chore: moves to new task master config setup
This commit is contained in:
Eyal Toledano
568
.taskmaster/docs/README.md
Normal file
568
.taskmaster/docs/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
|
||||
# Meta-Development Script
|
||||
|
||||
This folder contains a **meta-development script** (`dev.js`) and related utilities that manage tasks for an AI-driven or traditional software development workflow. The script revolves around a `tasks.json` file, which holds an up-to-date list of development tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
In an AI-driven development process—particularly with tools like [Cursor](https://www.cursor.so/)—it's beneficial to have a **single source of truth** for tasks. This script allows you to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse** a PRD or requirements document (`.txt`) to initialize a set of tasks (`tasks.json`).
|
||||
2. **List** all existing tasks (IDs, statuses, titles).
|
||||
3. **Update** tasks to accommodate new prompts or architecture changes (useful if you discover "implementation drift").
|
||||
4. **Generate** individual task files (e.g., `task_001.txt`) for easy reference or to feed into an AI coding workflow.
|
||||
5. **Set task status**—mark tasks as `done`, `pending`, or `deferred` based on progress.
|
||||
6. **Expand** tasks with subtasks—break down complex tasks into smaller, more manageable subtasks.
|
||||
7. **Research-backed subtask generation**—use Perplexity AI to generate more informed and contextually relevant subtasks.
|
||||
8. **Clear subtasks**—remove subtasks from specified tasks to allow regeneration or restructuring.
|
||||
9. **Show task details**—display detailed information about a specific task and its subtasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
The script can be configured through environment variables in a `.env` file at the root of the project:
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
- `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`: Your Anthropic API key for Claude
|
||||
|
||||
### Optional Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
- `MODEL`: Specify which Claude model to use (default: "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219")
|
||||
- `MAX_TOKENS`: Maximum tokens for model responses (default: 4000)
|
||||
- `TEMPERATURE`: Temperature for model responses (default: 0.7)
|
||||
- `PERPLEXITY_API_KEY`: Your Perplexity API key for research-backed subtask generation
|
||||
- `PERPLEXITY_MODEL`: Specify which Perplexity model to use (default: "sonar-medium-online")
|
||||
- `DEBUG`: Enable debug logging (default: false)
|
||||
- `TASKMASTER_LOG_LEVEL`: Log level - debug, info, warn, error (default: info)
|
||||
- `DEFAULT_SUBTASKS`: Default number of subtasks when expanding (default: 3)
|
||||
- `DEFAULT_PRIORITY`: Default priority for generated tasks (default: medium)
|
||||
- `PROJECT_NAME`: Override default project name in tasks.json
|
||||
- `PROJECT_VERSION`: Override default version in tasks.json
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`tasks.json`**:
|
||||
|
||||
- A JSON file at the project root containing an array of tasks (each with `id`, `title`, `description`, `status`, etc.).
|
||||
- The `meta` field can store additional info like the project's name, version, or reference to the PRD.
|
||||
- Tasks can have `subtasks` for more detailed implementation steps.
|
||||
- Dependencies are displayed with status indicators (✅ for completed, ⏱️ for pending) to easily track progress.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Script Commands**
|
||||
You can run the script via:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js [command] [options]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Available commands:
|
||||
|
||||
- `parse-prd`: Generate tasks from a PRD document
|
||||
- `list`: Display all tasks with their status
|
||||
- `update`: Update tasks based on new information
|
||||
- `generate`: Create individual task files
|
||||
- `set-status`: Change a task's status
|
||||
- `expand`: Add subtasks to a task or all tasks
|
||||
- `clear-subtasks`: Remove subtasks from specified tasks
|
||||
- `next`: Determine the next task to work on based on dependencies
|
||||
- `show`: Display detailed information about a specific task
|
||||
|
||||
Run `node scripts/dev.js` without arguments to see detailed usage information.
|
||||
|
||||
## Listing Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
The `list` command allows you to view all tasks and their status:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# List all tasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js list
|
||||
|
||||
# List tasks with a specific status
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js list --status=pending
|
||||
|
||||
# List tasks and include their subtasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js list --with-subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
# List tasks with a specific status and include their subtasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js list --status=pending --with-subtasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Updating Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
The `update` command allows you to update tasks based on new information or implementation changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Update tasks starting from ID 4 with a new prompt
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update --from=4 --prompt="Refactor tasks from ID 4 onward to use Express instead of Fastify"
|
||||
|
||||
# Update all tasks (default from=1)
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update --prompt="Add authentication to all relevant tasks"
|
||||
|
||||
# With research-backed updates using Perplexity AI
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update --from=4 --prompt="Integrate OAuth 2.0" --research
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a different tasks file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update --file=custom-tasks.json --from=5 --prompt="Change database from MongoDB to PostgreSQL"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `--prompt` parameter is required and should explain the changes or new context
|
||||
- Only tasks that aren't marked as 'done' will be updated
|
||||
- Tasks with ID >= the specified --from value will be updated
|
||||
- The `--research` flag uses Perplexity AI for more informed updates when available
|
||||
|
||||
## Updating a Single Task
|
||||
|
||||
The `update-task` command allows you to update a specific task instead of multiple tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Update a specific task with new information
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update-task --id=4 --prompt="Use JWT for authentication"
|
||||
|
||||
# With research-backed updates using Perplexity AI
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js update-task --id=4 --prompt="Use JWT for authentication" --research
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This command:
|
||||
|
||||
- Updates only the specified task rather than a range of tasks
|
||||
- Provides detailed validation with helpful error messages
|
||||
- Checks for required API keys when using research mode
|
||||
- Falls back gracefully if Perplexity API is unavailable
|
||||
- Preserves tasks that are already marked as "done"
|
||||
- Includes contextual error handling for common issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Setting Task Status
|
||||
|
||||
The `set-status` command allows you to change a task's status:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Mark a task as done
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js set-status --id=3 --status=done
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark a task as pending
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js set-status --id=4 --status=pending
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark a specific subtask as done
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js set-status --id=3.1 --status=done
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark multiple tasks at once
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js set-status --id=1,2,3 --status=done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- When marking a parent task as "done", all of its subtasks will automatically be marked as "done" as well
|
||||
- Common status values are 'done', 'pending', and 'deferred', but any string is accepted
|
||||
- You can specify multiple task IDs by separating them with commas
|
||||
- Subtask IDs are specified using the format `parentId.subtaskId` (e.g., `3.1`)
|
||||
- Dependencies are updated to show completion status (✅ for completed, ⏱️ for pending) throughout the system
|
||||
|
||||
## Expanding Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
The `expand` command allows you to break down tasks into subtasks for more detailed implementation:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Expand a specific task with 3 subtasks (default)
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=3
|
||||
|
||||
# Expand a specific task with 5 subtasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=3 --num=5
|
||||
|
||||
# Expand a task with additional context
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=3 --prompt="Focus on security aspects"
|
||||
|
||||
# Expand all pending tasks that don't have subtasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --all
|
||||
|
||||
# Force regeneration of subtasks for all pending tasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --all --force
|
||||
|
||||
# Use Perplexity AI for research-backed subtask generation
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=3 --research
|
||||
|
||||
# Use Perplexity AI for research-backed generation on all pending tasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --all --research
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Clearing Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
The `clear-subtasks` command allows you to remove subtasks from specified tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Clear subtasks from a specific task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js clear-subtasks --id=3
|
||||
|
||||
# Clear subtasks from multiple tasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js clear-subtasks --id=1,2,3
|
||||
|
||||
# Clear subtasks from all tasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js clear-subtasks --all
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- After clearing subtasks, task files are automatically regenerated
|
||||
- This is useful when you want to regenerate subtasks with a different approach
|
||||
- Can be combined with the `expand` command to immediately generate new subtasks
|
||||
- Works with both parent tasks and individual subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
## AI Integration
|
||||
|
||||
The script integrates with two AI services:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Anthropic Claude**: Used for parsing PRDs, generating tasks, and creating subtasks.
|
||||
2. **Perplexity AI**: Used for research-backed subtask generation when the `--research` flag is specified.
|
||||
|
||||
The Perplexity integration uses the OpenAI client to connect to Perplexity's API, which provides enhanced research capabilities for generating more informed subtasks. If the Perplexity API is unavailable or encounters an error, the script will automatically fall back to using Anthropic's Claude.
|
||||
|
||||
To use the Perplexity integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Obtain a Perplexity API key
|
||||
2. Add `PERPLEXITY_API_KEY` to your `.env` file
|
||||
3. Optionally specify `PERPLEXITY_MODEL` in your `.env` file (default: "sonar-medium-online")
|
||||
4. Use the `--research` flag with the `expand` command
|
||||
|
||||
## Logging
|
||||
|
||||
The script supports different logging levels controlled by the `TASKMASTER_LOG_LEVEL` environment variable:
|
||||
|
||||
- `debug`: Detailed information, typically useful for troubleshooting
|
||||
- `info`: Confirmation that things are working as expected (default)
|
||||
- `warn`: Warning messages that don't prevent execution
|
||||
- `error`: Error messages that might prevent execution
|
||||
|
||||
When `DEBUG=true` is set, debug logs are also written to a `dev-debug.log` file in the project root.
|
||||
|
||||
## Managing Task Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
The `add-dependency` and `remove-dependency` commands allow you to manage task dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Add a dependency to a task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js add-dependency --id=<id> --depends-on=<id>
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove a dependency from a task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js remove-dependency --id=<id> --depends-on=<id>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These commands:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Allow precise dependency management**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Add dependencies between tasks with automatic validation
|
||||
- Remove dependencies when they're no longer needed
|
||||
- Update task files automatically after changes
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Include validation checks**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Prevent circular dependencies (a task depending on itself)
|
||||
- Prevent duplicate dependencies
|
||||
- Verify that both tasks exist before adding/removing dependencies
|
||||
- Check if dependencies exist before attempting to remove them
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Provide clear feedback**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Success messages confirm when dependencies are added/removed
|
||||
- Error messages explain why operations failed (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Automatically update task files**:
|
||||
- Regenerates task files to reflect dependency changes
|
||||
- Ensures tasks and their files stay synchronized
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Validation and Fixing
|
||||
|
||||
The script provides two specialized commands to ensure task dependencies remain valid and properly maintained:
|
||||
|
||||
### Validating Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
The `validate-dependencies` command allows you to check for invalid dependencies without making changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for invalid dependencies in tasks.json
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js validate-dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a different tasks file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js validate-dependencies --file=custom-tasks.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This command:
|
||||
|
||||
- Scans all tasks and subtasks for non-existent dependencies
|
||||
- Identifies potential self-dependencies (tasks referencing themselves)
|
||||
- Reports all found issues without modifying files
|
||||
- Provides a comprehensive summary of dependency state
|
||||
- Gives detailed statistics on task dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Use this command to audit your task structure before applying fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Fixing Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
The `fix-dependencies` command proactively finds and fixes all invalid dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find and fix all invalid dependencies
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js fix-dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a different tasks file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js fix-dependencies --file=custom-tasks.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This command:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Validates all dependencies** across tasks and subtasks
|
||||
2. **Automatically removes**:
|
||||
- References to non-existent tasks and subtasks
|
||||
- Self-dependencies (tasks depending on themselves)
|
||||
3. **Fixes issues in both**:
|
||||
- The tasks.json data structure
|
||||
- Individual task files during regeneration
|
||||
4. **Provides a detailed report**:
|
||||
- Types of issues fixed (non-existent vs. self-dependencies)
|
||||
- Number of tasks affected (tasks vs. subtasks)
|
||||
- Where fixes were applied (tasks.json vs. task files)
|
||||
- List of all individual fixes made
|
||||
|
||||
This is especially useful when tasks have been deleted or IDs have changed, potentially breaking dependency chains.
|
||||
|
||||
## Analyzing Task Complexity
|
||||
|
||||
The `analyze-complexity` command allows you to automatically assess task complexity and generate expansion recommendations:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Analyze all tasks and generate expansion recommendations
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a custom output file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity --output=custom-report.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Override the model used for analysis
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity --model=claude-3-opus-20240229
|
||||
|
||||
# Set a custom complexity threshold (1-10)
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity --threshold=6
|
||||
|
||||
# Use Perplexity AI for research-backed complexity analysis
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity --research
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- The command uses Claude to analyze each task's complexity (or Perplexity with --research flag)
|
||||
- Tasks are scored on a scale of 1-10
|
||||
- Each task receives a recommended number of subtasks based on DEFAULT_SUBTASKS configuration
|
||||
- The default output path is `scripts/task-complexity-report.json`
|
||||
- Each task in the analysis includes a ready-to-use `expansionCommand` that can be copied directly to the terminal or executed programmatically
|
||||
- Tasks with complexity scores below the threshold (default: 5) may not need expansion
|
||||
- The research flag provides more contextual and informed complexity assessments
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Expand Command
|
||||
|
||||
The `expand` command automatically checks for and uses complexity analysis if available:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Expand a task, using complexity report recommendations if available
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=8
|
||||
|
||||
# Expand all tasks, prioritizing by complexity score if a report exists
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --all
|
||||
|
||||
# Override recommendations with explicit values
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=8 --num=5 --prompt="Custom prompt"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When a complexity report exists:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `expand` command will use the recommended subtask count from the report (unless overridden)
|
||||
- It will use the tailored expansion prompt from the report (unless a custom prompt is provided)
|
||||
- When using `--all`, tasks are sorted by complexity score (highest first)
|
||||
- The `--research` flag is preserved from the complexity analysis to expansion
|
||||
|
||||
The output report structure is:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2023-06-15T12:34:56.789Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 20,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Your Project Name",
|
||||
"usedResearch": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 8,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Develop Implementation Drift Handling",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9.5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Create subtasks that handle detecting...",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task requires sophisticated logic...",
|
||||
"expansionCommand": "node scripts/dev.js expand --id=8 --num=6 --prompt=\"Create subtasks...\" --research"
|
||||
}
|
||||
// More tasks sorted by complexity score (highest first)
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding the Next Task
|
||||
|
||||
The `next` command helps you determine which task to work on next based on dependencies and status:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show the next task to work on
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js next
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a different tasks file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js next --file=custom-tasks.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This command:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identifies all **eligible tasks** - pending or in-progress tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied (marked as done)
|
||||
2. **Prioritizes** these eligible tasks by:
|
||||
- Priority level (high > medium > low)
|
||||
- Number of dependencies (fewer dependencies first)
|
||||
- Task ID (lower ID first)
|
||||
3. **Displays** comprehensive information about the selected task:
|
||||
- Basic task details (ID, title, priority, dependencies)
|
||||
- Detailed description and implementation details
|
||||
- Subtasks if they exist
|
||||
4. Provides **contextual suggested actions**:
|
||||
- Command to mark the task as in-progress
|
||||
- Command to mark the task as done when completed
|
||||
- Commands for working with subtasks (update status or expand)
|
||||
|
||||
This feature ensures you're always working on the most appropriate task based on your project's current state and dependency structure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Showing Task Details
|
||||
|
||||
The `show` command allows you to view detailed information about a specific task:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show details for a specific task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js show 1
|
||||
|
||||
# Alternative syntax with --id option
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js show --id=1
|
||||
|
||||
# Show details for a subtask
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js show --id=1.2
|
||||
|
||||
# Specify a different tasks file
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js show 3 --file=custom-tasks.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This command:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Displays comprehensive information** about the specified task:
|
||||
- Basic task details (ID, title, priority, dependencies, status)
|
||||
- Full description and implementation details
|
||||
- Test strategy information
|
||||
- Subtasks if they exist
|
||||
2. **Handles both regular tasks and subtasks**:
|
||||
- For regular tasks, shows all subtasks and their status
|
||||
- For subtasks, shows the parent task relationship
|
||||
3. **Provides contextual suggested actions**:
|
||||
- Commands to update the task status
|
||||
- Commands for working with subtasks
|
||||
- For subtasks, provides a link to view the parent task
|
||||
|
||||
This command is particularly useful when you need to examine a specific task in detail before implementing it or when you want to check the status and details of a particular task.
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhanced Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
The script now includes improved error handling throughout all commands:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Detailed Validation**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Required parameters (like task IDs and prompts) are validated early
|
||||
- File existence is checked with customized errors for common scenarios
|
||||
- Parameter type conversion is handled with clear error messages
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Contextual Error Messages**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Task not found errors include suggestions to run the list command
|
||||
- API key errors include reminders to check environment variables
|
||||
- Invalid ID format errors show the expected format
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Command-Specific Help Displays**:
|
||||
|
||||
- When validation fails, detailed help for the specific command is shown
|
||||
- Help displays include usage examples and parameter descriptions
|
||||
- Formatted in clear, color-coded boxes with examples
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Helpful Error Recovery**:
|
||||
- Detailed troubleshooting steps for common errors
|
||||
- Graceful fallbacks for missing optional dependencies
|
||||
- Clear instructions for how to fix configuration issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Version Checking
|
||||
|
||||
The script now automatically checks for updates without slowing down execution:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Background Version Checking**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Non-blocking version checks run in the background while commands execute
|
||||
- Actual command execution isn't delayed by version checking
|
||||
- Update notifications appear after command completion
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update Notifications**:
|
||||
|
||||
- When a newer version is available, a notification is displayed
|
||||
- Notifications include current version, latest version, and update command
|
||||
- Formatted in an attention-grabbing box with clear instructions
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Implementation Details**:
|
||||
- Uses semantic versioning to compare current and latest versions
|
||||
- Fetches version information from npm registry with a timeout
|
||||
- Gracefully handles connection issues without affecting command execution
|
||||
|
||||
## Subtask Management
|
||||
|
||||
The script now includes enhanced commands for managing subtasks:
|
||||
|
||||
### Adding Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Add a subtask to an existing task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js add-subtask --parent=5 --title="Implement login UI" --description="Create login form"
|
||||
|
||||
# Convert an existing task to a subtask
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js add-subtask --parent=5 --task-id=8
|
||||
|
||||
# Add a subtask with dependencies
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js add-subtask --parent=5 --title="Authentication middleware" --dependencies=5.1,5.2
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip regenerating task files
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js add-subtask --parent=5 --title="Login API route" --skip-generate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Key features:
|
||||
|
||||
- Create new subtasks with detailed properties or convert existing tasks
|
||||
- Define dependencies between subtasks
|
||||
- Set custom status for new subtasks
|
||||
- Provides next-step suggestions after creation
|
||||
|
||||
### Removing Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Remove a subtask
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js remove-subtask --id=5.2
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove multiple subtasks
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js remove-subtask --id=5.2,5.3,5.4
|
||||
|
||||
# Convert a subtask to a standalone task
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js remove-subtask --id=5.2 --convert
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip regenerating task files
|
||||
node scripts/dev.js remove-subtask --id=5.2 --skip-generate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Key features:
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove subtasks individually or in batches
|
||||
- Optionally convert subtasks to standalone tasks
|
||||
- Control whether task files are regenerated
|
||||
- Provides detailed success messages and next steps
|
||||
@@ -1,357 +1,373 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2025-05-22T05:48:33.026Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 6,
|
||||
"totalTasks": 88,
|
||||
"analysisCount": 43,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
||||
"usedResearch": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 24,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement AI-Powered Test Generation Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the implementation of the AI-powered test generation command into detailed subtasks covering: command structure setup, AI prompt engineering, test file generation logic, integration with Claude API, and comprehensive error handling.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves complex integration with an AI service (Claude), requires sophisticated prompt engineering, and needs to generate structured code files. The existing 3 subtasks are a good start but could be expanded to include more detailed steps for AI integration, error handling, and test file formatting."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 26,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Context Foundation for AI Operations",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing the context foundation appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or integration with existing systems.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a foundation for context integration with several well-defined components. The existing 4 subtasks cover the main implementation areas (context-file flag, cursor rules integration, context extraction utility, and command handler updates). The complexity is moderate as it requires careful integration with existing systems but has clear requirements."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 27,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Context Enhancements for AI Operations",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing context enhancements appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task builds upon the foundation from Task #26 and adds more sophisticated context handling features. The 4 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas (code context extraction, task history context, PRD context integration, and context formatting). The complexity is higher than the foundation task due to the need for intelligent context selection and optimization."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 28,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Advanced ContextManager System",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the advanced ContextManager system appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or backward compatibility with previous context implementations.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task represents the most complex phase of the context implementation, requiring a sophisticated class design, optimization algorithms, and integration with multiple systems. The 5 existing subtasks cover the core implementation areas, but the complexity is high due to the need for intelligent context prioritization, token management, and performance monitoring."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 40,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement 'plan' Command for Task Implementation Planning",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing the 'plan' command appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or integration with existing task management workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new command that leverages AI to generate implementation plans. The existing 4 subtasks cover the main implementation areas (retrieving task content, generating plans with AI, formatting in XML, and error handling). The complexity is moderate as it builds on existing patterns for task updates but requires careful AI integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 41,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Visual Task Dependency Graph in Terminal",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 10,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 10 subtasks for implementing the visual task dependency graph appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance optimization with large graphs or additional visualization options.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated visualization system for terminal display, which is inherently complex due to layout algorithms, ASCII/Unicode rendering, and handling complex dependency relationships. The 10 existing subtasks cover all major aspects of implementation, from CLI interface to accessibility features."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 42,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement MCP-to-MCP Communication Protocol",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for implementing the MCP-to-MCP communication protocol appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security hardening, performance optimization, or comprehensive documentation.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves designing and implementing a complex communication protocol between different MCP tools and servers. It requires sophisticated adapter patterns, client-server architecture, and handling of multiple operational modes. The complexity is very high due to the need for standardization, security, and backward compatibility."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 44,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Task Automation with Webhooks and Event Triggers",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for implementing task automation with webhooks appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security testing, rate limiting implementation, or webhook monitoring tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated event system with webhooks for integration with external services. The complexity is high due to the need for secure authentication, reliable delivery mechanisms, and handling of various webhook formats and protocols. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas but security and monitoring could be emphasized more."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 45,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement GitHub Issue Import Feature",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the GitHub issue import feature appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling GitHub API rate limiting, caching, or supporting additional issue metadata.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves integrating with the GitHub API to import issues as tasks. The complexity is moderate as it requires API authentication, data mapping, and error handling. The existing 5 subtasks cover the main implementation areas from design to end-to-end implementation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 46,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement ICE Analysis Command for Task Prioritization",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the ICE analysis command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for visualization of ICE scores or integration with other prioritization methods.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating an AI-powered analysis system for task prioritization using the ICE methodology. The complexity is high due to the need for sophisticated scoring algorithms, AI integration, and report generation. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from algorithm design to integration with existing systems."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 47,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Task Suggestion Actions Card Workflow",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for enhancing the task suggestion actions card workflow appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for user testing, accessibility improvements, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves redesigning the UI workflow for task expansion and management. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful UX design and state management but builds on existing components. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from design to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 48,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Refactor Prompts into Centralized Structure",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 3 subtasks for refactoring prompts into a centralized structure appear appropriate. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for prompt versioning, documentation, or testing.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a straightforward refactoring to improve code organization. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves moving code rather than creating new functionality. The 3 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from directory structure to integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 49,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Code Quality Analysis Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the code quality analysis command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance optimization with large codebases or integration with existing code quality tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated code analysis system with pattern recognition, best practice verification, and AI-powered recommendations. The complexity is high due to the need for code parsing, complex analysis algorithms, and integration with AI services. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from algorithm design to user interface."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 50,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Test Coverage Tracking System by Task",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the test coverage tracking system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for integration with CI/CD systems, performance optimization, or visualization tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a complex system that maps test coverage to specific tasks and subtasks. The complexity is very high due to the need for sophisticated data structures, integration with coverage tools, and AI-powered test generation. The existing subtasks are comprehensive and cover the main implementation areas from data structure design to AI integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 51,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Perplexity Research Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the Perplexity research command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for caching optimization, result formatting, or integration with other research tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new command that integrates with the Perplexity AI API for research. The complexity is moderate as it requires API integration, context extraction, and result formatting. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from API client to caching system."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 52,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Task Suggestion Command for CLI",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the task suggestion command appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for suggestion quality evaluation, user feedback collection, or integration with existing task workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new CLI command that generates contextually relevant task suggestions using AI. The complexity is moderate as it requires AI integration, context collection, and interactive CLI interfaces. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from data collection to user interface."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 53,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Subtask Suggestion Feature for Parent Tasks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the subtask suggestion feature appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for suggestion quality metrics, user feedback collection, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a feature that suggests contextually relevant subtasks for parent tasks. The complexity is moderate as it builds on existing task management systems but requires sophisticated AI integration and context analysis. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from validation to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 55,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Positional Arguments Support for CLI Commands",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing positional arguments support appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for backward compatibility testing, documentation updates, or user experience improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves modifying the command parsing logic to support positional arguments alongside the existing flag-based syntax. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful handling of different argument styles and edge cases. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from analysis to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 57,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Task-Master CLI User Experience and Interface",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for enhancing the CLI user experience appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for accessibility testing, internationalization, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a significant overhaul of the CLI interface to improve user experience. The complexity is high due to the breadth of changes (logging, visual elements, interactive components, etc.) and the need for consistent design across all commands. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from log management to help systems."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 60,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Mentor System with Round-Table Discussion Feature",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for implementing the mentor system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for mentor personality consistency, discussion quality evaluation, or performance optimization with multiple mentors.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated mentor simulation system with round-table discussions. The complexity is high due to the need for personality simulation, complex LLM integration, and structured discussion management. The 7 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from architecture to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 62,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add --simple Flag to Update Commands for Direct Text Input",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for implementing the --simple flag appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for user experience testing or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves adding a simple flag option to bypass AI processing for updates. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves modifying existing command handlers and adding a flag. The 8 existing subtasks are very detailed and cover all aspects of implementation from command parsing to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 63,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add pnpm Support for the Taskmaster Package",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for adding pnpm support appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for CI/CD integration, performance comparison, or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves ensuring the package works correctly with pnpm as an alternative package manager. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful testing of installation processes and scripts across different environments. The 8 existing subtasks cover all major aspects from documentation to binary verification."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 64,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add Yarn Support for Taskmaster Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 9,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 9 subtasks for adding Yarn support appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance testing, CI/CD integration, or compatibility with different Yarn versions.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves ensuring the package works correctly with Yarn as an alternative package manager. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful testing of installation processes and scripts across different environments. The 9 existing subtasks are very detailed and cover all aspects from configuration to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 65,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add Bun Support for Taskmaster Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for adding Bun support appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling Bun-specific issues, performance testing, or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves adding support for the newer Bun package manager. The complexity is slightly higher than the other package manager tasks due to Bun's differences from Node.js and potential compatibility issues. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from research to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 67,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add CLI JSON output and Cursor keybindings integration",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing JSON output and Cursor keybindings appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing across different operating systems, documentation updates, or user experience improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves two distinct features: adding JSON output to CLI commands and creating a keybindings installation command. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful handling of different output formats and OS-specific file paths. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas for both features."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 68,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Ability to create tasks without parsing PRD",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 2 subtasks for implementing task creation without PRD appear appropriate. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for validation, error handling, or integration with existing task management workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a relatively simple modification to allow task creation without requiring a PRD document. The complexity is low as it primarily involves creating a form interface and saving functionality. The 2 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas of UI design and data saving."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 72,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement PDF Generation for Project Progress and Dependency Overview",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing PDF generation appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling large projects, additional visualization options, or integration with existing reporting tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a feature to generate PDF reports of project progress and dependency visualization. The complexity is high due to the need for PDF generation, data collection, and visualization integration. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from library selection to export options."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 75,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Integrate Google Search Grounding for Research Role",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for integrating Google Search Grounding appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing with different query types, error handling, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves updating the AI service layer to enable Google Search Grounding for research roles. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful integration with the existing AI service architecture and conditional logic. The 4 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from service layer modification to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 76,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Develop E2E Test Framework for Taskmaster MCP Server (FastMCP over stdio)",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for developing the E2E test framework appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for test result reporting, CI/CD integration, or performance benchmarking.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated end-to-end testing framework for the MCP server. The complexity is high due to the need for subprocess management, protocol handling, and robust test case definition. The 7 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from architecture to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 77,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement AI Usage Telemetry for Taskmaster (with external analytics endpoint)",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 18,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 18 subtasks for implementing AI usage telemetry appear very comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security hardening, privacy compliance, or user feedback collection.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a telemetry system to track AI usage metrics. The complexity is high due to the need for secure data transmission, comprehensive data collection, and integration across multiple commands. The 18 existing subtasks are extremely detailed and cover all aspects of implementation from core utility to provider-specific updates."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 80,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Unique User ID Generation and Storage During Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing unique user ID generation appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for privacy compliance, security auditing, or integration with the telemetry system.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves generating and storing a unique user identifier during installation. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves UUID generation and configuration file management. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from script structure to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 81,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Task #81: Implement Comprehensive Local Telemetry System with Future Server Integration Capability",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the comprehensive local telemetry system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for data migration, storage optimization, or visualization tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves expanding the telemetry system to capture additional metrics and implement local storage with future server integration capability. The complexity is high due to the breadth of data collection, storage requirements, and privacy considerations. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from data collection to user-facing benefits."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 82,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update supported-models.json with token limit fields",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears straightforward enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on researching accurate token limit values for each model and ensuring backward compatibility.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a simple update to the supported-models.json file to include new token limit fields. The complexity is low as it primarily involves research and data entry. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 83,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update config-manager.js defaults and getters",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears straightforward enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on updating the DEFAULTS object and related getter functions while maintaining backward compatibility.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves updating the config-manager.js module to replace maxTokens with more specific token limit fields. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves modifying existing code rather than creating new functionality. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 84,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement token counting utility",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears well-defined enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on implementing accurate token counting for different models and proper fallback mechanisms.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a utility function to count tokens for different AI models. The complexity is moderate as it requires integration with the tiktoken library and handling different tokenization schemes. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 69,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Analyze Complexity for Specific Task IDs",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the task 'Enhance Analyze Complexity for Specific Task IDs' into 6 subtasks focusing on: 1) Core logic modification to accept ID parameters, 2) Report merging functionality, 3) CLI interface updates, 4) MCP tool integration, 5) Documentation updates, and 6) Comprehensive testing across all components.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves modifying existing functionality across multiple components (core logic, CLI, MCP) with complex logic for filtering tasks and merging reports. The implementation requires careful handling of different parameter combinations and edge cases. The task has interdependent components that need to work together seamlessly, and the report merging functionality adds significant complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 70,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement 'diagram' command for Mermaid diagram generation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the 'diagram' command implementation into 5 subtasks: 1) Command interface and parameter handling, 2) Task data extraction and transformation to Mermaid syntax, 3) Diagram rendering with status color coding, 4) Output formatting and file export functionality, and 5) Error handling and edge case management.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task requires implementing a new feature rather than modifying existing code, which reduces complexity from integration challenges. However, it involves working with visualization logic, dependency mapping, and multiple output formats. The color coding based on status and handling of dependency relationships adds moderate complexity. The task is well-defined but requires careful attention to diagram formatting and error handling."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 85,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update ai-services-unified.js for dynamic token limits",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the update of ai-services-unified.js for dynamic token limits into subtasks such as: (1) Import and integrate the token counting utility, (2) Refactor _unifiedServiceRunner to calculate and enforce dynamic token limits, (3) Update error handling for token limit violations, (4) Add and verify logging for token usage, (5) Write and execute tests for various prompt and model scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves significant code changes to a core function, integration of a new utility, dynamic logic for multiple models, and robust error handling. It also requires comprehensive testing for edge cases and integration, making it moderately complex and best managed by splitting into focused subtasks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 86,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update .taskmasterconfig schema and user guide",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand this task into subtasks: (1) Draft a migration guide for users, (2) Update user documentation to explain new config fields, (3) Modify schema validation logic in config-manager.js, (4) Test and validate backward compatibility and error messaging.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "The task spans documentation, schema changes, migration guidance, and validation logic. While not algorithmically complex, it requires careful coordination and thorough testing to ensure a smooth user transition and robust validation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 87,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement validation and error handling",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose this task into: (1) Add validation logic for model and config loading, (2) Implement error handling and fallback mechanisms, (3) Enhance logging and reporting for token usage, (4) Develop helper functions for configuration suggestions and improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task is primarily about adding validation, error handling, and logging. While important for robustness, the logic is straightforward and can be modularized into a few clear subtasks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 89,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Introduce Prioritize Command with Enhanced Priority Levels",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand this task into: (1) Implement the prioritize command with all required flags and shorthands, (2) Update CLI output and help documentation for new priority levels, (3) Ensure backward compatibility with existing commands, (4) Add error handling for invalid inputs, (5) Write and run tests for all command scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This CLI feature requires command parsing, updating internal logic for new priority levels, documentation, and robust error handling. The complexity is moderate due to the need for backward compatibility and comprehensive testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 90,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Subtask Progress Analyzer and Reporting System",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the analyzer implementation into: (1) Design and implement progress tracking logic, (2) Develop status validation and issue detection, (3) Build the reporting system with multiple output formats, (4) Integrate analyzer with the existing task management system, (5) Optimize for performance and scalability, (6) Write unit, integration, and performance tests.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This is a complex, multi-faceted feature involving data analysis, reporting, integration, and performance optimization. It touches many parts of the system and requires careful design, making it one of the most complex tasks in the list."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 91,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Move Command for Tasks and Subtasks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand this task into: (1) Implement move logic for tasks and subtasks, (2) Handle edge cases (invalid ids, non-existent parents, circular dependencies), (3) Update CLI to support move command with flags, (4) Ensure data integrity and update relationships, (5) Write and execute tests for various move scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moving tasks and subtasks requires careful handling of hierarchical data, edge cases, and data integrity. The command must be robust and user-friendly, necessitating multiple focused subtasks for safe implementation."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2025-05-27T16:34:53.088Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 1,
|
||||
"totalTasks": 84,
|
||||
"analysisCount": 45,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
||||
"usedResearch": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 24,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement AI-Powered Test Generation Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the implementation of the AI-powered test generation command into detailed subtasks covering: command structure setup, AI prompt engineering, test file generation logic, integration with Claude API, and comprehensive error handling.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves complex integration with an AI service (Claude), requires sophisticated prompt engineering, and needs to generate structured code files. The existing 3 subtasks are a good start but could be expanded to include more detailed steps for AI integration, error handling, and test file formatting."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 26,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Context Foundation for AI Operations",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing the context foundation appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or integration with existing systems.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a foundation for context integration with several well-defined components. The existing 4 subtasks cover the main implementation areas (context-file flag, cursor rules integration, context extraction utility, and command handler updates). The complexity is moderate as it requires careful integration with existing systems but has clear requirements."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 27,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Context Enhancements for AI Operations",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing context enhancements appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task builds upon the foundation from Task #26 and adds more sophisticated context handling features. The 4 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas (code context extraction, task history context, PRD context integration, and context formatting). The complexity is higher than the foundation task due to the need for intelligent context selection and optimization."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 28,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Advanced ContextManager System",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the advanced ContextManager system appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or backward compatibility with previous context implementations.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task represents the most complex phase of the context implementation, requiring a sophisticated class design, optimization algorithms, and integration with multiple systems. The 5 existing subtasks cover the core implementation areas, but the complexity is high due to the need for intelligent context prioritization, token management, and performance monitoring."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 40,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement 'plan' Command for Task Implementation Planning",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for implementing the 'plan' command appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing, documentation, or integration with existing task management workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new command that leverages AI to generate implementation plans. The existing 4 subtasks cover the main implementation areas (retrieving task content, generating plans with AI, formatting in XML, and error handling). The complexity is moderate as it builds on existing patterns for task updates but requires careful AI integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 41,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Visual Task Dependency Graph in Terminal",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 10,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 10 subtasks for implementing the visual task dependency graph appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance optimization with large graphs or additional visualization options.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated visualization system for terminal display, which is inherently complex due to layout algorithms, ASCII/Unicode rendering, and handling complex dependency relationships. The 10 existing subtasks cover all major aspects of implementation, from CLI interface to accessibility features."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 42,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement MCP-to-MCP Communication Protocol",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for implementing the MCP-to-MCP communication protocol appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security hardening, performance optimization, or comprehensive documentation.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves designing and implementing a complex communication protocol between different MCP tools and servers. It requires sophisticated adapter patterns, client-server architecture, and handling of multiple operational modes. The complexity is very high due to the need for standardization, security, and backward compatibility."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 44,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Task Automation with Webhooks and Event Triggers",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for implementing task automation with webhooks appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security testing, rate limiting implementation, or webhook monitoring tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated event system with webhooks for integration with external services. The complexity is high due to the need for secure authentication, reliable delivery mechanisms, and handling of various webhook formats and protocols. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas but security and monitoring could be emphasized more."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 45,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement GitHub Issue Import Feature",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the GitHub issue import feature appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling GitHub API rate limiting, caching, or supporting additional issue metadata.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves integrating with the GitHub API to import issues as tasks. The complexity is moderate as it requires API authentication, data mapping, and error handling. The existing 5 subtasks cover the main implementation areas from design to end-to-end implementation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 46,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement ICE Analysis Command for Task Prioritization",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the ICE analysis command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for visualization of ICE scores or integration with other prioritization methods.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating an AI-powered analysis system for task prioritization using the ICE methodology. The complexity is high due to the need for sophisticated scoring algorithms, AI integration, and report generation. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from algorithm design to integration with existing systems."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 47,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Task Suggestion Actions Card Workflow",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for enhancing the task suggestion actions card workflow appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for user testing, accessibility improvements, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves redesigning the UI workflow for task expansion and management. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful UX design and state management but builds on existing components. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from design to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 48,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Refactor Prompts into Centralized Structure",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 3 subtasks for refactoring prompts into a centralized structure appear appropriate. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for prompt versioning, documentation, or testing.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a straightforward refactoring to improve code organization. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves moving code rather than creating new functionality. The 3 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from directory structure to integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 49,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Code Quality Analysis Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the code quality analysis command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance optimization with large codebases or integration with existing code quality tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated code analysis system with pattern recognition, best practice verification, and AI-powered recommendations. The complexity is high due to the need for code parsing, complex analysis algorithms, and integration with AI services. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from algorithm design to user interface."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 50,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Test Coverage Tracking System by Task",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the test coverage tracking system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for integration with CI/CD systems, performance optimization, or visualization tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a complex system that maps test coverage to specific tasks and subtasks. The complexity is very high due to the need for sophisticated data structures, integration with coverage tools, and AI-powered test generation. The existing subtasks are comprehensive and cover the main implementation areas from data structure design to AI integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 51,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Perplexity Research Command",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the Perplexity research command appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for caching optimization, result formatting, or integration with other research tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new command that integrates with the Perplexity AI API for research. The complexity is moderate as it requires API integration, context extraction, and result formatting. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from API client to caching system."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 52,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Task Suggestion Command for CLI",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing the task suggestion command appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for suggestion quality evaluation, user feedback collection, or integration with existing task workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a new CLI command that generates contextually relevant task suggestions using AI. The complexity is moderate as it requires AI integration, context collection, and interactive CLI interfaces. The existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from data collection to user interface."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 53,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Subtask Suggestion Feature for Parent Tasks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the subtask suggestion feature appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for suggestion quality metrics, user feedback collection, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a feature that suggests contextually relevant subtasks for parent tasks. The complexity is moderate as it builds on existing task management systems but requires sophisticated AI integration and context analysis. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from validation to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 55,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Positional Arguments Support for CLI Commands",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing positional arguments support appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for backward compatibility testing, documentation updates, or user experience improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves modifying the command parsing logic to support positional arguments alongside the existing flag-based syntax. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful handling of different argument styles and edge cases. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from analysis to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 57,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Task-Master CLI User Experience and Interface",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for enhancing the CLI user experience appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for accessibility testing, internationalization, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a significant overhaul of the CLI interface to improve user experience. The complexity is high due to the breadth of changes (logging, visual elements, interactive components, etc.) and the need for consistent design across all commands. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from log management to help systems."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 60,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Mentor System with Round-Table Discussion Feature",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for implementing the mentor system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for mentor personality consistency, discussion quality evaluation, or performance optimization with multiple mentors.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated mentor simulation system with round-table discussions. The complexity is high due to the need for personality simulation, complex LLM integration, and structured discussion management. The 7 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from architecture to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 62,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add --simple Flag to Update Commands for Direct Text Input",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for implementing the --simple flag appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for user experience testing or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves adding a simple flag option to bypass AI processing for updates. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves modifying existing command handlers and adding a flag. The 8 existing subtasks are very detailed and cover all aspects of implementation from command parsing to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 63,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add pnpm Support for the Taskmaster Package",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 8 subtasks for adding pnpm support appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for CI/CD integration, performance comparison, or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves ensuring the package works correctly with pnpm as an alternative package manager. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful testing of installation processes and scripts across different environments. The 8 existing subtasks cover all major aspects from documentation to binary verification."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 64,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add Yarn Support for Taskmaster Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 9,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 9 subtasks for adding Yarn support appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for performance testing, CI/CD integration, or compatibility with different Yarn versions.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves ensuring the package works correctly with Yarn as an alternative package manager. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful testing of installation processes and scripts across different environments. The 9 existing subtasks are very detailed and cover all aspects from configuration to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 65,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add Bun Support for Taskmaster Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for adding Bun support appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling Bun-specific issues, performance testing, or documentation updates.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves adding support for the newer Bun package manager. The complexity is slightly higher than the other package manager tasks due to Bun's differences from Node.js and potential compatibility issues. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from research to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 67,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add CLI JSON output and Cursor keybindings integration",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing JSON output and Cursor keybindings appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing across different operating systems, documentation updates, or user experience improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves two distinct features: adding JSON output to CLI commands and creating a keybindings installation command. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful handling of different output formats and OS-specific file paths. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas for both features."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 68,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Ability to create tasks without parsing PRD",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 2 subtasks for implementing task creation without PRD appear appropriate. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for validation, error handling, or integration with existing task management workflows.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a relatively simple modification to allow task creation without requiring a PRD document. The complexity is low as it primarily involves creating a form interface and saving functionality. The 2 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas of UI design and data saving."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 72,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement PDF Generation for Project Progress and Dependency Overview",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing PDF generation appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for handling large projects, additional visualization options, or integration with existing reporting tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a feature to generate PDF reports of project progress and dependency visualization. The complexity is high due to the need for PDF generation, data collection, and visualization integration. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from library selection to export options."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 75,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Integrate Google Search Grounding for Research Role",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 4 subtasks for integrating Google Search Grounding appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for testing with different query types, error handling, or performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves updating the AI service layer to enable Google Search Grounding for research roles. The complexity is moderate as it requires careful integration with the existing AI service architecture and conditional logic. The 4 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from service layer modification to testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 76,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Develop E2E Test Framework for Taskmaster MCP Server (FastMCP over stdio)",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 7 subtasks for developing the E2E test framework appear comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for test result reporting, CI/CD integration, or performance benchmarking.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a sophisticated end-to-end testing framework for the MCP server. The complexity is high due to the need for subprocess management, protocol handling, and robust test case definition. The 7 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from architecture to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 77,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement AI Usage Telemetry for Taskmaster (with external analytics endpoint)",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 18,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 18 subtasks for implementing AI usage telemetry appear very comprehensive. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for security hardening, privacy compliance, or user feedback collection.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a telemetry system to track AI usage metrics. The complexity is high due to the need for secure data transmission, comprehensive data collection, and integration across multiple commands. The 18 existing subtasks are extremely detailed and cover all aspects of implementation from core utility to provider-specific updates."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 80,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Unique User ID Generation and Storage During Installation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 5 subtasks for implementing unique user ID generation appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for privacy compliance, security auditing, or integration with the telemetry system.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves generating and storing a unique user identifier during installation. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves UUID generation and configuration file management. The 5 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from script structure to documentation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 81,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Task #81: Implement Comprehensive Local Telemetry System with Future Server Integration Capability",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "The current 6 subtasks for implementing the comprehensive local telemetry system appear well-structured. Consider if any additional subtasks are needed for data migration, storage optimization, or visualization tools.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves expanding the telemetry system to capture additional metrics and implement local storage with future server integration capability. The complexity is high due to the breadth of data collection, storage requirements, and privacy considerations. The 6 existing subtasks cover the main implementation areas from data collection to user-facing benefits."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 82,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update supported-models.json with token limit fields",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears straightforward enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on researching accurate token limit values for each model and ensuring backward compatibility.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves a simple update to the supported-models.json file to include new token limit fields. The complexity is low as it primarily involves research and data entry. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 83,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update config-manager.js defaults and getters",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears straightforward enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on updating the DEFAULTS object and related getter functions while maintaining backward compatibility.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves updating the config-manager.js module to replace maxTokens with more specific token limit fields. The complexity is relatively low as it primarily involves modifying existing code rather than creating new functionality. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 84,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement token counting utility",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 1,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "This task appears well-defined enough to be implemented without further subtasks. Focus on implementing accurate token counting for different models and proper fallback mechanisms.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves creating a utility function to count tokens for different AI models. The complexity is moderate as it requires integration with the tiktoken library and handling different tokenization schemes. No subtasks are necessary as the task is well-defined and focused."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 69,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Enhance Analyze Complexity for Specific Task IDs",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the task 'Enhance Analyze Complexity for Specific Task IDs' into 6 subtasks focusing on: 1) Core logic modification to accept ID parameters, 2) Report merging functionality, 3) CLI interface updates, 4) MCP tool integration, 5) Documentation updates, and 6) Comprehensive testing across all components.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves modifying existing functionality across multiple components (core logic, CLI, MCP) with complex logic for filtering tasks and merging reports. The implementation requires careful handling of different parameter combinations and edge cases. The task has interdependent components that need to work together seamlessly, and the report merging functionality adds significant complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 70,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement 'diagram' command for Mermaid diagram generation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the 'diagram' command implementation into 5 subtasks: 1) Command interface and parameter handling, 2) Task data extraction and transformation to Mermaid syntax, 3) Diagram rendering with status color coding, 4) Output formatting and file export functionality, and 5) Error handling and edge case management.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task requires implementing a new feature rather than modifying existing code, which reduces complexity from integration challenges. However, it involves working with visualization logic, dependency mapping, and multiple output formats. The color coding based on status and handling of dependency relationships adds moderate complexity. The task is well-defined but requires careful attention to diagram formatting and error handling."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 85,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Update ai-services-unified.js for dynamic token limits",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the update of ai-services-unified.js for dynamic token limits into subtasks such as: (1) Import and integrate the token counting utility, (2) Refactor _unifiedServiceRunner to calculate and enforce dynamic token limits, (3) Update error handling for token limit violations, (4) Add and verify logging for token usage, (5) Write and execute tests for various prompt and model scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves significant code changes to a core function, integration of a new utility, dynamic logic for multiple models, and robust error handling. It also requires comprehensive testing for edge cases and integration, making it moderately complex and best managed by splitting into focused subtasks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 87,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement validation and error handling",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose this task into: (1) Add validation logic for model and config loading, (2) Implement error handling and fallback mechanisms, (3) Enhance logging and reporting for token usage, (4) Develop helper functions for configuration suggestions and improvements.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task is primarily about adding validation, error handling, and logging. While important for robustness, the logic is straightforward and can be modularized into a few clear subtasks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 89,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Introduce Prioritize Command with Enhanced Priority Levels",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand this task into: (1) Implement the prioritize command with all required flags and shorthands, (2) Update CLI output and help documentation for new priority levels, (3) Ensure backward compatibility with existing commands, (4) Add error handling for invalid inputs, (5) Write and run tests for all command scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This CLI feature requires command parsing, updating internal logic for new priority levels, documentation, and robust error handling. The complexity is moderate due to the need for backward compatibility and comprehensive testing."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 90,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Subtask Progress Analyzer and Reporting System",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the analyzer implementation into: (1) Design and implement progress tracking logic, (2) Develop status validation and issue detection, (3) Build the reporting system with multiple output formats, (4) Integrate analyzer with the existing task management system, (5) Optimize for performance and scalability, (6) Write unit, integration, and performance tests.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This is a complex, multi-faceted feature involving data analysis, reporting, integration, and performance optimization. It touches many parts of the system and requires careful design, making it one of the most complex tasks in the list."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 91,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Move Command for Tasks and Subtasks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand this task into: (1) Implement move logic for tasks and subtasks, (2) Handle edge cases (invalid ids, non-existent parents, circular dependencies), (3) Update CLI to support move command with flags, (4) Ensure data integrity and update relationships, (5) Write and execute tests for various move scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moving tasks and subtasks requires careful handling of hierarchical data, edge cases, and data integrity. The command must be robust and user-friendly, necessitating multiple focused subtasks for safe implementation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 92,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add Global Joke Flag to All CLI Commands",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the implementation of the global --joke flag into the following subtasks: (1) Update CLI foundation to support global flags, (2) Develop the joke-service module with joke management and category support, (3) Integrate joke output into existing output utilities, (4) Update all CLI commands for joke flag compatibility, (5) Add configuration options for joke categories and custom jokes, (6) Implement comprehensive testing (flag recognition, output, content, integration, performance, regression), (7) Update documentation and usage examples.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task requires changes across the CLI foundation, output utilities, all command modules, and configuration management. It introduces a new service module, global flag handling, and output logic that must not interfere with existing features (including JSON output). The need for robust testing and backward compatibility further increases complexity. The scope spans multiple code areas and requires careful integration, justifying a high complexity score and a detailed subtask breakdown to manage risk and ensure maintainability.[2][3][5]"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 94,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Standalone 'research' CLI Command for AI-Powered Queries",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the implementation of the 'research' CLI command into logical subtasks covering command registration, parameter handling, context gathering, AI service integration, output formatting, and documentation.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task has moderate to high complexity (7/10) due to multiple interconnected components: CLI argument parsing, integration with AI services, context gathering from various sources, and output formatting with different modes. The cyclomatic complexity would be significant with multiple decision paths for handling different flags and options. The task requires understanding existing patterns and extending the codebase in a consistent manner, suggesting the need for careful decomposition into manageable subtasks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 86,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement GitHub Issue Export Feature",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 10,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the implementation of the GitHub Issue Export Feature into detailed subtasks covering: command structure and CLI integration, GitHub API client development, authentication and error handling, task-to-issue mapping logic, content formatting and markdown conversion, bidirectional linking and metadata management, extensible architecture and adapter interfaces, configuration and settings management, documentation, and comprehensive testing (unit, integration, edge cases, performance).",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This task involves designing and implementing a robust, extensible export system with deep integration into GitHub, including bidirectional workflows, complex data mapping, error handling, and support for future platforms. The requirements span CLI design, API integration, content transformation, metadata management, extensibility, configuration, and extensive testing. The breadth and depth of these requirements, along with the need for maintainability and future extensibility, place this task at a high complexity level. Breaking it into at least 10 subtasks will ensure each major component and concern is addressed systematically, reducing risk and improving quality."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user