feat(ui): add cancelled status and improve MCP resource docs

- Add cancelled status to UI module for marking tasks cancelled without deletion
- Improve MCP server resource documentation with implementation examples
- Update architecture.mdc with detailed resource management info
- Add comprehensive resource handling guide to mcp.mdc
- Update changeset to reflect new features and documentation
- Mark task 23.6 as cancelled (MCP SDK integration no longer needed)
- Complete task 23.12 (structured logging system)
This commit is contained in:
Eyal Toledano
2025-03-31 14:50:56 -04:00
parent 036a7bd2d3
commit 38a2805dd8
4 changed files with 20 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -1388,8 +1388,8 @@
2,
3
],
"details": "Implementation steps:\n1. Replace manual tool registration with ModelContextProtocol SDK methods.\n2. Use SDK utilities to simplify resource and template management.\n3. Ensure compatibility with FastMCP's transport mechanisms.\n4. Update server initialization to include SDK-based configurations.\n\nTesting approach:\n- Verify SDK integration with all MCP endpoints.\n- Test resource and template registration using SDK methods.\n- Validate compatibility with existing MCP clients.\n- Benchmark performance improvements from SDK integration.",
"status": "deferred",
"details": "Implementation steps:\n1. Replace manual tool registration with ModelContextProtocol SDK methods.\n2. Use SDK utilities to simplify resource and template management.\n3. Ensure compatibility with FastMCP's transport mechanisms.\n4. Update server initialization to include SDK-based configurations.\n\nTesting approach:\n- Verify SDK integration with all MCP endpoints.\n- Test resource and template registration using SDK methods.\n- Validate compatibility with existing MCP clients.\n- Benchmark performance improvements from SDK integration.\n\n<info added on 2025-03-31T18:49:14.439Z>\nThe subtask is being cancelled because FastMCP already serves as a higher-level abstraction over the Model Context Protocol SDK. Direct integration with the MCP SDK would be redundant and potentially counterproductive since:\n\n1. FastMCP already encapsulates the necessary SDK functionality for tool registration and resource handling\n2. The existing FastMCP abstractions provide a more streamlined developer experience\n3. Adding another layer of SDK integration would increase complexity without clear benefits\n4. The transport mechanisms in FastMCP are already optimized for the current architecture\n\nInstead, we should focus on extending and enhancing the existing FastMCP abstractions where needed, rather than attempting to bypass them with direct SDK integration.\n</info added on 2025-03-31T18:49:14.439Z>",
"status": "cancelled",
"parentTaskId": 23
},
{
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@
"title": "Implement Structured Logging System",
"description": "Implement a comprehensive logging system for the MCP server with different log levels, structured logging format, and request/response tracking.",
"details": "1. Design structured log format for consistent parsing\\n2. Implement different log levels (debug, info, warn, error)\\n3. Add request/response logging middleware\\n4. Implement correlation IDs for request tracking\\n5. Add performance metrics logging\\n6. Configure log output destinations (console, file)\\n7. Document logging patterns and usage",
"status": "deferred",
"status": "done",
"dependencies": [
"23.1",
"23.3"