feat: implement tdd workflow (#1309)

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ralph Khreish
2025-10-18 16:29:03 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent b8830d9508
commit ccb87a516a
106 changed files with 25097 additions and 1541 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,912 @@
## Summary
- Put the existing git and test workflows on rails: a repeatable, automated process that can run autonomously, with guardrails and a compact TUI for visibility.
- Flow: for a selected task, create a branch named with the tag + task id → generate tests for the first subtask (red) using the Surgical Test Generator → implement code (green) → verify tests → commit → repeat per subtask → final verify → push → open PR against the default branch.
- Build on existing rules: .cursor/rules/git_workflow.mdc, .cursor/rules/test_workflow.mdc, .claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md, and existing CLI/core services.
## Goals
- Deterministic, resumable automation to execute the TDD loop per subtask with minimal human intervention.
- Strong guardrails: never commit to the default branch; only commit when tests pass; enforce status transitions; persist logs/state for debuggability.
- Visibility: a compact terminal UI (like lazygit) to pick tag, view tasks, and start work; right-side pane opens an executor terminal (via tmux) for agent coding.
- Extensible: framework-agnostic test generation via the Surgical Test Generator; detect and use the repos test command for execution with coverage thresholds.
## NonGoals (initial)
- Full multi-language runner parity beyond detection and executing the projects test command.
- Complex GUI; start with CLI/TUI + tmux pane. IDE/extension can hook into the same state later.
- Rich executor selection UX (codex/gemini/claude) — well prompt per run; defaults can come later.
## Success Criteria
- One command can autonomously complete a task's subtasks via TDD and open a PR when done.
- All commits made on a branch that includes the tag and task id (see Branch Naming); no commits to the default branch directly.
- Every subtask iteration: failing tests added first (red), then code added to pass them (green), commit only after green.
- End-to-end logs + artifacts stored in .taskmaster/reports/runs/<timestamp-or-id>/.
## Success Metrics (Phase 1)
- **Adoption**: 80% of tasks in a pilot repo completed via `tm autopilot`
- **Safety**: 0 commits to default branch; 100% of commits have green tests
- **Efficiency**: Average time from task start to PR < 30min for simple subtasks
- **Reliability**: < 5% of runs require manual intervention (timeout/conflicts)
## User Stories
- As a developer, I can run tm autopilot <taskId> and watch a structured, safe workflow execute.
- As a reviewer, I can inspect commits per subtask, and a PR summarizing the work when the task completes.
- As an operator, I can see current step, active subtask, tests status, and logs in a compact CLI view and read a final run report.
## Example Workflow Traces
### Happy Path: Complete a 3-subtask feature
```bash
# Developer starts
$ tm autopilot 42
→ Checks preflight: ✓ clean tree, ✓ npm test detected
→ Creates branch: analytics/task-42-user-metrics
→ Subtask 42.1: "Add metrics schema"
RED: generates test_metrics_schema.test.js → 3 failures
GREEN: implements schema.js → all pass
COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add metrics schema (task 42.1)"
→ Subtask 42.2: "Add collection endpoint"
RED: generates test_metrics_endpoint.test.js → 5 failures
GREEN: implements api/metrics.js → all pass
COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add collection endpoint (task 42.2)"
→ Subtask 42.3: "Add dashboard widget"
RED: generates test_metrics_widget.test.js → 4 failures
GREEN: implements components/MetricsWidget.jsx → all pass
COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add dashboard widget (task 42.3)"
→ Final: all 3 subtasks complete
✓ Run full test suite → all pass
✓ Coverage check → 85% (meets 80% threshold)
PUSH: confirms with user → pushed to origin
PR: opens #123 "Task #42 [analytics]: User metrics tracking"
✓ Task 42 complete. PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123
Run report: .taskmaster/reports/runs/2025-01-15-142033/
```
### Error Recovery: Failing tests timeout
```bash
$ tm autopilot 42
→ Subtask 42.2 GREEN phase: attempt 1 fails (2 tests still red)
→ Subtask 42.2 GREEN phase: attempt 2 fails (1 test still red)
→ Subtask 42.2 GREEN phase: attempt 3 fails (1 test still red)
⚠️ Paused: Could not achieve green state after 3 attempts
📋 State saved to: .taskmaster/reports/runs/2025-01-15-142033/
Last error: "POST /api/metrics returns 500 instead of 201"
Next steps:
- Review diff: git diff HEAD
- Inspect logs: cat .taskmaster/reports/runs/2025-01-15-142033/log.jsonl
- Check test output: cat .taskmaster/reports/runs/2025-01-15-142033/test-results/subtask-42.2-green-attempt3.json
- Resume after manual fix: tm autopilot --resume
# Developer manually fixes the issue, then:
$ tm autopilot --resume
→ Resuming subtask 42.2 GREEN phase
GREEN: all tests pass
COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add collection endpoint (task 42.2)"
→ Continuing to subtask 42.3...
```
### Dry Run: Preview before execution
```bash
$ tm autopilot 42 --dry-run
Autopilot Plan for Task #42 [analytics]: User metrics tracking
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Preflight:
✓ Working tree is clean
✓ Test command detected: npm test
✓ Tools available: git, gh, node, npm
✓ Current branch: main (will create new branch)
Branch & Tag:
→ Create branch: analytics/task-42-user-metrics
→ Set active tag: analytics
Subtasks (3 pending):
1. 42.1: Add metrics schema
- RED: generate tests in src/__tests__/schema.test.js
- GREEN: implement src/schema.js
- COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add metrics schema (task 42.1)"
2. 42.2: Add collection endpoint [depends on 42.1]
- RED: generate tests in src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
- GREEN: implement src/api/metrics.js
- COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add collection endpoint (task 42.2)"
3. 42.3: Add dashboard widget [depends on 42.2]
- RED: generate tests in src/components/__tests__/MetricsWidget.test.jsx
- GREEN: implement src/components/MetricsWidget.jsx
- COMMIT: "feat(metrics): add dashboard widget (task 42.3)"
Finalization:
→ Run full test suite with coverage
→ Push branch to origin (will confirm)
→ Create PR targeting main
Run without --dry-run to execute.
```
## HighLevel Workflow
1) Preflight
- Verify clean working tree or confirm staging/commit policy (configurable).
- Detect repo type and the projects test command (e.g., npm test, pnpm test, pytest, go test).
- Validate tools: git, gh (optional for PR), node/npm, and (if used) claude CLI.
- Load TaskMaster state and selected task; if no subtasks exist, automatically run “expand” before working.
2) Branch & Tag Setup
- Checkout default branch and update (optional), then create a branch using Branch Naming (below).
- Map branch ↔ tag via existing tag management; explicitly set active tag to the branchs tag.
3) Subtask Loop (for each pending/in-progress subtask in dependency order)
- Select next eligible subtask using tm-core TaskService getNextTask() and subtask eligibility logic.
- Red: generate or update failing tests for the subtask
- Use the Surgical Test Generator system prompt .claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md) to produce high-signal tests following project conventions.
- Run tests to confirm red; record results. If not red (already passing), skip to next subtask or escalate.
- Green: implement code to pass tests
- Use executor to implement changes (initial: claude CLI prompt with focused context).
- Re-run tests until green or timeout/backoff policy triggers.
- Commit: when green
- Commit tests + code with conventional commit message. Optionally update subtask status to done.
- Persist run step metadata/logs.
4) Finalization
- Run full test suite and coverage (if configured); optionally lint/format.
- Commit any final adjustments.
- Push branch (ask user to confirm); create PR (via gh pr create) targeting the default branch. Title format: Task #<id> [<tag>]: <title>.
5) PostRun
- Update task status if desired (e.g., review).
- Persist run report (JSON + markdown summary) to .taskmaster/reports/runs/<run-id>/.
## Guardrails
- Never commit to the default branch.
- Commit only if all tests (targeted and suite) pass; allow override flags.
- Enforce 80% coverage thresholds (lines/branches/functions/statements) by default; configurable.
- Timebox/model ops and retries; if not green within N attempts, pause with actionable state for resume.
- Always log actions, commands, and outcomes; include dry-run mode.
- Ask before branch creation, pushing, and opening a PR unless --no-confirm is set.
## Integration Points (Current Repo)
- CLI: apps/cli provides command structure and UI components.
- New command: tm autopilot (alias: task-master autopilot).
- Reuse UI components under apps/cli/src/ui/components/ for headers/task details/next-task.
- Core services: packages/tm-core
- TaskService for selection, status, tags.
- TaskExecutionService for prompt formatting and executor prep.
- Executors: claude executor and ExecutorFactory to run external tools.
- Proposed new: WorkflowOrchestrator to drive the autonomous loop and emit progress events.
- Tag/Git utilities: scripts/modules/utils/git-utils.js and scripts/modules/task-manager/tag-management.js for branch→tag mapping and explicit tag switching.
- Rules: .cursor/rules/git_workflow.mdc and .cursor/rules/test_workflow.mdc to steer behavior and ensure consistency.
- Test generation prompt: .claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md.
## Proposed Components
- Orchestrator (tm-core): WorkflowOrchestrator (new)
- State machine driving phases: Preflight → Branch/Tag → SubtaskIter (Red/Green/Commit) → Finalize → PR.
- Exposes an evented API (progress events) that the CLI can render.
- Stores run state artifacts.
- Test Runner Adapter
- Detects and runs tests via the projects test command (e.g., npm test), with targeted runs where feasible.
- API: runTargeted(files/pattern), runAll(), report summary (failures, duration, coverage), enforce 80% threshold by default.
- Git/PR Adapter
- Encapsulates git ops: branch create/checkout, add/commit, push.
- Optional gh integration to open PR; fallback to instructions if gh unavailable.
- Confirmation gates for branch creation and pushes.
- Prompt/Exec Adapter
- Uses existing executor service to call the selected coding assistant (initially claude) with tight prompts: task/subtask context, surgical tests first, then minimal code to green.
- Run State + Reporting
- JSONL log of steps, timestamps, commands, test results.
- Markdown summary for PR description and post-run artifact.
## CLI UX (MVP)
- Command: tm autopilot [taskId]
- Flags: --dry-run, --no-push, --no-pr, --no-confirm, --force, --max-attempts <n>, --runner <auto|custom>, --commit-scope <scope>
- Output: compact header (project, tag, branch), current phase, subtask line, last test summary, next actions.
- Resume: If interrupted, tm autopilot --resume picks up from last checkpoint in run state.
### TUI with tmux (Linear Execution)
- Left pane: Tag selector, task list (status/priority), start/expand shortcuts; "Start" triggers the next task or a selected task.
- Right pane: Executor terminal (tmux split) that runs the coding agent (claude-code/codex). Autopilot can hand over to the right pane during green.
- MCP integration: use MCP tools for task queries/updates and for shell/test invocations where available.
## TUI Layout (tmux-based)
### Pane Structure
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Task Navigator (left) │ Executor Terminal (right) │
│ │ │
│ Project: my-app │ $ tm autopilot --executor-mode │
│ Branch: analytics/task-42 │ > Running subtask 42.2 GREEN... │
│ Tag: analytics │ > Implementing endpoint... │
│ │ > Tests: 3 passed, 0 failed │
│ Tasks: │ > Ready to commit │
│ → 42 [in-progress] User metrics │ │
│ → 42.1 [done] Schema │ [Live output from Claude Code] │
│ → 42.2 [active] Endpoint ◀ │ │
│ → 42.3 [pending] Dashboard │ │
│ │ │
│ [s] start [p] pause [q] quit │ │
└─────────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Implementation Notes
- **Left pane**: `apps/cli/src/ui/tui/navigator.ts` (new, uses `blessed` or `ink`)
- **Right pane**: spawned via `tmux split-window -h` running `tm autopilot --executor-mode`
- **Communication**: shared state file `.taskmaster/state/current-run.json` + file watching or event stream
- **Keybindings**:
- `s` - Start selected task
- `p` - Pause/resume current run
- `q` - Quit (with confirmation if run active)
- `↑/↓` - Navigate task list
- `Enter` - Expand/collapse subtasks
## Prompt Composition (Detailed)
### System Prompt Assembly
Prompts are composed in three layers:
1. **Base rules** (loaded in order from `.cursor/rules/` and `.claude/agents/`):
- `git_workflow.mdc` → git commit conventions, branch policy, PR guidelines
- `test_workflow.mdc` → TDD loop requirements, coverage thresholds, test structure
- `surgical-test-generator.md` → test generation methodology, project-specific test patterns
2. **Task context injection**:
```
You are implementing:
Task #42 [analytics]: User metrics tracking
Subtask 42.2: Add collection endpoint
Description:
Implement POST /api/metrics endpoint to collect user metrics events
Acceptance criteria:
- POST /api/metrics accepts { userId, eventType, timestamp }
- Validates input schema (reject missing/invalid fields)
- Persists to database
- Returns 201 on success with created record
- Returns 400 on validation errors
Dependencies:
- Subtask 42.1 (metrics schema) is complete
Current phase: RED (generate failing tests)
Test command: npm test
Test file convention: src/**/*.test.js (vitest framework detected)
Branch: analytics/task-42-user-metrics
Project language: JavaScript (Node.js)
```
3. **Phase-specific instructions**:
- **RED phase**: "Generate minimal failing tests for this subtask. Do NOT implement any production code. Only create test files. Confirm tests fail with clear error messages indicating missing implementation."
- **GREEN phase**: "Implement minimal code to pass the failing tests. Follow existing project patterns in `src/`. Only modify files necessary for this subtask. Keep changes focused and reviewable."
### Example Full Prompt (RED Phase)
```markdown
<SYSTEM PROMPT>
[Contents of .cursor/rules/git_workflow.mdc]
[Contents of .cursor/rules/test_workflow.mdc]
[Contents of .claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md]
<TASK CONTEXT>
You are implementing:
Task #42.2: Add collection endpoint
Description:
Implement POST /api/metrics endpoint to collect user metrics events
Acceptance criteria:
- POST /api/metrics accepts { userId, eventType, timestamp }
- Validates input schema (reject missing/invalid fields)
- Persists to database using MetricsSchema from subtask 42.1
- Returns 201 on success with created record
- Returns 400 on validation errors with details
Dependencies: Subtask 42.1 (metrics schema) is complete
<INSTRUCTION>
Generate failing tests for this subtask. Follow project conventions:
- Test file: src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
- Framework: vitest (detected from package.json)
- Test cases to cover:
* POST /api/metrics with valid payload → should return 201 (will fail: endpoint not implemented)
* POST /api/metrics with missing userId → should return 400 (will fail: validation not implemented)
* POST /api/metrics with invalid timestamp → should return 400 (will fail: validation not implemented)
* POST /api/metrics should persist to database → should save record (will fail: persistence not implemented)
Do NOT implement the endpoint code yet. Only create test file(s).
Confirm tests fail with messages like "Cannot POST /api/metrics" or "endpoint not defined".
Output format:
1. File path to create: src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
2. Complete test code
3. Command to run: npm test src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
```
### Example Full Prompt (GREEN Phase)
```markdown
<SYSTEM PROMPT>
[Contents of .cursor/rules/git_workflow.mdc]
[Contents of .cursor/rules/test_workflow.mdc]
<TASK CONTEXT>
Task #42.2: Add collection endpoint
[same context as RED phase]
<CURRENT STATE>
Tests created in RED phase:
- src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
- 5 tests written, all failing as expected
Test output:
```
FAIL src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
POST /api/metrics
✗ should return 201 with valid payload (endpoint not found)
✗ should return 400 with missing userId (endpoint not found)
✗ should return 400 with invalid timestamp (endpoint not found)
✗ should persist to database (endpoint not found)
```
<INSTRUCTION>
Implement minimal code to make all tests pass.
Guidelines:
- Create/modify file: src/api/metrics.js
- Use existing patterns from src/api/ (e.g., src/api/users.js for reference)
- Import MetricsSchema from subtask 42.1 (src/models/schema.js)
- Implement validation, persistence, and response handling
- Follow project error handling conventions
- Keep implementation focused on this subtask only
After implementation:
1. Run tests: npm test src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js
2. Confirm all 5 tests pass
3. Report results
Output format:
1. File(s) created/modified
2. Implementation code
3. Test command and results
```
### Prompt Loading Configuration
See `.taskmaster/config.json` → `prompts` section for paths and load order.
## Configuration Schema
### .taskmaster/config.json
```json
{
"autopilot": {
"enabled": true,
"requireCleanWorkingTree": true,
"commitTemplate": "{type}({scope}): {msg}",
"defaultCommitType": "feat",
"maxGreenAttempts": 3,
"testTimeout": 300000
},
"test": {
"runner": "auto",
"coverageThresholds": {
"lines": 80,
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80,
"statements": 80
},
"targetedRunPattern": "**/*.test.js"
},
"git": {
"branchPattern": "{tag}/task-{id}-{slug}",
"pr": {
"enabled": true,
"base": "default",
"bodyTemplate": ".taskmaster/templates/pr-body.md"
}
},
"prompts": {
"rulesPath": ".cursor/rules",
"testGeneratorPath": ".claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md",
"loadOrder": ["git_workflow.mdc", "test_workflow.mdc"]
}
}
```
### Configuration Fields
#### autopilot
- `enabled` (boolean): Enable/disable autopilot functionality
- `requireCleanWorkingTree` (boolean): Require clean git state before starting
- `commitTemplate` (string): Template for commit messages (tokens: `{type}`, `{scope}`, `{msg}`)
- `defaultCommitType` (string): Default commit type (feat, fix, chore, etc.)
- `maxGreenAttempts` (number): Maximum retry attempts to achieve green tests (default: 3)
- `testTimeout` (number): Timeout in milliseconds per test run (default: 300000 = 5min)
#### test
- `runner` (string): Test runner detection mode (`"auto"` or explicit command like `"npm test"`)
- `coverageThresholds` (object): Minimum coverage percentages required
- `lines`, `branches`, `functions`, `statements` (number): Threshold percentages (0-100)
- `targetedRunPattern` (string): Glob pattern for targeted subtask test runs
#### git
- `branchPattern` (string): Branch naming pattern (tokens: `{tag}`, `{id}`, `{slug}`)
- `pr.enabled` (boolean): Enable automatic PR creation
- `pr.base` (string): Target branch for PRs (`"default"` uses repo default, or specify like `"main"`)
- `pr.bodyTemplate` (string): Path to PR body template file (optional)
#### prompts
- `rulesPath` (string): Directory containing rule files (e.g., `.cursor/rules`)
- `testGeneratorPath` (string): Path to test generator prompt file
- `loadOrder` (array): Order to load rule files from `rulesPath`
### Environment Variables
```bash
# Required for executor
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... # Claude API key
# Optional: for PR creation
GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_... # GitHub personal access token
# Optional: for other executors (future)
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-...
GOOGLE_API_KEY=...
```
## Run Artifacts & Observability
### Per-Run Artifact Structure
Each autopilot run creates a timestamped directory with complete traceability:
```
.taskmaster/reports/runs/2025-01-15-142033/
├── manifest.json # run metadata (task id, start/end time, status)
├── log.jsonl # timestamped event stream
├── commits.txt # list of commit SHAs made during run
├── test-results/
│ ├── subtask-42.1-red.json
│ ├── subtask-42.1-green.json
│ ├── subtask-42.2-red.json
│ ├── subtask-42.2-green-attempt1.json
│ ├── subtask-42.2-green-attempt2.json
│ ├── subtask-42.2-green-attempt3.json
│ └── final-suite.json
└── pr.md # generated PR body
```
### manifest.json Format
```json
{
"runId": "2025-01-15-142033",
"taskId": "42",
"tag": "analytics",
"branch": "analytics/task-42-user-metrics",
"startTime": "2025-01-15T14:20:33Z",
"endTime": "2025-01-15T14:45:12Z",
"status": "completed",
"subtasksCompleted": ["42.1", "42.2", "42.3"],
"subtasksFailed": [],
"totalCommits": 3,
"prUrl": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123",
"finalCoverage": {
"lines": 85.3,
"branches": 82.1,
"functions": 88.9,
"statements": 85.0
}
}
```
### log.jsonl Format
Event stream in JSON Lines format for easy parsing and debugging:
```jsonl
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:20:33Z","phase":"preflight","status":"ok","details":{"testCmd":"npm test","gitClean":true}}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:20:45Z","phase":"branch","status":"ok","branch":"analytics/task-42-user-metrics"}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:21:00Z","phase":"red","subtask":"42.1","status":"ok","tests":{"failed":3,"passed":0}}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:22:15Z","phase":"green","subtask":"42.1","status":"ok","tests":{"passed":3,"failed":0},"attempts":2}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:22:20Z","phase":"commit","subtask":"42.1","status":"ok","sha":"a1b2c3d","message":"feat(metrics): add metrics schema (task 42.1)"}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:23:00Z","phase":"red","subtask":"42.2","status":"ok","tests":{"failed":5,"passed":0}}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:25:30Z","phase":"green","subtask":"42.2","status":"error","tests":{"passed":3,"failed":2},"attempts":3,"error":"Max attempts reached"}
{"ts":"2025-01-15T14:25:35Z","phase":"pause","reason":"max_attempts","nextAction":"manual_review"}
```
### Test Results Format
Each test run stores detailed results:
```json
{
"subtask": "42.2",
"phase": "green",
"attempt": 3,
"timestamp": "2025-01-15T14:25:30Z",
"command": "npm test src/api/__tests__/metrics.test.js",
"exitCode": 1,
"duration": 2340,
"summary": {
"total": 5,
"passed": 3,
"failed": 2,
"skipped": 0
},
"failures": [
{
"test": "POST /api/metrics should return 201 with valid payload",
"error": "Expected status 201, got 500",
"stack": "..."
}
],
"coverage": {
"lines": 78.5,
"branches": 75.0,
"functions": 80.0,
"statements": 78.5
}
}
```
## Execution Model
### Orchestration vs Direct Execution
The autopilot system uses an **orchestration model** rather than direct code execution:
**Orchestrator Role** (tm-core WorkflowOrchestrator):
- Maintains state machine tracking current phase (RED/GREEN/COMMIT) per subtask
- Validates preconditions (tests pass, git state clean, etc.)
- Returns "work units" describing what needs to be done next
- Records completion and advances to next phase
- Persists state for resumability
**Executor Role** (Claude Code/AI session via MCP):
- Queries orchestrator for next work unit
- Executes the work (generates tests, writes code, runs tests, makes commits)
- Reports results back to orchestrator
- Handles file operations and tool invocations
**Why This Approach?**
- Leverages existing AI capabilities (Claude Code) rather than duplicating them
- MCP protocol provides clean separation between state management and execution
- Allows human oversight and intervention at each phase
- Simpler to implement: orchestrator is pure state logic, no code generation needed
- Enables multiple executor types (Claude Code, other AI tools, human developers)
**Example Flow**:
```typescript
// Claude Code (via MCP) queries orchestrator
const workUnit = await orchestrator.getNextWorkUnit('42');
// => {
// phase: 'RED',
// subtask: '42.1',
// action: 'Generate failing tests for metrics schema',
// context: { title, description, dependencies, testFile: 'src/__tests__/schema.test.js' }
// }
// Claude Code executes the work (writes test file, runs tests)
// Then reports back
await orchestrator.completeWorkUnit('42', '42.1', 'RED', {
success: true,
testsCreated: ['src/__tests__/schema.test.js'],
testsFailed: 3
});
// Query again for next phase
const nextWorkUnit = await orchestrator.getNextWorkUnit('42');
// => { phase: 'GREEN', subtask: '42.1', action: 'Implement code to pass tests', ... }
```
## Design Decisions
### Why commit per subtask instead of per task?
**Decision**: Commit after each subtask's green state, not after the entire task.
**Rationale**:
- Atomic commits make code review easier (reviewers can see logical progression)
- Easier to revert a single subtask if it causes issues downstream
- Matches the TDD loop's natural checkpoint and cognitive boundary
- Provides resumability points if the run is interrupted
**Trade-off**: More commits per task (can use squash-merge in PRs if desired)
### Why not support parallel subtask execution?
**Decision**: Sequential subtask execution in Phase 1; parallel execution deferred to Phase 3.
**Rationale**:
- Subtasks often have implicit dependencies (e.g., schema before endpoint, endpoint before UI)
- Simpler orchestrator state machine (less complexity = faster to ship)
- Parallel execution requires explicit dependency DAG and conflict resolution
- Can be added in Phase 3 once core workflow is proven stable
**Trade-off**: Slower for truly independent subtasks (mitigated by keeping subtasks small and focused)
### Why require 80% coverage by default?
**Decision**: Enforce 80% coverage threshold (lines/branches/functions/statements) before allowing commits.
**Rationale**:
- Industry standard baseline for production code quality
- Forces test generation to be comprehensive, not superficial
- Configurable per project via `.taskmaster/config.json` if too strict
- Prevents "green tests" that only test happy paths
**Trade-off**: May require more test generation iterations; can be lowered per project
### Why use tmux instead of a rich GUI?
**Decision**: MVP uses tmux split panes for TUI, not Electron/web-based GUI.
**Rationale**:
- Tmux is universally available on dev machines; no installation burden
- Terminal-first workflows match developer mental model (no context switching)
- Simpler to implement and maintain; can add GUI later via extensions
- State stored in files allows IDE/extension integration without coupling
**Trade-off**: Less visual polish than GUI; requires tmux familiarity
### Why not support multiple executors (codex/gemini/claude) in Phase 1?
**Decision**: Start with Claude executor only; add others in Phase 2+.
**Rationale**:
- Reduces scope and complexity for initial delivery
- Claude Code already integrated with existing executor service
- Executor abstraction already exists; adding more is straightforward later
- Different executors may need different prompt strategies (requires experimentation)
**Trade-off**: Users locked to Claude initially; can work around with manual executor selection
## Risks and Mitigations
- Model hallucination/large diffs: restrict prompt scope; enforce minimal changes; show diff previews (optional) before commit.
- Flaky tests: allow retries, isolate targeted runs for speed, then full suite before commit.
- Environment variability: detect runners/tools; provide fallbacks and actionable errors.
- PR creation fails: still push and print manual commands; persist PR body to reuse.
## Open Questions
1) Slugging rules for branch names; any length limits or normalization beyond {slug} token sanitize?
2) PR body standard sections beyond run report (e.g., checklist, coverage table)?
3) Default executor prompt fine-tuning once codex/gemini integration is available.
4) Where to store persistent TUI state (pane layout, last selection) in .taskmaster/state.json?
## Branch Naming
- Include both the tag and the task id in the branch name to make lineage explicit.
- Default pattern: <tag>/task-<id>[-slug] (e.g., master/task-12, tag-analytics/task-4-user-auth).
- Configurable via .taskmaster/config.json: git.branchPattern supports tokens {tag}, {id}, {slug}.
## PR Base Branch
- Use the repositorys default branch (detected via git) unless overridden.
- Title format: Task #<id> [<tag>]: <title>.
## RPG Mapping (Repository Planning Graph)
Functional nodes (capabilities):
- Autopilot Orchestration → drives TDD loop and lifecycle
- Test Generation (Surgical) → produces failing tests from subtask context
- Test Execution + Coverage → runs suite, enforces thresholds
- Git/Branch/PR Management → safe operations and PR creation
- TUI/Terminal Integration → interactive control and visibility via tmux
- MCP Integration → structured task/status/context operations
Structural nodes (code organization):
- packages/tm-core:
- services/workflow-orchestrator.ts (new)
- services/test-runner-adapter.ts (new)
- services/git-adapter.ts (new)
- existing: task-service.ts, task-execution-service.ts, executors/*
- apps/cli:
- src/commands/autopilot.command.ts (new)
- src/ui/tui/ (new tmux/TUI helpers)
- scripts/modules:
- reuse utils/git-utils.js, task-manager/tag-management.js
- .claude/agents/:
- surgical-test-generator.md
Edges (data/control flow):
- Autopilot → Test Generation → Test Execution → Git Commit → loop
- Autopilot → Git Adapter (branch, tag, PR)
- Autopilot → TUI (event stream) → tmux pane control
- Autopilot → MCP tools for task/status updates
- Test Execution → Coverage gate → Autopilot decision
Topological traversal (implementation order):
1) Git/Test adapters (foundations)
2) Orchestrator skeleton + events
3) CLI autopilot command and dry-run
4) Surgical test-gen integration and execution gate
5) PR creation, run reports, resumability
## Phased Roadmap
- Phase 0: Spike
- Implement CLI skeleton tm autopilot with dry-run showing planned steps from a real task + subtasks.
- Detect test runner (package.json) and git state; render a preflight report.
- Phase 1: Core Rails (State Machine & Orchestration)
- Implement WorkflowOrchestrator in tm-core as a **state machine** that tracks TDD phases per subtask.
- Orchestrator **guides** the current AI session (Claude Code/MCP client) rather than executing code itself.
- Add Git/Test adapters for status checks and validation (not direct execution).
- WorkflowOrchestrator API:
- `getNextWorkUnit(taskId)` → returns next phase to execute (RED/GREEN/COMMIT) with context
- `completeWorkUnit(taskId, subtaskId, phase, result)` → records completion and advances state
- `getRunState(taskId)` → returns current progress and resumability data
- MCP integration: expose work unit endpoints so Claude Code can query "what to do next" and report back.
- Branch/tag mapping via existing tag-management APIs.
- Run report persisted under .taskmaster/reports/runs/ with state checkpoints for resumability.
- Phase 2: PR + Resumability
- Add gh PR creation with well-formed body using the run report.
- Introduce resumable checkpoints and --resume flag.
- Add coverage enforcement and optional lint/format step.
- Phase 3: Extensibility + Guardrails
- Add support for basic pytest/go test adapters.
- Add safeguards: diff preview mode, manual confirm gates, aggressive minimal-change prompts.
- Optional: small TUI panel and extension panel leveraging the same run state file.
## References (Repo)
- Test Workflow: .cursor/rules/test_workflow.mdc
- Git Workflow: .cursor/rules/git_workflow.mdc
- CLI: apps/cli/src/commands/start.command.ts, apps/cli/src/ui/components/*.ts
- Core Services: packages/tm-core/src/services/task-service.ts, task-execution-service.ts
- Executors: packages/tm-core/src/executors/*
- Git Utilities: scripts/modules/utils/git-utils.js
- Tag Management: scripts/modules/task-manager/tag-management.js
- Surgical Test Generator: .claude/agents/surgical-test-generator.md