ros/autocoder
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/leonvanzyl/autocoder.git synced 2026-01-30 06:12:06 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
56f260cb79594a58e2eeba3e9a28cf1656387e3c
autocoder/.claude/commands/review-pr.md
Auto 56f260cb79 feat(ui): use theme-aware colors for Maestro status card 
Replace hardcoded violet/purple colors in OrchestratorStatusCard with
standard primary color CSS variables to ensure proper theming across
all theme variants (light/dark mode, Twitter, Claude, Neo Brutalism,
Aurora, Retro Arcade).

Changes:
- Card background: bg-primary/10 with border-primary/30
- Maestro title and state text: text-primary
- Activity button: text-primary hover:bg-primary/10
- Events border and timestamps: use primary color variants

Also includes:
- Enhanced review-pr command with vision alignment checks
- CLAUDE.md improvements: prerequisites, testing section, React 19 update
- Simplified parallel mode documentation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-29 07:51:42 +02:00

1.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

description
description
Review pull requests

Pull request(s): $ARGUMENTS

  • If no PR numbers are provided, ask the user to provide PR number(s).
  • At least 1 PR is required.

TASKS

  1. Retrieve PR Details

    • Use the GH CLI tool to retrieve the details (descriptions, diffs, comments, feedback, reviews, etc)

  2. Analyze Codebase Impact

    • Use 3 deepdive subagents to analyze the impact on the codebase

  3. Vision Alignment Check

    • Read the project's README.md and CLAUDE.md to understand the application's core purpose
    • Assess whether this PR aligns with the application's intended functionality
    • If the changes deviate significantly from the core vision or add functionality that doesn't serve the application's purpose, note this in the review
    • This is not a blocker, but should be flagged for the reviewer's consideration

  4. Safety Assessment

    • Provide a review on whether the PR is safe to merge as-is
    • Provide any feedback in terms of risk level

  5. Improvements

    • Propose any improvements in terms of importance and complexity