feat: implement tdd workflow (#1309)
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ralph Khreish
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2025-10-07T09:46:06.248Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 23,
|
||||
"totalTasks": 23,
|
||||
"analysisCount": 23,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
||||
"usedResearch": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 31,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create WorkflowOrchestrator service foundation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the WorkflowOrchestrator foundation into its core architectural components: phase management system, event emitter infrastructure, state management interfaces, service integration, and lifecycle control methods. Each subtask should focus on a specific architectural concern with clear interfaces and testable units.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "This is a foundational service requiring state machine implementation, event-driven architecture, and integration with existing services. The complexity is high due to the need for robust phase management, error handling, and service orchestration patterns."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 32,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement GitAdapter for repository operations",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose the GitAdapter implementation into: TypeScript wrapper creation around existing git-utils.js, core git operation methods with comprehensive error handling, branch naming pattern system with token replacement, and confirmation gates for destructive operations. Focus on type safety and existing code integration.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to TypeScript integration over existing JavaScript utilities, branch pattern implementation, and safety mechanisms. The existing git-utils.js provides a solid foundation, reducing complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 33,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create TestRunnerAdapter for framework detection and execution",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down TestRunnerAdapter into framework detection logic, test execution engine with process management, Jest-specific result parsing, Vitest-specific result parsing, unified result interfaces, and final integration. Each framework parser should be separate to handle their unique output formats.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to multiple framework support (Jest, Vitest), child process management, result parsing from different formats, coverage reporting, and timeout handling. Each framework has unique output formats requiring specialized parsers."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 34,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement autopilot CLI command structure",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure the autopilot command into: basic command setup with Commander.js integration, comprehensive flag handling and validation system, preflight check validation with environment validation, and WorkflowOrchestrator integration with dry-run execution planning. Follow existing CLI patterns from the codebase.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity involving CLI structure, flag handling, and integration with WorkflowOrchestrator. The existing CLI patterns and Commander.js usage in the codebase provide good guidance, reducing implementation complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 35,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Integrate surgical test generator with WorkflowOrchestrator",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose the test generation integration into: TaskExecutionService enhancement for test generation mode, TestGenerationService creation using executor framework, prompt composition system for rule integration, and framework-specific test pattern support. Leverage existing executor patterns from the codebase.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to integration with existing services, prompt composition system, and framework-specific test generation. The existing executor framework and TaskExecutionService provide good integration points."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 36,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement subtask TDD loop execution",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the TDD loop into: SubtaskExecutor class architecture, RED phase test generation, GREEN phase code generation, COMMIT phase with conventional commits, retry mechanism for GREEN phase, timeout and backoff policies, and TaskService integration. Each phase should be independently testable.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Very high complexity due to implementing the complete TDD red-green-commit cycle with AI integration, retry logic, timeout handling, and git operations. This is the core autonomous workflow requiring robust error handling and state management."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 37,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add configuration schema for autopilot settings",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand configuration support into: extending configuration interfaces with autopilot settings, updating ConfigManager validation logic, and implementing default configuration values. Build on existing configuration patterns and maintain backward compatibility.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low-moderate complexity involving schema extension and validation logic. The existing configuration system provides clear patterns to follow, making this primarily an extension task rather than new architecture."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 38,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement run state persistence and logging",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure run state management into: RunStateManager service class creation, run directory structure and manifest creation, JSONL event logging system, test result and commit tracking storage, and state checkpointing with resume functionality. Focus on data integrity and structured logging.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to file system operations, structured logging, state serialization, and resume functionality. Requires careful design of data formats and error handling for persistence operations."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 39,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add GitHub PR creation with run reports",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose PR creation into: PRAdapter service foundation with interfaces, GitHub CLI integration and command execution, PR body generation from run data and test results, and custom PR template system with configuration support. Leverage existing git-utils.js patterns for CLI integration.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity involving GitHub CLI integration, report generation, and template systems. The existing git-utils.js provides patterns for CLI tool integration, reducing implementation complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 40,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement task dependency resolution for subtask ordering",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down dependency resolution into: dependency resolution algorithm with cycle detection, topological sorting for subtask ordering, task eligibility checking system, and TaskService integration. Implement graph algorithms for dependency management with proper error handling.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to graph algorithm implementation, cycle detection, and integration with existing task management. Requires careful design of dependency resolution logic and edge case handling."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 41,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create resume functionality for interrupted runs",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure resume functionality into: checkpoint creation in RunStateManager, state restoration logic with validation, state validation for safe resume operations, CLI flag implementation for resume command, and partial phase resume functionality. Focus on data integrity and workflow consistency.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to state serialization/deserialization, workflow restoration, validation logic, and CLI integration. Requires robust error handling and state consistency checks for reliable resume operations."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 42,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add coverage threshold enforcement",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose coverage enforcement into: coverage report parsing from Jest/Vitest, configurable threshold validation logic, coverage gates integration in workflow phases, and detailed coverage failure reporting system. Build on existing TestRunnerAdapter patterns.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity involving coverage report parsing, validation logic, and workflow integration. The existing TestRunnerAdapter provides good foundation for extending coverage capabilities."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 43,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement tmux-based TUI navigator",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down TUI implementation into: framework selection and basic structure setup, left pane interface layout with status indicators, tmux integration and terminal coordination, navigation system with keybindings, real-time status updates system, and comprehensive event handling with UX polish. Each component should be independently testable.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to terminal UI framework integration, tmux session management, real-time updates, keyboard event handling, and terminal interface design. Requires expertise in terminal UI libraries and tmux integration."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 44,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add prompt composition system for context-aware test generation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure prompt composition into: PromptComposer service foundation, template processing engine with token replacement, rule loading system with precedence handling, and context injection with phase-specific prompt generation. Focus on flexible template system and rule management.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to template processing, rule precedence systems, and context injection logic. Requires careful design of template syntax and rule loading mechanisms."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 45,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement tag-branch mapping and automatic tag switching",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose tag-branch mapping into: GitAdapter enhancement with branch-to-tag extraction logic, automatic tag switching workflow integration, and branch-to-tag mapping persistence with validation. Build on existing git-utils.js and tag management functionality.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity involving pattern matching, tag management integration, and workflow automation. The existing git-utils.js and tag management systems provide good foundation for implementation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 46,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add comprehensive error handling and recovery",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure error handling into: error classification system with specific error types, recovery suggestion engine with actionable recommendations, error context management and preservation, force flag implementation with selective bypass, and logging/reporting system integration. Focus on actionable error messages and automated recovery where possible.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to comprehensive error taxonomy, recovery automation, context preservation, and integration across all workflow components. Requires deep understanding of failure modes and recovery strategies."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 47,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement conventional commit message generation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down commit message generation into: template system creation with variable substitution, commit type auto-detection based on task content and file changes, and validation with GitAdapter integration. Follow conventional commit standards and integrate with existing git operations.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low-moderate complexity involving template processing, pattern matching for commit type detection, and validation logic. Well-defined conventional commit standards provide clear implementation guidance."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 48,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add multi-framework test execution support",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Expand test framework support into: framework detection system for multiple languages, common adapter interface design, Python pytest adapter implementation, Go and Rust adapter implementations, and integration with existing TestRunnerAdapter. Each language adapter should follow the unified interface pattern.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to multi-language support, framework detection across different ecosystems, and adapter pattern implementation. Each language has unique testing conventions and output formats."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 49,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement workflow event streaming for real-time monitoring",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure event streaming into: WorkflowOrchestrator EventEmitter enhancement, structured event format with metadata, event persistence to run logs, and optional WebSocket streaming for external monitoring. Focus on event consistency and real-time delivery.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to event-driven architecture, structured event formats, persistence integration, and WebSocket implementation. Requires careful design of event schemas and delivery mechanisms."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 50,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add intelligent test targeting for faster feedback",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose test targeting into: file change detection system, test dependency analysis engine, framework-specific targeting adapters, test impact calculation algorithm, and fallback integration with TestRunnerAdapter. Focus on accuracy and performance optimization.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to dependency analysis, impact calculation algorithms, framework-specific targeting, and integration with existing test execution. Requires sophisticated analysis of code relationships and test dependencies."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 51,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement dry-run visualization with execution timeline",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure dry-run visualization into: timeline calculation engine with duration estimates, estimation algorithms based on task complexity, ASCII art progress visualization with formatting, and resource validation with preflight checks. Focus on accurate planning and clear visual presentation.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to timeline calculation, estimation algorithms, ASCII visualization, and resource validation. Requires understanding of workflow timing and visual formatting for terminal output."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 52,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add autopilot workflow integration tests",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure integration testing into: isolated test environment infrastructure, mock integrations and service stubs, end-to-end workflow test scenarios, performance benchmarking and resource monitoring, test isolation and parallelization strategies, and comprehensive result validation and reporting. Focus on realistic test scenarios and reliable automation.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to end-to-end testing requirements, mock service integration, performance testing, isolation mechanisms, and comprehensive validation. Requires sophisticated test infrastructure and scenario design."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 53,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Finalize autopilot documentation and examples",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure documentation into: comprehensive autopilot documentation covering setup and usage, example PRD files and templates for different project types, troubleshooting guide for common issues and solutions, and demo materials with workflow visualization. Focus on clarity and practical examples.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low complexity involving documentation writing, example creation, and demo material production. The main challenge is ensuring accuracy and completeness rather than technical implementation."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2025-10-09T12:47:27.960Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 10,
|
||||
"totalTasks": 10,
|
||||
"analysisCount": 10,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
||||
"usedResearch": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 1,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Design and Implement Global Storage System",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the global storage system implementation into: 1) Path normalization utilities with cross-platform support, 2) Run ID generation and validation, 3) Manifest.json structure and management, 4) Activity.jsonl append-only logging, 5) State.json mutable checkpoint handling, and 6) Directory structure creation and cleanup. Focus on robust error handling, atomic operations, and isolation between different runs.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Complex system requiring cross-platform path handling, multiple file formats (JSON/JSONL), atomic operations, and state management. The existing codebase shows sophisticated file operations infrastructure but this extends beyond current patterns. Implementation involves filesystem operations, concurrency concerns, and data integrity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 2,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Build GitAdapter with Safety Checks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 7,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Decompose GitAdapter into: 1) Git repository detection and validation, 2) Working tree status checking with detailed reporting, 3) Branch operations (create, checkout, list) with safety guards, 4) Commit operations with metadata embedding, 5) Default branch detection and protection logic, 6) Push operations with conflict handling, and 7) Branch name generation from patterns. Emphasize safety checks, confirmation gates, and comprehensive error messages.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to git operations safety requirements, multiple git commands integration, error handling for various git states, and safety mechanisms. The PRD emphasizes never allowing commits on default branch and requiring clean working tree - critical safety features that need robust implementation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 3,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Test Result Validator",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Split test validation into: 1) Input validation and schema definition for test results, 2) RED phase validation logic (ensuring failures exist), 3) GREEN phase validation logic (ensuring all tests pass), and 4) Coverage threshold validation with configurable limits. Include comprehensive validation messages and suggestions for common failure scenarios.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity focused on business logic validation. The validator is framework-agnostic (only validates reported numbers), has clear validation rules, and well-defined input/output. The existing codebase shows validation patterns that can be leveraged."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 4,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Develop WorkflowOrchestrator State Machine",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 9,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 8,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure the orchestrator into: 1) State machine definition and transitions (Preflight → BranchSetup → SubtaskLoop → Finalize), 2) Event emission system with comprehensive event types, 3) State persistence and recovery mechanisms, 4) Phase coordination and validation, 5) Subtask iteration and progress tracking, 6) Error handling and recovery strategies, 7) Resume functionality from checkpoints, and 8) Integration points for Git, Test, and other adapters.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Very high complexity as the central coordination component. Must orchestrate multiple adapters, handle state transitions, event emission, persistence, and recovery. The state machine needs to be robust, resumable, and coordinate all other components. Critical for the entire workflow's reliability."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 5,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create Enhanced Commit Message Generator",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Organize commit message generation into: 1) Template parsing and variable substitution with configurable templates, 2) Scope detection from changed files with intelligent categorization, and 3) Metadata embedding (task context, test results, coverage) with conventional commits compliance. Ensure messages are parseable and contain all required task metadata.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Relatively straightforward text processing and template system. The conventional commits format is well-defined, and the metadata requirements are clear. The existing package.json shows commander dependency for CLI patterns that can be leveraged."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 6,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Subtask TDD Loop",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 6,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the TDD loop into: 1) RED phase orchestration with test generation coordination, 2) GREEN phase orchestration with implementation guidance, 3) COMMIT phase with file staging and commit creation, 4) Attempt tracking and maximum retry logic, 5) Phase transition validation and state updates, and 6) Activity logging for all phase transitions. Focus on robust state management and clear error recovery paths.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to coordinating multiple phases, state transitions, retry logic, and integration with multiple adapters (Git, Test, State). This is the core workflow execution engine requiring careful orchestration and error handling."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 7,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Build CLI Commands for AI Agent Orchestration",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure CLI commands into: 1) Command registration and argument parsing setup, 2) `start` and `resume` commands with initialization logic, 3) `next` and `status` commands with JSON output formatting, 4) `complete` command with result validation integration, and 5) `commit` and `abort` commands with git operation coordination. Ensure consistent JSON output for machine parsing and comprehensive error handling.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity leveraging existing CLI infrastructure. The codebase shows commander usage patterns and CLI structure. Main complexity is in JSON output formatting, argument validation, and integration with the orchestrator component."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 8,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Develop MCP Tools for AI Agent Integration",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Organize MCP tools into: 1) Tool schema definition and parameter validation, 2) `autopilot_start` and `autopilot_resume` tool implementation, 3) `autopilot_next` and `autopilot_status` tools with context provision, 4) `autopilot_complete_phase` tool with validation integration, and 5) `autopilot_commit` tool with git operations. Ensure parity with CLI functionality and proper error handling.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity building on existing MCP infrastructure. The codebase shows extensive MCP tooling patterns. Main work is adapting CLI functionality to MCP interface patterns and ensuring consistent behavior between CLI and MCP interfaces."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 9,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Write AI Agent Integration Documentation and Templates",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 2,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure documentation into: 1) Comprehensive workflow documentation with step-by-step examples, command usage, and integration patterns, and 2) Template creation for CLAUDE.md integration, example prompts, and troubleshooting guides. Focus on clear examples and practical integration guidance.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low complexity documentation task. Requires understanding of the implemented system but primarily involves writing clear instructions and examples. The existing codebase shows good documentation patterns that can be followed."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 10,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement Configuration System and Project Hygiene",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Structure configuration into: 1) Configuration schema definition with comprehensive validation using ajv, 2) Default configuration setup and loading mechanisms, 3) Gitignore management and project directory hygiene rules, and 4) Configuration validation and error reporting. Ensure configurations are validated on startup and provide clear error messages for invalid settings.",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate complexity involving schema validation, file operations, and configuration management. The package.json shows ajv dependency is available. Configuration systems require careful validation and user-friendly error reporting, but follow established patterns."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"generatedAt": "2025-10-07T14:16:40.283Z",
|
||||
"tasksAnalyzed": 10,
|
||||
"totalTasks": 10,
|
||||
"analysisCount": 10,
|
||||
"thresholdScore": 5,
|
||||
"projectName": "Taskmaster",
|
||||
"usedResearch": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexityAnalysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 1,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create autopilot command CLI skeleton",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Break down the autopilot command creation into: 1) Create AutopilotCommand class extending Commander.Command with proper argument parsing and options, 2) Implement command structure with help text and validation following existing patterns, 3) Add basic registration method and placeholder action handler",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Medium complexity due to following established patterns in the codebase. The command-registry.ts and start.command.ts provide clear templates for implementation. Main complexity is argument parsing and option validation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 2,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement preflight detection system",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Create PreflightChecker with these subtasks: 1) Package.json test script detection and validation, 2) Git working tree status checking using system commands, 3) Tool availability validation (git, gh, node/npm), 4) Default branch detection via git commands, 5) Structured result reporting with success/failure indicators and error messages",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to system integration requirements. Needs to interact with multiple external tools (git, npm, gh), parse various file formats, and handle different system configurations. Error handling for missing tools adds complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 3,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement task loading and validation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 5,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Implement task loading: 1) Use existing TaskService from @tm/core to load tasks by ID with proper error handling, 2) Validate task structure including subtask existence and dependency validation, 3) Provide user-friendly error messages for missing tasks or need to expand subtasks first",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Medium-high complexity. While leveraging existing TaskService reduces implementation effort, the validation logic for subtasks and dependencies requires careful handling of edge cases. Task structure validation adds complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 4,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create execution plan display logic",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Build ExecutionPlanDisplay: 1) Create display formatter using boxen and chalk for consistent CLI styling, 2) Format preflight check results with color-coded status indicators, 3) Display subtask execution order with RED/GREEN/COMMIT phase visualization, 4) Show branch/tag info and finalization steps with duration estimates",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to complex formatting requirements and dependency on multiple other components. The display needs to coordinate information from preflight, task validation, and execution planning. CLI styling consistency adds complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 5,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement branch and tag planning",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Create BranchPlanner: 1) Implement branch name generation using pattern <tag>/task-<id>-<slug> with kebab-case conversion and special character handling, 2) Add TaskMaster config integration to determine active tag and handle existing branch conflicts",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low-medium complexity. String manipulation and naming convention implementation is straightforward. The main complexity is handling edge cases with special characters and existing branch conflicts."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 6,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Create subtask execution order calculation",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 8,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Implement dependency resolution: 1) Build dependency graph from subtask data with proper parsing, 2) Implement topological sort algorithm for execution order, 3) Add circular dependency detection with clear error reporting, 4) Create parallel execution grouping for independent subtasks",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to graph algorithms and dependency resolution. Topological sorting, circular dependency detection, and parallel grouping require algorithmic sophistication. Edge cases in dependency chains add significant complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 7,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Implement TDD phase planning for subtasks",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 6,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 4,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Create TDDPhasePlanner: 1) Implement test file path detection for common project structures (src/, tests/, __tests__), 2) Parse implementation files from subtask details and descriptions, 3) Generate conventional commit messages for RED/GREEN/COMMIT phases, 4) Add implementation complexity estimation based on subtask content",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Moderate-high complexity due to project structure detection and file path inference. Conventional commit message generation and complexity estimation require understanding of different project layouts and parsing subtask content effectively."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 8,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add finalization steps planning",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 4,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 3,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Create FinalizationPlanner: 1) Implement test suite execution planning with coverage threshold detection from package.json, 2) Add git operations planning (branch push, PR creation) using existing git patterns, 3) Create duration estimation algorithm based on subtask count and complexity metrics",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Medium complexity. Building on existing git utilities and test command detection reduces complexity. Main challenges are coverage threshold parsing and duration estimation algorithms."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 9,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Integrate command with existing CLI infrastructure",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 3,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 2,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Complete CLI integration: 1) Add AutopilotCommand to command-registry.ts following existing patterns and update command metadata, 2) Test command registration and help system integration with proper cleanup and error handling",
|
||||
"reasoning": "Low-medium complexity. The command-registry.ts provides a clear pattern to follow. Main work is registration and ensuring proper integration with existing CLI infrastructure. Well-established patterns reduce complexity."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"taskId": 10,
|
||||
"taskTitle": "Add comprehensive error handling and edge cases",
|
||||
"complexityScore": 7,
|
||||
"recommendedSubtasks": 5,
|
||||
"expansionPrompt": "Implement error handling: 1) Add missing task and invalid task structure error handling with helpful messages, 2) Handle git state errors (dirty working tree, missing tools), 3) Add dependency validation errors (circular, invalid references), 4) Implement missing tool detection with installation guidance, 5) Create user-friendly error messages following existing CLI patterns",
|
||||
"reasoning": "High complexity due to comprehensive error scenarios. Each component (preflight, task loading, dependency resolution) has multiple failure modes that need proper handling. Providing helpful error messages and recovery suggestions adds complexity."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user