feat: migrate test architect entirely to v6
This commit is contained in:
375
src/modules/bmm/workflows/testarch/trace/README.md
Normal file
375
src/modules/bmm/workflows/testarch/trace/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@
|
||||
# Requirements Traceability Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow ID:** `testarch-trace`
|
||||
**Agent:** Test Architect (TEA)
|
||||
**Command:** `bmad tea *trace`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
The **trace** workflow generates a comprehensive requirements-to-tests traceability matrix that maps acceptance criteria to implemented tests, identifies coverage gaps, and provides actionable recommendations for improving test coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Maps acceptance criteria to specific test cases across all levels (E2E, API, Component, Unit)
|
||||
- Classifies coverage status (FULL, PARTIAL, NONE, UNIT-ONLY, INTEGRATION-ONLY)
|
||||
- Prioritizes gaps by risk level (P0/P1/P2/P3)
|
||||
- Generates CI/CD-ready YAML snippets for quality gates
|
||||
- Detects duplicate coverage across test levels
|
||||
- Verifies test quality (assertions, structure, performance)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use This Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
Use `*trace` when you need to:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Validate that all acceptance criteria have test coverage
|
||||
- ✅ Identify coverage gaps before release or PR merge
|
||||
- ✅ Generate traceability documentation for compliance or audits
|
||||
- ✅ Ensure critical paths (P0/P1) are fully tested
|
||||
- ✅ Detect duplicate coverage across test levels
|
||||
- ✅ Assess test quality across your suite
|
||||
- ✅ Create gate-ready metrics for CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
**Typical Timing:**
|
||||
|
||||
- After tests are implemented (post-ATDD or post-development)
|
||||
- Before merging a PR (validate P0/P1 coverage)
|
||||
- Before release (validate full coverage)
|
||||
- During sprint retrospectives (assess test quality)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
**Required:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria (from story file OR inline)
|
||||
- Implemented test suite (or acknowledged gaps)
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `test-design.md` - Risk assessment and test priorities
|
||||
- `tech-spec.md` - Technical implementation details
|
||||
- Test framework configuration (playwright.config.ts, jest.config.js)
|
||||
|
||||
**Halt Conditions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Story lacks any tests AND gaps are not acknowledged → Run `*atdd` first
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria are completely missing → Provide criteria or story file
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
### Basic Usage (BMad Mode)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bmad tea *trace
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read story file from `bmad/output/story-X.X.md`
|
||||
2. Extract acceptance criteria
|
||||
3. Auto-discover tests for this story
|
||||
4. Generate traceability matrix
|
||||
5. Save to `bmad/output/traceability-matrix.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Standalone Mode (No Story File)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bmad tea *trace --acceptance-criteria "AC-1: User can login with email..."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bmad tea *trace \
|
||||
--story-file "bmad/output/story-1.3.md" \
|
||||
--output-file "docs/qa/trace-1.3.md" \
|
||||
--min-p0-coverage 100 \
|
||||
--min-p1-coverage 90
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Load Context** - Read story, test design, tech spec, knowledge base
|
||||
2. **Discover Tests** - Auto-find tests related to story (by ID, describe blocks, file paths)
|
||||
3. **Map Criteria** - Link acceptance criteria to specific test cases
|
||||
4. **Analyze Gaps** - Identify missing coverage and prioritize by risk
|
||||
5. **Verify Quality** - Check test quality (assertions, structure, performance)
|
||||
6. **Generate Deliverables** - Create traceability matrix, gate YAML, coverage badge
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Traceability Matrix (`traceability-matrix.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive markdown file with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Coverage summary table (by priority)
|
||||
- Detailed criterion-to-test mapping
|
||||
- Gap analysis with recommendations
|
||||
- Quality assessment for each test
|
||||
- Gate YAML snippet
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate YAML Snippet
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
traceability:
|
||||
story_id: '1.3'
|
||||
coverage:
|
||||
overall: 85%
|
||||
p0: 100%
|
||||
p1: 90%
|
||||
gaps:
|
||||
critical: 0
|
||||
high: 1
|
||||
status: 'PASS'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Updated Story File (Optional)
|
||||
|
||||
Adds "Traceability" section to story markdown with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Link to traceability matrix
|
||||
- Coverage summary
|
||||
- Gate status
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Coverage Classifications
|
||||
|
||||
- **FULL** ✅ - All scenarios validated at appropriate level(s)
|
||||
- **PARTIAL** ⚠️ - Some coverage but missing edge cases or levels
|
||||
- **NONE** ❌ - No test coverage at any level
|
||||
- **UNIT-ONLY** ⚠️ - Only unit tests (missing integration/E2E validation)
|
||||
- **INTEGRATION-ONLY** ⚠️ - Only API/Component tests (missing unit confidence)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gates
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Coverage Requirement | Severity | Action |
|
||||
| -------- | -------------------- | -------- | ------------------ |
|
||||
| P0 | 100% | BLOCKER | Do not release |
|
||||
| P1 | 90% | HIGH | Block PR merge |
|
||||
| P2 | 80% (recommended) | MEDIUM | Address in nightly |
|
||||
| P3 | No requirement | LOW | Optional |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### workflow.yaml Variables
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
variables:
|
||||
# Target specification
|
||||
story_file: '' # Path to story markdown
|
||||
acceptance_criteria: '' # Inline criteria if no story
|
||||
|
||||
# Test discovery
|
||||
test_dir: '{project-root}/tests'
|
||||
auto_discover_tests: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Traceability configuration
|
||||
coverage_levels: 'e2e,api,component,unit'
|
||||
map_by_test_id: true
|
||||
map_by_describe: true
|
||||
map_by_filename: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Gap analysis
|
||||
prioritize_by_risk: true
|
||||
suggest_missing_tests: true
|
||||
check_duplicate_coverage: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Output configuration
|
||||
output_file: '{output_folder}/traceability-matrix.md'
|
||||
generate_gate_yaml: true
|
||||
generate_coverage_badge: true
|
||||
update_story_file: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Quality gates
|
||||
min_p0_coverage: 100
|
||||
min_p1_coverage: 90
|
||||
min_overall_coverage: 80
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Knowledge Base Integration
|
||||
|
||||
This workflow automatically loads relevant knowledge fragments:
|
||||
|
||||
- `traceability.md` - Requirements mapping patterns
|
||||
- `test-priorities.md` - P0/P1/P2/P3 risk framework
|
||||
- `risk-governance.md` - Risk-based testing approach
|
||||
- `test-quality.md` - Definition of Done for tests
|
||||
- `selective-testing.md` - Duplicate coverage patterns
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Full Coverage Validation
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Validate P0/P1 coverage before PR merge
|
||||
bmad tea *trace --story-file "bmad/output/story-1.3.md"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Traceability Matrix - Story 1.3
|
||||
|
||||
## Coverage Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Total | FULL | Coverage % | Status |
|
||||
| -------- | ----- | ---- | ---------- | ------- |
|
||||
| P0 | 3 | 3 | 100% | ✅ PASS |
|
||||
| P1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | ✅ PASS |
|
||||
|
||||
Gate Status: PASS ✅
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: Gap Identification
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find coverage gaps for existing feature
|
||||
bmad tea *trace --target-feature "user-authentication"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Gap Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Gaps (BLOCKER)
|
||||
|
||||
- None ✅
|
||||
|
||||
### High Priority Gaps (PR BLOCKER)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **AC-3: Password reset email edge cases**
|
||||
- Recommend: Add 1.3-API-001 (email service integration)
|
||||
- Impact: Users may not recover accounts in error scenarios
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Duplicate Coverage Detection
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check for redundant tests
|
||||
bmad tea *trace --check-duplicate-coverage true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Duplicate Coverage Detected
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ AC-1 (login validation) is tested at multiple levels:
|
||||
|
||||
- 1.3-E2E-001 (full user journey) ✅ Appropriate
|
||||
- 1.3-UNIT-001 (business logic) ✅ Appropriate
|
||||
- 1.3-COMPONENT-001 (form validation) ⚠️ Redundant with UNIT-001
|
||||
|
||||
Recommendation: Remove 1.3-COMPONENT-001 or consolidate with UNIT-001
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### "No tests found for this story"
|
||||
|
||||
- Run `*atdd` workflow first to generate failing acceptance tests
|
||||
- Check test file naming conventions (may not match story ID pattern)
|
||||
- Verify test directory path is correct (`test_dir` variable)
|
||||
|
||||
### "Cannot determine coverage status"
|
||||
|
||||
- Tests may lack explicit mapping (no test IDs, unclear describe blocks)
|
||||
- Add test IDs: `{STORY_ID}-{LEVEL}-{SEQ}` (e.g., `1.3-E2E-001`)
|
||||
- Use Given-When-Then narrative in test descriptions
|
||||
|
||||
### "P0 coverage below 100%"
|
||||
|
||||
- This is a **BLOCKER** - do not release
|
||||
- Identify missing P0 tests in gap analysis
|
||||
- Run `*atdd` workflow to generate missing tests
|
||||
- Verify P0 classification is correct with stakeholders
|
||||
|
||||
### "Duplicate coverage detected"
|
||||
|
||||
- Review `selective-testing.md` knowledge fragment
|
||||
- Determine if overlap is acceptable (defense in depth) or wasteful
|
||||
- Consolidate tests at appropriate level (logic → unit, journey → E2E)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Other Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
- **testarch-test-design** → `*trace` - Define priorities, then trace coverage
|
||||
- **testarch-atdd** → `*trace` - Generate tests, then validate coverage
|
||||
- `*trace` → **testarch-automate** - Identify gaps, then automate regression
|
||||
- `*trace` → **testarch-gate** - Generate metrics, then apply quality gates
|
||||
- `*trace` → **testarch-test-review** - Flag quality issues, then review tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Run Trace After Test Implementation**
|
||||
- Don't run `*trace` before tests exist (run `*atdd` first)
|
||||
- Trace is most valuable after initial test suite is written
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Prioritize by Risk**
|
||||
- P0 gaps are BLOCKERS (must fix before release)
|
||||
- P1 gaps are HIGH priority (block PR merge)
|
||||
- P3 gaps are acceptable (fix if time permits)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Explicit Mapping**
|
||||
- Use test IDs (`1.3-E2E-001`) for clear traceability
|
||||
- Reference criteria in describe blocks
|
||||
- Use Given-When-Then narrative
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Avoid Duplicate Coverage**
|
||||
- Test each behavior at appropriate level only
|
||||
- Unit tests for logic, E2E for journeys
|
||||
- Only overlap for defense in depth on critical paths
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Generate Gate-Ready Artifacts**
|
||||
- Enable `generate_gate_yaml` for CI/CD integration
|
||||
- Use YAML snippets in pipeline quality gates
|
||||
- Export metrics for dashboard visualization
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `bmad tea *test-design` - Define test priorities and risk assessment
|
||||
- `bmad tea *atdd` - Generate failing acceptance tests for gaps
|
||||
- `bmad tea *automate` - Expand regression suite based on gaps
|
||||
- `bmad tea *gate` - Apply quality gates using traceability metrics
|
||||
- `bmad tea *test-review` - Review test quality issues flagged by trace
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resources
|
||||
|
||||
- [Instructions](./instructions.md) - Detailed workflow steps
|
||||
- [Checklist](./checklist.md) - Validation checklist
|
||||
- [Template](./trace-template.md) - Traceability matrix template
|
||||
- [Knowledge Base](../../testarch/knowledge/) - Testing best practices
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Powered by BMAD-CORE™ -->
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user