ros/BMAD-METHOD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
fbbda0067add5d491cf5bfdb631f7a62176e8404
BMAD-METHOD/docs/testarch-file-review/audit-report-testarch-nfr-assess-2025-10-16.md
Brian Madison fbbda0067a testarch review
2025-10-16 18:58:44 -05:00

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

Workflow Audit Report

Workflow: testarch-nfr-assess Audit Date: 2025-10-16 Auditor: Audit Workflow (BMAD v6) Workflow Type: Document workflow (has template) Workflow Path: /Users/brianmadison/dev/BMAD-METHOD/src/modules/bmm/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess

Executive Summary

Overall Status: ⚠️ CONCERNS - Significant bloat detected, missing web_bundle configuration

  • Critical Issues: 1
  • Important Issues: 2
  • Cleanup Recommendations: 4

Key Findings:

  1. ✅ Standard config block is correctly configured
  2. ✅ Document workflow correctly configured (has template file)
  3. ❌ SIGNIFICANT BLOAT: 32 variables defined with ~75% bloat (24 unused variables!)
  4. ❌ No web_bundle configuration (critical for web deployment)
  5. ⚠️ Config variable usage missing
  6. ⚠️ Template integration likely broken (needs verification)

1. Standard Config Block Validation

Required Variables Check

✅ Config Source Check:

  • config_source is defined: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/config.yaml"
  • Points to correct module config path (bmm)
  • Uses {project-root} variable

✅ Standard Variables Check:

  • output_folder pulls from config_source: "{config_source}:output_folder"
  • user_name pulls from config_source: "{config_source}:user_name"
  • communication_language pulls from config_source: "{config_source}:communication_language"
  • date is set to system-generated: "system-generated"

Status: ✅ PASS - All standard config variables present and correctly configured

2. YAML/Instruction/Template Alignment

Variables Analysis

Total YAML fields analyzed: 32 variables defined in workflow.yaml (excluding standard config and metadata)

Files Present:

  • ✅ workflow.yaml
  • ✅ instructions.md
  • ✅ checklist.md
  • ✅ nfr-report-template.md (template file for document workflow)
  • ✅ README.md

Workflow Type: Document workflow (has template: "{installed_path}/nfr-report-template.md")

SIGNIFICANT BLOAT DETECTED (75%):

Category 1: NFR Category Flags (4 variables - should assess ALL)

  1. assess_performance: true
  2. assess_security: true
  3. assess_reliability: true
  4. assess_maintainability: true

Recommendation: Remove. An NFR assessment workflow should ALWAYS assess ALL standard NFR categories. Making these optional defeats the purpose.

Rationale: You don't skip security assessment just because a flag is false! Always assess all NFRs, mark as "NOT_APPLICABLE" if truly not relevant.

Category 2: Threshold Values (5 variables - should be project config)

  1. performance_response_time_ms: 500
  2. performance_throughput_rps: 100
  3. security_score_min: 85
  4. reliability_uptime_pct: 99.9
  5. maintainability_coverage_pct: 80

Recommendation: Move to bmm/config.yaml as project-wide NFR standards. Reference via {config_source}:nfr_performance_response_time_ms pattern.

Rationale: NFR thresholds are project-level quality standards, not workflow-specific variables.

Category 3: Boolean Behavior Flags (15 variables - likely all apply unconditionally)

Assessment Configuration: 10. use_deterministic_rules: true - Deterministic assessment should always be used 11. never_guess_thresholds: true - Never guessing should always be the rule 12. require_evidence: true - Evidence should always be required 13. suggest_monitoring: true - Monitoring suggestions should always be provided

BMad Integration: 14. use_tech_spec: true - Auto-load if exists 15. use_prd: true - Auto-load if exists 16. use_test_design: true - Auto-load if exists

Evidence Sources: 17. include_ci_results: true - CI results should always be analyzed

Output Configuration: 18. generate_gate_yaml: true - Gate YAML should always be generated 19. generate_evidence_checklist: true - Evidence checklist should always be generated 20. update_story_file: false - Optional output mode

Quality Gates: 21. fail_on_critical_nfr: true - Always fail on critical NFR failure 22. warn_on_concerns: true - Always warn on concerns 23. block_release_on_fail: true - Always block on failure

Advanced Options: 24. auto_load_knowledge: true - Always load knowledge base 25. include_quick_wins: true - Always suggest quick wins 26. include_recommended_actions: true - Always provide recommendations

Recommendation: Remove ALL 15 boolean flags. An NFR assessment should ALWAYS:

  • Use deterministic rules (not guesswork)
  • Require evidence
  • Suggest monitoring
  • Generate gate YAML
  • Provide recommendations
  • Block release on critical failures

These aren't user choices - they're assessment methodology requirements.

Category 4: Empty Placeholders (3 variables)

  1. story_file: ""
  2. feature_name: ""
  3. custom_nfr_categories: ""

Recommendation: Remove. Use tags to elicit these if needed.

Category 5: Redundant Output Path (1 variable)

  1. output_file: "{output_folder}/nfr-assessment.md" - Duplicates default_output_file

Recommendation: Remove. Use default_output_file.

Category 6: Directory Paths (3 variables)

  1. test_results_dir: "{project-root}/test-results"
  2. metrics_dir: "{project-root}/metrics"
  3. logs_dir: "{project-root}/logs"

Recommendation: Keep or consolidate. These are standard paths but could be auto-detected.

Category 7: Acceptable Variables (Keep These)

  1. test_results_dir, metrics_dir, logs_dir - MAYBE KEEP (standard paths, could auto-detect)
  2. default_output_file: "{output_folder}/nfr-assessment.md" - KEEP (output path)
  3. installed_path, instructions, validation, template - KEEP (standard workflow fields)

Total Variables Analyzed: 32 variables Legitimate Variables: ~4-7 (directory paths?, default_output_file + standard fields) Bloat: ~25-28 variables (78-87% bloat!)

Status: ❌ FAIL - SEVERE bloat (75%+ of variables unused or should be hardcoded methodology)

3. Config Variable Usage

Communication Language Check:

  • ❌ MISSING - No "communicate in {communication_language}" pattern
  • Severity: IMPORTANT

User Name Check:

  • ❌ MISSING - No {user_name} usage
  • Severity: MINOR (optional)

Output Folder Check:

  • ✅ USED - default_output_file uses {output_folder}
  • Severity: N/A

Date Usage Check:

  • ✅ AVAILABLE - Date defined for template
  • Severity: N/A

Status: ⚠️ IMPORTANT - Config variables not fully utilized

4. Web Bundle Validation

Web Bundle Present: ❌ NO

Status: ❌ CRITICAL - No web_bundle configuration found

web_bundle: false

Knowledge Fragment Dependencies (from auto_load_knowledge comment):

  • nfr-criteria
  • ci-burn-in

Template File:

  • nfr-report-template.md

Expected web_bundle structure:

web_bundle:
  workflow_path: 'bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/workflow.yaml'
  web_bundle_files:
    - 'bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/instructions.md'
    - 'bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/checklist.md'
    - 'bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/nfr-report-template.md'
    - 'bmad/bmm/testarch/knowledge/nfr-criteria.md'
    - 'bmad/bmm/testarch/knowledge/ci-burn-in.md'
    - 'bmad/bmm/testarch/tea-index.csv'

Severity: CRITICAL

5. Bloat Detection

Total YAML fields: 32 variables Used fields: ~4-7 (12-22%) Unused fields: ~25-28 (78-88%) Bloat percentage: 78-88% (approaching automate's champion status!)

Detailed Bloat Analysis:

Remove NFR Category Flags (4 variables):

1-4. assess_performance/security/reliability/maintainability

Rationale: Always assess ALL NFRs. Don't skip security just because flag is false!

Move Threshold Values to Project Config (5 variables):

5-9. performance_response_time_ms, performance_throughput_rps, security_score_min, reliability_uptime_pct, maintainability_coverage_pct

Rationale: These are project-wide quality standards, not workflow variables.

Remove Methodology Requirement Flags (15 variables):

10-24. All boolean flags (use_deterministic_rules, require_evidence, generate_gate_yaml, fail_on_critical_nfr, etc.)

Rationale: These define NFR assessment methodology and should NEVER be optional.

Remove Empty Placeholders (3 variables):

25-27. story_file, feature_name, custom_nfr_categories

Rationale: Use tags instead.

Remove Redundant Output Path (1 variable):

  1. output_file

Rationale: Use default_output_file.

Maybe Keep Directory Paths (3 variables):

29-31. test_results_dir, metrics_dir, logs_dir

Decision: Could auto-detect these standard locations.

Total Bloat: 24-27 of 32 variables (75-84%)

After Cleanup:

  1. test_results_dir, metrics_dir, logs_dir - Maybe keep
  2. default_output_file - Keep
  3. Standard fields - Keep

Result: 32 → 4-7 variables (78-87% reduction!)

6. Template Variable Mapping

Workflow Type: Document workflow (has template)

Template File: nfr-report-template.md

Status: ⚠️ LIKELY BROKEN - Template integration needs verification (pattern from previous audits)

Recommendation: Verify template integration or remove template.

Recommendations

Critical (Fix Immediately)

  1. Add web_bundle configuration
    • Severity: CRITICAL
    • Impact: Enables web deployment

Important (Address Soon)

  1. Fix template integration

    • Severity: IMPORTANT
    • Impact: Template functionality

  2. Add config variable usage

    • Severity: IMPORTANT
    • Impact: BMAD v6 compliance

Cleanup (Nice to Have)

  1. Remove ALL NFR category flags (4 variables)

    • Always assess all NFRs
    • Severity: CLEANUP
    • Impact: Can't skip security assessment!

  2. Move thresholds to project config (5 variables)

    • Project-wide quality standards
    • Severity: CLEANUP
    • Impact: Centralized NFR standards

  3. Remove methodology flags (15 variables)

    • NFR assessment requirements, not choices
    • Severity: CLEANUP
    • Impact: Ensures methodology integrity

  4. Remove empty placeholders and redundant paths (4 variables)

    • Severity: CLEANUP
    • Impact: Cleaner configuration

  5. Simplify to essential variables

    • Result: 32 → 4-7 variables (78-87% reduction!)
    • Severity: CLEANUP
    • Impact: Dramatically improved maintainability

Validation Checklist

  • All standard config variables present ✅
  • No unused yaml fields (bloat removed)
  • Config variables used appropriately
  • Web bundle includes all dependencies
  • Template variables properly mapped
  • File structure follows v6 conventions ✅
  • Variables reduced from 32 to 4-7
  • NFR category flags removed (always assess all)
  • Thresholds moved to project config
  • Methodology flags removed
  • Document workflow correctly configured ✅

Next Steps

  1. Fix web_bundle immediately
  2. Address template integration and config usage
  3. Consider cleanup - 78-87% bloat reduction!
  4. Re-run audit after fixes

Cleanup Impact:

  • Variables: 32 → 4-7 (78-87% reduction!)
  • Bloat: 78-87% → 0%
  • Maintainability: Dramatically improved
  • Methodology Integrity: Ensured
  • Web deployment: Enabled

Positive Observations

  1. ✅ Comprehensive NFR Coverage

    • Performance, security, reliability, maintainability
    • Evidence-based assessment
    • Gate decision integration

  2. ✅ Proper Document Workflow Structure

    • Has template file
    • Clear output path

  3. ✅ Good Methodology

    • Deterministic rules
    • Evidence requirements
    • Gate blocking on failures

  4. ✅ Knowledge Base Integration

    • References tea-index.csv
    • Loads NFR criteria

Overall: Well-designed NFR assessment workflow with excellent methodology but SEVERE bloat (78-87%). The 4 NFR category flags allow skipping security/performance assessment - unacceptable! The 15 methodology flags make requirements optional - defeating the purpose! Removing bloat would make this exceptional.

The NFR Assessment Paradox: Allowing users to set assess_security: false means security NFRs won't be assessed - a major release risk! All NFRs should ALWAYS be assessed, marked as NOT_APPLICABLE if truly irrelevant.

Audit Complete - Generated by audit-workflow v1.0