docs: update changeset with model config while preserving existing changes
This commit is contained in:
66
tasks/task_049.txt
Normal file
66
tasks/task_049.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# Task ID: 49
|
||||
# Title: Implement Code Quality Analysis Command
|
||||
# Status: pending
|
||||
# Dependencies: None
|
||||
# Priority: medium
|
||||
# Description: Create a command that analyzes the codebase to identify patterns and verify functions against current best practices, generating improvement recommendations and potential refactoring tasks.
|
||||
# Details:
|
||||
Develop a new command called `analyze-code-quality` that performs the following functions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Pattern Recognition**:
|
||||
- Scan the codebase to identify recurring patterns in code structure, function design, and architecture
|
||||
- Categorize patterns by frequency and impact on maintainability
|
||||
- Generate a report of common patterns with examples from the codebase
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Best Practice Verification**:
|
||||
- For each function in specified files, extract its purpose, parameters, and implementation details
|
||||
- Create a verification checklist for each function that includes:
|
||||
- Function naming conventions
|
||||
- Parameter handling
|
||||
- Error handling
|
||||
- Return value consistency
|
||||
- Documentation quality
|
||||
- Complexity metrics
|
||||
- Use an API integration with Perplexity or similar AI service to evaluate each function against current best practices
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Improvement Recommendations**:
|
||||
- Generate specific refactoring suggestions for functions that don't align with best practices
|
||||
- Include code examples of the recommended improvements
|
||||
- Estimate the effort required for each refactoring suggestion
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Task Integration**:
|
||||
- Create a mechanism to convert high-value improvement recommendations into Taskmaster tasks
|
||||
- Allow users to select which recommendations to convert to tasks
|
||||
- Generate properly formatted task descriptions that include the current implementation, recommended changes, and justification
|
||||
|
||||
The command should accept parameters for targeting specific directories or files, setting the depth of analysis, and filtering by improvement impact level.
|
||||
|
||||
# Test Strategy:
|
||||
Testing should verify all aspects of the code analysis command:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Functionality Testing**:
|
||||
- Create a test codebase with known patterns and anti-patterns
|
||||
- Verify the command correctly identifies all patterns in the test codebase
|
||||
- Check that function verification correctly flags issues in deliberately non-compliant functions
|
||||
- Confirm recommendations are relevant and implementable
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Integration Testing**:
|
||||
- Test the AI service integration with mock responses to ensure proper handling of API calls
|
||||
- Verify the task creation workflow correctly generates well-formed tasks
|
||||
- Test integration with existing Taskmaster commands and workflows
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance Testing**:
|
||||
- Measure execution time on codebases of various sizes
|
||||
- Ensure memory usage remains reasonable even on large codebases
|
||||
- Test with rate limiting on API calls to ensure graceful handling
|
||||
|
||||
4. **User Experience Testing**:
|
||||
- Have developers use the command on real projects and provide feedback
|
||||
- Verify the output is actionable and clear
|
||||
- Test the command with different parameter combinations
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Validation Criteria**:
|
||||
- Command successfully analyzes at least 95% of functions in the codebase
|
||||
- Generated recommendations are specific and actionable
|
||||
- Created tasks follow the project's task format standards
|
||||
- Analysis results are consistent across multiple runs on the same codebase
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user