fix: address code review findings for HTTP Request validation

- Make protocol detection case-insensitive (HTTP://, HTTPS://, Http://)
- Refactor API endpoint detection to prevent false positives
- Add subdomain pattern detection (api.example.com)
- Use regex with word boundaries for path patterns
- Add test coverage for edge cases:
  * Uppercase protocol variants
  * False positive URLs (therapist, restaurant, forest)
  * Case-insensitive API path detection
  * Null/undefined URL handling

All 50 tests passing. Addresses critical issues from PR #366 code review.

Conceived by Romuald Członkowski - www.aiadvisors.pl/en

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -7,6 +7,138 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
+### ✨ Enhancements
+
+**Issue #361: Enhanced HTTP Request Node Validation Suggestions**
+
+Added helpful suggestions for HTTP Request node best practices to prevent common production issues discovered through real-world workflow analysis.
+
+#### What's New
+
+1. **alwaysOutputData Suggestion**
+   - Suggests adding `alwaysOutputData: true` at node level (not in parameters)
+   - Prevents silent workflow failures when HTTP requests error
+   - Ensures downstream error handling can process failed requests
+   - Example suggestion: "Consider adding alwaysOutputData: true at node level for better error handling. This ensures the node produces output even when HTTP requests fail, allowing downstream error handling."
+
+2. **responseFormat Suggestion for API Endpoints**
+   - Suggests setting `options.response.response.responseFormat` for API endpoints
+   - Prevents JSON parsing confusion
+   - Triggered when URL contains `/api`, `/rest`, `supabase`, `firebase`, `googleapis`, or `.com/v` patterns
+   - Example suggestion: "API endpoints should explicitly set options.response.response.responseFormat to 'json' or 'text' to prevent confusion about response parsing"
+
+3. **Enhanced URL Protocol Validation**
+   - Detects missing protocol in expression-based URLs
+   - Warns about patterns like `=www.{{ $json.domain }}.com` (missing http://)
+   - Warns about expressions without protocol: `={{ $json.domain }}/api/data`
+   - Example warning: "URL expression appears to be missing http:// or https:// protocol"
+
+#### Investigation Findings
+
+This enhancement was developed after thorough investigation of issue #361:
+
+**Key Discoveries:**
+- ✅ Mixed expression syntax `=literal{{ expression }}` **actually works in n8n** - the issue report's primary claim was incorrect
+- ✅ Real validation gaps identified: missing `alwaysOutputData` and `responseFormat` checks
+- ✅ Workflow analysis showed "?" icon in UI caused by missing required URL (already caught by validation)
+- ✅ Compared broken vs fixed workflows to identify actual production issues
+
+**Testing Evidence:**
+- Analyzed workflow SwjKJsJhe8OsYfBk with mixed syntax - executions successful
+- Compared broken workflow (mBmkyj460i5rYTG4) with fixed workflow (hQI9pby3nSFtk4TV)
+- Identified that fixed workflow has `alwaysOutputData: true` and explicit `responseFormat: "json"`
+
+#### Impact
+
+- **Non-Breaking**: All changes are suggestions/warnings, not errors
+- **Profile-Aware**: Suggestions shown in all profiles for maximum helpfulness
+- **Actionable**: Clear guidance on how to implement best practices
+- **Production-Focused**: Addresses real workflow reliability concerns from actual broken workflows
+
+#### Test Coverage
+
+Added 8 new test cases covering:
+- alwaysOutputData suggestion for all HTTP Request nodes
+- responseFormat suggestion for API endpoint detection (various patterns)
+- responseFormat NOT suggested when already configured
+- URL protocol validation for expression-based URLs
+- Protocol warnings for missing http:// in expressions
+- No false positives when protocol is correctly included
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Files Modified:**
+- `src/services/enhanced-config-validator.ts` - Added `enhanceHttpRequestValidation()` implementation
+- `tests/unit/services/enhanced-config-validator.test.ts` - Added 8 comprehensive test cases
+
+**Validation Flow:**
+1. Check for alwaysOutputData suggestion (all HTTP Request nodes)
+2. Detect API endpoints by URL patterns
+3. Check for explicit responseFormat configuration
+4. Validate expression-based URLs for protocol issues
+
+#### Related
+
+- **Issue**: #361 - validate_node_operation: Missing critical HTTP Request node configuration checks
+- **Analysis**: Deep investigation with @agent-Explore and @agent-n8n-mcp-tester
+- **Workflows Analyzed**:
+  - SwjKJsJhe8OsYfBk (mixed syntax test)
+  - mBmkyj460i5rYTG4 (broken workflow)
+  - hQI9pby3nSFtk4TV (fixed workflow)
+
+Conceived by Romuald Członkowski - https://www.aiadvisors.pl/en
+
+---
+
+### 🐛 Bug Fixes
+
+**Issue #360: Enhanced Warnings for If/Switch Node Connection Parameters**
+
+Fixed issue where users could unintentionally place multiple If node connections on the same branch (TRUE/FALSE) when using `sourceIndex` parameter instead of the recommended `branch` parameter. The system now provides helpful warnings to guide users toward better practices.
+
+#### What Was Fixed
+
+1. **New Warning System**:
+   - Warns when using `sourceIndex` with If nodes - suggests `branch="true"` or `branch="false"` instead
+   - Warns when using `sourceIndex` with Switch nodes - suggests `case=N` instead
+   - Explains the correct branch structure: `main[0]=TRUE branch, main[1]=FALSE branch`
+
+2. **Enhanced Documentation**:
+   - Added **CRITICAL** pitfalls to `n8n_update_partial_workflow` tool documentation
+   - Clear guidance that using `sourceIndex=0` for multiple connections puts them ALL on the TRUE branch
+   - Examples showing correct vs. incorrect usage
+
+3. **Type System Improvements**:
+   - Added `warnings` field to `WorkflowDiffResult` interface
+   - Warnings are non-blocking (operations still succeed)
+   - Differentiated from errors for better UX
+
+#### Behavior
+
+The existing `branch` parameter works correctly and has comprehensive test coverage:
+- `branch="true"` → routes to `main[0]` (TRUE path)
+- `branch="false"` → routes to `main[1]` (FALSE path)
+
+The issue was that users who didn't know about the `branch` parameter would naturally use `sourceIndex`, which led to incorrect branch routing.
+
+#### Example Warning
+
+```
+Connection to If node "Check Condition" uses sourceIndex=0.
+Consider using branch="true" or branch="false" for better clarity.
+If node outputs: main[0]=TRUE branch, main[1]=FALSE branch.
+```
+
+#### Test Coverage
+
+- Added regression tests that reproduce the exact issue from #360
+- Verify warnings are generated for If and Switch nodes
+- Confirm existing smart parameter tests still pass
+
+**Conceived by Romuald Członkowski - https://www.aiadvisors.pl/en**
+
+---
+
 ### ✨ New Features
 
 **Auto-Update Node Versions with Smart Migration**

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "n8n-mcp",
-  "version": "2.22.0",
+  "version": "2.22.2",
   "description": "Integration between n8n workflow automation and Model Context Protocol (MCP)",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",

src/mcp/handlers-workflow-diff.ts

@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ export async function handleUpdatePartialWorkflow(
           error: 'Failed to apply diff operations',
           details: {
             errors: diffResult.errors,
+            warnings: diffResult.warnings,
             operationsApplied: diffResult.operationsApplied,
             applied: diffResult.applied,
             failed: diffResult.failed
@@ -154,6 +155,9 @@ export async function handleUpdatePartialWorkflow(
         data: {
           valid: true,
           operationsToApply: input.operations.length
+        },
+        details: {
+          warnings: diffResult.warnings
         }
       };
     }
@@ -252,7 +256,8 @@ export async function handleUpdatePartialWorkflow(
           workflowName: updatedWorkflow.name,
           applied: diffResult.applied,
           failed: diffResult.failed,
-          errors: diffResult.errors
+          errors: diffResult.errors,
+          warnings: diffResult.warnings
         }
       };
     } catch (error) {

src/mcp/tool-docs/workflow_management/n8n-update-partial-workflow.ts

@@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ Please choose a different name.
       'Use "updates" property for updateNode operations: {type: "updateNode", updates: {...}}',
       'Smart parameters (branch, case) only work with IF and Switch nodes - ignored for other node types',
       'Explicit sourceIndex overrides smart parameters (branch, case) if both provided',
+      '**CRITICAL**: For If nodes, ALWAYS use branch="true"/"false" instead of sourceIndex. Using sourceIndex=0 for multiple connections will put them ALL on the TRUE branch (main[0]), breaking your workflow logic!',
+      '**CRITICAL**: For Switch nodes, ALWAYS use case=N instead of sourceIndex. Using same sourceIndex for multiple connections will put them on the same case output.',
       'cleanStaleConnections removes ALL broken connections - cannot be selective',
       'replaceConnections overwrites entire connections object - all previous connections lost',
       '**Auto-sanitization behavior**: Binary operators (equals, contains) automatically have singleValue removed; unary operators (isEmpty, isNotEmpty) automatically get singleValue:true added',

src/services/enhanced-config-validator.ts

@@ -401,7 +401,59 @@ export class EnhancedConfigValidator extends ConfigValidator {
     config: Record<string, any>,
     result: EnhancedValidationResult
   ): void {
-    // Examples removed - validation provides error messages and fixes instead
+    const url = String(config.url || '');
+    const options = config.options || {};
+
+    // 1. Suggest alwaysOutputData for better error handling (node-level property)
+    // Note: We can't check if it exists (it's node-level, not in parameters),
+    // but we can suggest it as a best practice
+    if (!result.suggestions.some(s => typeof s === 'string' && s.includes('alwaysOutputData'))) {
+      result.suggestions.push(
+        'Consider adding alwaysOutputData: true at node level (not in parameters) for better error handling. ' +
+        'This ensures the node produces output even when HTTP requests fail, allowing downstream error handling.'
+      );
+    }
+
+    // 2. Suggest responseFormat for API endpoints
+    const lowerUrl = url.toLowerCase();
+    const isApiEndpoint =
+      // Subdomain patterns (api.example.com)
+      /^https?:\/\/api\./i.test(url) ||
+      // Path patterns with word boundaries to prevent false positives like "therapist", "restaurant"
+      /\/api[\/\?]|\/api$/i.test(url) ||
+      /\/rest[\/\?]|\/rest$/i.test(url) ||
+      // Known API service domains
+      lowerUrl.includes('supabase.co') ||
+      lowerUrl.includes('firebase') ||
+      lowerUrl.includes('googleapis.com') ||
+      // Versioned API paths (e.g., example.com/v1, example.com/v2)
+      /\.com\/v\d+/i.test(url);
+
+    if (isApiEndpoint && !options.response?.response?.responseFormat) {
+      result.suggestions.push(
+        'API endpoints should explicitly set options.response.response.responseFormat to "json" or "text" ' +
+        'to prevent confusion about response parsing. Example: ' +
+        '{ "options": { "response": { "response": { "responseFormat": "json" } } } }'
+      );
+    }
+
+    // 3. Enhanced URL protocol validation for expressions
+    if (url && url.startsWith('=')) {
+      // Expression-based URL - check for common protocol issues
+      const expressionContent = url.slice(1); // Remove = prefix
+      const lowerExpression = expressionContent.toLowerCase();
+
+      // Check for missing protocol in expression (case-insensitive)
+      if (expressionContent.startsWith('www.') ||
+          (expressionContent.includes('{{') && !lowerExpression.includes('http'))) {
+        result.warnings.push({
+          type: 'invalid_value',
+          property: 'url',
+          message: 'URL expression appears to be missing http:// or https:// protocol',
+          suggestion: 'Include protocol in your expression. Example: ={{ "https://" + $json.domain + ".com" }}'
+        });
+      }
+    }
   }
   
   /**

src/services/workflow-diff-engine.ts

@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ const logger = new Logger({ prefix: '[WorkflowDiffEngine]' });
 export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
   // Track node name changes during operations for connection reference updates
   private renameMap: Map<string, string> = new Map();
+  // Track warnings during operation processing
+  private warnings: WorkflowDiffValidationError[] = [];
 
   /**
    * Apply diff operations to a workflow
@@ -47,8 +49,9 @@ export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
     request: WorkflowDiffRequest
   ): Promise<WorkflowDiffResult> {
     try {
-      // Reset rename tracking for this diff operation
+      // Reset tracking for this diff operation
       this.renameMap.clear();
+      this.warnings = [];
 
       // Clone workflow to avoid modifying original
       const workflowCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(workflow));
@@ -114,6 +117,7 @@ export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
               ? 'Validation successful. All operations are valid.'
               : `Validation completed with ${errors.length} errors.`,
             errors: errors.length > 0 ? errors : undefined,
+            warnings: this.warnings.length > 0 ? this.warnings : undefined,
             applied: appliedIndices,
             failed: failedIndices
           };
@@ -126,6 +130,7 @@ export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
           operationsApplied: appliedIndices.length,
           message: `Applied ${appliedIndices.length} operations, ${failedIndices.length} failed (continueOnError mode)`,
           errors: errors.length > 0 ? errors : undefined,
+          warnings: this.warnings.length > 0 ? this.warnings : undefined,
           applied: appliedIndices,
           failed: failedIndices
         };
@@ -213,7 +218,8 @@ export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
           success: true,
           workflow: workflowCopy,
           operationsApplied,
-          message: `Successfully applied ${operationsApplied} operations (${nodeOperations.length} node ops, ${otherOperations.length} other ops)`
+          message: `Successfully applied ${operationsApplied} operations (${nodeOperations.length} node ops, ${otherOperations.length} other ops)`,
+          warnings: this.warnings.length > 0 ? this.warnings : undefined
         };
       }
     } catch (error) {
@@ -685,6 +691,24 @@ export class WorkflowDiffEngine {
       sourceIndex = operation.case;
     }
 
+    // Validation: Warn if using sourceIndex with If/Switch nodes without smart parameters
+    if (sourceNode && operation.sourceIndex !== undefined && operation.branch === undefined && operation.case === undefined) {
+      if (sourceNode.type === 'n8n-nodes-base.if') {
+        this.warnings.push({
+          operation: -1,  // Not tied to specific operation index in request
+          message: `Connection to If node "${operation.source}" uses sourceIndex=${operation.sourceIndex}. ` +
+            `Consider using branch="true" or branch="false" for better clarity. ` +
+            `If node outputs: main[0]=TRUE branch, main[1]=FALSE branch.`
+        });
+      } else if (sourceNode.type === 'n8n-nodes-base.switch') {
+        this.warnings.push({
+          operation: -1,  // Not tied to specific operation index in request
+          message: `Connection to Switch node "${operation.source}" uses sourceIndex=${operation.sourceIndex}. ` +
+            `Consider using case=N for better clarity (case=0 for first output, case=1 for second, etc.).`
+        });
+      }
+    }
+
     return { sourceOutput, sourceIndex };
   }
 

src/types/workflow-diff.ts

@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ export interface WorkflowDiffResult {
   success: boolean;
   workflow?: any; // Updated workflow if successful
   errors?: WorkflowDiffValidationError[];
+  warnings?: WorkflowDiffValidationError[]; // Non-blocking warnings (e.g., parameter suggestions)
   operationsApplied?: number;
   message?: string;
   applied?: number[]; // Indices of successfully applied operations (when continueOnError is true)

tests/unit/mcp/handlers-workflow-diff.test.ts

@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ describe('handlers-workflow-diff', () => {
         operationsApplied: 1,
         message: 'Validation successful',
         errors: [],
+        warnings: []
       });
 
       const result = await handleUpdatePartialWorkflow(diffRequest, mockRepository);
@@ -199,6 +200,9 @@ describe('handlers-workflow-diff', () => {
           valid: true,
           operationsToApply: 1,
         },
+        details: {
+          warnings: []
+        }
       });
 
       expect(mockApiClient.updateWorkflow).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

tests/unit/services/enhanced-config-validator.test.ts

@@ -802,4 +802,335 @@ describe('EnhancedConfigValidator', () => {
       expect(result.errors[0].property).toBe('test');
     });
   });
+
+  describe('enhanceHttpRequestValidation', () => {
+    it('should suggest alwaysOutputData for HTTP Request nodes', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: 'https://api.example.com/data',
+        method: 'GET'
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true },
+        { name: 'method', type: 'options', required: false }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
+      expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+        expect.stringContaining('alwaysOutputData: true at node level')
+      );
+      expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+        expect.stringContaining('ensures the node produces output even when HTTP requests fail')
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should suggest responseFormat for API endpoint URLs', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: 'https://api.example.com/data',
+        method: 'GET',
+        options: {} // Empty options, no responseFormat
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true },
+        { name: 'method', type: 'options', required: false },
+        { name: 'options', type: 'collection', required: false }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
+      expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+        expect.stringContaining('responseFormat')
+      );
+      expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+        expect.stringContaining('options.response.response.responseFormat')
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should suggest responseFormat for Supabase URLs', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: 'https://xxciwnthnnywanbplqwg.supabase.co/rest/v1/messages',
+        method: 'GET',
+        options: {}
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+        expect.stringContaining('responseFormat')
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should NOT suggest responseFormat when already configured', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: 'https://api.example.com/data',
+        method: 'GET',
+        options: {
+          response: {
+            response: {
+              responseFormat: 'json'
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true },
+        { name: 'options', type: 'collection', required: false }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      const responseFormatSuggestion = result.suggestions.find(
+        (s: string) => s.includes('responseFormat')
+      );
+      expect(responseFormatSuggestion).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+
+    it('should warn about missing protocol in expression-based URLs', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: '=www.{{ $json.domain }}.com',
+        method: 'GET'
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      expect(result.warnings).toContainEqual(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          type: 'invalid_value',
+          property: 'url',
+          message: expect.stringContaining('missing http:// or https://')
+        })
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should warn about missing protocol in expressions with template markers', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: '={{ $json.domain }}/api/data',
+        method: 'GET'
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      expect(result.warnings).toContainEqual(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          type: 'invalid_value',
+          property: 'url',
+          message: expect.stringContaining('missing http:// or https://')
+        })
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should NOT warn when expression includes http protocol', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: '={{ "https://" + $json.domain + ".com" }}',
+        method: 'GET'
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      const urlWarning = result.warnings.find(
+        (w: any) => w.property === 'url' && w.message.includes('protocol')
+      );
+      expect(urlWarning).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+
+    it('should NOT suggest responseFormat for non-API URLs', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: 'https://example.com/page.html',
+        method: 'GET',
+        options: {}
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      const responseFormatSuggestion = result.suggestions.find(
+        (s: string) => s.includes('responseFormat')
+      );
+      expect(responseFormatSuggestion).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+
+    it('should detect missing protocol in expressions with uppercase HTTP', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const config = {
+        url: '={{ "HTTP://" + $json.domain + ".com" }}',
+        method: 'GET'
+      };
+      const properties = [
+        { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+      ];
+
+      const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+        nodeType,
+        config,
+        properties,
+        'operation',
+        'ai-friendly'
+      );
+
+      // Should NOT warn because HTTP:// is present (case-insensitive)
+      expect(result.warnings).toHaveLength(0);
+    });
+
+    it('should NOT suggest responseFormat for false positive URLs', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const testUrls = [
+        'https://example.com/therapist-directory',
+        'https://restaurant-bookings.com/reserve',
+        'https://forest-management.org/data'
+      ];
+
+      testUrls.forEach(url => {
+        const config = {
+          url,
+          method: 'GET',
+          options: {}
+        };
+        const properties = [
+          { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+        ];
+
+        const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+          nodeType,
+          config,
+          properties,
+          'operation',
+          'ai-friendly'
+        );
+
+        const responseFormatSuggestion = result.suggestions.find(
+          (s: string) => s.includes('responseFormat')
+        );
+        expect(responseFormatSuggestion).toBeUndefined();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('should suggest responseFormat for case-insensitive API paths', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const testUrls = [
+        'https://example.com/API/users',
+        'https://example.com/Rest/data',
+        'https://example.com/REST/v1/items'
+      ];
+
+      testUrls.forEach(url => {
+        const config = {
+          url,
+          method: 'GET',
+          options: {}
+        };
+        const properties = [
+          { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+        ];
+
+        const result = EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+          nodeType,
+          config,
+          properties,
+          'operation',
+          'ai-friendly'
+        );
+
+        expect(result.suggestions).toContainEqual(
+          expect.stringContaining('responseFormat')
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('should handle null and undefined URLs gracefully', () => {
+      const nodeType = 'nodes-base.httpRequest';
+      const testConfigs = [
+        { url: null, method: 'GET' },
+        { url: undefined, method: 'GET' },
+        { url: '', method: 'GET' }
+      ];
+
+      testConfigs.forEach(config => {
+        const properties = [
+          { name: 'url', type: 'string', required: true }
+        ];
+
+        expect(() => {
+          EnhancedConfigValidator.validateWithMode(
+            nodeType,
+            config,
+            properties,
+            'operation',
+            'ai-friendly'
+          );
+        }).not.toThrow();
+      });
+    });
+  });
 });

tests/unit/services/workflow-diff-engine.test.ts

@@ -1418,6 +1418,113 @@ describe('WorkflowDiffEngine', () => {
       expect(result.workflow!.connections['Switch']['main'][2][0].node).toBe('Handler');
       expect(result.workflow!.connections['Switch']['main'][1]).toEqual([]);
     });
+
+    it('should warn when using sourceIndex with If node (issue #360)', async () => {
+      const addIF: any = {
+        type: 'addNode',
+        node: {
+          name: 'Check Condition',
+          type: 'n8n-nodes-base.if',
+          position: [400, 300]
+        }
+      };
+
+      const addSuccess: any = {
+        type: 'addNode',
+        node: {
+          name: 'Success Handler',
+          type: 'n8n-nodes-base.set',
+          position: [600, 200]
+        }
+      };
+
+      const addError: any = {
+        type: 'addNode',
+        node: {
+          name: 'Error Handler',
+          type: 'n8n-nodes-base.set',
+          position: [600, 400]
+        }
+      };
+
+      // BAD: Using sourceIndex with If node (reproduces issue #360)
+      const connectSuccess: any = {
+        type: 'addConnection',
+        source: 'Check Condition',
+        target: 'Success Handler',
+        sourceIndex: 0  // Should use branch="true" instead
+      };
+
+      const connectError: any = {
+        type: 'addConnection',
+        source: 'Check Condition',
+        target: 'Error Handler',
+        sourceIndex: 0  // Should use branch="false" instead - both will end up in main[0]!
+      };
+
+      const request: WorkflowDiffRequest = {
+        id: 'test-workflow',
+        operations: [addIF, addSuccess, addError, connectSuccess, connectError]
+      };
+
+      const result = await diffEngine.applyDiff(baseWorkflow, request);
+
+      expect(result.success).toBe(true);
+
+      // Should produce warnings
+      expect(result.warnings).toBeDefined();
+      expect(result.warnings!.length).toBe(2);
+      expect(result.warnings![0].message).toContain('Consider using branch="true" or branch="false"');
+      expect(result.warnings![0].message).toContain('If node outputs: main[0]=TRUE branch, main[1]=FALSE branch');
+      expect(result.warnings![1].message).toContain('Consider using branch="true" or branch="false"');
+
+      // Both connections end up in main[0] (the bug behavior)
+      expect(result.workflow!.connections['Check Condition']['main'][0].length).toBe(2);
+      expect(result.workflow!.connections['Check Condition']['main'][0][0].node).toBe('Success Handler');
+      expect(result.workflow!.connections['Check Condition']['main'][0][1].node).toBe('Error Handler');
+    });
+
+    it('should warn when using sourceIndex with Switch node', async () => {
+      const addSwitch: any = {
+        type: 'addNode',
+        node: {
+          name: 'Switch',
+          type: 'n8n-nodes-base.switch',
+          position: [400, 300]
+        }
+      };
+
+      const addHandler: any = {
+        type: 'addNode',
+        node: {
+          name: 'Handler',
+          type: 'n8n-nodes-base.set',
+          position: [600, 300]
+        }
+      };
+
+      // BAD: Using sourceIndex with Switch node
+      const connect: any = {
+        type: 'addConnection',
+        source: 'Switch',
+        target: 'Handler',
+        sourceIndex: 1  // Should use case=1 instead
+      };
+
+      const request: WorkflowDiffRequest = {
+        id: 'test-workflow',
+        operations: [addSwitch, addHandler, connect]
+      };
+
+      const result = await diffEngine.applyDiff(baseWorkflow, request);
+
+      expect(result.success).toBe(true);
+
+      // Should produce warning
+      expect(result.warnings).toBeDefined();
+      expect(result.warnings!.length).toBe(1);
+      expect(result.warnings![0].message).toContain('Consider using case=N for better clarity');
+    });
   });
 
   describe('AddConnection with sourceIndex (Phase 0 Fix)', () => {