Unify and streamline profile system architecture (#853)

* move claude rules and commands to assets/claude

* update claude profile to copy assets/claude to .claude

* fix formatting

* feat(profiles): Implement unified profile system

- Convert Claude and Codex profiles to use createProfile() factory
- Remove simple vs complex profile distinction in rule transformer
- Unify convertAllRulesToProfileRules() to handle all profiles consistently
- Fix mcpConfigPath construction in base-profile.js for null mcpConfigName
- Update terminology from 'simpleProfiles' to 'assetOnlyProfiles' throughout
- Ensure Claude .claude directory copying works in both CLI and MCP contexts
- All profiles now follow same execution flow with proper lifecycle functions

Changes:
- src/profiles/claude.js: Convert to createProfile() factory pattern
- src/profiles/codex.js: Convert to createProfile() factory pattern
- src/utils/rule-transformer.js: Unified profile handling logic
- src/utils/profiles.js: Remove simple profile categorization
- src/profiles/base-profile.js: Fix mcpConfigPath construction
- scripts/modules/commands.js: Update variable naming
- tests/: Update all tests for unified system and terminology

Fixes Claude profile asset copying issue in MCP context.
All tests passing (617 passed, 11 skipped).

* re-checkin claude files

* fix formatting

* chore: clean up test Claude rules files

* chore: add changeset for unified profile system

* add claude files back

* add changeset

* restore proper gitignore

* remove claude agents file from root

* remove incorrect doc

* simplify profiles and update tests

* update changeset

* update changeset

* remove profile specific code

* streamline profiles with defaults and update tests

* update changeset

* add newline at end of gitignore

* restore changes

* streamline profiles with defaults; update tests and add vscode test

* update rule profile tests

* update wording for clearer profile management

* refactor and clarify terminology

* use original projectRoot var name

* revert param desc

* use updated claude assets from neno

* add "YOUR_" before api key here

* streamline codex profile

* add gemini profile

* update gemini profile

* update tests

* relocate function

* update rules interactive setup Gemini desc

* remove duplicative code

* add comma

assets/claude/commands/tm/analyze-complexity/analyze-complexity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+Analyze task complexity and generate expansion recommendations.
+
+Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Perform deep analysis of task complexity across the project.
+
+## Complexity Analysis
+
+Uses AI to analyze tasks and recommend which ones need breakdown.
+
+## Execution Options
+
+```bash
+task-master analyze-complexity [--research] [--threshold=5]
+```
+
+## Analysis Parameters
+
+- `--research` → Use research AI for deeper analysis
+- `--threshold=5` → Only flag tasks above complexity 5
+- Default: Analyze all pending tasks
+
+## Analysis Process
+
+### 1. **Task Evaluation**
+For each task, AI evaluates:
+- Technical complexity
+- Time requirements
+- Dependency complexity
+- Risk factors
+- Knowledge requirements
+
+### 2. **Complexity Scoring**
+Assigns score 1-10 based on:
+- Implementation difficulty
+- Integration challenges
+- Testing requirements
+- Unknown factors
+- Technical debt risk
+
+### 3. **Recommendations**
+For complex tasks:
+- Suggest expansion approach
+- Recommend subtask breakdown
+- Identify risk areas
+- Propose mitigation strategies
+
+## Smart Analysis Features
+
+1. **Pattern Recognition**
+   - Similar task comparisons
+   - Historical complexity accuracy
+   - Team velocity consideration
+   - Technology stack factors
+
+2. **Contextual Factors**
+   - Team expertise
+   - Available resources
+   - Timeline constraints
+   - Business criticality
+
+3. **Risk Assessment**
+   - Technical risks
+   - Timeline risks
+   - Dependency risks
+   - Knowledge gaps
+
+## Output Format
+
+```
+Task Complexity Analysis Report
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+High Complexity Tasks (>7):
+📍 #5 "Implement real-time sync" - Score: 9/10
+   Factors: WebSocket complexity, state management, conflict resolution
+   Recommendation: Expand into 5-7 subtasks
+   Risks: Performance, data consistency
+
+📍 #12 "Migrate database schema" - Score: 8/10
+   Factors: Data migration, zero downtime, rollback strategy
+   Recommendation: Expand into 4-5 subtasks
+   Risks: Data loss, downtime
+
+Medium Complexity Tasks (5-7):
+📍 #23 "Add export functionality" - Score: 6/10
+   Consider expansion if timeline tight
+
+Low Complexity Tasks (<5):
+✅ 15 tasks - No expansion needed
+
+Summary:
+- Expand immediately: 2 tasks
+- Consider expanding: 5 tasks
+- Keep as-is: 15 tasks
+```
+
+## Actionable Output
+
+For each high-complexity task:
+1. Complexity score with reasoning
+2. Specific expansion suggestions
+3. Risk mitigation approaches
+4. Recommended subtask structure
+
+## Integration
+
+Results are:
+- Saved to `.taskmaster/reports/complexity-analysis.md`
+- Used by expand command
+- Inform sprint planning
+- Guide resource allocation
+
+## Next Steps
+
+After analysis:
+```
+/project:tm/expand 5    # Expand specific task
+/project:tm/expand/all  # Expand all recommended
+/project:tm/complexity-report  # View detailed report
+```