fix: enhance error output validation to detect incorrect configurations

- Add validateErrorOutputConfiguration method to detect when multiple nodes are incorrectly placed in main[0]
- Fix checkWorkflowPatterns to check main[1] for error outputs instead of outputs.error
- Cross-validate onError property matches actual connection structure
- Provide clear error messages with JSON examples showing correct configuration
- Use heuristic detection for error handler nodes (names containing error, fail, catch, etc.)
- Add comprehensive test coverage with 16+ test cases
- Bump version to 2.12.1

Fixes issues where AI agents would incorrectly configure error outputs by placing multiple nodes in the same array instead of separating them into success (main[0]) and error (main[1]) paths.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
czlonkowski
2025-09-22 21:05:27 +02:00
parent c5aebc1450
commit 1a926630b8
11 changed files with 3117 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ import { NodeRepository } from '../database/node-repository';
import { EnhancedConfigValidator } from './enhanced-config-validator';
import { ExpressionValidator } from './expression-validator';
import { Logger } from '../utils/logger';
const logger = new Logger({ prefix: '[WorkflowValidator]' });
interface WorkflowNode {
@@ -653,6 +652,11 @@ export class WorkflowValidator {
): void {
// Get source node for special validation
const sourceNode = nodeMap.get(sourceName);
// Special validation for main outputs with error handling
if (outputType === 'main' && sourceNode) {
this.validateErrorOutputConfiguration(sourceName, sourceNode, outputs, nodeMap, result);
}
outputs.forEach((outputConnections, outputIndex) => {
if (!outputConnections) return;
@@ -726,6 +730,90 @@ export class WorkflowValidator {
});
}
/**
* Validate error output configuration
*/
private validateErrorOutputConfiguration(
sourceName: string,
sourceNode: WorkflowNode,
outputs: Array<Array<{ node: string; type: string; index: number }>>,
nodeMap: Map<string, WorkflowNode>,
result: WorkflowValidationResult
): void {
// Check if node has onError: 'continueErrorOutput'
const hasErrorOutputSetting = sourceNode.onError === 'continueErrorOutput';
const hasErrorConnections = outputs.length > 1 && outputs[1] && outputs[1].length > 0;
// Validate mismatch between onError setting and connections
if (hasErrorOutputSetting && !hasErrorConnections) {
result.errors.push({
type: 'error',
nodeId: sourceNode.id,
nodeName: sourceNode.name,
message: `Node has onError: 'continueErrorOutput' but no error output connections in main[1]. Add error handler connections to main[1] or change onError to 'continueRegularOutput' or 'stopWorkflow'.`
});
}
if (!hasErrorOutputSetting && hasErrorConnections) {
result.warnings.push({
type: 'warning',
nodeId: sourceNode.id,
nodeName: sourceNode.name,
message: `Node has error output connections in main[1] but missing onError: 'continueErrorOutput'. Add this property to properly handle errors.`
});
}
// Check for common mistake: multiple nodes in main[0] when error handling is intended
if (outputs.length >= 1 && outputs[0] && outputs[0].length > 1) {
// Check if any of the nodes in main[0] look like error handlers
const potentialErrorHandlers = outputs[0].filter(conn => {
const targetNode = nodeMap.get(conn.node);
if (!targetNode) return false;
const nodeName = targetNode.name.toLowerCase();
const nodeType = targetNode.type.toLowerCase();
// Common patterns for error handler nodes
return nodeName.includes('error') ||
nodeName.includes('fail') ||
nodeName.includes('catch') ||
nodeName.includes('exception') ||
nodeType.includes('respondtowebhook') ||
nodeType.includes('emailsend');
});
if (potentialErrorHandlers.length > 0) {
const errorHandlerNames = potentialErrorHandlers.map(conn => `"${conn.node}"`).join(', ');
result.errors.push({
type: 'error',
nodeId: sourceNode.id,
nodeName: sourceNode.name,
message: `Incorrect error output configuration. Nodes ${errorHandlerNames} appear to be error handlers but are in main[0] (success output) along with other nodes.\n\n` +
`INCORRECT (current):\n` +
`"${sourceName}": {\n` +
` "main": [\n` +
` [ // main[0] has multiple nodes mixed together\n` +
outputs[0].map(conn => ` {"node": "${conn.node}", "type": "${conn.type}", "index": ${conn.index}}`).join(',\n') + '\n' +
` ]\n` +
` ]\n` +
`}\n\n` +
`CORRECT (should be):\n` +
`"${sourceName}": {\n` +
` "main": [\n` +
` [ // main[0] = success output\n` +
outputs[0].filter(conn => !potentialErrorHandlers.includes(conn)).map(conn => ` {"node": "${conn.node}", "type": "${conn.type}", "index": ${conn.index}}`).join(',\n') + '\n' +
` ],\n` +
` [ // main[1] = error output\n` +
potentialErrorHandlers.map(conn => ` {"node": "${conn.node}", "type": "${conn.type}", "index": ${conn.index}}`).join(',\n') + '\n' +
` ]\n` +
` ]\n` +
`}\n\n` +
`Also add: "onError": "continueErrorOutput" to the "${sourceName}" node.`
});
}
}
}
/**
* Validate AI tool connections
*/
@@ -957,9 +1045,9 @@ export class WorkflowValidator {
result: WorkflowValidationResult,
profile: string = 'runtime'
): void {
// Check for error handling
// Check for error handling (n8n uses main[1] for error outputs, not outputs.error)
const hasErrorHandling = Object.values(workflow.connections).some(
outputs => outputs.error && outputs.error.length > 0
outputs => outputs.main && outputs.main.length > 1 && outputs.main[1] && outputs.main[1].length > 0
);
// Only suggest error handling in stricter profiles