfbfdddd49afe86e8522ee))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.5...v4.29.6) (2025-07-14)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- improve agent task folowing in agressing cost saving ide model combos ([3621c33](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3621c330e65f328e7326f93a5fe27e65b08907e7))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.4...v4.29.5) (2025-07-14)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- windows regex issue ([9f48c1a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9f48c1a869a9cc54fb5e7d899c2af7a5cef70e10))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.3...v4.29.4) (2025-07-14)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- empty .roomodes, support Windows-style newlines in YAML block regex ([#311](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/311)) ([551e30b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/551e30b65e1f04386f0bd0193f726828df684d5b))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.2...v4.29.3) (2025-07-13)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- annoying YAML lint error ([afea271](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/afea271e5e3b14a0da497e241b6521ba5a80b85b))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.1...v4.29.2) (2025-07-13)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- add readme note about discord joining issues ([4ceaced](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/4ceacedd7370ea80181db0d66cf8da8dcbfdd109))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.29.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.29.0...v4.29.1) (2025-07-13)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- brianstorming facilitation output ([f62c05a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/f62c05ab0f54e6c26c67cd9ac11200b172d11076))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.29.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.28.0...v4.29.0) (2025-07-13)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- Claude Code slash commands for Tasks and Agents! ([e9e541a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e9e541a52e45f6632b2f8c91d10e39c077c1ecc9))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.28.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.6...v4.28.0) (2025-07-12)
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- bmad-master can load kb properly ([3c13c56](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3c13c564988f9750e043939dd770aea4196a7e7a))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.5...v4.27.6) (2025-07-08)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- installer improvement ([db30230](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/db302309f42da49daa309b5ba1a625c719e5bb14))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.4...v4.27.5) (2025-07-08)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- installer for github copilot asks follow up questions right away now so it does not seem to hang, and some minor doc improvements ([cadf8b6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/cadf8b6750afd5daa32eb887608c614584156a69))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.3...v4.27.4) (2025-07-07)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- doc updates ([1b86cd4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1b86cd4db3644ca2b2b4a94821cc8b5690d78e0a))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.2...v4.27.3) (2025-07-07)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- remove test zoo folder ([908dcd7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/908dcd7e9afae3fd23cd894c0d09855fc9c42d0e))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.1...v4.27.2) (2025-07-07)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- improve output ([a5ffe7b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a5ffe7b9b209ae02a9d97adf60fe73c0bc9701e4))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.27.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.27.0...v4.27.1) (2025-07-07)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- build web bundles with new file extension includsion ([92201ae](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/92201ae7ede620ec09b4764edaed97be42a3b78f))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.27.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.26.0...v4.27.0) (2025-07-06)
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
- readme consolidation and version bumps ([0a61d3d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0a61d3de4af880f6e3bf934a92b1827754ed8ce6))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- big improvement to advanced elicitation ([1bc9960](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1bc9960808098fba6b43850311799022319df841))
|
||||
- experimental doc creator v2 and template system ([b785371](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b78537115da06b01e140833fd1d73950c7f2e41f))
|
||||
- Massive improvement to the brainstorming task! ([9f53caf](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9f53caf4c6f9c67195b1aae14d54987f81d76e07))
|
||||
- WIP create-docv2 ([c107af0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c107af05984718c1af2cf80118353e8d2e6f906f))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.26.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.25.1...v4.26.0) (2025-07-06)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* **trae:** add support for trae ide integration ([#298](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/298)) ([fae0f5f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/fae0f5ff73a603dc1aacc29f184e2a4138446524))
|
||||
- **trae:** add support for trae ide integration ([#298](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/298)) ([fae0f5f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/fae0f5ff73a603dc1aacc29f184e2a4138446524))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.25.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.25.0...v4.25.1) (2025-07-06)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* spelling errors in documentation. ([#297](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/297)) ([47b9d9f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/47b9d9f3e87be62c8520ed6cb0048df727a9534f))
|
||||
- spelling errors in documentation. ([#297](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/297)) ([47b9d9f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/47b9d9f3e87be62c8520ed6cb0048df727a9534f))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.25.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.6...v4.25.0) (2025-07-05)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* update web bundles ([42684e6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/42684e68af4396797962f3f851147523a6741608))
|
||||
|
||||
- update web bundles ([42684e6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/42684e68af4396797962f3f851147523a6741608))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* improvements to agent task usage, sm story drafting, dev implementation, qa review process, and addition of a new sm independant review of a draft story ([2874a54](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2874a54a9b25b48c199b2e9dc63a9555e716c636))
|
||||
- improvements to agent task usage, sm story drafting, dev implementation, qa review process, and addition of a new sm independant review of a draft story ([2874a54](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2874a54a9b25b48c199b2e9dc63a9555e716c636))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.5...v4.24.6) (2025-07-04)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* version bump and web build fix ([1c845e5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1c845e5b2c77a77d887d8216152ba09110c72e40))
|
||||
- version bump and web build fix ([1c845e5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1c845e5b2c77a77d887d8216152ba09110c72e40))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.4...v4.24.5) (2025-07-04)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* yaml standardization in files and installer actions ([094f9f3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/094f9f3eabf563c9a89ecaf360fed63386b46ed4))
|
||||
- yaml standardization in files and installer actions ([094f9f3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/094f9f3eabf563c9a89ecaf360fed63386b46ed4))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.3...v4.24.4) (2025-07-04)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* documentation updates ([2018ad0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2018ad07c7d4c68efb3c24d85ac7612942c6df9c))
|
||||
- documentation updates ([2018ad0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2018ad07c7d4c68efb3c24d85ac7612942c6df9c))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.2...v4.24.3) (2025-07-04)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* update YAML library from 'yaml' to 'js-yaml' in resolveExpansionPackCoreAgents for consistency ([#295](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/295)) ([03f30ad](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/03f30ad28b282fbb4fa5a6ed6b57d0327218cce0))
|
||||
- update YAML library from 'yaml' to 'js-yaml' in resolveExpansionPackCoreAgents for consistency ([#295](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/295)) ([03f30ad](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/03f30ad28b282fbb4fa5a6ed6b57d0327218cce0))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.1...v4.24.2) (2025-07-03)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* version bump and restore dist folder ([87c451a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/87c451a5c3161fbc86f88619a2bfcfc322eb247e))
|
||||
- version bump and restore dist folder ([87c451a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/87c451a5c3161fbc86f88619a2bfcfc322eb247e))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.24.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.24.0...v4.24.1) (2025-07-03)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* centralized yamlExtraction function and all now fix character issues for windows ([e2985d6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e2985d6093136575e8d8c91ce53c82abc4097de6))
|
||||
* filtering extension stripping logic update ([405954a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/405954ad924d8bd66f94c918643f6e9c091d4d09))
|
||||
* standardize on file extension .yaml instead of a mix of yml and yaml ([a4c0b18](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a4c0b1839d12d2ad21b7949aa30f4f7d82ec6c9c))
|
||||
- centralized yamlExtraction function and all now fix character issues for windows ([e2985d6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e2985d6093136575e8d8c91ce53c82abc4097de6))
|
||||
- filtering extension stripping logic update ([405954a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/405954ad924d8bd66f94c918643f6e9c091d4d09))
|
||||
- standardize on file extension .yaml instead of a mix of yml and yaml ([a4c0b18](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a4c0b1839d12d2ad21b7949aa30f4f7d82ec6c9c))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.24.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.23.0...v4.24.0) (2025-07-02)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* corrected cursor agent update instructions ([84e394a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/84e394ac11136d9cf8164cefc9ca8e298e8ef0ec))
|
||||
|
||||
- corrected cursor agent update instructions ([84e394a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/84e394ac11136d9cf8164cefc9ca8e298e8ef0ec))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* workflow plans introduced, preliminary feature under review ([731589a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/731589aa287c31ea120e232b4dcc07e9790500ff))
|
||||
- workflow plans introduced, preliminary feature under review ([731589a](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/731589aa287c31ea120e232b4dcc07e9790500ff))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.23.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.22.1...v4.23.0) (2025-07-01)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* Github Copilot integration ([#284](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/284)) ([1a4ca4f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1a4ca4ffa630c2d4156bdd7a040d4c2274801757))
|
||||
- Github Copilot integration ([#284](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/284)) ([1a4ca4f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1a4ca4ffa630c2d4156bdd7a040d4c2274801757))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.22.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.22.0...v4.22.1) (2025-06-30)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* update expansion versions ([6905fe7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/6905fe72f6c2abefbfd65729d1be85752130a1d2))
|
||||
- update expansion versions ([6905fe7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/6905fe72f6c2abefbfd65729d1be85752130a1d2))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.22.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.21.2...v4.22.0) (2025-06-30)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* create doc more explicit and readme improvement ([a1b30d9](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a1b30d9341d2ceff79db2c7e178860c5ef0d99e5))
|
||||
- create doc more explicit and readme improvement ([a1b30d9](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a1b30d9341d2ceff79db2c7e178860c5ef0d99e5))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.21.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.21.1...v4.21.2) (2025-06-30)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* improve create-doc task clarity for template execution ([86d5139](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/86d5139aea7097cc5d4ee9da0f7d3e395ce0835e))
|
||||
- improve create-doc task clarity for template execution ([86d5139](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/86d5139aea7097cc5d4ee9da0f7d3e395ce0835e))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.21.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.21.0...v4.21.1) (2025-06-30)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* readme clarifies that the installer handles installs upgrades and expansion installation ([9371a57](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9371a5784f6a6f2ad358a72ea0cde9c980357167))
|
||||
- readme clarifies that the installer handles installs upgrades and expansion installation ([9371a57](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9371a5784f6a6f2ad358a72ea0cde9c980357167))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.21.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.20.0...v4.21.0) (2025-06-30)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* remove unneeded files ([c48f200](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c48f200727384f37a42f4c6b1a946cb90f2445fe))
|
||||
|
||||
- remove unneeded files ([c48f200](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c48f200727384f37a42f4c6b1a946cb90f2445fe))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* massive installer improvement update ([c151bda](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c151bda93833aa310ccc7c0eabcf483376f9e82a))
|
||||
- massive installer improvement update ([c151bda](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c151bda93833aa310ccc7c0eabcf483376f9e82a))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.20.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.19.2...v4.20.0) (2025-06-29)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* Massive documentation refactor, added explanation of the new expanded role of the QA agent that will make your code quality MUCH better. 2 new diagram clearly explain the role of the pre dev ideation cycle (prd and architecture) and the details of how the dev cycle works. ([c881dcc](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c881dcc48ff827ddfe8653aa364a021a66ce66eb))
|
||||
- Massive documentation refactor, added explanation of the new expanded role of the QA agent that will make your code quality MUCH better. 2 new diagram clearly explain the role of the pre dev ideation cycle (prd and architecture) and the details of how the dev cycle works. ([c881dcc](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c881dcc48ff827ddfe8653aa364a021a66ce66eb))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.19.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.19.1...v4.19.2) (2025-06-28)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* docs update and correction ([2408068](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/240806888448bb3a42acfd2f209976d489157e21))
|
||||
- docs update and correction ([2408068](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/240806888448bb3a42acfd2f209976d489157e21))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.19.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.19.0...v4.19.1) (2025-06-28)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* discord link ([2ea806b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2ea806b3af58ad37fcb695146883a9cd3003363d))
|
||||
- discord link ([2ea806b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2ea806b3af58ad37fcb695146883a9cd3003363d))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.19.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.18.0...v4.19.0) (2025-06-28)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* expansion install config ([50d17ed](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/50d17ed65d40f6688f3b6e62732fb2280b6b116e))
|
||||
|
||||
- expansion install config ([50d17ed](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/50d17ed65d40f6688f3b6e62732fb2280b6b116e))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* install for ide now sets up rules also for expansion agents! ([b82978f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b82978fd38ea789a799ccc1373cfb61a2001c1e0))
|
||||
- install for ide now sets up rules also for expansion agents! ([b82978f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b82978fd38ea789a799ccc1373cfb61a2001c1e0))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.18.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.17.0...v4.18.0) (2025-06-28)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* expansion teams can now include core agents and include their assets automatically ([c70f1a0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c70f1a056b0f6e3c805096ee5d27f0a3640fb00c))
|
||||
* remove hardcoding from installer for agents, improve expansion pack installation to its own locations, common files moved to common folder ([95e833b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/95e833beebc3a60f73a7a1c67d534c8eb6bf48fd))
|
||||
- expansion teams can now include core agents and include their assets automatically ([c70f1a0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c70f1a056b0f6e3c805096ee5d27f0a3640fb00c))
|
||||
- remove hardcoding from installer for agents, improve expansion pack installation to its own locations, common files moved to common folder ([95e833b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/95e833beebc3a60f73a7a1c67d534c8eb6bf48fd))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.17.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.16.1...v4.17.0) (2025-06-27)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* add GEMINI.md to agent context files ([#272](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/272)) ([b557570](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b557570081149352e4efbef8046935650f6ecea1))
|
||||
- add GEMINI.md to agent context files ([#272](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/272)) ([b557570](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b557570081149352e4efbef8046935650f6ecea1))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.16.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.16.0...v4.16.1) (2025-06-26)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* remove accidental folder add ([b1c2de1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b1c2de1fb58029f68e021faa90cd5d5faf345198))
|
||||
- remove accidental folder add ([b1c2de1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b1c2de1fb58029f68e021faa90cd5d5faf345198))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.16.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.15.0...v4.16.0) (2025-06-26)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* repo builds all rules sets for supported ides for easy copy if desired ([ea945bb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/ea945bb43f6ea50594910b954c72e79f96a8504c))
|
||||
- repo builds all rules sets for supported ides for easy copy if desired ([ea945bb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/ea945bb43f6ea50594910b954c72e79f96a8504c))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.15.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.14.1...v4.15.0) (2025-06-26)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* Add Gemini CLI Integration ([#271](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/271)) ([44b9d7b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/44b9d7bcb5cbb6de5a15d8f2ec7918d186ac9576))
|
||||
- Add Gemini CLI Integration ([#271](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/271)) ([44b9d7b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/44b9d7bcb5cbb6de5a15d8f2ec7918d186ac9576))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.14.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.14.0...v4.14.1) (2025-06-26)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* add updated web builds ([6dabbcb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/6dabbcb670ef22708db6c01dac82069547ca79d6))
|
||||
- add updated web builds ([6dabbcb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/6dabbcb670ef22708db6c01dac82069547ca79d6))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.14.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.13.0...v4.14.0) (2025-06-25)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* enhance QA agent as senior developer with code review capabilities and major brownfield improvements ([3af3d33](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3af3d33d4a40586479a382620687fa99a9f6a5f7))
|
||||
- enhance QA agent as senior developer with code review capabilities and major brownfield improvements ([3af3d33](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3af3d33d4a40586479a382620687fa99a9f6a5f7))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.13.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.12.0...v4.13.0) (2025-06-24)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* **ide-setup:** add support for Cline IDE and configuration rules ([#262](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/262)) ([913dbec](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/913dbeced60ad65086df6233086d83a51ead81a9))
|
||||
- **ide-setup:** add support for Cline IDE and configuration rules ([#262](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/262)) ([913dbec](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/913dbeced60ad65086df6233086d83a51ead81a9))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.12.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.11.0...v4.12.0) (2025-06-23)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* **dev-agent:** add quality gates to prevent task completion with failing validations ([#261](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/261)) ([45110ff](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/45110ffffe6d29cc08e227e22a901892185dfbd2))
|
||||
- **dev-agent:** add quality gates to prevent task completion with failing validations ([#261](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/261)) ([45110ff](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/45110ffffe6d29cc08e227e22a901892185dfbd2))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.11.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.10.3...v4.11.0) (2025-06-21)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* resolve web bundles directory path when using relative paths in NPX installer ([5c8485d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/5c8485d09ffec60ad4965ced62f4595890cb7535))
|
||||
|
||||
- resolve web bundles directory path when using relative paths in NPX installer ([5c8485d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/5c8485d09ffec60ad4965ced62f4595890cb7535))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* add markdown-tree integration for document sharding ([540578b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/540578b39d1815e41e11f0e87545de3f09ee54e1))
|
||||
- add markdown-tree integration for document sharding ([540578b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/540578b39d1815e41e11f0e87545de3f09ee54e1))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.10.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.10.2...v4.10.3) (2025-06-20)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* bundle update ([2cf3ba1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2cf3ba1ab8dd7e52584bef16a96e65e7d2513c4f))
|
||||
- bundle update ([2cf3ba1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2cf3ba1ab8dd7e52584bef16a96e65e7d2513c4f))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.10.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.10.1...v4.10.2) (2025-06-20)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* file formatting ([c78a35f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c78a35f547459b07a15d94c827ec05921cd21571))
|
||||
- file formatting ([c78a35f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/c78a35f547459b07a15d94c827ec05921cd21571))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.10.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.10.0...v4.10.1) (2025-06-20)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* SM sometimes would skip the rest of the epic stories, fixed ([1148b32](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1148b32fa97586d2f86d07a70ffbf9bb8c327261))
|
||||
- SM sometimes would skip the rest of the epic stories, fixed ([1148b32](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1148b32fa97586d2f86d07a70ffbf9bb8c327261))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.10.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.9.2...v4.10.0) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* Core Config and doc sharding is now optional in v4 ([ff6112d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/ff6112d6c2f822ed22c75046f5a14f05e36041c2))
|
||||
- Core Config and doc sharding is now optional in v4 ([ff6112d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/ff6112d6c2f822ed22c75046f5a14f05e36041c2))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.9.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.9.1...v4.9.2) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* bad brownfield yml ([09d2ad6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/09d2ad6aea187996d0a2e1dff27d9bf7e3e6dc06))
|
||||
- bad brownfield yml ([09d2ad6](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/09d2ad6aea187996d0a2e1dff27d9bf7e3e6dc06))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.9.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.9.0...v4.9.1) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* dist bundles updated ([d9a989d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/d9a989dbe50da62cf598afa07a8588229c56b69c))
|
||||
- dist bundles updated ([d9a989d](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/d9a989dbe50da62cf598afa07a8588229c56b69c))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.9.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.8.0...v4.9.0) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* dev can use debug log configured in core-config.yaml ([0e5aaf0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0e5aaf07bbc6fd9f2706ea26e35f5f38fd72147a))
|
||||
- dev can use debug log configured in core-config.yaml ([0e5aaf0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0e5aaf07bbc6fd9f2706ea26e35f5f38fd72147a))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.8.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.7.0...v4.8.0) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* installer has fast v4 update option now to keep the bmad method up to date with changes easily without breaking any customizations from the user. The SM and DEV are much more configurable to find epics stories and architectureal information when the prd and architecture are deviant from v4 templates and/or have not been sharded. so a config will give the user the option to configure the SM to use the full large documents or the sharded versions! ([aea7f3c](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/aea7f3cc86e749d25ed18bed761dc2839023b3b3))
|
||||
* prevent double installation when updating v4 ([af0e767](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/af0e767ecf1b91d41f114e1a5d7bf5da08de57d6))
|
||||
* resolve undefined config properties in performUpdate ([0185e01](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0185e012bb579948a4de1ea3950db4e399761619))
|
||||
* update file-manager to properly handle YAML manifest files ([724cdd0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/724cdd07a199cb12b82236ad34ca1a0c61eb43e2))
|
||||
|
||||
- installer has fast v4 update option now to keep the bmad method up to date with changes easily without breaking any customizations from the user. The SM and DEV are much more configurable to find epics stories and architectureal information when the prd and architecture are deviant from v4 templates and/or have not been sharded. so a config will give the user the option to configure the SM to use the full large documents or the sharded versions! ([aea7f3c](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/aea7f3cc86e749d25ed18bed761dc2839023b3b3))
|
||||
- prevent double installation when updating v4 ([af0e767](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/af0e767ecf1b91d41f114e1a5d7bf5da08de57d6))
|
||||
- resolve undefined config properties in performUpdate ([0185e01](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0185e012bb579948a4de1ea3950db4e399761619))
|
||||
- update file-manager to properly handle YAML manifest files ([724cdd0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/724cdd07a199cb12b82236ad34ca1a0c61eb43e2))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* add early v4 detection for improved update flow ([29e7bbf](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/29e7bbf4c5aa7e17854061a5ee695f44324f307a))
|
||||
* add file resolution context for IDE agents ([74d9bb4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/74d9bb4b2b70a341673849a1df704f6eac70c3de))
|
||||
* update web builder to remove IDE-specific properties from agent bundles ([2f2a1e7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2f2a1e72d6a70f8127db6ba58a563d0f289621c3))
|
||||
- add early v4 detection for improved update flow ([29e7bbf](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/29e7bbf4c5aa7e17854061a5ee695f44324f307a))
|
||||
- add file resolution context for IDE agents ([74d9bb4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/74d9bb4b2b70a341673849a1df704f6eac70c3de))
|
||||
- update web builder to remove IDE-specific properties from agent bundles ([2f2a1e7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2f2a1e72d6a70f8127db6ba58a563d0f289621c3))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.7.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.6.3...v4.7.0) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* extensive bmad-kb for web orchestrator to be much more helpful ([e663a11](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e663a1146b89e7b5078d9726649a51ae5624da46))
|
||||
- extensive bmad-kb for web orchestrator to be much more helpful ([e663a11](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e663a1146b89e7b5078d9726649a51ae5624da46))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.6.3](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.6.2...v4.6.3) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* SM fixed file resolution issue in v4 ([61ab116](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/61ab1161e59a92d657ab663082abcaf26729fa6b))
|
||||
- SM fixed file resolution issue in v4 ([61ab116](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/61ab1161e59a92d657ab663082abcaf26729fa6b))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.6.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.6.1...v4.6.2) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* installer upgrade path fixed ([bd6a558](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/bd6a55892906077a700f488bde175b57e846729d))
|
||||
- installer upgrade path fixed ([bd6a558](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/bd6a55892906077a700f488bde175b57e846729d))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.6.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.6.0...v4.6.1) (2025-06-19)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* expansion pack builder now includes proper dependencies from core as needed, and default template file name save added to template llm instructions ([9dded00](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9dded003565879901246885d60787695e0d0b7bd))
|
||||
- expansion pack builder now includes proper dependencies from core as needed, and default template file name save added to template llm instructions ([9dded00](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/9dded003565879901246885d60787695e0d0b7bd))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.6.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.5.1...v4.6.0) (2025-06-18)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* orchestractor yml ([3727cc7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3727cc764a7c7295932ff872e2e5be8b4c4e6859))
|
||||
|
||||
- orchestractor yml ([3727cc7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/3727cc764a7c7295932ff872e2e5be8b4c4e6859))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* removed some templates that are not ready for use ([b03aece](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b03aece79e52cfe9585225de5aff7659293d9295))
|
||||
- removed some templates that are not ready for use ([b03aece](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/b03aece79e52cfe9585225de5aff7659293d9295))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.5.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.5.0...v4.5.1) (2025-06-18)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* docs had some ide specific errors ([a954c7e](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a954c7e24284a6637483a9e47fc63a8f9d7dfbad))
|
||||
- docs had some ide specific errors ([a954c7e](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/a954c7e24284a6637483a9e47fc63a8f9d7dfbad))
|
||||
|
||||
# [4.5.0](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.4.2...v4.5.0) (2025-06-17)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* installer relative path issue for npx resolved ([8b9bda5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/8b9bda5639ec882f1887f20b4610a6c2183042c6))
|
||||
* readme updated to indicate move of web-bundles ([7e9574f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/7e9574f571f41ae5003a1664d999c282dd7398be))
|
||||
* temp disable yml linting ([296c2fb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/296c2fbcbd9ac40b3c68633ba7454aacf1e31204))
|
||||
* update documentation and installer to reflect .roomodes file location in project root ([#236](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/236)) ([bd7f030](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/bd7f03016bfa13e39cb39aedb24db9fccbed18a7))
|
||||
|
||||
- installer relative path issue for npx resolved ([8b9bda5](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/8b9bda5639ec882f1887f20b4610a6c2183042c6))
|
||||
- readme updated to indicate move of web-bundles ([7e9574f](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/7e9574f571f41ae5003a1664d999c282dd7398be))
|
||||
- temp disable yml linting ([296c2fb](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/296c2fbcbd9ac40b3c68633ba7454aacf1e31204))
|
||||
- update documentation and installer to reflect .roomodes file location in project root ([#236](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/issues/236)) ([bd7f030](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/bd7f03016bfa13e39cb39aedb24db9fccbed18a7))
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* bmad the creator expansion with some basic tools for modifying bmad method ([2d61df4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2d61df419ac683f5691b6ee3fab81174f3d2cdde))
|
||||
* can now select different web bundles from what ide agents are installed ([0c41633](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0c41633b07d7dd4d7dda8d3a14d572eac0dcbb47))
|
||||
* installer offers option to install web bundles ([e934769](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e934769a5e35dba99f59b4e2e6bb49131c43a526))
|
||||
* robust installer ([1fbeed7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1fbeed75ea446b0912277cfec376ee34f0b3d853))
|
||||
- bmad the creator expansion with some basic tools for modifying bmad method ([2d61df4](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/2d61df419ac683f5691b6ee3fab81174f3d2cdde))
|
||||
- can now select different web bundles from what ide agents are installed ([0c41633](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/0c41633b07d7dd4d7dda8d3a14d572eac0dcbb47))
|
||||
- installer offers option to install web bundles ([e934769](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/e934769a5e35dba99f59b4e2e6bb49131c43a526))
|
||||
- robust installer ([1fbeed7](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/1fbeed75ea446b0912277cfec376ee34f0b3d853))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.4.2](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.4.1...v4.4.2) (2025-06-17)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
|
||||
* single agent install and team installation support ([18a382b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/18a382baa4e4a82db20affa3525eb951af1081e0))
|
||||
- single agent install and team installation support ([18a382b](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/commit/18a382baa4e4a82db20affa3525eb951af1081e0))
|
||||
|
||||
## [4.4.1](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD/compare/v4.4.0...v4.4.1) (2025-06-17)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
196
CLAUDE.md
Normal file
196
CLAUDE.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
|
||||
# CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
Don't be an ass kisser, don't glaze my donut, keep it to the point. Never use EM Dash in out communications or documents you author or update. Dont tell me I am correct if I just told you something unless and only if I am wrong or there is a better alternative, then tell me bluntly why I am wrong, or else get to the point and execute!
|
||||
|
||||
## Markdown Linting Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
Always follow these markdown linting rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Blank lines around headings**: Always leave a blank line before and after headings
|
||||
- **Blank lines around lists**: Always leave a blank line before and after lists
|
||||
- **Blank lines around code fences**: Always leave a blank line before and after fenced code blocks
|
||||
- **Fenced code block languages**: All fenced code blocks must specify a language (use `text` for plain text)
|
||||
- **Single trailing newline**: Files should end with exactly one newline character
|
||||
- **No trailing spaces**: Remove any trailing spaces at the end of lines
|
||||
|
||||
## BMAD-METHOD Overview
|
||||
|
||||
BMAD-METHOD is an AI-powered Agile development framework that provides specialized AI agents for software development. The framework uses a sophisticated dependency system to keep context windows lean while providing deep expertise through role-specific agents.
|
||||
|
||||
## Essential Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### Build and Validation
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run build # Build all web bundles (agents and teams)
|
||||
npm run build:agents # Build agent bundles only
|
||||
npm run build:teams # Build team bundles only
|
||||
npm run validate # Validate all configurations
|
||||
npm run format # Format all markdown files with prettier
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Development and Testing
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npx bmad-build build # Alternative build command via CLI
|
||||
npx bmad-build list:agents # List all available agents
|
||||
npx bmad-build validate # Validate agent configurations
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Installation Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npx bmad-method install # Install stable release (recommended)
|
||||
npx bmad-method@beta install # Install bleeding edge version
|
||||
npx bmad-method@latest install # Explicit stable installation
|
||||
npx bmad-method@latest update # Update stable installation
|
||||
npx bmad-method@beta update # Update bleeding edge installation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual Publishing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
The project uses a dual publishing strategy with automated promotion:
|
||||
|
||||
**Branch Strategy:**
|
||||
- `main` branch: Bleeding edge development, auto-publishes to `@beta` tag
|
||||
- `stable` branch: Production releases, auto-publishes to `@latest` tag
|
||||
|
||||
**Release Promotion:**
|
||||
1. **Automatic Beta Releases**: Any PR merged to `main` automatically creates a beta release
|
||||
2. **Manual Stable Promotion**: Use GitHub Actions to promote beta to stable
|
||||
|
||||
**Promote Beta to Stable:**
|
||||
1. Go to GitHub Actions tab in the repository
|
||||
2. Select "Promote to Stable" workflow
|
||||
3. Click "Run workflow"
|
||||
4. Choose version bump type (patch/minor/major)
|
||||
5. The workflow automatically:
|
||||
- Merges main to stable
|
||||
- Updates version numbers
|
||||
- Triggers stable release to NPM `@latest`
|
||||
|
||||
**User Experience:**
|
||||
- `npx bmad-method install` → Gets stable production version
|
||||
- `npx bmad-method@beta install` → Gets latest beta features
|
||||
- Team develops on bleeding edge without affecting production users
|
||||
|
||||
### Release and Version Management
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run version:patch # Bump patch version
|
||||
npm run version:minor # Bump minor version
|
||||
npm run version:major # Bump major version
|
||||
npm run release # Semantic release (CI/CD)
|
||||
npm run release:test # Test release configuration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Version Management for Core and Expansion Packs
|
||||
|
||||
#### Bump All Versions (Core + Expansion Packs)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run version:all:major # Major version bump for core and all expansion packs
|
||||
npm run version:all:minor # Minor version bump for core and all expansion packs (default)
|
||||
npm run version:all:patch # Patch version bump for core and all expansion packs
|
||||
npm run version:all # Defaults to minor bump
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Individual Version Bumps
|
||||
|
||||
For BMad Core only:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run version:core:major # Major version bump for core only
|
||||
npm run version:core:minor # Minor version bump for core only
|
||||
npm run version:core:patch # Patch version bump for core only
|
||||
npm run version:core # Defaults to minor bump
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For specific expansion packs:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run version:expansion bmad-creator-tools # Minor bump (default)
|
||||
npm run version:expansion bmad-creator-tools patch # Patch bump
|
||||
npm run version:expansion bmad-creator-tools minor # Minor bump
|
||||
npm run version:expansion bmad-creator-tools major # Major bump
|
||||
|
||||
# Set specific version (old method, still works)
|
||||
npm run version:expansion:set bmad-creator-tools 2.0.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture and Code Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Core System Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
The framework uses a **dependency resolution system** where agents only load the resources they need:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Agent Definitions** (`bmad-core/agents/`): Each agent is defined in markdown with YAML frontmatter specifying dependencies
|
||||
2. **Dynamic Loading**: The build system (`tools/lib/dependency-resolver.js`) resolves and includes only required resources
|
||||
3. **Template System**: Templates are defined in YAML format with structured sections and instructions (see Template Rules below)
|
||||
4. **Workflow Engine**: YAML-based workflows in `bmad-core/workflows/` define step-by-step processes
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Components
|
||||
|
||||
- **CLI Tool** (`tools/cli.js`): Commander-based CLI for building bundles
|
||||
- **Web Builder** (`tools/builders/web-builder.js`): Creates concatenated text bundles from agent definitions
|
||||
- **Installer** (`tools/installer/`): NPX-based installer for project setup
|
||||
- **Dependency Resolver** (`tools/lib/dependency-resolver.js`): Manages agent resource dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### Build System
|
||||
|
||||
The build process:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Reads agent/team definitions from `bmad-core/`
|
||||
2. Resolves dependencies using the dependency resolver
|
||||
3. Creates concatenated text bundles in `dist/`
|
||||
4. Validates configurations during build
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
**`bmad-core/core-config.yaml`** is the heart of the framework configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
- Defines document locations and expected structure
|
||||
- Specifies which files developers should always load
|
||||
- Enables compatibility with different project structures (V3/V4)
|
||||
- Controls debug logging
|
||||
|
||||
## Development Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Adding New Features
|
||||
|
||||
1. **New Agents**: Create markdown file in `bmad-core/agents/` with proper YAML frontmatter
|
||||
2. **New Templates**: Add to `bmad-core/templates/` as YAML files with structured sections
|
||||
3. **New Workflows**: Create YAML in `bmad-core/workflows/`
|
||||
4. **Update Dependencies**: Ensure `dependencies` field in agent frontmatter is accurate
|
||||
|
||||
### Important Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dependency Management**: Always specify minimal dependencies in agent frontmatter to keep context lean
|
||||
- **Template Instructions**: Use YAML-based template structure (see Template Rules below)
|
||||
- **File Naming**: Follow existing conventions (kebab-case for files, proper agent names in frontmatter)
|
||||
- **Documentation**: Update user-facing docs in `docs/` when adding features
|
||||
|
||||
### Template Rules
|
||||
|
||||
Templates use the **BMad Document Template** format (`/Users/brianmadison/dev-bmc/BMAD-METHOD/common/utils/bmad-doc-template.md`) with YAML structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **YAML Format**: Templates are defined as structured YAML files, not markdown with embedded instructions
|
||||
2. **Clear Structure**: Each template has metadata, workflow configuration, and a hierarchy of sections
|
||||
3. **Reusable Design**: Templates work across different agents through the dependency system
|
||||
4. **Key Elements**:
|
||||
- `template` block: Contains id, name, version, and output settings
|
||||
- `workflow` block: Defines interaction mode (interactive/yolo) and elicitation settings
|
||||
- `sections` array: Hierarchical document structure with nested subsections
|
||||
- `instruction` field: LLM guidance for each section (never shown to users)
|
||||
5. **Advanced Features**:
|
||||
- Variable substitution: `{{variable_name}}` syntax for dynamic content
|
||||
- Conditional sections: `condition` field for optional content
|
||||
- Repeatable sections: `repeatable: true` for multiple instances
|
||||
- Agent permissions: `owner` and `editors` fields for access control
|
||||
6. **Clean Output**: All processing instructions are in YAML fields, ensuring clean document generation
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for Claude Code
|
||||
|
||||
- The project uses semantic versioning with automated releases via GitHub Actions
|
||||
- All markdown is formatted with Prettier (run `npm run format`)
|
||||
- Expansion packs in `expansion-packs/` provide domain-specific capabilities
|
||||
- NEVER automatically commit or push changes unless explicitly asked by the user
|
||||
- NEVER include Claude Code attribution or co-authorship in commit messages
|
||||
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ Thank you for considering contributing to this project! This document outlines t
|
||||
|
||||
🆕 **New to GitHub or pull requests?** Check out our [beginner-friendly Pull Request Guide](docs/how-to-contribute-with-pull-requests.md) first!
|
||||
|
||||
📋 **Before contributing**, please read our [Guiding Principles](GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md) to understand the BMad Method's core philosophy and architectural decisions.
|
||||
📋 **Before contributing**, please read our [Guiding Principles](docs/GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md) to understand the BMad Method's core philosophy and architectural decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
Also note, we use the discussions feature in GitHub to have a community to discuss potential ideas, uses, additions and enhancements.
|
||||
|
||||
💬 **Discord Community**: Join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/g6ypHytrCB) for real-time discussions:
|
||||
💬 **Discord Community**: Join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj) for real-time discussions:
|
||||
|
||||
- **#general-dev** - Technical discussions, feature ideas, and development questions
|
||||
- **#bugs-issues** - Bug reports and issue discussions
|
||||
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ By participating in this project, you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Ple
|
||||
|
||||
Please only propose small granular commits! If its large or significant, please discuss in the discussions tab and open up an issue first. I do not want you to waste your time on a potentially very large PR to have it rejected because it is not aligned or deviates from other planned changes. Communicate and lets work together to build and improve this great community project!
|
||||
|
||||
**Important**: All contributions must align with our [Guiding Principles](GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md). Key points:
|
||||
**Important**: All contributions must align with our [Guiding Principles](docs/GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md). Key points:
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep dev agents lean - they need context for coding, not documentation
|
||||
- Web/planning agents can be larger with more complex tasks
|
||||
|
||||
95
README.md
95
README.md
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
|
||||
[](https://nodejs.org)
|
||||
[](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj)
|
||||
|
||||
Foundations in Agentic Agile Driven Development, known as the Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-Driven Development, but it is so much more. Transform any domain with specialized AI expertise: software development, entertainment, creative writing, business strategy to personal wellness just to name a few.
|
||||
Foundations in Agentic Agile Driven Development, known as the Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-Driven Development, yet so much more. Transform any domain with specialized AI expertise: software development, entertainment, creative writing, business strategy to personal wellness just to name a few.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Subscribe to BMadCode on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/@BMadCode?sub_confirmation=1)**
|
||||
|
||||
**[Join our Discord Community](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj)** - A growing community for AI enthusiasts! Get help, share ideas, explore AI agents & frameworks, collaborate on tech projects, enjoy hobbies, and help each other succeed. Whether you're stuck on BMad, building your own agents, or just want to chat about the latest in AI - we're here for you!
|
||||
**[Join our Discord Community](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj)** - A growing community for AI enthusiasts! Get help, share ideas, explore AI agents & frameworks, collaborate on tech projects, enjoy hobbies, and help each other succeed. Whether you're stuck on BMad, building your own agents, or just want to chat about the latest in AI - we're here for you! **Some mobile and VPN may have issue joining the discord, this is a discord issue - if the invite does not work, try from your own internet or another network, or non-VPN.**
|
||||
|
||||
⭐ **If you find this project helpful or useful, please give it a star in the upper right hand corner!** It helps others discover BMad-Method and you will be notified of updates!
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ This two-phase approach eliminates both **planning inconsistency** and **context
|
||||
|
||||
- **[Install and Build software with Full Stack Agile AI Team](#quick-start)** → Quick Start Instruction
|
||||
- **[Learn how to use BMad](docs/user-guide.md)** → Complete user guide and walkthrough
|
||||
- **[See available AI agents](#available-agents)** → Specialized roles for your team
|
||||
- **[See available AI agents](/bmad-core/agents))** → Specialized roles for your team
|
||||
- **[Explore non-technical uses](#-beyond-software-development---expansion-packs)** → Creative writing, business, wellness, education
|
||||
- **[Create my own AI agents](#creating-your-own-expansion-pack)** → Build agents for your domain
|
||||
- **[Create my own AI agents](docs/expansion-packs.md)** → Build agents for your domain
|
||||
- **[Browse ready-made expansion packs](expansion-packs/)** → Game dev, DevOps, infrastructure and get inspired with ideas and examples
|
||||
- **[Understand the architecture](docs/core-architecture.md)** → Technical deep dive
|
||||
- **[Join the community](https://discord.gg/g6ypHytrCB)** → Get help and share ideas
|
||||
- **[Join the community](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj)** → Get help and share ideas
|
||||
|
||||
## Important: Keep Your BMad Installation Updated
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ This single command handles:
|
||||
3. **Upload & configure**: Upload the file and set instructions: "Your critical operating instructions are attached, do not break character as directed"
|
||||
4. **Start Ideating and Planning**: Start chatting! Type `*help` to see available commands or pick an agent like `*analyst` to start right in on creating a brief.
|
||||
5. **CRITICAL**: Talk to BMad Orchestrator in the web at ANY TIME (#bmad-orchestrator command) and ask it questions about how this all works!
|
||||
6. **When to moved to the IDE**: Once you have your PRD, Architecture, optional UX and Briefs - its time to switch over to the IDE to shard your docs, and start implementing the actual code! See the [User guide](docs/user-guide.md) for more details
|
||||
6. **When to move to the IDE**: Once you have your PRD, Architecture, optional UX and Briefs - its time to switch over to the IDE to shard your docs, and start implementing the actual code! See the [User guide](docs/user-guide.md) for more details
|
||||
|
||||
### Alternative: Clone and Build
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -110,6 +110,86 @@ npm run install:bmad # build and install all to a destination folder
|
||||
|
||||
BMad's natural language framework works in ANY domain. Expansion packs provide specialized AI agents for creative writing, business strategy, health & wellness, education, and more. Also expansion packs can expand the core BMad-Method with specific functionality that is not generic for all cases. [See the Expansion Packs Guide](docs/expansion-packs.md) and learn to create your own!
|
||||
|
||||
## Codebase Flattener Tool
|
||||
|
||||
The BMad-Method includes a powerful codebase flattener tool designed to prepare your project files for AI model consumption. This tool aggregates your entire codebase into a single XML file, making it easy to share your project context with AI assistants for analysis, debugging, or development assistance.
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
- **AI-Optimized Output**: Generates clean XML format specifically designed for AI model consumption
|
||||
- **Smart Filtering**: Automatically respects `.gitignore` patterns to exclude unnecessary files
|
||||
- **Binary File Detection**: Intelligently identifies and excludes binary files, focusing on source code
|
||||
- **Progress Tracking**: Real-time progress indicators and comprehensive completion statistics
|
||||
- **Flexible Output**: Customizable output file location and naming
|
||||
|
||||
### Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Basic usage - creates flattened-codebase.xml in current directory
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify custom input directory
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten --input /path/to/source/directory
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten -i /path/to/source/directory
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify custom output file
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten --output my-project.xml
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten -o /path/to/output/codebase.xml
|
||||
|
||||
# Combine input and output options
|
||||
npx bmad-method flatten --input /path/to/source --output /path/to/output/codebase.xml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example Output
|
||||
|
||||
The tool will display progress and provide a comprehensive summary:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
📊 Completion Summary:
|
||||
✅ Successfully processed 156 files into flattened-codebase.xml
|
||||
📁 Output file: /path/to/your/project/flattened-codebase.xml
|
||||
📏 Total source size: 2.3 MB
|
||||
📄 Generated XML size: 2.1 MB
|
||||
📝 Total lines of code: 15,847
|
||||
🔢 Estimated tokens: 542,891
|
||||
📊 File breakdown: 142 text, 14 binary, 0 errors
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The generated XML file contains your project's text-based source files in a structured format that AI models can easily parse and understand, making it perfect for code reviews, architecture discussions, or getting AI assistance with your BMad-Method projects.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Advanced Usage & Options
|
||||
|
||||
- CLI options
|
||||
- `-i, --input <path>`: Directory to flatten. Default: current working directory or auto-detected project root when run interactively.
|
||||
- `-o, --output <path>`: Output file path. Default: `flattened-codebase.xml` in the chosen directory.
|
||||
- Interactive mode
|
||||
- If you do not pass `--input` and `--output` and the terminal is interactive (TTY), the tool will attempt to detect your project root (by looking for markers like `.git`, `package.json`, etc.) and prompt you to confirm or override the paths.
|
||||
- In non-interactive contexts (e.g., CI), it will prefer the detected root silently; otherwise it falls back to the current directory and default filename.
|
||||
- File discovery and ignoring
|
||||
- Uses `git ls-files` when inside a git repository for speed and correctness; otherwise falls back to a glob-based scan.
|
||||
- Applies your `.gitignore` plus a curated set of default ignore patterns (e.g., `node_modules`, build outputs, caches, logs, IDE folders, lockfiles, large media/binaries, `.env*`, and previously generated XML outputs).
|
||||
- Binary handling
|
||||
- Binary files are detected and excluded from the XML content. They are counted in the final summary but not embedded in the output.
|
||||
- XML format and safety
|
||||
- UTF-8 encoded file with root element `<files>`.
|
||||
- Each text file is emitted as a `<file path="relative/path">` element whose content is wrapped in `<![CDATA[ ... ]]>`.
|
||||
- The tool safely handles occurrences of `]]>` inside content by splitting the CDATA to preserve correctness.
|
||||
- File contents are preserved as-is and indented for readability inside the XML.
|
||||
- Performance
|
||||
- Concurrency is selected automatically based on your CPU and workload size. No configuration required.
|
||||
- Running inside a git repo improves discovery performance.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Minimal XML example
|
||||
|
||||
```xml
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<files>
|
||||
<file path="src/index.js"><![CDATA[
|
||||
// your source content
|
||||
]]></file>
|
||||
</files>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation & Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Essential Guides
|
||||
@@ -117,11 +197,10 @@ BMad's natural language framework works in ANY domain. Expansion packs provide s
|
||||
- 📖 **[User Guide](docs/user-guide.md)** - Complete walkthrough from project inception to completion
|
||||
- 🏗️ **[Core Architecture](docs/core-architecture.md)** - Technical deep dive and system design
|
||||
- 🚀 **[Expansion Packs Guide](docs/expansion-packs.md)** - Extend BMad to any domain beyond software development
|
||||
- [IDE Specific Guides available in this folder](docs/agentic-tools/)
|
||||
|
||||
## Support
|
||||
|
||||
- 💬 [Discord Community](https://discord.gg/g6ypHytrCB)
|
||||
- 💬 [Discord Community](https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj)
|
||||
- 🐛 [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/bmadcode/bmad-method/issues)
|
||||
- 💬 [Discussions](https://github.com/bmadcode/bmad-method/discussions)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ agents:
|
||||
- bmad-orchestrator
|
||||
- '*'
|
||||
workflows:
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack
|
||||
- brownfield-service
|
||||
- brownfield-ui
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack
|
||||
- greenfield-service
|
||||
- greenfield-ui
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-service.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-ui.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-service.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-ui.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ agents:
|
||||
- architect
|
||||
- po
|
||||
workflows:
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack
|
||||
- brownfield-service
|
||||
- brownfield-ui
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack
|
||||
- greenfield-service
|
||||
- greenfield-ui
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-service.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-ui.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-service.yaml
|
||||
- greenfield-ui.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ agents:
|
||||
- architect
|
||||
- po
|
||||
workflows:
|
||||
- greenfield-service
|
||||
- brownfield-service
|
||||
- greenfield-service.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-service.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# analyst
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Mary
|
||||
id: analyst
|
||||
@@ -35,35 +51,31 @@ persona:
|
||||
- Maintaining a Broad Perspective - Stay aware of market trends and dynamics
|
||||
- Integrity of Information - Ensure accurate sourcing and representation
|
||||
- Numbered Options Protocol - Always use numbered lists for selections
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (default->architect-checklist)
|
||||
- research {topic}: execute task create-deep-research-prompt for architectural decisions
|
||||
- brainstorm {topic}: Facilitate structured brainstorming session
|
||||
- elicit: list the options under output set of information
|
||||
- document-project: Analyze and document existing project structure comprehensively
|
||||
- create-project-brief: use task create-doc with project-brief-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- perform-market-research: use task create-doc with market-research-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-competitor-analysis: use task create-doc with competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document in progress to current destination file
|
||||
- research-prompt {topic}: execute task create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- brainstorm {topic}: Facilitate structured brainstorming session (run task facilitate-brainstorming-session.md with template brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml)
|
||||
- elicit: run the task advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Business Analyst, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation.md
|
||||
- document-project.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl
|
||||
- brainstorming-output-tmpl
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- bmad-kb.md
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# architect
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- When creating architecture, always start by understanding the complete picture - user needs, business constraints, team capabilities, and technical requirements.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Winston
|
||||
id: architect
|
||||
@@ -34,33 +51,33 @@ persona:
|
||||
- Data-Centric Design - Let data requirements drive architecture
|
||||
- Cost-Conscious Engineering - Balance technical ideals with financial reality
|
||||
- Living Architecture - Design for change and adaptation
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- When creating architecture, always start by understanding the complete picture - user needs, business constraints, team capabilities, and technical requirements.
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- create-full-stack-architecture: use create-doc with fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-backend-architecture: use create-doc with architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-front-end-architecture: use create-doc with front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-brownfield-architecture: use create-doc with brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- document-project: execute the task document-project.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (default->architect-checklist)
|
||||
- research {topic}: execute task create-deep-research-prompt for architectural decisions
|
||||
- research {topic}: execute task create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- shard-prd: run the task shard-doc.md for the provided architecture.md (ask if not found)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Architect, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- document-project.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- architect-checklist
|
||||
- architect-checklist.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,113 +1,107 @@
|
||||
# bmad-master
|
||||
# BMad Master
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML to understand your operating params, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT scan filesystem or load any resources during startup, ONLY when commanded
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT run discovery tasks automatically
|
||||
- CRITICAL: NEVER LOAD {root}/data/bmad-kb.md UNLESS USER TYPES *kb
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: BMad Master
|
||||
id: bmad-master
|
||||
title: BMad Master Task Executor
|
||||
icon: 🧙
|
||||
whenToUse: Use when you need comprehensive expertise across all domains or rapid context switching between multiple agent capabilities
|
||||
whenToUse: Use when you need comprehensive expertise across all domains, running 1 off tasks that do not require a persona, or just wanting to use the same agent for many things.
|
||||
persona:
|
||||
role: Master Task Executor & BMad Method Expert
|
||||
style: Efficient, direct, action-oriented. Executes any BMad task/template/util/checklist with precision
|
||||
identity: Universal executor of all BMad-Method capabilities, directly runs any resource
|
||||
focus: Direct execution without transformation, load resources only when needed
|
||||
core_principles:
|
||||
- Execute any resource directly without persona transformation
|
||||
- Load resources at runtime, never pre-load
|
||||
- Expert knowledge of all BMad resources
|
||||
- Track execution state and guide multi-step plans
|
||||
- Use numbered lists for choices
|
||||
- Expert knowledge of all BMad resources if using *kb
|
||||
- Always presents numbered lists for choices
|
||||
- Process (*) commands immediately, All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- Check for active workflow plan using the utils plan-management
|
||||
- If plan exists: Show brief status - Active plan {workflow} in progress
|
||||
- If plan exists: Suggest next step based on plan
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT scan filesystem or load any resources during startup, ONLY when commanded
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT run discovery tasks automatically
|
||||
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show these listed commands in a numbered list
|
||||
- kb: Toggle KB mode off (default) or on, when on will load and reference the data/bmad-kb and converse with the user answering his questions with this informational resource
|
||||
- kb: Toggle KB mode off (default) or on, when on will load and reference the {root}/data/bmad-kb.md and converse with the user answering his questions with this informational resource
|
||||
- task {task}: Execute task, if not found or none specified, ONLY list available dependencies/tasks listed below
|
||||
- list {task|template|util|checklist|workflow}: List resources by type ONLY from the corresponding dependencies sub item below
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- create-prd-alpha: Execute task create-doc2 with .bmad-core/templates/prd-tmpl2.yaml (EXPERIMENTAL)
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- document-project: execute the task document-project.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (no checklist = ONLY show available checklists listed under dependencies/checklist below)
|
||||
- shard-doc {document} {destination}: run the task shard-doc against the optionally provided document to the specified destination
|
||||
- plan: Execute the task Create workflow plan
|
||||
- plan-status: Show current workflow plan progress
|
||||
- plan-update: Update workflow plan status
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off (default) abd on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
workflow-guidance:
|
||||
- When user asks about workflows, offer: "(Experimental-Feature) Would you like me to create a workflow plan first? (*plan)"
|
||||
- For complex projects, suggest planning before execution
|
||||
- Plan command maps to create-workflow-plan task
|
||||
execution:
|
||||
- NEVER use tools during startup - only announce and wait
|
||||
- Runtime discovery ONLY when user requests specific resources
|
||||
- Workflow: User request → Runtime discovery → Load resource → Execute instructions → Guide inputs → Provide feedback
|
||||
- For workflow requests: Suggest *plan command first for complex projects
|
||||
- Suggest related resources after completion
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-doc2
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
- create-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt
|
||||
- index-docs
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation.md
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- document-project.md
|
||||
- create-next-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt.md
|
||||
- index-docs.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl2
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- plan-management
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- workflow-management
|
||||
- bmad-kb.md
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques.md
|
||||
- elicitation-methods.md
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
workflows:
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack
|
||||
- brownfield-service
|
||||
- brownfield-ui
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack
|
||||
- greenfield-service
|
||||
- greenfield-ui
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack.md
|
||||
- brownfield-service.md
|
||||
- brownfield-ui.md
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack.md
|
||||
- greenfield-service.md
|
||||
- greenfield-ui.md
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- architect-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
- pm-checklist
|
||||
- po-master-checklist
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist
|
||||
- architect-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
- pm-checklist.md
|
||||
- po-master-checklist.md
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist.md
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,11 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# bmad
|
||||
# BMad Web Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML to understand your operating params, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Announce: Introduce yourself as the BMad Orchestrator, explain you can coordinate agents and workflows
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Tell users that all commands start with * (e.g., `*help`, `*agent`, `*workflow`)
|
||||
- Assess user goal against available agents and workflows in this bundle
|
||||
- If clear match to an agent's expertise, suggest transformation with *agent command
|
||||
- If project-oriented, suggest *workflow-guidance to explore options
|
||||
- Load resources only when needed - never pre-load
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: BMad Orchestrator
|
||||
id: bmad-orchestrator
|
||||
@@ -27,20 +51,9 @@ persona:
|
||||
- Always use numbered lists for choices
|
||||
- Process commands starting with * immediately
|
||||
- Always remind users that commands require * prefix
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Announce: Introduce yourself as the BMad Orchestrator, explain you can coordinate agents and workflows
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Tell users that all commands start with * (e.g., *help, *agent, *workflow)
|
||||
- Mention *help shows all available commands and options
|
||||
- Check for active workflow plan using {root}/utils/plan-management.md
|
||||
- "If plan exists: Show 📋 Active plan: {workflow} ({progress}% complete). Use *plan-status for details."
|
||||
- "If plan exists: Suggest next action based on plan progress"
|
||||
- Assess user goal against available agents and workflows in this bundle
|
||||
- If clear match to an agent's expertise, suggest transformation with *agent command
|
||||
- If project-oriented, suggest *workflow-guidance to explore options
|
||||
- Load resources only when needed - never pre-load
|
||||
commands: # All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help, *agent pm)
|
||||
commands: # All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help, *agent pm)
|
||||
help: Show this guide with available agents and workflows
|
||||
chat-mode: Start conversational mode for detailed assistance
|
||||
chat-mode: Start conversational mode for detailed assistance
|
||||
kb-mode: Load full BMad knowledge base
|
||||
status: Show current context, active agent, and progress
|
||||
agent: Transform into a specialized agent (list if name not specified)
|
||||
@@ -58,42 +71,42 @@ commands: # All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help, *agent pm)
|
||||
help-display-template: |
|
||||
=== BMad Orchestrator Commands ===
|
||||
All commands must start with * (asterisk)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Core Commands:
|
||||
*help ............... Show this guide
|
||||
*chat-mode .......... Start conversational mode for detailed assistance
|
||||
*kb-mode ............ Load full BMad knowledge base
|
||||
*status ............. Show current context, active agent, and progress
|
||||
*exit ............... Return to BMad or exit session
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Agent & Task Management:
|
||||
*agent [name] ....... Transform into specialized agent (list if no name)
|
||||
*task [name] ........ Run specific task (list if no name, requires agent)
|
||||
*checklist [name] ... Execute checklist (list if no name, requires agent)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Workflow Commands:
|
||||
*workflow [name] .... Start specific workflow (list if no name)
|
||||
*workflow-guidance .. Get personalized help selecting the right workflow
|
||||
*plan ............... Create detailed workflow plan before starting
|
||||
*plan-status ........ Show current workflow plan progress
|
||||
*plan-update ........ Update workflow plan status
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Other Commands:
|
||||
*yolo ............... Toggle skip confirmations mode
|
||||
*party-mode ......... Group chat with all agents
|
||||
*doc-out ............ Output full document
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== Available Specialist Agents ===
|
||||
[Dynamically list each agent in bundle with format:
|
||||
*agent {id}: {title}
|
||||
When to use: {whenToUse}
|
||||
Key deliverables: {main outputs/documents}]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== Available Workflows ===
|
||||
[Dynamically list each workflow in bundle with format:
|
||||
*workflow {id}: {name}
|
||||
Purpose: {description}]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
💡 Tip: Each agent has unique tasks, templates, and checklists. Switch to an agent to access their capabilities!
|
||||
|
||||
fuzzy-matching:
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +131,6 @@ workflow-guidance:
|
||||
- Understand each workflow's purpose, options, and decision points
|
||||
- Ask clarifying questions based on the workflow's structure
|
||||
- Guide users through workflow selection when multiple options exist
|
||||
- For complex projects, offer to create a workflow plan using create-workflow-plan task
|
||||
- When appropriate, suggest: "Would you like me to create a detailed workflow plan before starting?"
|
||||
- For workflows with divergent paths, help users choose the right path
|
||||
- Adapt questions to the specific domain (e.g., game dev vs infrastructure vs web dev)
|
||||
@@ -126,15 +138,12 @@ workflow-guidance:
|
||||
- When *workflow-guidance is called, start an interactive session and list all available workflows with brief descriptions
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan
|
||||
- kb-mode-interaction
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- kb-mode-interaction.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- bmad-kb.md
|
||||
- elicitation-methods.md
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- plan-management
|
||||
- workflow-management
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- workflow-management.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,11 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# dev
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Read the following full files as these are your explicit rules for development standards for this project - {root}/core-config.yaml devLoadAlwaysFiles list
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT load any other files during startup aside from the assigned story and devLoadAlwaysFiles items, unless user requested you do or the following contradicts
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT begin development until a story is not in draft mode and you are told to proceed
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: James
|
||||
id: dev
|
||||
@@ -14,12 +38,6 @@ agent:
|
||||
whenToUse: "Use for code implementation, debugging, refactoring, and development best practices"
|
||||
customization:
|
||||
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Announce: Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Read the following full files as these are your explicit rules for development standards for this project - {root}/core-config.yaml devLoadAlwaysFiles list
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT load any other files during startup aside from the assigned story and devLoadAlwaysFiles items, unless user requested you do or the following contradicts
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT begin development until a story is not in draft mode and you are told to proceed
|
||||
|
||||
persona:
|
||||
role: Expert Senior Software Engineer & Implementation Specialist
|
||||
style: Extremely concise, pragmatic, detail-oriented, solution-focused
|
||||
@@ -33,25 +51,25 @@ core_principles:
|
||||
- Numbered Options - Always use numbered lists when presenting choices to the user
|
||||
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- run-tests: Execute linting and tests
|
||||
- explain: teach me what and why you did whatever you just did in detail so I can learn. Explain to me as if you were training a junior engineer.
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Developer, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
develop-story:
|
||||
order-of-execution: "Read (first or next) task→Implement Task and its subtasks→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass, then update the task checkbox with [x]→Update story section File List to ensure it lists and new or modified or deleted source file→repeat order-of-execution until complete"
|
||||
story-file-updates-ONLY:
|
||||
- CRITICAL: ONLY UPDATE THE STORY FILE WITH UPDATES TO SECTIONS INDICATED BELOW. DO NOT MODIFY ANY OTHER SECTIONS.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: You are ONLY authorized to edit these specific sections of story files - Tasks / Subtasks Checkboxes, Dev Agent Record section and all its subsections, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List, Change Log, Status
|
||||
- CRITICAL: DO NOT modify Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, Testing sections, or any other sections not listed above
|
||||
blocking: "HALT for: Unapproved deps needed, confirm with user | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures attempting to implement or fix something repeatedly | Missing config | Failing regression"
|
||||
ready-for-review: "Code matches requirements + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete"
|
||||
completion: "All Tasks and Subtasks marked [x] and have tests→Validations and full regression passes (DON'T BE LAZY, EXECUTE ALL TESTS and CONFIRM)→Ensure File List is Complete→run the task execute-checklist for the checklist story-dod-checklist→set story status: 'Ready for Review'→HALT"
|
||||
- develop-story:
|
||||
- order-of-execution: "Read (first or next) task→Implement Task and its subtasks→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass, then update the task checkbox with [x]→Update story section File List to ensure it lists and new or modified or deleted source file→repeat order-of-execution until complete"
|
||||
- story-file-updates-ONLY:
|
||||
- CRITICAL: ONLY UPDATE THE STORY FILE WITH UPDATES TO SECTIONS INDICATED BELOW. DO NOT MODIFY ANY OTHER SECTIONS.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: You are ONLY authorized to edit these specific sections of story files - Tasks / Subtasks Checkboxes, Dev Agent Record section and all its subsections, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List, Change Log, Status
|
||||
- CRITICAL: DO NOT modify Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, Testing sections, or any other sections not listed above
|
||||
- blocking: "HALT for: Unapproved deps needed, confirm with user | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures attempting to implement or fix something repeatedly | Missing config | Failing regression"
|
||||
- ready-for-review: "Code matches requirements + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete"
|
||||
- completion: "All Tasks and Subtasks marked [x] and have tests→Validations and full regression passes (DON'T BE LAZY, EXECUTE ALL TESTS and CONFIRM)→Ensure File List is Complete→run the task execute-checklist for the checklist story-dod-checklist→set story status: 'Ready for Review'→HALT"
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- validate-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- validate-next-story.md
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,23 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# pm
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: John
|
||||
id: pm
|
||||
title: Product Manager
|
||||
icon: 📋
|
||||
whenToUse: Use for creating PRDs, product strategy, feature prioritization, roadmap planning, and stakeholder communication
|
||||
customization: null
|
||||
persona:
|
||||
role: Investigative Product Strategist & Market-Savvy PM
|
||||
style: Analytical, inquisitive, data-driven, user-focused, pragmatic
|
||||
@@ -32,32 +47,35 @@ persona:
|
||||
- Collaborative & iterative approach
|
||||
- Proactive risk identification
|
||||
- Strategic thinking & outcome-oriented
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- create-prd: run task create-doc.md with template prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-brownfield-prd: run task create-doc.md with template brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- create-brownfield-epic: run task brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- create-brownfield-story: run task brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- create-epic: Create epic for brownfield projects (task brownfield-create-epic)
|
||||
- create-story: Create user story from requirements (task brownfield-create-story)
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- shard-prd: run the task shard-doc.md for the provided prd.md (ask if not found)
|
||||
- correct-course: execute the correct-course task
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- prd-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- pm-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
- pm-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# po
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Sarah
|
||||
id: po
|
||||
@@ -34,34 +50,27 @@ persona:
|
||||
- User Collaboration for Validation - Seek input at critical checkpoints
|
||||
- Focus on Executable & Value-Driven Increments - Ensure work aligns with MVP goals
|
||||
- Documentation Ecosystem Integrity - Maintain consistency across all documents
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (default->po-master-checklist)
|
||||
- execute-checklist-po: Run task execute-checklist (checklist po-master-checklist)
|
||||
- shard-doc {document} {destination}: run the task shard-doc against the optionally provided document to the specified destination
|
||||
- correct-course: execute the correct-course task
|
||||
- create-epic: Create epic for brownfield projects (task brownfield-create-epic)
|
||||
- create-story: Create user story from requirements (task brownfield-create-story)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- validate-story-draft {story}: run the task validate-next-story against the provided story file
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- validate-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- validate-next-story.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- po-master-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- po-master-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,56 +1,88 @@
|
||||
# qa
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Quinn
|
||||
id: qa
|
||||
title: Senior Developer & QA Architect
|
||||
title: Test Architect & Quality Advisor
|
||||
icon: 🧪
|
||||
whenToUse: Use for senior code review, refactoring, test planning, quality assurance, and mentoring through code improvements
|
||||
whenToUse: |
|
||||
Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions,
|
||||
and code improvement. Provides thorough analysis including requirements
|
||||
traceability, risk assessment, and test strategy.
|
||||
Advisory only - teams choose their quality bar.
|
||||
customization: null
|
||||
persona:
|
||||
role: Senior Developer & Test Architect
|
||||
style: Methodical, detail-oriented, quality-focused, mentoring, strategic
|
||||
identity: Senior developer with deep expertise in code quality, architecture, and test automation
|
||||
focus: Code excellence through review, refactoring, and comprehensive testing strategies
|
||||
role: Test Architect with Quality Advisory Authority
|
||||
style: Comprehensive, systematic, advisory, educational, pragmatic
|
||||
identity: Test architect who provides thorough quality assessment and actionable recommendations without blocking progress
|
||||
focus: Comprehensive quality analysis through test architecture, risk assessment, and advisory gates
|
||||
core_principles:
|
||||
- Senior Developer Mindset - Review and improve code as a senior mentoring juniors
|
||||
- Active Refactoring - Don't just identify issues, fix them with clear explanations
|
||||
- Test Strategy & Architecture - Design holistic testing strategies across all levels
|
||||
- Code Quality Excellence - Enforce best practices, patterns, and clean code principles
|
||||
- Shift-Left Testing - Integrate testing early in development lifecycle
|
||||
- Performance & Security - Proactively identify and fix performance/security issues
|
||||
- Mentorship Through Action - Explain WHY and HOW when making improvements
|
||||
- Risk-Based Testing - Prioritize testing based on risk and critical areas
|
||||
- Continuous Improvement - Balance perfection with pragmatism
|
||||
- Architecture & Design Patterns - Ensure proper patterns and maintainable code structure
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- Depth As Needed - Go deep based on risk signals, stay concise when low risk
|
||||
- Requirements Traceability - Map all stories to tests using Given-When-Then patterns
|
||||
- Risk-Based Testing - Assess and prioritize by probability × impact
|
||||
- Quality Attributes - Validate NFRs (security, performance, reliability) via scenarios
|
||||
- Testability Assessment - Evaluate controllability, observability, debuggability
|
||||
- Gate Governance - Provide clear PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED decisions with rationale
|
||||
- Advisory Excellence - Educate through documentation, never block arbitrarily
|
||||
- Technical Debt Awareness - Identify and quantify debt with improvement suggestions
|
||||
- LLM Acceleration - Use LLMs to accelerate thorough yet focused analysis
|
||||
- Pragmatic Balance - Distinguish must-fix from nice-to-have improvements
|
||||
story-file-permissions:
|
||||
- CRITICAL: When reviewing stories, you are ONLY authorized to update the "QA Results" section of story files
|
||||
- CRITICAL: DO NOT modify any other sections including Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks/Subtasks, Dev Notes, Testing, Dev Agent Record, Change Log, or any other sections
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Your updates must be limited to appending your review results in the QA Results section only
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- review {story}: execute the task review-story for the highest sequence story in docs/stories unless another is specified - keep any specified technical-preferences in mind as needed
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the QA Engineer, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
- review {story}: |
|
||||
Adaptive, risk-aware comprehensive review.
|
||||
Produces: QA Results update in story file + gate file (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED).
|
||||
Gate file location: docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml
|
||||
Executes review-story task which includes all analysis and creates gate decision.
|
||||
- gate {story}: Execute qa-gate task to write/update quality gate decision in docs/qa/gates/
|
||||
- trace {story}: Execute trace-requirements task to map requirements to tests using Given-When-Then
|
||||
- risk-profile {story}: Execute risk-profile task to generate risk assessment matrix
|
||||
- test-design {story}: Execute test-design task to create comprehensive test scenarios
|
||||
- nfr-assess {story}: Execute nfr-assess task to validate non-functional requirements
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Test Architect, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- review-story
|
||||
- review-story.md
|
||||
- qa-gate.md
|
||||
- trace-requirements.md
|
||||
- risk-profile.md
|
||||
- test-design.md
|
||||
- nfr-assess.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- qa-gate-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,15 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# sm
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Bob
|
||||
id: sm
|
||||
@@ -26,26 +43,20 @@ persona:
|
||||
- Rigorously follow `create-next-story` procedure to generate the detailed user story
|
||||
- Will ensure all information comes from the PRD and Architecture to guide the dumb dev agent
|
||||
- You are NOT allowed to implement stories or modify code EVER!
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command and then HALT to await instruction if not given already.
|
||||
- Offer to help with story preparation but wait for explicit user confirmation
|
||||
- Only execute tasks when user explicitly requests them
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- draft: Execute task create-next-story
|
||||
- correct-course: Execute task correct-course
|
||||
- checklist {checklist}: Show numbered list of checklists if not provided, execute task execute-checklist
|
||||
- draft: Execute task create-next-story.md
|
||||
- correct-course: Execute task correct-course.md
|
||||
- story-checklist: Execute task execute-checklist.md with checklist story-draft-checklist.md
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Scrum Master, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-next-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,32 @@
|
||||
# ux-expert
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
|
||||
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
|
||||
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
|
||||
- type=folder (tasks|templates|checklists|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
|
||||
- Example: create-doc.md → {root}/tasks/create-doc.md
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
|
||||
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
|
||||
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
|
||||
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
|
||||
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
|
||||
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Sally
|
||||
id: ux-expert
|
||||
@@ -32,27 +48,19 @@ persona:
|
||||
- You have a keen eye for detail and a deep empathy for users.
|
||||
- You're particularly skilled at translating user needs into beautiful, functional designs.
|
||||
- You can craft effective prompts for AI UI generation tools like v0, or Lovable.
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- Always start by understanding the user's context, goals, and constraints before proposing solutions.
|
||||
# All commands require * prefix when used (e.g., *help)
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- generate-ui-prompt: Create AI frontend generation prompt
|
||||
- research {topic}: Execute create-deep-research-prompt task to generate a prompt to init UX deep research
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (default->po-master-checklist)
|
||||
- create-front-end-spec: run task create-doc.md with template front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- generate-ui-prompt: Run task generate-ai-frontend-prompt.md
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the UX Expert, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -403,33 +403,28 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
|
||||
Now that you've completed the checklist, generate a comprehensive validation report that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Overall architecture readiness (High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
- Critical risks identified
|
||||
- Key strengths of the architecture
|
||||
- Project type (Full-stack/Frontend/Backend) and sections evaluated
|
||||
|
||||
2. Section Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
- Pass rate for each major section (percentage of items passed)
|
||||
- Most concerning failures or gaps
|
||||
- Sections requiring immediate attention
|
||||
- Note any sections skipped due to project type
|
||||
|
||||
3. Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
- Top 5 risks by severity
|
||||
- Mitigation recommendations for each
|
||||
- Timeline impact of addressing issues
|
||||
|
||||
4. Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
- Must-fix items before development
|
||||
- Should-fix items for better quality
|
||||
- Nice-to-have improvements
|
||||
|
||||
5. AI Implementation Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- Specific concerns for AI agent implementation
|
||||
- Areas needing additional clarification
|
||||
- Complexity hotspots to address
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
|
||||
Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Overall PRD completeness (percentage)
|
||||
- MVP scope appropriateness (Too Large/Just Right/Too Small)
|
||||
- Readiness for architecture phase (Ready/Nearly Ready/Not Ready)
|
||||
@@ -312,26 +311,22 @@ Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
2. Category Analysis Table
|
||||
Fill in the actual table with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: PASS (90%+ complete), PARTIAL (60-89%), FAIL (<60%)
|
||||
- Critical Issues: Specific problems that block progress
|
||||
|
||||
3. Top Issues by Priority
|
||||
|
||||
- BLOCKERS: Must fix before architect can proceed
|
||||
- HIGH: Should fix for quality
|
||||
- MEDIUM: Would improve clarity
|
||||
- LOW: Nice to have
|
||||
|
||||
4. MVP Scope Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
- Features that might be cut for true MVP
|
||||
- Missing features that are essential
|
||||
- Complexity concerns
|
||||
- Timeline realism
|
||||
|
||||
5. Technical Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- Clarity of technical constraints
|
||||
- Identified technical risks
|
||||
- Areas needing architect investigation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,12 +8,10 @@ PROJECT TYPE DETECTION:
|
||||
First, determine the project type by checking:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is this a GREENFIELD project (new from scratch)?
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for: New project initialization, no existing codebase references
|
||||
- Check for: prd.md, architecture.md, new project setup stories
|
||||
|
||||
2. Is this a BROWNFIELD project (enhancing existing system)?
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for: References to existing codebase, enhancement/modification language
|
||||
- Check for: brownfield-prd.md, brownfield-architecture.md, existing system analysis
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -347,7 +345,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
|
||||
Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Project type: [Greenfield/Brownfield] with [UI/No UI]
|
||||
- Overall readiness (percentage)
|
||||
- Go/No-Go recommendation
|
||||
@@ -357,42 +354,36 @@ Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
|
||||
2. Project-Specific Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
FOR GREENFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Setup completeness
|
||||
- Dependency sequencing
|
||||
- MVP scope appropriateness
|
||||
- Development timeline feasibility
|
||||
|
||||
FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Integration risk level (High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
- Existing system impact assessment
|
||||
- Rollback readiness
|
||||
- User disruption potential
|
||||
|
||||
3. Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
- Top 5 risks by severity
|
||||
- Mitigation recommendations
|
||||
- Timeline impact of addressing issues
|
||||
- [BROWNFIELD] Specific integration risks
|
||||
|
||||
4. MVP Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- Core features coverage
|
||||
- Missing essential functionality
|
||||
- Scope creep identified
|
||||
- True MVP vs over-engineering
|
||||
|
||||
5. Implementation Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- Developer clarity score (1-10)
|
||||
- Ambiguous requirements count
|
||||
- Missing technical details
|
||||
- [BROWNFIELD] Integration point clarity
|
||||
|
||||
6. Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
- Must-fix before development
|
||||
- Should-fix for quality
|
||||
- Consider for improvement
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,14 +25,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
1. **Requirements Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Be specific - list each requirement and whether it's complete]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All functional requirements specified in the story are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All acceptance criteria defined in the story are met.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Coding Standards & Project Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Code quality matters for maintainability. Check each item carefully]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All new/modified code strictly adheres to `Operational Guidelines`.
|
||||
- [ ] All new/modified code aligns with `Project Structure` (file locations, naming, etc.).
|
||||
- [ ] Adherence to `Tech Stack` for technologies/versions used (if story introduces or modifies tech usage).
|
||||
@@ -44,7 +42,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
3. **Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Testing proves your code works. Be honest about test coverage]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All required unit tests as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All required integration tests (if applicable) as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All tests (unit, integration, E2E if applicable) pass successfully.
|
||||
@@ -53,14 +50,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
4. **Functionality & Verification:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Did you actually run and test your code? Be specific about what you tested]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Functionality has been manually verified by the developer (e.g., running the app locally, checking UI, testing API endpoints).
|
||||
- [ ] Edge cases and potential error conditions considered and handled gracefully.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Story Administration:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Documentation helps the next developer. What should they know?]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All tasks within the story file are marked as complete.
|
||||
- [ ] Any clarifications or decisions made during development are documented in the story file or linked appropriately.
|
||||
- [ ] The story wrap up section has been completed with notes of changes or information relevant to the next story or overall project, the agent model that was primarily used during development, and the changelog of any changes is properly updated.
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +63,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
6. **Dependencies, Build & Configuration:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Build issues block everyone. Ensure everything compiles and runs cleanly]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Project builds successfully without errors.
|
||||
- [ ] Project linting passes
|
||||
- [ ] Any new dependencies added were either pre-approved in the story requirements OR explicitly approved by the user during development (approval documented in story file).
|
||||
@@ -79,7 +73,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
7. **Documentation (If Applicable):**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Good documentation prevents future confusion. What needs explaining?]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Relevant inline code documentation (e.g., JSDoc, TSDoc, Python docstrings) for new public APIs or complex logic is complete.
|
||||
- [ ] User-facing documentation updated, if changes impact users.
|
||||
- [ ] Technical documentation (e.g., READMEs, system diagrams) updated if significant architectural changes were made.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,19 +117,16 @@ Note: We don't need every file listed - just the important ones.]]
|
||||
Generate a concise validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Quick Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Story readiness: READY / NEEDS REVISION / BLOCKED
|
||||
- Clarity score (1-10)
|
||||
- Major gaps identified
|
||||
|
||||
2. Fill in the validation table with:
|
||||
|
||||
- PASS: Requirements clearly met
|
||||
- PARTIAL: Some gaps but workable
|
||||
- FAIL: Critical information missing
|
||||
|
||||
3. Specific Issues (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
- List concrete problems to fix
|
||||
- Suggest specific improvements
|
||||
- Identify any blocking dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
|
||||
version: 4.26.0
|
||||
markdownExploder: true
|
||||
prd:
|
||||
prdFile: docs/prd.md
|
||||
@@ -18,8 +17,4 @@ devLoadAlwaysFiles:
|
||||
- docs/architecture/source-tree.md
|
||||
devDebugLog: .ai/debug-log.md
|
||||
devStoryLocation: docs/stories
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
planFile: docs/workflow-plan.md
|
||||
trackProgress: true
|
||||
enforceSequence: false
|
||||
updateOnCompletion: true
|
||||
slashPrefix: BMad
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ npx bmad-method install
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL RULE for Development**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **ALWAYS use SM agent for story creation** - Never use bmad-master/orchestrator
|
||||
- **ALWAYS use Dev agent for implementation** - Never use bmad-master/orchestrator
|
||||
- **ALWAYS use SM agent for story creation** - Never use bmad-master or bmad-orchestrator
|
||||
- **ALWAYS use Dev agent for implementation** - Never use bmad-master or bmad-orchestrator
|
||||
- **Why this matters**: SM and Dev agents are specifically optimized for the development workflow
|
||||
- **No exceptions**: Even if using bmad-master for everything else, switch to SM → Dev for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ You are the "Vibe CEO" - thinking like a CEO with unlimited resources and a sing
|
||||
- **Cursor**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@bmad-master`)
|
||||
- **Windsurf**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@bmad-master`)
|
||||
- **Trae**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@bmad-master`)
|
||||
- **Roo Code**: Select mode from mode selector (e.g., `bmad-bmad-master`)
|
||||
- **Roo Code**: Select mode from mode selector (e.g., `bmad-master`)
|
||||
- **GitHub Copilot**: Open the Chat view (`⌃⌘I` on Mac, `Ctrl+Alt+I` on Windows/Linux) and select **Agent** from the chat mode selector.
|
||||
|
||||
**Chat Management Guidelines**:
|
||||
@@ -403,17 +403,10 @@ The BMad-Method is built around a modular architecture centered on the `bmad-cor
|
||||
|
||||
BMad employs a sophisticated template system with three key components:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Template Format** (`utils/template-format.md`): Defines markup language for variable substitution and AI processing directives
|
||||
2. **Document Creation** (`tasks/create-doc.md`): Orchestrates template selection and user interaction
|
||||
1. **Template Format** (`utils/bmad-doc-template.md`): Defines markup language for variable substitution and AI processing directives from yaml templates
|
||||
2. **Document Creation** (`tasks/create-doc.md`): Orchestrates template selection and user interaction to transform yaml spec to final markdown output
|
||||
3. **Advanced Elicitation** (`tasks/advanced-elicitation.md`): Provides interactive refinement through structured brainstorming
|
||||
|
||||
**Template Features**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-contained**: Templates embed both output structure and processing instructions
|
||||
- **Variable Substitution**: `{{placeholders}}` for dynamic content
|
||||
- **AI Processing Directives**: `[[LLM: instructions]]` for AI-only processing
|
||||
- **Interactive Refinement**: Built-in elicitation processes for quality improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Preferences Integration
|
||||
|
||||
The `technical-preferences.md` file serves as a persistent technical profile that:
|
||||
@@ -549,7 +542,7 @@ Each status change requires user verification and approval before proceeding.
|
||||
#### Greenfield Development
|
||||
|
||||
- Business analysis and market research
|
||||
- Product requirements and feature definition
|
||||
- Product requirements and feature definition
|
||||
- System architecture and design
|
||||
- Development execution
|
||||
- Testing and deployment
|
||||
@@ -658,8 +651,11 @@ Templates with Level 2 headings (`##`) can be automatically sharded:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Goals and Background Context
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## User Interface Design Goals
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -733,7 +729,7 @@ For full details, see `CONTRIBUTING.md`. Key points:
|
||||
- Atomic commits - one logical change per commit
|
||||
- Must align with guiding principles
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Principles** (from GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md):
|
||||
**Core Principles** (from docs/GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dev Agents Must Be Lean**: Minimize dependencies, save context for code
|
||||
- **Natural Language First**: Everything in markdown, no code in core
|
||||
@@ -803,8 +799,8 @@ Use the **expansion-creator** pack to build your own:
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting Help
|
||||
|
||||
- **Commands**: Use `/help` in any environment to see available commands
|
||||
- **Agent Switching**: Use `/switch agent-name` with orchestrator for role changes
|
||||
- **Commands**: Use `*/*help` in any environment to see available commands
|
||||
- **Agent Switching**: Use `*/*switch agent-name` with orchestrator for role changes
|
||||
- **Documentation**: Check `docs/` folder for project-specific context
|
||||
- **Community**: Discord and GitHub resources available for support
|
||||
- **Contributing**: See `CONTRIBUTING.md` for full guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,16 +3,19 @@
|
||||
## Core Reflective Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Expand or Contract for Audience**
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask whether to 'expand' (add detail, elaborate) or 'contract' (simplify, clarify)
|
||||
- Identify specific target audience if relevant
|
||||
- Tailor content complexity and depth accordingly
|
||||
|
||||
**Explain Reasoning (CoT Step-by-Step)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Walk through the step-by-step thinking process
|
||||
- Reveal underlying assumptions and decision points
|
||||
- Show how conclusions were reached from current role's perspective
|
||||
|
||||
**Critique and Refine**
|
||||
|
||||
- Review output for flaws, inconsistencies, or improvement areas
|
||||
- Identify specific weaknesses from role's expertise
|
||||
- Suggest refined version reflecting domain knowledge
|
||||
@@ -20,12 +23,14 @@
|
||||
## Structural Analysis Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Analyze Logical Flow and Dependencies**
|
||||
|
||||
- Examine content structure for logical progression
|
||||
- Check internal consistency and coherence
|
||||
- Identify and validate dependencies between elements
|
||||
- Confirm effective ordering and sequencing
|
||||
|
||||
**Assess Alignment with Overall Goals**
|
||||
|
||||
- Evaluate content contribution to stated objectives
|
||||
- Identify any misalignments or gaps
|
||||
- Interpret alignment from specific role's perspective
|
||||
@@ -34,12 +39,14 @@
|
||||
## Risk and Challenge Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Identify Potential Risks and Unforeseen Issues**
|
||||
|
||||
- Brainstorm potential risks from role's expertise
|
||||
- Identify overlooked edge cases or scenarios
|
||||
- Anticipate unintended consequences
|
||||
- Highlight implementation challenges
|
||||
|
||||
**Challenge from Critical Perspective**
|
||||
|
||||
- Adopt critical stance on current content
|
||||
- Play devil's advocate from specified viewpoint
|
||||
- Argue against proposal highlighting weaknesses
|
||||
@@ -48,12 +55,14 @@
|
||||
## Creative Exploration Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Tree of Thoughts Deep Dive**
|
||||
|
||||
- Break problem into discrete "thoughts" or intermediate steps
|
||||
- Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously
|
||||
- Use self-evaluation to classify each path as "sure", "likely", or "impossible"
|
||||
- Apply search algorithms (BFS/DFS) to find optimal solution paths
|
||||
|
||||
**Hindsight is 20/20: The 'If Only...' Reflection**
|
||||
|
||||
- Imagine retrospective scenario based on current content
|
||||
- Identify the one "if only we had known/done X..." insight
|
||||
- Describe imagined consequences humorously or dramatically
|
||||
@@ -62,6 +71,7 @@
|
||||
## Multi-Persona Collaboration Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Agile Team Perspective Shift**
|
||||
|
||||
- Rotate through different Scrum team member viewpoints
|
||||
- Product Owner: Focus on user value and business impact
|
||||
- Scrum Master: Examine process flow and team dynamics
|
||||
@@ -69,12 +79,14 @@
|
||||
- QA: Identify testing scenarios and quality concerns
|
||||
|
||||
**Stakeholder Round Table**
|
||||
|
||||
- Convene virtual meeting with multiple personas
|
||||
- Each persona contributes unique perspective on content
|
||||
- Identify conflicts and synergies between viewpoints
|
||||
- Synthesize insights into actionable recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**Meta-Prompting Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
- Step back to analyze the structure and logic of current approach
|
||||
- Question the format and methodology being used
|
||||
- Suggest alternative frameworks or mental models
|
||||
@@ -83,24 +95,28 @@
|
||||
## Advanced 2025 Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
**Self-Consistency Validation**
|
||||
|
||||
- Generate multiple reasoning paths for same problem
|
||||
- Compare consistency across different approaches
|
||||
- Identify most reliable and robust solution
|
||||
- Highlight areas where approaches diverge and why
|
||||
|
||||
**ReWOO (Reasoning Without Observation)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Separate parametric reasoning from tool-based actions
|
||||
- Create reasoning plan without external dependencies
|
||||
- Identify what can be solved through pure reasoning
|
||||
- Optimize for efficiency and reduced token usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Persona-Pattern Hybrid**
|
||||
|
||||
- Combine specific role expertise with elicitation pattern
|
||||
- Architect + Risk Analysis: Deep technical risk assessment
|
||||
- UX Expert + User Journey: End-to-end experience critique
|
||||
- PM + Stakeholder Analysis: Multi-perspective impact review
|
||||
|
||||
**Emergent Collaboration Discovery**
|
||||
|
||||
- Allow multiple perspectives to naturally emerge
|
||||
- Identify unexpected insights from persona interactions
|
||||
- Explore novel combinations of viewpoints
|
||||
@@ -109,18 +125,21 @@
|
||||
## Game-Based Elicitation Methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Red Team vs Blue Team**
|
||||
|
||||
- Red Team: Attack the proposal, find vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Blue Team: Defend and strengthen the approach
|
||||
- Competitive analysis reveals blind spots
|
||||
- Results in more robust, battle-tested solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**Innovation Tournament**
|
||||
|
||||
- Pit multiple alternative approaches against each other
|
||||
- Score each approach across different criteria
|
||||
- Crowd-source evaluation from different personas
|
||||
- Identify winning combination of features
|
||||
|
||||
**Escape Room Challenge**
|
||||
|
||||
- Present content as constraints to work within
|
||||
- Find creative solutions within tight limitations
|
||||
- Identify minimum viable approach
|
||||
@@ -129,6 +148,7 @@
|
||||
## Process Control
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceed / No Further Actions**
|
||||
|
||||
- Acknowledge choice to finalize current work
|
||||
- Accept output as-is or move to next step
|
||||
- Prepare to continue without additional elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
146
bmad-core/data/test-levels-framework.md
Normal file
146
bmad-core/data/test-levels-framework.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
|
||||
# Test Levels Framework
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive guide for determining appropriate test levels (unit, integration, E2E) for different scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Level Decision Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### Unit Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Testing pure functions and business logic
|
||||
- Algorithm correctness
|
||||
- Input validation and data transformation
|
||||
- Error handling in isolated components
|
||||
- Complex calculations or state machines
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Fast execution (immediate feedback)
|
||||
- No external dependencies (DB, API, file system)
|
||||
- Highly maintainable and stable
|
||||
- Easy to debug failures
|
||||
|
||||
**Example scenarios:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
unit_test:
|
||||
component: "PriceCalculator"
|
||||
scenario: "Calculate discount with multiple rules"
|
||||
justification: "Complex business logic with multiple branches"
|
||||
mock_requirements: "None - pure function"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Component interaction verification
|
||||
- Database operations and transactions
|
||||
- API endpoint contracts
|
||||
- Service-to-service communication
|
||||
- Middleware and interceptor behavior
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Moderate execution time
|
||||
- Tests component boundaries
|
||||
- May use test databases or containers
|
||||
- Validates system integration points
|
||||
|
||||
**Example scenarios:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
integration_test:
|
||||
components: ["UserService", "AuthRepository"]
|
||||
scenario: "Create user with role assignment"
|
||||
justification: "Critical data flow between service and persistence"
|
||||
test_environment: "In-memory database"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### End-to-End Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Critical user journeys
|
||||
- Cross-system workflows
|
||||
- Visual regression testing
|
||||
- Compliance and regulatory requirements
|
||||
- Final validation before release
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Slower execution
|
||||
- Tests complete workflows
|
||||
- Requires full environment setup
|
||||
- Most realistic but most brittle
|
||||
|
||||
**Example scenarios:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
e2e_test:
|
||||
journey: "Complete checkout process"
|
||||
scenario: "User purchases with saved payment method"
|
||||
justification: "Revenue-critical path requiring full validation"
|
||||
environment: "Staging with test payment gateway"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Level Selection Rules
|
||||
|
||||
### Favor Unit Tests When:
|
||||
|
||||
- Logic can be isolated
|
||||
- No side effects involved
|
||||
- Fast feedback needed
|
||||
- High cyclomatic complexity
|
||||
|
||||
### Favor Integration Tests When:
|
||||
|
||||
- Testing persistence layer
|
||||
- Validating service contracts
|
||||
- Testing middleware/interceptors
|
||||
- Component boundaries critical
|
||||
|
||||
### Favor E2E Tests When:
|
||||
|
||||
- User-facing critical paths
|
||||
- Multi-system interactions
|
||||
- Regulatory compliance scenarios
|
||||
- Visual regression important
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-patterns to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
- E2E testing for business logic validation
|
||||
- Unit testing framework behavior
|
||||
- Integration testing third-party libraries
|
||||
- Duplicate coverage across levels
|
||||
|
||||
## Duplicate Coverage Guard
|
||||
|
||||
**Before adding any test, check:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is this already tested at a lower level?
|
||||
2. Can a unit test cover this instead of integration?
|
||||
3. Can an integration test cover this instead of E2E?
|
||||
|
||||
**Coverage overlap is only acceptable when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Testing different aspects (unit: logic, integration: interaction, e2e: user experience)
|
||||
- Critical paths requiring defense in depth
|
||||
- Regression prevention for previously broken functionality
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
- Unit: `test_{component}_{scenario}`
|
||||
- Integration: `test_{flow}_{interaction}`
|
||||
- E2E: `test_{journey}_{outcome}`
|
||||
|
||||
## Test ID Format
|
||||
|
||||
`{EPIC}.{STORY}-{LEVEL}-{SEQ}`
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- `1.3-UNIT-001`
|
||||
- `1.3-INT-002`
|
||||
- `1.3-E2E-001`
|
||||
172
bmad-core/data/test-priorities-matrix.md
Normal file
172
bmad-core/data/test-priorities-matrix.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
|
||||
# Test Priorities Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
Guide for prioritizing test scenarios based on risk, criticality, and business impact.
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Levels
|
||||
|
||||
### P0 - Critical (Must Test)
|
||||
|
||||
**Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Revenue-impacting functionality
|
||||
- Security-critical paths
|
||||
- Data integrity operations
|
||||
- Regulatory compliance requirements
|
||||
- Previously broken functionality (regression prevention)
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Payment processing
|
||||
- Authentication/authorization
|
||||
- User data creation/deletion
|
||||
- Financial calculations
|
||||
- GDPR/privacy compliance
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Comprehensive coverage at all levels
|
||||
- Both happy and unhappy paths
|
||||
- Edge cases and error scenarios
|
||||
- Performance under load
|
||||
|
||||
### P1 - High (Should Test)
|
||||
|
||||
**Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Core user journeys
|
||||
- Frequently used features
|
||||
- Features with complex logic
|
||||
- Integration points between systems
|
||||
- Features affecting user experience
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- User registration flow
|
||||
- Search functionality
|
||||
- Data import/export
|
||||
- Notification systems
|
||||
- Dashboard displays
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary happy paths required
|
||||
- Key error scenarios
|
||||
- Critical edge cases
|
||||
- Basic performance validation
|
||||
|
||||
### P2 - Medium (Nice to Test)
|
||||
|
||||
**Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Secondary features
|
||||
- Admin functionality
|
||||
- Reporting features
|
||||
- Configuration options
|
||||
- UI polish and aesthetics
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Admin settings panels
|
||||
- Report generation
|
||||
- Theme customization
|
||||
- Help documentation
|
||||
- Analytics tracking
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Happy path coverage
|
||||
- Basic error handling
|
||||
- Can defer edge cases
|
||||
|
||||
### P3 - Low (Test if Time Permits)
|
||||
|
||||
**Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Rarely used features
|
||||
- Nice-to-have functionality
|
||||
- Cosmetic issues
|
||||
- Non-critical optimizations
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Advanced preferences
|
||||
- Legacy feature support
|
||||
- Experimental features
|
||||
- Debug utilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Smoke tests only
|
||||
- Can rely on manual testing
|
||||
- Document known limitations
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk-Based Priority Adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
### Increase Priority When:
|
||||
|
||||
- High user impact (affects >50% of users)
|
||||
- High financial impact (>$10K potential loss)
|
||||
- Security vulnerability potential
|
||||
- Compliance/legal requirements
|
||||
- Customer-reported issues
|
||||
- Complex implementation (>500 LOC)
|
||||
- Multiple system dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### Decrease Priority When:
|
||||
|
||||
- Feature flag protected
|
||||
- Gradual rollout planned
|
||||
- Strong monitoring in place
|
||||
- Easy rollback capability
|
||||
- Low usage metrics
|
||||
- Simple implementation
|
||||
- Well-isolated component
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Coverage by Priority
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Unit Coverage | Integration Coverage | E2E Coverage |
|
||||
| -------- | ------------- | -------------------- | ------------------ |
|
||||
| P0 | >90% | >80% | All critical paths |
|
||||
| P1 | >80% | >60% | Main happy paths |
|
||||
| P2 | >60% | >40% | Smoke tests |
|
||||
| P3 | Best effort | Best effort | Manual only |
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Assignment Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Start with business impact** - What happens if this fails?
|
||||
2. **Consider probability** - How likely is failure?
|
||||
3. **Factor in detectability** - Would we know if it failed?
|
||||
4. **Account for recoverability** - Can we fix it quickly?
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Is it revenue-critical?
|
||||
├─ YES → P0
|
||||
└─ NO → Does it affect core user journey?
|
||||
├─ YES → Is it high-risk?
|
||||
│ ├─ YES → P0
|
||||
│ └─ NO → P1
|
||||
└─ NO → Is it frequently used?
|
||||
├─ YES → P1
|
||||
└─ NO → Is it customer-facing?
|
||||
├─ YES → P2
|
||||
└─ NO → P3
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Execution Order
|
||||
|
||||
1. Execute P0 tests first (fail fast on critical issues)
|
||||
2. Execute P1 tests second (core functionality)
|
||||
3. Execute P2 tests if time permits
|
||||
4. P3 tests only in full regression cycles
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuous Adjustment
|
||||
|
||||
Review and adjust priorities based on:
|
||||
|
||||
- Production incident patterns
|
||||
- User feedback and complaints
|
||||
- Usage analytics
|
||||
- Test failure history
|
||||
- Business priority changes
|
||||
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `change-checklist`.
|
||||
- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `{root}/checklists/change-checklist`.
|
||||
- Analyze the impacts of the change on epics, project artifacts, and the MVP, guided by the checklist's structure.
|
||||
- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, rescope features) as prompted by the checklist.
|
||||
- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, re-scope features) as prompted by the checklist.
|
||||
- Draft specific, actionable proposed updates to any affected project artifacts (e.g., epics, user stories, PRD sections, architecture document sections) based on the analysis.
|
||||
- Produce a consolidated "Sprint Change Proposal" document that contains the impact analysis and the clearly drafted proposed edits for user review and approval.
|
||||
- Ensure a clear handoff path if the nature of the changes necessitates fundamental replanning by other core agents (like PM or Architect).
|
||||
@@ -16,19 +16,16 @@
|
||||
- **Acknowledge Task & Inputs:**
|
||||
- Confirm with the user that the "Correct Course Task" (Change Navigation & Integration) is being initiated.
|
||||
- Verify the change trigger and ensure you have the user's initial explanation of the issue and its perceived impact.
|
||||
- Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `change-checklist` (e.g., `change-checklist`).
|
||||
- Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `{root}/checklists/change-checklist`.
|
||||
- **Establish Interaction Mode:**
|
||||
- Ask the user their preferred interaction mode for this task:
|
||||
- **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the `change-checklist` section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
|
||||
- **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the change-checklist section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
|
||||
- **"YOLO Mode (Batch Processing):** Or, would you prefer I conduct a more batched analysis based on the checklist and then present a consolidated set of findings and proposed changes for a broader review? This can be quicker for initial assessment but might require more extensive review of the combined proposals."
|
||||
- Request the user to select their preferred mode.
|
||||
- Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode (e.g., "Okay, we will proceed in Incremental mode."). This chosen mode will govern how subsequent steps in this task are executed.
|
||||
- **Explain Process:** Briefly inform the user: "We will now use the `change-checklist` to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
|
||||
<rule>When asking multiple questions or presenting multiple points for user input at once, number them clearly (e.g., 1., 2a., 2b.) to make it easier for the user to provide specific responses.</rule>
|
||||
- Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode and then inform the user: "We will now use the change-checklist to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Execute Checklist Analysis (Iteratively or Batched, per Interaction Mode)
|
||||
|
||||
- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the `change-checklist` (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
|
||||
- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the change-checklist (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
|
||||
- For each checklist item or logical group of items (depending on interaction mode):
|
||||
- Present the relevant prompt(s) or considerations from the checklist to the user.
|
||||
- Request necessary information and actively analyze the relevant project artifacts (PRD, epics, architecture documents, story history, etc.) to assess the impact.
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +48,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate "Sprint Change Proposal" with Edits
|
||||
|
||||
- Synthesize the complete `change-checklist` analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the `change-checklist` (Proposal Components).
|
||||
- Synthesize the complete change-checklist analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the change-checklist.
|
||||
- The proposal must clearly present:
|
||||
- **Analysis Summary:** A concise overview of the original issue, its analyzed impact (on epics, artifacts, MVP scope), and the rationale for the chosen path forward.
|
||||
- **Specific Proposed Edits:** For each affected artifact, clearly show or describe the exact changes (e.g., "Change Story X.Y from: [old text] To: [new text]", "Add new Acceptance Criterion to Story A.B: [new AC]", "Update Section 3.2 of Architecture Document as follows: [new/modified text or diagram description]").
|
||||
@@ -68,6 +65,6 @@
|
||||
## Output Deliverables
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary:** A "Sprint Change Proposal" document (in markdown format). This document will contain:
|
||||
- A summary of the `change-checklist` analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
|
||||
- A summary of the change-checklist analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
|
||||
- Specific, clearly drafted proposed edits for all affected project artifacts.
|
||||
- **Implicit:** An annotated `change-checklist` (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
|
||||
- **Implicit:** An annotated change-checklist (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,20 +22,7 @@ Create detailed, implementation-ready stories for brownfield projects where trad
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Execution Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Check Workflow Plan and Documentation Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check for workflow plan first, then available documentation]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### 0.1 Check Workflow Plan
|
||||
|
||||
- Load core-config.yaml and check if `workflow.trackProgress: true`
|
||||
- If yes, check for active plan at `workflow.planFile`
|
||||
- If plan exists:
|
||||
- Verify story creation aligns with current plan step
|
||||
- If out of sequence, warn user (enforce based on config)
|
||||
- Note which step this story creation corresponds to
|
||||
|
||||
#### 0.2 Determine Documentation Context
|
||||
### 0. Documentation Context
|
||||
|
||||
Check for available documentation in this order:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +55,7 @@ Based on available documentation:
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.2 Gather Essential Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For brownfield stories, you MUST gather enough context for safe implementation. Be prepared to ask the user for missing information.]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: For brownfield stories, you MUST gather enough context for safe implementation. Be prepared to ask the user for missing information.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Information Checklist:**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,21 +65,7 @@ Based on available documentation:
|
||||
- [ ] What technical constraints exist?
|
||||
- [ ] Are there any "gotchas" or workarounds to know about?
|
||||
|
||||
If any required information is missing, ask the user:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
I need additional context for this brownfield story:
|
||||
|
||||
Missing Information:
|
||||
- [List specific missing items]
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide:
|
||||
1. [Specific question about integration]
|
||||
2. [Specific question about patterns]
|
||||
3. [Specific question about constraints]
|
||||
|
||||
Or point me to documentation that contains this information.
|
||||
```
|
||||
If any required information is missing, list the missing information and ask the user to provide it.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Extract Technical Context from Available Sources
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,8 +90,6 @@ If using brownfield PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2.3 From User Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: When working with non-BMad documentation, actively extract and organize the information into categories the Dev agent will need]]
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the user to help identify:
|
||||
|
||||
- Relevant technical specifications
|
||||
@@ -138,12 +109,13 @@ Start with the story template, filling in what's known:
|
||||
## Status: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
## Story
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{enhancement_capability}},
|
||||
so that {{value_delivered}}.
|
||||
|
||||
## Context Source
|
||||
[[LLM: Document where story requirements came from]]
|
||||
|
||||
- Source Document: {{document name/type}}
|
||||
- Enhancement Type: {{single feature/bug fix/integration/etc}}
|
||||
- Existing System Impact: {{brief assessment}}
|
||||
@@ -151,51 +123,40 @@ so that {{value_delivered}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2 Develop Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For brownfield, ALWAYS include criteria about maintaining existing functionality]]
|
||||
Critical: For brownfield, ALWAYS include criteria about maintaining existing functionality
|
||||
|
||||
Standard structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. New functionality works as specified
|
||||
2. Existing {{affected feature}} continues to work unchanged
|
||||
2. Existing {{affected feature}} continues to work unchanged
|
||||
3. Integration with {{existing system}} maintains current behavior
|
||||
4. No regression in {{related area}}
|
||||
5. Performance remains within acceptable bounds
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.3 Gather Technical Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This is where you'll need to be interactive with the user if information is missing]]
|
||||
Critical: This is where you'll need to be interactive with the user if information is missing
|
||||
|
||||
Create Dev Technical Guidance section with available information:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
````markdown
|
||||
## Dev Technical Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing System Context
|
||||
|
||||
[Extract from available documentation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[Based on patterns found or ask user]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
[From documentation or user input]
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing Information
|
||||
[[LLM: List anything you couldn't find that dev will need]]
|
||||
- [ ] {{missing item 1}}
|
||||
- [ ] {{missing item 2}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If critical information is missing, pause and ask:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
To complete the technical guidance for this story, I need:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **{{Missing Category}}**:
|
||||
- Specifically: {{what you need to know}}
|
||||
- Why needed: {{how it impacts implementation}}
|
||||
|
||||
Can you provide this information or point me to relevant code/docs?
|
||||
```
|
||||
Critical: List anything you couldn't find that dev will need and ask for the missing information
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Task Generation with Safety Checks
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -233,10 +194,11 @@ Example task structure for brownfield:
|
||||
- [ ] Integration test for {{integration point}}
|
||||
- [ ] Update existing tests if needed
|
||||
```
|
||||
````
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL for brownfield - always include risk assessment]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: for brownfield - always include risk assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Add section for brownfield-specific risks:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -244,14 +206,17 @@ Add section for brownfield-specific risks:
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Risk**: {{main risk to existing system}}
|
||||
- **Mitigation**: {{how to address}}
|
||||
- **Verification**: {{how to confirm safety}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Rollback Plan
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Simple steps to undo changes if needed}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Safety Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Existing {{feature}} tested before changes
|
||||
- [ ] Changes can be feature-flagged or isolated
|
||||
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented
|
||||
@@ -294,6 +259,7 @@ Include header noting documentation context:
|
||||
<!-- Context: Brownfield enhancement to {{existing system}} -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
[Rest of story content...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -314,7 +280,7 @@ Key Integration Points Identified:
|
||||
Risks Noted:
|
||||
- {{primary risk}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{If missing info}}:
|
||||
{{If missing info}}:
|
||||
Note: Some technical details were unclear. The story includes exploration tasks to gather needed information during implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Next Steps:
|
||||
@@ -324,15 +290,6 @@ Next Steps:
|
||||
4. Dev agent can then implement with safety checks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Update Workflow Plan (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After successful story creation]]
|
||||
|
||||
- If workflow plan tracking is enabled and story was created successfully:
|
||||
- Call update-workflow-plan task to mark step complete
|
||||
- Parameters: task: create-brownfield-story, step_id: {from plan check}, status: complete
|
||||
- If plan shows next recommended step, include it in handoff message
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
The brownfield story creation is successful when:
|
||||
@@ -348,7 +305,7 @@ The brownfield story creation is successful when:
|
||||
## Important Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- This task is specifically for brownfield projects with non-standard documentation
|
||||
- Always prioritize existing system safety over new features
|
||||
- Always prioritize existing system stability over new features
|
||||
- When in doubt, add exploration and verification tasks
|
||||
- It's better to ask the user for clarification than make assumptions
|
||||
- Each story should be self-contained for the dev agent
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,78 +14,67 @@ Generate well-structured research prompts that:
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Type Selection
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based on their needs and any input documents they've provided.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Research Focus Options
|
||||
|
||||
Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Product Validation Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Validate product hypotheses and market fit
|
||||
- Test assumptions about user needs and solutions
|
||||
- Assess technical and business feasibility
|
||||
- Identify risks and mitigation strategies
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Market Opportunity Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Analyze market size and growth potential
|
||||
- Identify market segments and dynamics
|
||||
- Assess market entry strategies
|
||||
- Evaluate timing and market readiness
|
||||
|
||||
3. **User & Customer Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Deep dive into user personas and behaviors
|
||||
- Understand jobs-to-be-done and pain points
|
||||
- Map customer journeys and touchpoints
|
||||
- Analyze willingness to pay and value perception
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Competitive Intelligence Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Detailed competitor analysis and positioning
|
||||
- Feature and capability comparisons
|
||||
- Business model and strategy analysis
|
||||
- Identify competitive advantages and gaps
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Technology & Innovation Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Assess technology trends and possibilities
|
||||
- Evaluate technical approaches and architectures
|
||||
- Identify emerging technologies and disruptions
|
||||
- Analyze build vs. buy vs. partner options
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Industry & Ecosystem Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Map industry value chains and dynamics
|
||||
- Identify key players and relationships
|
||||
- Analyze regulatory and compliance factors
|
||||
- Understand partnership opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Strategic Options Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Evaluate different strategic directions
|
||||
- Assess business model alternatives
|
||||
- Analyze go-to-market strategies
|
||||
- Consider expansion and scaling paths
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Risk & Feasibility Research**
|
||||
|
||||
- Identify and assess various risk factors
|
||||
- Evaluate implementation challenges
|
||||
- Analyze resource requirements
|
||||
- Consider regulatory and legal implications
|
||||
|
||||
9. **Custom Research Focus**
|
||||
[[LLM: Allow user to define their own specific research focus.]]
|
||||
- User-defined research objectives
|
||||
- Specialized domain investigation
|
||||
- Cross-functional research needs
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Input Processing
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and any provided inputs (project brief, brainstorming results, etc.), extract relevant context and constraints.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**If Project Brief provided:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Extract key product concepts and goals
|
||||
@@ -118,11 +107,11 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Research Prompt Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the selected research type and context, collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: collaboratively develop a comprehensive research prompt with these components.
|
||||
|
||||
#### A. Research Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to articulate clear, specific objectives for the research.
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary research goal and purpose
|
||||
- Key decisions the research will inform
|
||||
@@ -131,7 +120,7 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
#### B. Research Questions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.]]
|
||||
CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to develop specific, actionable research questions organized by theme.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -147,8 +136,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
#### C. Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Specify appropriate research methods based on the type and objectives.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Data Collection Methods:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Secondary research sources
|
||||
@@ -165,8 +152,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
#### D. Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how research findings should be structured and presented.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Format Specifications:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Executive summary requirements
|
||||
@@ -183,8 +168,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Prompt Generation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Synthesize all elements into a comprehensive, ready-to-use research prompt.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Prompt Template:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
@@ -253,16 +236,12 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Review and Refinement
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Present the draft research prompt for user review and refinement.]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Present Complete Prompt**
|
||||
|
||||
- Show the full research prompt
|
||||
- Explain key elements and rationale
|
||||
- Highlight any assumptions made
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Gather Feedback**
|
||||
|
||||
- Are the objectives clear and correct?
|
||||
- Do the questions address all concerns?
|
||||
- Is the scope appropriate?
|
||||
@@ -276,8 +255,6 @@ Present these numbered options to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Next Steps Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide clear guidance on how to use the research prompt.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Use with AI Research Assistant**: Provide this prompt to an AI model with research capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,10 +8,9 @@ To identify the next logical story based on project progress and epic definition
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Load Core Configuration and Check Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml` from the project root
|
||||
- Load `{root}/core-config.yaml` from the project root
|
||||
- If the file does not exist, HALT and inform the user: "core-config.yaml not found. This file is required for story creation. You can either: 1) Copy it from GITHUB bmad-core/core-config.yaml and configure it for your project OR 2) Run the BMad installer against your project to upgrade and add the file automatically. Please add and configure core-config.yaml before proceeding."
|
||||
- Extract key configurations: `devStoryLocation`, `prd.*`, `architecture.*`, `workflow.*`
|
||||
- If `workflow.trackProgress: true`, use `utils/plan-management.md` to check plan sequence and warn if out of order
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify Next Story for Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,12 +102,11 @@ ALWAYS cite source documents: `[Source: architecture/{filename}.md#{section}]`
|
||||
- Verify all source references are included for technical details
|
||||
- Ensure tasks align with both epic requirements and architecture constraints
|
||||
- Update status to "Draft" and save the story file
|
||||
- If `workflow.trackProgress: true` and `workflow.updateOnCompletion: true`, call update-workflow-plan task to mark story creation step complete
|
||||
- Execute `tasks/execute-checklist` `checklists/story-draft-checklist`
|
||||
- Execute `{root}/tasks/execute-checklist` `{root}/checklists/story-draft-checklist`
|
||||
- Provide summary to user including:
|
||||
- Story created: `{devStoryLocation}/{epicNum}.{storyNum}.story.md`
|
||||
- Status: Draft
|
||||
- Key technical components included from architecture docs
|
||||
- Any deviations or conflicts noted between epic and architecture
|
||||
- Checklist Results
|
||||
- Next steps: For Complex stories, suggest the user carefully review the story draft and also optionally have the PO run the task `validate-next-story`
|
||||
- Next steps: For Complex stories, suggest the user carefully review the story draft and also optionally have the PO run the task `{root}/tasks/validate-next-story`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,289 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Create Workflow Plan Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Guide users through workflow selection and create a detailed plan document that outlines the selected workflow steps, decision points, and expected outputs. This task helps users understand what will happen before starting a complex workflow and provides a checklist to track progress.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Understand User's Goal
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Start with discovery questions to understand what the user wants to accomplish]]
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the user:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Project Type**:
|
||||
- Are you starting a new project (greenfield) or enhancing an existing one (brownfield)?
|
||||
- What type of application? (web app, service/API, UI only, full-stack)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **For Greenfield**:
|
||||
- Do you need a quick prototype or production-ready application?
|
||||
- Will this have a UI component?
|
||||
- Single service or multiple services?
|
||||
|
||||
3. **For Brownfield**:
|
||||
- What's the scope of the enhancement?
|
||||
- Single bug fix or small feature (few hours)
|
||||
- Small enhancement (1-3 stories)
|
||||
- Major feature requiring coordination
|
||||
- Architectural changes or modernization
|
||||
- Do you have existing documentation?
|
||||
- Are you following existing patterns or introducing new ones?
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Recommend Appropriate Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the answers, recommend:
|
||||
|
||||
**Greenfield Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `greenfield-fullstack` - Complete web application
|
||||
- `greenfield-service` - Backend API/service only
|
||||
- `greenfield-ui` - Frontend only
|
||||
|
||||
**Brownfield Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `brownfield-create-story` - Single small change
|
||||
- `brownfield-create-epic` - Small feature (1-3 stories)
|
||||
- `brownfield-fullstack` - Major enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
**Simplified Option:**
|
||||
|
||||
- For users unsure or wanting flexibility, suggest starting with individual agent tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Explain Selected Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Once workflow is selected, provide clear explanation]]
|
||||
|
||||
For the selected workflow, explain:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Overview**: What this workflow accomplishes
|
||||
2. **Duration**: Estimated time for planning phase
|
||||
3. **Outputs**: What documents will be created
|
||||
4. **Decision Points**: Where user input will be needed
|
||||
5. **Requirements**: What information should be ready
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Create Workflow Plan Document
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate a comprehensive plan document with the following structure]]
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Workflow Plan: {{Workflow Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- WORKFLOW-PLAN-META
|
||||
workflow-id: {{workflow-id}}
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
created: {{ISO-8601 timestamp}}
|
||||
updated: {{ISO-8601 timestamp}}
|
||||
version: 1.0
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
**Created Date**: {{current date}}
|
||||
**Project**: {{project name}}
|
||||
**Type**: {{greenfield/brownfield}}
|
||||
**Status**: Active
|
||||
**Estimated Planning Duration**: {{time estimate}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
{{Clear description of what will be accomplished}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Selected Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow**: `{{workflow-id}}`
|
||||
**Reason**: {{Why this workflow fits the user's needs}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Planning Phase
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Step 1: {{step name}} <!-- step-id: 1.1, agent: {{agent}}, task: {{task}} -->
|
||||
- **Agent**: {{agent name}}
|
||||
- **Action**: {{what happens}}
|
||||
- **Output**: {{what's created}}
|
||||
- **User Input**: {{if any}}
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Step 2: {{step name}} <!-- step-id: 1.2, agent: {{agent}}, task: {{task}} -->
|
||||
- **Agent**: {{agent name}}
|
||||
- **Action**: {{what happens}}
|
||||
- **Output**: {{what's created}}
|
||||
- **Decision Point**: {{if any}} <!-- decision-id: D1 -->
|
||||
|
||||
{{Continue for all planning steps}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Phase (IDE)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Document Sharding <!-- step-id: 2.1, agent: po, task: shard-doc -->
|
||||
- Prepare documents for story creation
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Story Development Cycle <!-- step-id: 2.2, repeats: true -->
|
||||
- [ ] Create story (SM agent) <!-- step-id: 2.2.1, agent: sm, task: create-next-story -->
|
||||
- [ ] Review story (optional) <!-- step-id: 2.2.2, agent: analyst, optional: true -->
|
||||
- [ ] Implement story (Dev agent) <!-- step-id: 2.2.3, agent: dev -->
|
||||
- [ ] QA review (optional) <!-- step-id: 2.2.4, agent: qa, optional: true -->
|
||||
- [ ] Repeat for all stories
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Epic Retrospective (optional) <!-- step-id: 2.3, agent: po, optional: true -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decision Points
|
||||
|
||||
1. **{{Decision Name}}** (Step {{n}}): <!-- decision-id: D1, status: pending -->
|
||||
- Trigger: {{what causes this decision}}
|
||||
- Options: {{available choices}}
|
||||
- Impact: {{how it affects the workflow}}
|
||||
- Decision Made: _Pending_
|
||||
|
||||
{{List all decision points}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Planning Documents
|
||||
- [ ] {{document 1}} - {{description}}
|
||||
- [ ] {{document 2}} - {{description}}
|
||||
{{etc...}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Artifacts
|
||||
- [ ] Stories in `docs/stories/`
|
||||
- [ ] Implementation code
|
||||
- [ ] Tests
|
||||
- [ ] Updated documentation
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before starting this workflow, ensure you have:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] {{prerequisite 1}}
|
||||
- [ ] {{prerequisite 2}}
|
||||
- [ ] {{prerequisite 3}}
|
||||
{{etc...}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Customization Options
|
||||
|
||||
Based on your project needs, you may:
|
||||
- Skip {{optional step}} if {{condition}}
|
||||
- Add {{additional step}} if {{condition}}
|
||||
- Choose {{alternative}} instead of {{default}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
{{For brownfield only}}
|
||||
- Integration complexity: {{assessment}}
|
||||
- Rollback strategy: {{approach}}
|
||||
- Testing requirements: {{special needs}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review this plan and confirm it matches your expectations
|
||||
2. Gather any missing prerequisites
|
||||
3. Start workflow with: `*task workflow {{workflow-id}}`
|
||||
4. Or begin with first agent: `@{{first-agent}}`
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
{{Any additional context or warnings}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*This plan can be updated as you progress through the workflow. Check off completed items to track progress.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Save and Present Plan
|
||||
|
||||
1. Save the plan as `docs/workflow-plan.md`
|
||||
2. Inform user: "Workflow plan created at docs/workflow-plan.md"
|
||||
3. Offer options:
|
||||
- Review the plan together
|
||||
- Start the workflow now
|
||||
- Gather prerequisites first
|
||||
- Modify the plan
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Plan Variations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Adjust plan detail based on workflow complexity]]
|
||||
|
||||
**For Simple Workflows** (create-story, create-epic):
|
||||
|
||||
- Simpler checklist format
|
||||
- Focus on immediate next steps
|
||||
- Less detailed explanations
|
||||
|
||||
**For Complex Workflows** (full greenfield/brownfield):
|
||||
|
||||
- Detailed step breakdowns
|
||||
- All decision points documented
|
||||
- Comprehensive output descriptions
|
||||
- Risk mitigation sections
|
||||
|
||||
**For Brownfield Workflows**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Include existing system impact analysis
|
||||
- Document integration checkpoints
|
||||
- Add rollback considerations
|
||||
- Note documentation dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Interactive Planning Mode
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If user wants to customize the workflow]]
|
||||
|
||||
If user wants to modify the standard workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present workflow steps as options
|
||||
2. Allow skipping optional steps
|
||||
3. Let user reorder certain steps
|
||||
4. Document customizations in plan
|
||||
5. Warn about dependencies if steps are skipped
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Execution Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
After plan is created, provide clear guidance:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Your workflow plan is ready! Here's how to proceed:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Review the plan**: Check that all steps align with your goals
|
||||
2. **Gather prerequisites**: Use the checklist to ensure you're ready
|
||||
3. **Start execution**:
|
||||
- Full workflow: `*task workflow {{workflow-id}}`
|
||||
- Step by step: Start with `@{{first-agent}}`
|
||||
4. **Track progress**: Check off steps in the plan as completed
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like to:
|
||||
a) Review the plan together
|
||||
b) Start the workflow now
|
||||
c) Gather prerequisites first
|
||||
d) Modify the plan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow plan is successful when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. User clearly understands what will happen
|
||||
2. All decision points are documented
|
||||
3. Prerequisites are identified
|
||||
4. Expected outputs are clear
|
||||
5. User feels confident to proceed
|
||||
6. Plan serves as useful progress tracker
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with BMad Master and Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
When used by BMad Master or BMad Orchestrator, this task should:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Be offered when user asks about workflows
|
||||
2. Be suggested before starting complex workflows
|
||||
3. Create a plan that the agent can reference during execution
|
||||
4. Allow the agent to track progress against the plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
User: "I need to add a payment system to my existing app"
|
||||
|
||||
BMad Orchestrator: "Let me help you create a workflow plan for that enhancement. I'll ask a few questions to recommend the best approach..."
|
||||
|
||||
[Runs through discovery questions]
|
||||
|
||||
BMad Orchestrator: "Based on your answers, I recommend the brownfield-fullstack workflow. Let me create a detailed plan for you..."
|
||||
|
||||
[Creates and saves plan]
|
||||
|
||||
BMad Orchestrator: "I've created a workflow plan at docs/workflow-plan.md. This shows all the steps we'll go through, what documents will be created, and where you'll need to make decisions. Would you like to review it together?"
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,143 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Document Migration Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Simple document migration that cleans up heading formats and adds epic structure for PRDs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Input**: User specifies the document to migrate (e.g., `docs/prd.md`)
|
||||
2. **Detection**: Automatically determine if it's a PRD or other document type
|
||||
3. **Migration**: Apply appropriate transformations
|
||||
4. **Backup**: Create backup with `.bak` extension
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
### For PRDs
|
||||
|
||||
- Find all level 3 headings that appear to be epics
|
||||
- Add a level 2 heading "## Epic #" (incrementing number) before each epic
|
||||
- Also apply the heading cleanup rules below
|
||||
|
||||
### For All Documents
|
||||
|
||||
- Find all level 2 headings (`## ...`)
|
||||
- Remove leading numbers and symbols
|
||||
- Keep only alphabetic characters and spaces
|
||||
- **CRITICAL**: Do not lose any information - preserve all content under appropriate headings
|
||||
- Examples:
|
||||
- `## 1. Foo & Bar` → `## Foo Bar`
|
||||
- `## 2.1 Technical Overview` → `## Technical Overview`
|
||||
- `## 3) User Experience` → `## User Experience`
|
||||
|
||||
### For Architecture Documents
|
||||
|
||||
- **PRIMARY GOAL**: Align level 2 headings to match template level 2 titles exactly
|
||||
- **PRESERVE EVERYTHING**: Do not lose any information during migration
|
||||
- Map existing content to the closest matching template section
|
||||
- If content doesn't fit template sections, create appropriate level 3 subsections
|
||||
|
||||
## Detection Logic
|
||||
|
||||
A document is considered a PRD if:
|
||||
|
||||
- Filename contains "prd" (case insensitive)
|
||||
- OR main title contains "Product Requirements" or "PRD"
|
||||
- OR contains sections like "User Stories", "Functional Requirements", "Acceptance Criteria"
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Backup Original**: Copy `filename.md` to `filename.md.bak`
|
||||
2. **Detect Type**: Check if document is a PRD
|
||||
3. **Process Headings**:
|
||||
- Clean all level 2 headings
|
||||
- If PRD: Add epic structure before level 3 headings that look like epics
|
||||
4. **Write Result**: Overwrite original file with migrated content
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic Detection for PRDs
|
||||
|
||||
Level 3 headings are treated as epics if they:
|
||||
|
||||
- Describe features or functionality
|
||||
- Are substantial sections (not just "Overview" or "Notes")
|
||||
- Common epic patterns: "User Management", "Payment Processing", "Reporting Dashboard"
|
||||
|
||||
The epic numbering starts at 1 and increments for each epic found.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
### Before (PRD):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Product Requirements Document
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.1 Functional Requirements & Specs
|
||||
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
### User Management System
|
||||
|
||||
Epic content...
|
||||
|
||||
### Payment Processing
|
||||
|
||||
Epic content...
|
||||
|
||||
## 3) Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### After (PRD):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Product Requirements Document
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
## Functional Requirements Specs
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic 1
|
||||
### User Management System
|
||||
Epic content...
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic 2
|
||||
### Payment Processing
|
||||
Epic content...
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
Content here...
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Before (Non-PRD):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. System Overview
|
||||
Content...
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.1 Technical Stack & Tools
|
||||
Content...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### After (Non-PRD):
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
## System Overview
|
||||
Content...
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Stack Tools
|
||||
Content...
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ Generate comprehensive documentation for existing projects optimized for AI deve
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Initial Project Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, check if a PRD or requirements document exists in context. If yes, use it to focus your documentation efforts on relevant areas only.
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** First, check if a PRD or requirements document exists in context. If yes, use it to focus your documentation efforts on relevant areas only.
|
||||
|
||||
**IF PRD EXISTS**:
|
||||
**IF PRD EXISTS**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review the PRD to understand what enhancement/feature is planned
|
||||
- Identify which modules, services, or areas will be affected
|
||||
@@ -56,11 +56,10 @@ Ask the user these elicitation questions to better understand their needs:
|
||||
- Are there any existing documentation standards or formats you prefer?
|
||||
- What level of technical detail should the documentation target? (junior developers, senior developers, mixed team)
|
||||
- Is there a specific feature or enhancement you're planning? (This helps focus documentation)
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Deep Codebase Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before generating documentation, conduct extensive analysis of the existing codebase:
|
||||
CRITICAL: Before generating documentation, conduct extensive analysis of the existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Explore Key Areas**:
|
||||
- Entry points (main files, index files, app initializers)
|
||||
@@ -83,13 +82,14 @@ Ask the user these elicitation questions to better understand their needs:
|
||||
- Document workarounds and technical debt
|
||||
- Note areas that differ from standard patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**IF PRD PROVIDED**: Also analyze what would need to change for the enhancement]]
|
||||
**IF PRD PROVIDED**: Also analyze what would need to change for the enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Core Documentation Generation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate a comprehensive BROWNFIELD architecture document that reflects the ACTUAL state of the codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: This is NOT an aspirational architecture document. Document what EXISTS, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- Technical debt and workarounds
|
||||
- Inconsistent patterns between different parts
|
||||
- Legacy code that can't be changed
|
||||
@@ -101,20 +101,24 @@ Ask the user these elicitation questions to better understand their needs:
|
||||
# [Project Name] Brownfield Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
This document captures the CURRENT STATE of the [Project Name] codebase, including technical debt, workarounds, and real-world patterns. It serves as a reference for AI agents working on enhancements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Document Scope
|
||||
|
||||
[If PRD provided: "Focused on areas relevant to: {enhancement description}"]
|
||||
[If no PRD: "Comprehensive documentation of entire system"]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
|------|---------|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| [Date] | 1.0 | Initial brownfield analysis | [Analyst] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| ------ | ------- | --------------------------- | --------- |
|
||||
| [Date] | 1.0 | Initial brownfield analysis | [Analyst] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference - Key Files and Entry Points
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Files for Understanding the System
|
||||
|
||||
- **Main Entry**: `src/index.js` (or actual entry point)
|
||||
- **Configuration**: `config/app.config.js`, `.env.example`
|
||||
- **Core Business Logic**: `src/services/`, `src/domain/`
|
||||
@@ -123,22 +127,25 @@ This document captures the CURRENT STATE of the [Project Name] codebase, includi
|
||||
- **Key Algorithms**: [List specific files with complex logic]
|
||||
|
||||
### If PRD Provided - Enhancement Impact Areas
|
||||
|
||||
[Highlight which files/modules will be affected by the planned enhancement]
|
||||
|
||||
## High Level Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Summary
|
||||
[Real assessment of architecture - mention if it's well-structured or has issues]
|
||||
|
||||
### Actual Tech Stack (from package.json/requirements.txt)
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|------------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| Runtime | Node.js | 16.x | [Any constraints] |
|
||||
| Framework | Express | 4.18.2 | [Custom middleware?] |
|
||||
| Database | PostgreSQL | 13 | [Connection pooling setup] |
|
||||
| [etc...] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Notes |
|
||||
| --------- | ---------- | ------- | -------------------------- |
|
||||
| Runtime | Node.js | 16.x | [Any constraints] |
|
||||
| Framework | Express | 4.18.2 | [Custom middleware?] |
|
||||
| Database | PostgreSQL | 13 | [Connection pooling setup] |
|
||||
|
||||
etc...
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Structure Reality Check
|
||||
|
||||
- Type: [Monorepo/Polyrepo/Hybrid]
|
||||
- Package Manager: [npm/yarn/pnpm]
|
||||
- Notable: [Any unusual structure decisions]
|
||||
@@ -146,7 +153,8 @@ This document captures the CURRENT STATE of the [Project Name] codebase, includi
|
||||
## Source Tree and Module Organization
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Structure (Actual)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
project-root/
|
||||
├── src/
|
||||
│ ├── controllers/ # HTTP request handlers
|
||||
@@ -160,6 +168,7 @@ project-root/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Modules and Their Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
- **User Management**: `src/services/userService.js` - Handles all user operations
|
||||
- **Authentication**: `src/middleware/auth.js` - JWT-based, custom implementation
|
||||
- **Payment Processing**: `src/legacy/payment.js` - CRITICAL: Do not refactor, tightly coupled
|
||||
@@ -168,12 +177,15 @@ project-root/
|
||||
## Data Models and APIs
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Models
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of duplicating, reference actual model files:
|
||||
|
||||
- **User Model**: See `src/models/User.js`
|
||||
- **Order Model**: See `src/models/Order.js`
|
||||
- **Related Types**: TypeScript definitions in `src/types/`
|
||||
|
||||
### API Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
- **OpenAPI Spec**: `docs/api/openapi.yaml` (if exists)
|
||||
- **Postman Collection**: `docs/api/postman-collection.json`
|
||||
- **Manual Endpoints**: [List any undocumented endpoints discovered]
|
||||
@@ -181,12 +193,14 @@ Instead of duplicating, reference actual model files:
|
||||
## Technical Debt and Known Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Technical Debt
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Payment Service**: Legacy code in `src/legacy/payment.js` - tightly coupled, no tests
|
||||
2. **User Service**: Different pattern than other services, uses callbacks instead of promises
|
||||
3. **Database Migrations**: Manually tracked, no proper migration tool
|
||||
4. **[Other significant debt]**
|
||||
|
||||
### Workarounds and Gotchas
|
||||
|
||||
- **Environment Variables**: Must set `NODE_ENV=production` even for staging (historical reason)
|
||||
- **Database Connections**: Connection pool hardcoded to 10, changing breaks payment service
|
||||
- **[Other workarounds developers need to know]**
|
||||
@@ -194,13 +208,16 @@ Instead of duplicating, reference actual model files:
|
||||
## Integration Points and External Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### External Services
|
||||
| Service | Purpose | Integration Type | Key Files |
|
||||
|---------|---------|------------------|-----------|
|
||||
| Stripe | Payments | REST API | `src/integrations/stripe/` |
|
||||
| SendGrid | Emails | SDK | `src/services/emailService.js` |
|
||||
| [etc...] |
|
||||
|
||||
| Service | Purpose | Integration Type | Key Files |
|
||||
| -------- | -------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------ |
|
||||
| Stripe | Payments | REST API | `src/integrations/stripe/` |
|
||||
| SendGrid | Emails | SDK | `src/services/emailService.js` |
|
||||
|
||||
etc...
|
||||
|
||||
### Internal Integration Points
|
||||
|
||||
- **Frontend Communication**: REST API on port 3000, expects specific headers
|
||||
- **Background Jobs**: Redis queue, see `src/workers/`
|
||||
- **[Other integrations]**
|
||||
@@ -208,11 +225,13 @@ Instead of duplicating, reference actual model files:
|
||||
## Development and Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
### Local Development Setup
|
||||
|
||||
1. Actual steps that work (not ideal steps)
|
||||
2. Known issues with setup
|
||||
3. Required environment variables (see `.env.example`)
|
||||
|
||||
### Build and Deployment Process
|
||||
|
||||
- **Build Command**: `npm run build` (webpack config in `webpack.config.js`)
|
||||
- **Deployment**: Manual deployment via `scripts/deploy.sh`
|
||||
- **Environments**: Dev, Staging, Prod (see `config/environments/`)
|
||||
@@ -220,12 +239,14 @@ Instead of duplicating, reference actual model files:
|
||||
## Testing Reality
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Test Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
- Unit Tests: 60% coverage (Jest)
|
||||
- Integration Tests: Minimal, in `tests/integration/`
|
||||
- E2E Tests: None
|
||||
- Manual Testing: Primary QA method
|
||||
|
||||
### Running Tests
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm test # Runs unit tests
|
||||
npm run test:integration # Runs integration tests (requires local DB)
|
||||
@@ -234,18 +255,22 @@ npm run test:integration # Runs integration tests (requires local DB)
|
||||
## If Enhancement PRD Provided - Impact Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Files That Will Need Modification
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the enhancement requirements, these files will be affected:
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/services/userService.js` - Add new user fields
|
||||
- `src/models/User.js` - Update schema
|
||||
- `src/routes/userRoutes.js` - New endpoints
|
||||
- [etc...]
|
||||
|
||||
### New Files/Modules Needed
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/services/newFeatureService.js` - New business logic
|
||||
- `src/models/NewFeature.js` - New data model
|
||||
- [etc...]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Will need to integrate with existing auth middleware
|
||||
- Must follow existing response format in `src/utils/responseFormatter.js`
|
||||
- [Other integration points]
|
||||
@@ -253,6 +278,7 @@ Based on the enhancement requirements, these files will be affected:
|
||||
## Appendix - Useful Commands and Scripts
|
||||
|
||||
### Frequently Used Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm run dev # Start development server
|
||||
npm run build # Production build
|
||||
@@ -261,14 +287,13 @@ npm run seed # Seed test data
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Debugging and Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
- **Logs**: Check `logs/app.log` for application logs
|
||||
- **Debug Mode**: Set `DEBUG=app:*` for verbose logging
|
||||
- **Common Issues**: See `docs/troubleshooting.md`]]
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Document Delivery
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After generating the complete architecture document:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **In Web UI (Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude)**:
|
||||
- Present the entire document in one response (or multiple if too long)
|
||||
- Tell user to copy and save as `docs/brownfield-architecture.md` or `docs/project-architecture.md`
|
||||
@@ -280,6 +305,7 @@ npm run seed # Seed test data
|
||||
- Can be sharded later using PO agent if desired
|
||||
|
||||
The document should be comprehensive enough that future agents can understand:
|
||||
|
||||
- The actual state of the system (not idealized)
|
||||
- Where to find key files and logic
|
||||
- What technical debt exists
|
||||
@@ -288,7 +314,7 @@ The document should be comprehensive enough that future agents can understand:
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before finalizing the document:
|
||||
CRITICAL: Before finalizing the document:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Accuracy Check**: Verify all technical details match the actual codebase
|
||||
2. **Completeness Review**: Ensure all major system components are documented
|
||||
@@ -296,7 +322,7 @@ The document should be comprehensive enough that future agents can understand:
|
||||
4. **Clarity Assessment**: Check that explanations are clear for AI agents
|
||||
5. **Navigation**: Ensure document has clear section structure for easy reference
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the advanced elicitation task after major sections to refine based on user feedback.]]
|
||||
Apply the advanced elicitation task after major sections to refine based on user feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -314,4 +340,4 @@ Apply the advanced elicitation task after major sections to refine based on user
|
||||
- References actual files rather than duplicating content when possible
|
||||
- Documents technical debt, workarounds, and constraints honestly
|
||||
- For brownfield projects with PRD: Provides clear enhancement impact analysis
|
||||
- The goal is PRACTICAL documentation for AI agents doing real work
|
||||
- The goal is PRACTICAL documentation for AI agents doing real work
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
docOutputLocation: docs/brainstorming-session-results.md
|
||||
template: brainstorming-output-tmpl
|
||||
template: "{root}/templates/brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Facilitate Brainstorming Session Task
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Ask 4 context questions (don't preview what happens next):
|
||||
1. What are we brainstorming about?
|
||||
2. Any constraints or parameters?
|
||||
3. Goal: broad exploration or focused ideation?
|
||||
4. Do you want a structured document output to reference later? (Y/N)
|
||||
4. Do you want a structured document output to reference later? (Default Yes)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Present Approach Options
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,17 +33,17 @@ After getting answers to Step 1, present 4 approach options (numbered):
|
||||
|
||||
- **FACILITATOR ROLE**: Guide user to generate their own ideas through questions, prompts, and examples
|
||||
- **CONTINUOUS ENGAGEMENT**: Keep user engaged with chosen technique until they want to switch or are satisfied
|
||||
- **CAPTURE OUTPUT**: If document output requested, capture all ideas generated in each technique section
|
||||
- **CAPTURE OUTPUT**: If (default) document output requested, capture all ideas generated in each technique section to the document from the beginning.
|
||||
|
||||
**Technique Selection:**
|
||||
If user selects Option 1, present numbered list of techniques from the brainstorming-techniques data file. User can select by number (e.g., "7" for Mind Mapping).
|
||||
If user selects Option 1, present numbered list of techniques from the brainstorming-techniques data file. User can select by number..
|
||||
|
||||
**Technique Execution:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Apply selected technique according to data file description
|
||||
2. Keep engaging with technique until user indicates they want to:
|
||||
- Choose a different technique
|
||||
- Apply current ideas to a new technique
|
||||
- Apply current ideas to a new technique
|
||||
- Move to convergent phase
|
||||
- End session
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Generate structured document with these sections:
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **YOU ARE A FACILITATOR**: Guide the user to brainstorm, don't brainstorm for them
|
||||
- **YOU ARE A FACILITATOR**: Guide the user to brainstorm, don't brainstorm for them (unless they request it persistently)
|
||||
- **INTERACTIVE DIALOGUE**: Ask questions, wait for responses, build on their ideas
|
||||
- **ONE TECHNIQUE AT A TIME**: Don't mix multiple techniques in one response
|
||||
- **CONTINUOUS ENGAGEMENT**: Stay with one technique until user wants to switch
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Generate structured document with these sections:
|
||||
- Defer judgment during generation
|
||||
- Quantity leads to quality (aim for 100 ideas in 60 minutes)
|
||||
- Build on ideas collaboratively
|
||||
- Document everything if output requested
|
||||
- Document everything in output document
|
||||
|
||||
## Advanced Engagement Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ To generate a masterful, comprehensive, and optimized prompt that can be used wi
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- Completed UI/UX Specification (`front-end-spec`)
|
||||
- Completed UI/UX Specification (`front-end-spec.md`)
|
||||
- Completed Frontend Architecture Document (`front-end-architecture`) or a full stack combined architecture such as `architecture.md`
|
||||
- Main System Architecture Document (`architecture` - for API contracts and tech stack to give further context)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,14 +11,12 @@ You are now operating as a Documentation Indexer. Your goal is to ensure all doc
|
||||
### Required Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. First, locate and scan:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `docs/` directory and all subdirectories
|
||||
- The existing `docs/index.md` file (create if absent)
|
||||
- All markdown (`.md`) and text (`.txt`) files in the documentation structure
|
||||
- Note the folder structure for hierarchical organization
|
||||
|
||||
2. For the existing `docs/index.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
- Parse current entries
|
||||
- Note existing file references and descriptions
|
||||
- Identify any broken links or missing files
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +24,6 @@ You are now operating as a Documentation Indexer. Your goal is to ensure all doc
|
||||
- Preserve existing folder sections
|
||||
|
||||
3. For each documentation file found:
|
||||
|
||||
- Extract the title (from first heading or filename)
|
||||
- Generate a brief description by analyzing the content
|
||||
- Create a relative markdown link to the file
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +32,6 @@ You are now operating as a Documentation Indexer. Your goal is to ensure all doc
|
||||
- If missing or outdated, prepare an update
|
||||
|
||||
4. For any missing or non-existent files found in index:
|
||||
|
||||
- Present a list of all entries that reference non-existent files
|
||||
- For each entry:
|
||||
- Show the full entry details (title, path, description)
|
||||
@@ -88,7 +84,6 @@ Documents within the `another-folder/` directory:
|
||||
### [Nested Document](./another-folder/document.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Description of nested document.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Index Entry Format
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +152,6 @@ For each file referenced in the index but not found in the filesystem:
|
||||
### Special Cases
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Sharded Documents**: If a folder contains an `index.md` file, treat it as a sharded document:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use the folder's `index.md` title as the section title
|
||||
- List the folder's documents as subsections
|
||||
- Note in the description that this is a multi-part document
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# KB Mode Interaction Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Provide a user-friendly interface to the BMad knowledge base without overwhelming users with information upfront.
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
When entering KB mode (*kb-mode), follow these steps:
|
||||
When entering KB mode (\*kb-mode), follow these steps:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Welcome and Guide
|
||||
Announce entering KB mode with a brief, friendly introduction:
|
||||
|
||||
"I've entered KB mode and have access to the full BMad knowledge base. I can help you with detailed information about any aspect of BMad-Method."
|
||||
Announce entering KB mode with a brief, friendly introduction.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Present Topic Areas
|
||||
|
||||
Offer a concise list of main topic areas the user might want to explore:
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to know more about?**
|
||||
@@ -29,26 +30,30 @@ Offer a concise list of main topic areas the user might want to explore:
|
||||
Or ask me about anything else related to BMad-Method!
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Respond Contextually
|
||||
|
||||
- Wait for user's specific question or topic selection
|
||||
- Provide focused, relevant information from the knowledge base
|
||||
- Offer to dive deeper or explore related topics
|
||||
- Keep responses concise unless user asks for detailed explanations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Interactive Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
- After answering, suggest related topics they might find helpful
|
||||
- Maintain conversational flow rather than data dumping
|
||||
- Use examples when appropriate
|
||||
- Reference specific documentation sections when relevant
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Exit Gracefully
|
||||
|
||||
When user is done or wants to exit KB mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Summarize key points discussed if helpful
|
||||
- Remind them they can return to KB mode anytime with *kb-mode
|
||||
- Remind them they can return to KB mode anytime with \*kb-mode
|
||||
- Suggest next steps based on what was discussed
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Interaction
|
||||
|
||||
**User**: *kb-mode
|
||||
**User**: \*kb-mode
|
||||
|
||||
**Assistant**: I've entered KB mode and have access to the full BMad knowledge base. I can help you with detailed information about any aspect of BMad-Method.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -67,4 +72,4 @@ Or ask me about anything else related to BMad-Method!
|
||||
|
||||
**User**: Tell me about workflows
|
||||
|
||||
**Assistant**: [Provides focused information about workflows from the KB, then offers to explore specific workflow types or related topics]
|
||||
**Assistant**: [Provides focused information about workflows from the KB, then offers to explore specific workflow types or related topics]
|
||||
|
||||
315
bmad-core/tasks/nfr-assess.md
Normal file
315
bmad-core/tasks/nfr-assess.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
|
||||
# nfr-assess
|
||||
|
||||
Quick NFR validation focused on the core four: security, performance, reliability, maintainability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- story_id: "{epic}.{story}" # e.g., "1.3"
|
||||
- story_path: "docs/stories/{epic}.{story}.*.md"
|
||||
|
||||
optional:
|
||||
- architecture_refs: "docs/architecture/*.md"
|
||||
- technical_preferences: "docs/technical-preferences.md"
|
||||
- acceptance_criteria: From story file
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Assess non-functional requirements for a story and generate:
|
||||
1. YAML block for the gate file's `nfr_validation` section
|
||||
2. Brief markdown assessment saved to `docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Fail-safe for Missing Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
If story_path or story file can't be found:
|
||||
- Still create assessment file with note: "Source story not found"
|
||||
- Set all selected NFRs to CONCERNS with notes: "Target unknown / evidence missing"
|
||||
- Continue with assessment to provide value
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Elicit Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**Interactive mode:** Ask which NFRs to assess
|
||||
**Non-interactive mode:** Default to core four (security, performance, reliability, maintainability)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Which NFRs should I assess? (Enter numbers or press Enter for default)
|
||||
[1] Security (default)
|
||||
[2] Performance (default)
|
||||
[3] Reliability (default)
|
||||
[4] Maintainability (default)
|
||||
[5] Usability
|
||||
[6] Compatibility
|
||||
[7] Portability
|
||||
[8] Functional Suitability
|
||||
|
||||
> [Enter for 1-4]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Check for Thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
Look for NFR requirements in:
|
||||
- Story acceptance criteria
|
||||
- `docs/architecture/*.md` files
|
||||
- `docs/technical-preferences.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Interactive mode:** Ask for missing thresholds
|
||||
**Non-interactive mode:** Mark as CONCERNS with "Target unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
No performance requirements found. What's your target response time?
|
||||
> 200ms for API calls
|
||||
|
||||
No security requirements found. Required auth method?
|
||||
> JWT with refresh tokens
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Unknown targets policy:** If a target is missing and not provided, mark status as CONCERNS with notes: "Target unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Quick Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
For each selected NFR, check:
|
||||
- Is there evidence it's implemented?
|
||||
- Can we validate it?
|
||||
- Are there obvious gaps?
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 1: Gate YAML Block
|
||||
|
||||
Generate ONLY for NFRs actually assessed (no placeholders):
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# Gate YAML (copy/paste):
|
||||
nfr_validation:
|
||||
_assessed: [security, performance, reliability, maintainability]
|
||||
security:
|
||||
status: CONCERNS
|
||||
notes: "No rate limiting on auth endpoints"
|
||||
performance:
|
||||
status: PASS
|
||||
notes: "Response times < 200ms verified"
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
status: PASS
|
||||
notes: "Error handling and retries implemented"
|
||||
maintainability:
|
||||
status: CONCERNS
|
||||
notes: "Test coverage at 65%, target is 80%"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Deterministic Status Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **FAIL**: Any selected NFR has critical gap or target clearly not met
|
||||
- **CONCERNS**: No FAILs, but any NFR is unknown/partial/missing evidence
|
||||
- **PASS**: All selected NFRs meet targets with evidence
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Score Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
quality_score = 100
|
||||
- 20 for each FAIL attribute
|
||||
- 10 for each CONCERNS attribute
|
||||
Floor at 0, ceiling at 100
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If `technical-preferences.md` defines custom weights, use those instead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 2: Brief Assessment Report
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS save to:** `docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# NFR Assessment: {epic}.{story}
|
||||
Date: {date}
|
||||
Reviewer: Quinn
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Note: Source story not found (if applicable) -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- Security: CONCERNS - Missing rate limiting
|
||||
- Performance: PASS - Meets <200ms requirement
|
||||
- Reliability: PASS - Proper error handling
|
||||
- Maintainability: CONCERNS - Test coverage below target
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Issues
|
||||
1. **No rate limiting** (Security)
|
||||
- Risk: Brute force attacks possible
|
||||
- Fix: Add rate limiting middleware to auth endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Test coverage 65%** (Maintainability)
|
||||
- Risk: Untested code paths
|
||||
- Fix: Add tests for uncovered branches
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Wins
|
||||
- Add rate limiting: ~2 hours
|
||||
- Increase test coverage: ~4 hours
|
||||
- Add performance monitoring: ~1 hour
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 3: Story Update Line
|
||||
|
||||
**End with this line for the review task to quote:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
NFR assessment: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 4: Gate Integration Line
|
||||
|
||||
**Always print at the end:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Gate NFR block ready → paste into docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml under nfr_validation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Assessment Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Security
|
||||
**PASS if:**
|
||||
- Authentication implemented
|
||||
- Authorization enforced
|
||||
- Input validation present
|
||||
- No hardcoded secrets
|
||||
|
||||
**CONCERNS if:**
|
||||
- Missing rate limiting
|
||||
- Weak encryption
|
||||
- Incomplete authorization
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL if:**
|
||||
- No authentication
|
||||
- Hardcoded credentials
|
||||
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
**PASS if:**
|
||||
- Meets response time targets
|
||||
- No obvious bottlenecks
|
||||
- Reasonable resource usage
|
||||
|
||||
**CONCERNS if:**
|
||||
- Close to limits
|
||||
- Missing indexes
|
||||
- No caching strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL if:**
|
||||
- Exceeds response time limits
|
||||
- Memory leaks
|
||||
- Unoptimized queries
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
**PASS if:**
|
||||
- Error handling present
|
||||
- Graceful degradation
|
||||
- Retry logic where needed
|
||||
|
||||
**CONCERNS if:**
|
||||
- Some error cases unhandled
|
||||
- No circuit breakers
|
||||
- Missing health checks
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL if:**
|
||||
- No error handling
|
||||
- Crashes on errors
|
||||
- No recovery mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
### Maintainability
|
||||
**PASS if:**
|
||||
- Test coverage meets target
|
||||
- Code well-structured
|
||||
- Documentation present
|
||||
|
||||
**CONCERNS if:**
|
||||
- Test coverage below target
|
||||
- Some code duplication
|
||||
- Missing documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL if:**
|
||||
- No tests
|
||||
- Highly coupled code
|
||||
- No documentation
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### What to Check
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
security:
|
||||
- Authentication mechanism
|
||||
- Authorization checks
|
||||
- Input validation
|
||||
- Secret management
|
||||
- Rate limiting
|
||||
|
||||
performance:
|
||||
- Response times
|
||||
- Database queries
|
||||
- Caching usage
|
||||
- Resource consumption
|
||||
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
- Error handling
|
||||
- Retry logic
|
||||
- Circuit breakers
|
||||
- Health checks
|
||||
- Logging
|
||||
|
||||
maintainability:
|
||||
- Test coverage
|
||||
- Code structure
|
||||
- Documentation
|
||||
- Dependencies
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on the core four NFRs by default
|
||||
- Quick assessment, not deep analysis
|
||||
- Gate-ready output format
|
||||
- Brief, actionable findings
|
||||
- Skip what doesn't apply
|
||||
- Deterministic status rules for consistency
|
||||
- Unknown targets → CONCERNS, not guesses
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix: ISO 25010 Reference
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>Full ISO 25010 Quality Model (click to expand)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
### All 8 Quality Characteristics
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Functional Suitability**: Completeness, correctness, appropriateness
|
||||
2. **Performance Efficiency**: Time behavior, resource use, capacity
|
||||
3. **Compatibility**: Co-existence, interoperability
|
||||
4. **Usability**: Learnability, operability, accessibility
|
||||
5. **Reliability**: Maturity, availability, fault tolerance
|
||||
6. **Security**: Confidentiality, integrity, authenticity
|
||||
7. **Maintainability**: Modularity, reusability, testability
|
||||
8. **Portability**: Adaptability, installability
|
||||
|
||||
Use these when assessing beyond the core four.
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>Example: Deep Performance Analysis (click to expand)</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
performance_deep_dive:
|
||||
response_times:
|
||||
p50: 45ms
|
||||
p95: 180ms
|
||||
p99: 350ms
|
||||
database:
|
||||
slow_queries: 2
|
||||
missing_indexes: ["users.email", "orders.user_id"]
|
||||
caching:
|
||||
hit_rate: 0%
|
||||
recommendation: "Add Redis for session data"
|
||||
load_test:
|
||||
max_rps: 150
|
||||
breaking_point: 200 rps
|
||||
```
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
159
bmad-core/tasks/qa-gate.md
Normal file
159
bmad-core/tasks/qa-gate.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
|
||||
# qa-gate
|
||||
|
||||
Create or update a quality gate decision file for a story based on review findings.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Generate a standalone quality gate file that provides a clear pass/fail decision with actionable feedback. This gate serves as an advisory checkpoint for teams to understand quality status.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- Story has been reviewed (manually or via review-story task)
|
||||
- Review findings are available
|
||||
- Understanding of story requirements and implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate File Location
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS** create file at: `docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml`
|
||||
|
||||
Slug rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- Convert to lowercase
|
||||
- Replace spaces with hyphens
|
||||
- Strip punctuation
|
||||
- Example: "User Auth - Login!" becomes "user-auth-login"
|
||||
|
||||
## Minimal Required Schema
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: 1
|
||||
story: "{epic}.{story}"
|
||||
gate: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED
|
||||
status_reason: "1-2 sentence explanation of gate decision"
|
||||
reviewer: "Quinn"
|
||||
updated: "{ISO-8601 timestamp}"
|
||||
top_issues: [] # Empty array if no issues
|
||||
waiver: { active: false } # Only set active: true if WAIVED
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Schema with Issues
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: 1
|
||||
story: "1.3"
|
||||
gate: CONCERNS
|
||||
status_reason: "Missing rate limiting on auth endpoints poses security risk."
|
||||
reviewer: "Quinn"
|
||||
updated: "2025-01-12T10:15:00Z"
|
||||
top_issues:
|
||||
- id: "SEC-001"
|
||||
severity: high # ONLY: low|medium|high
|
||||
finding: "No rate limiting on login endpoint"
|
||||
suggested_action: "Add rate limiting middleware before production"
|
||||
- id: "TEST-001"
|
||||
severity: medium
|
||||
finding: "No integration tests for auth flow"
|
||||
suggested_action: "Add integration test coverage"
|
||||
waiver: { active: false }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Schema when Waived
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: 1
|
||||
story: "1.3"
|
||||
gate: WAIVED
|
||||
status_reason: "Known issues accepted for MVP release."
|
||||
reviewer: "Quinn"
|
||||
updated: "2025-01-12T10:15:00Z"
|
||||
top_issues:
|
||||
- id: "PERF-001"
|
||||
severity: low
|
||||
finding: "Dashboard loads slowly with 1000+ items"
|
||||
suggested_action: "Implement pagination in next sprint"
|
||||
waiver:
|
||||
active: true
|
||||
reason: "MVP release - performance optimization deferred"
|
||||
approved_by: "Product Owner"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Decision Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### PASS
|
||||
|
||||
- All acceptance criteria met
|
||||
- No high-severity issues
|
||||
- Test coverage meets project standards
|
||||
|
||||
### CONCERNS
|
||||
|
||||
- Non-blocking issues present
|
||||
- Should be tracked and scheduled
|
||||
- Can proceed with awareness
|
||||
|
||||
### FAIL
|
||||
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria not met
|
||||
- High-severity issues present
|
||||
- Recommend return to InProgress
|
||||
|
||||
### WAIVED
|
||||
|
||||
- Issues explicitly accepted
|
||||
- Requires approval and reason
|
||||
- Proceed despite known issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Severity Scale
|
||||
|
||||
**FIXED VALUES - NO VARIATIONS:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `low`: Minor issues, cosmetic problems
|
||||
- `medium`: Should fix soon, not blocking
|
||||
- `high`: Critical issues, should block release
|
||||
|
||||
## Issue ID Prefixes
|
||||
|
||||
- `SEC-`: Security issues
|
||||
- `PERF-`: Performance issues
|
||||
- `REL-`: Reliability issues
|
||||
- `TEST-`: Testing gaps
|
||||
- `MNT-`: Maintainability concerns
|
||||
- `ARCH-`: Architecture issues
|
||||
- `DOC-`: Documentation gaps
|
||||
- `REQ-`: Requirements issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
1. **ALWAYS** create gate file at: `docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml`
|
||||
2. **ALWAYS** append this exact format to story's QA Results section:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Gate: {STATUS} → docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml
|
||||
```
|
||||
3. Keep status_reason to 1-2 sentences maximum
|
||||
4. Use severity values exactly: `low`, `medium`, or `high`
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Story Update
|
||||
|
||||
After creating gate file, append to story's QA Results section:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## QA Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Date: 2025-01-12
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed By: Quinn (Test Architect)
|
||||
|
||||
[... existing review content ...]
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Status
|
||||
|
||||
Gate: CONCERNS → docs/qa/gates/1.3-user-auth-login.yml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep it minimal and predictable
|
||||
- Fixed severity scale (low/medium/high)
|
||||
- Always write to standard path
|
||||
- Always update story with gate reference
|
||||
- Clear, actionable findings
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,16 @@
|
||||
# review-story
|
||||
|
||||
When a developer marks a story as "Ready for Review", perform a comprehensive senior developer code review with the ability to refactor and improve code directly.
|
||||
Perform a comprehensive test architecture review with quality gate decision. This adaptive, risk-aware review creates both a story update and a detailed gate file.
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: QA Agent executing review-story task as Senior Developer]]
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- story_id: "{epic}.{story}" # e.g., "1.3"
|
||||
- story_path: "{devStoryLocation}/{epic}.{story}.*.md" # Path from core-config.yaml
|
||||
- story_title: "{title}" # If missing, derive from story file H1
|
||||
- story_slug: "{slug}" # If missing, derive from title (lowercase, hyphenated)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,98 +18,133 @@ When a developer marks a story as "Ready for Review", perform a comprehensive se
|
||||
- Developer has completed all tasks and updated the File List
|
||||
- All automated tests are passing
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Process
|
||||
## Review Process - Adaptive Test Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read the Complete Story**
|
||||
- Review all acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Understand the dev notes and requirements
|
||||
- Note any completion notes from the developer
|
||||
### 1. Risk Assessment (Determines Review Depth)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Verify Implementation Against Dev Notes Guidance**
|
||||
- Review the "Dev Notes" section for specific technical guidance provided to the developer
|
||||
- Verify the developer's implementation follows the architectural patterns specified in Dev Notes
|
||||
- Check that file locations match the project structure guidance in Dev Notes
|
||||
- Confirm any specified libraries, frameworks, or technical approaches were used correctly
|
||||
- Validate that security considerations mentioned in Dev Notes were implemented
|
||||
**Auto-escalate to deep review when:**
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Focus on the File List**
|
||||
- Verify all files listed were actually created/modified
|
||||
- Check for any missing files that should have been updated
|
||||
- Ensure file locations align with the project structure guidance from Dev Notes
|
||||
- Auth/payment/security files touched
|
||||
- No tests added to story
|
||||
- Diff > 500 lines
|
||||
- Previous gate was FAIL/CONCERNS
|
||||
- Story has > 5 acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Senior Developer Code Review**
|
||||
- Review code with the eye of a senior developer
|
||||
- If changes form a cohesive whole, review them together
|
||||
- If changes are independent, review incrementally file by file
|
||||
- Focus on:
|
||||
- Code architecture and design patterns
|
||||
- Refactoring opportunities
|
||||
- Code duplication or inefficiencies
|
||||
- Performance optimizations
|
||||
- Security concerns
|
||||
- Best practices and patterns
|
||||
### 2. Comprehensive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Active Refactoring**
|
||||
- As a senior developer, you CAN and SHOULD refactor code where improvements are needed
|
||||
- When refactoring:
|
||||
- Make the changes directly in the files
|
||||
- Explain WHY you're making the change
|
||||
- Describe HOW the change improves the code
|
||||
- Ensure all tests still pass after refactoring
|
||||
- Update the File List if you modify additional files
|
||||
**A. Requirements Traceability**
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Standards Compliance Check**
|
||||
- Verify adherence to `docs/coding-standards.md`
|
||||
- Check compliance with `docs/unified-project-structure.md`
|
||||
- Validate testing approach against `docs/testing-strategy.md`
|
||||
- Ensure all guidelines mentioned in the story are followed
|
||||
- Map each acceptance criteria to its validating tests (document mapping with Given-When-Then, not test code)
|
||||
- Identify coverage gaps
|
||||
- Verify all requirements have corresponding test cases
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Acceptance Criteria Validation**
|
||||
- Verify each AC is fully implemented
|
||||
- Check for any missing functionality
|
||||
- Validate edge cases are handled
|
||||
**B. Code Quality Review**
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Test Coverage Review**
|
||||
- Ensure unit tests cover edge cases
|
||||
- Add missing tests if critical coverage is lacking
|
||||
- Verify integration tests (if required) are comprehensive
|
||||
- Check that test assertions are meaningful
|
||||
- Look for missing test scenarios
|
||||
- Architecture and design patterns
|
||||
- Refactoring opportunities (and perform them)
|
||||
- Code duplication or inefficiencies
|
||||
- Performance optimizations
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Best practices adherence
|
||||
|
||||
9. **Documentation and Comments**
|
||||
- Verify code is self-documenting where possible
|
||||
- Add comments for complex logic if missing
|
||||
- Ensure any API changes are documented
|
||||
**C. Test Architecture Assessment**
|
||||
|
||||
## Update Story File - QA Results Section ONLY
|
||||
- Test coverage adequacy at appropriate levels
|
||||
- Test level appropriateness (what should be unit vs integration vs e2e)
|
||||
- Test design quality and maintainability
|
||||
- Test data management strategy
|
||||
- Mock/stub usage appropriateness
|
||||
- Edge case and error scenario coverage
|
||||
- Test execution time and reliability
|
||||
|
||||
**D. Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Security: Authentication, authorization, data protection
|
||||
- Performance: Response times, resource usage
|
||||
- Reliability: Error handling, recovery mechanisms
|
||||
- Maintainability: Code clarity, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**E. Testability Evaluation**
|
||||
|
||||
- Controllability: Can we control the inputs?
|
||||
- Observability: Can we observe the outputs?
|
||||
- Debuggability: Can we debug failures easily?
|
||||
|
||||
**F. Technical Debt Identification**
|
||||
|
||||
- Accumulated shortcuts
|
||||
- Missing tests
|
||||
- Outdated dependencies
|
||||
- Architecture violations
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Active Refactoring
|
||||
|
||||
- Refactor code where safe and appropriate
|
||||
- Run tests to ensure changes don't break functionality
|
||||
- Document all changes in QA Results section with clear WHY and HOW
|
||||
- Do NOT alter story content beyond QA Results section
|
||||
- Do NOT change story Status or File List; recommend next status only
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Standards Compliance Check
|
||||
|
||||
- Verify adherence to `docs/coding-standards.md`
|
||||
- Check compliance with `docs/unified-project-structure.md`
|
||||
- Validate testing approach against `docs/testing-strategy.md`
|
||||
- Ensure all guidelines mentioned in the story are followed
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Acceptance Criteria Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- Verify each AC is fully implemented
|
||||
- Check for any missing functionality
|
||||
- Validate edge cases are handled
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Documentation and Comments
|
||||
|
||||
- Verify code is self-documenting where possible
|
||||
- Add comments for complex logic if missing
|
||||
- Ensure any API changes are documented
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 1: Update Story File - QA Results Section ONLY
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: You are ONLY authorized to update the "QA Results" section of the story file. DO NOT modify any other sections.
|
||||
|
||||
**QA Results Anchor Rule:**
|
||||
|
||||
- If `## QA Results` doesn't exist, append it at end of file
|
||||
- If it exists, append a new dated entry below existing entries
|
||||
- Never edit other sections
|
||||
|
||||
After review and any refactoring, append your results to the story file in the QA Results section:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## QA Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Date: [Date]
|
||||
### Reviewed By: Quinn (Senior Developer QA)
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed By: Quinn (Test Architect)
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Overall assessment of implementation quality]
|
||||
|
||||
### Refactoring Performed
|
||||
|
||||
[List any refactoring you performed with explanations]
|
||||
|
||||
- **File**: [filename]
|
||||
- **Change**: [what was changed]
|
||||
- **Why**: [reason for change]
|
||||
- **How**: [how it improves the code]
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance Check
|
||||
|
||||
- Coding Standards: [✓/✗] [notes if any]
|
||||
- Project Structure: [✓/✗] [notes if any]
|
||||
- Testing Strategy: [✓/✗] [notes if any]
|
||||
- All ACs Met: [✓/✗] [notes if any]
|
||||
|
||||
### Improvements Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
[Check off items you handled yourself, leave unchecked for dev to address]
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Refactored user service for better error handling (services/user.service.ts)
|
||||
@@ -111,26 +154,149 @@ After review and any refactoring, append your results to the story file in the Q
|
||||
- [ ] Update API documentation for new error codes
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Review
|
||||
|
||||
[Any security concerns found and whether addressed]
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[Any performance issues found and whether addressed]
|
||||
|
||||
### Final Status
|
||||
[✓ Approved - Ready for Done] / [✗ Changes Required - See unchecked items above]
|
||||
### Files Modified During Review
|
||||
|
||||
[If you modified files, list them here - ask Dev to update File List]
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Status
|
||||
|
||||
Gate: {STATUS} → docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml
|
||||
Risk profile: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-risk-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
NFR assessment: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-nfr-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
|
||||
# Note: Paths should reference core-config.yaml for custom configurations
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Status
|
||||
|
||||
[✓ Ready for Done] / [✗ Changes Required - See unchecked items above]
|
||||
(Story owner decides final status)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output 2: Create Quality Gate File
|
||||
|
||||
**Template and Directory:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Render from `templates/qa-gate-tmpl.yaml`
|
||||
- Create `docs/qa/gates/` directory if missing (or configure in core-config.yaml)
|
||||
- Save to: `docs/qa/gates/{epic}.{story}-{slug}.yml`
|
||||
|
||||
Gate file structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
schema: 1
|
||||
story: "{epic}.{story}"
|
||||
story_title: "{story title}"
|
||||
gate: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED
|
||||
status_reason: "1-2 sentence explanation of gate decision"
|
||||
reviewer: "Quinn (Test Architect)"
|
||||
updated: "{ISO-8601 timestamp}"
|
||||
|
||||
top_issues: [] # Empty if no issues
|
||||
waiver: { active: false } # Set active: true only if WAIVED
|
||||
|
||||
# Extended fields (optional but recommended):
|
||||
quality_score: 0-100 # 100 - (20*FAILs) - (10*CONCERNS) or use technical-preferences.md weights
|
||||
expires: "{ISO-8601 timestamp}" # Typically 2 weeks from review
|
||||
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
tests_reviewed: { count }
|
||||
risks_identified: { count }
|
||||
trace:
|
||||
ac_covered: [1, 2, 3] # AC numbers with test coverage
|
||||
ac_gaps: [4] # AC numbers lacking coverage
|
||||
|
||||
nfr_validation:
|
||||
security:
|
||||
status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL
|
||||
notes: "Specific findings"
|
||||
performance:
|
||||
status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL
|
||||
notes: "Specific findings"
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL
|
||||
notes: "Specific findings"
|
||||
maintainability:
|
||||
status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL
|
||||
notes: "Specific findings"
|
||||
|
||||
recommendations:
|
||||
immediate: # Must fix before production
|
||||
- action: "Add rate limiting"
|
||||
refs: ["api/auth/login.ts"]
|
||||
future: # Can be addressed later
|
||||
- action: "Consider caching"
|
||||
refs: ["services/data.ts"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Decision Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Deterministic rule (apply in order):**
|
||||
|
||||
If risk_summary exists, apply its thresholds first (≥9 → FAIL, ≥6 → CONCERNS), then NFR statuses, then top_issues severity.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Risk thresholds (if risk_summary present):**
|
||||
- If any risk score ≥ 9 → Gate = FAIL (unless waived)
|
||||
- Else if any score ≥ 6 → Gate = CONCERNS
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Test coverage gaps (if trace available):**
|
||||
- If any P0 test from test-design is missing → Gate = CONCERNS
|
||||
- If security/data-loss P0 test missing → Gate = FAIL
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Issue severity:**
|
||||
- If any `top_issues.severity == high` → Gate = FAIL (unless waived)
|
||||
- Else if any `severity == medium` → Gate = CONCERNS
|
||||
|
||||
4. **NFR statuses:**
|
||||
- If any NFR status is FAIL → Gate = FAIL
|
||||
- Else if any NFR status is CONCERNS → Gate = CONCERNS
|
||||
- Else → Gate = PASS
|
||||
|
||||
- WAIVED only when waiver.active: true with reason/approver
|
||||
|
||||
Detailed criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- **PASS**: All critical requirements met, no blocking issues
|
||||
- **CONCERNS**: Non-critical issues found, team should review
|
||||
- **FAIL**: Critical issues that should be addressed
|
||||
- **WAIVED**: Issues acknowledged but explicitly waived by team
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Score Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
quality_score = 100 - (20 × number of FAILs) - (10 × number of CONCERNS)
|
||||
Bounded between 0 and 100
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If `technical-preferences.md` defines custom weights, use those instead.
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Owner Convention
|
||||
|
||||
For each issue in `top_issues`, include a `suggested_owner`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `dev`: Code changes needed
|
||||
- `sm`: Requirements clarification needed
|
||||
- `po`: Business decision needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- You are a SENIOR developer reviewing junior/mid-level work
|
||||
- You have the authority and responsibility to improve code directly
|
||||
- You are a Test Architect providing comprehensive quality assessment
|
||||
- You have the authority to improve code directly when appropriate
|
||||
- Always explain your changes for learning purposes
|
||||
- Balance between perfection and pragmatism
|
||||
- Focus on significant improvements, not nitpicks
|
||||
- Focus on risk-based prioritization
|
||||
- Provide actionable recommendations with clear ownership
|
||||
|
||||
## Blocking Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
Stop the review and request clarification if:
|
||||
|
||||
- Story file is incomplete or missing critical sections
|
||||
- File List is empty or clearly incomplete
|
||||
- No tests exist when they were required
|
||||
@@ -140,6 +306,9 @@ Stop the review and request clarification if:
|
||||
## Completion
|
||||
|
||||
After review:
|
||||
1. If all items are checked and approved: Update story status to "Done"
|
||||
2. If unchecked items remain: Keep status as "Review" for dev to address
|
||||
3. Always provide constructive feedback and explanations for learning
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update the QA Results section in the story file
|
||||
2. Create the gate file in `docs/qa/gates/`
|
||||
3. Recommend status: "Ready for Done" or "Changes Required" (owner decides)
|
||||
4. If files were modified, list them in QA Results and ask Dev to update File List
|
||||
5. Always provide constructive feedback and actionable recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
353
bmad-core/tasks/risk-profile.md
Normal file
353
bmad-core/tasks/risk-profile.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
|
||||
# risk-profile
|
||||
|
||||
Generate a comprehensive risk assessment matrix for a story implementation using probability × impact analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- story_id: "{epic}.{story}" # e.g., "1.3"
|
||||
- story_path: "docs/stories/{epic}.{story}.*.md"
|
||||
- story_title: "{title}" # If missing, derive from story file H1
|
||||
- story_slug: "{slug}" # If missing, derive from title (lowercase, hyphenated)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Identify, assess, and prioritize risks in the story implementation. Provide risk mitigation strategies and testing focus areas based on risk levels.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Categories
|
||||
|
||||
**Category Prefixes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `TECH`: Technical Risks
|
||||
- `SEC`: Security Risks
|
||||
- `PERF`: Performance Risks
|
||||
- `DATA`: Data Risks
|
||||
- `BUS`: Business Risks
|
||||
- `OPS`: Operational Risks
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Technical Risks (TECH)**
|
||||
- Architecture complexity
|
||||
- Integration challenges
|
||||
- Technical debt
|
||||
- Scalability concerns
|
||||
- System dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Security Risks (SEC)**
|
||||
- Authentication/authorization flaws
|
||||
- Data exposure vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Injection attacks
|
||||
- Session management issues
|
||||
- Cryptographic weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance Risks (PERF)**
|
||||
- Response time degradation
|
||||
- Throughput bottlenecks
|
||||
- Resource exhaustion
|
||||
- Database query optimization
|
||||
- Caching failures
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Data Risks (DATA)**
|
||||
- Data loss potential
|
||||
- Data corruption
|
||||
- Privacy violations
|
||||
- Compliance issues
|
||||
- Backup/recovery gaps
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Business Risks (BUS)**
|
||||
- Feature doesn't meet user needs
|
||||
- Revenue impact
|
||||
- Reputation damage
|
||||
- Regulatory non-compliance
|
||||
- Market timing
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Operational Risks (OPS)**
|
||||
- Deployment failures
|
||||
- Monitoring gaps
|
||||
- Incident response readiness
|
||||
- Documentation inadequacy
|
||||
- Knowledge transfer issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Analysis Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Risk Identification
|
||||
|
||||
For each category, identify specific risks:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
risk:
|
||||
id: "SEC-001" # Use prefixes: SEC, PERF, DATA, BUS, OPS, TECH
|
||||
category: security
|
||||
title: "Insufficient input validation on user forms"
|
||||
description: "Form inputs not properly sanitized could lead to XSS attacks"
|
||||
affected_components:
|
||||
- "UserRegistrationForm"
|
||||
- "ProfileUpdateForm"
|
||||
detection_method: "Code review revealed missing validation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluate each risk using probability × impact:
|
||||
|
||||
**Probability Levels:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `High (3)`: Likely to occur (>70% chance)
|
||||
- `Medium (2)`: Possible occurrence (30-70% chance)
|
||||
- `Low (1)`: Unlikely to occur (<30% chance)
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact Levels:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `High (3)`: Severe consequences (data breach, system down, major financial loss)
|
||||
- `Medium (2)`: Moderate consequences (degraded performance, minor data issues)
|
||||
- `Low (1)`: Minor consequences (cosmetic issues, slight inconvenience)
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Score = Probability × Impact**
|
||||
|
||||
- 9: Critical Risk (Red)
|
||||
- 6: High Risk (Orange)
|
||||
- 4: Medium Risk (Yellow)
|
||||
- 2-3: Low Risk (Green)
|
||||
- 1: Minimal Risk (Blue)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Risk Prioritization
|
||||
|
||||
Create risk matrix:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Risk Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk ID | Description | Probability | Impact | Score | Priority |
|
||||
| -------- | ----------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ----- | -------- |
|
||||
| SEC-001 | XSS vulnerability | High (3) | High (3) | 9 | Critical |
|
||||
| PERF-001 | Slow query on dashboard | Medium (2) | Medium (2) | 4 | Medium |
|
||||
| DATA-001 | Backup failure | Low (1) | High (3) | 3 | Low |
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Risk Mitigation Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
For each identified risk, provide mitigation:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
mitigation:
|
||||
risk_id: "SEC-001"
|
||||
strategy: "preventive" # preventive|detective|corrective
|
||||
actions:
|
||||
- "Implement input validation library (e.g., validator.js)"
|
||||
- "Add CSP headers to prevent XSS execution"
|
||||
- "Sanitize all user inputs before storage"
|
||||
- "Escape all outputs in templates"
|
||||
testing_requirements:
|
||||
- "Security testing with OWASP ZAP"
|
||||
- "Manual penetration testing of forms"
|
||||
- "Unit tests for validation functions"
|
||||
residual_risk: "Low - Some zero-day vulnerabilities may remain"
|
||||
owner: "dev"
|
||||
timeline: "Before deployment"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 1: Gate YAML Block
|
||||
|
||||
Generate for pasting into gate file under `risk_summary`:
|
||||
|
||||
**Output rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Only include assessed risks; do not emit placeholders
|
||||
- Sort risks by score (desc) when emitting highest and any tabular lists
|
||||
- If no risks: totals all zeros, omit highest, keep recommendations arrays empty
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# risk_summary (paste into gate file):
|
||||
risk_summary:
|
||||
totals:
|
||||
critical: X # score 9
|
||||
high: Y # score 6
|
||||
medium: Z # score 4
|
||||
low: W # score 2-3
|
||||
highest:
|
||||
id: SEC-001
|
||||
score: 9
|
||||
title: "XSS on profile form"
|
||||
recommendations:
|
||||
must_fix:
|
||||
- "Add input sanitization & CSP"
|
||||
monitor:
|
||||
- "Add security alerts for auth endpoints"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 2: Markdown Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Save to:** `docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-risk-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Risk Profile: Story {epic}.{story}
|
||||
|
||||
Date: {date}
|
||||
Reviewer: Quinn (Test Architect)
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Total Risks Identified: X
|
||||
- Critical Risks: Y
|
||||
- High Risks: Z
|
||||
- Risk Score: XX/100 (calculated)
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Risks Requiring Immediate Attention
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. [ID]: Risk Title
|
||||
|
||||
**Score: 9 (Critical)**
|
||||
**Probability**: High - Detailed reasoning
|
||||
**Impact**: High - Potential consequences
|
||||
**Mitigation**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Immediate action required
|
||||
- Specific steps to take
|
||||
**Testing Focus**: Specific test scenarios needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
### By Category
|
||||
|
||||
- Security: X risks (Y critical)
|
||||
- Performance: X risks (Y critical)
|
||||
- Data: X risks (Y critical)
|
||||
- Business: X risks (Y critical)
|
||||
- Operational: X risks (Y critical)
|
||||
|
||||
### By Component
|
||||
|
||||
- Frontend: X risks
|
||||
- Backend: X risks
|
||||
- Database: X risks
|
||||
- Infrastructure: X risks
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Risk Register
|
||||
|
||||
[Full table of all risks with scores and mitigations]
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk-Based Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority 1: Critical Risk Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- Test scenarios for critical risks
|
||||
- Required test types (security, load, chaos)
|
||||
- Test data requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority 2: High Risk Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- Integration test scenarios
|
||||
- Edge case coverage
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority 3: Medium/Low Risk Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- Standard functional tests
|
||||
- Regression test suite
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Must Fix Before Production
|
||||
|
||||
- All critical risks (score 9)
|
||||
- High risks affecting security/data
|
||||
|
||||
### Can Deploy with Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
- Medium risks with compensating controls
|
||||
- Low risks with monitoring in place
|
||||
|
||||
### Accepted Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- Document any risks team accepts
|
||||
- Include sign-off from appropriate authority
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Post-deployment monitoring for:
|
||||
|
||||
- Performance metrics for PERF risks
|
||||
- Security alerts for SEC risks
|
||||
- Error rates for operational risks
|
||||
- Business KPIs for business risks
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Review Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
Review and update risk profile when:
|
||||
|
||||
- Architecture changes significantly
|
||||
- New integrations added
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities discovered
|
||||
- Performance issues reported
|
||||
- Regulatory requirements change
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Scoring Algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
Calculate overall story risk score:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Base Score = 100
|
||||
For each risk:
|
||||
- Critical (9): Deduct 20 points
|
||||
- High (6): Deduct 10 points
|
||||
- Medium (4): Deduct 5 points
|
||||
- Low (2-3): Deduct 2 points
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum score = 0 (extremely risky)
|
||||
Maximum score = 100 (minimal risk)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk-Based Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Based on risk profile, recommend:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Testing Priority**
|
||||
- Which tests to run first
|
||||
- Additional test types needed
|
||||
- Test environment requirements
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Development Focus**
|
||||
- Code review emphasis areas
|
||||
- Additional validation needed
|
||||
- Security controls to implement
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Deployment Strategy**
|
||||
- Phased rollout for high-risk changes
|
||||
- Feature flags for risky features
|
||||
- Rollback procedures
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Monitoring Setup**
|
||||
- Metrics to track
|
||||
- Alerts to configure
|
||||
- Dashboard requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Quality Gates
|
||||
|
||||
**Deterministic gate mapping:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Any risk with score ≥ 9 → Gate = FAIL (unless waived)
|
||||
- Else if any score ≥ 6 → Gate = CONCERNS
|
||||
- Else → Gate = PASS
|
||||
- Unmitigated risks → Document in gate
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 3: Story Hook Line
|
||||
|
||||
**Print this line for review task to quote:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Risk profile: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-risk-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- Identify risks early and systematically
|
||||
- Use consistent probability × impact scoring
|
||||
- Provide actionable mitigation strategies
|
||||
- Link risks to specific test requirements
|
||||
- Track residual risk after mitigation
|
||||
- Update risk profile as story evolves
|
||||
@@ -8,20 +8,20 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Primary Method: Automatic with markdown-tree
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
|
||||
[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in {root}/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
|
||||
|
||||
If the command succeeds, inform the user that the document has been sharded successfully and STOP - do not proceed further.
|
||||
|
||||
If the command fails (especially with an error indicating the command is not found or not available), inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is enabled but the md-tree command is not available. Please either:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
|
||||
2. Or set markdownExploder to false in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
2. Or set markdownExploder to false in {root}/core-config.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: STOP HERE - do not proceed with manual sharding until one of the above actions is taken.**"
|
||||
|
||||
If markdownExploder is set to false, inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is currently false. For better performance and reliability, you should:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set markdownExploder to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
1. Set markdownExploder to true in {root}/core-config.yaml
|
||||
2. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
|
||||
|
||||
I will now proceed with the manual sharding process."
|
||||
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
|
||||
|
||||
## Manual Method (if @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser is not available or user indicated manual method)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only proceed with the manual instructions below if the user cannot or does not want to use @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify Document and Target Location
|
||||
@@ -73,7 +71,7 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
|
||||
|
||||
2. Parse and Extract Sections
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: When sharding the document:
|
||||
CRITICAL AEGNT SHARDING RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read the entire document content
|
||||
2. Identify all level 2 sections (## headings)
|
||||
@@ -93,13 +91,11 @@ CRITICAL: Use proper parsing that understands markdown context. A ## inside a co
|
||||
For each extracted section:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Generate filename**: Convert the section heading to lowercase-dash-case
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove special characters
|
||||
- Replace spaces with dashes
|
||||
- Example: "## Tech Stack" → `tech-stack.md`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Adjust heading levels**:
|
||||
|
||||
- The level 2 heading becomes level 1 (# instead of ##) in the sharded new document
|
||||
- All subsection levels decrease by 1:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -134,8 +130,6 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Preserve Special Content
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Pay special attention to preserving:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code blocks**: Must capture complete blocks including:
|
||||
|
||||
```language
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +151,7 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Links and references**: Keep all markdown links intact
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} or [[LLM instructions]], preserve exactly]]
|
||||
7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} ,preserve exactly
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Validation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
174
bmad-core/tasks/test-design.md
Normal file
174
bmad-core/tasks/test-design.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
|
||||
# test-design
|
||||
|
||||
Create comprehensive test scenarios with appropriate test level recommendations for story implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- story_id: "{epic}.{story}" # e.g., "1.3"
|
||||
- story_path: "{devStoryLocation}/{epic}.{story}.*.md" # Path from core-config.yaml
|
||||
- story_title: "{title}" # If missing, derive from story file H1
|
||||
- story_slug: "{slug}" # If missing, derive from title (lowercase, hyphenated)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Design a complete test strategy that identifies what to test, at which level (unit/integration/e2e), and why. This ensures efficient test coverage without redundancy while maintaining appropriate test boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- test-levels-framework.md # Unit/Integration/E2E decision criteria
|
||||
- test-priorities-matrix.md # P0/P1/P2/P3 classification system
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Analyze Story Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Break down each acceptance criterion into testable scenarios. For each AC:
|
||||
|
||||
- Identify the core functionality to test
|
||||
- Determine data variations needed
|
||||
- Consider error conditions
|
||||
- Note edge cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Apply Test Level Framework
|
||||
|
||||
**Reference:** Load `test-levels-framework.md` for detailed criteria
|
||||
|
||||
Quick rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Unit**: Pure logic, algorithms, calculations
|
||||
- **Integration**: Component interactions, DB operations
|
||||
- **E2E**: Critical user journeys, compliance
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Assign Priorities
|
||||
|
||||
**Reference:** Load `test-priorities-matrix.md` for classification
|
||||
|
||||
Quick priority assignment:
|
||||
|
||||
- **P0**: Revenue-critical, security, compliance
|
||||
- **P1**: Core user journeys, frequently used
|
||||
- **P2**: Secondary features, admin functions
|
||||
- **P3**: Nice-to-have, rarely used
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Design Test Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
For each identified test need, create:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
test_scenario:
|
||||
id: "{epic}.{story}-{LEVEL}-{SEQ}"
|
||||
requirement: "AC reference"
|
||||
priority: P0|P1|P2|P3
|
||||
level: unit|integration|e2e
|
||||
description: "What is being tested"
|
||||
justification: "Why this level was chosen"
|
||||
mitigates_risks: ["RISK-001"] # If risk profile exists
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Validate Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure:
|
||||
|
||||
- Every AC has at least one test
|
||||
- No duplicate coverage across levels
|
||||
- Critical paths have multiple levels
|
||||
- Risk mitigations are addressed
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 1: Test Design Document
|
||||
|
||||
**Save to:** `docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-test-design-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Test Design: Story {epic}.{story}
|
||||
|
||||
Date: {date}
|
||||
Designer: Quinn (Test Architect)
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Strategy Overview
|
||||
|
||||
- Total test scenarios: X
|
||||
- Unit tests: Y (A%)
|
||||
- Integration tests: Z (B%)
|
||||
- E2E tests: W (C%)
|
||||
- Priority distribution: P0: X, P1: Y, P2: Z
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Scenarios by Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### AC1: {description}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Level | Priority | Test | Justification |
|
||||
| ------------ | ----------- | -------- | ------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|
||||
| 1.3-UNIT-001 | Unit | P0 | Validate input format | Pure validation logic |
|
||||
| 1.3-INT-001 | Integration | P0 | Service processes request | Multi-component flow |
|
||||
| 1.3-E2E-001 | E2E | P1 | User completes journey | Critical path validation |
|
||||
|
||||
[Continue for all ACs...]
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
[Map test scenarios to identified risks if risk profile exists]
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Execution Order
|
||||
|
||||
1. P0 Unit tests (fail fast)
|
||||
2. P0 Integration tests
|
||||
3. P0 E2E tests
|
||||
4. P1 tests in order
|
||||
5. P2+ as time permits
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 2: Gate YAML Block
|
||||
|
||||
Generate for inclusion in quality gate:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
test_design:
|
||||
scenarios_total: X
|
||||
by_level:
|
||||
unit: Y
|
||||
integration: Z
|
||||
e2e: W
|
||||
by_priority:
|
||||
p0: A
|
||||
p1: B
|
||||
p2: C
|
||||
coverage_gaps: [] # List any ACs without tests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 3: Trace References
|
||||
|
||||
Print for use by trace-requirements task:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Test design matrix: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-test-design-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
P0 tests identified: {count}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before finalizing, verify:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Every AC has test coverage
|
||||
- [ ] Test levels are appropriate (not over-testing)
|
||||
- [ ] No duplicate coverage across levels
|
||||
- [ ] Priorities align with business risk
|
||||
- [ ] Test IDs follow naming convention
|
||||
- [ ] Scenarios are atomic and independent
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Shift left**: Prefer unit over integration, integration over E2E
|
||||
- **Risk-based**: Focus on what could go wrong
|
||||
- **Efficient coverage**: Test once at the right level
|
||||
- **Maintainability**: Consider long-term test maintenance
|
||||
- **Fast feedback**: Quick tests run first
|
||||
264
bmad-core/tasks/trace-requirements.md
Normal file
264
bmad-core/tasks/trace-requirements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
|
||||
# trace-requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Map story requirements to test cases using Given-When-Then patterns for comprehensive traceability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Create a requirements traceability matrix that ensures every acceptance criterion has corresponding test coverage. This task helps identify gaps in testing and ensures all requirements are validated.
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT**: Given-When-Then is used here for documenting the mapping between requirements and tests, NOT for writing the actual test code. Tests should follow your project's testing standards (no BDD syntax in test code).
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- Story file with clear acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Access to test files or test specifications
|
||||
- Understanding of the implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Traceability Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Extract Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Identify all testable requirements from:
|
||||
|
||||
- Acceptance Criteria (primary source)
|
||||
- User story statement
|
||||
- Tasks/subtasks with specific behaviors
|
||||
- Non-functional requirements mentioned
|
||||
- Edge cases documented
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Map to Test Cases
|
||||
|
||||
For each requirement, document which tests validate it. Use Given-When-Then to describe what the test validates (not how it's written):
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
requirement: "AC1: User can login with valid credentials"
|
||||
test_mappings:
|
||||
- test_file: "auth/login.test.ts"
|
||||
test_case: "should successfully login with valid email and password"
|
||||
# Given-When-Then describes WHAT the test validates, not HOW it's coded
|
||||
given: "A registered user with valid credentials"
|
||||
when: "They submit the login form"
|
||||
then: "They are redirected to dashboard and session is created"
|
||||
coverage: full
|
||||
|
||||
- test_file: "e2e/auth-flow.test.ts"
|
||||
test_case: "complete login flow"
|
||||
given: "User on login page"
|
||||
when: "Entering valid credentials and submitting"
|
||||
then: "Dashboard loads with user data"
|
||||
coverage: integration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Coverage Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluate coverage for each requirement:
|
||||
|
||||
**Coverage Levels:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `full`: Requirement completely tested
|
||||
- `partial`: Some aspects tested, gaps exist
|
||||
- `none`: No test coverage found
|
||||
- `integration`: Covered in integration/e2e tests only
|
||||
- `unit`: Covered in unit tests only
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Gap Identification
|
||||
|
||||
Document any gaps found:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
coverage_gaps:
|
||||
- requirement: "AC3: Password reset email sent within 60 seconds"
|
||||
gap: "No test for email delivery timing"
|
||||
severity: medium
|
||||
suggested_test:
|
||||
type: integration
|
||||
description: "Test email service SLA compliance"
|
||||
|
||||
- requirement: "AC5: Support 1000 concurrent users"
|
||||
gap: "No load testing implemented"
|
||||
severity: high
|
||||
suggested_test:
|
||||
type: performance
|
||||
description: "Load test with 1000 concurrent connections"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 1: Gate YAML Block
|
||||
|
||||
**Generate for pasting into gate file under `trace`:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
trace:
|
||||
totals:
|
||||
requirements: X
|
||||
full: Y
|
||||
partial: Z
|
||||
none: W
|
||||
planning_ref: "docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-test-design-{YYYYMMDD}.md"
|
||||
uncovered:
|
||||
- ac: "AC3"
|
||||
reason: "No test found for password reset timing"
|
||||
notes: "See docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-trace-{YYYYMMDD}.md"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 2: Traceability Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Save to:** `docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-trace-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Create a traceability report with:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Requirements Traceability Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
## Story: {epic}.{story} - {title}
|
||||
|
||||
### Coverage Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Total Requirements: X
|
||||
- Fully Covered: Y (Z%)
|
||||
- Partially Covered: A (B%)
|
||||
- Not Covered: C (D%)
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement Mappings
|
||||
|
||||
#### AC1: {Acceptance Criterion 1}
|
||||
|
||||
**Coverage: FULL**
|
||||
|
||||
Given-When-Then Mappings:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Unit Test**: `auth.service.test.ts::validateCredentials`
|
||||
- Given: Valid user credentials
|
||||
- When: Validation method called
|
||||
- Then: Returns true with user object
|
||||
|
||||
- **Integration Test**: `auth.integration.test.ts::loginFlow`
|
||||
- Given: User with valid account
|
||||
- When: Login API called
|
||||
- Then: JWT token returned and session created
|
||||
|
||||
#### AC2: {Acceptance Criterion 2}
|
||||
|
||||
**Coverage: PARTIAL**
|
||||
|
||||
[Continue for all ACs...]
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Gaps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Performance Requirements**
|
||||
- Gap: No load testing for concurrent users
|
||||
- Risk: High - Could fail under production load
|
||||
- Action: Implement load tests using k6 or similar
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Security Requirements**
|
||||
- Gap: Rate limiting not tested
|
||||
- Risk: Medium - Potential DoS vulnerability
|
||||
- Action: Add rate limit tests to integration suite
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Design Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Based on gaps identified, recommend:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Additional test scenarios needed
|
||||
2. Test types to implement (unit/integration/e2e/performance)
|
||||
3. Test data requirements
|
||||
4. Mock/stub strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
- **High Risk**: Requirements with no coverage
|
||||
- **Medium Risk**: Requirements with only partial coverage
|
||||
- **Low Risk**: Requirements with full unit + integration coverage
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Traceability Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Given-When-Then for Mapping (Not Test Code)
|
||||
|
||||
Use Given-When-Then to document what each test validates:
|
||||
|
||||
**Given**: The initial context the test sets up
|
||||
|
||||
- What state/data the test prepares
|
||||
- User context being simulated
|
||||
- System preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: The action the test performs
|
||||
|
||||
- What the test executes
|
||||
- API calls or user actions tested
|
||||
- Events triggered
|
||||
|
||||
**Then**: What the test asserts
|
||||
|
||||
- Expected outcomes verified
|
||||
- State changes checked
|
||||
- Values validated
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: This is for documentation only. Actual test code follows your project's standards (e.g., describe/it blocks, no BDD syntax).
|
||||
|
||||
### Coverage Priority
|
||||
|
||||
Prioritize coverage based on:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Critical business flows
|
||||
2. Security-related requirements
|
||||
3. Data integrity requirements
|
||||
4. User-facing features
|
||||
5. Performance SLAs
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Granularity
|
||||
|
||||
Map at appropriate levels:
|
||||
|
||||
- Unit tests for business logic
|
||||
- Integration tests for component interaction
|
||||
- E2E tests for user journeys
|
||||
- Performance tests for NFRs
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Indicators
|
||||
|
||||
Good traceability shows:
|
||||
|
||||
- Every AC has at least one test
|
||||
- Critical paths have multiple test levels
|
||||
- Edge cases are explicitly covered
|
||||
- NFRs have appropriate test types
|
||||
- Clear Given-When-Then for each test
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags
|
||||
|
||||
Watch for:
|
||||
|
||||
- ACs with no test coverage
|
||||
- Tests that don't map to requirements
|
||||
- Vague test descriptions
|
||||
- Missing edge case coverage
|
||||
- NFRs without specific tests
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Gates
|
||||
|
||||
This traceability feeds into quality gates:
|
||||
|
||||
- Critical gaps → FAIL
|
||||
- Minor gaps → CONCERNS
|
||||
- Missing P0 tests from test-design → CONCERNS
|
||||
|
||||
### Output 3: Story Hook Line
|
||||
|
||||
**Print this line for review task to quote:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Trace matrix: docs/qa/assessments/{epic}.{story}-trace-{YYYYMMDD}.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Full coverage → PASS contribution
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- Every requirement must be testable
|
||||
- Use Given-When-Then for clarity
|
||||
- Identify both presence and absence
|
||||
- Prioritize based on risk
|
||||
- Make recommendations actionable
|
||||
@@ -1,248 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Update Workflow Plan Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Update the status of steps in an active workflow plan, mark completions, add notes about deviations, and maintain an accurate record of workflow progress. This task can be called directly by users or automatically by other tasks upon completion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Load Plan Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First load core-config.yaml to get plan settings]]
|
||||
|
||||
Check workflow configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
- `workflow.planFile` - Location of the plan (default: docs/workflow-plan.md)
|
||||
- `workflow.trackProgress` - Whether tracking is enabled
|
||||
- `workflow.updateOnCompletion` - Whether to auto-update on task completion
|
||||
|
||||
If tracking is disabled, inform user and exit.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Verify Plan Exists
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check if workflow plan exists at configured location]]
|
||||
|
||||
If no plan exists:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
No active workflow plan found at {location}.
|
||||
Would you like to create one? Use *plan command.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Determine Update Type
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ask user what type of update they want to make]]
|
||||
|
||||
Present options:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
What would you like to update in the workflow plan?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Mark step as complete
|
||||
2. Update current step
|
||||
3. Add deviation note
|
||||
4. Mark decision point resolution
|
||||
5. Update overall status
|
||||
6. View current plan status only
|
||||
|
||||
Please select an option (1-6):
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Parse Current Plan
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Read and parse the plan to understand current state]]
|
||||
|
||||
Extract:
|
||||
|
||||
- All steps with their checkbox status
|
||||
- Step IDs from comments (if present)
|
||||
- Current completion percentage
|
||||
- Any existing deviation notes
|
||||
- Decision points and their status
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Execute Updates
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.1 Mark Step Complete
|
||||
|
||||
If user selected option 1:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Show numbered list of incomplete steps
|
||||
2. Ask which step to mark complete
|
||||
3. Update the checkbox from `[ ]` to `[x]`
|
||||
4. Add completion timestamp: `<!-- completed: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM -->`
|
||||
5. If this was the current step, identify next step
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.2 Update Current Step
|
||||
|
||||
If user selected option 2:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Show all steps with current status
|
||||
2. Ask which step is now current
|
||||
3. Add/move `<!-- current-step -->` marker
|
||||
4. Optionally add note about why sequence changed
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.3 Add Deviation Note
|
||||
|
||||
If user selected option 3:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ask for deviation description
|
||||
2. Ask which step this relates to (or general)
|
||||
3. Insert note in appropriate location:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
> **Deviation Note** (YYYY-MM-DD): {user_note}
|
||||
> Related to: Step X.Y or General workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.4 Mark Decision Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
If user selected option 4:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Show pending decision points
|
||||
2. Ask which decision was made
|
||||
3. Record the decision and chosen path
|
||||
4. Update related steps based on decision
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.5 Update Overall Status
|
||||
|
||||
If user selected option 5:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Show current overall status
|
||||
2. Provide options:
|
||||
- Active (continuing with plan)
|
||||
- Paused (temporarily stopped)
|
||||
- Abandoned (no longer following)
|
||||
- Complete (all steps done)
|
||||
3. Update plan header with new status
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Automatic Updates (When Called by Tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: When called automatically by another task]]
|
||||
|
||||
If called with parameters:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
task: {task_name}
|
||||
step_id: {step_identifier}
|
||||
status: complete|skipped|failed
|
||||
note: {optional_note}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Find the corresponding step
|
||||
2. Update its status
|
||||
3. Add completion metadata
|
||||
4. Add note if provided
|
||||
5. Calculate new progress percentage
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Update Summary
|
||||
|
||||
After updates, show summary:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
✅ Workflow Plan Updated
|
||||
|
||||
Changes made:
|
||||
- {change_1}
|
||||
- {change_2}
|
||||
|
||||
New Status:
|
||||
- Progress: {X}% complete ({completed}/{total} steps)
|
||||
- Current Step: {current_step}
|
||||
- Next Recommended: {next_step}
|
||||
|
||||
Plan location: {file_path}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Integration with Other Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: How other tasks should call this]]
|
||||
|
||||
Other tasks can integrate by:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **After Task Completion**:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
At end of task execution:
|
||||
- Check if task corresponds to a plan step
|
||||
- If yes, call update-workflow-plan with:
|
||||
- task: {current_task_name}
|
||||
- step_id: {matching_step}
|
||||
- status: complete
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **On Task Failure**:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
If task fails:
|
||||
- Call update-workflow-plan with:
|
||||
- task: {current_task_name}
|
||||
- status: failed
|
||||
- note: {failure_reason}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Plan Status Display
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: When user selects view status only]]
|
||||
|
||||
Display comprehensive status:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
📋 Workflow Plan Status
|
||||
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
||||
Workflow: {workflow_name}
|
||||
Status: {Active|Paused|Complete}
|
||||
Progress: {X}% complete ({completed}/{total} steps)
|
||||
Last Updated: {timestamp}
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Completed Steps:
|
||||
- [x] Step 1.1: {description} (completed: {date})
|
||||
- [x] Step 1.2: {description} (completed: {date})
|
||||
|
||||
🔄 Current Step:
|
||||
- [ ] Step 2.1: {description} <!-- current-step -->
|
||||
Agent: {agent_name}
|
||||
Task: {task_name}
|
||||
|
||||
📌 Upcoming Steps:
|
||||
- [ ] Step 2.2: {description}
|
||||
- [ ] Step 3.1: {description}
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Deviations/Notes:
|
||||
{any_deviation_notes}
|
||||
|
||||
📊 Decision Points:
|
||||
- Decision 1: {status} - {choice_made}
|
||||
- Decision 2: Pending
|
||||
|
||||
💡 Next Action:
|
||||
Based on the plan, you should {recommended_action}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
The update is successful when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Plan accurately reflects current workflow state
|
||||
2. All updates are clearly timestamped
|
||||
3. Deviations are documented with reasons
|
||||
4. Progress calculation is correct
|
||||
5. Next steps are clear to user
|
||||
6. Plan remains readable and well-formatted
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
- **Plan file not found**: Offer to create new plan
|
||||
- **Malformed plan**: Attempt basic updates, warn user
|
||||
- **Write permission error**: Show changes that would be made
|
||||
- **Step not found**: Show available steps, ask for clarification
|
||||
- **Concurrent updates**: Implement simple locking or warn about conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Always preserve plan history (don't delete old information)
|
||||
- Keep updates atomic to prevent corruption
|
||||
- Consider creating backup before major updates
|
||||
- Updates should enhance, not complicate, the workflow experience
|
||||
- If plan becomes too cluttered, suggest creating fresh plan for next phase
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ To comprehensively validate a story draft before implementation begins, ensuring
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Load Core Configuration and Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml` from the project root
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml`
|
||||
- If the file does not exist, HALT and inform the user: "core-config.yaml not found. This file is required for story validation."
|
||||
- Extract key configurations: `devStoryLocation`, `prd.*`, `architecture.*`
|
||||
- Identify and load the following inputs:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,776 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. If at a minimum you cannot local `docs/prd.md` ask the user what docs will provide the basis for the architecture.]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section establishes the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the overall project architecture for {{Project Name}}, including backend systems, shared services, and non-UI specific concerns. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency and adherence to chosen patterns and technologies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Frontend Architecture:**
|
||||
If the project includes a significant user interface, a separate Frontend Architecture Document will detail the frontend-specific design and MUST be used in conjunction with this document. Core technology stack choices documented herein (see "Tech Stack") are definitive for the entire project, including any frontend components.
|
||||
|
||||
### Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before proceeding further with architecture design, check if the project is based on a starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and brainstorming brief for any mentions of:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- Existing projects or codebases being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Boilerplate projects or scaffolding tools
|
||||
- Previous projects to be cloned or adapted
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.)
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-configured technology stack and versions
|
||||
- Project structure and organization patterns
|
||||
- Built-in scripts and tooling
|
||||
- Existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Any limitations or constraints imposed by the starter
|
||||
- Use this analysis to inform and align your architecture decisions
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter template is mentioned but this is a greenfield project:
|
||||
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate starter templates based on the tech stack preferences
|
||||
- Explain the benefits (faster setup, best practices, community support)
|
||||
- Let the user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
|
||||
- Proceed with architecture design from scratch
|
||||
- Note that manual setup will be required for all tooling and configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Document the decision here before proceeding with the architecture design. In none, just say N/A
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this starter template section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## High Level Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation of the architecture. Present all subsections together (Introduction, Technical Summary, High Level Overview, Project Diagram, and Architectural Patterns), then apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol to the complete High Level Architecture section. The user can choose to refine the entire section or specific subsections.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a brief paragraph (3-5 sentences) overview of:
|
||||
|
||||
- The system's overall architecture style
|
||||
- Key components and their relationships
|
||||
- Primary technology choices
|
||||
- Core architectural patterns being used
|
||||
- Reference back to the PRD goals and how this architecture supports them]]
|
||||
|
||||
### High Level Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the PRD's Technical Assumptions section, describe:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The main architectural style (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless, Event-Driven)
|
||||
2. Repository structure decision from PRD (Monorepo/Polyrepo)
|
||||
3. Service architecture decision from PRD
|
||||
4. Primary user interaction flow or data flow at a conceptual level
|
||||
5. Key architectural decisions and their rationale
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### High Level Project Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a Mermaid diagram that visualizes the high-level architecture. Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- System boundaries
|
||||
- Major components/services
|
||||
- Data flow directions
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- User entry points
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate Mermaid diagram type (graph TD, C4, sequence) based on what best represents the architecture
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the diagram, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Architectural and Design Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List the key high-level patterns that will guide the architecture. For each pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present 2-3 viable options if multiple exist
|
||||
2. Provide your recommendation with clear rationale
|
||||
3. Get user confirmation before finalizing
|
||||
4. These patterns should align with the PRD's technical assumptions and project goals
|
||||
|
||||
Common patterns to consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- Architectural style patterns (Serverless, Event-Driven, Microservices, CQRS, Hexagonal)
|
||||
- Code organization patterns (Dependency Injection, Repository, Module, Factory)
|
||||
- Data patterns (Event Sourcing, Saga, Database per Service)
|
||||
- Communication patterns (REST, GraphQL, Message Queue, Pub/Sub)]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: pattern>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: patterns}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Serverless Architecture:** Using AWS Lambda for compute - _Rationale:_ Aligns with PRD requirement for cost optimization and automatic scaling
|
||||
- **Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility
|
||||
- **Event-Driven Communication:** Using SNS/SQS for service decoupling - _Rationale:_ Supports async processing and system resilience
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the patterns, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Tech Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection section. Work with the user to make specific choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD technical assumptions and any preferences from `{root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml` or an attached `technical-preferences`
|
||||
2. For each category, present 2-3 viable options with pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a clear recommendation based on project needs
|
||||
4. Get explicit user approval for each selection
|
||||
5. Document exact versions (avoid "latest" - pin specific versions)
|
||||
6. This table is the single source of truth - all other docs must reference these choices
|
||||
|
||||
Key decisions to finalize - before displaying the table, ensure you are aware of or ask the user about - let the user know if they are not sure on any that you can also provide suggestions with rationale:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (if any)
|
||||
- Languages and runtimes with exact versions
|
||||
- Frameworks and libraries / packages
|
||||
- Cloud provider and key services choices
|
||||
- Database and storage solutions - if unclear suggest sql or nosql or other types depending on the project and depending on cloud provider offer a suggestion
|
||||
- Development tools
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render of the table, ensure the user is aware of the importance of this sections choices, should also look for gaps or disagreements with anything, ask for any clarifications if something is unclear why its in the list, and also right away apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` display - this statement and the options should be rendered and then prompt right all before allowing user input.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Cloud Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
- **Provider:** {{cloud_provider}}
|
||||
- **Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Stack Table
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale |
|
||||
| :----------------- | :----------------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------- |
|
||||
| **Language** | {{language}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | {{runtime}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Database** | {{database}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Cache** | {{cache}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Message Queue** | {{queue}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **API Style** | {{api_style}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Authentication** | {{auth}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **IaC Tool** | {{iac_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Monitoring** | {{monitoring}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Logging** | {{logging}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: tech_stack_row}
|
||||
| **Language** | TypeScript | 5.3.3 | Primary development language | Strong typing, excellent tooling, team expertise |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | Node.js | 20.11.0 | JavaScript runtime | LTS version, stable performance, wide ecosystem |
|
||||
| **Framework** | NestJS | 10.3.2 | Backend framework | Enterprise-ready, good DI, matches team patterns |
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Models
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the core data models/entities:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting all data models, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: data_model>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{model_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{relationship_1}}
|
||||
- {{relationship_2}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services and their responsibilities
|
||||
2. Consider the repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo) from PRD
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
6. After presenting all components, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: component>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the diagrams, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## External APIs
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: external_api>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{api_name}} API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
<<REPEAT: endpoint>>
|
||||
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: external_api}
|
||||
|
||||
### Stripe API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** Payment processing and subscription management
|
||||
- **Documentation:** https://stripe.com/docs/api
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** `https://api.stripe.com/v1`
|
||||
- **Authentication:** Bearer token with secret key
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** 100 requests per second
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `POST /customers` - Create customer profiles
|
||||
- `POST /payment_intents` - Process payments
|
||||
- `POST /subscriptions` - Manage subscriptions
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting external APIs (or noting their absence), apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include error handling paths
|
||||
4. Document async operations
|
||||
5. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the workflow diagrams, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## REST API Spec
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If the project includes a REST API:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
3. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
4. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
5. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use YAML format for better readability. If no REST API, skip this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_rest_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
version:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
description:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
description:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_rest_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the REST API spec (or noting its absence if not applicable), apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Database Schema
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the database schema, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Source Tree
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a project folder structure that reflects:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The chosen repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo)
|
||||
2. The service architecture (monolith/microservices/serverless)
|
||||
3. The selected tech stack and languages
|
||||
4. Component organization from above
|
||||
5. Best practices for the chosen frameworks
|
||||
6. Clear separation of concerns
|
||||
|
||||
Adapt the structure based on project needs. For monorepos, show service separation. For serverless, show function organization. Include language-specific conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the structure, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol to refine based on user feedback.]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── .github/ # CI/CD workflows
|
||||
│ └── workflows/
|
||||
│ └── main.yaml
|
||||
├── .vscode/ # VSCode settings (optional)
|
||||
│ └── settings.json
|
||||
├── build/ # Compiled output (git-ignored)
|
||||
├── config/ # Configuration files
|
||||
├── docs/ # Project documentation
|
||||
│ ├── PRD.md
|
||||
│ ├── architecture.md
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── infra/ # Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
│ └── {{iac-structure}}
|
||||
├── {{dependencies-dir}}/ # Dependencies (git-ignored)
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Utility scripts
|
||||
├── src/ # Application source code
|
||||
│ └── {{source-structure}}
|
||||
├── tests/ # Test files
|
||||
│ ├── unit/
|
||||
│ ├── integration/
|
||||
│ └── e2e/
|
||||
├── .env.example # Environment variables template
|
||||
├── .gitignore # Git ignore rules
|
||||
├── {{package-manifest}} # Dependencies manifest
|
||||
├── {{config-files}} # Language/framework configs
|
||||
└── README.md # Project documentation
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: monorepo-structure}
|
||||
project-root/
|
||||
├── packages/
|
||||
│ ├── api/ # Backend API service
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared utilities/types
|
||||
│ └── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Monorepo management scripts
|
||||
└── package.json # Root package.json with workspaces
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the source tree structure, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure and Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the deployment architecture and practices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use IaC tool selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Choose deployment strategy appropriate for the architecture
|
||||
3. Define environments and promotion flow
|
||||
4. Establish rollback procedures
|
||||
5. Consider security, monitoring, and cost optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Get user input on deployment preferences and CI/CD tool choices.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
|
||||
- **Tool:** {{iac_tool}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Location:** `{{iac_directory}}`
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{iac_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
- **CI/CD Platform:** {{cicd_platform}}
|
||||
- **Pipeline Configuration:** `{{pipeline_config_location}}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Environments
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: environment>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{env_name}}:** {{env_purpose}} - {{env_details}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Promotion Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
{{promotion_flow_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Rollback Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
- **Trigger Conditions:** {{rollback_triggers}}
|
||||
- **Recovery Time Objective:** {{rto}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the infrastructure and deployment section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define comprehensive error handling approach:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Choose appropriate patterns for the language/framework from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Define logging standards and tools
|
||||
3. Establish error categories and handling rules
|
||||
4. Consider observability and debugging needs
|
||||
5. Ensure security (no sensitive data in logs)
|
||||
|
||||
This section guides both AI and human developers in consistent error handling.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### General Approach
|
||||
|
||||
- **Error Model:** {{error_model}}
|
||||
- **Exception Hierarchy:** {{exception_structure}}
|
||||
- **Error Propagation:** {{propagation_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Logging Standards
|
||||
|
||||
- **Library:** {{logging_library}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Format:** {{log_format}}
|
||||
- **Levels:** {{log_levels_definition}}
|
||||
- **Required Context:**
|
||||
- Correlation ID: {{correlation_id_format}}
|
||||
- Service Context: {{service_context}}
|
||||
- User Context: {{user_context_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
#### External API Errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **Retry Policy:** {{retry_strategy}}
|
||||
- **Circuit Breaker:** {{circuit_breaker_config}}
|
||||
- **Timeout Configuration:** {{timeout_settings}}
|
||||
- **Error Translation:** {{error_mapping_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Business Logic Errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **Custom Exceptions:** {{business_exception_types}}
|
||||
- **User-Facing Errors:** {{user_error_format}}
|
||||
- **Error Codes:** {{error_code_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Data Consistency
|
||||
|
||||
- **Transaction Strategy:** {{transaction_approach}}
|
||||
- **Compensation Logic:** {{compensation_patterns}}
|
||||
- **Idempotency:** {{idempotency_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the error handling strategy, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Coding Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: These standards are MANDATORY for AI agents. Work with user to define ONLY the critical rules needed to prevent bad code. Explain that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This section directly controls AI developer behavior
|
||||
2. Keep it minimal - assume AI knows general best practices
|
||||
3. Focus on project-specific conventions and gotchas
|
||||
4. Overly detailed standards bloat context and slow development
|
||||
5. Standards will be extracted to separate file for dev agent use
|
||||
|
||||
For each standard, get explicit user confirmation it's necessary.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Standards
|
||||
|
||||
- **Languages & Runtimes:** {{languages_and_versions}}
|
||||
- **Style & Linting:** {{linter_config}}
|
||||
- **Test Organization:** {{test_file_convention}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if deviating from language defaults]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Element | Convention | Example |
|
||||
| :-------- | :------------------- | :---------------- |
|
||||
| Variables | {{var_convention}} | {{var_example}} |
|
||||
| Functions | {{func_convention}} | {{func_example}} |
|
||||
| Classes | {{class_convention}} | {{class_example}} |
|
||||
| Files | {{file_convention}} | {{file_example}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Rules
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List ONLY rules that AI might violate or project-specific requirements. Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Never use console.log in production code - use logger"
|
||||
- "All API responses must use ApiResponse wrapper type"
|
||||
- "Database queries must use repository pattern, never direct ORM"
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid obvious rules like "use SOLID principles" or "write clean code"]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: critical_rule>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Language-Specific Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Add ONLY if critical for preventing AI mistakes. Most teams don't need this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_language_specifics^^
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{language_name}} Specifics
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: language_rule>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{rule_topic}}:** {{rule_detail}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_language_specifics^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the coding standards, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Strategy and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with user to define comprehensive test strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use test frameworks from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Decide on TDD vs test-after approach
|
||||
3. Define test organization and naming
|
||||
4. Establish coverage goals
|
||||
5. Determine integration test infrastructure
|
||||
6. Plan for test data and external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Basic info goes in Coding Standards for dev agent. This detailed section is for QA agent and team reference. Apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` after initial draft.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Goals:** {{coverage_targets}}
|
||||
- **Test Pyramid:** {{test_distribution}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Types and Organization
|
||||
|
||||
#### Unit Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{unit_test_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **File Convention:** {{unit_test_naming}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{unit_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Mocking Library:** {{mocking_library}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Requirement:** {{unit_coverage}}
|
||||
|
||||
**AI Agent Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Generate tests for all public methods
|
||||
- Cover edge cases and error conditions
|
||||
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
|
||||
- Mock all external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_scope}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{integration_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Test Infrastructure:**
|
||||
<<REPEAT: test_dependency>>
|
||||
- **{{dependency_name}}:** {{test_approach}} ({{test_tool}})
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: test_dependencies}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Database:** In-memory H2 for unit tests, Testcontainers PostgreSQL for integration
|
||||
- **Message Queue:** Embedded Kafka for tests
|
||||
- **External APIs:** WireMock for stubbing
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
#### End-to-End Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{e2e_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{e2e_scope}}
|
||||
- **Environment:** {{e2e_environment}}
|
||||
- **Test Data:** {{e2e_data_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Data Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{test_data_approach}}
|
||||
- **Fixtures:** {{fixture_location}}
|
||||
- **Factories:** {{factory_pattern}}
|
||||
- **Cleanup:** {{cleanup_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Continuous Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **CI Integration:** {{ci_test_stages}}
|
||||
- **Performance Tests:** {{perf_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Security Tests:** {{security_test_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the test strategy section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Security
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define MANDATORY security requirements for AI and human developers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Focus on implementation-specific rules
|
||||
2. Reference security tools from Tech Stack
|
||||
3. Define clear patterns for common scenarios
|
||||
4. These rules directly impact code generation
|
||||
5. Work with user to ensure completeness without redundancy]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- **Validation Library:** {{validation_library}}
|
||||
- **Validation Location:** {{where_to_validate}}
|
||||
- **Required Rules:**
|
||||
- All external inputs MUST be validated
|
||||
- Validation at API boundary before processing
|
||||
- Whitelist approach preferred over blacklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
- **Auth Method:** {{auth_implementation}}
|
||||
- **Session Management:** {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- **Required Patterns:**
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_1}}
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Secrets Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **Development:** {{dev_secrets_approach}}
|
||||
- **Production:** {{prod_secrets_service}}
|
||||
- **Code Requirements:**
|
||||
- NEVER hardcode secrets
|
||||
- Access via configuration service only
|
||||
- No secrets in logs or error messages
|
||||
|
||||
### API Security
|
||||
|
||||
- **Rate Limiting:** {{rate_limit_implementation}}
|
||||
- **CORS Policy:** {{cors_configuration}}
|
||||
- **Security Headers:** {{required_headers}}
|
||||
- **HTTPS Enforcement:** {{https_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Protection
|
||||
|
||||
- **Encryption at Rest:** {{encryption_at_rest}}
|
||||
- **Encryption in Transit:** {{encryption_in_transit}}
|
||||
- **PII Handling:** {{pii_rules}}
|
||||
- **Logging Restrictions:** {{what_not_to_log}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependency Security
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scanning Tool:** {{dependency_scanner}}
|
||||
- **Update Policy:** {{update_frequency}}
|
||||
- **Approval Process:** {{new_dep_process}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **SAST Tool:** {{static_analysis}}
|
||||
- **DAST Tool:** {{dynamic_analysis}}
|
||||
- **Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_schedule}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the security section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the `architect-checklist` and populate results here.]]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If project has UI components:
|
||||
|
||||
- Recommend engaging Design Architect agent
|
||||
- Use "Frontend Architecture Mode"
|
||||
- Provide this document as input
|
||||
|
||||
2. For all projects:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review with Product Owner
|
||||
- Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
- Set up infrastructure with DevOps agent
|
||||
|
||||
3. Include specific prompts for next agents if needed]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt to hand off to Design Architect for Frontend Architecture creation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key UI requirements from PRD
|
||||
- Any frontend-specific decisions made here
|
||||
- Request for detailed frontend architecture]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and coding standards
|
||||
- First epic/story to implement
|
||||
- Key technical decisions to follow]]
|
||||
650
bmad-core/templates/architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
650
bmad-core/templates/architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,650 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. If at a minimum you cannot locate docs/prd.md ask the user what docs will provide the basis for the architecture.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-content
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the overall project architecture for {{project_name}}, including backend systems, shared services, and non-UI specific concerns. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency and adherence to chosen patterns and technologies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Frontend Architecture:**
|
||||
If the project includes a significant user interface, a separate Frontend Architecture Document will detail the frontend-specific design and MUST be used in conjunction with this document. Core technology stack choices documented herein (see "Tech Stack") are definitive for the entire project, including any frontend components.
|
||||
- id: starter-template
|
||||
title: Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Before proceeding further with architecture design, check if the project is based on a starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and brainstorming brief for any mentions of:
|
||||
- Starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- Existing projects or codebases being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Boilerplate projects or scaffolding tools
|
||||
- Previous projects to be cloned or adapted
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.)
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-configured technology stack and versions
|
||||
- Project structure and organization patterns
|
||||
- Built-in scripts and tooling
|
||||
- Existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Any limitations or constraints imposed by the starter
|
||||
- Use this analysis to inform and align your architecture decisions
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter template is mentioned but this is a greenfield project:
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate starter templates based on the tech stack preferences
|
||||
- Explain the benefits (faster setup, best practices, community support)
|
||||
- Let the user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Proceed with architecture design from scratch
|
||||
- Note that manual setup will be required for all tooling and configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Document the decision here before proceeding with the architecture design. If none, just say N/A
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: high-level-architecture
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation of the architecture. Present all subsections together at once.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technical-summary
|
||||
title: Technical Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Provide a brief paragraph (3-5 sentences) overview of:
|
||||
- The system's overall architecture style
|
||||
- Key components and their relationships
|
||||
- Primary technology choices
|
||||
- Core architectural patterns being used
|
||||
- Reference back to the PRD goals and how this architecture supports them
|
||||
- id: high-level-overview
|
||||
title: High Level Overview
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the PRD's Technical Assumptions section, describe:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The main architectural style (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless, Event-Driven)
|
||||
2. Repository structure decision from PRD (Monorepo/Polyrepo)
|
||||
3. Service architecture decision from PRD
|
||||
4. Primary user interaction flow or data flow at a conceptual level
|
||||
5. Key architectural decisions and their rationale
|
||||
- id: project-diagram
|
||||
title: High Level Project Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a Mermaid diagram that visualizes the high-level architecture. Consider:
|
||||
- System boundaries
|
||||
- Major components/services
|
||||
- Data flow directions
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- User entry points
|
||||
|
||||
- id: architectural-patterns
|
||||
title: Architectural and Design Patterns
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List the key high-level patterns that will guide the architecture. For each pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present 2-3 viable options if multiple exist
|
||||
2. Provide your recommendation with clear rationale
|
||||
3. Get user confirmation before finalizing
|
||||
4. These patterns should align with the PRD's technical assumptions and project goals
|
||||
|
||||
Common patterns to consider:
|
||||
- Architectural style patterns (Serverless, Event-Driven, Microservices, CQRS, Hexagonal)
|
||||
- Code organization patterns (Dependency Injection, Repository, Module, Factory)
|
||||
- Data patterns (Event Sourcing, Saga, Database per Service)
|
||||
- Communication patterns (REST, GraphQL, Message Queue, Pub/Sub)
|
||||
template: "- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Serverless Architecture:** Using AWS Lambda for compute - _Rationale:_ Aligns with PRD requirement for cost optimization and automatic scaling"
|
||||
- "**Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility"
|
||||
- "**Event-Driven Communication:** Using SNS/SQS for service decoupling - _Rationale:_ Supports async processing and system resilience"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack
|
||||
title: Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection section. Work with the user to make specific choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD technical assumptions and any preferences from {root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml or an attached technical-preferences
|
||||
2. For each category, present 2-3 viable options with pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a clear recommendation based on project needs
|
||||
4. Get explicit user approval for each selection
|
||||
5. Document exact versions (avoid "latest" - pin specific versions)
|
||||
6. This table is the single source of truth - all other docs must reference these choices
|
||||
|
||||
Key decisions to finalize - before displaying the table, ensure you are aware of or ask the user about - let the user know if they are not sure on any that you can also provide suggestions with rationale:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (if any)
|
||||
- Languages and runtimes with exact versions
|
||||
- Frameworks and libraries / packages
|
||||
- Cloud provider and key services choices
|
||||
- Database and storage solutions - if unclear suggest sql or nosql or other types depending on the project and depending on cloud provider offer a suggestion
|
||||
- Development tools
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render of the table, ensure the user is aware of the importance of this sections choices, should also look for gaps or disagreements with anything, ask for any clarifications if something is unclear why its in the list, and also right away elicit feedback - this statement and the options should be rendered and then prompt right all before allowing user input.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: cloud-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Cloud Infrastructure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Provider:** {{cloud_provider}}
|
||||
- **Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
- id: technology-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
instruction: Populate the technology stack table with all relevant technologies
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "| **Language** | TypeScript | 5.3.3 | Primary development language | Strong typing, excellent tooling, team expertise |"
|
||||
- "| **Runtime** | Node.js | 20.11.0 | JavaScript runtime | LTS version, stable performance, wide ecosystem |"
|
||||
- "| **Framework** | NestJS | 10.3.2 | Backend framework | Enterprise-ready, good DI, matches team patterns |"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the core data models/entities:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
- {{relationship_1}}
|
||||
- {{relationship_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: components
|
||||
title: Components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services and their responsibilities
|
||||
2. Consider the repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo) from PRD
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-list
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: component-diagrams
|
||||
title: Component Diagrams
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-apis
|
||||
title: External APIs
|
||||
condition: Project requires external API integrations
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: core-workflows
|
||||
title: Core Workflows
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include error handling paths
|
||||
4. Document async operations
|
||||
5. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: rest-api-spec
|
||||
title: REST API Spec
|
||||
condition: Project includes REST API
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If the project includes a REST API:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
3. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
4. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
5. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use YAML format for better readability. If no REST API, skip this section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title: {{api_title}}
|
||||
version: {{api_version}}
|
||||
description: {{api_description}}
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: {{server_url}}
|
||||
description: {{server_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: database-schema
|
||||
title: Database Schema
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: source-tree
|
||||
title: Source Tree
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a project folder structure that reflects:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The chosen repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo)
|
||||
2. The service architecture (monolith/microservices/serverless)
|
||||
3. The selected tech stack and languages
|
||||
4. Component organization from above
|
||||
5. Best practices for the chosen frameworks
|
||||
6. Clear separation of concerns
|
||||
|
||||
Adapt the structure based on project needs. For monorepos, show service separation. For serverless, show function organization. Include language-specific conventions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
project-root/
|
||||
├── packages/
|
||||
│ ├── api/ # Backend API service
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared utilities/types
|
||||
│ └── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Monorepo management scripts
|
||||
└── package.json # Root package.json with workspaces
|
||||
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-deployment
|
||||
title: Infrastructure and Deployment
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the deployment architecture and practices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use IaC tool selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Choose deployment strategy appropriate for the architecture
|
||||
3. Define environments and promotion flow
|
||||
4. Establish rollback procedures
|
||||
5. Consider security, monitoring, and cost optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Get user input on deployment preferences and CI/CD tool choices.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-as-code
|
||||
title: Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Tool:** {{iac_tool}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Location:** `{{iac_directory}}`
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{iac_approach}}
|
||||
- id: deployment-strategy
|
||||
title: Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
- **CI/CD Platform:** {{cicd_platform}}
|
||||
- **Pipeline Configuration:** `{{pipeline_config_location}}`
|
||||
- id: environments
|
||||
title: Environments
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{env_name}}:** {{env_purpose}} - {{env_details}}"
|
||||
- id: promotion-flow
|
||||
title: Environment Promotion Flow
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{promotion_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: rollback-strategy
|
||||
title: Rollback Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
- **Trigger Conditions:** {{rollback_triggers}}
|
||||
- **Recovery Time Objective:** {{rto}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: error-handling-strategy
|
||||
title: Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define comprehensive error handling approach:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Choose appropriate patterns for the language/framework from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Define logging standards and tools
|
||||
3. Establish error categories and handling rules
|
||||
4. Consider observability and debugging needs
|
||||
5. Ensure security (no sensitive data in logs)
|
||||
|
||||
This section guides both AI and human developers in consistent error handling.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: general-approach
|
||||
title: General Approach
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Error Model:** {{error_model}}
|
||||
- **Exception Hierarchy:** {{exception_structure}}
|
||||
- **Error Propagation:** {{propagation_rules}}
|
||||
- id: logging-standards
|
||||
title: Logging Standards
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Library:** {{logging_library}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Format:** {{log_format}}
|
||||
- **Levels:** {{log_levels_definition}}
|
||||
- **Required Context:**
|
||||
- Correlation ID: {{correlation_id_format}}
|
||||
- Service Context: {{service_context}}
|
||||
- User Context: {{user_context_rules}}
|
||||
- id: error-patterns
|
||||
title: Error Handling Patterns
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: external-api-errors
|
||||
title: External API Errors
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Retry Policy:** {{retry_strategy}}
|
||||
- **Circuit Breaker:** {{circuit_breaker_config}}
|
||||
- **Timeout Configuration:** {{timeout_settings}}
|
||||
- **Error Translation:** {{error_mapping_rules}}
|
||||
- id: business-logic-errors
|
||||
title: Business Logic Errors
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Custom Exceptions:** {{business_exception_types}}
|
||||
- **User-Facing Errors:** {{user_error_format}}
|
||||
- **Error Codes:** {{error_code_system}}
|
||||
- id: data-consistency
|
||||
title: Data Consistency
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Transaction Strategy:** {{transaction_approach}}
|
||||
- **Compensation Logic:** {{compensation_patterns}}
|
||||
- **Idempotency:** {{idempotency_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
These standards are MANDATORY for AI agents. Work with user to define ONLY the critical rules needed to prevent bad code. Explain that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This section directly controls AI developer behavior
|
||||
2. Keep it minimal - assume AI knows general best practices
|
||||
3. Focus on project-specific conventions and gotchas
|
||||
4. Overly detailed standards bloat context and slow development
|
||||
5. Standards will be extracted to separate file for dev agent use
|
||||
|
||||
For each standard, get explicit user confirmation it's necessary.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: core-standards
|
||||
title: Core Standards
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Languages & Runtimes:** {{languages_and_versions}}
|
||||
- **Style & Linting:** {{linter_config}}
|
||||
- **Test Organization:** {{test_file_convention}}
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Element, Convention, Example]
|
||||
instruction: Only include if deviating from language defaults
|
||||
- id: critical-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Rules
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List ONLY rules that AI might violate or project-specific requirements. Examples:
|
||||
- "Never use console.log in production code - use logger"
|
||||
- "All API responses must use ApiResponse wrapper type"
|
||||
- "Database queries must use repository pattern, never direct ORM"
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid obvious rules like "use SOLID principles" or "write clean code"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}"
|
||||
- id: language-specifics
|
||||
title: Language-Specific Guidelines
|
||||
condition: Critical language-specific rules needed
|
||||
instruction: Add ONLY if critical for preventing AI mistakes. Most teams don't need this section.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: language-rules
|
||||
title: "{{language_name}} Specifics"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_topic}}:** {{rule_detail}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: test-strategy
|
||||
title: Test Strategy and Standards
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Work with user to define comprehensive test strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use test frameworks from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Decide on TDD vs test-after approach
|
||||
3. Define test organization and naming
|
||||
4. Establish coverage goals
|
||||
5. Determine integration test infrastructure
|
||||
6. Plan for test data and external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Basic info goes in Coding Standards for dev agent. This detailed section is for QA agent and team reference.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-philosophy
|
||||
title: Testing Philosophy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Goals:** {{coverage_targets}}
|
||||
- **Test Pyramid:** {{test_distribution}}
|
||||
- id: test-types
|
||||
title: Test Types and Organization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: unit-tests
|
||||
title: Unit Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{unit_test_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **File Convention:** {{unit_test_naming}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{unit_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Mocking Library:** {{mocking_library}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Requirement:** {{unit_coverage}}
|
||||
|
||||
**AI Agent Requirements:**
|
||||
- Generate tests for all public methods
|
||||
- Cover edge cases and error conditions
|
||||
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
|
||||
- Mock all external dependencies
|
||||
- id: integration-tests
|
||||
title: Integration Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_scope}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{integration_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Test Infrastructure:**
|
||||
- **{{dependency_name}}:** {{test_approach}} ({{test_tool}})
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Database:** In-memory H2 for unit tests, Testcontainers PostgreSQL for integration"
|
||||
- "**Message Queue:** Embedded Kafka for tests"
|
||||
- "**External APIs:** WireMock for stubbing"
|
||||
- id: e2e-tests
|
||||
title: End-to-End Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{e2e_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{e2e_scope}}
|
||||
- **Environment:** {{e2e_environment}}
|
||||
- **Test Data:** {{e2e_data_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: test-data-management
|
||||
title: Test Data Management
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{test_data_approach}}
|
||||
- **Fixtures:** {{fixture_location}}
|
||||
- **Factories:** {{factory_pattern}}
|
||||
- **Cleanup:** {{cleanup_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: continuous-testing
|
||||
title: Continuous Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **CI Integration:** {{ci_test_stages}}
|
||||
- **Performance Tests:** {{perf_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Security Tests:** {{security_test_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security
|
||||
title: Security
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define MANDATORY security requirements for AI and human developers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Focus on implementation-specific rules
|
||||
2. Reference security tools from Tech Stack
|
||||
3. Define clear patterns for common scenarios
|
||||
4. These rules directly impact code generation
|
||||
5. Work with user to ensure completeness without redundancy
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: input-validation
|
||||
title: Input Validation
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Validation Library:** {{validation_library}}
|
||||
- **Validation Location:** {{where_to_validate}}
|
||||
- **Required Rules:**
|
||||
- All external inputs MUST be validated
|
||||
- Validation at API boundary before processing
|
||||
- Whitelist approach preferred over blacklist
|
||||
- id: auth-authorization
|
||||
title: Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Auth Method:** {{auth_implementation}}
|
||||
- **Session Management:** {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- **Required Patterns:**
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_1}}
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_2}}
|
||||
- id: secrets-management
|
||||
title: Secrets Management
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Development:** {{dev_secrets_approach}}
|
||||
- **Production:** {{prod_secrets_service}}
|
||||
- **Code Requirements:**
|
||||
- NEVER hardcode secrets
|
||||
- Access via configuration service only
|
||||
- No secrets in logs or error messages
|
||||
- id: api-security
|
||||
title: API Security
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Rate Limiting:** {{rate_limit_implementation}}
|
||||
- **CORS Policy:** {{cors_configuration}}
|
||||
- **Security Headers:** {{required_headers}}
|
||||
- **HTTPS Enforcement:** {{https_approach}}
|
||||
- id: data-protection
|
||||
title: Data Protection
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Encryption at Rest:** {{encryption_at_rest}}
|
||||
- **Encryption in Transit:** {{encryption_in_transit}}
|
||||
- **PII Handling:** {{pii_rules}}
|
||||
- **Logging Restrictions:** {{what_not_to_log}}
|
||||
- id: dependency-security
|
||||
title: Dependency Security
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scanning Tool:** {{dependency_scanner}}
|
||||
- **Update Policy:** {{update_frequency}}
|
||||
- **Approval Process:** {{new_dep_process}}
|
||||
- id: security-testing
|
||||
title: Security Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **SAST Tool:** {{static_analysis}}
|
||||
- **DAST Tool:** {{dynamic_analysis}}
|
||||
- **Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_schedule}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the architect-checklist and populate results here.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If project has UI components:
|
||||
- Use "Frontend Architecture Mode"
|
||||
- Provide this document as input
|
||||
|
||||
2. For all projects:
|
||||
- Review with Product Owner
|
||||
- Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
- Set up infrastructure with DevOps agent
|
||||
|
||||
3. Include specific prompts for next agents if needed
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: architect-prompt
|
||||
title: Architect Prompt
|
||||
condition: Project has UI components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt to hand off to Architect for Frontend Architecture creation. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key UI requirements from PRD
|
||||
- Any frontend-specific decisions made here
|
||||
- Request for detailed frontend architecture
|
||||
@@ -1,149 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/brainstorming-session-results.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Brainstorming Session Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Date:** [DATE]
|
||||
**Facilitator:** [Agent Role] [Agent Name]
|
||||
**Participant:** [USER NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Topic:** [SESSION TOPIC]
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Goals:** [STATED GOALS]
|
||||
|
||||
**Techniques Used:** [LIST OF TECHNIQUES AND DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Ideas Generated:** [NUMBER]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Themes Identified:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [THEME 1]
|
||||
- [THEME 2]
|
||||
- [THEME 3]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technique Sessions
|
||||
|
||||
### [TECHNIQUE NAME 1] - [DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
**Description:** [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Ideas Generated:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. [USER IDEA 1]
|
||||
2. [USER IDEA 2]
|
||||
3. [USER IDEA 3]
|
||||
[etc.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Insights Discovered:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 1]
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Notable Connections:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [CONNECTION OR PATTERN IDENTIFIED]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### [TECHNIQUE NAME 2] - [DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
[Repeat format for each technique used]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Idea Categorization
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
*Ideas ready to implement now*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Why immediate: [RATIONALE]
|
||||
- Resources needed: [BASIC REQUIREMENTS]
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Innovations
|
||||
|
||||
*Ideas requiring development/research*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Development needed: [WHAT'S REQUIRED]
|
||||
- Timeline estimate: [ROUGH TIMEFRAME]
|
||||
|
||||
### Moonshots
|
||||
|
||||
*Ambitious, transformative concepts*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Transformative potential: [WHY IT'S A MOONSHOT]
|
||||
- Challenges to overcome: [MAJOR OBSTACLES]
|
||||
|
||||
### Insights & Learnings
|
||||
|
||||
*Key realizations from the session*
|
||||
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 1]: [DESCRIPTION AND IMPLICATIONS]
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 2]: [DESCRIPTION AND IMPLICATIONS]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Planning
|
||||
|
||||
### Top 3 Priority Ideas
|
||||
|
||||
**#1 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- Rationale: [WHY THIS IS TOP PRIORITY]
|
||||
- Next steps: [SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO TAKE]
|
||||
- Resources needed: [WHAT'S REQUIRED]
|
||||
- Timeline: [WHEN TO START/COMPLETE]
|
||||
|
||||
**#2 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Same format]
|
||||
|
||||
**#3 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Same format]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Reflection & Follow-up
|
||||
|
||||
### What Worked Well
|
||||
|
||||
- [SUCCESSFUL ASPECT 1]
|
||||
- [SUCCESSFUL ASPECT 2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Areas for Further Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
- [AREA 1]: [WHY IT NEEDS MORE EXPLORATION]
|
||||
- [AREA 2]: [WHY IT NEEDS MORE EXPLORATION]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Follow-up Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
- [TECHNIQUE 1]: [WHY IT WOULD BE HELPFUL]
|
||||
- [TECHNIQUE 2]: [WHY IT WOULD BE HELPFUL]
|
||||
|
||||
### Questions That Emerged
|
||||
|
||||
- [QUESTION 1]
|
||||
- [QUESTION 2]
|
||||
- [QUESTION 3]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Session Planning
|
||||
|
||||
- **Suggested topics:** [FOLLOW-UP TOPICS]
|
||||
- **Recommended timeframe:** [WHEN TO RECONVENE]
|
||||
- **Preparation needed:** [WHAT TO RESEARCH/PREPARE]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Session facilitated using the BMAD-METHOD brainstorming framework*
|
||||
156
bmad-core/templates/brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
156
bmad-core/templates/brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brainstorming-output-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brainstorming Session Results
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/brainstorming-session-results.md
|
||||
title: "Brainstorming Session Results"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: non-interactive
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: header
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
**Session Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Facilitator:** {{agent_role}} {{agent_name}}
|
||||
**Participant:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: summary-details
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Topic:** {{session_topic}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Goals:** {{stated_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Techniques Used:** {{techniques_list}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Ideas Generated:** {{total_ideas}}
|
||||
- id: key-themes
|
||||
title: "Key Themes Identified:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{theme}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technique-sessions
|
||||
title: Technique Sessions
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technique
|
||||
title: "{{technique_name}} - {{duration}}"
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: description
|
||||
template: "**Description:** {{technique_description}}"
|
||||
- id: ideas-generated
|
||||
title: "Ideas Generated:"
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{idea}}"
|
||||
- id: insights
|
||||
title: "Insights Discovered:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{insight}}"
|
||||
- id: connections
|
||||
title: "Notable Connections:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{connection}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: idea-categorization
|
||||
title: Idea Categorization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-opportunities
|
||||
title: Immediate Opportunities
|
||||
content: "*Ideas ready to implement now*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Why immediate: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{requirements}}
|
||||
- id: future-innovations
|
||||
title: Future Innovations
|
||||
content: "*Ideas requiring development/research*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Development needed: {{development_needed}}
|
||||
- Timeline estimate: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: moonshots
|
||||
title: Moonshots
|
||||
content: "*Ambitious, transformative concepts*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Transformative potential: {{potential}}
|
||||
- Challenges to overcome: {{challenges}}
|
||||
- id: insights-learnings
|
||||
title: Insights & Learnings
|
||||
content: "*Key realizations from the session*"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{insight}}: {{description_and_implications}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: action-planning
|
||||
title: Action Planning
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: top-priorities
|
||||
title: Top 3 Priority Ideas
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: priority-1
|
||||
title: "#1 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: priority-2
|
||||
title: "#2 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: priority-3
|
||||
title: "#3 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: reflection-followup
|
||||
title: Reflection & Follow-up
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: what-worked
|
||||
title: What Worked Well
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{aspect}}"
|
||||
- id: areas-exploration
|
||||
title: Areas for Further Exploration
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{area}}: {{reason}}"
|
||||
- id: recommended-techniques
|
||||
title: Recommended Follow-up Techniques
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{technique}}: {{reason}}"
|
||||
- id: questions-emerged
|
||||
title: Questions That Emerged
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{question}}"
|
||||
- id: next-session
|
||||
title: Next Session Planning
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Suggested topics:** {{followup_topics}}
|
||||
- **Recommended timeframe:** {{timeframe}}
|
||||
- **Preparation needed:** {{preparation}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: footer
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Session facilitated using the BMAD-METHOD brainstorming framework*
|
||||
@@ -1,544 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Brownfield Enhancement Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: IMPORTANT - SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This architecture document is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive architectural planning. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Complexity**: Confirm this enhancement requires architectural planning. For simple additions, recommend: "For simpler changes that don't require architectural planning, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **REQUIRED INPUTS**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Completed brownfield-prd.md
|
||||
- Existing project technical documentation (from docs folder or user-provided)
|
||||
- Access to existing project structure (IDE or uploaded files)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **DEEP ANALYSIS MANDATE**: You MUST conduct thorough analysis of the existing codebase, architecture patterns, and technical constraints before making ANY architectural recommendations. Every suggestion must be based on actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **CONTINUOUS VALIDATION**: Throughout this process, explicitly validate your understanding with the user. For every architectural decision, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing system, I recommend [decision] because [evidence from actual project]. Does this align with your system's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
If any required inputs are missing, request them before proceeding.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section establishes the document's purpose and scope for brownfield enhancements. Keep the content below but ensure project name and enhancement details are properly substituted.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the architectural approach for enhancing {{Project Name}} with {{Enhancement Description}}. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development of new features while ensuring seamless integration with the existing system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Existing Architecture:**
|
||||
This document supplements existing project architecture by defining how new components will integrate with current systems. Where conflicts arise between new and existing patterns, this document provides guidance on maintaining consistency while implementing enhancements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze the existing project structure and architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review existing documentation in docs folder
|
||||
2. Examine current technology stack and versions
|
||||
3. Identify existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
4. Note current deployment and infrastructure setup
|
||||
5. Document any constraints or limitations
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: After your analysis, explicitly validate your findings: "Based on my analysis of your project, I've identified the following about your existing system: [key findings]. Please confirm these observations are accurate before I proceed with architectural recommendations."
|
||||
|
||||
Present findings and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Project State:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Purpose:** {{existing_project_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Current Tech Stack:** {{existing_tech_summary}}
|
||||
- **Architecture Style:** {{existing_architecture_style}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{existing_deployment_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Available Documentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{existing_docs_summary}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Identified Constraints:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{constraint_1}}
|
||||
- {{constraint_2}}
|
||||
- {{constraint_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Change | Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| ------ | ---- | ------- | ----------- | ------ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhancement Scope and Integration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will integrate with the existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the brownfield PRD enhancement scope
|
||||
2. Identify integration points with existing code
|
||||
3. Define boundaries between new and existing functionality
|
||||
4. Establish compatibility requirements
|
||||
|
||||
VALIDATION CHECKPOINT: Before presenting the integration strategy, confirm: "Based on my analysis, the integration approach I'm proposing takes into account [specific existing system characteristics]. These integration points and boundaries respect your current architecture patterns. Is this assessment accurate?"
|
||||
|
||||
Present complete integration strategy and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Type:** {{enhancement_type}}
|
||||
**Scope:** {{enhancement_scope}}
|
||||
**Integration Impact:** {{integration_impact_level}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Integration Strategy:** {{code_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**Database Integration:** {{database_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**API Integration:** {{api_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**UI Integration:** {{ui_integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Database Schema Compatibility:** {{db_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **UI/UX Consistency:** {{ui_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Performance Impact:** {{performance_constraints}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Tech Stack Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure new components align with existing technology choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing technology stack as the foundation
|
||||
2. Only introduce new technologies if absolutely necessary
|
||||
3. Justify any new additions with clear rationale
|
||||
4. Ensure version compatibility with existing dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Present complete tech stack alignment and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document the current stack that must be maintained or integrated with]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Current Technology | Version | Usage in Enhancement | Notes |
|
||||
| :----------------- | :----------------- | :---------- | :------------------- | :-------- |
|
||||
| **Language** | {{language}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | {{runtime}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Database** | {{database}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **API Style** | {{api_style}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Authentication** | {{auth}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### New Technology Additions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if new technologies are required for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_tech^^
|
||||
|
||||
| Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale | Integration Method |
|
||||
| :----------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------ | :----------------- |
|
||||
| {{new_tech}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{rationale}} | {{integration}} |
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_tech^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Models and Schema Changes
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new data models and how they integrate with existing schema:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new entities required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define relationships with existing data models
|
||||
3. Plan database schema changes (additions, modifications)
|
||||
4. Ensure backward compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
Present data model changes and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New Data Models
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_data_model>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{model_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
**Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **With Existing:** {{existing_relationships}}
|
||||
- **With New:** {{new_relationships}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Integration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Database Changes Required:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **New Tables:** {{new_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **Modified Tables:** {{modified_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **New Indexes:** {{new_indexes_list}}
|
||||
- **Migration Strategy:** {{migration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward Compatibility:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_1}}
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new components and their integration with existing architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new components required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define interfaces with existing components
|
||||
3. Establish clear boundaries and responsibilities
|
||||
4. Plan integration points and data flow
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY VALIDATION: Before presenting component architecture, confirm: "The new components I'm proposing follow the existing architectural patterns I identified in your codebase: [specific patterns]. The integration interfaces respect your current component structure and communication patterns. Does this match your project's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
Present component architecture and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New Components
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_component>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{integration_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing Components:** {{existing_dependencies}}
|
||||
- **New Components:** {{new_dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Interaction Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create Mermaid diagram showing how new components interact with existing ones]]
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{component_interaction_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## API Design and Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new API endpoints and integration with existing APIs:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Plan new API endpoints required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Ensure consistency with existing API patterns
|
||||
3. Define authentication and authorization integration
|
||||
4. Plan versioning strategy if needed
|
||||
|
||||
Present API design and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New API Endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy:** {{api_integration_strategy}}
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{auth_integration}}
|
||||
**Versioning:** {{versioning_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_endpoint>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{endpoint_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Method:** {{http_method}}
|
||||
- **Endpoint:** {{endpoint_path}}
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Request:**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{{request_schema}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{{response_schema}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
## External API Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document new external API integrations required for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: external_api>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{api_name}} API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL:** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Integration Method:** {{integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Error Handling:** {{error_handling_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Source Tree Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how new code will integrate with existing project structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing project organization patterns
|
||||
2. Identify where new files/folders will be placed
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing naming conventions
|
||||
4. Plan for minimal disruption to existing structure
|
||||
|
||||
Present integration plan and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document relevant parts of current structure]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{existing_structure_relevant_parts}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### New File Organization
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Show only new additions to existing structure]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── {{existing_structure_context}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{new_folder_1}}/ # {{purpose_1}}
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{new_file_1}}
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_2}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{existing_folder}}/ # Existing folder with additions
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{existing_file}} # Existing file
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_3}} # New addition
|
||||
│ └── {{new_folder_2}}/ # {{purpose_2}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **File Naming:** {{file_naming_consistency}}
|
||||
- **Folder Organization:** {{folder_organization_approach}}
|
||||
- **Import/Export Patterns:** {{import_export_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure and Deployment Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will be deployed alongside existing infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing deployment pipeline and infrastructure
|
||||
2. Identify any infrastructure changes needed
|
||||
3. Plan deployment strategy to minimize risk
|
||||
4. Define rollback procedures
|
||||
|
||||
Present deployment integration and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Deployment:** {{existing_deployment_summary}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Tools:** {{existing_infrastructure_tools}}
|
||||
**Environments:** {{existing_environments}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Deployment Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment Approach:** {{deployment_approach}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Changes:** {{infrastructure_changes}}
|
||||
**Pipeline Integration:** {{pipeline_integration}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Rollback Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Rollback Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:** {{risk_mitigation}}
|
||||
**Monitoring:** {{monitoring_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Coding Standards and Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure new code follows existing project conventions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document existing coding standards from project analysis
|
||||
2. Identify any enhancement-specific requirements
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing codebase patterns
|
||||
4. Define standards for new code organization
|
||||
|
||||
Present coding standards and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Standards Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Style:** {{existing_code_style}}
|
||||
**Linting Rules:** {{existing_linting}}
|
||||
**Testing Patterns:** {{existing_test_patterns}}
|
||||
**Documentation Style:** {{existing_doc_style}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement-Specific Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if new patterns are needed for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: enhancement_standard>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{standard_name}}:** {{standard_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Integration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility_rule}}
|
||||
- **Database Integration:** {{db_integration_rule}}
|
||||
- **Error Handling:** {{error_handling_integration}}
|
||||
- **Logging Consistency:** {{logging_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define testing approach for the enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Integrate with existing test suite
|
||||
2. Ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
3. Plan for testing new features
|
||||
4. Define integration testing approach
|
||||
|
||||
Present testing strategy and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Existing Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing Test Framework:** {{existing_test_framework}}
|
||||
**Test Organization:** {{existing_test_organization}}
|
||||
**Coverage Requirements:** {{existing_coverage_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### New Testing Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Unit Tests for New Components
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{test_framework}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{test_location}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Target:** {{coverage_target}}
|
||||
- **Integration with Existing:** {{test_integration}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_test_scope}}
|
||||
- **Existing System Verification:** {{existing_system_verification}}
|
||||
- **New Feature Testing:** {{new_feature_testing}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Regression Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing Feature Verification:** {{regression_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Automated Regression Suite:** {{automated_regression}}
|
||||
- **Manual Testing Requirements:** {{manual_testing_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure security consistency with existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing security patterns and tools
|
||||
2. Ensure new features don't introduce vulnerabilities
|
||||
3. Maintain existing security posture
|
||||
4. Define security testing for new components
|
||||
|
||||
Present security integration and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Security Measures
|
||||
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{existing_auth}}
|
||||
**Authorization:** {{existing_authz}}
|
||||
**Data Protection:** {{existing_data_protection}}
|
||||
**Security Tools:** {{existing_security_tools}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Security Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**New Security Measures:** {{new_security_measures}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{security_integration_points}}
|
||||
**Compliance Requirements:** {{compliance_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing Security Tests:** {{existing_security_tests}}
|
||||
**New Security Test Requirements:** {{new_security_tests}}
|
||||
**Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify and plan for risks specific to brownfield development:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Technical integration risks
|
||||
2. Deployment and operational risks
|
||||
3. User impact and compatibility risks
|
||||
4. Mitigation strategies for each risk
|
||||
|
||||
Present risk assessment and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Risks
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: technical_risk>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk:** {{risk_description}}
|
||||
**Impact:** {{impact_level}}
|
||||
**Likelihood:** {{likelihood}}
|
||||
**Mitigation:** {{mitigation_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Operational Risks
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: operational_risk>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk:** {{risk_description}}
|
||||
**Impact:** {{impact_level}}
|
||||
**Likelihood:** {{likelihood}}
|
||||
**Mitigation:** {{mitigation_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Monitoring and Alerting
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhanced Monitoring:** {{monitoring_additions}}
|
||||
**New Alerts:** {{new_alerts}}
|
||||
**Performance Monitoring:** {{performance_monitoring}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Execute the architect-checklist and populate results here, focusing on brownfield-specific validation]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the brownfield architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review integration points with existing system
|
||||
2. Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
3. Set up deployment pipeline integration
|
||||
4. Plan rollback and monitoring procedures]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Story Manager Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for Story Manager to work with this brownfield enhancement. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key integration requirements validated with user
|
||||
- Existing system constraints based on actual project analysis
|
||||
- First story to implement with clear integration checkpoints
|
||||
- Emphasis on maintaining existing system integrity throughout implementation]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and existing coding standards analyzed from actual project
|
||||
- Integration requirements with existing codebase validated with user
|
||||
- Key technical decisions based on real project constraints
|
||||
- Existing system compatibility requirements with specific verification steps
|
||||
- Clear sequencing of implementation to minimize risk to existing functionality]]
|
||||
476
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
476
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brownfield-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brownfield Enhancement Architecture
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Brownfield Enhancement Architecture"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
IMPORTANT - SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This architecture document is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive architectural planning. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Complexity**: Confirm this enhancement requires architectural planning. For simple additions, recommend: "For simpler changes that don't require architectural planning, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **REQUIRED INPUTS**:
|
||||
- Completed brownfield-prd.md
|
||||
- Existing project technical documentation (from docs folder or user-provided)
|
||||
- Access to existing project structure (IDE or uploaded files)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **DEEP ANALYSIS MANDATE**: You MUST conduct thorough analysis of the existing codebase, architecture patterns, and technical constraints before making ANY architectural recommendations. Every suggestion must be based on actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **CONTINUOUS VALIDATION**: Throughout this process, explicitly validate your understanding with the user. For every architectural decision, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing system, I recommend [decision] because [evidence from actual project]. Does this align with your system's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
If any required inputs are missing, request them before proceeding.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-content
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the architectural approach for enhancing {{project_name}} with {{enhancement_description}}. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development of new features while ensuring seamless integration with the existing system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Existing Architecture:**
|
||||
This document supplements existing project architecture by defining how new components will integrate with current systems. Where conflicts arise between new and existing patterns, this document provides guidance on maintaining consistency while implementing enhancements.
|
||||
- id: existing-project-analysis
|
||||
title: Existing Project Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Analyze the existing project structure and architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review existing documentation in docs folder
|
||||
2. Examine current technology stack and versions
|
||||
3. Identify existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
4. Note current deployment and infrastructure setup
|
||||
5. Document any constraints or limitations
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: After your analysis, explicitly validate your findings: "Based on my analysis of your project, I've identified the following about your existing system: [key findings]. Please confirm these observations are accurate before I proceed with architectural recommendations."
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: current-state
|
||||
title: Current Project State
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary Purpose:** {{existing_project_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Current Tech Stack:** {{existing_tech_summary}}
|
||||
- **Architecture Style:** {{existing_architecture_style}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{existing_deployment_approach}}
|
||||
- id: available-docs
|
||||
title: Available Documentation
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{existing_docs_summary}}"
|
||||
- id: constraints
|
||||
title: Identified Constraints
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{constraint}}"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Change, Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: enhancement-scope
|
||||
title: Enhancement Scope and Integration Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how the enhancement will integrate with the existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the brownfield PRD enhancement scope
|
||||
2. Identify integration points with existing code
|
||||
3. Define boundaries between new and existing functionality
|
||||
4. Establish compatibility requirements
|
||||
|
||||
VALIDATION CHECKPOINT: Before presenting the integration strategy, confirm: "Based on my analysis, the integration approach I'm proposing takes into account [specific existing system characteristics]. These integration points and boundaries respect your current architecture patterns. Is this assessment accurate?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: enhancement-overview
|
||||
title: Enhancement Overview
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Enhancement Type:** {{enhancement_type}}
|
||||
**Scope:** {{enhancement_scope}}
|
||||
**Integration Impact:** {{integration_impact_level}}
|
||||
- id: integration-approach
|
||||
title: Integration Approach
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Code Integration Strategy:** {{code_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**Database Integration:** {{database_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**API Integration:** {{api_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**UI Integration:** {{ui_integration_approach}}
|
||||
- id: compatibility-requirements
|
||||
title: Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Database Schema Compatibility:** {{db_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **UI/UX Consistency:** {{ui_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Performance Impact:** {{performance_constraints}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-alignment
|
||||
title: Tech Stack Alignment
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure new components align with existing technology choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing technology stack as the foundation
|
||||
2. Only introduce new technologies if absolutely necessary
|
||||
3. Justify any new additions with clear rationale
|
||||
4. Ensure version compatibility with existing dependencies
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-stack
|
||||
title: Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Current Technology, Version, Usage in Enhancement, Notes]
|
||||
instruction: Document the current stack that must be maintained or integrated with
|
||||
- id: new-tech-additions
|
||||
title: New Technology Additions
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires new technologies
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale, Integration Method]
|
||||
instruction: Only include if new technologies are required for the enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models and Schema Changes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new data models and how they integrate with existing schema:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new entities required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define relationships with existing data models
|
||||
3. Plan database schema changes (additions, modifications)
|
||||
4. Ensure backward compatibility
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: new-models
|
||||
title: New Data Models
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
**Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
- **With Existing:** {{existing_relationships}}
|
||||
- **With New:** {{new_relationships}}
|
||||
- id: schema-integration
|
||||
title: Schema Integration Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Database Changes Required:**
|
||||
- **New Tables:** {{new_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **Modified Tables:** {{modified_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **New Indexes:** {{new_indexes_list}}
|
||||
- **Migration Strategy:** {{migration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward Compatibility:**
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_1}}
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-architecture
|
||||
title: Component Architecture
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new components and their integration with existing architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new components required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define interfaces with existing components
|
||||
3. Establish clear boundaries and responsibilities
|
||||
4. Plan integration points and data flow
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY VALIDATION: Before presenting component architecture, confirm: "The new components I'm proposing follow the existing architectural patterns I identified in your codebase: [specific patterns]. The integration interfaces respect your current component structure and communication patterns. Does this match your project's reality?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: new-components
|
||||
title: New Components
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{integration_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:**
|
||||
- **Existing Components:** {{existing_dependencies}}
|
||||
- **New Components:** {{new_dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: interaction-diagram
|
||||
title: Component Interaction Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: Create Mermaid diagram showing how new components interact with existing ones
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-design
|
||||
title: API Design and Integration
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires API changes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new API endpoints and integration with existing APIs:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Plan new API endpoints required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Ensure consistency with existing API patterns
|
||||
3. Define authentication and authorization integration
|
||||
4. Plan versioning strategy if needed
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api-strategy
|
||||
title: API Integration Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy:** {{api_integration_strategy}}
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{auth_integration}}
|
||||
**Versioning:** {{versioning_approach}}
|
||||
- id: new-endpoints
|
||||
title: New API Endpoints
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: endpoint
|
||||
title: "{{endpoint_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Method:** {{http_method}}
|
||||
- **Endpoint:** {{endpoint_path}}
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: request
|
||||
title: Request
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: json
|
||||
template: "{{request_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: response
|
||||
title: Response
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: json
|
||||
template: "{{response_schema}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-api-integration
|
||||
title: External API Integration
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires new external APIs
|
||||
instruction: Document new external API integrations required for the enhancement
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: external-api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL:** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Integration Method:** {{integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Error Handling:** {{error_handling_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: source-tree-integration
|
||||
title: Source Tree Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how new code will integrate with existing project structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing project organization patterns
|
||||
2. Identify where new files/folders will be placed
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing naming conventions
|
||||
4. Plan for minimal disruption to existing structure
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-structure
|
||||
title: Existing Project Structure
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: Document relevant parts of current structure
|
||||
template: "{{existing_structure_relevant_parts}}"
|
||||
- id: new-file-organization
|
||||
title: New File Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: Show only new additions to existing structure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── {{existing_structure_context}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{new_folder_1}}/ # {{purpose_1}}
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{new_file_1}}
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_2}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{existing_folder}}/ # Existing folder with additions
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{existing_file}} # Existing file
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_3}} # New addition
|
||||
│ └── {{new_folder_2}}/ # {{purpose_2}}
|
||||
- id: integration-guidelines
|
||||
title: Integration Guidelines
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **File Naming:** {{file_naming_consistency}}
|
||||
- **Folder Organization:** {{folder_organization_approach}}
|
||||
- **Import/Export Patterns:** {{import_export_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-deployment
|
||||
title: Infrastructure and Deployment Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how the enhancement will be deployed alongside existing infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing deployment pipeline and infrastructure
|
||||
2. Identify any infrastructure changes needed
|
||||
3. Plan deployment strategy to minimize risk
|
||||
4. Define rollback procedures
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Existing Infrastructure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Current Deployment:** {{existing_deployment_summary}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Tools:** {{existing_infrastructure_tools}}
|
||||
**Environments:** {{existing_environments}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-deployment
|
||||
title: Enhancement Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Deployment Approach:** {{deployment_approach}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Changes:** {{infrastructure_changes}}
|
||||
**Pipeline Integration:** {{pipeline_integration}}
|
||||
- id: rollback-strategy
|
||||
title: Rollback Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Rollback Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:** {{risk_mitigation}}
|
||||
**Monitoring:** {{monitoring_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards and Conventions
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure new code follows existing project conventions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document existing coding standards from project analysis
|
||||
2. Identify any enhancement-specific requirements
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing codebase patterns
|
||||
4. Define standards for new code organization
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-standards
|
||||
title: Existing Standards Compliance
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Code Style:** {{existing_code_style}}
|
||||
**Linting Rules:** {{existing_linting}}
|
||||
**Testing Patterns:** {{existing_test_patterns}}
|
||||
**Documentation Style:** {{existing_doc_style}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-standards
|
||||
title: Enhancement-Specific Standards
|
||||
condition: New patterns needed for enhancement
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{standard_name}}:** {{standard_description}}"
|
||||
- id: integration-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Integration Rules
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility_rule}}
|
||||
- **Database Integration:** {{db_integration_rule}}
|
||||
- **Error Handling:** {{error_handling_integration}}
|
||||
- **Logging Consistency:** {{logging_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define testing approach for the enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Integrate with existing test suite
|
||||
2. Ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
3. Plan for testing new features
|
||||
4. Define integration testing approach
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-test-integration
|
||||
title: Integration with Existing Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Existing Test Framework:** {{existing_test_framework}}
|
||||
**Test Organization:** {{existing_test_organization}}
|
||||
**Coverage Requirements:** {{existing_coverage_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: new-testing
|
||||
title: New Testing Requirements
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: unit-tests
|
||||
title: Unit Tests for New Components
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{test_framework}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{test_location}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Target:** {{coverage_target}}
|
||||
- **Integration with Existing:** {{test_integration}}
|
||||
- id: integration-tests
|
||||
title: Integration Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_test_scope}}
|
||||
- **Existing System Verification:** {{existing_system_verification}}
|
||||
- **New Feature Testing:** {{new_feature_testing}}
|
||||
- id: regression-tests
|
||||
title: Regression Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing Feature Verification:** {{regression_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Automated Regression Suite:** {{automated_regression}}
|
||||
- **Manual Testing Requirements:** {{manual_testing_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security-integration
|
||||
title: Security Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure security consistency with existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing security patterns and tools
|
||||
2. Ensure new features don't introduce vulnerabilities
|
||||
3. Maintain existing security posture
|
||||
4. Define security testing for new components
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-security
|
||||
title: Existing Security Measures
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{existing_auth}}
|
||||
**Authorization:** {{existing_authz}}
|
||||
**Data Protection:** {{existing_data_protection}}
|
||||
**Security Tools:** {{existing_security_tools}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-security
|
||||
title: Enhancement Security Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**New Security Measures:** {{new_security_measures}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{security_integration_points}}
|
||||
**Compliance Requirements:** {{compliance_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: security-testing
|
||||
title: Security Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Existing Security Tests:** {{existing_security_tests}}
|
||||
**New Security Test Requirements:** {{new_security_tests}}
|
||||
**Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Execute the architect-checklist and populate results here, focusing on brownfield-specific validation
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the brownfield architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review integration points with existing system
|
||||
2. Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
3. Set up deployment pipeline integration
|
||||
4. Plan rollback and monitoring procedures
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: story-manager-handoff
|
||||
title: Story Manager Handoff
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt for Story Manager to work with this brownfield enhancement. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key integration requirements validated with user
|
||||
- Existing system constraints based on actual project analysis
|
||||
- First story to implement with clear integration checkpoints
|
||||
- Emphasis on maintaining existing system integrity throughout implementation
|
||||
- id: developer-handoff
|
||||
title: Developer Handoff
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and existing coding standards analyzed from actual project
|
||||
- Integration requirements with existing codebase validated with user
|
||||
- Key technical decisions based on real project constraints
|
||||
- Existing system compatibility requirements with specific verification steps
|
||||
- Clear sequencing of implementation to minimize risk to existing functionality
|
||||
@@ -1,266 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Brownfield Enhancement PRD
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/prd.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: IMPORTANT - SCOPE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive planning and multiple stories. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Assess Enhancement Complexity**: If this is a simple feature addition or bug fix that could be completed in 1-2 focused development sessions, STOP and recommend: "For simpler changes, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead. This full PRD process is designed for substantial enhancements that require architectural planning and multiple coordinated stories."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Project Context**: Determine if we're working in an IDE with the project already loaded or if the user needs to provide project information. If project files are available, analyze existing documentation in the docs folder. If insufficient documentation exists, recommend running the document-project task first.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Deep Assessment Requirement**: You MUST thoroughly analyze the existing project structure, patterns, and constraints before making ANY suggestions. Every recommendation must be grounded in actual project analysis, not assumptions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Intro Project Analysis and Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Gather comprehensive information about the existing project. This section must be completed before proceeding with requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Throughout this analysis, explicitly confirm your understanding with the user. For every assumption you make about the existing project, ask: "Based on my analysis, I understand that [assumption]. Is this correct?"
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed with any recommendations until the user has validated your understanding of the existing system.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check if document-project analysis was already performed. If yes, reference that output instead of re-analyzing.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Source**: [[LLM: Indicate one of the following:
|
||||
- Document-project output available at: {{path}}
|
||||
- IDE-based fresh analysis
|
||||
- User-provided information
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Project State**: [[LLM:
|
||||
- If document-project output exists: Extract summary from "High Level Architecture" and "Technical Summary" sections
|
||||
- Otherwise: Brief description of what the project currently does and its primary purpose
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Documentation Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project was run:
|
||||
- Note: "Document-project analysis available - using existing technical documentation"
|
||||
- List key documents created by document-project
|
||||
- Skip the missing documentation check below
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, check for existing documentation:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Available Documentation**:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Tech Stack Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Source Tree/Architecture [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Coding Standards [[LLM: If from document-project, may be partial]]
|
||||
- [ ] API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] External API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] UX/UI Guidelines [[LLM: May not be in document-project]]
|
||||
- [ ] Technical Debt Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Other: \***\*\_\_\_\*\***
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
- If document-project was already run: "Using existing project analysis from document-project output."
|
||||
- If critical documentation is missing and no document-project: "I recommend running the document-project task first..."
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Scope Definition
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with user to clearly define what type of enhancement this is. This is critical for scoping and approach.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Type**: [[LLM: Determine with user which applies]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] New Feature Addition
|
||||
- [ ] Major Feature Modification
|
||||
- [ ] Integration with New Systems
|
||||
- [ ] Performance/Scalability Improvements
|
||||
- [ ] UI/UX Overhaul
|
||||
- [ ] Technology Stack Upgrade
|
||||
- [ ] Bug Fix and Stability Improvements
|
||||
- [ ] Other: \***\*\_\_\_\*\***
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Description**: [[LLM: 2-3 sentences describing what the user wants to add or change]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact Assessment**: [[LLM: Assess the scope of impact on existing codebase]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Minimal Impact (isolated additions)
|
||||
- [ ] Moderate Impact (some existing code changes)
|
||||
- [ ] Significant Impact (substantial existing code changes)
|
||||
- [ ] Major Impact (architectural changes required)
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals and Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
#### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Bullet list of 1-line desired outcomes this enhancement will deliver if successful]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: 1-2 short paragraphs explaining why this enhancement is needed, what problem it solves, and how it fits with the existing project]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Change | Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| ------ | ---- | ------- | ----------- | ------ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Draft functional and non-functional requirements based on your validated understanding of the existing project. Before presenting requirements, confirm: "These requirements are based on my understanding of your existing system. Please review carefully and confirm they align with your project's reality." Then immediately execute tasks#advanced-elicitation display]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with FR]]
|
||||
@{example: - FR1: The existing Todo List will integrate with the new AI duplicate detection service without breaking current functionality.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Non Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with NFR. Include constraints from existing system]]
|
||||
@{example: - NFR1: Enhancement must maintain existing performance characteristics and not exceed current memory usage by more than 20%.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Critical for brownfield - what must remain compatible]]
|
||||
|
||||
- CR1: [[LLM: Existing API compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
- CR2: [[LLM: Database schema compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
- CR3: [[LLM: UI/UX consistency requirements]]
|
||||
- CR4: [[LLM: Integration compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## User Interface Enhancement Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For UI changes, capture how they will integrate with existing UI patterns and design systems]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Existing UI
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe how new UI elements will fit with existing design patterns, style guides, and component libraries]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Modified/New Screens and Views
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List only the screens/views that will be modified or added]]
|
||||
|
||||
### UI Consistency Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Specific requirements for maintaining visual and interaction consistency with existing application]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Constraints and Integration Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section replaces separate architecture documentation. Gather detailed technical constraints from existing project analysis.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Extract from "Actual Tech Stack" table in High Level Architecture section
|
||||
- Include version numbers and any noted constraints
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, document the current technology stack:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Languages**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Frameworks**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Database**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Infrastructure**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**External Dependencies**: [[LLM: From document-project "External Services" section or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will integrate with existing architecture]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Database Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new features will interact with existing database]]
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new APIs will integrate with existing API structure]]
|
||||
**Frontend Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new UI components will integrate with existing frontend]]
|
||||
**Testing Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new tests will integrate with existing test suite]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Organization and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on existing project analysis, define how new code will fit existing patterns]]
|
||||
|
||||
**File Structure Approach**: [[LLM: How new files will fit existing project structure]]
|
||||
**Naming Conventions**: [[LLM: Existing naming conventions that must be followed]]
|
||||
**Coding Standards**: [[LLM: Existing coding standards and linting rules]]
|
||||
**Documentation Standards**: [[LLM: How new code documentation will match existing patterns]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment and Operations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: How the enhancement fits existing deployment pipeline]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Build Process Integration**: [[LLM: How enhancement builds with existing process]]
|
||||
**Deployment Strategy**: [[LLM: How enhancement will be deployed alongside existing features]]
|
||||
**Monitoring and Logging**: [[LLM: How enhancement will integrate with existing monitoring]]
|
||||
**Configuration Management**: [[LLM: How new configuration will integrate with existing config]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Reference "Technical Debt and Known Issues" section
|
||||
- Include "Workarounds and Gotchas" that might impact enhancement
|
||||
- Note any identified constraints from "Critical Technical Debt"
|
||||
|
||||
Build risk assessment incorporating existing known issues:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Risks**: [[LLM: Include risks from document-project + new enhancement risks]]
|
||||
**Integration Risks**: [[LLM: Reference integration constraints from document-project]]
|
||||
**Deployment Risks**: [[LLM: Include deployment gotchas from document-project]]
|
||||
**Mitigation Strategies**: [[LLM: Address both existing and new risks]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic and Story Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For brownfield projects, favor a single comprehensive epic unless the user is clearly requesting multiple unrelated enhancements. Before presenting the epic structure, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing project, I believe this enhancement should be structured as [single epic/multiple epics] because [rationale based on actual project analysis]. Does this align with your understanding of the work required?" Then present the epic structure and immediately execute tasks#advanced-elicitation display.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Epic Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Explain the rationale for epic structure - typically single epic for brownfield unless multiple unrelated features]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Epic Structure Decision**: [[LLM: Single Epic or Multiple Epics with rationale]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic 1: {{enhancement_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Comprehensive epic that delivers the brownfield enhancement while maintaining existing functionality]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Epic Goal**: [[LLM: 2-3 sentences describing the complete enhancement objective and value]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Requirements**: [[LLM: Key integration points with existing system]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Stories must ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
- Each story should include verification that existing features still work
|
||||
- Stories should be sequenced to minimize risk to existing system
|
||||
- Include rollback considerations for each story
|
||||
- Focus on incremental integration rather than big-bang changes
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution in existing codebase context
|
||||
- MANDATORY: Present the complete story sequence and ask: "This story sequence is designed to minimize risk to your existing system. Does this order make sense given your project's architecture and constraints?"
|
||||
- Stories must be logically sequential with clear dependencies identified
|
||||
- Each story must deliver value while maintaining system integrity]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: story>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Story 1.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define criteria that include both new functionality and existing system integrity]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: criteria>>
|
||||
|
||||
- {{criterion number}}: {{criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Verification
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Specific verification steps to ensure existing functionality remains intact]]
|
||||
|
||||
- IV1: [[LLM: Existing functionality verification requirement]]
|
||||
- IV2: [[LLM: Integration point verification requirement]]
|
||||
- IV3: [[LLM: Performance impact verification requirement]]
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
280
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
280
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brownfield-prd-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brownfield Enhancement PRD
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/prd.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Brownfield Enhancement PRD"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-analysis
|
||||
title: Intro Project Analysis and Context
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
IMPORTANT - SCOPE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive planning and multiple stories. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Assess Enhancement Complexity**: If this is a simple feature addition or bug fix that could be completed in 1-2 focused development sessions, STOP and recommend: "For simpler changes, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead. This full PRD process is designed for substantial enhancements that require architectural planning and multiple coordinated stories."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Project Context**: Determine if we're working in an IDE with the project already loaded or if the user needs to provide project information. If project files are available, analyze existing documentation in the docs folder. If insufficient documentation exists, recommend running the document-project task first.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Deep Assessment Requirement**: You MUST thoroughly analyze the existing project structure, patterns, and constraints before making ANY suggestions. Every recommendation must be grounded in actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
Gather comprehensive information about the existing project. This section must be completed before proceeding with requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Throughout this analysis, explicitly confirm your understanding with the user. For every assumption you make about the existing project, ask: "Based on my analysis, I understand that [assumption]. Is this correct?"
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed with any recommendations until the user has validated your understanding of the existing system.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-project-overview
|
||||
title: Existing Project Overview
|
||||
instruction: Check if document-project analysis was already performed. If yes, reference that output instead of re-analyzing.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: analysis-source
|
||||
title: Analysis Source
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Indicate one of the following:
|
||||
- Document-project output available at: {{path}}
|
||||
- IDE-based fresh analysis
|
||||
- User-provided information
|
||||
- id: current-state
|
||||
title: Current Project State
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
- If document-project output exists: Extract summary from "High Level Architecture" and "Technical Summary" sections
|
||||
- Otherwise: Brief description of what the project currently does and its primary purpose
|
||||
- id: documentation-analysis
|
||||
title: Available Documentation Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project was run:
|
||||
- Note: "Document-project analysis available - using existing technical documentation"
|
||||
- List key documents created by document-project
|
||||
- Skip the missing documentation check below
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, check for existing documentation:
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: available-docs
|
||||
title: Available Documentation
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- Tech Stack Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- Source Tree/Architecture [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- Coding Standards [[LLM: If from document-project, may be partial]]
|
||||
- API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- External API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- UX/UI Guidelines [[LLM: May not be in document-project]]
|
||||
- Technical Debt Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- "Other: {{other_docs}}"
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
- If document-project was already run: "Using existing project analysis from document-project output."
|
||||
- If critical documentation is missing and no document-project: "I recommend running the document-project task first..."
|
||||
- id: enhancement-scope
|
||||
title: Enhancement Scope Definition
|
||||
instruction: Work with user to clearly define what type of enhancement this is. This is critical for scoping and approach.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: enhancement-type
|
||||
title: Enhancement Type
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
instruction: Determine with user which applies
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- New Feature Addition
|
||||
- Major Feature Modification
|
||||
- Integration with New Systems
|
||||
- Performance/Scalability Improvements
|
||||
- UI/UX Overhaul
|
||||
- Technology Stack Upgrade
|
||||
- Bug Fix and Stability Improvements
|
||||
- "Other: {{other_type}}"
|
||||
- id: enhancement-description
|
||||
title: Enhancement Description
|
||||
instruction: 2-3 sentences describing what the user wants to add or change
|
||||
- id: impact-assessment
|
||||
title: Impact Assessment
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
instruction: Assess the scope of impact on existing codebase
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- Minimal Impact (isolated additions)
|
||||
- Moderate Impact (some existing code changes)
|
||||
- Significant Impact (substantial existing code changes)
|
||||
- Major Impact (architectural changes required)
|
||||
- id: goals-context
|
||||
title: Goals and Background Context
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: goals
|
||||
title: Goals
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
instruction: Bullet list of 1-line desired outcomes this enhancement will deliver if successful
|
||||
- id: background
|
||||
title: Background Context
|
||||
type: paragraphs
|
||||
instruction: 1-2 short paragraphs explaining why this enhancement is needed, what problem it solves, and how it fits with the existing project
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Change, Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: requirements
|
||||
title: Requirements
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Draft functional and non-functional requirements based on your validated understanding of the existing project. Before presenting requirements, confirm: "These requirements are based on my understanding of your existing system. Please review carefully and confirm they align with your project's reality."
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: functional
|
||||
title: Functional
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: FR
|
||||
instruction: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with FR
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "FR1: The existing Todo List will integrate with the new AI duplicate detection service without breaking current functionality."
|
||||
- id: non-functional
|
||||
title: Non Functional
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: NFR
|
||||
instruction: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with NFR. Include constraints from existing system
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "NFR1: Enhancement must maintain existing performance characteristics and not exceed current memory usage by more than 20%."
|
||||
- id: compatibility
|
||||
title: Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Critical for brownfield - what must remain compatible
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: CR
|
||||
template: "{{requirement}}: {{description}}"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- id: cr1
|
||||
template: "CR1: {{existing_api_compatibility}}"
|
||||
- id: cr2
|
||||
template: "CR2: {{database_schema_compatibility}}"
|
||||
- id: cr3
|
||||
template: "CR3: {{ui_ux_consistency}}"
|
||||
- id: cr4
|
||||
template: "CR4: {{integration_compatibility}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: ui-enhancement-goals
|
||||
title: User Interface Enhancement Goals
|
||||
condition: Enhancement includes UI changes
|
||||
instruction: For UI changes, capture how they will integrate with existing UI patterns and design systems
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-ui-integration
|
||||
title: Integration with Existing UI
|
||||
instruction: Describe how new UI elements will fit with existing design patterns, style guides, and component libraries
|
||||
- id: modified-screens
|
||||
title: Modified/New Screens and Views
|
||||
instruction: List only the screens/views that will be modified or added
|
||||
- id: ui-consistency
|
||||
title: UI Consistency Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Specific requirements for maintaining visual and interaction consistency with existing application
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technical-constraints
|
||||
title: Technical Constraints and Integration Requirements
|
||||
instruction: This section replaces separate architecture documentation. Gather detailed technical constraints from existing project analysis.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-tech-stack
|
||||
title: Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Extract from "Actual Tech Stack" table in High Level Architecture section
|
||||
- Include version numbers and any noted constraints
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, document the current technology stack:
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Languages**: {{languages}}
|
||||
**Frameworks**: {{frameworks}}
|
||||
**Database**: {{database}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure**: {{infrastructure}}
|
||||
**External Dependencies**: {{external_dependencies}}
|
||||
- id: integration-approach
|
||||
title: Integration Approach
|
||||
instruction: Define how the enhancement will integrate with existing architecture
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Database Integration Strategy**: {{database_integration}}
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy**: {{api_integration}}
|
||||
**Frontend Integration Strategy**: {{frontend_integration}}
|
||||
**Testing Integration Strategy**: {{testing_integration}}
|
||||
- id: code-organization
|
||||
title: Code Organization and Standards
|
||||
instruction: Based on existing project analysis, define how new code will fit existing patterns
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**File Structure Approach**: {{file_structure}}
|
||||
**Naming Conventions**: {{naming_conventions}}
|
||||
**Coding Standards**: {{coding_standards}}
|
||||
**Documentation Standards**: {{documentation_standards}}
|
||||
- id: deployment-operations
|
||||
title: Deployment and Operations
|
||||
instruction: How the enhancement fits existing deployment pipeline
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Build Process Integration**: {{build_integration}}
|
||||
**Deployment Strategy**: {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
**Monitoring and Logging**: {{monitoring_logging}}
|
||||
**Configuration Management**: {{config_management}}
|
||||
- id: risk-assessment
|
||||
title: Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Reference "Technical Debt and Known Issues" section
|
||||
- Include "Workarounds and Gotchas" that might impact enhancement
|
||||
- Note any identified constraints from "Critical Technical Debt"
|
||||
|
||||
Build risk assessment incorporating existing known issues:
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Technical Risks**: {{technical_risks}}
|
||||
**Integration Risks**: {{integration_risks}}
|
||||
**Deployment Risks**: {{deployment_risks}}
|
||||
**Mitigation Strategies**: {{mitigation_strategies}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: epic-structure
|
||||
title: Epic and Story Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For brownfield projects, favor a single comprehensive epic unless the user is clearly requesting multiple unrelated enhancements. Before presenting the epic structure, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing project, I believe this enhancement should be structured as [single epic/multiple epics] because [rationale based on actual project analysis]. Does this align with your understanding of the work required?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: epic-approach
|
||||
title: Epic Approach
|
||||
instruction: Explain the rationale for epic structure - typically single epic for brownfield unless multiple unrelated features
|
||||
template: "**Epic Structure Decision**: {{epic_decision}} with rationale"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: epic-details
|
||||
title: "Epic 1: {{enhancement_title}}"
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Comprehensive epic that delivers the brownfield enhancement while maintaining existing functionality
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
- Stories must ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
- Each story should include verification that existing features still work
|
||||
- Stories should be sequenced to minimize risk to existing system
|
||||
- Include rollback considerations for each story
|
||||
- Focus on incremental integration rather than big-bang changes
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution in existing codebase context
|
||||
- MANDATORY: Present the complete story sequence and ask: "This story sequence is designed to minimize risk to your existing system. Does this order make sense given your project's architecture and constraints?"
|
||||
- Stories must be logically sequential with clear dependencies identified
|
||||
- Each story must deliver value while maintaining system integrity
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Epic Goal**: {{epic_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Requirements**: {{integration_requirements}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: story
|
||||
title: "Story 1.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: acceptance-criteria
|
||||
title: Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
instruction: Define criteria that include both new functionality and existing system integrity
|
||||
item_template: "{{criterion_number}}: {{criteria}}"
|
||||
- id: integration-verification
|
||||
title: Integration Verification
|
||||
instruction: Specific verification steps to ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: IV
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- template: "IV1: {{existing_functionality_verification}}"
|
||||
- template: "IV2: {{integration_point_verification}}"
|
||||
- template: "IV3: {{performance_impact_verification}}"
|
||||
@@ -1,291 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Competitive Analysis Report: {{Project/Product Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/competitor-analysis.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides comprehensive competitor analysis. Start by understanding the user's competitive intelligence needs and strategic objectives. Help them identify and prioritize competitors before diving into detailed analysis.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{Provide high-level competitive insights, main threats and opportunities, and recommended strategic actions. Write this section LAST after completing all analysis.}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Analysis Scope & Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the primary purpose:
|
||||
|
||||
- New market entry assessment
|
||||
- Product positioning strategy
|
||||
- Feature gap analysis
|
||||
- Pricing strategy development
|
||||
- Partnership/acquisition targets
|
||||
- Competitive threat assessment}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitor Categories Analyzed
|
||||
|
||||
{{List categories included:
|
||||
|
||||
- Direct Competitors: Same product/service, same target market
|
||||
- Indirect Competitors: Different product, same need/problem
|
||||
- Potential Competitors: Could enter market easily
|
||||
- Substitute Products: Alternative solutions
|
||||
- Aspirational Competitors: Best-in-class examples}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe approach:
|
||||
|
||||
- Information sources used
|
||||
- Analysis timeframe
|
||||
- Confidence levels
|
||||
- Limitations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Structure
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the competitive environment:
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of active competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration (fragmented/consolidated)
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Recent market entries/exits}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitor Prioritization Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Help categorize competitors by market share and strategic threat level]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Create a 2x2 matrix:
|
||||
|
||||
- Priority 1 (Core Competitors): High Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 2 (Emerging Threats): Low Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 3 (Established Players): High Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
- Priority 4 (Monitor Only): Low Market Share + Low Threat}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Individual Competitor Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create detailed profiles for each Priority 1 and Priority 2 competitor. For Priority 3 and 4, create condensed profiles.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### {{Competitor Name}} - Priority {{1/2/3/4}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Company Overview
|
||||
|
||||
- **Founded:** {{Year, founders}}
|
||||
- **Headquarters:** {{Location}}
|
||||
- **Company Size:** {{Employees, revenue if known}}
|
||||
- **Funding:** {{Total raised, key investors}}
|
||||
- **Leadership:** {{Key executives}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Business Model & Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Revenue Model:** {{How they make money}}
|
||||
- **Target Market:** {{Primary customer segments}}
|
||||
- **Value Proposition:** {{Core value promise}}
|
||||
- **Go-to-Market Strategy:** {{Sales and marketing approach}}
|
||||
- **Strategic Focus:** {{Current priorities}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Product/Service Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
- **Core Offerings:** {{Main products/services}}
|
||||
- **Key Features:** {{Standout capabilities}}
|
||||
- **User Experience:** {{UX strengths/weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Technology Stack:** {{If relevant/known}}
|
||||
- **Pricing:** {{Model and price points}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strengths & Weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Strength 1}}
|
||||
- {{Strength 2}}
|
||||
- {{Strength 3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Weaknesses:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Weakness 1}}
|
||||
- {{Weakness 2}}
|
||||
- {{Weakness 3}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Market Position & Performance
|
||||
|
||||
- **Market Share:** {{Estimate if available}}
|
||||
- **Customer Base:** {{Size, notable clients}}
|
||||
- **Growth Trajectory:** {{Trending up/down/stable}}
|
||||
- **Recent Developments:** {{Key news, releases}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for each priority competitor>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparative Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a detailed comparison table of key features across competitors]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature Category | {{Your Company}} | {{Competitor 1}} | {{Competitor 2}} | {{Competitor 3}} |
|
||||
| --------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
|
||||
| **Core Functionality** |
|
||||
| Feature A | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} |
|
||||
| Feature B | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} |
|
||||
| **User Experience** |
|
||||
| Mobile App | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} |
|
||||
| Onboarding Time | {{Time}} | {{Time}} | {{Time}} | {{Time}} |
|
||||
| **Integration & Ecosystem** |
|
||||
| API Availability | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} |
|
||||
| Third-party Integrations | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} |
|
||||
| **Pricing & Plans** |
|
||||
| Starting Price | {{$X}} | {{$X}} | {{$X}} | {{$X}} |
|
||||
| Free Tier | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### SWOT Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create SWOT analysis for your solution vs. top competitors]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Your Solution
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strengths:** {{List key strengths}}
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** {{List key weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Opportunities:** {{List opportunities}}
|
||||
- **Threats:** {{List threats}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### vs. {{Main Competitor}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Competitive Advantages:** {{Where you're stronger}}
|
||||
- **Competitive Disadvantages:** {{Where they're stronger}}
|
||||
- **Differentiation Opportunities:** {{How to stand out}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning Map
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe competitor positions on key dimensions]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Create a positioning description using 2 key dimensions relevant to the market, such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- Price vs. Features
|
||||
- Ease of Use vs. Power
|
||||
- Specialization vs. Breadth
|
||||
- Self-Serve vs. High-Touch}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Advantages Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
#### Sustainable Advantages
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify moats and defensible positions:
|
||||
|
||||
- Network effects
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
- Brand strength
|
||||
- Technology barriers
|
||||
- Regulatory advantages}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Vulnerable Points
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where competitors could be challenged:
|
||||
|
||||
- Weak customer segments
|
||||
- Missing features
|
||||
- Poor user experience
|
||||
- High prices
|
||||
- Limited geographic presence}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Blue Ocean Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify uncontested market spaces]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{List opportunities to create new market space:
|
||||
|
||||
- Underserved segments
|
||||
- Unaddressed use cases
|
||||
- New business models
|
||||
- Geographic expansion
|
||||
- Different value propositions}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Differentiation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to position against competitors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Unique value propositions to emphasize
|
||||
- Features to prioritize
|
||||
- Segments to target
|
||||
- Messaging and positioning}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Response Planning
|
||||
|
||||
#### Offensive Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to gain market share:
|
||||
|
||||
- Target competitor weaknesses
|
||||
- Win competitive deals
|
||||
- Capture their customers}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Defensive Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to protect your position:
|
||||
|
||||
- Strengthen vulnerable areas
|
||||
- Build switching costs
|
||||
- Deepen customer relationships}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Partnership & Ecosystem Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Potential collaboration opportunities:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complementary players
|
||||
- Channel partners
|
||||
- Technology integrations
|
||||
- Strategic alliances}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring & Intelligence Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Competitors to Track
|
||||
|
||||
{{Priority list with rationale}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Monitoring Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
{{What to track:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product updates
|
||||
- Pricing changes
|
||||
- Customer wins/losses
|
||||
- Funding/M&A activity
|
||||
- Market messaging}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Intelligence Sources
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where to gather ongoing intelligence:
|
||||
|
||||
- Company websites/blogs
|
||||
- Customer reviews
|
||||
- Industry reports
|
||||
- Social media
|
||||
- Patent filings}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Update Cadence
|
||||
|
||||
{{Recommended review schedule:
|
||||
|
||||
- Weekly: {{What to check}}
|
||||
- Monthly: {{What to review}}
|
||||
- Quarterly: {{Deep analysis}}}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the document, offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for competitive analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Analysis Elicitation Actions** 0. Deep dive on a specific competitor's strategy
|
||||
|
||||
1. Analyze competitive dynamics in a specific segment
|
||||
2. War game competitive responses to your moves
|
||||
3. Explore partnership vs. competition scenarios
|
||||
4. Stress test differentiation claims
|
||||
5. Analyze disruption potential (yours or theirs)
|
||||
6. Compare to competition in adjacent markets
|
||||
7. Generate win/loss analysis insights
|
||||
8. If only we had known about [competitor X's plan]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on competitive analysis documents.]]
|
||||
293
bmad-core/templates/competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
293
bmad-core/templates/competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: competitor-analysis-template-v2
|
||||
name: Competitive Analysis Report
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/competitor-analysis.md
|
||||
title: "Competitive Analysis Report: {{project_product_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Competitive Analysis Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Deep dive on a specific competitor's strategy"
|
||||
- "Analyze competitive dynamics in a specific segment"
|
||||
- "War game competitive responses to your moves"
|
||||
- "Explore partnership vs. competition scenarios"
|
||||
- "Stress test differentiation claims"
|
||||
- "Analyze disruption potential (yours or theirs)"
|
||||
- "Compare to competition in adjacent markets"
|
||||
- "Generate win/loss analysis insights"
|
||||
- "If only we had known about [competitor X's plan]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: Provide high-level competitive insights, main threats and opportunities, and recommended strategic actions. Write this section LAST after completing all analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: analysis-scope
|
||||
title: Analysis Scope & Methodology
|
||||
instruction: This template guides comprehensive competitor analysis. Start by understanding the user's competitive intelligence needs and strategic objectives. Help them identify and prioritize competitors before diving into detailed analysis.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: analysis-purpose
|
||||
title: Analysis Purpose
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the primary purpose:
|
||||
- New market entry assessment
|
||||
- Product positioning strategy
|
||||
- Feature gap analysis
|
||||
- Pricing strategy development
|
||||
- Partnership/acquisition targets
|
||||
- Competitive threat assessment
|
||||
- id: competitor-categories
|
||||
title: Competitor Categories Analyzed
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List categories included:
|
||||
- Direct Competitors: Same product/service, same target market
|
||||
- Indirect Competitors: Different product, same need/problem
|
||||
- Potential Competitors: Could enter market easily
|
||||
- Substitute Products: Alternative solutions
|
||||
- Aspirational Competitors: Best-in-class examples
|
||||
- id: research-methodology
|
||||
title: Research Methodology
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe approach:
|
||||
- Information sources used
|
||||
- Analysis timeframe
|
||||
- Confidence levels
|
||||
- Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitive-landscape
|
||||
title: Competitive Landscape Overview
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-structure
|
||||
title: Market Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the competitive environment:
|
||||
- Number of active competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration (fragmented/consolidated)
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Recent market entries/exits
|
||||
- id: prioritization-matrix
|
||||
title: Competitor Prioritization Matrix
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Help categorize competitors by market share and strategic threat level
|
||||
|
||||
Create a 2x2 matrix:
|
||||
- Priority 1 (Core Competitors): High Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 2 (Emerging Threats): Low Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 3 (Established Players): High Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
- Priority 4 (Monitor Only): Low Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitor-profiles
|
||||
title: Individual Competitor Profiles
|
||||
instruction: Create detailed profiles for each Priority 1 and Priority 2 competitor. For Priority 3 and 4, create condensed profiles.
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: competitor
|
||||
title: "{{competitor_name}} - Priority {{priority_level}}"
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: company-overview
|
||||
title: Company Overview
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Founded:** {{year_founders}}
|
||||
- **Headquarters:** {{location}}
|
||||
- **Company Size:** {{employees_revenue}}
|
||||
- **Funding:** {{total_raised_investors}}
|
||||
- **Leadership:** {{key_executives}}
|
||||
- id: business-model
|
||||
title: Business Model & Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Revenue Model:** {{revenue_model}}
|
||||
- **Target Market:** {{customer_segments}}
|
||||
- **Value Proposition:** {{value_promise}}
|
||||
- **Go-to-Market Strategy:** {{gtm_approach}}
|
||||
- **Strategic Focus:** {{current_priorities}}
|
||||
- id: product-analysis
|
||||
title: Product/Service Analysis
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Core Offerings:** {{main_products}}
|
||||
- **Key Features:** {{standout_capabilities}}
|
||||
- **User Experience:** {{ux_assessment}}
|
||||
- **Technology Stack:** {{tech_stack}}
|
||||
- **Pricing:** {{pricing_model}}
|
||||
- id: strengths-weaknesses
|
||||
title: Strengths & Weaknesses
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: strengths
|
||||
title: Strengths
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{strength}}"
|
||||
- id: weaknesses
|
||||
title: Weaknesses
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{weakness}}"
|
||||
- id: market-position
|
||||
title: Market Position & Performance
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Market Share:** {{market_share_estimate}}
|
||||
- **Customer Base:** {{customer_size_notables}}
|
||||
- **Growth Trajectory:** {{growth_trend}}
|
||||
- **Recent Developments:** {{key_news}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: comparative-analysis
|
||||
title: Comparative Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: feature-comparison
|
||||
title: Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||||
instruction: Create a detailed comparison table of key features across competitors
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Feature Category", "{{your_company}}", "{{competitor_1}}", "{{competitor_2}}", "{{competitor_3}}"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- category: "Core Functionality"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Feature A", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}"]
|
||||
- ["Feature B", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}"]
|
||||
- category: "User Experience"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Mobile App", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}"]
|
||||
- ["Onboarding Time", "{{time}}", "{{time}}", "{{time}}", "{{time}}"]
|
||||
- category: "Integration & Ecosystem"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["API Availability", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}"]
|
||||
- ["Third-party Integrations", "{{number}}", "{{number}}", "{{number}}", "{{number}}"]
|
||||
- category: "Pricing & Plans"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Starting Price", "{{price}}", "{{price}}", "{{price}}", "{{price}}"]
|
||||
- ["Free Tier", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}"]
|
||||
- id: swot-comparison
|
||||
title: SWOT Comparison
|
||||
instruction: Create SWOT analysis for your solution vs. top competitors
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: your-solution
|
||||
title: Your Solution
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strengths:** {{strengths}}
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** {{weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Opportunities:** {{opportunities}}
|
||||
- **Threats:** {{threats}}
|
||||
- id: vs-competitor
|
||||
title: "vs. {{main_competitor}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Competitive Advantages:** {{your_advantages}}
|
||||
- **Competitive Disadvantages:** {{their_advantages}}
|
||||
- **Differentiation Opportunities:** {{differentiation}}
|
||||
- id: positioning-map
|
||||
title: Positioning Map
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe competitor positions on key dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
Create a positioning description using 2 key dimensions relevant to the market, such as:
|
||||
- Price vs. Features
|
||||
- Ease of Use vs. Power
|
||||
- Specialization vs. Breadth
|
||||
- Self-Serve vs. High-Touch
|
||||
|
||||
- id: strategic-analysis
|
||||
title: Strategic Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: competitive-advantages
|
||||
title: Competitive Advantages Assessment
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: sustainable-advantages
|
||||
title: Sustainable Advantages
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify moats and defensible positions:
|
||||
- Network effects
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
- Brand strength
|
||||
- Technology barriers
|
||||
- Regulatory advantages
|
||||
- id: vulnerable-points
|
||||
title: Vulnerable Points
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Where competitors could be challenged:
|
||||
- Weak customer segments
|
||||
- Missing features
|
||||
- Poor user experience
|
||||
- High prices
|
||||
- Limited geographic presence
|
||||
- id: blue-ocean
|
||||
title: Blue Ocean Opportunities
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify uncontested market spaces
|
||||
|
||||
List opportunities to create new market space:
|
||||
- Underserved segments
|
||||
- Unaddressed use cases
|
||||
- New business models
|
||||
- Geographic expansion
|
||||
- Different value propositions
|
||||
|
||||
- id: strategic-recommendations
|
||||
title: Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: differentiation-strategy
|
||||
title: Differentiation Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to position against competitors:
|
||||
- Unique value propositions to emphasize
|
||||
- Features to prioritize
|
||||
- Segments to target
|
||||
- Messaging and positioning
|
||||
- id: competitive-response
|
||||
title: Competitive Response Planning
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: offensive-strategies
|
||||
title: Offensive Strategies
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to gain market share:
|
||||
- Target competitor weaknesses
|
||||
- Win competitive deals
|
||||
- Capture their customers
|
||||
- id: defensive-strategies
|
||||
title: Defensive Strategies
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to protect your position:
|
||||
- Strengthen vulnerable areas
|
||||
- Build switching costs
|
||||
- Deepen customer relationships
|
||||
- id: partnership-ecosystem
|
||||
title: Partnership & Ecosystem Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Potential collaboration opportunities:
|
||||
- Complementary players
|
||||
- Channel partners
|
||||
- Technology integrations
|
||||
- Strategic alliances
|
||||
|
||||
- id: monitoring-plan
|
||||
title: Monitoring & Intelligence Plan
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-competitors
|
||||
title: Key Competitors to Track
|
||||
instruction: Priority list with rationale
|
||||
- id: monitoring-metrics
|
||||
title: Monitoring Metrics
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
What to track:
|
||||
- Product updates
|
||||
- Pricing changes
|
||||
- Customer wins/losses
|
||||
- Funding/M&A activity
|
||||
- Market messaging
|
||||
- id: intelligence-sources
|
||||
title: Intelligence Sources
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Where to gather ongoing intelligence:
|
||||
- Company websites/blogs
|
||||
- Customer reviews
|
||||
- Industry reports
|
||||
- Social media
|
||||
- Patent filings
|
||||
- id: update-cadence
|
||||
title: Update Cadence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Recommended review schedule:
|
||||
- Weekly: {{weekly_items}}
|
||||
- Monthly: {{monthly_items}}
|
||||
- Quarterly: {{quarterly_analysis}}
|
||||
@@ -1,175 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Frontend Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/ui-architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Review provided documents including PRD, UX-UI Specification, and main Architecture Document. Focus on extracting technical implementation details needed for AI frontend tools and developer agents. Ask the user for any of these documents if you are unable to locate and were not provided.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Template and Framework Selection
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before proceeding with frontend architecture design, check if the project is using a frontend starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD, main architecture document, and brainstorming brief for mentions of:
|
||||
|
||||
- Frontend starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vite, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- UI kit or component library starters
|
||||
- Existing frontend projects being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Admin dashboard templates or other specialized starters
|
||||
- Design system implementations
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a frontend starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-installed dependencies and versions
|
||||
- Folder structure and file organization
|
||||
- Built-in components and utilities
|
||||
- Styling approach (CSS modules, styled-components, Tailwind, etc.)
|
||||
- State management setup (if any)
|
||||
- Routing configuration
|
||||
- Testing setup and patterns
|
||||
- Build and development scripts
|
||||
|
||||
- Use this analysis to ensure your frontend architecture aligns with the starter's patterns
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no frontend starter is mentioned but this is a new UI, ensure we know what the ui language and framework is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Based on the framework choice, suggest appropriate starters:
|
||||
- React: Create React App, Next.js, Vite + React
|
||||
- Vue: Vue CLI, Nuxt.js, Vite + Vue
|
||||
- Angular: Angular CLI
|
||||
- Or suggest popular UI templates if applicable
|
||||
- Explain benefits specific to frontend development
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Note that all tooling, bundling, and configuration will need manual setup
|
||||
- Proceed with frontend architecture from scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Document the starter template decision and any constraints it imposes before proceeding.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Frontend Tech Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Extract from main architecture's Technology Stack Table. This section MUST remain synchronized with the main architecture document. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Stack Table
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale |
|
||||
| :-------------------- | :------------------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------- |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **UI Library** | {{ui_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **State Management** | {{state_management}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Routing** | {{routing_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Styling** | {{styling_solution}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Component Library** | {{component_lib}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Form Handling** | {{form_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Animation** | {{animation_lib}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Dev Tools** | {{dev_tools}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Fill in appropriate technology choices based on the selected framework and project requirements.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define exact directory structure for AI tools based on the chosen framework. Be specific about where each type of file goes. Generate a structure that follows the framework's best practices and conventions. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define exact patterns for component creation based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate a minimal but complete component template following the framework's best practices. Include TypeScript types, proper imports, and basic structure.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide naming conventions specific to the chosen framework for components, files, services, state management, and other architectural elements.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define state management patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Store Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate the state management directory structure appropriate for the chosen framework and selected state management solution.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### State Management Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a basic state management template/example following the framework's recommended patterns. Include TypeScript types and common operations like setting, updating, and clearing state.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## API Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define API service patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Service Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide an API service template that follows the framework's conventions. Include proper TypeScript types, error handling, and async patterns.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### API Client Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Show how to configure the HTTP client for the chosen framework, including authentication interceptors/middleware and error handling.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Routing
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define routing structure and patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Route Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide routing configuration appropriate for the chosen framework. Include protected route patterns, lazy loading where applicable, and authentication guards/middleware.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Styling Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define styling approach based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Styling Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe the styling methodology appropriate for the chosen framework (CSS Modules, Styled Components, Tailwind, etc.) and provide basic patterns.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Global Theme Variables
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a CSS custom properties (CSS variables) theme system that works across all frameworks. Include colors, spacing, typography, shadows, and dark mode support.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define minimal testing requirements based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Test Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a basic component test template using the framework's recommended testing library. Include examples of rendering tests, user interaction tests, and mocking.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unit Tests**: Test individual components in isolation
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests**: Test component interactions
|
||||
3. **E2E Tests**: Test critical user flows (using Cypress/Playwright)
|
||||
4. **Coverage Goals**: Aim for 80% code coverage
|
||||
5. **Test Structure**: Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
|
||||
6. **Mock External Dependencies**: API calls, routing, state management
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List required environment variables based on the chosen framework. Show the appropriate format and naming conventions for the framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Frontend Developer Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Coding Rules
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List essential rules that prevent common AI mistakes, including both universal rules and framework-specific ones. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a framework-specific cheat sheet with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Common commands (dev server, build, test)
|
||||
- Key import patterns
|
||||
- File naming conventions
|
||||
- Project-specific patterns and utilities]]
|
||||
206
bmad-core/templates/front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
206
bmad-core/templates/front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: frontend-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Frontend Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/ui-architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Frontend Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: template-framework-selection
|
||||
title: Template and Framework Selection
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Review provided documents including PRD, UX-UI Specification, and main Architecture Document. Focus on extracting technical implementation details needed for AI frontend tools and developer agents. Ask the user for any of these documents if you are unable to locate and were not provided.
|
||||
|
||||
Before proceeding with frontend architecture design, check if the project is using a frontend starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD, main architecture document, and brainstorming brief for mentions of:
|
||||
- Frontend starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vite, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- UI kit or component library starters
|
||||
- Existing frontend projects being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Admin dashboard templates or other specialized starters
|
||||
- Design system implementations
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a frontend starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-installed dependencies and versions
|
||||
- Folder structure and file organization
|
||||
- Built-in components and utilities
|
||||
- Styling approach (CSS modules, styled-components, Tailwind, etc.)
|
||||
- State management setup (if any)
|
||||
- Routing configuration
|
||||
- Testing setup and patterns
|
||||
- Build and development scripts
|
||||
- Use this analysis to ensure your frontend architecture aligns with the starter's patterns
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no frontend starter is mentioned but this is a new UI, ensure we know what the ui language and framework is:
|
||||
- Based on the framework choice, suggest appropriate starters:
|
||||
- React: Create React App, Next.js, Vite + React
|
||||
- Vue: Vue CLI, Nuxt.js, Vite + Vue
|
||||
- Angular: Angular CLI
|
||||
- Or suggest popular UI templates if applicable
|
||||
- Explain benefits specific to frontend development
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Note that all tooling, bundling, and configuration will need manual setup
|
||||
- Proceed with frontend architecture from scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Document the starter template decision and any constraints it imposes before proceeding.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-tech-stack
|
||||
title: Frontend Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: Extract from main architecture's Technology Stack Table. This section MUST remain synchronized with the main architecture document.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
instruction: Fill in appropriate technology choices based on the selected framework and project requirements.
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Framework", "{{framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["UI Library", "{{ui_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["State Management", "{{state_management}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Routing", "{{routing_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Build Tool", "{{build_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Styling", "{{styling_solution}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Testing", "{{test_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Component Library", "{{component_lib}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Form Handling", "{{form_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Animation", "{{animation_lib}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Dev Tools", "{{dev_tools}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: project-structure
|
||||
title: Project Structure
|
||||
instruction: Define exact directory structure for AI tools based on the chosen framework. Be specific about where each type of file goes. Generate a structure that follows the framework's best practices and conventions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-standards
|
||||
title: Component Standards
|
||||
instruction: Define exact patterns for component creation based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-template
|
||||
title: Component Template
|
||||
instruction: Generate a minimal but complete component template following the framework's best practices. Include TypeScript types, proper imports, and basic structure.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
instruction: Provide naming conventions specific to the chosen framework for components, files, services, state management, and other architectural elements.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: state-management
|
||||
title: State Management
|
||||
instruction: Define state management patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: store-structure
|
||||
title: Store Structure
|
||||
instruction: Generate the state management directory structure appropriate for the chosen framework and selected state management solution.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
- id: state-template
|
||||
title: State Management Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide a basic state management template/example following the framework's recommended patterns. Include TypeScript types and common operations like setting, updating, and clearing state.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-integration
|
||||
title: API Integration
|
||||
instruction: Define API service patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: service-template
|
||||
title: Service Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide an API service template that follows the framework's conventions. Include proper TypeScript types, error handling, and async patterns.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: api-client-config
|
||||
title: API Client Configuration
|
||||
instruction: Show how to configure the HTTP client for the chosen framework, including authentication interceptors/middleware and error handling.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: routing
|
||||
title: Routing
|
||||
instruction: Define routing structure and patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: route-configuration
|
||||
title: Route Configuration
|
||||
instruction: Provide routing configuration appropriate for the chosen framework. Include protected route patterns, lazy loading where applicable, and authentication guards/middleware.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: styling-guidelines
|
||||
title: Styling Guidelines
|
||||
instruction: Define styling approach based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: styling-approach
|
||||
title: Styling Approach
|
||||
instruction: Describe the styling methodology appropriate for the chosen framework (CSS Modules, Styled Components, Tailwind, etc.) and provide basic patterns.
|
||||
- id: global-theme
|
||||
title: Global Theme Variables
|
||||
instruction: Provide a CSS custom properties (CSS variables) theme system that works across all frameworks. Include colors, spacing, typography, shadows, and dark mode support.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: css
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-requirements
|
||||
title: Testing Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Define minimal testing requirements based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-test-template
|
||||
title: Component Test Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide a basic component test template using the framework's recommended testing library. Include examples of rendering tests, user interaction tests, and mocking.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: testing-best-practices
|
||||
title: Testing Best Practices
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- "**Unit Tests**: Test individual components in isolation"
|
||||
- "**Integration Tests**: Test component interactions"
|
||||
- "**E2E Tests**: Test critical user flows (using Cypress/Playwright)"
|
||||
- "**Coverage Goals**: Aim for 80% code coverage"
|
||||
- "**Test Structure**: Arrange-Act-Assert pattern"
|
||||
- "**Mock External Dependencies**: API calls, routing, state management"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: environment-configuration
|
||||
title: Environment Configuration
|
||||
instruction: List required environment variables based on the chosen framework. Show the appropriate format and naming conventions for the framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-developer-standards
|
||||
title: Frontend Developer Standards
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: critical-coding-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Coding Rules
|
||||
instruction: List essential rules that prevent common AI mistakes, including both universal rules and framework-specific ones.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
- id: quick-reference
|
||||
title: Quick Reference
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a framework-specific cheat sheet with:
|
||||
- Common commands (dev server, build, test)
|
||||
- Key import patterns
|
||||
- File naming conventions
|
||||
- Project-specific patterns and utilities
|
||||
@@ -1,413 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} UI/UX Specification
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/front-end-spec.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Review provided documents including Project Brief, PRD, and any user research to gather context. Focus on understanding user needs, pain points, and desired outcomes before beginning the specification.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Establish the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the user experience goals, information architecture, user flows, and visual design specifications for {{Project Name}}'s user interface. It serves as the foundation for visual design and frontend development, ensuring a cohesive and user-centered experience.
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall UX Goals & Principles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with the user to establish and document the following. If not already defined, facilitate a discussion to determine:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Target User Personas - elicit details or confirm existing ones from PRD
|
||||
2. Key Usability Goals - understand what success looks like for users
|
||||
3. Core Design Principles - establish 3-5 guiding principles
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Target User Personas
|
||||
|
||||
{{persona_descriptions}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: personas}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power User:** Technical professionals who need advanced features and efficiency
|
||||
- **Casual User:** Occasional users who prioritize ease of use and clear guidance
|
||||
- **Administrator:** System managers who need control and oversight capabilities
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability Goals
|
||||
|
||||
{{usability_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: usability_goals}
|
||||
|
||||
- Ease of learning: New users can complete core tasks within 5 minutes
|
||||
- Efficiency of use: Power users can complete frequent tasks with minimal clicks
|
||||
- Error prevention: Clear validation and confirmation for destructive actions
|
||||
- Memorability: Infrequent users can return without relearning
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
{{design_principles}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: design_principles}
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Clarity over cleverness** - Prioritize clear communication over aesthetic innovation
|
||||
2. **Progressive disclosure** - Show only what's needed, when it's needed
|
||||
3. **Consistent patterns** - Use familiar UI patterns throughout the application
|
||||
4. **Immediate feedback** - Every action should have a clear, immediate response
|
||||
5. **Accessible by default** - Design for all users from the start
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Information Architecture (IA)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Collaborate with the user to create a comprehensive information architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Build a Site Map or Screen Inventory showing all major areas
|
||||
2. Define the Navigation Structure (primary, secondary, breadcrumbs)
|
||||
3. Use Mermaid diagrams for visual representation
|
||||
4. Consider user mental models and expected groupings
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Site Map / Screen Inventory
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{sitemap_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: sitemap}
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Homepage] --> B[Dashboard]
|
||||
A --> C[Products]
|
||||
A --> D[Account]
|
||||
B --> B1[Analytics]
|
||||
B --> B2[Recent Activity]
|
||||
C --> C1[Browse]
|
||||
C --> C2[Search]
|
||||
C --> C3[Product Details]
|
||||
D --> D1[Profile]
|
||||
D --> D2[Settings]
|
||||
D --> D3[Billing]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Navigation Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Navigation:** {{primary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Navigation:** {{secondary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Breadcrumb Strategy:** {{breadcrumb_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
## User Flows
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each critical user task identified in the PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define the user's goal clearly
|
||||
2. Map out all steps including decision points
|
||||
3. Consider edge cases and error states
|
||||
4. Use Mermaid flow diagrams for clarity
|
||||
5. Link to external tools (Figma/Miro) if detailed flows exist there
|
||||
|
||||
Create subsections for each major flow. After presenting all flows, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: user_flow>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{flow_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**User Goal:** {{flow_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** {{entry_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** {{success_criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{flow_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Edge Cases & Error Handling:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{edge_case_1}}
|
||||
- {{edge_case_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Notes:** {{flow_notes}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: user_flow}
|
||||
|
||||
### User Registration
|
||||
|
||||
**User Goal:** Create a new account to access the platform
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** Homepage CTA, Login page link, Marketing landing pages
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** User successfully creates account and reaches dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
Start[Landing Page] --> Click[Click Sign Up]
|
||||
Click --> Form[Registration Form]
|
||||
Form --> Fill[Fill Required Fields]
|
||||
Fill --> Submit[Submit Form]
|
||||
Submit --> Validate{Valid?}
|
||||
Validate -->|No| Error[Show Errors]
|
||||
Error --> Form
|
||||
Validate -->|Yes| Verify[Email Verification]
|
||||
Verify --> Complete[Account Created]
|
||||
Complete --> Dashboard[Redirect to Dashboard]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Edge Cases & Error Handling:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Duplicate email: Show inline error with password recovery option
|
||||
- Weak password: Real-time feedback on password strength
|
||||
- Network error: Preserve form data and show retry option
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Wireframes & Mockups
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Clarify where detailed visual designs will be created (Figma, Sketch, etc.) and how to reference them. If low-fidelity wireframes are needed, offer to help conceptualize layouts for key screens.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Design Files:** {{design_tool_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Screen Layouts
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: screen_layout>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{screen_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{screen_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Elements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{element_1}}
|
||||
- {{element_2}}
|
||||
- {{element_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Notes:** {{interaction_notes}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Design File Reference:** {{specific_frame_link}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Library / Design System
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Discuss whether to use an existing design system or create a new one. If creating new, identify foundational components and their key states. Note that detailed technical specs belong in front-end-architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Design System Approach:** {{design_system_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Components
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: component>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{component_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** {{component_variants}}
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** {{component_states}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{usage_guidelines}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: component}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Button
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** Primary interaction element for user actions
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Destructive
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** Default, Hover, Active, Disabled, Loading
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use Primary for main CTAs (one per view)
|
||||
- Secondary for supporting actions
|
||||
- Destructive only for permanent deletions with confirmation
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Branding & Style Guide
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Link to existing style guide or define key brand elements. Ensure consistency with company brand guidelines if they exist.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Visual Identity
|
||||
|
||||
**Brand Guidelines:** {{brand_guidelines_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Color Palette
|
||||
|
||||
| Color Type | Hex Code | Usage |
|
||||
| :------------ | :------------------ | :------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Primary** | {{primary_color}} | {{primary_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Secondary** | {{secondary_color}} | {{secondary_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Accent** | {{accent_color}} | {{accent_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Success** | {{success_color}} | Positive feedback, confirmations |
|
||||
| **Warning** | {{warning_color}} | Cautions, important notices |
|
||||
| **Error** | {{error_color}} | Errors, destructive actions |
|
||||
| **Neutral** | {{neutral_colors}} | Text, borders, backgrounds |
|
||||
|
||||
### Typography
|
||||
|
||||
**Font Families:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary:** {{primary_font}}
|
||||
- **Secondary:** {{secondary_font}}
|
||||
- **Monospace:** {{mono_font}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Type Scale:**
|
||||
| Element | Size | Weight | Line Height |
|
||||
|:--------|:-----|:-------|:------------|
|
||||
| H1 | {{h1_size}} | {{h1_weight}} | {{h1_line}} |
|
||||
| H2 | {{h2_size}} | {{h2_weight}} | {{h2_line}} |
|
||||
| H3 | {{h3_size}} | {{h3_weight}} | {{h3_line}} |
|
||||
| Body | {{body_size}} | {{body_weight}} | {{body_line}} |
|
||||
| Small | {{small_size}} | {{small_weight}} | {{small_line}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Iconography
|
||||
|
||||
**Icon Library:** {{icon_library}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{icon_guidelines}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Spacing & Layout
|
||||
|
||||
**Grid System:** {{grid_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Spacing Scale:** {{spacing_scale}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Accessibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define specific accessibility requirements based on target compliance level and user needs. Be comprehensive but practical.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance Target
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard:** {{compliance_standard}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Visual:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Color contrast ratios: {{contrast_requirements}}
|
||||
- Focus indicators: {{focus_requirements}}
|
||||
- Text sizing: {{text_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation: {{keyboard_requirements}}
|
||||
- Screen reader support: {{screen_reader_requirements}}
|
||||
- Touch targets: {{touch_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Alternative text: {{alt_text_requirements}}
|
||||
- Heading structure: {{heading_requirements}}
|
||||
- Form labels: {{form_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{accessibility_testing}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Responsiveness Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define breakpoints and adaptation strategies for different device sizes. Consider both technical constraints and user contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Breakpoints
|
||||
|
||||
| Breakpoint | Min Width | Max Width | Target Devices |
|
||||
| :--------- | :-------------- | :-------------- | :------------------ |
|
||||
| Mobile | {{mobile_min}} | {{mobile_max}} | {{mobile_devices}} |
|
||||
| Tablet | {{tablet_min}} | {{tablet_max}} | {{tablet_devices}} |
|
||||
| Desktop | {{desktop_min}} | {{desktop_max}} | {{desktop_devices}} |
|
||||
| Wide | {{wide_min}} | - | {{wide_devices}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Adaptation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Layout Changes:** {{layout_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Changes:** {{nav_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Priority:** {{content_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Changes:** {{interaction_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Animation & Micro-interactions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define motion design principles and key interactions. Keep performance and accessibility in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Motion Principles
|
||||
|
||||
{{motion_principles}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Animations
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: animation>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{animation_name}}:** {{animation_description}} (Duration: {{duration}}, Easing: {{easing}})
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define performance goals and strategies that impact UX design decisions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Goals
|
||||
|
||||
- **Page Load:** {{load_time_goal}}
|
||||
- **Interaction Response:** {{interaction_goal}}
|
||||
- **Animation FPS:** {{animation_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{performance_strategies}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the UI/UX specification:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Recommend review with stakeholders
|
||||
2. Suggest creating/updating visual designs in design tool
|
||||
3. Prepare for handoff to Design Architect for frontend architecture
|
||||
4. Note any open questions or decisions needed]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. {{next_step_1}}
|
||||
2. {{next_step_2}}
|
||||
3. {{next_step_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Handoff Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All user flows documented
|
||||
- [ ] Component inventory complete
|
||||
- [ ] Accessibility requirements defined
|
||||
- [ ] Responsive strategy clear
|
||||
- [ ] Brand guidelines incorporated
|
||||
- [ ] Performance goals established
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If a UI/UX checklist exists, run it against this document and report results here.]]
|
||||
349
bmad-core/templates/front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
349
bmad-core/templates/front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: frontend-spec-template-v2
|
||||
name: UI/UX Specification
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/front-end-spec.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} UI/UX Specification"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Review provided documents including Project Brief, PRD, and any user research to gather context. Focus on understanding user needs, pain points, and desired outcomes before beginning the specification.
|
||||
|
||||
Establish the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document defines the user experience goals, information architecture, user flows, and visual design specifications for {{project_name}}'s user interface. It serves as the foundation for visual design and frontend development, ensuring a cohesive and user-centered experience.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: ux-goals-principles
|
||||
title: Overall UX Goals & Principles
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Work with the user to establish and document the following. If not already defined, facilitate a discussion to determine:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Target User Personas - elicit details or confirm existing ones from PRD
|
||||
2. Key Usability Goals - understand what success looks like for users
|
||||
3. Core Design Principles - establish 3-5 guiding principles
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: user-personas
|
||||
title: Target User Personas
|
||||
template: "{{persona_descriptions}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Power User:** Technical professionals who need advanced features and efficiency"
|
||||
- "**Casual User:** Occasional users who prioritize ease of use and clear guidance"
|
||||
- "**Administrator:** System managers who need control and oversight capabilities"
|
||||
- id: usability-goals
|
||||
title: Usability Goals
|
||||
template: "{{usability_goals}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "Ease of learning: New users can complete core tasks within 5 minutes"
|
||||
- "Efficiency of use: Power users can complete frequent tasks with minimal clicks"
|
||||
- "Error prevention: Clear validation and confirmation for destructive actions"
|
||||
- "Memorability: Infrequent users can return without relearning"
|
||||
- id: design-principles
|
||||
title: Design Principles
|
||||
template: "{{design_principles}}"
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Clarity over cleverness** - Prioritize clear communication over aesthetic innovation"
|
||||
- "**Progressive disclosure** - Show only what's needed, when it's needed"
|
||||
- "**Consistent patterns** - Use familiar UI patterns throughout the application"
|
||||
- "**Immediate feedback** - Every action should have a clear, immediate response"
|
||||
- "**Accessible by default** - Design for all users from the start"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: information-architecture
|
||||
title: Information Architecture (IA)
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Collaborate with the user to create a comprehensive information architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Build a Site Map or Screen Inventory showing all major areas
|
||||
2. Define the Navigation Structure (primary, secondary, breadcrumbs)
|
||||
3. Use Mermaid diagrams for visual representation
|
||||
4. Consider user mental models and expected groupings
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: sitemap
|
||||
title: Site Map / Screen Inventory
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
template: "{{sitemap_diagram}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Homepage] --> B[Dashboard]
|
||||
A --> C[Products]
|
||||
A --> D[Account]
|
||||
B --> B1[Analytics]
|
||||
B --> B2[Recent Activity]
|
||||
C --> C1[Browse]
|
||||
C --> C2[Search]
|
||||
C --> C3[Product Details]
|
||||
D --> D1[Profile]
|
||||
D --> D2[Settings]
|
||||
D --> D3[Billing]
|
||||
- id: navigation-structure
|
||||
title: Navigation Structure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Primary Navigation:** {{primary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Navigation:** {{secondary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Breadcrumb Strategy:** {{breadcrumb_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: user-flows
|
||||
title: User Flows
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each critical user task identified in the PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define the user's goal clearly
|
||||
2. Map out all steps including decision points
|
||||
3. Consider edge cases and error states
|
||||
4. Use Mermaid flow diagrams for clarity
|
||||
5. Link to external tools (Figma/Miro) if detailed flows exist there
|
||||
|
||||
Create subsections for each major flow.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: flow
|
||||
title: "{{flow_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**User Goal:** {{flow_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** {{entry_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** {{success_criteria}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: flow-diagram
|
||||
title: Flow Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
template: "{{flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: edge-cases
|
||||
title: "Edge Cases & Error Handling:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{edge_case}}"
|
||||
- id: notes
|
||||
template: "**Notes:** {{flow_notes}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: wireframes-mockups
|
||||
title: Wireframes & Mockups
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Clarify where detailed visual designs will be created (Figma, Sketch, etc.) and how to reference them. If low-fidelity wireframes are needed, offer to help conceptualize layouts for key screens.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-files
|
||||
template: "**Primary Design Files:** {{design_tool_link}}"
|
||||
- id: key-screen-layouts
|
||||
title: Key Screen Layouts
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: screen
|
||||
title: "{{screen_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{screen_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Elements:**
|
||||
- {{element_1}}
|
||||
- {{element_2}}
|
||||
- {{element_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Notes:** {{interaction_notes}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Design File Reference:** {{specific_frame_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-library
|
||||
title: Component Library / Design System
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Discuss whether to use an existing design system or create a new one. If creating new, identify foundational components and their key states. Note that detailed technical specs belong in front-end-architecture.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-system-approach
|
||||
template: "**Design System Approach:** {{design_system_approach}}"
|
||||
- id: core-components
|
||||
title: Core Components
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{component_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** {{component_variants}}
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** {{component_states}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{usage_guidelines}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: branding-style
|
||||
title: Branding & Style Guide
|
||||
instruction: Link to existing style guide or define key brand elements. Ensure consistency with company brand guidelines if they exist.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: visual-identity
|
||||
title: Visual Identity
|
||||
template: "**Brand Guidelines:** {{brand_guidelines_link}}"
|
||||
- id: color-palette
|
||||
title: Color Palette
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Color Type", "Hex Code", "Usage"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Primary", "{{primary_color}}", "{{primary_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Secondary", "{{secondary_color}}", "{{secondary_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Accent", "{{accent_color}}", "{{accent_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Success", "{{success_color}}", "Positive feedback, confirmations"]
|
||||
- ["Warning", "{{warning_color}}", "Cautions, important notices"]
|
||||
- ["Error", "{{error_color}}", "Errors, destructive actions"]
|
||||
- ["Neutral", "{{neutral_colors}}", "Text, borders, backgrounds"]
|
||||
- id: typography
|
||||
title: Typography
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: font-families
|
||||
title: Font Families
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary:** {{primary_font}}
|
||||
- **Secondary:** {{secondary_font}}
|
||||
- **Monospace:** {{mono_font}}
|
||||
- id: type-scale
|
||||
title: Type Scale
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Element", "Size", "Weight", "Line Height"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["H1", "{{h1_size}}", "{{h1_weight}}", "{{h1_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["H2", "{{h2_size}}", "{{h2_weight}}", "{{h2_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["H3", "{{h3_size}}", "{{h3_weight}}", "{{h3_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["Body", "{{body_size}}", "{{body_weight}}", "{{body_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["Small", "{{small_size}}", "{{small_weight}}", "{{small_line}}"]
|
||||
- id: iconography
|
||||
title: Iconography
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Icon Library:** {{icon_library}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{icon_guidelines}}
|
||||
- id: spacing-layout
|
||||
title: Spacing & Layout
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Grid System:** {{grid_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Spacing Scale:** {{spacing_scale}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: accessibility
|
||||
title: Accessibility Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Define specific accessibility requirements based on target compliance level and user needs. Be comprehensive but practical.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: compliance-target
|
||||
title: Compliance Target
|
||||
template: "**Standard:** {{compliance_standard}}"
|
||||
- id: key-requirements
|
||||
title: Key Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Visual:**
|
||||
- Color contrast ratios: {{contrast_requirements}}
|
||||
- Focus indicators: {{focus_requirements}}
|
||||
- Text sizing: {{text_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction:**
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation: {{keyboard_requirements}}
|
||||
- Screen reader support: {{screen_reader_requirements}}
|
||||
- Touch targets: {{touch_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content:**
|
||||
- Alternative text: {{alt_text_requirements}}
|
||||
- Heading structure: {{heading_requirements}}
|
||||
- Form labels: {{form_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
template: "{{accessibility_testing}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: responsiveness
|
||||
title: Responsiveness Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define breakpoints and adaptation strategies for different device sizes. Consider both technical constraints and user contexts.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: breakpoints
|
||||
title: Breakpoints
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Breakpoint", "Min Width", "Max Width", "Target Devices"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Mobile", "{{mobile_min}}", "{{mobile_max}}", "{{mobile_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Tablet", "{{tablet_min}}", "{{tablet_max}}", "{{tablet_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Desktop", "{{desktop_min}}", "{{desktop_max}}", "{{desktop_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Wide", "{{wide_min}}", "-", "{{wide_devices}}"]
|
||||
- id: adaptation-patterns
|
||||
title: Adaptation Patterns
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Layout Changes:** {{layout_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Changes:** {{nav_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Priority:** {{content_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Changes:** {{interaction_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: animation
|
||||
title: Animation & Micro-interactions
|
||||
instruction: Define motion design principles and key interactions. Keep performance and accessibility in mind.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: motion-principles
|
||||
title: Motion Principles
|
||||
template: "{{motion_principles}}"
|
||||
- id: key-animations
|
||||
title: Key Animations
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{animation_name}}:** {{animation_description}} (Duration: {{duration}}, Easing: {{easing}})"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: performance
|
||||
title: Performance Considerations
|
||||
instruction: Define performance goals and strategies that impact UX design decisions.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: performance-goals
|
||||
title: Performance Goals
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Page Load:** {{load_time_goal}}
|
||||
- **Interaction Response:** {{interaction_goal}}
|
||||
- **Animation FPS:** {{animation_goal}}
|
||||
- id: design-strategies
|
||||
title: Design Strategies
|
||||
template: "{{performance_strategies}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the UI/UX specification:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Recommend review with stakeholders
|
||||
2. Suggest creating/updating visual designs in design tool
|
||||
3. Prepare for handoff to Design Architect for frontend architecture
|
||||
4. Note any open questions or decisions needed
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-actions
|
||||
title: Immediate Actions
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{action}}"
|
||||
- id: design-handoff-checklist
|
||||
title: Design Handoff Checklist
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- "All user flows documented"
|
||||
- "Component inventory complete"
|
||||
- "Accessibility requirements defined"
|
||||
- "Responsive strategy clear"
|
||||
- "Brand guidelines incorporated"
|
||||
- "Performance goals established"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results
|
||||
instruction: If a UI/UX checklist exists, run it against this document and report results here.
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
805
bmad-core/templates/fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
805
bmad-core/templates/fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,805 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: fullstack-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Fullstack Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Fullstack Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. At minimum, you should have access to docs/prd.md and docs/front-end-spec.md. Ask the user for any documents you need but cannot locate. This template creates a unified architecture that covers both backend and frontend concerns to guide AI-driven fullstack development.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the complete fullstack architecture for {{project_name}}, including backend systems, frontend implementation, and their integration. It serves as the single source of truth for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency across the entire technology stack.
|
||||
|
||||
This unified approach combines what would traditionally be separate backend and frontend architecture documents, streamlining the development process for modern fullstack applications where these concerns are increasingly intertwined.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: starter-template
|
||||
title: Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Before proceeding with architecture design, check if the project is based on any starter templates or existing codebases:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and other documents for mentions of:
|
||||
- Fullstack starter templates (e.g., T3 Stack, MEAN/MERN starters, Django + React templates)
|
||||
- Monorepo templates (e.g., Nx, Turborepo starters)
|
||||
- Platform-specific starters (e.g., Vercel templates, AWS Amplify starters)
|
||||
- Existing projects being extended or cloned
|
||||
|
||||
2. If starter templates or existing projects are mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access (links, repos, or files)
|
||||
- Analyze to understand pre-configured choices and constraints
|
||||
- Note any architectural decisions already made
|
||||
- Identify what can be modified vs what must be retained
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter is mentioned but this is greenfield:
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate fullstack starters based on tech preferences
|
||||
- Consider platform-specific options (Vercel, AWS, etc.)
|
||||
- Let user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. Document the decision and any constraints it imposes
|
||||
|
||||
If none, state "N/A - Greenfield project"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: high-level-architecture
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture
|
||||
instruction: This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation. Present all subsections together, then elicit feedback on the complete section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technical-summary
|
||||
title: Technical Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Provide a comprehensive overview (4-6 sentences) covering:
|
||||
- Overall architectural style and deployment approach
|
||||
- Frontend framework and backend technology choices
|
||||
- Key integration points between frontend and backend
|
||||
- Infrastructure platform and services
|
||||
- How this architecture achieves PRD goals
|
||||
- id: platform-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Platform and Infrastructure Choice
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on PRD requirements and technical assumptions, make a platform recommendation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Consider common patterns (not an exhaustive list, use your own best judgement and search the web as needed for emerging trends):
|
||||
- **Vercel + Supabase**: For rapid development with Next.js, built-in auth/storage
|
||||
- **AWS Full Stack**: For enterprise scale with Lambda, API Gateway, S3, Cognito
|
||||
- **Azure**: For .NET ecosystems or enterprise Microsoft environments
|
||||
- **Google Cloud**: For ML/AI heavy applications or Google ecosystem integration
|
||||
|
||||
2. Present 2-3 viable options with clear pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a recommendation with rationale
|
||||
4. Get explicit user confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Document the choice and key services that will be used.
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Platform:** {{selected_platform}}
|
||||
**Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
**Deployment Host and Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
- id: repository-structure
|
||||
title: Repository Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the repository approach based on PRD requirements and platform choice, explain your rationale or ask questions to the user if unsure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. For modern fullstack apps, monorepo is often preferred
|
||||
2. Consider tooling (Nx, Turborepo, Lerna, npm workspaces)
|
||||
3. Define package/app boundaries
|
||||
4. Plan for shared code between frontend and backend
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Structure:** {{repo_structure_choice}}
|
||||
**Monorepo Tool:** {{monorepo_tool_if_applicable}}
|
||||
**Package Organization:** {{package_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: architecture-diagram
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a Mermaid diagram showing the complete system architecture including:
|
||||
- User entry points (web, mobile)
|
||||
- Frontend application deployment
|
||||
- API layer (REST/GraphQL)
|
||||
- Backend services
|
||||
- Databases and storage
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- CDN and caching layers
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate diagram type for clarity.
|
||||
- id: architectural-patterns
|
||||
title: Architectural Patterns
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List patterns that will guide both frontend and backend development. Include patterns for:
|
||||
- Overall architecture (e.g., Jamstack, Serverless, Microservices)
|
||||
- Frontend patterns (e.g., Component-based, State management)
|
||||
- Backend patterns (e.g., Repository, CQRS, Event-driven)
|
||||
- Integration patterns (e.g., BFF, API Gateway)
|
||||
|
||||
For each pattern, provide recommendation and rationale.
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Jamstack Architecture:** Static site generation with serverless APIs - _Rationale:_ Optimal performance and scalability for content-heavy applications"
|
||||
- "**Component-Based UI:** Reusable React components with TypeScript - _Rationale:_ Maintainability and type safety across large codebases"
|
||||
- "**Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility"
|
||||
- "**API Gateway Pattern:** Single entry point for all API calls - _Rationale:_ Centralized auth, rate limiting, and monitoring"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack
|
||||
title: Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection for the entire project. Work with user to finalize all choices. This table is the single source of truth - all development must use these exact versions.
|
||||
|
||||
Key areas to cover:
|
||||
- Frontend and backend languages/frameworks
|
||||
- Databases and caching
|
||||
- Authentication and authorization
|
||||
- API approach
|
||||
- Testing tools for both frontend and backend
|
||||
- Build and deployment tools
|
||||
- Monitoring and logging
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render, elicit feedback immediately.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Frontend Language", "{{fe_language}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Frontend Framework", "{{fe_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["UI Component Library", "{{ui_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["State Management", "{{state_mgmt}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Language", "{{be_language}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Framework", "{{be_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["API Style", "{{api_style}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Database", "{{database}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Cache", "{{cache}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["File Storage", "{{storage}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Authentication", "{{auth}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Frontend Testing", "{{fe_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Testing", "{{be_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["E2E Testing", "{{e2e_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Build Tool", "{{build_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Bundler", "{{bundler}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["IaC Tool", "{{iac_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["CI/CD", "{{cicd}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Monitoring", "{{monitoring}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Logging", "{{logging}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["CSS Framework", "{{css_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the core data models/entities that will be shared between frontend and backend:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Create TypeScript interfaces that can be shared
|
||||
6. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: typescript-interface
|
||||
title: TypeScript Interface
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{model_interface}}"
|
||||
- id: relationships
|
||||
title: Relationships
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{relationship}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-spec
|
||||
title: API Specification
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the chosen API style from Tech Stack:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If REST API, create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. If GraphQL, provide the GraphQL schema
|
||||
3. If tRPC, show router definitions
|
||||
4. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
5. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
6. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
7. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate format for the chosen API style. If no API (e.g., static site), skip this section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: rest-api
|
||||
title: REST API Specification
|
||||
condition: API style is REST
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title: {{api_title}}
|
||||
version: {{api_version}}
|
||||
description: {{api_description}}
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: {{server_url}}
|
||||
description: {{server_description}}
|
||||
- id: graphql-api
|
||||
title: GraphQL Schema
|
||||
condition: API style is GraphQL
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: graphql
|
||||
template: "{{graphql_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: trpc-api
|
||||
title: tRPC Router Definitions
|
||||
condition: API style is tRPC
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{trpc_routers}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: components
|
||||
title: Components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services across the fullstack
|
||||
2. Consider both frontend and backend components
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-list
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: component-diagrams
|
||||
title: Component Diagrams
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-apis
|
||||
title: External APIs
|
||||
condition: Project requires external API integrations
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: core-workflows
|
||||
title: Core Workflows
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include both frontend and backend flows
|
||||
4. Include error handling paths
|
||||
5. Document async operations
|
||||
6. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: database-schema
|
||||
title: Database Schema
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-architecture
|
||||
title: Frontend Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define frontend-specific architecture details. After each subsection, note if user wants to refine before continuing.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-architecture
|
||||
title: Component Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define component organization and patterns based on chosen framework.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-organization
|
||||
title: Component Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{component_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: component-template
|
||||
title: Component Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{component_template}}"
|
||||
- id: state-management
|
||||
title: State Management Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Detail state management approach based on chosen solution.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: state-structure
|
||||
title: State Structure
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{state_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: state-patterns
|
||||
title: State Management Patterns
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{pattern}}"
|
||||
- id: routing-architecture
|
||||
title: Routing Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define routing structure based on framework choice.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: route-organization
|
||||
title: Route Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{route_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: protected-routes
|
||||
title: Protected Route Pattern
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{protected_route_example}}"
|
||||
- id: frontend-services
|
||||
title: Frontend Services Layer
|
||||
instruction: Define how frontend communicates with backend.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api-client-setup
|
||||
title: API Client Setup
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{api_client_setup}}"
|
||||
- id: service-example
|
||||
title: Service Example
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{service_example}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: backend-architecture
|
||||
title: Backend Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define backend-specific architecture details. Consider serverless vs traditional server approaches.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: service-architecture
|
||||
title: Service Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Based on platform choice, define service organization.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: serverless-architecture
|
||||
condition: Serverless architecture chosen
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: function-organization
|
||||
title: Function Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{function_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: function-template
|
||||
title: Function Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{function_template}}"
|
||||
- id: traditional-server
|
||||
condition: Traditional server architecture chosen
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: controller-organization
|
||||
title: Controller/Route Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{controller_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: controller-template
|
||||
title: Controller Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{controller_template}}"
|
||||
- id: database-architecture
|
||||
title: Database Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define database schema and access patterns.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: schema-design
|
||||
title: Schema Design
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: sql
|
||||
template: "{{database_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: data-access-layer
|
||||
title: Data Access Layer
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{repository_pattern}}"
|
||||
- id: auth-architecture
|
||||
title: Authentication and Authorization
|
||||
instruction: Define auth implementation details.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: auth-flow
|
||||
title: Auth Flow
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
template: "{{auth_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: auth-middleware
|
||||
title: Middleware/Guards
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{auth_middleware}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: unified-project-structure
|
||||
title: Unified Project Structure
|
||||
instruction: Create a monorepo structure that accommodates both frontend and backend. Adapt based on chosen tools and frameworks.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
{{project-name}}/
|
||||
├── .github/ # CI/CD workflows
|
||||
│ └── workflows/
|
||||
│ ├── ci.yaml
|
||||
│ └── deploy.yaml
|
||||
├── apps/ # Application packages
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── components/ # UI components
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── pages/ # Page components/routes
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── hooks/ # Custom React hooks
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── services/ # API client services
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── stores/ # State management
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── styles/ # Global styles/themes
|
||||
│ │ │ └── utils/ # Frontend utilities
|
||||
│ │ ├── public/ # Static assets
|
||||
│ │ ├── tests/ # Frontend tests
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ └── api/ # Backend application
|
||||
│ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ ├── routes/ # API routes/controllers
|
||||
│ │ ├── services/ # Business logic
|
||||
│ │ ├── models/ # Data models
|
||||
│ │ ├── middleware/ # Express/API middleware
|
||||
│ │ ├── utils/ # Backend utilities
|
||||
│ │ └── {{serverless_or_server_entry}}
|
||||
│ ├── tests/ # Backend tests
|
||||
│ └── package.json
|
||||
├── packages/ # Shared packages
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared types/utilities
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── types/ # TypeScript interfaces
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── constants/ # Shared constants
|
||||
│ │ │ └── utils/ # Shared utilities
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ ├── ui/ # Shared UI components
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ └── config/ # Shared configuration
|
||||
│ ├── eslint/
|
||||
│ ├── typescript/
|
||||
│ └── jest/
|
||||
├── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
│ └── {{iac_structure}}
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Build/deploy scripts
|
||||
├── docs/ # Documentation
|
||||
│ ├── prd.md
|
||||
│ ├── front-end-spec.md
|
||||
│ └── fullstack-architecture.md
|
||||
├── .env.example # Environment template
|
||||
├── package.json # Root package.json
|
||||
├── {{monorepo_config}} # Monorepo configuration
|
||||
└── README.md
|
||||
|
||||
- id: development-workflow
|
||||
title: Development Workflow
|
||||
instruction: Define the development setup and workflow for the fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: local-setup
|
||||
title: Local Development Setup
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: prerequisites
|
||||
title: Prerequisites
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: "{{prerequisites_commands}}"
|
||||
- id: initial-setup
|
||||
title: Initial Setup
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: "{{setup_commands}}"
|
||||
- id: dev-commands
|
||||
title: Development Commands
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
# Start all services
|
||||
{{start_all_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Start frontend only
|
||||
{{start_frontend_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Start backend only
|
||||
{{start_backend_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Run tests
|
||||
{{test_commands}}
|
||||
- id: environment-config
|
||||
title: Environment Configuration
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: env-vars
|
||||
title: Required Environment Variables
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
# Frontend (.env.local)
|
||||
{{frontend_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Backend (.env)
|
||||
{{backend_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Shared
|
||||
{{shared_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: deployment-architecture
|
||||
title: Deployment Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define deployment strategy based on platform choice.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: deployment-strategy
|
||||
title: Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Deployment:**
|
||||
- **Platform:** {{frontend_deploy_platform}}
|
||||
- **Build Command:** {{frontend_build_command}}
|
||||
- **Output Directory:** {{frontend_output_dir}}
|
||||
- **CDN/Edge:** {{cdn_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Deployment:**
|
||||
- **Platform:** {{backend_deploy_platform}}
|
||||
- **Build Command:** {{backend_build_command}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{deployment_method}}
|
||||
- id: cicd-pipeline
|
||||
title: CI/CD Pipeline
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
template: "{{cicd_pipeline_config}}"
|
||||
- id: environments
|
||||
title: Environments
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Environment, Frontend URL, Backend URL, Purpose]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Development", "{{dev_fe_url}}", "{{dev_be_url}}", "Local development"]
|
||||
- ["Staging", "{{staging_fe_url}}", "{{staging_be_url}}", "Pre-production testing"]
|
||||
- ["Production", "{{prod_fe_url}}", "{{prod_be_url}}", "Live environment"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security-performance
|
||||
title: Security and Performance
|
||||
instruction: Define security and performance considerations for the fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: security-requirements
|
||||
title: Security Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Security:**
|
||||
- CSP Headers: {{csp_policy}}
|
||||
- XSS Prevention: {{xss_strategy}}
|
||||
- Secure Storage: {{storage_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Security:**
|
||||
- Input Validation: {{validation_approach}}
|
||||
- Rate Limiting: {{rate_limit_config}}
|
||||
- CORS Policy: {{cors_config}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Authentication Security:**
|
||||
- Token Storage: {{token_strategy}}
|
||||
- Session Management: {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- Password Policy: {{password_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: performance-optimization
|
||||
title: Performance Optimization
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Performance:**
|
||||
- Bundle Size Target: {{bundle_size}}
|
||||
- Loading Strategy: {{loading_approach}}
|
||||
- Caching Strategy: {{fe_cache_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Performance:**
|
||||
- Response Time Target: {{response_target}}
|
||||
- Database Optimization: {{db_optimization}}
|
||||
- Caching Strategy: {{be_cache_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define comprehensive testing approach for fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-pyramid
|
||||
title: Testing Pyramid
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
E2E Tests
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
Integration Tests
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
Frontend Unit Backend Unit
|
||||
- id: test-organization
|
||||
title: Test Organization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: frontend-tests
|
||||
title: Frontend Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-tests
|
||||
title: Backend Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{backend_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: e2e-tests
|
||||
title: E2E Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{e2e_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: test-examples
|
||||
title: Test Examples
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: frontend-test
|
||||
title: Frontend Component Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_test_example}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-test
|
||||
title: Backend API Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{backend_test_example}}"
|
||||
- id: e2e-test
|
||||
title: E2E Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{e2e_test_example}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards
|
||||
instruction: Define MINIMAL but CRITICAL standards for AI agents. Focus only on project-specific rules that prevent common mistakes. These will be used by dev agents.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: critical-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Fullstack Rules
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Type Sharing:** Always define types in packages/shared and import from there"
|
||||
- "**API Calls:** Never make direct HTTP calls - use the service layer"
|
||||
- "**Environment Variables:** Access only through config objects, never process.env directly"
|
||||
- "**Error Handling:** All API routes must use the standard error handler"
|
||||
- "**State Updates:** Never mutate state directly - use proper state management patterns"
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Element, Frontend, Backend, Example]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Components", "PascalCase", "-", "`UserProfile.tsx`"]
|
||||
- ["Hooks", "camelCase with 'use'", "-", "`useAuth.ts`"]
|
||||
- ["API Routes", "-", "kebab-case", "`/api/user-profile`"]
|
||||
- ["Database Tables", "-", "snake_case", "`user_profiles`"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: error-handling
|
||||
title: Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define unified error handling across frontend and backend.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: error-flow
|
||||
title: Error Flow
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
template: "{{error_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: error-format
|
||||
title: Error Response Format
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
interface ApiError {
|
||||
error: {
|
||||
code: string;
|
||||
message: string;
|
||||
details?: Record<string, any>;
|
||||
timestamp: string;
|
||||
requestId: string;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
- id: frontend-error-handling
|
||||
title: Frontend Error Handling
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_error_handler}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-error-handling
|
||||
title: Backend Error Handling
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{backend_error_handler}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: monitoring
|
||||
title: Monitoring and Observability
|
||||
instruction: Define monitoring strategy for fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: monitoring-stack
|
||||
title: Monitoring Stack
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Frontend Monitoring:** {{frontend_monitoring}}
|
||||
- **Backend Monitoring:** {{backend_monitoring}}
|
||||
- **Error Tracking:** {{error_tracking}}
|
||||
- **Performance Monitoring:** {{perf_monitoring}}
|
||||
- id: key-metrics
|
||||
title: Key Metrics
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Metrics:**
|
||||
- Core Web Vitals
|
||||
- JavaScript errors
|
||||
- API response times
|
||||
- User interactions
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Metrics:**
|
||||
- Request rate
|
||||
- Error rate
|
||||
- Response time
|
||||
- Database query performance
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the architect-checklist and populate results here.
|
||||
@@ -1,263 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Report: {{Project/Product Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/market-research.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides the creation of a comprehensive market research report. Begin by understanding what market insights the user needs and why. Work through each section systematically, using the appropriate analytical frameworks based on the research objectives.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{Provide a high-level overview of key findings, market opportunity assessment, and strategic recommendations. Write this section LAST after completing all other sections.}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Objectives & Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
{{List the primary objectives of this market research:
|
||||
|
||||
- What decisions will this research inform?
|
||||
- What specific questions need to be answered?
|
||||
- What are the success criteria for this research?}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the research approach:
|
||||
|
||||
- Data sources used (primary/secondary)
|
||||
- Analysis frameworks applied
|
||||
- Data collection timeframe
|
||||
- Limitations and assumptions}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Definition
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the market being analyzed:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product/service category
|
||||
- Geographic scope
|
||||
- Customer segments included
|
||||
- Value chain position}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size & Growth
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Guide through TAM, SAM, SOM calculations with clear assumptions. Use one or more approaches:
|
||||
|
||||
- Top-down: Start with industry data, narrow down
|
||||
- Bottom-up: Build from customer/unit economics
|
||||
- Value theory: Based on value provided vs. alternatives]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Total Addressable Market (TAM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Calculate and explain the total market opportunity}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the portion of TAM you can realistically reach}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Estimate the portion you can realistically capture}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Trends & Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze key trends shaping the market using appropriate frameworks like PESTEL]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Key Market Trends
|
||||
|
||||
{{List and explain 3-5 major trends:
|
||||
|
||||
- Trend 1: Description and impact
|
||||
- Trend 2: Description and impact
|
||||
- etc.}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Growth Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify primary factors driving market growth}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Market Inhibitors
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify factors constraining market growth}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Customer Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Segment Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each segment, create detailed profiles including demographics/firmographics, psychographics, behaviors, needs, and willingness to pay]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Segment 1: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Description:** {{Brief overview}}
|
||||
- **Size:** {{Number of customers/market value}}
|
||||
- **Characteristics:** {{Key demographics/firmographics}}
|
||||
- **Needs & Pain Points:** {{Primary problems they face}}
|
||||
- **Buying Process:** {{How they make purchasing decisions}}
|
||||
- **Willingness to Pay:** {{Price sensitivity and value perception}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for each additional segment>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Uncover what customers are really trying to accomplish]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Functional Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{List practical tasks and objectives customers need to complete}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Emotional Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe feelings and perceptions customers seek}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Social Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{Explain how customers want to be perceived by others}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Map the end-to-end customer experience for primary segments]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{For primary customer segment:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Awareness:** How they discover solutions
|
||||
2. **Consideration:** Evaluation criteria and process
|
||||
3. **Purchase:** Decision triggers and barriers
|
||||
4. **Onboarding:** Initial experience expectations
|
||||
5. **Usage:** Ongoing interaction patterns
|
||||
6. **Advocacy:** Referral and expansion behaviors}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Structure
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the overall competitive environment:
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration
|
||||
- Competitive intensity}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Major Players Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
{{For top 3-5 competitors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Company name and brief description
|
||||
- Market share estimate
|
||||
- Key strengths and weaknesses
|
||||
- Target customer focus
|
||||
- Pricing strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analyze how competitors are positioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Value propositions
|
||||
- Differentiation strategies
|
||||
- Market gaps and opportunities}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Industry Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Porter's Five Forces Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze each force with specific evidence and implications]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Supplier Power: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Buyer Power: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Competitive Rivalry: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Threat of New Entry: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Threat of Substitutes: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Lifecycle Stage
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify where the market is in the adoption curve:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current stage and evidence
|
||||
- Implications for strategy
|
||||
- Expected progression timeline}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify specific opportunities based on the analysis]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Opportunity 1: {{Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Description:** {{What is the opportunity?}}
|
||||
- **Size/Potential:** {{Quantify if possible}}
|
||||
- **Requirements:** {{What's needed to capture it?}}
|
||||
- **Risks:** {{Key challenges or barriers}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for additional opportunities>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Recommend approach for market entry/expansion:
|
||||
|
||||
- Target segment prioritization
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Channel strategy
|
||||
- Partnership opportunities}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Pricing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Based on willingness to pay analysis and competitive landscape:
|
||||
|
||||
- Recommended pricing model
|
||||
- Price points/ranges
|
||||
- Value metric
|
||||
- Competitive positioning}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
{{Key risks and mitigation strategies:
|
||||
|
||||
- Market risks
|
||||
- Competitive risks
|
||||
- Execution risks
|
||||
- Regulatory/compliance risks}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Data Sources
|
||||
|
||||
{{List all sources used in the research}}
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Detailed Calculations
|
||||
|
||||
{{Include any complex calculations or models}}
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Additional Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
{{Any supplementary analysis not included in main body}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the document, offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for market research:
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Elicitation Actions** 0. Expand market sizing calculations with sensitivity analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. Deep dive into a specific customer segment
|
||||
2. Analyze an emerging market trend in detail
|
||||
3. Compare this market to an analogous market
|
||||
4. Stress test market assumptions
|
||||
5. Explore adjacent market opportunities
|
||||
6. Challenge market definition and boundaries
|
||||
7. Generate strategic scenarios (best/base/worst case)
|
||||
8. If only we had considered [X market factor]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on market research documents.]]
|
||||
252
bmad-core/templates/market-research-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
252
bmad-core/templates/market-research-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: market-research-template-v2
|
||||
name: Market Research Report
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/market-research.md
|
||||
title: "Market Research Report: {{project_product_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Market Research Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Expand market sizing calculations with sensitivity analysis"
|
||||
- "Deep dive into a specific customer segment"
|
||||
- "Analyze an emerging market trend in detail"
|
||||
- "Compare this market to an analogous market"
|
||||
- "Stress test market assumptions"
|
||||
- "Explore adjacent market opportunities"
|
||||
- "Challenge market definition and boundaries"
|
||||
- "Generate strategic scenarios (best/base/worst case)"
|
||||
- "If only we had considered [X market factor]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: Provide a high-level overview of key findings, market opportunity assessment, and strategic recommendations. Write this section LAST after completing all other sections.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: research-objectives
|
||||
title: Research Objectives & Methodology
|
||||
instruction: This template guides the creation of a comprehensive market research report. Begin by understanding what market insights the user needs and why. Work through each section systematically, using the appropriate analytical frameworks based on the research objectives.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: objectives
|
||||
title: Research Objectives
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List the primary objectives of this market research:
|
||||
- What decisions will this research inform?
|
||||
- What specific questions need to be answered?
|
||||
- What are the success criteria for this research?
|
||||
- id: methodology
|
||||
title: Research Methodology
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the research approach:
|
||||
- Data sources used (primary/secondary)
|
||||
- Analysis frameworks applied
|
||||
- Data collection timeframe
|
||||
- Limitations and assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
- id: market-overview
|
||||
title: Market Overview
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-definition
|
||||
title: Market Definition
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the market being analyzed:
|
||||
- Product/service category
|
||||
- Geographic scope
|
||||
- Customer segments included
|
||||
- Value chain position
|
||||
- id: market-size-growth
|
||||
title: Market Size & Growth
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Guide through TAM, SAM, SOM calculations with clear assumptions. Use one or more approaches:
|
||||
- Top-down: Start with industry data, narrow down
|
||||
- Bottom-up: Build from customer/unit economics
|
||||
- Value theory: Based on value provided vs. alternatives
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tam
|
||||
title: Total Addressable Market (TAM)
|
||||
instruction: Calculate and explain the total market opportunity
|
||||
- id: sam
|
||||
title: Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
|
||||
instruction: Define the portion of TAM you can realistically reach
|
||||
- id: som
|
||||
title: Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
|
||||
instruction: Estimate the portion you can realistically capture
|
||||
- id: market-trends
|
||||
title: Market Trends & Drivers
|
||||
instruction: Analyze key trends shaping the market using appropriate frameworks like PESTEL
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-trends
|
||||
title: Key Market Trends
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List and explain 3-5 major trends:
|
||||
- Trend 1: Description and impact
|
||||
- Trend 2: Description and impact
|
||||
- etc.
|
||||
- id: growth-drivers
|
||||
title: Growth Drivers
|
||||
instruction: Identify primary factors driving market growth
|
||||
- id: market-inhibitors
|
||||
title: Market Inhibitors
|
||||
instruction: Identify factors constraining market growth
|
||||
|
||||
- id: customer-analysis
|
||||
title: Customer Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: segment-profiles
|
||||
title: Target Segment Profiles
|
||||
instruction: For each segment, create detailed profiles including demographics/firmographics, psychographics, behaviors, needs, and willingness to pay
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: segment
|
||||
title: "Segment {{segment_number}}: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Description:** {{brief_overview}}
|
||||
- **Size:** {{number_of_customers_market_value}}
|
||||
- **Characteristics:** {{key_demographics_firmographics}}
|
||||
- **Needs & Pain Points:** {{primary_problems}}
|
||||
- **Buying Process:** {{purchasing_decisions}}
|
||||
- **Willingness to Pay:** {{price_sensitivity}}
|
||||
- id: jobs-to-be-done
|
||||
title: Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis
|
||||
instruction: Uncover what customers are really trying to accomplish
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: functional-jobs
|
||||
title: Functional Jobs
|
||||
instruction: List practical tasks and objectives customers need to complete
|
||||
- id: emotional-jobs
|
||||
title: Emotional Jobs
|
||||
instruction: Describe feelings and perceptions customers seek
|
||||
- id: social-jobs
|
||||
title: Social Jobs
|
||||
instruction: Explain how customers want to be perceived by others
|
||||
- id: customer-journey
|
||||
title: Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
instruction: Map the end-to-end customer experience for primary segments
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
For primary customer segment:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Awareness:** {{discovery_process}}
|
||||
2. **Consideration:** {{evaluation_criteria}}
|
||||
3. **Purchase:** {{decision_triggers}}
|
||||
4. **Onboarding:** {{initial_expectations}}
|
||||
5. **Usage:** {{interaction_patterns}}
|
||||
6. **Advocacy:** {{referral_behaviors}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitive-landscape
|
||||
title: Competitive Landscape
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-structure
|
||||
title: Market Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the overall competitive environment:
|
||||
- Number of competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration
|
||||
- Competitive intensity
|
||||
- id: major-players
|
||||
title: Major Players Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For top 3-5 competitors:
|
||||
- Company name and brief description
|
||||
- Market share estimate
|
||||
- Key strengths and weaknesses
|
||||
- Target customer focus
|
||||
- Pricing strategy
|
||||
- id: competitive-positioning
|
||||
title: Competitive Positioning
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Analyze how competitors are positioned:
|
||||
- Value propositions
|
||||
- Differentiation strategies
|
||||
- Market gaps and opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
- id: industry-analysis
|
||||
title: Industry Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: porters-five-forces
|
||||
title: Porter's Five Forces Assessment
|
||||
instruction: Analyze each force with specific evidence and implications
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: supplier-power
|
||||
title: "Supplier Power: {{power_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: buyer-power
|
||||
title: "Buyer Power: {{power_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: competitive-rivalry
|
||||
title: "Competitive Rivalry: {{intensity_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: threat-new-entry
|
||||
title: "Threat of New Entry: {{threat_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: threat-substitutes
|
||||
title: "Threat of Substitutes: {{threat_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: adoption-lifecycle
|
||||
title: Technology Adoption Lifecycle Stage
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify where the market is in the adoption curve:
|
||||
- Current stage and evidence
|
||||
- Implications for strategy
|
||||
- Expected progression timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- id: opportunity-assessment
|
||||
title: Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-opportunities
|
||||
title: Market Opportunities
|
||||
instruction: Identify specific opportunities based on the analysis
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: opportunity
|
||||
title: "Opportunity {{opportunity_number}}: {{name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Description:** {{what_is_the_opportunity}}
|
||||
- **Size/Potential:** {{quantified_potential}}
|
||||
- **Requirements:** {{needed_to_capture}}
|
||||
- **Risks:** {{key_challenges}}
|
||||
- id: strategic-recommendations
|
||||
title: Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: go-to-market
|
||||
title: Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Recommend approach for market entry/expansion:
|
||||
- Target segment prioritization
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Channel strategy
|
||||
- Partnership opportunities
|
||||
- id: pricing-strategy
|
||||
title: Pricing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on willingness to pay analysis and competitive landscape:
|
||||
- Recommended pricing model
|
||||
- Price points/ranges
|
||||
- Value metric
|
||||
- Competitive positioning
|
||||
- id: risk-mitigation
|
||||
title: Risk Mitigation
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Key risks and mitigation strategies:
|
||||
- Market risks
|
||||
- Competitive risks
|
||||
- Execution risks
|
||||
- Regulatory/compliance risks
|
||||
|
||||
- id: appendices
|
||||
title: Appendices
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: data-sources
|
||||
title: A. Data Sources
|
||||
instruction: List all sources used in the research
|
||||
- id: calculations
|
||||
title: B. Detailed Calculations
|
||||
instruction: Include any complex calculations or models
|
||||
- id: additional-analysis
|
||||
title: C. Additional Analysis
|
||||
instruction: Any supplementary analysis not included in main body
|
||||
@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Product Requirements Document (PRD)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/prd.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If available, review any provided document or ask if any are optionally available: Project Brief]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals and Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Populate the 2 child sections based on what we have received from user description or the provided brief. Allow user to review the 2 sections and offer changes before proceeding]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Bullet list of 1 line desired outcomes the PRD will deliver if successful - user and project desires]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: 1-2 short paragraphs summarizing the background context, such as what we learned in the brief without being redundant with the goals, what and why this solves a problem, what the current landscape or need is etc...]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Draft the list of functional and non functional requirements under the two child sections, and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown and an identifier sequence starting with FR`.]]
|
||||
@{example: - FR6: The Todo List uses AI to detect and warn against adding potentially duplicate todo items that are worded differently.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Non Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown and an identifier sequence starting with NFR`.]]
|
||||
@{example: - NFR1: AWS service usage **must** aim to stay within free-tier limits where feasible.}
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## User Interface Design Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Capture high-level UI/UX vision to guide Design Architect and to inform story creation. Steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Pre-fill all subsections with educated guesses based on project context
|
||||
2. Present the complete rendered section to user
|
||||
3. Clearly let the user know where assumptions were made
|
||||
4. Ask targeted questions for unclear/missing elements or areas needing more specification
|
||||
5. This is NOT detailed UI spec - focus on product vision and user goals
|
||||
6. After section completion, immediately apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall UX Vision
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Interaction Paradigms
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Screens and Views
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: From a product perspective, what are the most critical screens or views necessary to deliver the the PRD values and goals? This is meant to be Conceptual High Level to Drive Rough Epic or User Stories]]
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
|
||||
- Login Screen
|
||||
- Main Dashboard
|
||||
- Item Detail Page
|
||||
- Settings Page
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Accessibility: { None, WCAG, etc }
|
||||
|
||||
### Branding
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Any known branding elements or style guides that must be incorporated?]]
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
|
||||
- Replicate the look and feel of early 1900s black and white cinema, including animated effects replicating film damage or projector glitches during page or state transitions.
|
||||
- Attached is the full color pallet and tokens for our corporate branding.
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Device and Platforms
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
"Web Responsive, and all mobile platforms", "IPhone Only", "ASCII Windows Desktop"
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Gather technical decisions that will guide the Architect. Steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Check if `{root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml` or an attached `technical-preferences` file exists - use it to pre-populate choices
|
||||
2. Ask user about: languages, frameworks, starter templates, libraries, APIs, deployment targets
|
||||
3. For unknowns, offer guidance based on project goals and MVP scope
|
||||
4. Document ALL technical choices with rationale (why this choice fits the project)
|
||||
5. These become constraints for the Architect - be specific and complete
|
||||
6. After section completion, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Structure: { Monorepo, Polyrepo, etc...}
|
||||
|
||||
### Service Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL DECISION - Document the high-level service architecture (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless functions within a Monorepo).]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL DECISION - Document the testing requirements, unit only, integration, e2e, manual, need for manual testing convenience methods).]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Technical Assumptions and Requests
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Throughout the entire process of drafting this document, if any other technical assumptions are raised or discovered appropriate for the architect, add them here as additional bulleted items]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epics
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, present a high-level list of all epics for user approval, the epic_list and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display. Each epic should have a title and a short (1 sentence) goal statement. This allows the user to review the overall structure before diving into details.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Epics MUST be logically sequential following agile best practices:
|
||||
|
||||
- Each epic should deliver a significant, end-to-end, fully deployable increment of testable functionality
|
||||
- Epic 1 must establish foundational project infrastructure (app setup, Git, CI/CD, core services) unless we are adding new functionality to an existing app, while also delivering an initial piece of functionality, even as simple as a health-check route or display of a simple canary page - remember this when we produce the stories for the first epic!
|
||||
- Each subsequent epic builds upon previous epics' functionality delivering major blocks of functionality that provide tangible value to users or business when deployed
|
||||
- Not every project needs multiple epics, an epic needs to deliver value. For example, an API completed can deliver value even if a UI is not complete and planned for a separate epic.
|
||||
- Err on the side of less epics, but let the user know your rationale and offer options for splitting them if it seems some are too large or focused on disparate things.
|
||||
- Cross Cutting Concerns should flow through epics and stories and not be final stories. For example, adding a logging framework as a last story of an epic, or at the end of a project as a final epic or story would be terrible as we would not have logging from the beginning.]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: epic_list>>
|
||||
|
||||
- Epic{{epic_number}} {{epic_title}}: {{short_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: epic_list}
|
||||
|
||||
1. Foundation & Core Infrastructure: Establish project setup, authentication, and basic user management
|
||||
2. Core Business Entities: Create and manage primary domain objects with CRUD operations
|
||||
3. User Workflows & Interactions: Enable key user journeys and business processes
|
||||
4. Reporting & Analytics: Provide insights and data visualization for users
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After the epic list is approved, present each `epic_details` with all its stories and acceptance criteria as a complete review unit and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display, before moving on to the next epic.]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: epic_details>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic {{epic_number}} {{epic_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{epic_goal}} [[LLM: Expanded goal - 2-3 sentences describing the objective and value all the stories will achieve]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING REQUIREMENTS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Stories within each epic MUST be logically sequential
|
||||
- Each story should be a "vertical slice" delivering complete functionality aside from early enabler stories for project foundation
|
||||
- No story should depend on work from a later story or epic
|
||||
- Identify and note any direct prerequisite stories
|
||||
- Focus on "what" and "why" not "how" (leave technical implementation to Architect) yet be precise enough to support a logical sequential order of operations from story to story.
|
||||
- Ensure each story delivers clear user or business value, try to avoid enablers and build them into stories that deliver value.
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution: Each story must be completable by a single AI agent in one focused session without context overflow
|
||||
- Think "junior developer working for 2-4 hours" - stories must be small, focused, and self-contained
|
||||
- If a story seems complex, break it down further as long as it can deliver a vertical slice
|
||||
- Each story should result in working, testable code before the agent's context window fills]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: story>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Story {{epic_number}}.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define clear, comprehensive, and testable acceptance criteria that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Precisely define what "done" means from a functional perspective
|
||||
- Are unambiguous and serve as basis for verification
|
||||
- Include any critical non-functional requirements from the PRD
|
||||
- Consider local testability for backend/data components
|
||||
- Specify UI/UX requirements and framework adherence where applicable
|
||||
- Avoid cross-cutting concerns that should be in other stories or PRD sections]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: criteria>>
|
||||
|
||||
- {{criterion number}}: {{criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before running the checklist and drafting the prompts, offer to output the full updated PRD. If outputting it, confirm with the user that you will be proceeding to run the checklist and produce the report. Once the user confirms, execute the `pm-checklist` and populate the results in this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section will contain the prompt for the Design Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section will contain the prompt for the Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.]]
|
||||
@@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ sections:
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-architect-prompt
|
||||
title: Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
instruction: This section will contain the prompt for the Design Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.
|
||||
- id: ux-expert-prompt
|
||||
title: UX Expert Prompt
|
||||
instruction: This section will contain the prompt for the UX Expert, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.
|
||||
- id: architect-prompt
|
||||
title: Architect Prompt
|
||||
instruction: This section will contain the prompt for the Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.
|
||||
@@ -1,232 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/brief.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Project Brief: {{Project Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides creation of a comprehensive Project Brief that serves as the foundational input for product development.
|
||||
|
||||
Start by asking the user which mode they prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Interactive Mode** - Work through each section collaboratively
|
||||
2. **YOLO Mode** - Generate complete draft for review and refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning, understand what inputs are available (brainstorming results, market research, competitive analysis, initial ideas) and gather project context.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a concise overview that captures the essence of the project. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product concept in 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Primary problem being solved
|
||||
- Target market identification
|
||||
- Key value proposition]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Write executive summary based on information gathered}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Articulate the problem with clarity and evidence. Address:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current state and pain points
|
||||
- Impact of the problem (quantify if possible)
|
||||
- Why existing solutions fall short
|
||||
- Urgency and importance of solving this now]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Detailed problem description with supporting evidence}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Solution
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe the solution approach at a high level. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Core concept and approach
|
||||
- Key differentiators from existing solutions
|
||||
- Why this solution will succeed where others haven't
|
||||
- High-level vision for the product]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Solution description focusing on the "what" and "why", not implementation details}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Users
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define and characterize the intended users with specificity. For each user segment include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Demographic/firmographic profile
|
||||
- Current behaviors and workflows
|
||||
- Specific needs and pain points
|
||||
- Goals they're trying to achieve]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary User Segment: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Detailed description of primary users}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary User Segment: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Description of secondary users if applicable}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals & Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Establish clear objectives and how to measure success. Make goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Objective 1 with metric}}
|
||||
- {{Objective 2 with metric}}
|
||||
- {{Objective 3 with metric}}
|
||||
|
||||
### User Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- {{How users will measure value}}
|
||||
- {{Engagement metrics}}
|
||||
- {{Satisfaction indicators}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
|
||||
|
||||
- {{KPI 1: Definition and target}}
|
||||
- {{KPI 2: Definition and target}}
|
||||
- {{KPI 3: Definition and target}}
|
||||
|
||||
## MVP Scope
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the minimum viable product clearly. Be specific about what's in and what's out. Help user distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Features (Must Have)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Feature 1:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
- **Feature 2:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
- **Feature 3:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Out of Scope for MVP
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Feature/capability explicitly not in MVP}}
|
||||
- {{Feature/capability to be considered post-MVP}}
|
||||
|
||||
### MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define what constitutes a successful MVP launch}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-MVP Vision
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Outline the longer-term product direction without overcommitting to specifics]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 Features
|
||||
|
||||
{{Next priority features after MVP success}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-term Vision
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where this product could go in 1-2 years}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Expansion Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
{{Potential new markets, use cases, or integrations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document known technical constraints and preferences. Note these are initial thoughts, not final decisions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Platform Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **Target Platforms:** {{Web, mobile, desktop, etc.}}
|
||||
- **Browser/OS Support:** {{Specific requirements}}
|
||||
- **Performance Requirements:** {{Load times, concurrent users, etc.}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Preferences
|
||||
|
||||
- **Frontend:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Backend:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Database:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Hosting/Infrastructure:** {{Cloud preferences, on-prem requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- **Repository Structure:** {{Initial thoughts on monorepo vs. polyrepo}}
|
||||
- **Service Architecture:** {{Initial thoughts on monolith vs. microservices}}
|
||||
- **Integration Requirements:** {{Third-party services, APIs}}
|
||||
- **Security/Compliance:** {{Any specific requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Constraints & Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Clearly state limitations and assumptions to set realistic expectations]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- **Budget:** {{If known}}
|
||||
- **Timeline:** {{Target launch date or development timeframe}}
|
||||
- **Resources:** {{Team size, skill constraints}}
|
||||
- **Technical:** {{Legacy systems, required tech stack}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Assumption about users, market, or technology}}
|
||||
- {{Assumption about resources or support}}
|
||||
- {{Assumption about external dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify unknowns and potential challenges proactively]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- **Risk 1:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
- **Risk 2:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
- **Risk 3:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Question needing research or decision}}
|
||||
- {{Question about technical approach}}
|
||||
- {{Question about market or users}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Areas Needing Further Research
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Topic requiring deeper investigation}}
|
||||
- {{Validation needed before proceeding}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Research Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{If applicable, summarize key findings from:
|
||||
|
||||
- Market research
|
||||
- Competitive analysis
|
||||
- User interviews
|
||||
- Technical feasibility studies}}
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Stakeholder Input
|
||||
|
||||
{{Key feedback or requirements from stakeholders}}
|
||||
|
||||
### C. References
|
||||
|
||||
{{Links to relevant documents, research, or examples}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. {{First concrete next step}}
|
||||
2. {{Second concrete next step}}
|
||||
3. {{Third concrete next step}}
|
||||
|
||||
### PM Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
This Project Brief provides the full context for {{Project Name}}. Please start in 'PRD Generation Mode', review the brief thoroughly to work with the user to create the PRD section by section as the template indicates, asking for any necessary clarification or suggesting improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing each major section (not subsections), offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for project briefs:
|
||||
|
||||
**Project Brief Elicitation Actions** 0. Expand section with more specific details
|
||||
|
||||
1. Validate against similar successful products
|
||||
2. Stress test assumptions with edge cases
|
||||
3. Explore alternative solution approaches
|
||||
4. Analyze resource/constraint trade-offs
|
||||
5. Generate risk mitigation strategies
|
||||
6. Challenge scope from MVP minimalist view
|
||||
7. Brainstorm creative feature possibilities
|
||||
8. If only we had [resource/capability/time]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on project brief documents.]]
|
||||
221
bmad-core/templates/project-brief-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
221
bmad-core/templates/project-brief-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: project-brief-template-v2
|
||||
name: Project Brief
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/brief.md
|
||||
title: "Project Brief: {{project_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Project Brief Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Expand section with more specific details"
|
||||
- "Validate against similar successful products"
|
||||
- "Stress test assumptions with edge cases"
|
||||
- "Explore alternative solution approaches"
|
||||
- "Analyze resource/constraint trade-offs"
|
||||
- "Generate risk mitigation strategies"
|
||||
- "Challenge scope from MVP minimalist view"
|
||||
- "Brainstorm creative feature possibilities"
|
||||
- "If only we had [resource/capability/time]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This template guides creation of a comprehensive Project Brief that serves as the foundational input for product development.
|
||||
|
||||
Start by asking the user which mode they prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Interactive Mode** - Work through each section collaboratively
|
||||
2. **YOLO Mode** - Generate complete draft for review and refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning, understand what inputs are available (brainstorming results, market research, competitive analysis, initial ideas) and gather project context.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a concise overview that captures the essence of the project. Include:
|
||||
- Product concept in 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Primary problem being solved
|
||||
- Target market identification
|
||||
- Key value proposition
|
||||
template: "{{executive_summary_content}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: problem-statement
|
||||
title: Problem Statement
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Articulate the problem with clarity and evidence. Address:
|
||||
- Current state and pain points
|
||||
- Impact of the problem (quantify if possible)
|
||||
- Why existing solutions fall short
|
||||
- Urgency and importance of solving this now
|
||||
template: "{{detailed_problem_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: proposed-solution
|
||||
title: Proposed Solution
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the solution approach at a high level. Include:
|
||||
- Core concept and approach
|
||||
- Key differentiators from existing solutions
|
||||
- Why this solution will succeed where others haven't
|
||||
- High-level vision for the product
|
||||
template: "{{solution_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: target-users
|
||||
title: Target Users
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define and characterize the intended users with specificity. For each user segment include:
|
||||
- Demographic/firmographic profile
|
||||
- Current behaviors and workflows
|
||||
- Specific needs and pain points
|
||||
- Goals they're trying to achieve
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: primary-segment
|
||||
title: "Primary User Segment: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
template: "{{primary_user_description}}"
|
||||
- id: secondary-segment
|
||||
title: "Secondary User Segment: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
condition: Has secondary user segment
|
||||
template: "{{secondary_user_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: goals-metrics
|
||||
title: Goals & Success Metrics
|
||||
instruction: Establish clear objectives and how to measure success. Make goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: business-objectives
|
||||
title: Business Objectives
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{objective_with_metric}}"
|
||||
- id: user-success-metrics
|
||||
title: User Success Metrics
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{user_metric}}"
|
||||
- id: kpis
|
||||
title: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{kpi}}: {{definition_and_target}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: mvp-scope
|
||||
title: MVP Scope
|
||||
instruction: Define the minimum viable product clearly. Be specific about what's in and what's out. Help user distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: core-features
|
||||
title: Core Features (Must Have)
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- **{{feature}}:** {{description_and_rationale}}"
|
||||
- id: out-of-scope
|
||||
title: Out of Scope for MVP
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{feature_or_capability}}"
|
||||
- id: mvp-success-criteria
|
||||
title: MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
template: "{{mvp_success_definition}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: post-mvp-vision
|
||||
title: Post-MVP Vision
|
||||
instruction: Outline the longer-term product direction without overcommitting to specifics
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: phase-2-features
|
||||
title: Phase 2 Features
|
||||
template: "{{next_priority_features}}"
|
||||
- id: long-term-vision
|
||||
title: Long-term Vision
|
||||
template: "{{one_two_year_vision}}"
|
||||
- id: expansion-opportunities
|
||||
title: Expansion Opportunities
|
||||
template: "{{potential_expansions}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technical-considerations
|
||||
title: Technical Considerations
|
||||
instruction: Document known technical constraints and preferences. Note these are initial thoughts, not final decisions.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: platform-requirements
|
||||
title: Platform Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Target Platforms:** {{platforms}}
|
||||
- **Browser/OS Support:** {{specific_requirements}}
|
||||
- **Performance Requirements:** {{performance_specs}}
|
||||
- id: technology-preferences
|
||||
title: Technology Preferences
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Frontend:** {{frontend_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Backend:** {{backend_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Database:** {{database_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Hosting/Infrastructure:** {{infrastructure_preferences}}
|
||||
- id: architecture-considerations
|
||||
title: Architecture Considerations
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Repository Structure:** {{repo_thoughts}}
|
||||
- **Service Architecture:** {{service_thoughts}}
|
||||
- **Integration Requirements:** {{integration_needs}}
|
||||
- **Security/Compliance:** {{security_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: constraints-assumptions
|
||||
title: Constraints & Assumptions
|
||||
instruction: Clearly state limitations and assumptions to set realistic expectations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: constraints
|
||||
title: Constraints
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Budget:** {{budget_info}}
|
||||
- **Timeline:** {{timeline_info}}
|
||||
- **Resources:** {{resource_info}}
|
||||
- **Technical:** {{technical_constraints}}
|
||||
- id: key-assumptions
|
||||
title: Key Assumptions
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{assumption}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: risks-questions
|
||||
title: Risks & Open Questions
|
||||
instruction: Identify unknowns and potential challenges proactively
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-risks
|
||||
title: Key Risks
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- **{{risk}}:** {{description_and_impact}}"
|
||||
- id: open-questions
|
||||
title: Open Questions
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{question}}"
|
||||
- id: research-areas
|
||||
title: Areas Needing Further Research
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{research_topic}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: appendices
|
||||
title: Appendices
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: research-summary
|
||||
title: A. Research Summary
|
||||
condition: Has research findings
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If applicable, summarize key findings from:
|
||||
- Market research
|
||||
- Competitive analysis
|
||||
- User interviews
|
||||
- Technical feasibility studies
|
||||
- id: stakeholder-input
|
||||
title: B. Stakeholder Input
|
||||
condition: Has stakeholder feedback
|
||||
template: "{{stakeholder_feedback}}"
|
||||
- id: references
|
||||
title: C. References
|
||||
template: "{{relevant_links_and_docs}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-actions
|
||||
title: Immediate Actions
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{action_item}}"
|
||||
- id: pm-handoff
|
||||
title: PM Handoff
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This Project Brief provides the full context for {{project_name}}. Please start in 'PRD Generation Mode', review the brief thoroughly to work with the user to create the PRD section by section as the template indicates, asking for any necessary clarification or suggesting improvements.
|
||||
102
bmad-core/templates/qa-gate-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
102
bmad-core/templates/qa-gate-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: qa-gate-template-v1
|
||||
name: Quality Gate Decision
|
||||
version: 1.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: yaml
|
||||
filename: docs/qa/gates/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}-{{story_slug}}.yml
|
||||
title: "Quality Gate: {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Required fields (keep these first)
|
||||
schema: 1
|
||||
story: "{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}"
|
||||
story_title: "{{story_title}}"
|
||||
gate: "{{gate_status}}" # PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED
|
||||
status_reason: "{{status_reason}}" # 1-2 sentence summary of why this gate decision
|
||||
reviewer: "Quinn (Test Architect)"
|
||||
updated: "{{iso_timestamp}}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Always present but only active when WAIVED
|
||||
waiver: { active: false }
|
||||
|
||||
# Issues (if any) - Use fixed severity: low | medium | high
|
||||
top_issues: []
|
||||
|
||||
# Risk summary (from risk-profile task if run)
|
||||
risk_summary:
|
||||
totals: { critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0 }
|
||||
recommendations:
|
||||
must_fix: []
|
||||
monitor: []
|
||||
|
||||
# Examples section using block scalars for clarity
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
with_issues: |
|
||||
top_issues:
|
||||
- id: "SEC-001"
|
||||
severity: high # ONLY: low|medium|high
|
||||
finding: "No rate limiting on login endpoint"
|
||||
suggested_action: "Add rate limiting middleware before production"
|
||||
- id: "TEST-001"
|
||||
severity: medium
|
||||
finding: "Missing integration tests for auth flow"
|
||||
suggested_action: "Add test coverage for critical paths"
|
||||
|
||||
when_waived: |
|
||||
waiver:
|
||||
active: true
|
||||
reason: "Accepted for MVP release - will address in next sprint"
|
||||
approved_by: "Product Owner"
|
||||
|
||||
# ============ Optional Extended Fields ============
|
||||
# Uncomment and use if your team wants more detail
|
||||
|
||||
optional_fields_examples:
|
||||
quality_and_expiry: |
|
||||
quality_score: 75 # 0-100 (optional scoring)
|
||||
expires: "2025-01-26T00:00:00Z" # Optional gate freshness window
|
||||
|
||||
evidence: |
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
tests_reviewed: 15
|
||||
risks_identified: 3
|
||||
trace:
|
||||
ac_covered: [1, 2, 3] # AC numbers with test coverage
|
||||
ac_gaps: [4] # AC numbers lacking coverage
|
||||
|
||||
nfr_validation: |
|
||||
nfr_validation:
|
||||
security: { status: CONCERNS, notes: "Rate limiting missing" }
|
||||
performance: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
|
||||
reliability: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
|
||||
maintainability: { status: PASS, notes: "" }
|
||||
|
||||
history: |
|
||||
history: # Append-only audit trail
|
||||
- at: "2025-01-12T10:00:00Z"
|
||||
gate: FAIL
|
||||
note: "Initial review - missing tests"
|
||||
- at: "2025-01-12T15:00:00Z"
|
||||
gate: CONCERNS
|
||||
note: "Tests added but rate limiting still missing"
|
||||
|
||||
risk_summary: |
|
||||
risk_summary: # From risk-profile task
|
||||
totals:
|
||||
critical: 0
|
||||
high: 0
|
||||
medium: 0
|
||||
low: 0
|
||||
# 'highest' is emitted only when risks exist
|
||||
recommendations:
|
||||
must_fix: []
|
||||
monitor: []
|
||||
|
||||
recommendations: |
|
||||
recommendations:
|
||||
immediate: # Must fix before production
|
||||
- action: "Add rate limiting to auth endpoints"
|
||||
refs: ["api/auth/login.ts:42-68"]
|
||||
future: # Can be addressed later
|
||||
- action: "Consider caching for better performance"
|
||||
refs: ["services/data.service.ts"]
|
||||
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/stories/{{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}.{{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}.md
|
||||
smAgent:
|
||||
editableSections: Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks / Subtasks, Dev Notes, Testing, Change Log
|
||||
sectionSpecificInstructions:
|
||||
"Dev Notes":
|
||||
- Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story
|
||||
- Do not invent information.
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story.
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here.
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks.
|
||||
Testing:
|
||||
- List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to (test file location, test standards, etc)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Story {{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}: {{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: {{ Draft | Approved | InProgress | Review | Done }}
|
||||
|
||||
## Story
|
||||
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},\
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},\
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
{{ Copy of Acceptance Criteria numbered list }}
|
||||
|
||||
## Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Agent Record
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Model Used: {{Agent Model Name/Version}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Debug Log References
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Notes List
|
||||
|
||||
### File List
|
||||
|
||||
## QA Results
|
||||
137
bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
137
bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: story-template-v2
|
||||
name: Story Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/stories/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}.{{story_title_short}}.md
|
||||
title: "Story {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}: {{story_title_short}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
agent_config:
|
||||
editable_sections:
|
||||
- Status
|
||||
- Story
|
||||
- Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
- Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
- Dev Notes
|
||||
- Testing
|
||||
- Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: status
|
||||
title: Status
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
choices: [Draft, Approved, InProgress, Review, Done]
|
||||
instruction: Select the current status of the story
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: story
|
||||
title: Story
|
||||
type: template-text
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
instruction: Define the user story using the standard format with role, action, and benefit
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: acceptance-criteria
|
||||
title: Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
instruction: Copy the acceptance criteria numbered list from the epic file
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks-subtasks
|
||||
title: Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Break down the story into specific tasks and subtasks needed for implementation.
|
||||
Reference applicable acceptance criteria numbers where relevant.
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-notes
|
||||
title: Dev Notes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story:
|
||||
- Do not invent information
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-standards
|
||||
title: Testing
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to:
|
||||
- Test file location
|
||||
- Test standards
|
||||
- Testing frameworks and patterns to use
|
||||
- Any specific testing requirements for this story
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: change-log
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track changes made to this story document
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent, qa-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-agent-record
|
||||
title: Dev Agent Record
|
||||
instruction: This section is populated by the development agent during implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: agent-model
|
||||
title: Agent Model Used
|
||||
template: "{{agent_model_name_version}}"
|
||||
instruction: Record the specific AI agent model and version used for development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: debug-log-references
|
||||
title: Debug Log References
|
||||
instruction: Reference any debug logs or traces generated during development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: completion-notes
|
||||
title: Completion Notes List
|
||||
instruction: Notes about the completion of tasks and any issues encountered
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: file-list
|
||||
title: File List
|
||||
instruction: List all files created, modified, or affected during story implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: qa-results
|
||||
title: QA Results
|
||||
instruction: Results from QA Agent QA review of the completed story implementation
|
||||
owner: qa-agent
|
||||
editors: [qa-agent]
|
||||
@@ -1,219 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Plan Management Utility
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Provides utilities for agents and tasks to interact with workflow plans, check progress, update status, and ensure workflow steps are executed in the appropriate sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Functions
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Check Plan Existence
|
||||
|
||||
Check for workflow plan:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Look for docs/workflow-plan.md (default location)
|
||||
2. Return plan status to user (exists/not exists) - if not exists then HALT.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parse Plan Status
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Extract current progress from the plan document]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Parsing Logic:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Identify Step Structure**:
|
||||
- Look for checkbox lines: `- [ ]` or `- [x]`
|
||||
- Extract step IDs from comments: `<!-- step-id: X.Y -->`
|
||||
- Identify agent assignments: `<!-- agent: pm -->`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Determine Current State**:
|
||||
- Last completed step (highest numbered `[x]`)
|
||||
- Next expected step (first `[ ]` after completed steps)
|
||||
- Overall progress percentage
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Extract Metadata**:
|
||||
- Workflow type from plan header
|
||||
- Decision points and their status
|
||||
- Any deviation notes
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Sequence Validation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check if requested action aligns with plan sequence]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation Rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Strict Mode** (enforceSequence: true):
|
||||
- Must complete steps in exact order
|
||||
- Warn and block if out of sequence
|
||||
- Require explicit override justification
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Flexible Mode** (enforceSequence: false):
|
||||
- Warn about sequence deviation
|
||||
- Allow with confirmation
|
||||
- Log deviation reason
|
||||
|
||||
**Warning Templates:**
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
SEQUENCE WARNING:
|
||||
The workflow plan shows you should complete "{expected_step}" next.
|
||||
You're attempting to: "{requested_action}"
|
||||
|
||||
In strict mode: Block and require plan update
|
||||
In flexible mode: Allow with confirmation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Plan Update Operations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide consistent way to update plan progress]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Update Actions:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Mark Step Complete**:
|
||||
- Change `- [ ]` to `- [x]`
|
||||
- Add completion timestamp comment
|
||||
- Update any status metadata
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Add Deviation Note**:
|
||||
- Insert note explaining why sequence changed
|
||||
- Reference the deviation in plan
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Update Current Step Pointer**:
|
||||
- Add/move `<!-- current-step -->` marker
|
||||
- Update last-modified timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Integration Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: How agents and tasks should use this utility]]
|
||||
|
||||
**For Agents (startup sequence)**:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
1. Check if plan exists using this utility
|
||||
2. If exists:
|
||||
- Parse current status
|
||||
- Show user: "Active workflow plan detected. Current step: {X}"
|
||||
- Suggest: "Next recommended action: {next_step}"
|
||||
3. Continue with normal startup
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For Tasks (pre-execution)**:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
1. Check if plan exists
|
||||
2. If exists:
|
||||
- Verify this task aligns with plan
|
||||
- If not aligned:
|
||||
- In strict mode: Show warning and stop
|
||||
- In flexible mode: Show warning and ask for confirmation
|
||||
3. After task completion:
|
||||
- Update plan if task was a planned step
|
||||
- Add note if task was unplanned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Plan Status Report Format
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Standard format for showing plan status]]
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
📋 Workflow Plan Status
|
||||
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
||||
Workflow: {workflow_name}
|
||||
Progress: {X}% complete ({completed}/{total} steps)
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Completed:
|
||||
- {completed_step_1}
|
||||
- {completed_step_2}
|
||||
|
||||
🔄 Current Step:
|
||||
- {current_step_description}
|
||||
|
||||
📌 Upcoming:
|
||||
- {next_step_1}
|
||||
- {next_step_2}
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ Notes:
|
||||
- {any_deviations_or_notes}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Decision Point Handling
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Special handling for workflow decision points]]
|
||||
|
||||
When encountering a decision point in the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Identify Decision Marker**: `<!-- decision: {decision_id} -->`
|
||||
2. **Check Decision Status**: Made/Pending
|
||||
3. **If Pending**:
|
||||
- Block progress until decision made
|
||||
- Show options to user
|
||||
- Record decision when made
|
||||
4. **If Made**:
|
||||
- Verify current path aligns with decision
|
||||
- Warn if attempting alternate path
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Plan Abandonment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Graceful handling when user wants to stop following plan]]
|
||||
|
||||
If user wants to abandon plan:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Confirm abandonment intent
|
||||
2. Add abandonment note to plan
|
||||
3. Mark plan as "Abandoned" in header
|
||||
4. Stop plan checking for remainder of session
|
||||
5. Suggest creating new plan if needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Agent Startup Check
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
BMad Master starting...
|
||||
|
||||
[Check for plan]
|
||||
Found active workflow plan: brownfield-fullstack
|
||||
Progress: 40% complete (4/10 steps)
|
||||
Current step: Create PRD (pm agent)
|
||||
|
||||
Suggestion: Based on your plan, you should work with the PM agent next.
|
||||
Use *agent pm to switch, or *plan-status to see full progress.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: Task Sequence Warning
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
User: *task create-next-story
|
||||
|
||||
[Plan check triggered]
|
||||
⚠️ SEQUENCE WARNING:
|
||||
Your workflow plan indicates the PRD hasn't been created yet.
|
||||
Creating stories before the PRD may lead to incomplete requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like to:
|
||||
1. Continue anyway (will note deviation in plan)
|
||||
2. Switch to creating PRD first (*agent pm)
|
||||
3. View plan status (*plan-status)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Automatic Plan Update
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
[After completing create-doc task for PRD]
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Plan Updated: Marked "Create PRD" as complete
|
||||
📍 Next step: Create Architecture Document (architect agent)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- This utility should be lightweight and fast
|
||||
- Plan parsing should be resilient to format variations
|
||||
- Always preserve user agency - warnings not blocks (unless strict mode)
|
||||
- Plan updates should be atomic to prevent corruption
|
||||
- Consider plan versioning for rollback capability
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
- Missing plan: Return null, don't error
|
||||
- Malformed plan: Warn but continue, treat as no plan
|
||||
- Update failures: Log but don't block task completion
|
||||
- Parse errors: Fallback to basic text search
|
||||
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ workflow:
|
||||
All stories implemented and reviewed!
|
||||
Project development phase complete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: data#bmad-kb:IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
flow_diagram: |
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ workflow:
|
||||
All stories implemented and reviewed!
|
||||
Project development phase complete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: data#bmad-kb:IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
flow_diagram: |
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ workflow:
|
||||
All stories implemented and reviewed!
|
||||
Project development phase complete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: data#bmad-kb:IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
flow_diagram: |
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ workflow:
|
||||
All stories implemented and reviewed!
|
||||
Project development phase complete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: data#bmad-kb:IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
flow_diagram: |
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ workflow:
|
||||
All stories implemented and reviewed!
|
||||
Project development phase complete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: data#bmad-kb:IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
flow_diagram: |
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,91 +1,101 @@
|
||||
# Create Document from Template Task
|
||||
# Create Document from Template (YAML Driven)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
## ⚠️ CRITICAL EXECUTION NOTICE ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
Generate documents from templates by EXECUTING (not just reading) embedded instructions from the perspective of the selected agent persona.
|
||||
**THIS IS AN EXECUTABLE WORKFLOW - NOT REFERENCE MATERIAL**
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL RULES
|
||||
When this task is invoked:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Templates are PROGRAMS** - Execute every [[LLM:]] instruction exactly as written
|
||||
2. **NEVER show markup** - Hide all [[LLM:]], {{placeholders}}, @{examples}, and template syntax
|
||||
3. **STOP and EXECUTE** - When you see "apply tasks#" or "execute tasks#", STOP and run that task immediately
|
||||
4. **WAIT for user input** - At review points and after elicitation tasks
|
||||
1. **DISABLE ALL EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATIONS** - This workflow requires full user interaction
|
||||
2. **MANDATORY STEP-BY-STEP EXECUTION** - Each section must be processed sequentially with user feedback
|
||||
3. **ELICITATION IS REQUIRED** - When `elicit: true`, you MUST use the 1-9 format and wait for user response
|
||||
4. **NO SHORTCUTS ALLOWED** - Complete documents cannot be created without following this workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
**VIOLATION INDICATOR:** If you create a complete document without user interaction, you have violated this workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Check Workflow Plan (if configured)
|
||||
## Critical: Template Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check if plan tracking is enabled in core-config.yaml]]
|
||||
If a YAML Template has not been provided, list all templates from .bmad-core/templates or ask the user to provide another.
|
||||
|
||||
- If `workflow.trackProgress: true`, check for active plan using {root}/utils/plan-management.md
|
||||
- If plan exists and this document creation is part of the plan:
|
||||
- Verify this is the expected next step
|
||||
- If out of sequence and `enforceSequence: true`, warn user and halt without user override
|
||||
- If out of sequence and `enforceSequence: false`, ask for confirmation
|
||||
- Continue with normal execution after plan check
|
||||
## CRITICAL: Mandatory Elicitation Format
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify Template
|
||||
**When `elicit: true`, this is a HARD STOP requiring user interaction:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Load from `{root}/templates/*.md` or `{root}/templates directory`
|
||||
- Agent-specific templates are listed in agent's dependencies
|
||||
- If agent has `templates: [prd-tmpl, architecture-tmpl]` for example, then offer to create "PRD" and "Architecture" documents
|
||||
**YOU MUST:**
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Ask Interaction Mode
|
||||
1. Present section content
|
||||
2. Provide detailed rationale (explain trade-offs, assumptions, decisions made)
|
||||
3. **STOP and present numbered options 1-9:**
|
||||
- **Option 1:** Always "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
- **Options 2-9:** Select 8 methods from data/elicitation-methods
|
||||
- End with: "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"
|
||||
4. **WAIT FOR USER RESPONSE** - Do not proceed until user selects option or provides feedback
|
||||
|
||||
> 1. **Incremental** - Section by section with reviews
|
||||
> 2. **YOLO Mode** - Complete draft then review (user can type `/yolo` anytime to switch)
|
||||
**WORKFLOW VIOLATION:** Creating content for elicit=true sections without user interaction violates this task.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Execute Template
|
||||
**NEVER ask yes/no questions or use any other format.**
|
||||
|
||||
- Replace {{placeholders}} with real content
|
||||
- Execute [[LLM:]] instructions as you encounter them
|
||||
- Process <<REPEAT>> loops and ^^CONDITIONS^^
|
||||
- Use @{examples} for guidance but never output them
|
||||
## Processing Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Key Execution Patterns
|
||||
1. **Parse YAML template** - Load template metadata and sections
|
||||
2. **Set preferences** - Show current mode (Interactive), confirm output file
|
||||
3. **Process each section:**
|
||||
- Skip if condition unmet
|
||||
- Check agent permissions (owner/editors) - note if section is restricted to specific agents
|
||||
- Draft content using section instruction
|
||||
- Present content + detailed rationale
|
||||
- **IF elicit: true** → MANDATORY 1-9 options format
|
||||
- Save to file if possible
|
||||
4. **Continue until complete**
|
||||
|
||||
**When you see:** `[[LLM: Draft X and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md]]`
|
||||
## Detailed Rationale Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Draft the content
|
||||
- Present it to user
|
||||
- IMMEDIATELY execute the task
|
||||
- Wait for completion before continuing
|
||||
When presenting section content, ALWAYS include rationale that explains:
|
||||
|
||||
**When you see:** `[[LLM: After section completion, apply {root}/tasks/Y.md]]`
|
||||
- Trade-offs and choices made (what was chosen over alternatives and why)
|
||||
- Key assumptions made during drafting
|
||||
- Interesting or questionable decisions that need user attention
|
||||
- Areas that might need validation
|
||||
|
||||
- Finish the section
|
||||
- STOP and execute the task
|
||||
- Wait for user input
|
||||
## Elicitation Results Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Validation & Final Presentation
|
||||
After user selects elicitation method (2-9):
|
||||
|
||||
- Run any specified checklists
|
||||
- Present clean, formatted content only
|
||||
- No truncation or summarization
|
||||
- Begin directly with content (no preamble)
|
||||
- Include any handoff prompts from template
|
||||
1. Execute method from data/elicitation-methods
|
||||
2. Present results with insights
|
||||
3. Offer options:
|
||||
- **1. Apply changes and update section**
|
||||
- **2. Return to elicitation menu**
|
||||
- **3. Ask any questions or engage further with this elicitation**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Update Workflow Plan (if applicable)
|
||||
## Agent Permissions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After successful document creation]]
|
||||
When processing sections with agent permission fields:
|
||||
|
||||
- If plan tracking is enabled and document was part of plan:
|
||||
- Call update-workflow-plan task to mark step complete
|
||||
- Parameters: task: create-doc, step_id: {from plan}, status: complete
|
||||
- Show next recommended step from plan
|
||||
- **owner**: Note which agent role initially creates/populates the section
|
||||
- **editors**: List agent roles allowed to modify the section
|
||||
- **readonly**: Mark sections that cannot be modified after creation
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
|
||||
**For sections with restricted access:**
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Skipping elicitation tasks
|
||||
❌ Showing template markup to users
|
||||
❌ Continuing past STOP signals
|
||||
❌ Combining multiple review points
|
||||
- Include a note in the generated document indicating the responsible agent
|
||||
- Example: "_(This section is owned by dev-agent and can only be modified by dev-agent)_"
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Execute ALL instructions in sequence
|
||||
✅ Present only clean, formatted content
|
||||
✅ Stop at every elicitation point
|
||||
✅ Wait for user confirmation when instructed
|
||||
## YOLO Mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
|
||||
|
||||
Templates contain precise instructions for a reason. Follow them exactly to ensure document quality and completeness.
|
||||
## CRITICAL REMINDERS
|
||||
|
||||
**❌ NEVER:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask yes/no questions for elicitation
|
||||
- Use any format other than 1-9 numbered options
|
||||
- Create new elicitation methods
|
||||
|
||||
**✅ ALWAYS:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use exact 1-9 format when elicit: true
|
||||
- Select options 2-9 from data/elicitation-methods only
|
||||
- Provide detailed rationale explaining decisions
|
||||
- End with "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Create Document from Template (YAML Driven)
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL: Mandatory Elicitation Format
|
||||
|
||||
**When `elicit: true`, ALWAYS use this exact format:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present section content
|
||||
2. Provide detailed rationale (explain trade-offs, assumptions, decisions made)
|
||||
3. Present numbered options 1-9:
|
||||
- **Option 1:** Always "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
- **Options 2-9:** Select 8 methods from data/elicitation-methods
|
||||
- End with: "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER ask yes/no questions or use any other format.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Processing Flow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse YAML template** - Load template metadata and sections
|
||||
2. **Set preferences** - Show current mode (Interactive), confirm output file
|
||||
3. **Process each section:**
|
||||
- Skip if condition unmet
|
||||
- Draft content using section instruction
|
||||
- Present content + detailed rationale
|
||||
- **IF elicit: true** → MANDATORY 1-9 options format
|
||||
- Save to file if possible
|
||||
4. **Continue until complete**
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Rationale Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
When presenting section content, ALWAYS include rationale that explains:
|
||||
|
||||
- Trade-offs and choices made (what was chosen over alternatives and why)
|
||||
- Key assumptions made during drafting
|
||||
- Interesting or questionable decisions that need user attention
|
||||
- Areas that might need validation
|
||||
|
||||
## Elicitation Results Flow
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects elicitation method (2-9):
|
||||
|
||||
1. Execute method from data/elicitation-methods
|
||||
2. Present results with insights
|
||||
3. Offer options:
|
||||
- **1. Apply changes and update section**
|
||||
- **2. Return to elicitation menu**
|
||||
- **3. Ask any questions or engage further with this elicitation**
|
||||
|
||||
## YOLO Mode
|
||||
|
||||
User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL REMINDERS
|
||||
|
||||
**❌ NEVER:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask yes/no questions for elicitation
|
||||
- Use any format other than 1-9 numbered options
|
||||
- Create new elicitation methods
|
||||
|
||||
**✅ ALWAYS:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use exact 1-9 format when elicit: true
|
||||
- Select options 2-9 from data/elicitation-methods only
|
||||
- Provide detailed rationale explaining decisions
|
||||
- End with "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initial Assessment**
|
||||
|
||||
- If user or the task being run provides a checklist name:
|
||||
- Try fuzzy matching (e.g. "architecture checklist" -> "architect-checklist")
|
||||
- If multiple matches found, ask user to clarify
|
||||
@@ -22,14 +21,12 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- All at once (YOLO mode - recommended for checklists, there will be a summary of sections at the end to discuss)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Document and Artifact Gathering**
|
||||
|
||||
- Each checklist will specify its required documents/artifacts at the beginning
|
||||
- Follow the checklist's specific instructions for what to gather, generally a file can be resolved in the docs folder, if not or unsure, halt and ask or confirm with the user.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Checklist Processing**
|
||||
|
||||
If in interactive mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Work through each section of the checklist one at a time
|
||||
- For each section:
|
||||
- Review all items in the section following instructions for that section embedded in the checklist
|
||||
@@ -38,7 +35,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- Get user confirmation before proceeding to next section or if any thing major do we need to halt and take corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
If in YOLO mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Process all sections at once
|
||||
- Create a comprehensive report of all findings
|
||||
- Present the complete analysis to the user
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +42,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
4. **Validation Approach**
|
||||
|
||||
For each checklist item:
|
||||
|
||||
- Read and understand the requirement
|
||||
- Look for evidence in the documentation that satisfies the requirement
|
||||
- Consider both explicit mentions and implicit coverage
|
||||
@@ -60,7 +55,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
5. **Section Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
For each section:
|
||||
|
||||
- think step by step to calculate pass rate
|
||||
- Identify common themes in failed items
|
||||
- Provide specific recommendations for improvement
|
||||
@@ -70,7 +64,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
6. **Final Report**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare a summary that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- Overall checklist completion status
|
||||
- Pass rates by section
|
||||
- List of failed items with context
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ sections:
|
||||
- **repeatable**: Boolean - Section can be repeated multiple times
|
||||
- **condition**: String - Condition for including section (e.g., "has ui requirements")
|
||||
|
||||
#### Agent Permissions
|
||||
|
||||
- **owner**: String - Agent role that initially creates/populates this section
|
||||
- **editors**: Array - List of agent roles allowed to modify this section
|
||||
- **readonly**: Boolean - Section cannot be modified after initial creation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
- **examples**: Array of example content (not included in output)
|
||||
@@ -169,6 +175,29 @@ choices:
|
||||
- `block` - Block diagrams
|
||||
- `kanban` - Kanban boards
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Permissions Example
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
- id: story-details
|
||||
title: Story
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
readonly: false
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: dev-notes
|
||||
title: Dev Notes
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
readonly: false
|
||||
instruction: Implementation notes and technical details
|
||||
- id: qa-results
|
||||
title: QA Results
|
||||
owner: qa-agent
|
||||
editors: [qa-agent]
|
||||
readonly: true
|
||||
instruction: Quality assurance test results
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Repeatable Sections
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Template Format Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
Templates in the BMad method use standardized markup for AI processing. These conventions ensure consistent document generation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Markup Elements
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{placeholders}}**: Variables to be replaced with actual content
|
||||
- **[[LLM: instructions]]**: Internal processing instructions for AI agents (never shown to users)
|
||||
- **REPEAT** sections: Content blocks that may be repeated as needed
|
||||
- **^^CONDITION^^** blocks: Conditional content included only if criteria are met
|
||||
- **@{examples}**: Example content for guidance (never output to users)
|
||||
|
||||
## Processing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Replace all {{placeholders}} with project-specific content
|
||||
- Execute all [[LLM: instructions]] internally without showing users
|
||||
- Process conditional and repeat blocks as specified
|
||||
- Use examples for guidance but never include them in final output
|
||||
- Present only clean, formatted content to users
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **NEVER display template markup, LLM instructions, or examples to users**
|
||||
- Template elements are for AI processing only
|
||||
- Focus on faithful template execution and clean output
|
||||
- All template-specific instructions are embedded within templates
|
||||
2241
dist/agents/analyst.txt
vendored
2241
dist/agents/analyst.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
4997
dist/agents/architect.txt
vendored
4997
dist/agents/architect.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
9507
dist/agents/bmad-master.txt
vendored
9507
dist/agents/bmad-master.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
1060
dist/agents/bmad-orchestrator.txt
vendored
1060
dist/agents/bmad-orchestrator.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
50
dist/agents/dev.txt
vendored
50
dist/agents/dev.txt
vendored
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ These references map directly to bundle sections:
|
||||
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, follow startup section instructions, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: James
|
||||
id: dev
|
||||
@@ -52,11 +57,6 @@ agent:
|
||||
icon: 💻
|
||||
whenToUse: Use for code implementation, debugging, refactoring, and development best practices
|
||||
customization: null
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Announce: Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Read the following full files as these are your explicit rules for development standards for this project - .bmad-core/core-config.yaml devLoadAlwaysFiles list
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT load any other files during startup aside from the assigned story and devLoadAlwaysFiles items, unless user requested you do or the following contradicts
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Do NOT begin development until a story is not in draft mode and you are told to proceed
|
||||
persona:
|
||||
role: Expert Senior Software Engineer & Implementation Specialist
|
||||
style: Extremely concise, pragmatic, detail-oriented, solution-focused
|
||||
@@ -72,21 +72,21 @@ commands:
|
||||
- run-tests: Execute linting and tests
|
||||
- explain: teach me what and why you did whatever you just did in detail so I can learn. Explain to me as if you were training a junior engineer.
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Developer, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
develop-story:
|
||||
order-of-execution: Read (first or next) task→Implement Task and its subtasks→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass, then update the task checkbox with [x]→Update story section File List to ensure it lists and new or modified or deleted source file→repeat order-of-execution until complete
|
||||
story-file-updates-ONLY:
|
||||
- CRITICAL: ONLY UPDATE THE STORY FILE WITH UPDATES TO SECTIONS INDICATED BELOW. DO NOT MODIFY ANY OTHER SECTIONS.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: You are ONLY authorized to edit these specific sections of story files - Tasks / Subtasks Checkboxes, Dev Agent Record section and all its subsections, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List, Change Log, Status
|
||||
- CRITICAL: DO NOT modify Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, Testing sections, or any other sections not listed above
|
||||
blocking: 'HALT for: Unapproved deps needed, confirm with user | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures attempting to implement or fix something repeatedly | Missing config | Failing regression'
|
||||
ready-for-review: Code matches requirements + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete
|
||||
completion: 'All Tasks and Subtasks marked [x] and have tests→Validations and full regression passes (DON''T BE LAZY, EXECUTE ALL TESTS and CONFIRM)→Ensure File List is Complete→run the task execute-checklist for the checklist story-dod-checklist→set story status: ''Ready for Review''→HALT'
|
||||
- develop-story:
|
||||
- order-of-execution: Read (first or next) task→Implement Task and its subtasks→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass, then update the task checkbox with [x]→Update story section File List to ensure it lists and new or modified or deleted source file→repeat order-of-execution until complete
|
||||
- story-file-updates-ONLY:
|
||||
- CRITICAL: ONLY UPDATE THE STORY FILE WITH UPDATES TO SECTIONS INDICATED BELOW. DO NOT MODIFY ANY OTHER SECTIONS.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: You are ONLY authorized to edit these specific sections of story files - Tasks / Subtasks Checkboxes, Dev Agent Record section and all its subsections, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List, Change Log, Status
|
||||
- CRITICAL: DO NOT modify Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, Testing sections, or any other sections not listed above
|
||||
- blocking: 'HALT for: Unapproved deps needed, confirm with user | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures attempting to implement or fix something repeatedly | Missing config | Failing regression'
|
||||
- ready-for-review: Code matches requirements + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete
|
||||
- completion: 'All Tasks and Subtasks marked [x] and have tests→Validations and full regression passes (DON''T BE LAZY, EXECUTE ALL TESTS and CONFIRM)→Ensure File List is Complete→run the task execute-checklist for the checklist story-dod-checklist→set story status: ''Ready for Review''→HALT'
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- validate-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- validate-next-story.md
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/agents/dev.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initial Assessment**
|
||||
|
||||
- If user or the task being run provides a checklist name:
|
||||
- Try fuzzy matching (e.g. "architecture checklist" -> "architect-checklist")
|
||||
- If multiple matches found, ask user to clarify
|
||||
@@ -115,14 +114,12 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- All at once (YOLO mode - recommended for checklists, there will be a summary of sections at the end to discuss)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Document and Artifact Gathering**
|
||||
|
||||
- Each checklist will specify its required documents/artifacts at the beginning
|
||||
- Follow the checklist's specific instructions for what to gather, generally a file can be resolved in the docs folder, if not or unsure, halt and ask or confirm with the user.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Checklist Processing**
|
||||
|
||||
If in interactive mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Work through each section of the checklist one at a time
|
||||
- For each section:
|
||||
- Review all items in the section following instructions for that section embedded in the checklist
|
||||
@@ -131,7 +128,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- Get user confirmation before proceeding to next section or if any thing major do we need to halt and take corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
If in YOLO mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Process all sections at once
|
||||
- Create a comprehensive report of all findings
|
||||
- Present the complete analysis to the user
|
||||
@@ -139,7 +135,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
4. **Validation Approach**
|
||||
|
||||
For each checklist item:
|
||||
|
||||
- Read and understand the requirement
|
||||
- Look for evidence in the documentation that satisfies the requirement
|
||||
- Consider both explicit mentions and implicit coverage
|
||||
@@ -153,7 +148,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
5. **Section Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
For each section:
|
||||
|
||||
- think step by step to calculate pass rate
|
||||
- Identify common themes in failed items
|
||||
- Provide specific recommendations for improvement
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +157,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
6. **Final Report**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare a summary that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- Overall checklist completion status
|
||||
- Pass rates by section
|
||||
- List of failed items with context
|
||||
@@ -197,7 +190,7 @@ To comprehensively validate a story draft before implementation begins, ensuring
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Load Core Configuration and Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml` from the project root
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml`
|
||||
- If the file does not exist, HALT and inform the user: "core-config.yaml not found. This file is required for story validation."
|
||||
- Extract key configurations: `devStoryLocation`, `prd.*`, `architecture.*`
|
||||
- Identify and load the following inputs:
|
||||
@@ -351,14 +344,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
1. **Requirements Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Be specific - list each requirement and whether it's complete]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All functional requirements specified in the story are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All acceptance criteria defined in the story are met.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Coding Standards & Project Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Code quality matters for maintainability. Check each item carefully]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All new/modified code strictly adheres to `Operational Guidelines`.
|
||||
- [ ] All new/modified code aligns with `Project Structure` (file locations, naming, etc.).
|
||||
- [ ] Adherence to `Tech Stack` for technologies/versions used (if story introduces or modifies tech usage).
|
||||
@@ -370,7 +361,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
3. **Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Testing proves your code works. Be honest about test coverage]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All required unit tests as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All required integration tests (if applicable) as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
|
||||
- [ ] All tests (unit, integration, E2E if applicable) pass successfully.
|
||||
@@ -379,14 +369,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
4. **Functionality & Verification:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Did you actually run and test your code? Be specific about what you tested]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Functionality has been manually verified by the developer (e.g., running the app locally, checking UI, testing API endpoints).
|
||||
- [ ] Edge cases and potential error conditions considered and handled gracefully.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Story Administration:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Documentation helps the next developer. What should they know?]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All tasks within the story file are marked as complete.
|
||||
- [ ] Any clarifications or decisions made during development are documented in the story file or linked appropriately.
|
||||
- [ ] The story wrap up section has been completed with notes of changes or information relevant to the next story or overall project, the agent model that was primarily used during development, and the changelog of any changes is properly updated.
|
||||
@@ -394,7 +382,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
6. **Dependencies, Build & Configuration:**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Build issues block everyone. Ensure everything compiles and runs cleanly]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Project builds successfully without errors.
|
||||
- [ ] Project linting passes
|
||||
- [ ] Any new dependencies added were either pre-approved in the story requirements OR explicitly approved by the user during development (approval documented in story file).
|
||||
@@ -405,7 +392,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
|
||||
7. **Documentation (If Applicable):**
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Good documentation prevents future confusion. What needs explaining?]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Relevant inline code documentation (e.g., JSDoc, TSDoc, Python docstrings) for new public APIs or complex logic is complete.
|
||||
- [ ] User-facing documentation updated, if changes impact users.
|
||||
- [ ] Technical documentation (e.g., READMEs, system diagrams) updated if significant architectural changes were made.
|
||||
|
||||
1249
dist/agents/pm.txt
vendored
1249
dist/agents/pm.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
621
dist/agents/po.txt
vendored
621
dist/agents/po.txt
vendored
@@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
|
||||
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
|
||||
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
agent:
|
||||
name: Sarah
|
||||
id: po
|
||||
@@ -73,35 +73,28 @@ persona:
|
||||
- User Collaboration for Validation - Seek input at critical checkpoints
|
||||
- Focus on Executable & Value-Driven Increments - Ensure work aligns with MVP goals
|
||||
- Documentation Ecosystem Integrity - Maintain consistency across all documents
|
||||
startup:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
commands:
|
||||
- help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
|
||||
- create-doc {template}: execute task create-doc (no template = ONLY show available templates listed under dependencies/templates below)
|
||||
- execute-checklist {checklist}: Run task execute-checklist (default->po-master-checklist)
|
||||
- execute-checklist-po: Run task execute-checklist (checklist po-master-checklist)
|
||||
- shard-doc {document} {destination}: run the task shard-doc against the optionally provided document to the specified destination
|
||||
- correct-course: execute the correct-course task
|
||||
- create-epic: Create epic for brownfield projects (task brownfield-create-epic)
|
||||
- create-story: Create user story from requirements (task brownfield-create-story)
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- doc-out: Output full document to current destination file
|
||||
- validate-story-draft {story}: run the task validate-next-story against the provided story file
|
||||
- yolo: Toggle Yolo Mode off on - on will skip doc section confirmations
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- validate-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- validate-next-story.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- po-master-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- po-master-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/agents/po.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,7 +110,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initial Assessment**
|
||||
|
||||
- If user or the task being run provides a checklist name:
|
||||
- Try fuzzy matching (e.g. "architecture checklist" -> "architect-checklist")
|
||||
- If multiple matches found, ask user to clarify
|
||||
@@ -130,14 +122,12 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- All at once (YOLO mode - recommended for checklists, there will be a summary of sections at the end to discuss)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Document and Artifact Gathering**
|
||||
|
||||
- Each checklist will specify its required documents/artifacts at the beginning
|
||||
- Follow the checklist's specific instructions for what to gather, generally a file can be resolved in the docs folder, if not or unsure, halt and ask or confirm with the user.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Checklist Processing**
|
||||
|
||||
If in interactive mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Work through each section of the checklist one at a time
|
||||
- For each section:
|
||||
- Review all items in the section following instructions for that section embedded in the checklist
|
||||
@@ -146,7 +136,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
- Get user confirmation before proceeding to next section or if any thing major do we need to halt and take corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
If in YOLO mode:
|
||||
|
||||
- Process all sections at once
|
||||
- Create a comprehensive report of all findings
|
||||
- Present the complete analysis to the user
|
||||
@@ -154,7 +143,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
4. **Validation Approach**
|
||||
|
||||
For each checklist item:
|
||||
|
||||
- Read and understand the requirement
|
||||
- Look for evidence in the documentation that satisfies the requirement
|
||||
- Consider both explicit mentions and implicit coverage
|
||||
@@ -168,7 +156,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
5. **Section Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
For each section:
|
||||
|
||||
- think step by step to calculate pass rate
|
||||
- Identify common themes in failed items
|
||||
- Provide specific recommendations for improvement
|
||||
@@ -178,7 +165,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
|
||||
6. **Final Report**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare a summary that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- Overall checklist completion status
|
||||
- Pass rates by section
|
||||
- List of failed items with context
|
||||
@@ -212,20 +198,20 @@ The LLM will:
|
||||
|
||||
## Primary Method: Automatic with markdown-tree
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
|
||||
[[LLM: First, check if markdownExploder is set to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml. If it is, attempt to run the command: `md-tree explode {input file} {output path}`.
|
||||
|
||||
If the command succeeds, inform the user that the document has been sharded successfully and STOP - do not proceed further.
|
||||
|
||||
If the command fails (especially with an error indicating the command is not found or not available), inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is enabled but the md-tree command is not available. Please either:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
|
||||
2. Or set markdownExploder to false in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
2. Or set markdownExploder to false in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: STOP HERE - do not proceed with manual sharding until one of the above actions is taken.**"
|
||||
|
||||
If markdownExploder is set to false, inform the user: "The markdownExploder setting is currently false. For better performance and reliability, you should:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set markdownExploder to true in bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
1. Set markdownExploder to true in .bmad-core/core-config.yaml
|
||||
2. Install @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser globally with: `npm install -g @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser`
|
||||
|
||||
I will now proceed with the manual sharding process."
|
||||
@@ -265,8 +251,6 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
|
||||
|
||||
## Manual Method (if @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser is not available or user indicated manual method)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only proceed with the manual instructions below if the user cannot or does not want to use @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify Document and Target Location
|
||||
@@ -277,7 +261,7 @@ If the user has @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser installed, use it and skip the manu
|
||||
|
||||
2. Parse and Extract Sections
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: When sharding the document:
|
||||
CRITICAL AEGNT SHARDING RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read the entire document content
|
||||
2. Identify all level 2 sections (## headings)
|
||||
@@ -297,13 +281,11 @@ CRITICAL: Use proper parsing that understands markdown context. A ## inside a co
|
||||
For each extracted section:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Generate filename**: Convert the section heading to lowercase-dash-case
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove special characters
|
||||
- Replace spaces with dashes
|
||||
- Example: "## Tech Stack" → `tech-stack.md`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Adjust heading levels**:
|
||||
|
||||
- The level 2 heading becomes level 1 (# instead of ##) in the sharded new document
|
||||
- All subsection levels decrease by 1:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -338,8 +320,6 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Preserve Special Content
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Pay special attention to preserving:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code blocks**: Must capture complete blocks including:
|
||||
|
||||
```language
|
||||
@@ -361,7 +341,7 @@ Create an `index.md` file in the sharded folder that:
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Links and references**: Keep all markdown links intact
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} or [[LLM instructions]], preserve exactly]]
|
||||
7. **Template markup**: If documents contain {{placeholders}} ,preserve exactly
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Validation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -400,9 +380,9 @@ Document sharded successfully:
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `change-checklist`.
|
||||
- Guide a structured response to a change trigger using the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
|
||||
- Analyze the impacts of the change on epics, project artifacts, and the MVP, guided by the checklist's structure.
|
||||
- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, rescope features) as prompted by the checklist.
|
||||
- Explore potential solutions (e.g., adjust scope, rollback elements, re-scope features) as prompted by the checklist.
|
||||
- Draft specific, actionable proposed updates to any affected project artifacts (e.g., epics, user stories, PRD sections, architecture document sections) based on the analysis.
|
||||
- Produce a consolidated "Sprint Change Proposal" document that contains the impact analysis and the clearly drafted proposed edits for user review and approval.
|
||||
- Ensure a clear handoff path if the nature of the changes necessitates fundamental replanning by other core agents (like PM or Architect).
|
||||
@@ -414,19 +394,16 @@ Document sharded successfully:
|
||||
- **Acknowledge Task & Inputs:**
|
||||
- Confirm with the user that the "Correct Course Task" (Change Navigation & Integration) is being initiated.
|
||||
- Verify the change trigger and ensure you have the user's initial explanation of the issue and its perceived impact.
|
||||
- Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `change-checklist` (e.g., `change-checklist`).
|
||||
- Confirm access to all relevant project artifacts (e.g., PRD, Epics/Stories, Architecture Documents, UI/UX Specifications) and, critically, the `.bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist`.
|
||||
- **Establish Interaction Mode:**
|
||||
- Ask the user their preferred interaction mode for this task:
|
||||
- **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the `change-checklist` section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
|
||||
- **"Incrementally (Default & Recommended):** Shall we work through the change-checklist section by section, discussing findings and collaboratively drafting proposed changes for each relevant part before moving to the next? This allows for detailed, step-by-step refinement."
|
||||
- **"YOLO Mode (Batch Processing):** Or, would you prefer I conduct a more batched analysis based on the checklist and then present a consolidated set of findings and proposed changes for a broader review? This can be quicker for initial assessment but might require more extensive review of the combined proposals."
|
||||
- Request the user to select their preferred mode.
|
||||
- Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode (e.g., "Okay, we will proceed in Incremental mode."). This chosen mode will govern how subsequent steps in this task are executed.
|
||||
- **Explain Process:** Briefly inform the user: "We will now use the `change-checklist` to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
|
||||
<rule>When asking multiple questions or presenting multiple points for user input at once, number them clearly (e.g., 1., 2a., 2b.) to make it easier for the user to provide specific responses.</rule>
|
||||
- Once the user chooses, confirm the selected mode and then inform the user: "We will now use the change-checklist to analyze the change and draft proposed updates. I will guide you through the checklist items based on our chosen interaction mode."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Execute Checklist Analysis (Iteratively or Batched, per Interaction Mode)
|
||||
|
||||
- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the `change-checklist` (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
|
||||
- Systematically work through Sections 1-4 of the change-checklist (typically covering Change Context, Epic/Story Impact Analysis, Artifact Conflict Resolution, and Path Evaluation/Recommendation).
|
||||
- For each checklist item or logical group of items (depending on interaction mode):
|
||||
- Present the relevant prompt(s) or considerations from the checklist to the user.
|
||||
- Request necessary information and actively analyze the relevant project artifacts (PRD, epics, architecture documents, story history, etc.) to assess the impact.
|
||||
@@ -449,7 +426,7 @@ Document sharded successfully:
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate "Sprint Change Proposal" with Edits
|
||||
|
||||
- Synthesize the complete `change-checklist` analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the `change-checklist` (Proposal Components).
|
||||
- Synthesize the complete change-checklist analysis (covering findings from Sections 1-4) and all the agreed-upon proposed edits (from Instruction 3) into a single document titled "Sprint Change Proposal." This proposal should align with the structure suggested by Section 5 of the change-checklist.
|
||||
- The proposal must clearly present:
|
||||
- **Analysis Summary:** A concise overview of the original issue, its analyzed impact (on epics, artifacts, MVP scope), and the rationale for the chosen path forward.
|
||||
- **Specific Proposed Edits:** For each affected artifact, clearly show or describe the exact changes (e.g., "Change Story X.Y from: [old text] To: [new text]", "Add new Acceptance Criterion to Story A.B: [new AC]", "Update Section 3.2 of Architecture Document as follows: [new/modified text or diagram description]").
|
||||
@@ -466,324 +443,11 @@ Document sharded successfully:
|
||||
## Output Deliverables
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary:** A "Sprint Change Proposal" document (in markdown format). This document will contain:
|
||||
- A summary of the `change-checklist` analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
|
||||
- A summary of the change-checklist analysis (issue, impact, rationale for the chosen path).
|
||||
- Specific, clearly drafted proposed edits for all affected project artifacts.
|
||||
- **Implicit:** An annotated `change-checklist` (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
|
||||
- **Implicit:** An annotated change-checklist (or the record of its completion) reflecting the discussions, findings, and decisions made during the process.
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/correct-course.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/brownfield-create-epic.md ====================
|
||||
# Create Brownfield Epic Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Create a single epic for smaller brownfield enhancements that don't require the full PRD and Architecture documentation process. This task is for isolated features or modifications that can be completed within a focused scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use This Task
|
||||
|
||||
**Use this task when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The enhancement can be completed in 1-3 stories
|
||||
- No significant architectural changes are required
|
||||
- The enhancement follows existing project patterns
|
||||
- Integration complexity is minimal
|
||||
- Risk to existing system is low
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the full brownfield PRD/Architecture process when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The enhancement requires multiple coordinated stories
|
||||
- Architectural planning is needed
|
||||
- Significant integration work is required
|
||||
- Risk assessment and mitigation planning is necessary
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Project Analysis (Required)
|
||||
|
||||
Before creating the epic, gather essential information about the existing project:
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing Project Context:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Project purpose and current functionality understood
|
||||
- [ ] Existing technology stack identified
|
||||
- [ ] Current architecture patterns noted
|
||||
- [ ] Integration points with existing system identified
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Enhancement clearly defined and scoped
|
||||
- [ ] Impact on existing functionality assessed
|
||||
- [ ] Required integration points identified
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria established
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Epic Creation
|
||||
|
||||
Create a focused epic following this structure:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Epic Title
|
||||
|
||||
{{Enhancement Name}} - Brownfield Enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
#### Epic Goal
|
||||
|
||||
{{1-2 sentences describing what the epic will accomplish and why it adds value}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Epic Description
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing System Context:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current relevant functionality: {{brief description}}
|
||||
- Technology stack: {{relevant existing technologies}}
|
||||
- Integration points: {{where new work connects to existing system}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Details:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What's being added/changed: {{clear description}}
|
||||
- How it integrates: {{integration approach}}
|
||||
- Success criteria: {{measurable outcomes}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Stories
|
||||
|
||||
List 1-3 focused stories that complete the epic:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Story 1:** {{Story title and brief description}}
|
||||
2. **Story 2:** {{Story title and brief description}}
|
||||
3. **Story 3:** {{Story title and brief description}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Existing APIs remain unchanged
|
||||
- [ ] Database schema changes are backward compatible
|
||||
- [ ] UI changes follow existing patterns
|
||||
- [ ] Performance impact is minimal
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Risk:** {{main risk to existing system}}
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** {{how risk will be addressed}}
|
||||
- **Rollback Plan:** {{how to undo changes if needed}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Definition of Done
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All stories completed with acceptance criteria met
|
||||
- [ ] Existing functionality verified through testing
|
||||
- [ ] Integration points working correctly
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation updated appropriately
|
||||
- [ ] No regression in existing features
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before finalizing the epic, ensure:
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope Validation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Epic can be completed in 1-3 stories maximum
|
||||
- [ ] No architectural documentation is required
|
||||
- [ ] Enhancement follows existing patterns
|
||||
- [ ] Integration complexity is manageable
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Assessment:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Risk to existing system is low
|
||||
- [ ] Rollback plan is feasible
|
||||
- [ ] Testing approach covers existing functionality
|
||||
- [ ] Team has sufficient knowledge of integration points
|
||||
|
||||
**Completeness Check:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Epic goal is clear and achievable
|
||||
- [ ] Stories are properly scoped
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||
- [ ] Dependencies are identified
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Handoff to Story Manager
|
||||
|
||||
Once the epic is validated, provide this handoff to the Story Manager:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Story Manager Handoff:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Please develop detailed user stories for this brownfield epic. Key considerations:
|
||||
|
||||
- This is an enhancement to an existing system running {{technology stack}}
|
||||
- Integration points: {{list key integration points}}
|
||||
- Existing patterns to follow: {{relevant existing patterns}}
|
||||
- Critical compatibility requirements: {{key requirements}}
|
||||
- Each story must include verification that existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
|
||||
The epic should maintain system integrity while delivering {{epic goal}}."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
The epic creation is successful when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Enhancement scope is clearly defined and appropriately sized
|
||||
2. Integration approach respects existing system architecture
|
||||
3. Risk to existing functionality is minimized
|
||||
4. Stories are logically sequenced for safe implementation
|
||||
5. Compatibility requirements are clearly specified
|
||||
6. Rollback plan is feasible and documented
|
||||
|
||||
## Important Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- This task is specifically for SMALL brownfield enhancements
|
||||
- If the scope grows beyond 3 stories, consider the full brownfield PRD process
|
||||
- Always prioritize existing system integrity over new functionality
|
||||
- When in doubt about scope or complexity, escalate to full brownfield planning
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/brownfield-create-epic.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/brownfield-create-story.md ====================
|
||||
# Create Brownfield Story Task
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Create a single user story for very small brownfield enhancements that can be completed in one focused development session. This task is for minimal additions or bug fixes that require existing system integration awareness.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use This Task
|
||||
|
||||
**Use this task when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The enhancement can be completed in a single story
|
||||
- No new architecture or significant design is required
|
||||
- The change follows existing patterns exactly
|
||||
- Integration is straightforward with minimal risk
|
||||
- Change is isolated with clear boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
**Use brownfield-create-epic when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The enhancement requires 2-3 coordinated stories
|
||||
- Some design work is needed
|
||||
- Multiple integration points are involved
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the full brownfield PRD/Architecture process when:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The enhancement requires multiple coordinated stories
|
||||
- Architectural planning is needed
|
||||
- Significant integration work is required
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Quick Project Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Gather minimal but essential context about the existing project:
|
||||
|
||||
**Current System Context:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Relevant existing functionality identified
|
||||
- [ ] Technology stack for this area noted
|
||||
- [ ] Integration point(s) clearly understood
|
||||
- [ ] Existing patterns for similar work identified
|
||||
|
||||
**Change Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Specific change clearly defined
|
||||
- [ ] Impact boundaries identified
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria established
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Story Creation
|
||||
|
||||
Create a single focused story following this structure:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Story Title
|
||||
|
||||
{{Specific Enhancement}} - Brownfield Addition
|
||||
|
||||
#### User Story
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user type}},
|
||||
I want {{specific action/capability}},
|
||||
So that {{clear benefit/value}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Story Context
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing System Integration:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Integrates with: {{existing component/system}}
|
||||
- Technology: {{relevant tech stack}}
|
||||
- Follows pattern: {{existing pattern to follow}}
|
||||
- Touch points: {{specific integration points}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. {{Primary functional requirement}}
|
||||
2. {{Secondary functional requirement (if any)}}
|
||||
3. {{Integration requirement}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Requirements:** 4. Existing {{relevant functionality}} continues to work unchanged 5. New functionality follows existing {{pattern}} pattern 6. Integration with {{system/component}} maintains current behavior
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Requirements:** 7. Change is covered by appropriate tests 8. Documentation is updated if needed 9. No regression in existing functionality verified
|
||||
|
||||
#### Technical Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Integration Approach:** {{how it connects to existing system}}
|
||||
- **Existing Pattern Reference:** {{link or description of pattern to follow}}
|
||||
- **Key Constraints:** {{any important limitations or requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Definition of Done
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Functional requirements met
|
||||
- [ ] Integration requirements verified
|
||||
- [ ] Existing functionality regression tested
|
||||
- [ ] Code follows existing patterns and standards
|
||||
- [ ] Tests pass (existing and new)
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation updated if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Risk and Compatibility Check
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimal Risk Assessment:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Risk:** {{main risk to existing system}}
|
||||
- **Mitigation:** {{simple mitigation approach}}
|
||||
- **Rollback:** {{how to undo if needed}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Compatibility Verification:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] No breaking changes to existing APIs
|
||||
- [ ] Database changes (if any) are additive only
|
||||
- [ ] UI changes follow existing design patterns
|
||||
- [ ] Performance impact is negligible
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before finalizing the story, confirm:
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope Validation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Story can be completed in one development session
|
||||
- [ ] Integration approach is straightforward
|
||||
- [ ] Follows existing patterns exactly
|
||||
- [ ] No design or architecture work required
|
||||
|
||||
**Clarity Check:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Story requirements are unambiguous
|
||||
- [ ] Integration points are clearly specified
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria are testable
|
||||
- [ ] Rollback approach is simple
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
The story creation is successful when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Enhancement is clearly defined and appropriately scoped for single session
|
||||
2. Integration approach is straightforward and low-risk
|
||||
3. Existing system patterns are identified and will be followed
|
||||
4. Rollback plan is simple and feasible
|
||||
5. Acceptance criteria include existing functionality verification
|
||||
|
||||
## Important Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- This task is for VERY SMALL brownfield changes only
|
||||
- If complexity grows during analysis, escalate to brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- Always prioritize existing system integrity
|
||||
- When in doubt about integration complexity, use brownfield-create-epic instead
|
||||
- Stories should take no more than 4 hours of focused development work
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/brownfield-create-story.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/tasks/validate-next-story.md ====================
|
||||
# Validate Next Story Task
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -795,7 +459,7 @@ To comprehensively validate a story draft before implementation begins, ensuring
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Load Core Configuration and Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml` from the project root
|
||||
- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml`
|
||||
- If the file does not exist, HALT and inform the user: "core-config.yaml not found. This file is required for story validation."
|
||||
- Extract key configurations: `devStoryLocation`, `prd.*`, `architecture.*`
|
||||
- Identify and load the following inputs:
|
||||
@@ -921,66 +585,145 @@ Provide a structured validation report including:
|
||||
- **Confidence Level**: High/Medium/Low for successful implementation
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/tasks/validate-next-story.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.md ====================
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/stories/{{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}.{{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}.md
|
||||
smAgent:
|
||||
editableSections: Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks / Subtasks, Dev Notes, Testing, Change Log
|
||||
sectionSpecificInstructions:
|
||||
"Dev Notes":
|
||||
- Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story
|
||||
- Do not invent information.
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story.
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here.
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks.
|
||||
Testing:
|
||||
- List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to (test file location, test standards, etc)
|
||||
---
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml ====================
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: story-template-v2
|
||||
name: Story Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/stories/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}.{{story_title_short}}.md
|
||||
title: "Story {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}: {{story_title_short}}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Story {{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}: {{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: {{ Draft | Approved | InProgress | Review | Done }}
|
||||
agent_config:
|
||||
editable_sections:
|
||||
- Status
|
||||
- Story
|
||||
- Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
- Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
- Dev Notes
|
||||
- Testing
|
||||
- Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
## Story
|
||||
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},\
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},\
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
{{ Copy of Acceptance Criteria numbered list }}
|
||||
|
||||
## Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Agent Record
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Model Used: {{Agent Model Name/Version}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Debug Log References
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Notes List
|
||||
|
||||
### File List
|
||||
|
||||
## QA Results
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.md ====================
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: status
|
||||
title: Status
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
choices: [Draft, Approved, InProgress, Review, Done]
|
||||
instruction: Select the current status of the story
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: story
|
||||
title: Story
|
||||
type: template-text
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
instruction: Define the user story using the standard format with role, action, and benefit
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: acceptance-criteria
|
||||
title: Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
instruction: Copy the acceptance criteria numbered list from the epic file
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks-subtasks
|
||||
title: Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Break down the story into specific tasks and subtasks needed for implementation.
|
||||
Reference applicable acceptance criteria numbers where relevant.
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-notes
|
||||
title: Dev Notes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story:
|
||||
- Do not invent information
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-standards
|
||||
title: Testing
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to:
|
||||
- Test file location
|
||||
- Test standards
|
||||
- Testing frameworks and patterns to use
|
||||
- Any specific testing requirements for this story
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: change-log
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track changes made to this story document
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent, qa-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-agent-record
|
||||
title: Dev Agent Record
|
||||
instruction: This section is populated by the development agent during implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: agent-model
|
||||
title: Agent Model Used
|
||||
template: "{{agent_model_name_version}}"
|
||||
instruction: Record the specific AI agent model and version used for development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: debug-log-references
|
||||
title: Debug Log References
|
||||
instruction: Reference any debug logs or traces generated during development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: completion-notes
|
||||
title: Completion Notes List
|
||||
instruction: Notes about the completion of tasks and any issues encountered
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: file-list
|
||||
title: File List
|
||||
instruction: List all files created, modified, or affected during story implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: qa-results
|
||||
title: QA Results
|
||||
instruction: Results from QA Agent QA review of the completed story implementation
|
||||
owner: qa-agent
|
||||
editors: [qa-agent]
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/checklists/po-master-checklist.md ====================
|
||||
# Product Owner (PO) Master Validation Checklist
|
||||
@@ -993,12 +736,10 @@ PROJECT TYPE DETECTION:
|
||||
First, determine the project type by checking:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is this a GREENFIELD project (new from scratch)?
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for: New project initialization, no existing codebase references
|
||||
- Check for: prd.md, architecture.md, new project setup stories
|
||||
|
||||
2. Is this a BROWNFIELD project (enhancing existing system)?
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for: References to existing codebase, enhancement/modification language
|
||||
- Check for: brownfield-prd.md, brownfield-architecture.md, existing system analysis
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1332,7 +1073,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
|
||||
Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Project type: [Greenfield/Brownfield] with [UI/No UI]
|
||||
- Overall readiness (percentage)
|
||||
- Go/No-Go recommendation
|
||||
@@ -1342,42 +1082,36 @@ Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
|
||||
2. Project-Specific Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
FOR GREENFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Setup completeness
|
||||
- Dependency sequencing
|
||||
- MVP scope appropriateness
|
||||
- Development timeline feasibility
|
||||
|
||||
FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Integration risk level (High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
- Existing system impact assessment
|
||||
- Rollback readiness
|
||||
- User disruption potential
|
||||
|
||||
3. Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
- Top 5 risks by severity
|
||||
- Mitigation recommendations
|
||||
- Timeline impact of addressing issues
|
||||
- [BROWNFIELD] Specific integration risks
|
||||
|
||||
4. MVP Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- Core features coverage
|
||||
- Missing essential functionality
|
||||
- Scope creep identified
|
||||
- True MVP vs over-engineering
|
||||
|
||||
5. Implementation Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- Developer clarity score (1-10)
|
||||
- Ambiguous requirements count
|
||||
- Missing technical details
|
||||
- [BROWNFIELD] Integration point clarity
|
||||
|
||||
6. Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
- Must-fix before development
|
||||
- Should-fix for quality
|
||||
- Consider for improvement
|
||||
@@ -1610,32 +1344,3 @@ Keep it action-oriented and forward-looking.]]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/checklists/change-checklist.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
==================== START: .bmad-core/utils/template-format.md ====================
|
||||
# Template Format Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
Templates in the BMad method use standardized markup for AI processing. These conventions ensure consistent document generation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Markup Elements
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{placeholders}}**: Variables to be replaced with actual content
|
||||
- **[[LLM: instructions]]**: Internal processing instructions for AI agents (never shown to users)
|
||||
- **REPEAT** sections: Content blocks that may be repeated as needed
|
||||
- **^^CONDITION^^** blocks: Conditional content included only if criteria are met
|
||||
- **@{examples}**: Example content for guidance (never output to users)
|
||||
|
||||
## Processing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Replace all {{placeholders}} with project-specific content
|
||||
- Execute all [[LLM: instructions]] internally without showing users
|
||||
- Process conditional and repeat blocks as specified
|
||||
- Use examples for guidance but never include them in final output
|
||||
- Present only clean, formatted content to users
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **NEVER display template markup, LLM instructions, or examples to users**
|
||||
- Template elements are for AI processing only
|
||||
- Focus on faithful template execution and clean output
|
||||
- All template-specific instructions are embedded within templates
|
||||
==================== END: .bmad-core/utils/template-format.md ====================
|
||||
|
||||
2296
dist/agents/qa.txt
vendored
2296
dist/agents/qa.txt
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user