173 lines
11 KiB
JSON
173 lines
11 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"meta": {
|
|
"generatedAt": "2025-10-06T16:13:59.317Z",
|
|
"tasksAnalyzed": 20,
|
|
"totalTasks": 20,
|
|
"analysisCount": 20,
|
|
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
|
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
|
"usedResearch": false
|
|
},
|
|
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 11,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Create WorkflowOrchestrator Core Service",
|
|
"complexityScore": 9,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the WorkflowOrchestrator into discrete components: 1) State machine core with phase definitions, 2) EventEmitter integration, 3) Persistence layer with checkpoint saving, 4) State recovery and resume functionality, 5) Phase transition logic, 6) Error handling and rollback, 7) Configuration management, 8) Integration with existing services",
|
|
"reasoning": "This is the most complex task requiring a sophisticated state machine, event system, persistence, and integration with multiple adapters. It's the foundation component that orchestrates the entire workflow."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 12,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Test Runner Adapter Service",
|
|
"complexityScore": 7,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Split into: 1) Package.json parser for test script detection, 2) npm/pnpm/yarn runner detection logic, 3) Test execution wrapper with structured output parsing, 4) Coverage report parsing and threshold enforcement, 5) TestResult interface implementation, 6) Integration with different test frameworks (Jest, Vitest, etc.)",
|
|
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to need to support multiple package managers, parse various test output formats, and handle coverage reporting. Framework detection adds complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 13,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Build Git Operations Adapter",
|
|
"complexityScore": 6,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize into: 1) Core git command wrapper using simple-git or child_process, 2) Branch management with naming pattern support, 3) Confirmation gate system for destructive operations, 4) Default branch protection logic, 5) Error handling and command validation",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium complexity - wraps existing git operations but needs careful handling of destructive operations, branch naming patterns, and error scenarios. Existing git utilities can be leveraged."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 14,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Create Autopilot CLI Command",
|
|
"complexityScore": 5,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) Commander.js argument parsing and validation, 2) WorkflowOrchestrator initialization and configuration, 3) Event subscription and UI progress rendering, 4) Signal handling for graceful shutdown and resumability",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium complexity - primarily integration work using existing CLI patterns and orchestrator. Signal handling and event subscription add some complexity but build on established patterns."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 15,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Integrate Surgical Test Generator",
|
|
"complexityScore": 6,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Break into: 1) Agent prompt adapter loading from .claude/agents/, 2) Context formatting for subtask requirements, 3) Executor service integration, 4) Test file writing with project convention detection, 5) Test syntax validation before proceeding",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium-high complexity due to prompt engineering, file system integration, and need to understand project conventions. Test validation adds complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 16,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Code Generation Executor",
|
|
"complexityScore": 7,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize as: 1) Minimal implementation prompt generation, 2) Test failure analysis and context extraction, 3) ExecutorFactory integration for multiple AI providers, 4) Code change parsing and application, 5) Conflict resolution strategies, 6) Change minimization validation",
|
|
"reasoning": "High complexity due to sophisticated prompt engineering, multi-provider support, code parsing, and conflict resolution. Requires understanding of various executor outputs."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 17,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Add Branch and Tag Management Integration",
|
|
"complexityScore": 4,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Split into: 1) Integration with existing tag-management.js for branch-tag mapping, 2) Active tag switching and task filtering logic, 3) Branch naming with tag and task ID inclusion",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower complexity as it builds on existing tag management infrastructure. Primarily integration work with established patterns."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 18,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Build Run State Persistence System",
|
|
"complexityScore": 6,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) Checkpoint schema design and validation, 2) JSONL logging implementation, 3) State serialization and deserialization, 4) Partial state recovery with graceful degradation, 5) File system operations with error handling",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium-high complexity due to data persistence, state management, and recovery scenarios. File I/O and state consistency add complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 19,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Preflight Validation Service",
|
|
"complexityScore": 5,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize into: 1) Git state validation (clean working tree, branch checks), 2) Tool availability detection (test runner, git, gh CLI), 3) API key and executor validation, 4) Task validation with auto-expansion trigger",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium complexity - involves multiple validation checks across different systems. Auto-expansion logic and --force override handling add some complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 20,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Create PR Generation Service",
|
|
"complexityScore": 4,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Break into: 1) gh CLI integration for PR operations, 2) PR title and body formatting with run report integration, 3) Fallback handling when gh unavailable",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower-medium complexity as it primarily formats data and calls external gh CLI. Builds on existing git adapter patterns."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 21,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Add Subtask Selection Logic",
|
|
"complexityScore": 6,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) Dependency resolution algorithm, 2) Status filtering and task ownership logic, 3) Subtask ordering with dependency satisfaction, 4) Status transition management during workflow, 5) Blocked task handling with graceful degradation",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium-high complexity due to dependency graph traversal and status management. The logic builds on existing TaskService.getNextTask() but requires workflow-specific enhancements."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 22,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Test-Driven Commit Gating",
|
|
"complexityScore": 7,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize into: 1) Test execution and result evaluation, 2) Coverage threshold enforcement logic, 3) Commit gating decision logic, 4) Retry mechanism with exponential backoff for flaky tests, 5) Force override functionality, 6) Comprehensive logging of all attempts",
|
|
"reasoning": "High complexity due to sophisticated gating logic, coverage analysis, retry mechanisms, and integration with test runner. Critical for TDD workflow integrity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 23,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Build Progress Event System",
|
|
"complexityScore": 5,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) EventEmitter-based event system design, 2) Event payload standardization with timestamps and metadata, 3) Event aggregation and summary statistics, 4) Event filtering and buffering mechanisms",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium complexity - event system design is well-understood but requires careful payload design and aggregation logic. Builds on Node.js EventEmitter patterns."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 24,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Create Autopilot Configuration Schema",
|
|
"complexityScore": 4,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Break into: 1) Zod schema definition for autopilot configuration, 2) Configuration migration logic for existing projects, 3) Environment variable override support with validation",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower-medium complexity - schema design is straightforward using Zod, and builds on existing config patterns. Migration logic adds some complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 25,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Dry Run Mode",
|
|
"complexityScore": 3,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Split into: 1) Dry run flag propagation throughout workflow components, 2) Output formatting for simulated operations with clear indication",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower complexity - primarily involves adding conditional logic and formatting. Most of the underlying functionality already exists."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 26,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Add tmux Integration Support",
|
|
"complexityScore": 4,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize as: 1) tmux availability detection and command wrapper, 2) Pane management (split, send-keys, capture), 3) Fallback handling for non-tmux environments",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower-medium complexity - wraps tmux commands with graceful fallback. Terminal management adds some complexity but follows established patterns."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 27,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Build Run Report Generator",
|
|
"complexityScore": 5,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) Markdown report generation with formatted tables and summaries, 2) JSON report structure with comprehensive metrics, 3) Chart/table formatting for readability, 4) Report archival and cleanup logic",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium complexity due to multiple output formats, data aggregation, and file management. Report formatting and archival add complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 28,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Add MCP Tools Integration",
|
|
"complexityScore": 3,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Split into: 1) MCP tool availability detection and integration, 2) Fallback to direct service calls when MCP unavailable",
|
|
"reasoning": "Lower complexity - primarily integration work with existing MCP infrastructure. Fallback logic is straightforward."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 29,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Implement Retry and Backoff Logic",
|
|
"complexityScore": 6,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Organize into: 1) Exponential backoff algorithm implementation, 2) Flaky test pattern detection, 3) Circuit breaker for repeated failures, 4) Retry attempt tracking in state, 5) Configurable retry limits and failure categorization",
|
|
"reasoning": "Medium-high complexity due to sophisticated retry algorithms, pattern detection, and state management. Circuit breaker pattern adds complexity."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"taskId": 30,
|
|
"taskTitle": "Create End-to-End Integration Tests",
|
|
"complexityScore": 8,
|
|
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
|
"expansionPrompt": "Structure as: 1) Test fixture creation with mock tasks and repositories, 2) Happy path workflow testing, 3) Retry and failure scenario testing, 4) Resume functionality validation, 5) Multi-executor testing scenarios, 6) Performance benchmarking, 7) Artifact verification (commits, branches, reports)",
|
|
"reasoning": "High complexity due to comprehensive test coverage requirements, multiple scenarios, mock data setup, and integration with many components. Requires testing the entire workflow end-to-end."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |