feat: add claude-code-setup and claude-md-management plugins

plugins/claude-md-management/skills/claude-md-improver/references/quality-criteria.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# CLAUDE.md Quality Criteria
+
+## Scoring Rubric
+
+### 1. Commands/Workflows (20 points)
+
+**20 points**: All essential commands documented with context
+- Build, test, lint, deploy commands present
+- Development workflow clear
+- Common operations documented
+
+**15 points**: Most commands present, some missing context
+
+**10 points**: Basic commands only, no workflow
+
+**5 points**: Few commands, many missing
+
+**0 points**: No commands documented
+
+### 2. Architecture Clarity (20 points)
+
+**20 points**: Clear codebase map
+- Key directories explained
+- Module relationships documented
+- Entry points identified
+- Data flow described where relevant
+
+**15 points**: Good structure overview, minor gaps
+
+**10 points**: Basic directory listing only
+
+**5 points**: Vague or incomplete
+
+**0 points**: No architecture info
+
+### 3. Non-Obvious Patterns (15 points)
+
+**15 points**: Gotchas and quirks captured
+- Known issues documented
+- Workarounds explained
+- Edge cases noted
+- "Why we do it this way" for unusual patterns
+
+**10 points**: Some patterns documented
+
+**5 points**: Minimal pattern documentation
+
+**0 points**: No patterns or gotchas
+
+### 4. Conciseness (15 points)
+
+**15 points**: Dense, valuable content
+- No filler or obvious info
+- Each line adds value
+- No redundancy with code comments
+
+**10 points**: Mostly concise, some padding
+
+**5 points**: Verbose in places
+
+**0 points**: Mostly filler or restates obvious code
+
+### 5. Currency (15 points)
+
+**15 points**: Reflects current codebase
+- Commands work as documented
+- File references accurate
+- Tech stack current
+
+**10 points**: Mostly current, minor staleness
+
+**5 points**: Several outdated references
+
+**0 points**: Severely outdated
+
+### 6. Actionability (15 points)
+
+**15 points**: Instructions are executable
+- Commands can be copy-pasted
+- Steps are concrete
+- Paths are real
+
+**10 points**: Mostly actionable
+
+**5 points**: Some vague instructions
+
+**0 points**: Vague or theoretical
+
+## Assessment Process
+
+1. Read the CLAUDE.md file completely
+2. Cross-reference with actual codebase:
+   - Run documented commands (mentally or actually)
+   - Check if referenced files exist
+   - Verify architecture descriptions
+3. Score each criterion
+4. Calculate total and assign grade
+5. List specific issues found
+6. Propose concrete improvements
+
+## Red Flags
+
+- Commands that would fail (wrong paths, missing deps)
+- References to deleted files/folders
+- Outdated tech versions
+- Copy-paste from templates without customization
+- Generic advice not specific to the project
+- "TODO" items never completed
+- Duplicate info across multiple CLAUDE.md files