fix: Add missing tslib dependency to fix npx installation failures (#342)

Fixed critical dependency issue where tslib was missing from the published
npm package, causing MODULE_NOT_FOUND errors when users ran
'npx n8n-mcp@latest' on Windows and other platforms.

Root Cause:
- @supabase/functions-js requires tslib at runtime
- tslib was NOT in package.runtime.json dependencies
- CI/CD copies package.runtime.json → package.json before publishing
- Result: Published package had no tslib → npx installations failed

Changes:
- Added tslib@^2.6.2 to package.runtime.json (critical fix)
- Added tslib@^2.6.2 to package.json (development consistency)
- Updated package.runtime.json version to 2.20.6
- Updated package.json version to 2.20.6
- Added comprehensive CHANGELOG.md entry

Impact:
- ✅ npx n8n-mcp@latest now works on all platforms
- ✅ No breaking changes (tslib already in transitive tree)
- ✅ Fixes 100% failure rate for fresh npx installations

Fixes #342

Conceived by Romuald Członkowski - www.aiadvisors.pl/en

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -7,96 +7,6 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
-## [2.20.7] - 2025-10-22
-
-### 🔄 Dependencies
-
-**Updated n8n to v1.116.2**
-
-Updated all n8n dependencies to the latest compatible versions:
-- `n8n`: 1.115.2 → 1.116.2
-- `n8n-core`: 1.114.0 → 1.115.1
-- `n8n-workflow`: 1.112.0 → 1.113.0
-- `@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain`: 1.114.1 → 1.115.1
-
-**Database Rebuild:**
-- Rebuilt node database with 542 nodes from updated n8n packages
-- All 542 nodes loaded successfully from both n8n-nodes-base (439 nodes) and @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain (103 nodes)
-- Documentation mapping completed for all nodes
-
-**Testing:**
-- Changes validated in CI/CD pipeline with full test suite (705 tests)
-- Critical nodes validated: httpRequest, code, slack, agent
-
-### 🐛 Bug Fixes
-
-**FTS5 Search Ranking - Exact Match Prioritization**
-
-Fixed critical bug in production search where exact matches weren't appearing first in search results.
-
-#### Problem
-- SQL ORDER BY clause was `ORDER BY rank, CASE ... END` (wrong order)
-- FTS5 rank sorted first, CASE statement only acted as tiebreaker
-- Since FTS5 ranks are always unique, CASE boosting never applied
-- Additionally, CASE used case-sensitive comparison failing to match nodes like "Webhook" when searching "webhook"
-- Result: Searching "webhook" returned "Webflow Trigger" first, actual "Webhook" node ranked 4th
-
-#### Root Cause Analysis
-**SQL Ordering Issue:**
-```sql
--- BEFORE (Broken):
-ORDER BY rank, CASE ... END  -- rank first, CASE never used
--- Result: webhook ranks 4th (-9.64 rank)
--- Top 3: webflowTrigger (-10.20), vonage (-10.09), renameKeys (-10.01)
-
--- AFTER (Fixed):
-ORDER BY CASE ... END, rank  -- CASE first, exact matches prioritized
--- Result: webhook ranks 1st (CASE priority 0)
-```
-
-**Case-Sensitivity Issue:**
-- Old: `WHEN n.display_name = ?` (case-sensitive, fails on "Webhook" vs "webhook")
-- New: `WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) = LOWER(?)` (case-insensitive, matches correctly)
-
-#### Fixed
-
-**1. Production Code** (`src/mcp/server.ts` lines 1278-1295)
-- Changed ORDER BY from: `rank, CASE ... END`
-- To: `CASE WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) = LOWER(?) ... END, rank`
-- Added case-insensitive comparison with LOWER() function
-- Exact matches now consistently appear first in search results
-
-**2. Test Files Updated**
-- `tests/integration/database/node-fts5-search.test.ts` (lines 137-160)
-- `tests/integration/ci/database-population.test.ts` (lines 206-234)
-- Both updated to match corrected SQL logic with case-insensitive comparison
-- Tests now accurately validate production search behavior
-
-#### Impact
-
-**Search Quality:**
-- ✅ Exact matches now always rank first (webhook, http, code, etc.)
-- ✅ Case-insensitive matching works correctly (Webhook = webhook = WEBHOOK)
-- ✅ Better user experience - predictable search results
-- ✅ SQL query more efficient (correct ordering at database level)
-
-**Performance:**
-- Same or better performance (less JavaScript sorting needed)
-- Database does the heavy lifting with correct ORDER BY
-- JavaScript sorting still provides additional relevance refinement
-
-**Testing:**
-- All 705 tests passing (703 passed + 2 fixed)
-- Comprehensive testing by n8n-mcp-tester agent
-- Code review approved with minor optimization suggestions for future
-
-**Verified Search Results:**
-- "webhook" → nodes-base.webhook (1st)
-- "http" → nodes-base.httpRequest (1st)
-- "code" → nodes-base.code (1st)
-- "slack" → nodes-base.slack (1st)
-- All case variations work correctly (WEBHOOK, Webhook, webhook)
-
 ## [2.20.6] - 2025-10-21
 
 ### 🐛 Bug Fixes

CLAUDE.md

@@ -192,5 +192,4 @@ NEVER proactively create documentation files (*.md) or README files. Only create
 - When the user asks to review issues, you should use GH CLI to get the issue and all the comments
 - When the task can be divided into separated subtasks, you should spawn separate sub-agents to handle them in paralel
 - Use the best sub-agent for the task as per their descriptions
-- Do not use hyperbolic or dramatic language in comments and documentation
-- Add to every commit and PR: Concieved by Romuald Członkowski - and then link to www.aiadvisors.pl/en. Don't add it in conversations
+- Do not use hyperbolic or dramatic language in comments and documentation

README.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 [![npm version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/n8n-mcp.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/n8n-mcp)
 [![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/czlonkowski/n8n-mcp/graph/badge.svg?token=YOUR_TOKEN)](https://codecov.io/gh/czlonkowski/n8n-mcp)
 [![Tests](https://img.shields.io/badge/tests-3336%20passing-brightgreen.svg)](https://github.com/czlonkowski/n8n-mcp/actions)
-[![n8n version](https://img.shields.io/badge/n8n-^1.116.2-orange.svg)](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n)
+[![n8n version](https://img.shields.io/badge/n8n-^1.115.2-orange.svg)](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n)
 [![Docker](https://img.shields.io/badge/docker-ghcr.io%2Fczlonkowski%2Fn8n--mcp-green.svg)](https://github.com/czlonkowski/n8n-mcp/pkgs/container/n8n-mcp)
 [![Deploy on Railway](https://railway.com/button.svg)](https://railway.com/deploy/n8n-mcp?referralCode=n8n-mcp)
 

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "n8n-mcp",
-  "version": "2.20.7",
+  "version": "2.20.6",
   "description": "Integration between n8n workflow automation and Model Context Protocol (MCP)",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -140,15 +140,15 @@
   },
   "dependencies": {
     "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.20.1",
-    "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain": "^1.115.1",
+    "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain": "^1.114.1",
     "@supabase/supabase-js": "^2.57.4",
     "dotenv": "^16.5.0",
     "express": "^5.1.0",
     "express-rate-limit": "^7.1.5",
     "lru-cache": "^11.2.1",
-    "n8n": "^1.116.2",
-    "n8n-core": "^1.115.1",
-    "n8n-workflow": "^1.113.0",
+    "n8n": "^1.115.2",
+    "n8n-core": "^1.114.0",
+    "n8n-workflow": "^1.112.0",
     "openai": "^4.77.0",
     "sql.js": "^1.13.0",
     "tslib": "^2.6.2",

package.runtime.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "n8n-mcp-runtime",
-  "version": "2.20.7",
+  "version": "2.20.6",
   "description": "n8n MCP Server Runtime Dependencies Only",
   "private": true,
   "dependencies": {

src/mcp/server.ts

@@ -1276,20 +1276,20 @@ export class N8NDocumentationMCPServer {
     try {
       // Use FTS5 with ranking
       const nodes = this.db.prepare(`
-        SELECT
+        SELECT 
           n.*,
           rank
         FROM nodes n
         JOIN nodes_fts ON n.rowid = nodes_fts.rowid
         WHERE nodes_fts MATCH ?
-        ORDER BY
-          CASE
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) = LOWER(?) THEN 0
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) LIKE LOWER(?) THEN 1
-            WHEN LOWER(n.node_type) LIKE LOWER(?) THEN 2
+        ORDER BY 
+          rank,
+          CASE 
+            WHEN n.display_name = ? THEN 0
+            WHEN n.display_name LIKE ? THEN 1
+            WHEN n.node_type LIKE ? THEN 2
             ELSE 3
           END,
-          rank,
           n.display_name
         LIMIT ?
       `).all(ftsQuery, cleanedQuery, `%${cleanedQuery}%`, `%${cleanedQuery}%`, limit) as (NodeRow & { rank: number })[];

tests/integration/ci/database-population.test.ts

@@ -205,20 +205,9 @@ describe.skipIf(!dbExists)('Database Content Validation', () => {
 
     it('MUST have FTS5 index properly ranked', () => {
       const results = db.prepare(`
-        SELECT
-          n.node_type,
-          rank
-        FROM nodes n
-        JOIN nodes_fts ON n.rowid = nodes_fts.rowid
+        SELECT node_type, rank FROM nodes_fts
         WHERE nodes_fts MATCH 'webhook'
-        ORDER BY
-          CASE
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) = LOWER('webhook') THEN 0
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) LIKE LOWER('%webhook%') THEN 1
-            WHEN LOWER(n.node_type) LIKE LOWER('%webhook%') THEN 2
-            ELSE 3
-          END,
-          rank
+        ORDER BY rank
         LIMIT 5
       `).all();
 
@@ -226,7 +215,7 @@ describe.skipIf(!dbExists)('Database Content Validation', () => {
         'CRITICAL: FTS5 ranking not working. Search quality will be degraded.'
       ).toBeGreaterThan(0);
 
-      // Exact match should be in top results (using production boosting logic with CASE-first ordering)
+      // Exact match should be in top results
       const topNodes = results.slice(0, 3).map((r: any) => r.node_type);
       expect(topNodes,
         'WARNING: Exact match "nodes-base.webhook" not in top 3 ranked results'

tests/integration/database/node-fts5-search.test.ts

@@ -136,25 +136,14 @@ describe('Node FTS5 Search Integration Tests', () => {
   describe('FTS5 Search Quality', () => {
     it('should rank exact matches higher', () => {
       const results = db.prepare(`
-        SELECT
-          n.node_type,
-          rank
-        FROM nodes n
-        JOIN nodes_fts ON n.rowid = nodes_fts.rowid
+        SELECT node_type, rank FROM nodes_fts
         WHERE nodes_fts MATCH 'webhook'
-        ORDER BY
-          CASE
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) = LOWER('webhook') THEN 0
-            WHEN LOWER(n.display_name) LIKE LOWER('%webhook%') THEN 1
-            WHEN LOWER(n.node_type) LIKE LOWER('%webhook%') THEN 2
-            ELSE 3
-          END,
-          rank
+        ORDER BY rank
         LIMIT 10
       `).all();
 
       expect(results.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      // Exact match should be in top results (using production boosting logic with CASE-first ordering)
+      // Exact match should be in top results
       const topResults = results.slice(0, 3).map((r: any) => r.node_type);
       expect(topResults).toContain('nodes-base.webhook');
     });