ros/BMAD-METHOD
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git synced 2026-01-30 04:32:02 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
9b9f43fcb98bb87dd519ad72983eb078389486e9
BMAD-METHOD/docs/how-to/workflows/run-implementation-readiness.md
forcetrainer e535f94325 docs: comprehensive style guide update with reference and glossary standards 
Style Guide Additions:
- Add Reference Structure section with 6 document types (Index, Catalog,
  Deep-Dive, Configuration, Glossary, Comprehensive)
- Add Glossary Structure section with table-based format leveraging
  Starlight's right-nav for navigation
- Include checklists for both new document types

Reference Docs Updated:
- agents/index.md: Catalog format, universal commands tip admonition
- configuration/core-tasks.md: Configuration format with admonitions
- configuration/global-config.md: Table-based config reference
- workflows/index.md: Minimal index format
- workflows/core-workflows.md: Catalog format
- workflows/document-project.md: Deep-dive with Quick Facts admonition
- workflows/bmgd-workflows.md: Comprehensive format, removed ~30 hr rules

Glossary Rewritten:
- Converted from 373 lines with ### headers to 123 lines with tables
- Right nav now shows 9 categories instead of 50+ terms
- Added italic context markers (*BMGD.*, *Brownfield.*, etc.)
- Alphabetized terms within categories
- Removed redundant inline TOC

All Docs:
- Remove horizontal rules (---) per style guide
- Remove "Related" sections (sidebar handles navigation)
- Standardize admonition usage
- Archive deleted workflow customization docs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-12 00:23:05 -05:00

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

title, description
title description
How to Run Implementation Readiness How to validate planning and solutioning before implementation

Use the implementation-readiness workflow to validate that planning and solutioning are complete and aligned before Phase 4 implementation.

When to Use This

  • Always before Phase 4 for BMad Method and Enterprise projects
  • After create-epics-and-stories workflow completes
  • Before sprint-planning workflow
  • When stakeholders request readiness check

When to Skip This

  • Quick Flow (no solutioning phase)
  • BMad Method Simple (no gate check required)

:::note[Prerequisites]

  • BMad Method installed
  • Architect agent available
  • PRD, Architecture, and Epics completed :::

Steps

1. Load the Architect Agent

Start a fresh chat and load the Architect agent.

2. Run the Workflow

*implementation-readiness

3. Let the Agent Validate

The workflow systematically checks:

  • PRD completeness
  • Architecture completeness
  • Epic/Story completeness
  • Alignment between all documents

4. Review the Gate Decision

The agent produces a gate decision with rationale.

Gate Decision Outcomes

Decision Meaning Action
PASS All critical criteria met, minor gaps acceptable Proceed to Phase 4
CONCERNS Some criteria not met but not blockers Proceed with caution, address gaps in parallel
FAIL Critical gaps or contradictions BLOCK Phase 4, resolve issues first

What Gets Checked

PRD/GDD Completeness:

  • Problem statement clear and evidence-based
  • Success metrics defined
  • User personas identified
  • FRs and NFRs complete
  • Risks and assumptions documented

Architecture Completeness:

  • System, data, API architecture defined
  • Key ADRs documented
  • Security architecture addressed
  • FR/NFR-specific guidance provided
  • Standards and conventions defined

Epic/Story Completeness:

  • All PRD features mapped to stories
  • Stories have acceptance criteria
  • Stories prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
  • Dependencies identified

Alignment Checks:

  • Architecture addresses all PRD FRs/NFRs
  • Epics align with architecture decisions
  • No contradictions between epics
  • Integration points clear

What You Get

An implementation-readiness.md document containing:

  1. Executive Summary (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL)
  2. Completeness Assessment (scores for PRD, Architecture, Epics)
  3. Alignment Assessment (PRD↔Architecture, Architecture↔Epics)
  4. Quality Assessment (story quality, dependencies, risks)
  5. Gaps and Recommendations (critical/minor gaps, remediation)
  6. Gate Decision with rationale
  7. Next Steps

Example

E-commerce platform → CONCERNS

Gaps identified:

  • Missing security architecture section
  • Undefined payment gateway

Recommendation:

  • Complete security section
  • Add payment gateway ADR

Action: Proceed with caution, address before payment epic.

Tips

  • Run before every Phase 4 start — It's a valuable checkpoint
  • Take FAIL decisions seriously — Fix issues first
  • Use CONCERNS as a checklist — Track parallel work
  • Document why you proceed despite concerns — Transparency matters

Next Steps

After implementation readiness:

  1. If PASS — Run sprint-planning to start Phase 4
  2. If CONCERNS — Proceed with documented gaps to address
  3. If FAIL — Return to relevant workflow to fix issues