eadd13e798
This commit resolves several issues with the task expansion system to ensure higher quality subtasks and better synchronization: 1. Task File Generation - Add automatic regeneration of task files after expanding tasks - Ensure individual task text files stay in sync with tasks.json - Avoids manual regeneration steps after task expansion 2. Perplexity API Integration - Fix 'researchPrompt is not defined' error in Perplexity integration - Add specialized research-oriented prompt template - Improve system message for better context and instruction - Better fallback to Claude when Perplexity unavailable 3. Subtask Parsing Improvements - Enhance regex pattern to handle more formatting variations - Implement multiple parsing strategies for different response formats: * Improved section detection with flexible headings * Added support for numbered and bulleted lists * Implemented heuristic-based title and description extraction - Create more meaningful dummy subtasks with relevant titles and descriptions instead of generic placeholders - Ensure minimal descriptions are always provided 4. Quality Verification and Retry System - Add post-expansion verification to identify low-quality subtask sets - Detect tasks with too many generic/placeholder subtasks - Implement interactive retry mechanism with enhanced prompts - Use adjusted settings for retries (research mode, subtask count) - Clear existing subtasks before retry to prevent duplicates - Provide detailed reporting of verification and retry process These changes significantly improve the quality of generated subtasks and reduce the need for manual intervention when subtask generation produces suboptimal results.
47 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
47 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
<context>
|
|
# Overview
|
|
[Provide a high-level overview of your product here. Explain what problem it solves, who it's for, and why it's valuable.]
|
|
|
|
# Core Features
|
|
[List and describe the main features of your product. For each feature, include:
|
|
- What it does
|
|
- Why it's important
|
|
- How it works at a high level]
|
|
|
|
# User Experience
|
|
[Describe the user journey and experience. Include:
|
|
- User personas
|
|
- Key user flows
|
|
- UI/UX considerations]
|
|
</context>
|
|
<PRD>
|
|
# Technical Architecture
|
|
[Outline the technical implementation details:
|
|
- System components
|
|
- Data models
|
|
- APIs and integrations
|
|
- Infrastructure requirements]
|
|
|
|
# Development Roadmap
|
|
[Break down the development process into phases:
|
|
- MVP requirements
|
|
- Future enhancements
|
|
- Do not think about timelines whatsoever -- all that matters is scope and detailing exactly what needs to be build in each phase so it can later be cut up into tasks]
|
|
|
|
# Logical Dependency Chain
|
|
[Define the logical order of development:
|
|
- Which features need to be built first (foundation)
|
|
- Getting as quickly as possible to something usable/visible front end that works
|
|
- Properly pacing and scoping each feature so it is atomic but can also be built upon and improved as development approaches]
|
|
|
|
# Risks and Mitigations
|
|
[Identify potential risks and how they'll be addressed:
|
|
- Technical challenges
|
|
- Figuring out the MVP that we can build upon
|
|
- Resource constraints]
|
|
|
|
# Appendix
|
|
[Include any additional information:
|
|
- Research findings
|
|
- Technical specifications]
|
|
</PRD> |