Files
BMAD-METHOD/docs/how-to/workflows/run-implementation-readiness.md
forcetrainer 12d3492e0c Add link auditor, reorganize documentation, and README update (#1277)
* feat: add link auditor tools and fix broken docs links

- Add audit-doc-links.js to scan docs for broken links with auto-resolution
- Add fix-doc-links.js to apply suggested fixes (dry-run by default)
- Remove stale "Back to Core Concepts" breadcrumb links
- Update BMad acronym to "Breakthrough Method of Agile AI Driven Development"
- Update README links to docs.bmad-method.org
- Simplify upgrade callout in getting-started tutorial

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: reorganize docs structure and archive v4 tutorial

- Remove unused section index files (tutorials, how-to, explanation, reference)
- Move getting-started-bmadv4.md to _archive
- Update quick-start-bmgd.md to remove archived file reference
- Update upgrade-to-v6.md
- Update astro.config.mjs for new structure

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: ignore underscore directories in link checker

Update check-doc-links.js to skip _archive, _planning, and other
underscore-prefixed directories when validating links.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add v4 users section to README

Add links to v4 documentation archive and upgrade guide for users
migrating from previous versions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: convert docs to site-relative links and add validation tools

- Convert all relative links (./  ../) to site-relative paths (/path/)
- Strip .md extensions and use trailing slashes for Astro/Starlight
- Add fix-doc-links.js to convert relative links to site-relative
- Add validate-doc-links.js to check links point to existing files
- Remove old audit-doc-links.js and check-doc-links.js
- Update build-docs.js to use new validation script
- Add npm scripts: docs:fix-links, docs:validate-links
- Update style guide with validation steps

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: standardize acronym to BMad across documentation

Replace incorrect "BMAD" with correct "BMad" in text and frontmatter
while preserving "BMAD-METHOD" in GitHub URLs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: fix BMad acronym and remove draft README

- Correct acronym to "Breakthrough Method of Agile AI Driven Development"
- Remove unused README-draft.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: standardize BMad acronym in README

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: standardize FAQ format across all FAQ pages

- Add TOC with jump links under "## Questions"
- Use ### headers for questions (no Q: prefix)
- Direct answers without **A:** prefix
- Remove horizontal rules and "Related Documentation" sections
- End each FAQ with issue/Discord CTA
- Update style guide with new FAQ guidelines
- Delete redundant faq/index.md (sidebar handles navigation)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: use repo-relative links with .md for GitHub compatibility

Convert all documentation links to repo-relative format (/docs/path/file.md)
so they work when browsing on GitHub. The rehype plugin strips /docs/ prefix
and converts .md to trailing slash at build time for Astro/Starlight.

- Update rehype-markdown-links.js to strip /docs/ prefix from absolute paths
- Update fix-doc-links.js to generate /docs/ prefixed paths with .md extension
- Convert 217 links across 64 files to new format

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: handle /docs/ prefix in link validator

Update resolveLink to strip /docs/ prefix from repo-relative links
before checking if files exist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: restore FAQ index page

Re-add the FAQ index page that was accidentally deleted, with
updated repo-relative link format.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky@gmail.com>
2026-01-10 02:55:33 +08:00

163 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

---
title: "How to Run Implementation Readiness"
description: How to validate planning and solutioning before implementation
---
Use the `implementation-readiness` workflow to validate that planning and solutioning are complete and aligned before Phase 4 implementation.
---
## When to Use This
- **Always** before Phase 4 for BMad Method and Enterprise projects
- After create-epics-and-stories workflow completes
- Before sprint-planning workflow
- When stakeholders request readiness check
---
## When to Skip This
- Quick Flow (no solutioning phase)
- BMad Method Simple (no gate check required)
---
## Prerequisites
- BMad Method installed
- Architect agent available
- PRD, Architecture, and Epics completed
---
## Steps
### 1. Load the Architect Agent
Start a fresh chat and load the Architect agent.
### 2. Run the Workflow
```
*implementation-readiness
```
### 3. Let the Agent Validate
The workflow systematically checks:
- PRD completeness
- Architecture completeness
- Epic/Story completeness
- Alignment between all documents
### 4. Review the Gate Decision
The agent produces a gate decision with rationale.
---
## Gate Decision Outcomes
### ✅ PASS
- All critical criteria met
- Minor gaps acceptable with documented plan
- **Action:** Proceed to Phase 4
### ⚠️ CONCERNS
- Some criteria not met but not blockers
- Gaps identified with clear resolution path
- **Action:** Proceed with caution, address gaps in parallel
### ❌ FAIL
- Critical gaps or contradictions
- Architecture missing key decisions
- Epics conflict with PRD/architecture
- **Action:** BLOCK Phase 4, resolve issues first
---
## What Gets Checked
### PRD/GDD Completeness
- Problem statement clear and evidence-based
- Success metrics defined
- User personas identified
- Functional requirements (FRs) complete
- Non-functional requirements (NFRs) specified
- Risks and assumptions documented
### Architecture Completeness
- System architecture defined
- Data architecture specified
- API architecture decided
- Key ADRs documented
- Security architecture addressed
- FR/NFR-specific guidance provided
- Standards and conventions defined
### Epic/Story Completeness
- All PRD features mapped to stories
- Stories have acceptance criteria
- Stories prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- Dependencies identified
- Story sequencing logical
### Alignment Checks
- Architecture addresses all PRD FRs/NFRs
- Epics align with architecture decisions
- No contradictions between epics
- NFRs have technical approach
- Integration points clear
---
## What You Get
An `implementation-readiness.md` document containing:
1. **Executive Summary** (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL)
2. **Completeness Assessment** (scores for PRD, Architecture, Epics)
3. **Alignment Assessment** (PRD↔Architecture, Architecture↔Epics)
4. **Quality Assessment** (story quality, dependencies, risks)
5. **Gaps and Recommendations** (critical/minor gaps, remediation)
6. **Gate Decision** with rationale
7. **Next Steps**
---
## Example
E-commerce platform → CONCERNS ⚠️
**Gaps identified:**
- Missing security architecture section
- Undefined payment gateway
**Recommendation:**
- Complete security section
- Add payment gateway ADR
**Action:** Proceed with caution, address before payment epic.
---
## Tips
- Run this before every Phase 4 start
- Take FAIL decisions seriously - fix issues first
- Use CONCERNS as a checklist for parallel work
- Document why you proceed despite concerns
---
## Related
- [Create Architecture](/docs/how-to/workflows/create-architecture.md) - Architecture workflow
- [Create Epics and Stories](/docs/how-to/workflows/create-epics-and-stories.md) - Work breakdown
- [Run Sprint Planning](/docs/how-to/workflows/run-sprint-planning.md) - Start implementation