chore: remove generateObject documentation files
This commit is contained in:
Ben Vargas
committed by
Ralph Khreish
Ralph Khreish
parent
a2de49dd90
commit
6b15788c58
@@ -1,632 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Task Master generateObject Migration - Sequential Implementation Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Review Summary
|
||||
|
||||
As a system architect, I've reviewed the migration plan and confirm:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Technical Feasibility**: ✅ All infrastructure is in place
|
||||
2. **Risk Assessment**: ✅ Low risk with high reward
|
||||
3. **Implementation Approach**: ✅ Phased migration is optimal
|
||||
4. **Provider Compatibility**: ✅ Verified all providers support generateObject
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequential Task Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Prerequisites
|
||||
- All tasks should be executed in order
|
||||
- Each task includes specific success criteria
|
||||
- Test each task before proceeding to the next
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 1: Schema Infrastructure (Tasks 1-10)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 1: Create Schema Directory Structure
|
||||
**File**: Create directory `src/schemas/`
|
||||
**Action**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p src/schemas
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Directory exists at `src/schemas/`
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 2: Define Base Task Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/base-schemas.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Create reusable base schemas
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
|
||||
// Base schemas that will be reused across commands
|
||||
export const TaskStatusSchema = z.enum(['pending', 'in-progress', 'blocked', 'done', 'cancelled', 'deferred']);
|
||||
|
||||
export const BaseTaskSchema = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.number().int().positive(),
|
||||
title: z.string().min(1).max(200),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
status: TaskStatusSchema,
|
||||
dependencies: z.array(z.union([z.number().int(), z.string()])).default([]),
|
||||
priority: z.enum(['low', 'medium', 'high', 'critical']).nullable().default(null),
|
||||
details: z.string().nullable().default(null),
|
||||
testStrategy: z.string().nullable().default(null)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const SubtaskSchema = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.number().int().positive(),
|
||||
title: z.string().min(5).max(200),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(10),
|
||||
dependencies: z.array(z.number().int()).default([]),
|
||||
details: z.string().min(20),
|
||||
status: z.enum(['pending', 'done', 'completed']).default('pending'),
|
||||
testStrategy: z.string().nullable().default(null)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: File created with working imports
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 3: Create Update Tasks Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/update-tasks.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for update-tasks command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { BaseTaskSchema } from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdatedTaskSchema = BaseTaskSchema.extend({
|
||||
subtasks: z.array(z.any()).nullable().default(null)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdateTasksResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
tasks: z.array(UpdatedTaskSchema)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates sample task data correctly
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 4: Create Expand Task Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/expand-task.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for expand-task command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { SubtaskSchema } from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const ExpandTaskResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
subtasks: z.array(SubtaskSchema)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates subtask array structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 5: Create Complexity Analysis Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/analyze-complexity.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for analyze-complexity command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
|
||||
export const ComplexityAnalysisItemSchema = z.object({
|
||||
taskId: z.number().int().positive(),
|
||||
taskTitle: z.string(),
|
||||
complexityScore: z.number().min(1).max(10),
|
||||
recommendedSubtasks: z.number().int().positive(),
|
||||
expansionPrompt: z.string(),
|
||||
reasoning: z.string()
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
complexityAnalysis: z.array(ComplexityAnalysisItemSchema)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates complexity analysis data
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 6: Create Update Subtask Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/update-subtask.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for update-subtask-by-id command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { SubtaskSchema } from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdateSubtaskResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
subtask: SubtaskSchema
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates single subtask update
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 7: Create Update Task Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/update-task.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for update-task-by-id command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { UpdatedTaskSchema } from './update-tasks.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdateTaskResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
task: UpdatedTaskSchema
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates single task update
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 8: Create Add Task Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/add-task.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for add-task command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { BaseTaskSchema } from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const NewTaskSchema = BaseTaskSchema.omit({ id: true }).extend({
|
||||
subtasks: z.array(z.any()).optional().default([])
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const AddTaskResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
task: BaseTaskSchema.extend({
|
||||
subtasks: z.array(z.any()).optional().default([])
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates new task creation
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 9: Create Parse PRD Schema
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/parse-prd.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Define schema for parse-prd command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
import { BaseTaskSchema } from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const ParsedTaskSchema = BaseTaskSchema.omit({ id: true, status: true }).extend({
|
||||
status: z.literal('pending').default('pending')
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const ParsePRDResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
tasks: z.array(ParsedTaskSchema),
|
||||
projectName: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
summary: z.string().optional()
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Schema validates PRD parsing output
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 10: Create Schema Registry
|
||||
**File**: `src/schemas/registry.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Create central schema registry
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { UpdateTasksResponseSchema } from './update-tasks.js';
|
||||
import { ExpandTaskResponseSchema } from './expand-task.js';
|
||||
import { ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema } from './analyze-complexity.js';
|
||||
import { UpdateSubtaskResponseSchema } from './update-subtask.js';
|
||||
import { UpdateTaskResponseSchema } from './update-task.js';
|
||||
import { AddTaskResponseSchema } from './add-task.js';
|
||||
import { ParsePRDResponseSchema } from './parse-prd.js';
|
||||
|
||||
export const COMMAND_SCHEMAS = {
|
||||
'update-tasks': UpdateTasksResponseSchema,
|
||||
'expand-task': ExpandTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'analyze-complexity': ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema,
|
||||
'update-subtask-by-id': UpdateSubtaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'update-task-by-id': UpdateTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'add-task': AddTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'parse-prd': ParsePRDResponseSchema
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Export individual schemas for direct access
|
||||
export * from './update-tasks.js';
|
||||
export * from './expand-task.js';
|
||||
export * from './analyze-complexity.js';
|
||||
export * from './update-subtask.js';
|
||||
export * from './update-task.js';
|
||||
export * from './add-task.js';
|
||||
export * from './parse-prd.js';
|
||||
export * from './base-schemas.js';
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: All schemas imported and accessible via registry
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 2: Prompt Template Updates (Tasks 11-17)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 11: Update analyze-complexity Prompt
|
||||
**File**: `src/prompts/analyze-complexity.json`
|
||||
**Action**: Remove JSON formatting instructions from user prompt
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prompts": {
|
||||
"default": {
|
||||
"system": "You are an expert software architect and project manager analyzing task complexity. Your analysis should consider implementation effort, technical challenges, dependencies, and testing requirements.",
|
||||
"user": "Analyze the following tasks to determine their complexity (1-10 scale) and recommend the number of subtasks for expansion. Provide a brief reasoning and an initial expansion prompt for each.{{#if useResearch}} Consider current best practices, common implementation patterns, and industry standards in your analysis.{{/if}}\n\nTasks:\n{{{json tasks}}}{{#if gatheredContext}}\n\n# Project Context\n\n{{gatheredContext}}{{/if}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Prompt no longer contains "Respond ONLY with JSON" type instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 12: Update expand-task Prompt
|
||||
**File**: `src/prompts/expand-task.json`
|
||||
**Action**: Remove JSON formatting instructions, update all variants
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prompts": {
|
||||
"complexity-report": {
|
||||
"condition": "expansionPrompt",
|
||||
"system": "You are an AI assistant helping with task breakdown. Generate {{#if (gt subtaskCount 0)}}exactly {{subtaskCount}}{{else}}an appropriate number of{{/if}} subtasks based on the provided prompt and context.",
|
||||
"user": "{{expansionPrompt}}{{#if additionalContext}}\n\n{{additionalContext}}{{/if}}{{#if complexityReasoningContext}}\n\n{{complexityReasoningContext}}{{/if}}{{#if gatheredContext}}\n\n# Project Context\n\n{{gatheredContext}}{{/if}}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"research": {
|
||||
"condition": "useResearch === true && !expansionPrompt",
|
||||
"system": "You are an AI assistant with research capabilities analyzing and breaking down software development tasks.",
|
||||
"user": "Analyze the following task and break it down into {{#if (gt subtaskCount 0)}}exactly {{subtaskCount}}{{else}}an appropriate number of{{/if}} specific subtasks. Each subtask should be actionable and well-defined.\n\nParent Task:\nID: {{task.id}}\nTitle: {{task.title}}\nDescription: {{task.description}}\nCurrent details: {{#if task.details}}{{task.details}}{{else}}None{{/if}}{{#if additionalContext}}\nConsider this context: {{additionalContext}}{{/if}}{{#if complexityReasoningContext}}\nComplexity Analysis Reasoning: {{complexityReasoningContext}}{{/if}}{{#if gatheredContext}}\n\n# Project Context\n\n{{gatheredContext}}{{/if}}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"default": {
|
||||
"system": "You are an AI assistant helping with task breakdown for software development. Break down high-level tasks into specific, actionable subtasks that can be implemented sequentially.",
|
||||
"user": "Break down this task into {{#if (gt subtaskCount 0)}}exactly {{subtaskCount}}{{else}}an appropriate number of{{/if}} specific subtasks:\n\nTask ID: {{task.id}}\nTitle: {{task.title}}\nDescription: {{task.description}}\nCurrent details: {{#if task.details}}{{task.details}}{{else}}None{{/if}}{{#if additionalContext}}\nAdditional context: {{additionalContext}}{{/if}}{{#if complexityReasoningContext}}\nComplexity Analysis Reasoning: {{complexityReasoningContext}}{{/if}}{{#if gatheredContext}}\n\n# Project Context\n\n{{gatheredContext}}{{/if}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: All prompt variants updated without JSON instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 13: Update update-tasks Prompt
|
||||
**File**: `src/prompts/update-tasks.json`
|
||||
**Action**: Remove JSON formatting instructions
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prompts": {
|
||||
"default": {
|
||||
"system": "You are an AI assistant helping to update software development tasks based on new context.\nYou will be given a set of tasks and a prompt describing changes or new implementation details.\nYour job is to update the tasks to reflect these changes, while preserving their basic structure.\n\nGuidelines:\n1. Maintain the same IDs, statuses, and dependencies unless specifically mentioned in the prompt\n2. Update titles, descriptions, details, and test strategies to reflect the new information\n3. Do not change anything unnecessarily - just adapt what needs to change based on the prompt\n4. Return ALL the tasks in order, not just the modified ones\n5. VERY IMPORTANT: Preserve all subtasks marked as \"done\" or \"completed\" - do not modify their content\n6. For tasks with completed subtasks, build upon what has already been done rather than rewriting everything\n7. If an existing completed subtask needs to be changed/undone based on the new context, DO NOT modify it directly\n8. Instead, add a new subtask that clearly indicates what needs to be changed or replaced\n9. Use the existence of completed subtasks as an opportunity to make new subtasks more specific and targeted",
|
||||
"user": "Here are the tasks to update:\n{{{json tasks}}}\n\nPlease update these tasks based on the following new context:\n{{updatePrompt}}\n\nIMPORTANT: In the tasks above, any subtasks with \"status\": \"done\" or \"status\": \"completed\" should be preserved exactly as is. Build your changes around these completed items.{{#if projectContext}}\n\n# Project Context\n\n{{projectContext}}{{/if}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Prompt updated without "Return only JSON" instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 14: Update Remaining Command Prompts
|
||||
**Files**:
|
||||
- `src/prompts/update-subtask.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/update-task.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/add-task.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/parse-prd.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Remove all JSON formatting instructions from each file
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: All prompts updated consistently
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 15: Create Prompt Migration Test
|
||||
**File**: `tests/unit/prompts/prompt-migration.test.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Create test to ensure no JSON instructions remain
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import fs from 'fs';
|
||||
import path from 'path';
|
||||
import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';
|
||||
|
||||
const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
|
||||
const promptsDir = path.join(__dirname, '../../../src/prompts');
|
||||
|
||||
describe('Prompt Migration Validation', () => {
|
||||
const bannedPhrases = [
|
||||
'Respond ONLY with',
|
||||
'Return only the',
|
||||
'valid JSON',
|
||||
'Do not include any explanatory text',
|
||||
'markdown formatting',
|
||||
'code block markers',
|
||||
'Return ONLY'
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
test('prompts should not contain JSON formatting instructions', () => {
|
||||
const promptFiles = fs.readdirSync(promptsDir)
|
||||
.filter(file => file.endsWith('.json') && !file.includes('schema'));
|
||||
|
||||
promptFiles.forEach(file => {
|
||||
const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(promptsDir, file), 'utf8');
|
||||
const promptData = JSON.parse(content);
|
||||
|
||||
bannedPhrases.forEach(phrase => {
|
||||
expect(content.toLowerCase()).not.toContain(phrase.toLowerCase());
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Test passes for all prompt files
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 3: Command Migration - Phase 1 (Tasks 16-25)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 16: Migrate analyze-complexity Command
|
||||
**File**: `scripts/modules/task-manager/analyze-task-complexity.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Replace generateTextService with generateObjectService
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add imports:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { generateObjectService } from '../ai-services-unified.js';
|
||||
import { COMMAND_SCHEMAS } from '../../../src/schemas/registry.js';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. Replace AI service call (around line 428):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// OLD CODE TO REMOVE:
|
||||
// aiServiceResponse = await generateTextService({
|
||||
// prompt,
|
||||
// systemPrompt,
|
||||
// role,
|
||||
// session,
|
||||
// projectRoot,
|
||||
// commandName: 'analyze-complexity',
|
||||
// outputType: mcpLog ? 'mcp' : 'cli'
|
||||
// });
|
||||
|
||||
// NEW CODE:
|
||||
aiServiceResponse = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
prompt,
|
||||
systemPrompt,
|
||||
role,
|
||||
session,
|
||||
projectRoot,
|
||||
schema: COMMAND_SCHEMAS['analyze-complexity'],
|
||||
objectName: 'complexity_analysis',
|
||||
commandName: 'analyze-complexity',
|
||||
outputType: mcpLog ? 'mcp' : 'cli'
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Replace parsing logic (around line 450-486):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// OLD CODE TO REMOVE (entire parsing block):
|
||||
// reportLog('Parsing complexity analysis from text response...', 'info');
|
||||
// try { ... } catch (parseError) { ... }
|
||||
|
||||
// NEW CODE:
|
||||
complexityAnalysis = aiServiceResponse.mainResult.complexityAnalysis;
|
||||
reportLog(`Received ${complexityAnalysis.length} complexity analyses from AI.`, 'info');
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. Delete the internal prompt generation function (lines 33-64)
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Command executes successfully with generateObject
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 17: Create Integration Test for analyze-complexity
|
||||
**File**: `tests/integration/commands/analyze-complexity.test.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Test the migrated command
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import analyzeTaskComplexity from '../../../scripts/modules/task-manager/analyze-task-complexity.js';
|
||||
import { readJSON } from '../../../scripts/modules/utils.js';
|
||||
|
||||
describe('analyze-complexity with generateObject', () => {
|
||||
test('should return structured complexity analysis', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await analyzeTaskComplexity({
|
||||
file: 'test-tasks.json',
|
||||
output: 'test-complexity.json'
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toHaveProperty('report');
|
||||
expect(result.report).toHaveProperty('complexityAnalysis');
|
||||
expect(Array.isArray(result.report.complexityAnalysis)).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
if (result.report.complexityAnalysis.length > 0) {
|
||||
const analysis = result.report.complexityAnalysis[0];
|
||||
expect(analysis).toHaveProperty('taskId');
|
||||
expect(analysis).toHaveProperty('complexityScore');
|
||||
expect(analysis).toHaveProperty('recommendedSubtasks');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Test passes with real AI provider
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 18: Migrate update-task-by-id Command
|
||||
**File**: `scripts/modules/task-manager/update-task-by-id.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Similar migration pattern as Task 16
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Single task updates work with generateObject
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 19: Create Integration Test for update-task-by-id
|
||||
**File**: `tests/integration/commands/update-task-by-id.test.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Test single task update functionality
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Test validates structured response
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 4: Command Migration - Phase 2 (Tasks 20-30)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 20: Migrate expand-task Command
|
||||
**File**: `scripts/modules/task-manager/expand-task.js`
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add imports:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { generateObjectService } from '../ai-services-unified.js';
|
||||
import { COMMAND_SCHEMAS } from '../../../src/schemas/registry.js';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. Replace generateTextService call (around line 533):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
aiServiceResponse = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
prompt: promptContent,
|
||||
systemPrompt: systemPrompt,
|
||||
role,
|
||||
session,
|
||||
projectRoot,
|
||||
schema: COMMAND_SCHEMAS['expand-task'],
|
||||
objectName: 'task_expansion',
|
||||
commandName: 'expand-task',
|
||||
outputType: outputFormat
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Replace parsing (around line 543):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// OLD: generatedSubtasks = parseSubtasksFromText(...);
|
||||
// NEW:
|
||||
generatedSubtasks = aiServiceResponse.mainResult.subtasks;
|
||||
logger.info(`Received ${generatedSubtasks.length} subtasks from AI.`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. Delete parseSubtasksFromText function (lines 74-278)
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Subtask expansion works correctly
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 21: Migrate update-tasks Command
|
||||
**File**: `scripts/modules/task-manager/update-tasks.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Most complex migration - handle multiple tasks
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Bulk task updates work with structured output
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 22: Create Comprehensive Test Suite
|
||||
**File**: `tests/integration/generateObject-migration.test.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Test all migrated commands together
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: All commands pass integration tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 5: Provider Validation (Tasks 23-27)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 23: Validate Claude-Code Provider
|
||||
**File**: `tests/integration/providers/claude-code-object.test.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Test generateObject with claude-code provider
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { generateObjectService } from '../../../scripts/modules/ai-services-unified.js';
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
|
||||
describe('Claude-Code generateObject support', () => {
|
||||
test('should handle structured output correctly', async () => {
|
||||
const TestSchema = z.object({
|
||||
message: z.string(),
|
||||
number: z.number()
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
role: 'main',
|
||||
prompt: 'Generate a test object with message "Hello" and number 42',
|
||||
systemPrompt: 'You are a test assistant.',
|
||||
schema: TestSchema,
|
||||
objectName: 'test_object',
|
||||
commandName: 'test-command'
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.mainResult).toEqual({
|
||||
message: 'Hello',
|
||||
number: 42
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Claude-code handles generateObject
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 24: Test Provider Fallback
|
||||
**Action**: Verify fallback sequence works with generateObject
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: System falls back correctly when providers fail
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 6: Migration Completion (Tasks 28-35)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 25: Remove All Parsing Functions
|
||||
**Action**: Delete all parse*FromText functions
|
||||
**Files to modify**:
|
||||
- Remove `parseUpdatedTasksFromText` from update-tasks.js
|
||||
- Remove `parseSubtasksFromText` from expand-task.js
|
||||
- Remove similar functions from all command files
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: No parsing functions remain
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 26: Update Error Handling
|
||||
**Action**: Replace parsing error handlers with schema validation handlers
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Clear error messages for validation failures
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 27: Performance Benchmarking
|
||||
**File**: `tests/benchmarks/generateObject-performance.js`
|
||||
**Action**: Compare performance before/after migration
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Performance meets or exceeds current implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 28: Update Documentation
|
||||
**Files**:
|
||||
- `README.md`
|
||||
- `docs/api-reference.md`
|
||||
- `docs/migration-guide.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Document the new structured output approach
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Documentation reflects new architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 29: Final Integration Testing
|
||||
**Action**: Run full test suite with all commands migrated
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: 100% test pass rate
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 30: Create Rollback Documentation
|
||||
**File**: `docs/rollback-procedure.md`
|
||||
**Action**: Document how to rollback if needed
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Clear rollback steps documented
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Group 7: Cleanup and Optimization (Tasks 31-35)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 31: Remove Temporary Code
|
||||
**Action**: Remove any temporary compatibility layers
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Clean codebase without migration artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 32: Optimize Prompts
|
||||
**Action**: Fine-tune prompts for structured output
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Improved response quality
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 33: Add Telemetry
|
||||
**Action**: Add metrics for generateObject performance
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Performance metrics available
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 34: Security Review
|
||||
**Action**: Review schema validation for security issues
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: No injection vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 35: Final Code Review
|
||||
**Action**: Complete code review of all changes
|
||||
**Success Criteria**: Code meets quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Notes for AI LLMs
|
||||
|
||||
### When implementing each task:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read the existing code first** - Use Read tool to understand current implementation
|
||||
2. **Make incremental changes** - Don't try to change too much at once
|
||||
3. **Test after each change** - Run relevant tests before proceeding
|
||||
4. **Preserve functionality** - Ensure backward compatibility during migration
|
||||
5. **Document changes** - Add comments explaining significant modifications
|
||||
|
||||
### Common Patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Import Pattern**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { generateObjectService } from '../ai-services-unified.js';
|
||||
import { COMMAND_SCHEMAS } from '../../../src/schemas/registry.js';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Service Call Pattern**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
...existingParams,
|
||||
schema: COMMAND_SCHEMAS[commandName],
|
||||
objectName: descriptive_name,
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Result Access Pattern**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const result = aiServiceResponse.mainResult.propertyName;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling:
|
||||
|
||||
When you encounter schema validation errors, the error will be clear:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Zod validation errors are descriptive
|
||||
// Example: "Expected number, received string at path: complexityScore"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Commands:
|
||||
|
||||
After modifying each command, test with:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Unit tests
|
||||
npm test -- path/to/specific/test.js
|
||||
|
||||
# Integration test
|
||||
node scripts/test-integration.js command-name
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
After completing all tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Reduction**: 500+ lines of parsing code removed
|
||||
2. **Error Rate**: 90% reduction in parsing errors
|
||||
3. **Performance**: 15-50% improvement in execution time
|
||||
4. **Reliability**: Zero JSON parsing failures
|
||||
5. **Maintainability**: Significantly improved with schema-driven approach
|
||||
|
||||
This sequential task plan provides a clear path for AI LLMs to implement the generateObject migration systematically and safely.
|
||||
@@ -1,359 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Task Master generateObject Migration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Moving from `generateText` to `generateObject` for Task Master commands would provide **significant benefits** in terms of reliability, maintainability, and performance. The current implementation uses complex JSON parsing logic that's prone to failures, while `generateObject` provides structured, validated output directly from the AI providers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Pain Points with Current `generateText` Approach
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Complex JSON Parsing Logic**: Functions like `parseUpdatedTasksFromText()` and `parseSubtasksFromText()` contain 200+ lines of fragile parsing code
|
||||
2. **Unreliable Response Parsing**: Multiple fallback strategies for extracting JSON from markdown, handling malformed responses, and dealing with truncated output
|
||||
3. **Inconsistent Error Handling**: Different parsing strategies for different commands, making debugging difficult
|
||||
4. **Performance Overhead**: Multiple regex operations, string manipulations, and retry logic for parsing
|
||||
5. **Maintenance Burden**: Complex parsing code requires constant updates for new edge cases
|
||||
|
||||
### Current generateText Usage Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Current pattern in all Task Master commands
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateTextService({
|
||||
role: serviceRole,
|
||||
session: session,
|
||||
projectRoot: projectRoot,
|
||||
systemPrompt: systemPrompt,
|
||||
prompt: userPrompt,
|
||||
commandName: 'update-tasks',
|
||||
outputType: outputType
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Then complex parsing with 200+ lines of fallback logic
|
||||
const parsedData = parseDataFromText(aiServiceResponse.mainResult, ...);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits of generateObject Migration
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **Reliability Improvements**
|
||||
- **Guaranteed Structure**: AI providers validate output against schemas before returning
|
||||
- **Type Safety**: Zod schema validation ensures data integrity
|
||||
- **No Parsing Failures**: Eliminates JSON parsing errors and edge cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Complexity Reduction**
|
||||
- **Eliminate Parsing Functions**: Remove 500+ lines of complex parsing logic
|
||||
- **Simplified Error Handling**: Consistent error patterns across all commands
|
||||
- **Cleaner Code**: Direct object access instead of text parsing
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Performance Benefits**
|
||||
- **Faster Execution**: No client-side JSON parsing overhead
|
||||
- **Reduced Retries**: No need for parsing-related retry logic
|
||||
- **Better Token Usage**: More efficient prompts without JSON formatting instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **Developer Experience**
|
||||
- **Better IDE Support**: Type-safe object access with IntelliSense
|
||||
- **Easier Debugging**: Clear schema validation errors
|
||||
- **Maintainable Code**: Schema-driven development approach
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Schema Definition and Validation
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.1 Define Zod Schemas for Each Command
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `src/schemas/`
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// src/schemas/update-tasks.js
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod';
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdatedTaskSchema = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.number().int(),
|
||||
title: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
status: z.enum(['pending', 'in-progress', 'blocked', 'done', 'cancelled']),
|
||||
dependencies: z.array(z.union([z.number().int(), z.string()])),
|
||||
priority: z.string().nullable(),
|
||||
details: z.string().nullable(),
|
||||
testStrategy: z.string().nullable(),
|
||||
subtasks: z.array(z.any()).nullable()
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const UpdatedTasksResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
tasks: z.array(UpdatedTaskSchema)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Commands to migrate**:
|
||||
- `update-tasks` → `UpdatedTasksResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `expand-task` → `ExpandTaskResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `analyze-complexity` → `ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `update-subtask-by-id` → `UpdatedSubtaskResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `update-task-by-id` → `UpdatedTaskResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `add-task` → `AddTaskResponseSchema`
|
||||
- `parse-prd` → `ParsePRDResponseSchema`
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.2 Create Schema Registry
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// src/schemas/registry.js
|
||||
import { UpdatedTasksResponseSchema } from './update-tasks.js';
|
||||
import { ExpandTaskResponseSchema } from './expand-task.js';
|
||||
// ... other imports
|
||||
|
||||
export const COMMAND_SCHEMAS = {
|
||||
'update-tasks': UpdatedTasksResponseSchema,
|
||||
'expand-task': ExpandTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'analyze-complexity': ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema,
|
||||
'update-subtask-by-id': UpdatedSubtaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'update-task-by-id': UpdatedTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'add-task': AddTaskResponseSchema,
|
||||
'parse-prd': ParsePRDResponseSchema
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Prompt Template Updates
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2.1 Modify Prompt Templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Current prompts contain JSON formatting instructions that are no longer needed**:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
// REMOVE these instructions from prompts:
|
||||
"Return only the updated tasks as a valid JSON array."
|
||||
"Do not include any explanatory text, markdown formatting, or code block markers."
|
||||
"Respond ONLY with a valid JSON object containing a single key \"subtasks\""
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**New prompt approach**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"system": "You are an AI assistant helping to update software development tasks based on new context. You will return a structured response with the updated tasks.",
|
||||
"user": "Here are the tasks to update:\n{{{json tasks}}}\n\nPlease update these tasks based on the following new context:\n{{updatePrompt}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2.2 Update Prompt Files
|
||||
|
||||
**Files to update**:
|
||||
- `src/prompts/update-tasks.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/expand-task.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/analyze-complexity.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/update-subtask.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/update-task.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/add-task.json`
|
||||
- `src/prompts/parse-prd.json`
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Command Implementation Migration
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.1 Update Command Functions
|
||||
|
||||
**Before (generateText pattern)**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateTextService({
|
||||
role: serviceRole,
|
||||
session: session,
|
||||
projectRoot: projectRoot,
|
||||
systemPrompt: systemPrompt,
|
||||
prompt: userPrompt,
|
||||
commandName: 'update-tasks',
|
||||
outputType: outputType
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const parsedUpdatedTasks = parseUpdatedTasksFromText(
|
||||
aiServiceResponse.mainResult,
|
||||
tasksToUpdate.length,
|
||||
logFn,
|
||||
isMCP
|
||||
);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After (generateObject pattern)**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
import { COMMAND_SCHEMAS } from '../schemas/registry.js';
|
||||
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
role: serviceRole,
|
||||
session: session,
|
||||
projectRoot: projectRoot,
|
||||
systemPrompt: systemPrompt,
|
||||
prompt: userPrompt,
|
||||
schema: COMMAND_SCHEMAS['update-tasks'],
|
||||
objectName: 'updated_tasks',
|
||||
commandName: 'update-tasks',
|
||||
outputType: outputType
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const parsedUpdatedTasks = aiServiceResponse.mainResult.tasks;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2 Remove Parsing Functions
|
||||
|
||||
**Delete these complex parsing functions**:
|
||||
- `parseUpdatedTasksFromText()` (227 lines) - `scripts/modules/task-manager/update-tasks.js:57-284`
|
||||
- `parseSubtasksFromText()` (200+ lines) - `scripts/modules/task-manager/expand-task.js:74-278`
|
||||
- Similar parsing functions in other command files
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Provider Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.1 Claude-Code Provider
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Status**: ✅ **Already Compatible**
|
||||
- `ClaudeCodeLanguageModel` has `defaultObjectGenerationMode = 'json'`
|
||||
- Handles object-json mode with JSON extraction
|
||||
- No changes needed
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.2 Other Providers
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: ✅ **Already Compatible**
|
||||
- All providers inherit from `BaseAIProvider`
|
||||
- `BaseAIProvider.generateObject()` uses Vercel AI SDK's `generateObject`
|
||||
- Universal compatibility across all providers
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.3 Provider-Specific Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
**Providers that don't support structured output**:
|
||||
- The unified service will fall back to other providers in the sequence
|
||||
- Error handling already exists for unsupported tool use
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5.1 Unit Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Update existing tests**:
|
||||
- `tests/unit/scripts/modules/task-manager/update-tasks.test.js`
|
||||
- `tests/unit/scripts/modules/task-manager/expand-task.test.js`
|
||||
- `tests/unit/scripts/modules/task-manager/analyze-task-complexity.test.js`
|
||||
|
||||
**New schema tests**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// tests/unit/schemas/update-tasks.test.js
|
||||
import { UpdatedTasksResponseSchema } from '../../../src/schemas/update-tasks.js';
|
||||
|
||||
describe('UpdatedTasksResponseSchema', () => {
|
||||
test('validates correct task structure', () => {
|
||||
const validData = {
|
||||
tasks: [{
|
||||
id: 1,
|
||||
title: 'Test Task',
|
||||
description: 'Test Description',
|
||||
status: 'pending',
|
||||
dependencies: [],
|
||||
priority: 'medium',
|
||||
details: 'Test details',
|
||||
testStrategy: 'Unit tests',
|
||||
subtasks: []
|
||||
}]
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
expect(() => UpdatedTasksResponseSchema.parse(validData)).not.toThrow();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5.2 Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Test scenarios**:
|
||||
- End-to-end command execution with real AI providers
|
||||
- Schema validation with malformed data
|
||||
- Provider fallback behavior
|
||||
- Performance benchmarks vs current implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Migration Execution
|
||||
|
||||
#### 6.1 Rollout Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended approach**: **Command-by-command migration**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Phase 6.1**: Migrate `analyze-complexity` (simplest command)
|
||||
2. **Phase 6.2**: Migrate `update-task-by-id` (single task)
|
||||
3. **Phase 6.3**: Migrate `expand-task` (moderate complexity)
|
||||
4. **Phase 6.4**: Migrate `update-tasks` (most complex)
|
||||
5. **Phase 6.5**: Migrate remaining commands
|
||||
|
||||
#### 6.2 Rollback Plan
|
||||
|
||||
**Each command can be rolled back independently**:
|
||||
- Keep old parsing functions temporarily
|
||||
- Feature flag to switch between generateText/generateObject
|
||||
- Gradual migration with fallback capability
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 7: Cleanup and Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
#### 7.1 Remove Legacy Code
|
||||
|
||||
**After successful migration**:
|
||||
- Delete parsing functions (500+ lines of code)
|
||||
- Remove JSON formatting instructions from prompts
|
||||
- Clean up error handling for parsing failures
|
||||
|
||||
#### 7.2 Performance Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
**Potential improvements**:
|
||||
- Reduce token usage by 10-15% (removing JSON formatting instructions)
|
||||
- Eliminate client-side parsing overhead
|
||||
- Faster command execution times
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### High Risk Items
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Provider Compatibility**: Some providers may not support structured output
|
||||
- **Mitigation**: Existing fallback sequence handles this
|
||||
- **Test**: Verify all configured providers support generateObject
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Schema Validation Failures**: AI might generate invalid structures
|
||||
- **Mitigation**: Zod provides clear error messages
|
||||
- **Test**: Comprehensive schema validation tests
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium Risk Items
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Prompt Quality**: New prompts may perform differently
|
||||
- **Mitigation**: A/B test prompts during migration
|
||||
- **Test**: Compare output quality before/after migration
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Performance Impact**: generateObject might be slower
|
||||
- **Mitigation**: Benchmark performance during testing
|
||||
- **Test**: Performance regression tests
|
||||
|
||||
### Low Risk Items
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Complexity**: New approach is actually simpler
|
||||
2. **Maintainability**: Significant improvement expected
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Metrics
|
||||
- [ ] 90% reduction in parsing-related errors
|
||||
- [ ] 50% reduction in command execution time
|
||||
- [ ] 15% reduction in token usage
|
||||
- [ ] 500+ lines of parsing code eliminated
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Metrics
|
||||
- [ ] 100% schema validation coverage
|
||||
- [ ] Zero JSON parsing failures
|
||||
- [ ] Consistent error handling across commands
|
||||
- [ ] Improved developer experience ratings
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline Estimate
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Duration**: 2-3 weeks
|
||||
|
||||
- **Phase 1-2** (Schema + Prompts): 3-4 days
|
||||
- **Phase 3** (Command Migration): 1-1.5 weeks
|
||||
- **Phase 4** (Provider Testing): 2-3 days
|
||||
- **Phase 5** (Testing): 3-4 days
|
||||
- **Phase 6** (Rollout): 2-3 days
|
||||
- **Phase 7** (Cleanup): 1-2 days
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
The migration from `generateText` to `generateObject` represents a **significant architectural improvement** that will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Dramatically reduce complexity** by eliminating 500+ lines of fragile parsing code
|
||||
2. **Improve reliability** through guaranteed structured output
|
||||
3. **Enhance performance** by removing client-side parsing overhead
|
||||
4. **Provide better developer experience** with type-safe, schema-validated responses
|
||||
|
||||
The existing infrastructure already supports this migration, making it a low-risk, high-value improvement to the Task Master codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation**: Proceed with the migration following the phased approach outlined above.
|
||||
@@ -1,138 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Task Master generateObject Migration Summary
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Overview
|
||||
|
||||
The Task Master codebase has been successfully migrated from `generateText` to `generateObject`, providing significant improvements in reliability, maintainability, and performance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Status: ✅ COMPLETE
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands Migrated
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|---------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| `analyze-complexity` | ✅ Complete | Uses structured ComplexityAnalysisResponseSchema |
|
||||
| `update-task-by-id` | ✅ Complete | Full update mode uses generateObject; append mode still uses generateText for plain text |
|
||||
| `expand-task` | ✅ Complete | Uses structured ExpandTaskResponseSchema |
|
||||
| `update-tasks` | ✅ Complete | Uses structured UpdatedTasksResponseSchema |
|
||||
| `add-task` | ✅ Complete | Already used generateObject with AiTaskDataSchema |
|
||||
| `parse-prd` | ✅ Complete | Already used generateObject with prdResponseSchema |
|
||||
| `update-subtask-by-id` | ➖ Not Migrated | Intentionally kept with generateText as it appends plain text blocks |
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Achievements
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. **Code Reduction**
|
||||
- **Removed**: 500+ lines of complex JSON parsing logic
|
||||
- **Deleted Functions**:
|
||||
- `parseUpdatedTasksFromText()` (227 lines)
|
||||
- `parseSubtasksFromText()` (213 lines)
|
||||
- `parseUpdatedTaskFromText()` (116 lines)
|
||||
- `parseComplexityAnalysisFromText()` (removed earlier)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. **Schema Implementation**
|
||||
- Created centralized schema directory: `src/schemas/`
|
||||
- Implemented base schemas for reusable components
|
||||
- Created command-specific schemas with proper validation
|
||||
- Established schema registry for easy access
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. **Prompt Updates**
|
||||
- Removed all JSON formatting instructions from prompts
|
||||
- Simplified prompt templates for better AI comprehension
|
||||
- Maintained backward compatibility for special cases
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. **Testing**
|
||||
- Created comprehensive integration test suite
|
||||
- Added migration verification tests
|
||||
- Ensured all commands work with real AI providers
|
||||
- Validated schema compliance across all responses
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits Realized
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **Reliability**
|
||||
- ✅ Eliminated JSON parsing failures
|
||||
- ✅ Guaranteed structured output from AI providers
|
||||
- ✅ Consistent error handling across all commands
|
||||
- ✅ Type-safe object access with schema validation
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Performance**
|
||||
- ✅ Removed client-side JSON parsing overhead
|
||||
- ✅ Eliminated retry logic for parsing failures
|
||||
- ✅ Reduced token usage by ~10-15% (no JSON formatting instructions)
|
||||
- ✅ Faster command execution times
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Maintainability**
|
||||
- ✅ Schema-driven development approach
|
||||
- ✅ Clear separation of concerns
|
||||
- ✅ Better IDE support with type inference
|
||||
- ✅ Easier debugging with structured errors
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **Developer Experience**
|
||||
- ✅ Direct object access: `aiServiceResponse.mainResult.property`
|
||||
- ✅ No more regex patterns or string manipulations
|
||||
- ✅ Clear schema documentation
|
||||
- ✅ Consistent patterns across all commands
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Before Migration
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Complex parsing with multiple fallback strategies
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateTextService({...});
|
||||
const parsedData = parseDataFromText(aiServiceResponse.mainResult, ...);
|
||||
// 200+ lines of parsing logic with error handling
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### After Migration
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Direct structured output
|
||||
const aiServiceResponse = await generateObjectService({
|
||||
schema: COMMAND_SCHEMAS['command-name'],
|
||||
...
|
||||
});
|
||||
const data = aiServiceResponse.mainResult.property; // Direct access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Special Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands Not Migrated
|
||||
1. **update-subtask-by-id**: This command appends timestamped text blocks to subtask details. It's designed for incremental text additions rather than structured data updates, making generateText the appropriate choice.
|
||||
|
||||
### Hybrid Approach
|
||||
1. **update-task-by-id**: Uses generateObject for full task updates but maintains generateText for append mode, where plain text is added to existing details.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Tests
|
||||
- ✅ All migrated commands pass integration tests
|
||||
- ✅ Schema validation works correctly
|
||||
- ✅ Provider fallback behavior maintained
|
||||
- ✅ Performance benchmarks show improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration Verification
|
||||
- ✅ No legacy parsing functions remain in use
|
||||
- ✅ All prompts updated (except intentional plain-text commands)
|
||||
- ✅ Schema registry complete and functional
|
||||
- ✅ Direct object access patterns verified
|
||||
|
||||
## Rollback Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The migration is complete and stable. However, if rollback is needed:
|
||||
1. The git history preserves all original parsing functions
|
||||
2. Each command was migrated independently
|
||||
3. The unified AI service supports both patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Monitor Performance**: Track token usage and response times
|
||||
2. **Schema Evolution**: Update schemas as requirements change
|
||||
3. **Provider Support**: Ensure new providers support object generation
|
||||
4. **Documentation**: Keep schema documentation up-to-date
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
The migration from `generateText` to `generateObject` has been successfully completed, delivering all expected benefits:
|
||||
- **90%+ reduction** in parsing-related errors
|
||||
- **500+ lines** of complex parsing code eliminated
|
||||
- **15% reduction** in token usage
|
||||
- **Improved** developer experience and maintainability
|
||||
|
||||
The Task Master codebase is now more reliable, performant, and maintainable, with a clear schema-driven architecture for AI interactions.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user