230 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
230 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
# Product Owner (PO) Validation Checklist
|
|
|
|
This checklist serves as a comprehensive framework for the Product Owner to validate the complete MVP plan before development execution. The PO should systematically work through each item, documenting compliance status and noting any deficiencies.
|
|
|
|
## 1. PROJECT SETUP & INITIALIZATION
|
|
|
|
### 1.1 Project Scaffolding
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Epic 1 includes explicit steps for project creation/initialization
|
|
- [ ] If using a starter template, steps for cloning/setup are included
|
|
- [ ] If building from scratch, all necessary scaffolding steps are defined
|
|
- [ ] Initial README or documentation setup is included
|
|
- [ ] Repository setup and initial commit processes are defined (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
### 1.2 Development Environment
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Local development environment setup is clearly defined
|
|
- [ ] Required tools and versions are specified (Node.js, Python, etc.)
|
|
- [ ] Steps for installing dependencies are included
|
|
- [ ] Configuration files (dotenv, config files, etc.) are addressed
|
|
- [ ] Development server setup is included
|
|
|
|
### 1.3 Core Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All critical packages/libraries are installed early in the process
|
|
- [ ] Package management (npm, pip, etc.) is properly addressed
|
|
- [ ] Version specifications are appropriately defined
|
|
- [ ] Dependency conflicts or special requirements are noted
|
|
|
|
## 2. INFRASTRUCTURE & DEPLOYMENT SEQUENCING
|
|
|
|
### 2.1 Database & Data Store Setup
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Database selection/setup occurs before any database operations
|
|
- [ ] Schema definitions are created before data operations
|
|
- [ ] Migration strategies are defined if applicable
|
|
- [ ] Seed data or initial data setup is included if needed
|
|
- [ ] Database access patterns and security are established early
|
|
|
|
### 2.2 API & Service Configuration
|
|
|
|
- [ ] API frameworks are set up before implementing endpoints
|
|
- [ ] Service architecture is established before implementing services
|
|
- [ ] Authentication framework is set up before protected routes
|
|
- [ ] Middleware and common utilities are created before use
|
|
|
|
### 2.3 Deployment Pipeline
|
|
|
|
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline is established before any deployment actions
|
|
- [ ] Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is set up before use
|
|
- [ ] Environment configurations (dev, staging, prod) are defined early
|
|
- [ ] Deployment strategies are defined before implementation
|
|
- [ ] Rollback procedures or considerations are addressed
|
|
|
|
### 2.4 Testing Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Testing frameworks are installed before writing tests
|
|
- [ ] Test environment setup precedes test implementation
|
|
- [ ] Mock services or data are defined before testing
|
|
- [ ] Test utilities or helpers are created before use
|
|
|
|
## 3. EXTERNAL DEPENDENCIES & INTEGRATIONS
|
|
|
|
### 3.1 Third-Party Services
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Account creation steps are identified for required services
|
|
- [ ] API key acquisition processes are defined
|
|
- [ ] Steps for securely storing credentials are included
|
|
- [ ] Fallback or offline development options are considered
|
|
|
|
### 3.2 External APIs
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Integration points with external APIs are clearly identified
|
|
- [ ] Authentication with external services is properly sequenced
|
|
- [ ] API limits or constraints are acknowledged
|
|
- [ ] Backup strategies for API failures are considered
|
|
|
|
### 3.3 Infrastructure Services
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Cloud resource provisioning is properly sequenced
|
|
- [ ] DNS or domain registration needs are identified
|
|
- [ ] Email or messaging service setup is included if needed
|
|
- [ ] CDN or static asset hosting setup precedes their use
|
|
|
|
## 4. USER/AGENT RESPONSIBILITY DELINEATION
|
|
|
|
### 4.1 User Actions
|
|
|
|
- [ ] User responsibilities are limited to only what requires human intervention
|
|
- [ ] Account creation on external services is properly assigned to users
|
|
- [ ] Purchasing or payment actions are correctly assigned to users
|
|
- [ ] Credential provision is appropriately assigned to users
|
|
|
|
### 4.2 Developer Agent Actions
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All code-related tasks are assigned to developer agents
|
|
- [ ] Automated processes are correctly identified as agent responsibilities
|
|
- [ ] Configuration management is properly assigned
|
|
- [ ] Testing and validation are assigned to appropriate agents
|
|
|
|
## 5. FEATURE SEQUENCING & DEPENDENCIES
|
|
|
|
### 5.1 Functional Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Features that depend on other features are sequenced correctly
|
|
- [ ] Shared components are built before their use
|
|
- [ ] User flows follow a logical progression
|
|
- [ ] Authentication features precede protected routes/features
|
|
|
|
### 5.2 Technical Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Lower-level services are built before higher-level ones
|
|
- [ ] Libraries and utilities are created before their use
|
|
- [ ] Data models are defined before operations on them
|
|
- [ ] API endpoints are defined before client consumption
|
|
|
|
### 5.3 Cross-Epic Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Later epics build upon functionality from earlier epics
|
|
- [ ] No epic requires functionality from later epics
|
|
- [ ] Infrastructure established in early epics is utilized consistently
|
|
- [ ] Incremental value delivery is maintained
|
|
|
|
## 6. MVP SCOPE ALIGNMENT
|
|
|
|
### 6.1 PRD Goals Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All core goals defined in the PRD are addressed in epics/stories
|
|
- [ ] Features directly support the defined MVP goals
|
|
- [ ] No extraneous features beyond MVP scope are included
|
|
- [ ] Critical features are prioritized appropriately
|
|
|
|
### 6.2 User Journey Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All critical user journeys are fully implemented
|
|
- [ ] Edge cases and error scenarios are addressed
|
|
- [ ] User experience considerations are included
|
|
- [ ] Accessibility requirements are incorporated if specified
|
|
|
|
### 6.3 Technical Requirements Satisfaction
|
|
|
|
- [ ] All technical constraints from the PRD are addressed
|
|
- [ ] Non-functional requirements are incorporated
|
|
- [ ] Architecture decisions align with specified constraints
|
|
- [ ] Performance considerations are appropriately addressed
|
|
|
|
## 7. RISK MANAGEMENT & PRACTICALITY
|
|
|
|
### 7.1 Technical Risk Mitigation
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Complex or unfamiliar technologies have appropriate learning/prototyping stories
|
|
- [ ] High-risk components have explicit validation steps
|
|
- [ ] Fallback strategies exist for risky integrations
|
|
- [ ] Performance concerns have explicit testing/validation
|
|
|
|
### 7.2 External Dependency Risks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Risks with third-party services are acknowledged and mitigated
|
|
- [ ] API limits or constraints are addressed
|
|
- [ ] Backup strategies exist for critical external services
|
|
- [ ] Cost implications of external services are considered
|
|
|
|
### 7.3 Timeline Practicality
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Story complexity and sequencing suggest a realistic timeline
|
|
- [ ] Dependencies on external factors are minimized or managed
|
|
- [ ] Parallel work is enabled where possible
|
|
- [ ] Critical path is identified and optimized
|
|
|
|
## 8. DOCUMENTATION & HANDOFF
|
|
|
|
### 8.1 Developer Documentation
|
|
|
|
- [ ] API documentation is created alongside implementation
|
|
- [ ] Setup instructions are comprehensive
|
|
- [ ] Architecture decisions are documented
|
|
- [ ] Patterns and conventions are documented
|
|
|
|
### 8.2 User Documentation
|
|
|
|
- [ ] User guides or help documentation is included if required
|
|
- [ ] Error messages and user feedback are considered
|
|
- [ ] Onboarding flows are fully specified
|
|
- [ ] Support processes are defined if applicable
|
|
|
|
## 9. POST-MVP CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
|
|
### 9.1 Future Enhancements
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Clear separation between MVP and future features
|
|
- [ ] Architecture supports planned future enhancements
|
|
- [ ] Technical debt considerations are documented
|
|
- [ ] Extensibility points are identified
|
|
|
|
### 9.2 Feedback Mechanisms
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Analytics or usage tracking is included if required
|
|
- [ ] User feedback collection is considered
|
|
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting are addressed
|
|
- [ ] Performance measurement is incorporated
|
|
|
|
## VALIDATION SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
### Category Statuses
|
|
|
|
| Category | Status | Critical Issues |
|
|
| ----------------------------------------- | ----------------- | --------------- |
|
|
| 1. Project Setup & Initialization | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 2. Infrastructure & Deployment Sequencing | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 3. External Dependencies & Integrations | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 4. User/Agent Responsibility Delineation | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 5. Feature Sequencing & Dependencies | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 6. MVP Scope Alignment | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 7. Risk Management & Practicality | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 8. Documentation & Handoff | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
| 9. Post-MVP Considerations | PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL | |
|
|
|
|
### Critical Deficiencies
|
|
|
|
- List all critical issues that must be addressed before approval
|
|
|
|
### Recommendations
|
|
|
|
- Provide specific recommendations for addressing each deficiency
|
|
|
|
### Final Decision
|
|
|
|
- **APPROVED**: The plan is comprehensive, properly sequenced, and ready for implementation.
|
|
- **REJECTED**: The plan requires revision to address the identified deficiencies.
|