2acba945c0
* Direct Integration of Roo Code Support ## Overview This PR adds native Roo Code support directly within the Task Master package, in contrast to PR #279 which proposed using a separate repository and patch script approach. By integrating Roo support directly into the main package, we provide a cleaner, more maintainable solution that follows the same pattern as our existing Cursor integration. ## Key Changes 1. **Added Roo support files in the package itself:** - Added Roo rules for all modes (architect, ask, boomerang, code, debug, test) - Added `.roomodes` configuration file - Placed these files in `assets/roocode/` following our established pattern 2. **Enhanced init.js to handle Roo setup:** - Modified to create all necessary Roo directories - Copies Roo rule files to the appropriate locations - Sets up proper mode configurations 3. **Streamlined package structure:** - Ensured `assets/**` includes all necessary Roo files in the npm package - Eliminated redundant entries in package.json - Updated prepare-package.js to verify all required files 4. **Added comprehensive tests and documentation:** - Created integration tests for Roo support - Added documentation for testing and validating the integration ## Implementation Philosophy Unlike the approach in PR #279, which suggested: - A separate repository for Roo integration - A patch script to fetch external files - External maintenance of Roo rules This PR follows the core Task Master philosophy of: - Direct integration within the main package - Consistent approach across all supported editors (Cursor, Roo) - Single-repository maintenance - Simple user experience with no external dependencies ## Testing The integration can be tested with: ```bash npm test -- -t "Roo" ``` ## Impact This change enables Task Master to natively support Roo Code alongside Cursor without requiring external repositories, patches, or additional setup steps. Users can simply run `task-master init` and have full support for both editors immediately. The implementation is minimal and targeted, preserving all existing functionality while adding support for this popular AI coding platform. * Update roo-files-inclusion.test.js * Update README.md * Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json @Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes: 1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder 2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead 3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json 4. ✅ All tests are now passing Regarding architectural concerns: - **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth. - **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations. - **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here]. Let me know if you'd like any additional changes! * Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json @Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes: 1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder 2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead 3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json 4. ✅ All tests are now passing Regarding architectural concerns: - **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth. - **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations. - **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here]. Let me know if you'd like any additional changes! * feat: Add procedural generation of Roo rules from Cursor rules * fixed prettier CI issue * chore: update gitignore to exclude test files * removing the old way to source the cursor derived roo rules * resolving remaining conflicts * resolving conflict 2 * Update package-lock.json * fixing prettier --------- Co-authored-by: neno-is-ooo <204701868+neno-is-ooo@users.noreply.github.com>
Task Master Test Suite
This directory contains tests for the Task Master CLI. The tests are organized into different categories to ensure comprehensive test coverage.
Test Structure
unit/: Unit tests for individual functions and componentsintegration/: Integration tests for testing interactions between componentse2e/: End-to-end tests for testing complete workflowsfixtures/: Test fixtures and sample data
Running Tests
To run all tests:
npm test
To run tests in watch mode (for development):
npm run test:watch
To run tests with coverage reporting:
npm run test:coverage
Testing Approach
Unit Tests
Unit tests focus on testing individual functions and components in isolation. These tests should be fast and should mock external dependencies.
Integration Tests
Integration tests focus on testing interactions between components. These tests ensure that components work together correctly.
End-to-End Tests
End-to-end tests focus on testing complete workflows from a user's perspective. These tests ensure that the CLI works correctly as a whole.
Test Fixtures
Test fixtures provide sample data for tests. Fixtures should be small, focused, and representative of real-world data.
Mocking
For external dependencies like file system operations and API calls, we use mocking to isolate the code being tested.
- File system operations: Use
mock-fsto mock the file system - API calls: Use Jest's mocking capabilities to mock API responses
Test Coverage
We aim for at least 80% test coverage for all code paths. Coverage reports can be generated with:
npm run test:coverage