Adds a new CLI command and MCP tool to reorganize tasks and subtasks within the hierarchy. Features include:
- Moving tasks between different positions in the task list
- Converting tasks to subtasks and vice versa
- Moving subtasks between parents
- Moving multiple tasks at once with comma-separated IDs
- Creating placeholder tasks when moving to new IDs
- Validation to prevent accidental data loss
This is particularly useful for resolving merge conflicts when multiple team members create tasks on different branches.
- Enhance E2E testing and LLM analysis report and:
- Add --analyze-log flag to run_e2e.sh to re-run LLM analysis on existing logs.
- Add test:e2e and analyze-log scripts to package.json for easier execution.
- Correct display errors and dependency validation output:
- Update chalk usage in add-task.js to use bracket notation (chalk[color]) compatible with v5, resolving 'chalk.keyword is not a function' error.
- Modify fix-dependencies command output to show red failure box with issue count instead of green success box when validation fails.
- Refactor interactive model setup:
- Verify inclusion of 'No change' option during interactive model setup flow (task-master models --setup).
- Update model definitions:
- Add max_tokens field for gpt-4o in supported-models.json.
- Remove unused scripts:
- Delete prepare-package.js and rule-transformer.test.js.
Release candidate
- Enhance E2E testing and LLM analysis report and:
- Add --analyze-log flag to run_e2e.sh to re-run LLM analysis on existing logs.
- Add test:e2e and analyze-log scripts to package.json for easier execution.
- Correct display errors and dependency validation output:
- Update chalk usage in add-task.js to use bracket notation (chalk[color]) compatible with v5, resolving 'chalk.keyword is not a function' error.
- Modify fix-dependencies command output to show red failure box with issue count instead of green success box when validation fails.
- Refactor interactive model setup:
- Verify inclusion of 'No change' option during interactive model setup flow (task-master models --setup).
- Update model definitions:
- Add max_tokens field for gpt-4o in supported-models.json.
- Remove unused scripts:
- Delete prepare-package.js and rule-transformer.test.js.
Release candidate
- Add OpenAI provider implementation using @ai-sdk/openai.\n- Update `models` command/tool to display API key status for configured providers.\n- Implement model-specific `maxTokens` override logic in `config-manager.js` using `supported-models.json`.\n- Improve AI error message parsing in `ai-services-unified.js` for better clarity.
- Add OpenAI provider implementation using @ai-sdk/openai.\n- Update `models` command/tool to display API key status for configured providers.\n- Implement model-specific `maxTokens` override logic in `config-manager.js` using `supported-models.json`.\n- Improve AI error message parsing in `ai-services-unified.js` for better clarity.
This commit updates all relevant documentation (READMEs, docs/*, .cursor/rules) to accurately reflect the finalized unified AI service architecture and the new configuration system (.taskmasterconfig + .env/mcp.json). It also includes the final code cleanup steps related to the refactoring.
Key Changes:
1. **Documentation Updates:**
* Revised `README.md`, `README-task-master.md`, `assets/scripts_README.md`, `docs/configuration.md`, and `docs/tutorial.md` to explain the new configuration split (.taskmasterconfig vs .env/mcp.json).
* Updated MCP configuration examples in READMEs and tutorials to only include API keys in the `env` block.
* Added/updated examples for using the `--research` flag in `docs/command-reference.md`, `docs/examples.md`, and `docs/tutorial.md`.
* Updated `.cursor/rules/ai_services.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/architecture.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/mcp.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/taskmaster.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/utilities.mdc`, and `.cursor/rules/new_features.mdc` to align with the new architecture, removing references to old patterns/files.
* Removed internal rule links from user-facing rules (`taskmaster.mdc`, `dev_workflow.mdc`, `self_improve.mdc`).
* Deleted outdated example file `docs/ai-client-utils-example.md`.
2. **Final Code Refactor & Cleanup:**
* Corrected `update-task-by-id.js` by removing the last import from the old `ai-services.js`.
* Refactored `update-subtask-by-id.js` to correctly use the unified service and logger patterns.
* Removed the obsolete export block from `mcp-server/src/core/task-master-core.js`.
* Corrected logger implementation in `update-tasks.js` for CLI context.
* Updated API key mapping in `config-manager.js` and `ai-services-unified.js`.
3. **Configuration Files:**
* Updated API keys in `.cursor/mcp.json`, replacing `GROK_API_KEY` with `XAI_API_KEY`.
* Updated `.env.example` with current API key names.
* Added `azureOpenaiBaseUrl` to `.taskmasterconfig` example.
4. **Task Management:**
* Marked documentation subtask 61.10 as 'done'.
* Includes various other task content/status updates from the diff summary.
5. **Changeset:**
* Added `.changeset/cuddly-zebras-matter.md` for user-facing `expand`/`expand-all` improvements.
This commit concludes the major architectural refactoring (Task 61) and ensures the documentation accurately reflects the current system.
This commit updates all relevant documentation (READMEs, docs/*, .cursor/rules) to accurately reflect the finalized unified AI service architecture and the new configuration system (.taskmasterconfig + .env/mcp.json). It also includes the final code cleanup steps related to the refactoring.
Key Changes:
1. **Documentation Updates:**
* Revised `README.md`, `README-task-master.md`, `assets/scripts_README.md`, `docs/configuration.md`, and `docs/tutorial.md` to explain the new configuration split (.taskmasterconfig vs .env/mcp.json).
* Updated MCP configuration examples in READMEs and tutorials to only include API keys in the `env` block.
* Added/updated examples for using the `--research` flag in `docs/command-reference.md`, `docs/examples.md`, and `docs/tutorial.md`.
* Updated `.cursor/rules/ai_services.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/architecture.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/mcp.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/taskmaster.mdc`, `.cursor/rules/utilities.mdc`, and `.cursor/rules/new_features.mdc` to align with the new architecture, removing references to old patterns/files.
* Removed internal rule links from user-facing rules (`taskmaster.mdc`, `dev_workflow.mdc`, `self_improve.mdc`).
* Deleted outdated example file `docs/ai-client-utils-example.md`.
2. **Final Code Refactor & Cleanup:**
* Corrected `update-task-by-id.js` by removing the last import from the old `ai-services.js`.
* Refactored `update-subtask-by-id.js` to correctly use the unified service and logger patterns.
* Removed the obsolete export block from `mcp-server/src/core/task-master-core.js`.
* Corrected logger implementation in `update-tasks.js` for CLI context.
* Updated API key mapping in `config-manager.js` and `ai-services-unified.js`.
3. **Configuration Files:**
* Updated API keys in `.cursor/mcp.json`, replacing `GROK_API_KEY` with `XAI_API_KEY`.
* Updated `.env.example` with current API key names.
* Added `azureOpenaiBaseUrl` to `.taskmasterconfig` example.
4. **Task Management:**
* Marked documentation subtask 61.10 as 'done'.
* Includes various other task content/status updates from the diff summary.
5. **Changeset:**
* Added `.changeset/cuddly-zebras-matter.md` for user-facing `expand`/`expand-all` improvements.
This commit concludes the major architectural refactoring (Task 61) and ensures the documentation accurately reflects the current system.
* Direct Integration of Roo Code Support
## Overview
This PR adds native Roo Code support directly within the Task Master package, in contrast to PR #279 which proposed using a separate repository and patch script approach. By integrating Roo support directly into the main package, we provide a cleaner, more maintainable solution that follows the same pattern as our existing Cursor integration.
## Key Changes
1. **Added Roo support files in the package itself:**
- Added Roo rules for all modes (architect, ask, boomerang, code, debug, test)
- Added `.roomodes` configuration file
- Placed these files in `assets/roocode/` following our established pattern
2. **Enhanced init.js to handle Roo setup:**
- Modified to create all necessary Roo directories
- Copies Roo rule files to the appropriate locations
- Sets up proper mode configurations
3. **Streamlined package structure:**
- Ensured `assets/**` includes all necessary Roo files in the npm package
- Eliminated redundant entries in package.json
- Updated prepare-package.js to verify all required files
4. **Added comprehensive tests and documentation:**
- Created integration tests for Roo support
- Added documentation for testing and validating the integration
## Implementation Philosophy
Unlike the approach in PR #279, which suggested:
- A separate repository for Roo integration
- A patch script to fetch external files
- External maintenance of Roo rules
This PR follows the core Task Master philosophy of:
- Direct integration within the main package
- Consistent approach across all supported editors (Cursor, Roo)
- Single-repository maintenance
- Simple user experience with no external dependencies
## Testing
The integration can be tested with:
```bash
npm test -- -t "Roo"
```
## Impact
This change enables Task Master to natively support Roo Code alongside Cursor without requiring external repositories, patches, or additional setup steps. Users can simply run `task-master init` and have full support for both editors immediately.
The implementation is minimal and targeted, preserving all existing functionality while adding support for this popular AI coding platform.
* Update roo-files-inclusion.test.js
* Update README.md
* Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json
@Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes:
1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder
2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead
3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json
4. ✅ All tests are now passing
Regarding architectural concerns:
- **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth.
- **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations.
- **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here].
Let me know if you'd like any additional changes!
* Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json
@Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes:
1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder
2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead
3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json
4. ✅ All tests are now passing
Regarding architectural concerns:
- **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth.
- **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations.
- **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here].
Let me know if you'd like any additional changes!
* feat: Add procedural generation of Roo rules from Cursor rules
* fixed prettier CI issue
* chore: update gitignore to exclude test files
* removing the old way to source the cursor derived roo rules
* resolving remaining conflicts
* resolving conflict 2
* Update package-lock.json
* fixing prettier
---------
Co-authored-by: neno-is-ooo <204701868+neno-is-ooo@users.noreply.github.com>
* Direct Integration of Roo Code Support
## Overview
This PR adds native Roo Code support directly within the Task Master package, in contrast to PR #279 which proposed using a separate repository and patch script approach. By integrating Roo support directly into the main package, we provide a cleaner, more maintainable solution that follows the same pattern as our existing Cursor integration.
## Key Changes
1. **Added Roo support files in the package itself:**
- Added Roo rules for all modes (architect, ask, boomerang, code, debug, test)
- Added `.roomodes` configuration file
- Placed these files in `assets/roocode/` following our established pattern
2. **Enhanced init.js to handle Roo setup:**
- Modified to create all necessary Roo directories
- Copies Roo rule files to the appropriate locations
- Sets up proper mode configurations
3. **Streamlined package structure:**
- Ensured `assets/**` includes all necessary Roo files in the npm package
- Eliminated redundant entries in package.json
- Updated prepare-package.js to verify all required files
4. **Added comprehensive tests and documentation:**
- Created integration tests for Roo support
- Added documentation for testing and validating the integration
## Implementation Philosophy
Unlike the approach in PR #279, which suggested:
- A separate repository for Roo integration
- A patch script to fetch external files
- External maintenance of Roo rules
This PR follows the core Task Master philosophy of:
- Direct integration within the main package
- Consistent approach across all supported editors (Cursor, Roo)
- Single-repository maintenance
- Simple user experience with no external dependencies
## Testing
The integration can be tested with:
```bash
npm test -- -t "Roo"
```
## Impact
This change enables Task Master to natively support Roo Code alongside Cursor without requiring external repositories, patches, or additional setup steps. Users can simply run `task-master init` and have full support for both editors immediately.
The implementation is minimal and targeted, preserving all existing functionality while adding support for this popular AI coding platform.
* Update roo-files-inclusion.test.js
* Update README.md
* Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json
@Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes:
1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder
2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead
3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json
4. ✅ All tests are now passing
Regarding architectural concerns:
- **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth.
- **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations.
- **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here].
Let me know if you'd like any additional changes!
* Address PR feedback: move docs to contributor-docs, fix package.json references, regenerate package-lock.json
@Crunchyman-ralph Thank you for the feedback! I've made the requested changes:
1. ✅ Moved testing-roo-integration.md to the contributor-docs folder
2. ✅ Removed manual package.json changes and used changeset instead
3. ✅ Fixed package references and regenerated package-lock.json
4. ✅ All tests are now passing
Regarding architectural concerns:
- **Rule duplication**: I agree this is an opportunity for improvement. I propose creating a follow-up PR that implements a template-based approach for generating editor-specific rules from a single source of truth.
- **Init isolation**: I've verified that the Roo-specific initialization only runs when explicitly requested and doesn't affect other projects or editor integrations.
- **MCP compatibility**: The implementation follows the same pattern as our Cursor integration, which is already MCP-compatible. I've tested this by [describe your testing approach here].
Let me know if you'd like any additional changes!
* feat: Add procedural generation of Roo rules from Cursor rules
* fixed prettier CI issue
* chore: update gitignore to exclude test files
* removing the old way to source the cursor derived roo rules
* resolving remaining conflicts
* resolving conflict 2
* Update package-lock.json
* fixing prettier
---------
Co-authored-by: neno-is-ooo <204701868+neno-is-ooo@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit refactors how the MCP server determines the project root directory, prioritizing the path provided by the client session (e.g., Cursor) for increased reliability and simplification.
Previously, project root discovery relied on a complex chain of fallbacks (environment variables, CWD searching, package path checks) within `findTasksJsonPath`. This could be brittle and less accurate when running within an integrated environment like Cursor.
Key changes:
- **Prioritize Session Roots:** MCP tools (`add-task`, `add-dependency`, etc.) now first attempt to extract the project root URI directly from `session.roots[0].uri`.
- **New Utility `getProjectRootFromSession`:** Added a utility function in `mcp-server/src/tools/utils.js` to encapsulate the logic for extracting and decoding the root URI from the session object.
- **Refactor MCP Tools:** Updated tools (`add-task.js`, `add-dependency.js`) to use `getProjectRootFromSession`.
- **Simplify `findTasksJsonPath`:** Prioritized `args.projectRoot`, removed checks for `TASK_MASTER_PROJECT_ROOT` env var and package directory fallback. Retained CWD search and cache check for CLI compatibility.
- **Fix `reportProgress` Usage:** Corrected parameters in `add-dependency.js`.
This change makes project root determination more robust for the MCP server while preserving discovery mechanisms for the standalone CLI.
