chore: cleaned up bad architecture file calls, legacy doc references, and case sensitivity issues to remove ambiguity (#718)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ Sub-step 6.2: Fill Template Placeholders
|
||||
- Ask user for any missing information
|
||||
- Generate appropriate content based on user_skill_level
|
||||
|
||||
8. Generate final architecture.md document
|
||||
8. Generate final solution-architecture.md document
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
||||
- MUST include "Technology and Library Decisions" section with table:
|
||||
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ Run cohesion check validation inline (NO separate workflow for now):
|
||||
5. Generate Epic Alignment Matrix:
|
||||
| Epic | Stories | Components | Data Models | APIs | Integration Points | Status |
|
||||
|
||||
This matrix is SEPARATE OUTPUT (not in architecture.md)
|
||||
This matrix is SEPARATE OUTPUT (not in solution-architecture.md)
|
||||
|
||||
6. Generate Cohesion Check Report with:
|
||||
- Executive summary (READY vs GAPS)
|
||||
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ Issues found:
|
||||
{{list_critical_issues}}
|
||||
|
||||
Options:
|
||||
1. I'll fix these issues now (update architecture.md)
|
||||
1. I'll fix these issues now (update solution-architecture.md)
|
||||
2. You'll fix them manually
|
||||
3. Proceed anyway (not recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ Proceed? (y/n)
|
||||
</ask>
|
||||
|
||||
<action if="user_chooses_option_1">
|
||||
Update architecture.md to address critical issues, then re-validate.
|
||||
Update solution-architecture.md to address critical issues, then re-validate.
|
||||
</action>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ Testing Assessment:
|
||||
- Simple: Basic unit + E2E → Handle INLINE
|
||||
- Complex: Mission-critical UI, comprehensive coverage needed → Create PLACEHOLDER
|
||||
|
||||
For INLINE: Add 1-3 paragraph sections to architecture.md
|
||||
For INLINE: Add 1-3 paragraph sections to solution-architecture.md
|
||||
For PLACEHOLDER: Add handoff section with specialist agent invocation instructions
|
||||
</action>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ I'll handle {{specialist_area}} inline with essentials.
|
||||
</ask>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>
|
||||
Update architecture.md with specialist sections (inline or placeholders) at the END of document.
|
||||
Update solution-architecture.md with specialist sections (inline or placeholders) at the END of document.
|
||||
</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>specialist_sections</template-output>
|
||||
@@ -598,12 +598,12 @@ For polyrepo projects:
|
||||
Example: frontend-repo, api-repo, worker-repo, mobile-repo
|
||||
|
||||
2. Strategy: Copy FULL documentation to ALL repos
|
||||
- architecture.md → Copy to each repo
|
||||
- solution-architecture.md → Copy to each repo
|
||||
- tech-spec-epic-X.md → Copy to each repo (full set)
|
||||
- cohesion-check-report.md → Copy to each repo
|
||||
|
||||
3. Add repo-specific README pointing to docs:
|
||||
"See /docs/architecture.md for complete solution architecture"
|
||||
"See /docs/solution-architecture.md for complete solution architecture"
|
||||
|
||||
4. Later phases extract per-epic and per-story contexts as needed
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ For monorepo projects:
|
||||
<action>
|
||||
Final validation checklist:
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] architecture.md exists and is complete
|
||||
- [x] solution-architecture.md exists and is complete
|
||||
- [x] Technology and Library Decision Table has specific versions
|
||||
- [x] Proposed Source Tree section included
|
||||
- [x] Cohesion check passed (or issues addressed)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user