--- description: Create a new feature with requirements and implementation plan --- # Create Feature This command creates a new feature specification folder with requirements and implementation plan documents. ## Instructions ### Given the above conversation: 1. **Create feature folder** - Store the requirements and implementation plan in `/specs` - Create a new subfolder for this feature using kebab-case (e.g., `add-auth`) 2. **Create requirements.md** - Document what the feature does and why - Include acceptance criteria - Reference any related features or dependencies 3. **Create implementation-plan.md** - Split the implementation into phases - Create actionable tasks for each phase - Each task should have a checkbox: `[ ] Task description` - Tasks should be specific enough for an agent to implement independently - Include dependencies between tasks where relevant - Mark complex tasks with `[complex]` suffix (these will get their own GitHub issue when published) 4. **Create action-required.md** - Extract all manual steps that require human action - Include tasks like: account creation, API key setup, environment variables, third-party service configuration, DNS settings, etc. - Each task has a checkbox and brief context (one-liner explaining why it's needed) - Keep these tasks in the implementation plan as well (for full context) - If no manual steps exist, create the file with a "None required" note 5. **Exclude testing tasks** - Do NOT include unit or e2e testing tasks - UNLESS the user explicitly asks for testing to be included ### If no conversation exists: Ask the user what the requirements are first, then create the spec subfolder with: - `requirements.md` - `implementation-plan.md` - `action-required.md` ## Implementation Plan Format Use this structure for `implementation-plan.md`: ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Feature Name} ## Overview Brief summary of what will be built. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} {Brief description of this phase's goal} ### Tasks - [ ] Task 1 description - [ ] Task 2 description (depends on Task 1) - [ ] Task 3 description [complex] - [ ] Sub-task 3a - [ ] Sub-task 3b ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} {Brief description} ### Tasks - [ ] Task 4 description (depends on Phase 1) - [ ] Task 5 description ... ``` **Note:** Tasks marked with `[complex]` or containing nested sub-tasks will be created as separate GitHub issues when published (linked to their parent phase issue). ## action-required.md Format Use this structure for `action-required.md`: ```markdown # Action Required: {Feature Name} Manual steps that must be completed by a human. These cannot be automated. ## Before Implementation - [ ] **{Action}** - {Brief reason why this is needed} ## During Implementation - [ ] **{Action}** - {Brief reason} ## After Implementation - [ ] **{Action}** - {Brief reason} --- > **Note:** These tasks are also listed in context within `implementation-plan.md` ``` ### When No Manual Steps Exist If the feature has no manual steps, create the file with: ```markdown # Action Required: {Feature Name} No manual steps required for this feature. All tasks can be implemented automatically. ``` ## Next Steps After creating the feature, inform the user: > Feature specification created at `specs/{feature-name}/` > > **Next steps:** > > 1. Review `action-required.md` for tasks you need to complete manually > 2. Review the requirements and implementation plan > 3. Run `/publish-to-github` to create GitHub issues and project > 4. Use `/continue-feature` to start implementing ## Notes - Keep tasks atomic - each should be implementable in a single session - Tasks should produce working, testable code when complete - Use clear, descriptive task names that explain what will be done - Note dependencies explicitly when tasks must be done in order - Common manual tasks: account creation, API key generation, environment variables, OAuth app configuration, DNS/domain setup, billing setup, third-party service registration ### When to Use `[complex]` Mark a task with `[complex]` when it: - Has multiple sub-tasks that need individual tracking - Requires significant architectural decisions or discussion - Spans multiple files or systems - Would benefit from its own GitHub issue for comments/review Most tasks should NOT be marked complex - reserve this for genuinely substantial work items.