mirror of https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git synced 2026-04-02 18:53:09 +00:00

Files

Arun Kumar Thiagarajan 6eb15a7a3e feat: add 5 gstack-inspired lifecycle commands (critique, review, qa, ship, retro)

Add 5 new core command templates inspired by Garry Tan's GStack to complete
the spec-driven development lifecycle:

- /speckit.critique: Dual-lens product + engineering review before implementation
- /speckit.review: Staff-level code review (correctness, security, performance)
- /speckit.qa: Systematic QA testing (browser-driven and CLI modes)
- /speckit.ship: Release automation (pre-flight, changelog, CI, PR creation)
- /speckit.retro: Sprint retrospective with metrics and improvement suggestions

Each command includes:
- Command template in templates/commands/
- Output report template in templates/
- Extension hook support (before_*/after_*)
- YAML frontmatter with prerequisite scripts

Updated README.md workflow from 6 to 11 steps and added CHANGELOG entry.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

2026-04-01 11:22:57 +05:30

2.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

QA Report: [FEATURE NAME]

QA Mode: [Browser QA / CLI QA / Hybrid] Date: [DATE] Feature: [Link to spec.md] Environment: [OS, browser, runtime versions, application URL] Verdict: [✅ ALL PASSED / ⚠️ PARTIAL PASS / ❌ FAILURES FOUND]

QA Summary

[One-paragraph overview of testing scope, approach, and overall results.]

Test Results

ID	User Story	Scenario	Mode	Result	Evidence
TC-001	[Story]	[Scenario description]	Browser/CLI	✅/❌/⚠️/⏭️	[link to screenshot or output]
TC-002	[Story]	[Scenario description]	Browser/CLI	✅/❌/⚠️/⏭️	[link to screenshot or output]

Legend: ✅ Pass | ❌ Fail | ⚠️ Partial | ⏭️ Skipped

Acceptance Criteria Coverage

Criterion	Test ID(s)	Status	Notes
[AC from spec.md]	TC-001, TC-003	✅ Met
[AC from spec.md]	TC-002	❌ Not Met	[what failed]
[AC from spec.md]	—	⏭️ Not Tested	[reason]

Coverage: [X]/[Y] acceptance criteria validated ([Z]%)

Test Suite Results

Test Suite	Total	Passed	Failed	Skipped	Coverage
[suite name]	[n]	[n]	[n]	[n]	[%]

Failure Details

TC-[ID]: [Scenario Name]

Status: ❌ FAIL Steps to Reproduce:

[Step 1]
[Step 2]
[Step 3]

Expected: [Expected outcome from spec] Actual: [What actually happened] Evidence: [Screenshot path or output capture] Severity: [Critical / High / Medium / Low]

Environment Info

Property	Value
Operating System	[OS version]
Browser	[Browser and version, if applicable]
Runtime	[Node.js/Python/etc. version]
Application URL	[URL, if applicable]
Test Runner	[Tool used]

Metrics Summary

Metric	Value
Total scenarios	[count]
✅ Passed	[count]
❌ Failed	[count]
⚠️ Partial	[count]
⏭️ Skipped	[count]
Pass rate	[%]
Acceptance criteria coverage	[%]

Generated by /speckit.qa — Systematic QA testing for spec-driven development.

2.2 KiB Raw Blame History