specify md ot yaml
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
@@ -50,19 +50,17 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Business Analyst, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl
|
||||
- brainstorming-output-tmpl
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
@@ -47,19 +47,17 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Architect, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- document-project.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- architect-checklist
|
||||
- architect-checklist.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML to understand your operating params, start activati
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
@@ -59,55 +59,54 @@ execution:
|
||||
- Suggest related resources after completion
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-doc2
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan
|
||||
- document-project
|
||||
- create-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt
|
||||
- index-docs
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation.md
|
||||
- facilitate-brainstorming-session.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan.md
|
||||
- document-project.md
|
||||
- create-next-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- generate-ai-frontend-prompt.md
|
||||
- index-docs.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl2
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- market-research-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- project-brief-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
- bmad-kb.md
|
||||
- brainstorming-techniques.md
|
||||
- elicitation-methods.md
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- plan-management
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- workflow-management
|
||||
- plan-management.md
|
||||
- template-format.md
|
||||
- workflow-management.md
|
||||
workflows:
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack
|
||||
- brownfield-service
|
||||
- brownfield-ui
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack
|
||||
- greenfield-service
|
||||
- greenfield-ui
|
||||
- brownfield-fullstack.md
|
||||
- brownfield-service.md
|
||||
- brownfield-ui.md
|
||||
- greenfield-fullstack.md
|
||||
- greenfield-service.md
|
||||
- greenfield-ui.md
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- architect-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
- pm-checklist
|
||||
- po-master-checklist
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist
|
||||
- architect-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
- pm-checklist.md
|
||||
- po-master-checklist.md
|
||||
- story-dod-checklist.md
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML to understand your operating params, start activati
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Announce: Introduce yourself as the BMad Orchestrator, explain you can coordinate agents and workflows
|
||||
- IMPORTANT: Tell users that all commands start with * (e.g., *help, *agent, *workflow)
|
||||
@@ -126,15 +126,16 @@ workflow-guidance:
|
||||
- When *workflow-guidance is called, start an interactive session and list all available workflows with brief descriptions
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan
|
||||
- kb-mode-interaction
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan
|
||||
- advanced-elicitation.md
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- create-workflow-plan.md
|
||||
- kb-mode-interaction.md
|
||||
- update-workflow-plan.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- bmad-kb
|
||||
- bmad-kb.md
|
||||
- elicitation-methods.md
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- plan-management
|
||||
- workflow-management
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- plan-management.md
|
||||
- workflow-management.md
|
||||
- template-format.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Announce: Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Read the following full files as these are your explicit rules for development standards for this project - {root}/core-config.yaml devLoadAlwaysFiles list
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
@@ -42,21 +42,19 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-doc
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- create-doc.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- create-deep-research-prompt.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- prd-tmpl
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl
|
||||
- prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
- brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- pm-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
- pm-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
@@ -50,17 +50,15 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Exit (confirm)
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- shard-doc
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story
|
||||
- validate-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- shard-doc.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-epic.md
|
||||
- brownfield-create-story.md
|
||||
- validate-next-story.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- po-master-checklist
|
||||
- change-checklist
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- po-master-checklist.md
|
||||
- change-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- Only read the files/tasks listed here when user selects them for execution to minimize context usage
|
||||
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the QA Engineer, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- review-story
|
||||
- review-story.md
|
||||
data:
|
||||
- technical-preferences
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- technical-preferences.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ CRITICAL: Read the full YAML, start activation to alter your state of being, fol
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
root: .bmad-core
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name}.md where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.md), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION: Dependencies map to files as {root}/{type}/{name} where root=".bmad-core", type=folder (tasks/templates/checklists/utils), name=dependency name.
|
||||
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "draft story"→*create→create-next-story task, "make a new prd" would be dependencies->tasks->create-doc combined with the dependencies->templates->prd-tmpl.yaml), or ask for clarification if ambiguous.
|
||||
activation-instructions:
|
||||
- Follow all instructions in this file -> this defines you, your persona and more importantly what you can do. STAY IN CHARACTER!
|
||||
- The customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
|
||||
@@ -36,13 +36,11 @@ commands:
|
||||
- exit: Say goodbye as the Scrum Master, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
|
||||
dependencies:
|
||||
tasks:
|
||||
- create-next-story
|
||||
- execute-checklist
|
||||
- correct-course
|
||||
- create-next-story.md
|
||||
- execute-checklist.md
|
||||
- correct-course.md
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- story-tmpl
|
||||
- story-tmpl.yaml
|
||||
checklists:
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist
|
||||
utils:
|
||||
- template-format
|
||||
- story-draft-checklist.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,776 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. If at a minimum you cannot local `docs/prd.md` ask the user what docs will provide the basis for the architecture.]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section establishes the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the overall project architecture for {{Project Name}}, including backend systems, shared services, and non-UI specific concerns. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency and adherence to chosen patterns and technologies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Frontend Architecture:**
|
||||
If the project includes a significant user interface, a separate Frontend Architecture Document will detail the frontend-specific design and MUST be used in conjunction with this document. Core technology stack choices documented herein (see "Tech Stack") are definitive for the entire project, including any frontend components.
|
||||
|
||||
### Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before proceeding further with architecture design, check if the project is based on a starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and brainstorming brief for any mentions of:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- Existing projects or codebases being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Boilerplate projects or scaffolding tools
|
||||
- Previous projects to be cloned or adapted
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.)
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-configured technology stack and versions
|
||||
- Project structure and organization patterns
|
||||
- Built-in scripts and tooling
|
||||
- Existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Any limitations or constraints imposed by the starter
|
||||
- Use this analysis to inform and align your architecture decisions
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter template is mentioned but this is a greenfield project:
|
||||
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate starter templates based on the tech stack preferences
|
||||
- Explain the benefits (faster setup, best practices, community support)
|
||||
- Let the user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
|
||||
- Proceed with architecture design from scratch
|
||||
- Note that manual setup will be required for all tooling and configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Document the decision here before proceeding with the architecture design. In none, just say N/A
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this starter template section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## High Level Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation of the architecture. Present all subsections together (Introduction, Technical Summary, High Level Overview, Project Diagram, and Architectural Patterns), then apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol to the complete High Level Architecture section. The user can choose to refine the entire section or specific subsections.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a brief paragraph (3-5 sentences) overview of:
|
||||
|
||||
- The system's overall architecture style
|
||||
- Key components and their relationships
|
||||
- Primary technology choices
|
||||
- Core architectural patterns being used
|
||||
- Reference back to the PRD goals and how this architecture supports them]]
|
||||
|
||||
### High Level Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the PRD's Technical Assumptions section, describe:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The main architectural style (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless, Event-Driven)
|
||||
2. Repository structure decision from PRD (Monorepo/Polyrepo)
|
||||
3. Service architecture decision from PRD
|
||||
4. Primary user interaction flow or data flow at a conceptual level
|
||||
5. Key architectural decisions and their rationale
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### High Level Project Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a Mermaid diagram that visualizes the high-level architecture. Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- System boundaries
|
||||
- Major components/services
|
||||
- Data flow directions
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- User entry points
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate Mermaid diagram type (graph TD, C4, sequence) based on what best represents the architecture
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the diagram, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Architectural and Design Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List the key high-level patterns that will guide the architecture. For each pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present 2-3 viable options if multiple exist
|
||||
2. Provide your recommendation with clear rationale
|
||||
3. Get user confirmation before finalizing
|
||||
4. These patterns should align with the PRD's technical assumptions and project goals
|
||||
|
||||
Common patterns to consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- Architectural style patterns (Serverless, Event-Driven, Microservices, CQRS, Hexagonal)
|
||||
- Code organization patterns (Dependency Injection, Repository, Module, Factory)
|
||||
- Data patterns (Event Sourcing, Saga, Database per Service)
|
||||
- Communication patterns (REST, GraphQL, Message Queue, Pub/Sub)]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: pattern>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: patterns}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Serverless Architecture:** Using AWS Lambda for compute - _Rationale:_ Aligns with PRD requirement for cost optimization and automatic scaling
|
||||
- **Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility
|
||||
- **Event-Driven Communication:** Using SNS/SQS for service decoupling - _Rationale:_ Supports async processing and system resilience
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the patterns, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Tech Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection section. Work with the user to make specific choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD technical assumptions and any preferences from `{root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml` or an attached `technical-preferences`
|
||||
2. For each category, present 2-3 viable options with pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a clear recommendation based on project needs
|
||||
4. Get explicit user approval for each selection
|
||||
5. Document exact versions (avoid "latest" - pin specific versions)
|
||||
6. This table is the single source of truth - all other docs must reference these choices
|
||||
|
||||
Key decisions to finalize - before displaying the table, ensure you are aware of or ask the user about - let the user know if they are not sure on any that you can also provide suggestions with rationale:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (if any)
|
||||
- Languages and runtimes with exact versions
|
||||
- Frameworks and libraries / packages
|
||||
- Cloud provider and key services choices
|
||||
- Database and storage solutions - if unclear suggest sql or nosql or other types depending on the project and depending on cloud provider offer a suggestion
|
||||
- Development tools
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render of the table, ensure the user is aware of the importance of this sections choices, should also look for gaps or disagreements with anything, ask for any clarifications if something is unclear why its in the list, and also right away apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` display - this statement and the options should be rendered and then prompt right all before allowing user input.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Cloud Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
- **Provider:** {{cloud_provider}}
|
||||
- **Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Stack Table
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale |
|
||||
| :----------------- | :----------------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------- |
|
||||
| **Language** | {{language}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | {{runtime}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Database** | {{database}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Cache** | {{cache}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Message Queue** | {{queue}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **API Style** | {{api_style}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Authentication** | {{auth}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **IaC Tool** | {{iac_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Monitoring** | {{monitoring}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Logging** | {{logging}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: tech_stack_row}
|
||||
| **Language** | TypeScript | 5.3.3 | Primary development language | Strong typing, excellent tooling, team expertise |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | Node.js | 20.11.0 | JavaScript runtime | LTS version, stable performance, wide ecosystem |
|
||||
| **Framework** | NestJS | 10.3.2 | Backend framework | Enterprise-ready, good DI, matches team patterns |
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Models
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the core data models/entities:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting all data models, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: data_model>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{model_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{relationship_1}}
|
||||
- {{relationship_2}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services and their responsibilities
|
||||
2. Consider the repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo) from PRD
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
6. After presenting all components, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: component>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the diagrams, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## External APIs
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: external_api>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{api_name}} API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
<<REPEAT: endpoint>>
|
||||
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: external_api}
|
||||
|
||||
### Stripe API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** Payment processing and subscription management
|
||||
- **Documentation:** https://stripe.com/docs/api
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** `https://api.stripe.com/v1`
|
||||
- **Authentication:** Bearer token with secret key
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** 100 requests per second
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `POST /customers` - Create customer profiles
|
||||
- `POST /payment_intents` - Process payments
|
||||
- `POST /subscriptions` - Manage subscriptions
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting external APIs (or noting their absence), apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include error handling paths
|
||||
4. Document async operations
|
||||
5. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the workflow diagrams, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## REST API Spec
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If the project includes a REST API:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
3. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
4. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
5. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use YAML format for better readability. If no REST API, skip this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_rest_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
version:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
description:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
description:
|
||||
'[object Object]': null
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_rest_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the REST API spec (or noting its absence if not applicable), apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Database Schema
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the database schema, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Source Tree
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a project folder structure that reflects:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The chosen repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo)
|
||||
2. The service architecture (monolith/microservices/serverless)
|
||||
3. The selected tech stack and languages
|
||||
4. Component organization from above
|
||||
5. Best practices for the chosen frameworks
|
||||
6. Clear separation of concerns
|
||||
|
||||
Adapt the structure based on project needs. For monorepos, show service separation. For serverless, show function organization. Include language-specific conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting the structure, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol to refine based on user feedback.]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── .github/ # CI/CD workflows
|
||||
│ └── workflows/
|
||||
│ └── main.yaml
|
||||
├── .vscode/ # VSCode settings (optional)
|
||||
│ └── settings.json
|
||||
├── build/ # Compiled output (git-ignored)
|
||||
├── config/ # Configuration files
|
||||
├── docs/ # Project documentation
|
||||
│ ├── PRD.md
|
||||
│ ├── architecture.md
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── infra/ # Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
│ └── {{iac-structure}}
|
||||
├── {{dependencies-dir}}/ # Dependencies (git-ignored)
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Utility scripts
|
||||
├── src/ # Application source code
|
||||
│ └── {{source-structure}}
|
||||
├── tests/ # Test files
|
||||
│ ├── unit/
|
||||
│ ├── integration/
|
||||
│ └── e2e/
|
||||
├── .env.example # Environment variables template
|
||||
├── .gitignore # Git ignore rules
|
||||
├── {{package-manifest}} # Dependencies manifest
|
||||
├── {{config-files}} # Language/framework configs
|
||||
└── README.md # Project documentation
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: monorepo-structure}
|
||||
project-root/
|
||||
├── packages/
|
||||
│ ├── api/ # Backend API service
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared utilities/types
|
||||
│ └── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Monorepo management scripts
|
||||
└── package.json # Root package.json with workspaces
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the source tree structure, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure and Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the deployment architecture and practices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use IaC tool selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Choose deployment strategy appropriate for the architecture
|
||||
3. Define environments and promotion flow
|
||||
4. Establish rollback procedures
|
||||
5. Consider security, monitoring, and cost optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Get user input on deployment preferences and CI/CD tool choices.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
|
||||
- **Tool:** {{iac_tool}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Location:** `{{iac_directory}}`
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{iac_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
- **CI/CD Platform:** {{cicd_platform}}
|
||||
- **Pipeline Configuration:** `{{pipeline_config_location}}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Environments
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: environment>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{env_name}}:** {{env_purpose}} - {{env_details}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Promotion Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
{{promotion_flow_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Rollback Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
- **Trigger Conditions:** {{rollback_triggers}}
|
||||
- **Recovery Time Objective:** {{rto}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the infrastructure and deployment section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define comprehensive error handling approach:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Choose appropriate patterns for the language/framework from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Define logging standards and tools
|
||||
3. Establish error categories and handling rules
|
||||
4. Consider observability and debugging needs
|
||||
5. Ensure security (no sensitive data in logs)
|
||||
|
||||
This section guides both AI and human developers in consistent error handling.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### General Approach
|
||||
|
||||
- **Error Model:** {{error_model}}
|
||||
- **Exception Hierarchy:** {{exception_structure}}
|
||||
- **Error Propagation:** {{propagation_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Logging Standards
|
||||
|
||||
- **Library:** {{logging_library}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Format:** {{log_format}}
|
||||
- **Levels:** {{log_levels_definition}}
|
||||
- **Required Context:**
|
||||
- Correlation ID: {{correlation_id_format}}
|
||||
- Service Context: {{service_context}}
|
||||
- User Context: {{user_context_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
#### External API Errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **Retry Policy:** {{retry_strategy}}
|
||||
- **Circuit Breaker:** {{circuit_breaker_config}}
|
||||
- **Timeout Configuration:** {{timeout_settings}}
|
||||
- **Error Translation:** {{error_mapping_rules}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Business Logic Errors
|
||||
|
||||
- **Custom Exceptions:** {{business_exception_types}}
|
||||
- **User-Facing Errors:** {{user_error_format}}
|
||||
- **Error Codes:** {{error_code_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Data Consistency
|
||||
|
||||
- **Transaction Strategy:** {{transaction_approach}}
|
||||
- **Compensation Logic:** {{compensation_patterns}}
|
||||
- **Idempotency:** {{idempotency_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the error handling strategy, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Coding Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: These standards are MANDATORY for AI agents. Work with user to define ONLY the critical rules needed to prevent bad code. Explain that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This section directly controls AI developer behavior
|
||||
2. Keep it minimal - assume AI knows general best practices
|
||||
3. Focus on project-specific conventions and gotchas
|
||||
4. Overly detailed standards bloat context and slow development
|
||||
5. Standards will be extracted to separate file for dev agent use
|
||||
|
||||
For each standard, get explicit user confirmation it's necessary.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Standards
|
||||
|
||||
- **Languages & Runtimes:** {{languages_and_versions}}
|
||||
- **Style & Linting:** {{linter_config}}
|
||||
- **Test Organization:** {{test_file_convention}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if deviating from language defaults]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Element | Convention | Example |
|
||||
| :-------- | :------------------- | :---------------- |
|
||||
| Variables | {{var_convention}} | {{var_example}} |
|
||||
| Functions | {{func_convention}} | {{func_example}} |
|
||||
| Classes | {{class_convention}} | {{class_example}} |
|
||||
| Files | {{file_convention}} | {{file_example}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Rules
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List ONLY rules that AI might violate or project-specific requirements. Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Never use console.log in production code - use logger"
|
||||
- "All API responses must use ApiResponse wrapper type"
|
||||
- "Database queries must use repository pattern, never direct ORM"
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid obvious rules like "use SOLID principles" or "write clean code"]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: critical_rule>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Language-Specific Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Add ONLY if critical for preventing AI mistakes. Most teams don't need this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_language_specifics^^
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{language_name}} Specifics
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: language_rule>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{rule_topic}}:** {{rule_detail}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_language_specifics^^
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the coding standards, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Strategy and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with user to define comprehensive test strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use test frameworks from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Decide on TDD vs test-after approach
|
||||
3. Define test organization and naming
|
||||
4. Establish coverage goals
|
||||
5. Determine integration test infrastructure
|
||||
6. Plan for test data and external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Basic info goes in Coding Standards for dev agent. This detailed section is for QA agent and team reference. Apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` after initial draft.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Goals:** {{coverage_targets}}
|
||||
- **Test Pyramid:** {{test_distribution}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Types and Organization
|
||||
|
||||
#### Unit Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{unit_test_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **File Convention:** {{unit_test_naming}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{unit_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Mocking Library:** {{mocking_library}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Requirement:** {{unit_coverage}}
|
||||
|
||||
**AI Agent Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Generate tests for all public methods
|
||||
- Cover edge cases and error conditions
|
||||
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
|
||||
- Mock all external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_scope}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{integration_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Test Infrastructure:**
|
||||
<<REPEAT: test_dependency>>
|
||||
- **{{dependency_name}}:** {{test_approach}} ({{test_tool}})
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: test_dependencies}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Database:** In-memory H2 for unit tests, Testcontainers PostgreSQL for integration
|
||||
- **Message Queue:** Embedded Kafka for tests
|
||||
- **External APIs:** WireMock for stubbing
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
#### End-to-End Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{e2e_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{e2e_scope}}
|
||||
- **Environment:** {{e2e_environment}}
|
||||
- **Test Data:** {{e2e_data_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Data Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{test_data_approach}}
|
||||
- **Fixtures:** {{fixture_location}}
|
||||
- **Factories:** {{factory_pattern}}
|
||||
- **Cleanup:** {{cleanup_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Continuous Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **CI Integration:** {{ci_test_stages}}
|
||||
- **Performance Tests:** {{perf_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Security Tests:** {{security_test_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the test strategy section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Security
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define MANDATORY security requirements for AI and human developers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Focus on implementation-specific rules
|
||||
2. Reference security tools from Tech Stack
|
||||
3. Define clear patterns for common scenarios
|
||||
4. These rules directly impact code generation
|
||||
5. Work with user to ensure completeness without redundancy]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- **Validation Library:** {{validation_library}}
|
||||
- **Validation Location:** {{where_to_validate}}
|
||||
- **Required Rules:**
|
||||
- All external inputs MUST be validated
|
||||
- Validation at API boundary before processing
|
||||
- Whitelist approach preferred over blacklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
- **Auth Method:** {{auth_implementation}}
|
||||
- **Session Management:** {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- **Required Patterns:**
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_1}}
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Secrets Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **Development:** {{dev_secrets_approach}}
|
||||
- **Production:** {{prod_secrets_service}}
|
||||
- **Code Requirements:**
|
||||
- NEVER hardcode secrets
|
||||
- Access via configuration service only
|
||||
- No secrets in logs or error messages
|
||||
|
||||
### API Security
|
||||
|
||||
- **Rate Limiting:** {{rate_limit_implementation}}
|
||||
- **CORS Policy:** {{cors_configuration}}
|
||||
- **Security Headers:** {{required_headers}}
|
||||
- **HTTPS Enforcement:** {{https_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Protection
|
||||
|
||||
- **Encryption at Rest:** {{encryption_at_rest}}
|
||||
- **Encryption in Transit:** {{encryption_in_transit}}
|
||||
- **PII Handling:** {{pii_rules}}
|
||||
- **Logging Restrictions:** {{what_not_to_log}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependency Security
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scanning Tool:** {{dependency_scanner}}
|
||||
- **Update Policy:** {{update_frequency}}
|
||||
- **Approval Process:** {{new_dep_process}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **SAST Tool:** {{static_analysis}}
|
||||
- **DAST Tool:** {{dynamic_analysis}}
|
||||
- **Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_schedule}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After presenting the security section, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the `architect-checklist` and populate results here.]]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If project has UI components:
|
||||
|
||||
- Recommend engaging Design Architect agent
|
||||
- Use "Frontend Architecture Mode"
|
||||
- Provide this document as input
|
||||
|
||||
2. For all projects:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review with Product Owner
|
||||
- Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
- Set up infrastructure with DevOps agent
|
||||
|
||||
3. Include specific prompts for next agents if needed]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt to hand off to Design Architect for Frontend Architecture creation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key UI requirements from PRD
|
||||
- Any frontend-specific decisions made here
|
||||
- Request for detailed frontend architecture]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and coding standards
|
||||
- First epic/story to implement
|
||||
- Key technical decisions to follow]]
|
||||
658
bmad-core/templates/architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
658
bmad-core/templates/architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. If at a minimum you cannot locate docs/prd.md ask the user what docs will provide the basis for the architecture.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-content
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the overall project architecture for {{project_name}}, including backend systems, shared services, and non-UI specific concerns. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency and adherence to chosen patterns and technologies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Frontend Architecture:**
|
||||
If the project includes a significant user interface, a separate Frontend Architecture Document will detail the frontend-specific design and MUST be used in conjunction with this document. Core technology stack choices documented herein (see "Tech Stack") are definitive for the entire project, including any frontend components.
|
||||
- id: starter-template
|
||||
title: Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Before proceeding further with architecture design, check if the project is based on a starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and brainstorming brief for any mentions of:
|
||||
- Starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- Existing projects or codebases being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Boilerplate projects or scaffolding tools
|
||||
- Previous projects to be cloned or adapted
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.)
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-configured technology stack and versions
|
||||
- Project structure and organization patterns
|
||||
- Built-in scripts and tooling
|
||||
- Existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Any limitations or constraints imposed by the starter
|
||||
- Use this analysis to inform and align your architecture decisions
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter template is mentioned but this is a greenfield project:
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate starter templates based on the tech stack preferences
|
||||
- Explain the benefits (faster setup, best practices, community support)
|
||||
- Let the user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Proceed with architecture design from scratch
|
||||
- Note that manual setup will be required for all tooling and configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Document the decision here before proceeding with the architecture design. If none, just say N/A
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: high-level-architecture
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation of the architecture. Present all subsections together at once.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technical-summary
|
||||
title: Technical Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Provide a brief paragraph (3-5 sentences) overview of:
|
||||
- The system's overall architecture style
|
||||
- Key components and their relationships
|
||||
- Primary technology choices
|
||||
- Core architectural patterns being used
|
||||
- Reference back to the PRD goals and how this architecture supports them
|
||||
- id: high-level-overview
|
||||
title: High Level Overview
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the PRD's Technical Assumptions section, describe:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The main architectural style (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless, Event-Driven)
|
||||
2. Repository structure decision from PRD (Monorepo/Polyrepo)
|
||||
3. Service architecture decision from PRD
|
||||
4. Primary user interaction flow or data flow at a conceptual level
|
||||
5. Key architectural decisions and their rationale
|
||||
- id: project-diagram
|
||||
title: High Level Project Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a Mermaid diagram that visualizes the high-level architecture. Consider:
|
||||
- System boundaries
|
||||
- Major components/services
|
||||
- Data flow directions
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- User entry points
|
||||
|
||||
- id: architectural-patterns
|
||||
title: Architectural and Design Patterns
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List the key high-level patterns that will guide the architecture. For each pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Present 2-3 viable options if multiple exist
|
||||
2. Provide your recommendation with clear rationale
|
||||
3. Get user confirmation before finalizing
|
||||
4. These patterns should align with the PRD's technical assumptions and project goals
|
||||
|
||||
Common patterns to consider:
|
||||
- Architectural style patterns (Serverless, Event-Driven, Microservices, CQRS, Hexagonal)
|
||||
- Code organization patterns (Dependency Injection, Repository, Module, Factory)
|
||||
- Data patterns (Event Sourcing, Saga, Database per Service)
|
||||
- Communication patterns (REST, GraphQL, Message Queue, Pub/Sub)
|
||||
template: "- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Serverless Architecture:** Using AWS Lambda for compute - _Rationale:_ Aligns with PRD requirement for cost optimization and automatic scaling"
|
||||
- "**Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility"
|
||||
- "**Event-Driven Communication:** Using SNS/SQS for service decoupling - _Rationale:_ Supports async processing and system resilience"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack
|
||||
title: Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection section. Work with the user to make specific choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD technical assumptions and any preferences from {root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml or an attached technical-preferences
|
||||
2. For each category, present 2-3 viable options with pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a clear recommendation based on project needs
|
||||
4. Get explicit user approval for each selection
|
||||
5. Document exact versions (avoid "latest" - pin specific versions)
|
||||
6. This table is the single source of truth - all other docs must reference these choices
|
||||
|
||||
Key decisions to finalize - before displaying the table, ensure you are aware of or ask the user about - let the user know if they are not sure on any that you can also provide suggestions with rationale:
|
||||
|
||||
- Starter templates (if any)
|
||||
- Languages and runtimes with exact versions
|
||||
- Frameworks and libraries / packages
|
||||
- Cloud provider and key services choices
|
||||
- Database and storage solutions - if unclear suggest sql or nosql or other types depending on the project and depending on cloud provider offer a suggestion
|
||||
- Development tools
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render of the table, ensure the user is aware of the importance of this sections choices, should also look for gaps or disagreements with anything, ask for any clarifications if something is unclear why its in the list, and also right away elicit feedback - this statement and the options should be rendered and then prompt right all before allowing user input.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: cloud-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Cloud Infrastructure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Provider:** {{cloud_provider}}
|
||||
- **Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
- id: technology-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
instruction: Populate the technology stack table with all relevant technologies
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "| **Language** | TypeScript | 5.3.3 | Primary development language | Strong typing, excellent tooling, team expertise |"
|
||||
- "| **Runtime** | Node.js | 20.11.0 | JavaScript runtime | LTS version, stable performance, wide ecosystem |"
|
||||
- "| **Framework** | NestJS | 10.3.2 | Backend framework | Enterprise-ready, good DI, matches team patterns |"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the core data models/entities:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
- {{relationship_1}}
|
||||
- {{relationship_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: components
|
||||
title: Components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services and their responsibilities
|
||||
2. Consider the repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo) from PRD
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-list
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: component-diagrams
|
||||
title: Component Diagrams
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-apis
|
||||
title: External APIs
|
||||
condition: Project requires external API integrations
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: core-workflows
|
||||
title: Core Workflows
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include error handling paths
|
||||
4. Document async operations
|
||||
5. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: rest-api-spec
|
||||
title: REST API Spec
|
||||
condition: Project includes REST API
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If the project includes a REST API:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
3. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
4. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
5. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use YAML format for better readability. If no REST API, skip this section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title: {{api_title}}
|
||||
version: {{api_version}}
|
||||
description: {{api_description}}
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: {{server_url}}
|
||||
description: {{server_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: database-schema
|
||||
title: Database Schema
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: source-tree
|
||||
title: Source Tree
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a project folder structure that reflects:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The chosen repository structure (monorepo/polyrepo)
|
||||
2. The service architecture (monolith/microservices/serverless)
|
||||
3. The selected tech stack and languages
|
||||
4. Component organization from above
|
||||
5. Best practices for the chosen frameworks
|
||||
6. Clear separation of concerns
|
||||
|
||||
Adapt the structure based on project needs. For monorepos, show service separation. For serverless, show function organization. Include language-specific conventions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
project-root/
|
||||
├── packages/
|
||||
│ ├── api/ # Backend API service
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared utilities/types
|
||||
│ └── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Monorepo management scripts
|
||||
└── package.json # Root package.json with workspaces
|
||||
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-deployment
|
||||
title: Infrastructure and Deployment
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the deployment architecture and practices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use IaC tool selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Choose deployment strategy appropriate for the architecture
|
||||
3. Define environments and promotion flow
|
||||
4. Establish rollback procedures
|
||||
5. Consider security, monitoring, and cost optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Get user input on deployment preferences and CI/CD tool choices.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-as-code
|
||||
title: Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Tool:** {{iac_tool}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Location:** `{{iac_directory}}`
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{iac_approach}}
|
||||
- id: deployment-strategy
|
||||
title: Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
- **CI/CD Platform:** {{cicd_platform}}
|
||||
- **Pipeline Configuration:** `{{pipeline_config_location}}`
|
||||
- id: environments
|
||||
title: Environments
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{env_name}}:** {{env_purpose}} - {{env_details}}"
|
||||
- id: promotion-flow
|
||||
title: Environment Promotion Flow
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{promotion_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: rollback-strategy
|
||||
title: Rollback Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
- **Trigger Conditions:** {{rollback_triggers}}
|
||||
- **Recovery Time Objective:** {{rto}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: error-handling-strategy
|
||||
title: Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define comprehensive error handling approach:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Choose appropriate patterns for the language/framework from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Define logging standards and tools
|
||||
3. Establish error categories and handling rules
|
||||
4. Consider observability and debugging needs
|
||||
5. Ensure security (no sensitive data in logs)
|
||||
|
||||
This section guides both AI and human developers in consistent error handling.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: general-approach
|
||||
title: General Approach
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Error Model:** {{error_model}}
|
||||
- **Exception Hierarchy:** {{exception_structure}}
|
||||
- **Error Propagation:** {{propagation_rules}}
|
||||
- id: logging-standards
|
||||
title: Logging Standards
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Library:** {{logging_library}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Format:** {{log_format}}
|
||||
- **Levels:** {{log_levels_definition}}
|
||||
- **Required Context:**
|
||||
- Correlation ID: {{correlation_id_format}}
|
||||
- Service Context: {{service_context}}
|
||||
- User Context: {{user_context_rules}}
|
||||
- id: error-patterns
|
||||
title: Error Handling Patterns
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: external-api-errors
|
||||
title: External API Errors
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Retry Policy:** {{retry_strategy}}
|
||||
- **Circuit Breaker:** {{circuit_breaker_config}}
|
||||
- **Timeout Configuration:** {{timeout_settings}}
|
||||
- **Error Translation:** {{error_mapping_rules}}
|
||||
- id: business-logic-errors
|
||||
title: Business Logic Errors
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Custom Exceptions:** {{business_exception_types}}
|
||||
- **User-Facing Errors:** {{user_error_format}}
|
||||
- **Error Codes:** {{error_code_system}}
|
||||
- id: data-consistency
|
||||
title: Data Consistency
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Transaction Strategy:** {{transaction_approach}}
|
||||
- **Compensation Logic:** {{compensation_patterns}}
|
||||
- **Idempotency:** {{idempotency_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
These standards are MANDATORY for AI agents. Work with user to define ONLY the critical rules needed to prevent bad code. Explain that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This section directly controls AI developer behavior
|
||||
2. Keep it minimal - assume AI knows general best practices
|
||||
3. Focus on project-specific conventions and gotchas
|
||||
4. Overly detailed standards bloat context and slow development
|
||||
5. Standards will be extracted to separate file for dev agent use
|
||||
|
||||
For each standard, get explicit user confirmation it's necessary.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: core-standards
|
||||
title: Core Standards
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Languages & Runtimes:** {{languages_and_versions}}
|
||||
- **Style & Linting:** {{linter_config}}
|
||||
- **Test Organization:** {{test_file_convention}}
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Element, Convention, Example]
|
||||
instruction: Only include if deviating from language defaults
|
||||
- id: critical-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Rules
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List ONLY rules that AI might violate or project-specific requirements. Examples:
|
||||
- "Never use console.log in production code - use logger"
|
||||
- "All API responses must use ApiResponse wrapper type"
|
||||
- "Database queries must use repository pattern, never direct ORM"
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid obvious rules like "use SOLID principles" or "write clean code"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}"
|
||||
- id: language-specifics
|
||||
title: Language-Specific Guidelines
|
||||
condition: Critical language-specific rules needed
|
||||
instruction: Add ONLY if critical for preventing AI mistakes. Most teams don't need this section.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: language-rules
|
||||
title: "{{language_name}} Specifics"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_topic}}:** {{rule_detail}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: test-strategy
|
||||
title: Test Strategy and Standards
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Work with user to define comprehensive test strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use test frameworks from Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Decide on TDD vs test-after approach
|
||||
3. Define test organization and naming
|
||||
4. Establish coverage goals
|
||||
5. Determine integration test infrastructure
|
||||
6. Plan for test data and external dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Basic info goes in Coding Standards for dev agent. This detailed section is for QA agent and team reference.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-philosophy
|
||||
title: Testing Philosophy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Approach:** {{test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Goals:** {{coverage_targets}}
|
||||
- **Test Pyramid:** {{test_distribution}}
|
||||
- id: test-types
|
||||
title: Test Types and Organization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: unit-tests
|
||||
title: Unit Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{unit_test_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **File Convention:** {{unit_test_naming}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{unit_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Mocking Library:** {{mocking_library}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Requirement:** {{unit_coverage}}
|
||||
|
||||
**AI Agent Requirements:**
|
||||
- Generate tests for all public methods
|
||||
- Cover edge cases and error conditions
|
||||
- Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
|
||||
- Mock all external dependencies
|
||||
- id: integration-tests
|
||||
title: Integration Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_scope}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{integration_test_location}}
|
||||
- **Test Infrastructure:**
|
||||
- **{{dependency_name}}:** {{test_approach}} ({{test_tool}})
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Database:** In-memory H2 for unit tests, Testcontainers PostgreSQL for integration"
|
||||
- "**Message Queue:** Embedded Kafka for tests"
|
||||
- "**External APIs:** WireMock for stubbing"
|
||||
- id: e2e-tests
|
||||
title: End-to-End Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{e2e_framework}} {{version}}
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{e2e_scope}}
|
||||
- **Environment:** {{e2e_environment}}
|
||||
- **Test Data:** {{e2e_data_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: test-data-management
|
||||
title: Test Data Management
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strategy:** {{test_data_approach}}
|
||||
- **Fixtures:** {{fixture_location}}
|
||||
- **Factories:** {{factory_pattern}}
|
||||
- **Cleanup:** {{cleanup_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: continuous-testing
|
||||
title: Continuous Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **CI Integration:** {{ci_test_stages}}
|
||||
- **Performance Tests:** {{perf_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Security Tests:** {{security_test_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security
|
||||
title: Security
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define MANDATORY security requirements for AI and human developers:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Focus on implementation-specific rules
|
||||
2. Reference security tools from Tech Stack
|
||||
3. Define clear patterns for common scenarios
|
||||
4. These rules directly impact code generation
|
||||
5. Work with user to ensure completeness without redundancy
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: input-validation
|
||||
title: Input Validation
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Validation Library:** {{validation_library}}
|
||||
- **Validation Location:** {{where_to_validate}}
|
||||
- **Required Rules:**
|
||||
- All external inputs MUST be validated
|
||||
- Validation at API boundary before processing
|
||||
- Whitelist approach preferred over blacklist
|
||||
- id: auth-authorization
|
||||
title: Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Auth Method:** {{auth_implementation}}
|
||||
- **Session Management:** {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- **Required Patterns:**
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_1}}
|
||||
- {{auth_pattern_2}}
|
||||
- id: secrets-management
|
||||
title: Secrets Management
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Development:** {{dev_secrets_approach}}
|
||||
- **Production:** {{prod_secrets_service}}
|
||||
- **Code Requirements:**
|
||||
- NEVER hardcode secrets
|
||||
- Access via configuration service only
|
||||
- No secrets in logs or error messages
|
||||
- id: api-security
|
||||
title: API Security
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Rate Limiting:** {{rate_limit_implementation}}
|
||||
- **CORS Policy:** {{cors_configuration}}
|
||||
- **Security Headers:** {{required_headers}}
|
||||
- **HTTPS Enforcement:** {{https_approach}}
|
||||
- id: data-protection
|
||||
title: Data Protection
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Encryption at Rest:** {{encryption_at_rest}}
|
||||
- **Encryption in Transit:** {{encryption_in_transit}}
|
||||
- **PII Handling:** {{pii_rules}}
|
||||
- **Logging Restrictions:** {{what_not_to_log}}
|
||||
- id: dependency-security
|
||||
title: Dependency Security
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scanning Tool:** {{dependency_scanner}}
|
||||
- **Update Policy:** {{update_frequency}}
|
||||
- **Approval Process:** {{new_dep_process}}
|
||||
- id: security-testing
|
||||
title: Security Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **SAST Tool:** {{static_analysis}}
|
||||
- **DAST Tool:** {{dynamic_analysis}}
|
||||
- **Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_schedule}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the architect-checklist and populate results here.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If project has UI components:
|
||||
- Recommend engaging Design Architect agent
|
||||
- Use "Frontend Architecture Mode"
|
||||
- Provide this document as input
|
||||
|
||||
2. For all projects:
|
||||
- Review with Product Owner
|
||||
- Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
- Set up infrastructure with DevOps agent
|
||||
|
||||
3. Include specific prompts for next agents if needed
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-architect-prompt
|
||||
title: Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
condition: Project has UI components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt to hand off to Design Architect for Frontend Architecture creation. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key UI requirements from PRD
|
||||
- Any frontend-specific decisions made here
|
||||
- Request for detailed frontend architecture
|
||||
- id: developer-handoff
|
||||
title: Developer Handoff
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and coding standards
|
||||
- First epic/story to implement
|
||||
- Key technical decisions to follow
|
||||
@@ -1,149 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/brainstorming-session-results.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Brainstorming Session Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Date:** [DATE]
|
||||
**Facilitator:** [Agent Role] [Agent Name]
|
||||
**Participant:** [USER NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Topic:** [SESSION TOPIC]
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Goals:** [STATED GOALS]
|
||||
|
||||
**Techniques Used:** [LIST OF TECHNIQUES AND DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Ideas Generated:** [NUMBER]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Themes Identified:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [THEME 1]
|
||||
- [THEME 2]
|
||||
- [THEME 3]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technique Sessions
|
||||
|
||||
### [TECHNIQUE NAME 1] - [DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
**Description:** [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE]
|
||||
|
||||
**Ideas Generated:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. [USER IDEA 1]
|
||||
2. [USER IDEA 2]
|
||||
3. [USER IDEA 3]
|
||||
[etc.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Insights Discovered:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 1]
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Notable Connections:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [CONNECTION OR PATTERN IDENTIFIED]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### [TECHNIQUE NAME 2] - [DURATION]
|
||||
|
||||
[Repeat format for each technique used]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Idea Categorization
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
*Ideas ready to implement now*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Why immediate: [RATIONALE]
|
||||
- Resources needed: [BASIC REQUIREMENTS]
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Innovations
|
||||
|
||||
*Ideas requiring development/research*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Development needed: [WHAT'S REQUIRED]
|
||||
- Timeline estimate: [ROUGH TIMEFRAME]
|
||||
|
||||
### Moonshots
|
||||
|
||||
*Ambitious, transformative concepts*
|
||||
|
||||
1. **[IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
- Description: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
- Transformative potential: [WHY IT'S A MOONSHOT]
|
||||
- Challenges to overcome: [MAJOR OBSTACLES]
|
||||
|
||||
### Insights & Learnings
|
||||
|
||||
*Key realizations from the session*
|
||||
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 1]: [DESCRIPTION AND IMPLICATIONS]
|
||||
- [INSIGHT 2]: [DESCRIPTION AND IMPLICATIONS]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Planning
|
||||
|
||||
### Top 3 Priority Ideas
|
||||
|
||||
**#1 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- Rationale: [WHY THIS IS TOP PRIORITY]
|
||||
- Next steps: [SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO TAKE]
|
||||
- Resources needed: [WHAT'S REQUIRED]
|
||||
- Timeline: [WHEN TO START/COMPLETE]
|
||||
|
||||
**#2 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Same format]
|
||||
|
||||
**#3 Priority: [IDEA NAME]**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Same format]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Reflection & Follow-up
|
||||
|
||||
### What Worked Well
|
||||
|
||||
- [SUCCESSFUL ASPECT 1]
|
||||
- [SUCCESSFUL ASPECT 2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Areas for Further Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
- [AREA 1]: [WHY IT NEEDS MORE EXPLORATION]
|
||||
- [AREA 2]: [WHY IT NEEDS MORE EXPLORATION]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Follow-up Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
- [TECHNIQUE 1]: [WHY IT WOULD BE HELPFUL]
|
||||
- [TECHNIQUE 2]: [WHY IT WOULD BE HELPFUL]
|
||||
|
||||
### Questions That Emerged
|
||||
|
||||
- [QUESTION 1]
|
||||
- [QUESTION 2]
|
||||
- [QUESTION 3]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Session Planning
|
||||
|
||||
- **Suggested topics:** [FOLLOW-UP TOPICS]
|
||||
- **Recommended timeframe:** [WHEN TO RECONVENE]
|
||||
- **Preparation needed:** [WHAT TO RESEARCH/PREPARE]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Session facilitated using the BMAD-METHOD brainstorming framework*
|
||||
156
bmad-core/templates/brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
156
bmad-core/templates/brainstorming-output-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brainstorming-output-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brainstorming Session Results
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/brainstorming-session-results.md
|
||||
title: "Brainstorming Session Results"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: non-interactive
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: header
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
**Session Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Facilitator:** {{agent_role}} {{agent_name}}
|
||||
**Participant:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: summary-details
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Topic:** {{session_topic}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Goals:** {{stated_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Techniques Used:** {{techniques_list}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Ideas Generated:** {{total_ideas}}
|
||||
- id: key-themes
|
||||
title: "Key Themes Identified:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{theme}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technique-sessions
|
||||
title: Technique Sessions
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technique
|
||||
title: "{{technique_name}} - {{duration}}"
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: description
|
||||
template: "**Description:** {{technique_description}}"
|
||||
- id: ideas-generated
|
||||
title: "Ideas Generated:"
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{idea}}"
|
||||
- id: insights
|
||||
title: "Insights Discovered:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{insight}}"
|
||||
- id: connections
|
||||
title: "Notable Connections:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{connection}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: idea-categorization
|
||||
title: Idea Categorization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-opportunities
|
||||
title: Immediate Opportunities
|
||||
content: "*Ideas ready to implement now*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Why immediate: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{requirements}}
|
||||
- id: future-innovations
|
||||
title: Future Innovations
|
||||
content: "*Ideas requiring development/research*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Development needed: {{development_needed}}
|
||||
- Timeline estimate: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: moonshots
|
||||
title: Moonshots
|
||||
content: "*Ambitious, transformative concepts*"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**{{idea_name}}**
|
||||
- Description: {{description}}
|
||||
- Transformative potential: {{potential}}
|
||||
- Challenges to overcome: {{challenges}}
|
||||
- id: insights-learnings
|
||||
title: Insights & Learnings
|
||||
content: "*Key realizations from the session*"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{insight}}: {{description_and_implications}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: action-planning
|
||||
title: Action Planning
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: top-priorities
|
||||
title: Top 3 Priority Ideas
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: priority-1
|
||||
title: "#1 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: priority-2
|
||||
title: "#2 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
- id: priority-3
|
||||
title: "#3 Priority: {{idea_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- Rationale: {{rationale}}
|
||||
- Next steps: {{next_steps}}
|
||||
- Resources needed: {{resources}}
|
||||
- Timeline: {{timeline}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: reflection-followup
|
||||
title: Reflection & Follow-up
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: what-worked
|
||||
title: What Worked Well
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{aspect}}"
|
||||
- id: areas-exploration
|
||||
title: Areas for Further Exploration
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{area}}: {{reason}}"
|
||||
- id: recommended-techniques
|
||||
title: Recommended Follow-up Techniques
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{technique}}: {{reason}}"
|
||||
- id: questions-emerged
|
||||
title: Questions That Emerged
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{question}}"
|
||||
- id: next-session
|
||||
title: Next Session Planning
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Suggested topics:** {{followup_topics}}
|
||||
- **Recommended timeframe:** {{timeframe}}
|
||||
- **Preparation needed:** {{preparation}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: footer
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Session facilitated using the BMAD-METHOD brainstorming framework*
|
||||
@@ -1,544 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Brownfield Enhancement Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: IMPORTANT - SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This architecture document is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive architectural planning. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Complexity**: Confirm this enhancement requires architectural planning. For simple additions, recommend: "For simpler changes that don't require architectural planning, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **REQUIRED INPUTS**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Completed brownfield-prd.md
|
||||
- Existing project technical documentation (from docs folder or user-provided)
|
||||
- Access to existing project structure (IDE or uploaded files)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **DEEP ANALYSIS MANDATE**: You MUST conduct thorough analysis of the existing codebase, architecture patterns, and technical constraints before making ANY architectural recommendations. Every suggestion must be based on actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **CONTINUOUS VALIDATION**: Throughout this process, explicitly validate your understanding with the user. For every architectural decision, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing system, I recommend [decision] because [evidence from actual project]. Does this align with your system's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
If any required inputs are missing, request them before proceeding.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section establishes the document's purpose and scope for brownfield enhancements. Keep the content below but ensure project name and enhancement details are properly substituted.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the architectural approach for enhancing {{Project Name}} with {{Enhancement Description}}. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development of new features while ensuring seamless integration with the existing system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Existing Architecture:**
|
||||
This document supplements existing project architecture by defining how new components will integrate with current systems. Where conflicts arise between new and existing patterns, this document provides guidance on maintaining consistency while implementing enhancements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze the existing project structure and architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review existing documentation in docs folder
|
||||
2. Examine current technology stack and versions
|
||||
3. Identify existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
4. Note current deployment and infrastructure setup
|
||||
5. Document any constraints or limitations
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: After your analysis, explicitly validate your findings: "Based on my analysis of your project, I've identified the following about your existing system: [key findings]. Please confirm these observations are accurate before I proceed with architectural recommendations."
|
||||
|
||||
Present findings and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Project State:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Purpose:** {{existing_project_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Current Tech Stack:** {{existing_tech_summary}}
|
||||
- **Architecture Style:** {{existing_architecture_style}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{existing_deployment_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Available Documentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{existing_docs_summary}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Identified Constraints:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{constraint_1}}
|
||||
- {{constraint_2}}
|
||||
- {{constraint_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Change | Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| ------ | ---- | ------- | ----------- | ------ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhancement Scope and Integration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will integrate with the existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the brownfield PRD enhancement scope
|
||||
2. Identify integration points with existing code
|
||||
3. Define boundaries between new and existing functionality
|
||||
4. Establish compatibility requirements
|
||||
|
||||
VALIDATION CHECKPOINT: Before presenting the integration strategy, confirm: "Based on my analysis, the integration approach I'm proposing takes into account [specific existing system characteristics]. These integration points and boundaries respect your current architecture patterns. Is this assessment accurate?"
|
||||
|
||||
Present complete integration strategy and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Type:** {{enhancement_type}}
|
||||
**Scope:** {{enhancement_scope}}
|
||||
**Integration Impact:** {{integration_impact_level}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Integration Strategy:** {{code_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**Database Integration:** {{database_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**API Integration:** {{api_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**UI Integration:** {{ui_integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Database Schema Compatibility:** {{db_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **UI/UX Consistency:** {{ui_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Performance Impact:** {{performance_constraints}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Tech Stack Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure new components align with existing technology choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing technology stack as the foundation
|
||||
2. Only introduce new technologies if absolutely necessary
|
||||
3. Justify any new additions with clear rationale
|
||||
4. Ensure version compatibility with existing dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Present complete tech stack alignment and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document the current stack that must be maintained or integrated with]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Current Technology | Version | Usage in Enhancement | Notes |
|
||||
| :----------------- | :----------------- | :---------- | :------------------- | :-------- |
|
||||
| **Language** | {{language}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Runtime** | {{runtime}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Database** | {{database}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **API Style** | {{api_style}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Authentication** | {{auth}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{usage}} | {{notes}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### New Technology Additions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if new technologies are required for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_tech^^
|
||||
|
||||
| Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale | Integration Method |
|
||||
| :----------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------ | :----------------- |
|
||||
| {{new_tech}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{rationale}} | {{integration}} |
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_tech^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Models and Schema Changes
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new data models and how they integrate with existing schema:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new entities required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define relationships with existing data models
|
||||
3. Plan database schema changes (additions, modifications)
|
||||
4. Ensure backward compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
Present data model changes and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New Data Models
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_data_model>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{model_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
**Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **With Existing:** {{existing_relationships}}
|
||||
- **With New:** {{new_relationships}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Integration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Database Changes Required:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **New Tables:** {{new_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **Modified Tables:** {{modified_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **New Indexes:** {{new_indexes_list}}
|
||||
- **Migration Strategy:** {{migration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward Compatibility:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_1}}
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new components and their integration with existing architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new components required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define interfaces with existing components
|
||||
3. Establish clear boundaries and responsibilities
|
||||
4. Plan integration points and data flow
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY VALIDATION: Before presenting component architecture, confirm: "The new components I'm proposing follow the existing architectural patterns I identified in your codebase: [specific patterns]. The integration interfaces respect your current component structure and communication patterns. Does this match your project's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
Present component architecture and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New Components
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_component>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{integration_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing Components:** {{existing_dependencies}}
|
||||
- **New Components:** {{new_dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Interaction Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create Mermaid diagram showing how new components interact with existing ones]]
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{component_interaction_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## API Design and Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define new API endpoints and integration with existing APIs:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Plan new API endpoints required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Ensure consistency with existing API patterns
|
||||
3. Define authentication and authorization integration
|
||||
4. Plan versioning strategy if needed
|
||||
|
||||
Present API design and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### New API Endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy:** {{api_integration_strategy}}
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{auth_integration}}
|
||||
**Versioning:** {{versioning_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: new_endpoint>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{endpoint_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Method:** {{http_method}}
|
||||
- **Endpoint:** {{endpoint_path}}
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Request:**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{{request_schema}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{{response_schema}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_api^^
|
||||
|
||||
## External API Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document new external API integrations required for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_new_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: external_api>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{api_name}} API
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL:** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Integration Method:** {{integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Error Handling:** {{error_handling_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_new_external_apis^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Source Tree Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how new code will integrate with existing project structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing project organization patterns
|
||||
2. Identify where new files/folders will be placed
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing naming conventions
|
||||
4. Plan for minimal disruption to existing structure
|
||||
|
||||
Present integration plan and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document relevant parts of current structure]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{existing_structure_relevant_parts}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### New File Organization
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Show only new additions to existing structure]]
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── {{existing_structure_context}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{new_folder_1}}/ # {{purpose_1}}
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{new_file_1}}
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_2}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{existing_folder}}/ # Existing folder with additions
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{existing_file}} # Existing file
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_3}} # New addition
|
||||
│ └── {{new_folder_2}}/ # {{purpose_2}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **File Naming:** {{file_naming_consistency}}
|
||||
- **Folder Organization:** {{folder_organization_approach}}
|
||||
- **Import/Export Patterns:** {{import_export_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure and Deployment Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will be deployed alongside existing infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing deployment pipeline and infrastructure
|
||||
2. Identify any infrastructure changes needed
|
||||
3. Plan deployment strategy to minimize risk
|
||||
4. Define rollback procedures
|
||||
|
||||
Present deployment integration and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Deployment:** {{existing_deployment_summary}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Tools:** {{existing_infrastructure_tools}}
|
||||
**Environments:** {{existing_environments}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Deployment Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Deployment Approach:** {{deployment_approach}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Changes:** {{infrastructure_changes}}
|
||||
**Pipeline Integration:** {{pipeline_integration}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Rollback Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Rollback Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:** {{risk_mitigation}}
|
||||
**Monitoring:** {{monitoring_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Coding Standards and Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure new code follows existing project conventions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document existing coding standards from project analysis
|
||||
2. Identify any enhancement-specific requirements
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing codebase patterns
|
||||
4. Define standards for new code organization
|
||||
|
||||
Present coding standards and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Standards Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Style:** {{existing_code_style}}
|
||||
**Linting Rules:** {{existing_linting}}
|
||||
**Testing Patterns:** {{existing_test_patterns}}
|
||||
**Documentation Style:** {{existing_doc_style}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement-Specific Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Only include if new patterns are needed for the enhancement]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: enhancement_standard>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{standard_name}}:** {{standard_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Integration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility_rule}}
|
||||
- **Database Integration:** {{db_integration_rule}}
|
||||
- **Error Handling:** {{error_handling_integration}}
|
||||
- **Logging Consistency:** {{logging_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define testing approach for the enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Integrate with existing test suite
|
||||
2. Ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
3. Plan for testing new features
|
||||
4. Define integration testing approach
|
||||
|
||||
Present testing strategy and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Existing Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing Test Framework:** {{existing_test_framework}}
|
||||
**Test Organization:** {{existing_test_organization}}
|
||||
**Coverage Requirements:** {{existing_coverage_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### New Testing Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Unit Tests for New Components
|
||||
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{test_framework}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{test_location}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Target:** {{coverage_target}}
|
||||
- **Integration with Existing:** {{test_integration}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_test_scope}}
|
||||
- **Existing System Verification:** {{existing_system_verification}}
|
||||
- **New Feature Testing:** {{new_feature_testing}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Regression Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Existing Feature Verification:** {{regression_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Automated Regression Suite:** {{automated_regression}}
|
||||
- **Manual Testing Requirements:** {{manual_testing_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Ensure security consistency with existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing security patterns and tools
|
||||
2. Ensure new features don't introduce vulnerabilities
|
||||
3. Maintain existing security posture
|
||||
4. Define security testing for new components
|
||||
|
||||
Present security integration and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Security Measures
|
||||
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{existing_auth}}
|
||||
**Authorization:** {{existing_authz}}
|
||||
**Data Protection:** {{existing_data_protection}}
|
||||
**Security Tools:** {{existing_security_tools}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Security Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**New Security Measures:** {{new_security_measures}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{security_integration_points}}
|
||||
**Compliance Requirements:** {{compliance_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing Security Tests:** {{existing_security_tests}}
|
||||
**New Security Test Requirements:** {{new_security_tests}}
|
||||
**Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify and plan for risks specific to brownfield development:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Technical integration risks
|
||||
2. Deployment and operational risks
|
||||
3. User impact and compatibility risks
|
||||
4. Mitigation strategies for each risk
|
||||
|
||||
Present risk assessment and apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Risks
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: technical_risk>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk:** {{risk_description}}
|
||||
**Impact:** {{impact_level}}
|
||||
**Likelihood:** {{likelihood}}
|
||||
**Mitigation:** {{mitigation_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Operational Risks
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: operational_risk>>
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk:** {{risk_description}}
|
||||
**Impact:** {{impact_level}}
|
||||
**Likelihood:** {{likelihood}}
|
||||
**Mitigation:** {{mitigation_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Monitoring and Alerting
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhanced Monitoring:** {{monitoring_additions}}
|
||||
**New Alerts:** {{new_alerts}}
|
||||
**Performance Monitoring:** {{performance_monitoring}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Execute the architect-checklist and populate results here, focusing on brownfield-specific validation]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the brownfield architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review integration points with existing system
|
||||
2. Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
3. Set up deployment pipeline integration
|
||||
4. Plan rollback and monitoring procedures]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Story Manager Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for Story Manager to work with this brownfield enhancement. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key integration requirements validated with user
|
||||
- Existing system constraints based on actual project analysis
|
||||
- First story to implement with clear integration checkpoints
|
||||
- Emphasis on maintaining existing system integrity throughout implementation]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and existing coding standards analyzed from actual project
|
||||
- Integration requirements with existing codebase validated with user
|
||||
- Key technical decisions based on real project constraints
|
||||
- Existing system compatibility requirements with specific verification steps
|
||||
- Clear sequencing of implementation to minimize risk to existing functionality]]
|
||||
476
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
476
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brownfield-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brownfield Enhancement Architecture
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Brownfield Enhancement Architecture"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
IMPORTANT - SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This architecture document is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive architectural planning. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Complexity**: Confirm this enhancement requires architectural planning. For simple additions, recommend: "For simpler changes that don't require architectural planning, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **REQUIRED INPUTS**:
|
||||
- Completed brownfield-prd.md
|
||||
- Existing project technical documentation (from docs folder or user-provided)
|
||||
- Access to existing project structure (IDE or uploaded files)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **DEEP ANALYSIS MANDATE**: You MUST conduct thorough analysis of the existing codebase, architecture patterns, and technical constraints before making ANY architectural recommendations. Every suggestion must be based on actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **CONTINUOUS VALIDATION**: Throughout this process, explicitly validate your understanding with the user. For every architectural decision, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing system, I recommend [decision] because [evidence from actual project]. Does this align with your system's reality?"
|
||||
|
||||
If any required inputs are missing, request them before proceeding.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-content
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the architectural approach for enhancing {{project_name}} with {{enhancement_description}}. Its primary goal is to serve as the guiding architectural blueprint for AI-driven development of new features while ensuring seamless integration with the existing system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationship to Existing Architecture:**
|
||||
This document supplements existing project architecture by defining how new components will integrate with current systems. Where conflicts arise between new and existing patterns, this document provides guidance on maintaining consistency while implementing enhancements.
|
||||
- id: existing-project-analysis
|
||||
title: Existing Project Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Analyze the existing project structure and architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review existing documentation in docs folder
|
||||
2. Examine current technology stack and versions
|
||||
3. Identify existing architectural patterns and conventions
|
||||
4. Note current deployment and infrastructure setup
|
||||
5. Document any constraints or limitations
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: After your analysis, explicitly validate your findings: "Based on my analysis of your project, I've identified the following about your existing system: [key findings]. Please confirm these observations are accurate before I proceed with architectural recommendations."
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: current-state
|
||||
title: Current Project State
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary Purpose:** {{existing_project_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Current Tech Stack:** {{existing_tech_summary}}
|
||||
- **Architecture Style:** {{existing_architecture_style}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{existing_deployment_approach}}
|
||||
- id: available-docs
|
||||
title: Available Documentation
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{existing_docs_summary}}"
|
||||
- id: constraints
|
||||
title: Identified Constraints
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{constraint}}"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Change, Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: enhancement-scope
|
||||
title: Enhancement Scope and Integration Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how the enhancement will integrate with the existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the brownfield PRD enhancement scope
|
||||
2. Identify integration points with existing code
|
||||
3. Define boundaries between new and existing functionality
|
||||
4. Establish compatibility requirements
|
||||
|
||||
VALIDATION CHECKPOINT: Before presenting the integration strategy, confirm: "Based on my analysis, the integration approach I'm proposing takes into account [specific existing system characteristics]. These integration points and boundaries respect your current architecture patterns. Is this assessment accurate?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: enhancement-overview
|
||||
title: Enhancement Overview
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Enhancement Type:** {{enhancement_type}}
|
||||
**Scope:** {{enhancement_scope}}
|
||||
**Integration Impact:** {{integration_impact_level}}
|
||||
- id: integration-approach
|
||||
title: Integration Approach
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Code Integration Strategy:** {{code_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**Database Integration:** {{database_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**API Integration:** {{api_integration_approach}}
|
||||
**UI Integration:** {{ui_integration_approach}}
|
||||
- id: compatibility-requirements
|
||||
title: Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Database Schema Compatibility:** {{db_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **UI/UX Consistency:** {{ui_compatibility}}
|
||||
- **Performance Impact:** {{performance_constraints}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-alignment
|
||||
title: Tech Stack Alignment
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure new components align with existing technology choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing technology stack as the foundation
|
||||
2. Only introduce new technologies if absolutely necessary
|
||||
3. Justify any new additions with clear rationale
|
||||
4. Ensure version compatibility with existing dependencies
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-stack
|
||||
title: Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Current Technology, Version, Usage in Enhancement, Notes]
|
||||
instruction: Document the current stack that must be maintained or integrated with
|
||||
- id: new-tech-additions
|
||||
title: New Technology Additions
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires new technologies
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale, Integration Method]
|
||||
instruction: Only include if new technologies are required for the enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models and Schema Changes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new data models and how they integrate with existing schema:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new entities required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define relationships with existing data models
|
||||
3. Plan database schema changes (additions, modifications)
|
||||
4. Ensure backward compatibility
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: new-models
|
||||
title: New Data Models
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
**Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Relationships:**
|
||||
- **With Existing:** {{existing_relationships}}
|
||||
- **With New:** {{new_relationships}}
|
||||
- id: schema-integration
|
||||
title: Schema Integration Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Database Changes Required:**
|
||||
- **New Tables:** {{new_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **Modified Tables:** {{modified_tables_list}}
|
||||
- **New Indexes:** {{new_indexes_list}}
|
||||
- **Migration Strategy:** {{migration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backward Compatibility:**
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_1}}
|
||||
- {{compatibility_measure_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-architecture
|
||||
title: Component Architecture
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new components and their integration with existing architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify new components required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Define interfaces with existing components
|
||||
3. Establish clear boundaries and responsibilities
|
||||
4. Plan integration points and data flow
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY VALIDATION: Before presenting component architecture, confirm: "The new components I'm proposing follow the existing architectural patterns I identified in your codebase: [specific patterns]. The integration interfaces respect your current component structure and communication patterns. Does this match your project's reality?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: new-components
|
||||
title: New Components
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{integration_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:**
|
||||
- **Existing Components:** {{existing_dependencies}}
|
||||
- **New Components:** {{new_dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: interaction-diagram
|
||||
title: Component Interaction Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: Create Mermaid diagram showing how new components interact with existing ones
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-design
|
||||
title: API Design and Integration
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires API changes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define new API endpoints and integration with existing APIs:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Plan new API endpoints required for the enhancement
|
||||
2. Ensure consistency with existing API patterns
|
||||
3. Define authentication and authorization integration
|
||||
4. Plan versioning strategy if needed
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api-strategy
|
||||
title: API Integration Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy:** {{api_integration_strategy}}
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{auth_integration}}
|
||||
**Versioning:** {{versioning_approach}}
|
||||
- id: new-endpoints
|
||||
title: New API Endpoints
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: endpoint
|
||||
title: "{{endpoint_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Method:** {{http_method}}
|
||||
- **Endpoint:** {{endpoint_path}}
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Integration:** {{integration_with_existing}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: request
|
||||
title: Request
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: json
|
||||
template: "{{request_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: response
|
||||
title: Response
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: json
|
||||
template: "{{response_schema}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-api-integration
|
||||
title: External API Integration
|
||||
condition: Enhancement requires new external APIs
|
||||
instruction: Document new external API integrations required for the enhancement
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: external-api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL:** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Integration Method:** {{integration_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Error Handling:** {{error_handling_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: source-tree-integration
|
||||
title: Source Tree Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how new code will integrate with existing project structure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing project organization patterns
|
||||
2. Identify where new files/folders will be placed
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing naming conventions
|
||||
4. Plan for minimal disruption to existing structure
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-structure
|
||||
title: Existing Project Structure
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: Document relevant parts of current structure
|
||||
template: "{{existing_structure_relevant_parts}}"
|
||||
- id: new-file-organization
|
||||
title: New File Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
instruction: Show only new additions to existing structure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
{{project-root}}/
|
||||
├── {{existing_structure_context}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{new_folder_1}}/ # {{purpose_1}}
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{new_file_1}}
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_2}}
|
||||
│ ├── {{existing_folder}}/ # Existing folder with additions
|
||||
│ │ ├── {{existing_file}} # Existing file
|
||||
│ │ └── {{new_file_3}} # New addition
|
||||
│ └── {{new_folder_2}}/ # {{purpose_2}}
|
||||
- id: integration-guidelines
|
||||
title: Integration Guidelines
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **File Naming:** {{file_naming_consistency}}
|
||||
- **Folder Organization:** {{folder_organization_approach}}
|
||||
- **Import/Export Patterns:** {{import_export_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: infrastructure-deployment
|
||||
title: Infrastructure and Deployment Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define how the enhancement will be deployed alongside existing infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use existing deployment pipeline and infrastructure
|
||||
2. Identify any infrastructure changes needed
|
||||
3. Plan deployment strategy to minimize risk
|
||||
4. Define rollback procedures
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Existing Infrastructure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Current Deployment:** {{existing_deployment_summary}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Tools:** {{existing_infrastructure_tools}}
|
||||
**Environments:** {{existing_environments}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-deployment
|
||||
title: Enhancement Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Deployment Approach:** {{deployment_approach}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure Changes:** {{infrastructure_changes}}
|
||||
**Pipeline Integration:** {{pipeline_integration}}
|
||||
- id: rollback-strategy
|
||||
title: Rollback Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Rollback Method:** {{rollback_method}}
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:** {{risk_mitigation}}
|
||||
**Monitoring:** {{monitoring_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards and Conventions
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure new code follows existing project conventions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document existing coding standards from project analysis
|
||||
2. Identify any enhancement-specific requirements
|
||||
3. Ensure consistency with existing codebase patterns
|
||||
4. Define standards for new code organization
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-standards
|
||||
title: Existing Standards Compliance
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Code Style:** {{existing_code_style}}
|
||||
**Linting Rules:** {{existing_linting}}
|
||||
**Testing Patterns:** {{existing_test_patterns}}
|
||||
**Documentation Style:** {{existing_doc_style}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-standards
|
||||
title: Enhancement-Specific Standards
|
||||
condition: New patterns needed for enhancement
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{standard_name}}:** {{standard_description}}"
|
||||
- id: integration-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Integration Rules
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing API Compatibility:** {{api_compatibility_rule}}
|
||||
- **Database Integration:** {{db_integration_rule}}
|
||||
- **Error Handling:** {{error_handling_integration}}
|
||||
- **Logging Consistency:** {{logging_consistency}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define testing approach for the enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Integrate with existing test suite
|
||||
2. Ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
3. Plan for testing new features
|
||||
4. Define integration testing approach
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-test-integration
|
||||
title: Integration with Existing Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Existing Test Framework:** {{existing_test_framework}}
|
||||
**Test Organization:** {{existing_test_organization}}
|
||||
**Coverage Requirements:** {{existing_coverage_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: new-testing
|
||||
title: New Testing Requirements
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: unit-tests
|
||||
title: Unit Tests for New Components
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Framework:** {{test_framework}}
|
||||
- **Location:** {{test_location}}
|
||||
- **Coverage Target:** {{coverage_target}}
|
||||
- **Integration with Existing:** {{test_integration}}
|
||||
- id: integration-tests
|
||||
title: Integration Tests
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Scope:** {{integration_test_scope}}
|
||||
- **Existing System Verification:** {{existing_system_verification}}
|
||||
- **New Feature Testing:** {{new_feature_testing}}
|
||||
- id: regression-tests
|
||||
title: Regression Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Existing Feature Verification:** {{regression_test_approach}}
|
||||
- **Automated Regression Suite:** {{automated_regression}}
|
||||
- **Manual Testing Requirements:** {{manual_testing_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security-integration
|
||||
title: Security Integration
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Ensure security consistency with existing system:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Follow existing security patterns and tools
|
||||
2. Ensure new features don't introduce vulnerabilities
|
||||
3. Maintain existing security posture
|
||||
4. Define security testing for new components
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-security
|
||||
title: Existing Security Measures
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Authentication:** {{existing_auth}}
|
||||
**Authorization:** {{existing_authz}}
|
||||
**Data Protection:** {{existing_data_protection}}
|
||||
**Security Tools:** {{existing_security_tools}}
|
||||
- id: enhancement-security
|
||||
title: Enhancement Security Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**New Security Measures:** {{new_security_measures}}
|
||||
**Integration Points:** {{security_integration_points}}
|
||||
**Compliance Requirements:** {{compliance_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: security-testing
|
||||
title: Security Testing
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Existing Security Tests:** {{existing_security_tests}}
|
||||
**New Security Test Requirements:** {{new_security_tests}}
|
||||
**Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Execute the architect-checklist and populate results here, focusing on brownfield-specific validation
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the brownfield architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review integration points with existing system
|
||||
2. Begin story implementation with Dev agent
|
||||
3. Set up deployment pipeline integration
|
||||
4. Plan rollback and monitoring procedures
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: story-manager-handoff
|
||||
title: Story Manager Handoff
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt for Story Manager to work with this brownfield enhancement. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture document
|
||||
- Key integration requirements validated with user
|
||||
- Existing system constraints based on actual project analysis
|
||||
- First story to implement with clear integration checkpoints
|
||||
- Emphasis on maintaining existing system integrity throughout implementation
|
||||
- id: developer-handoff
|
||||
title: Developer Handoff
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a brief prompt for developers starting implementation. Include:
|
||||
- Reference to this architecture and existing coding standards analyzed from actual project
|
||||
- Integration requirements with existing codebase validated with user
|
||||
- Key technical decisions based on real project constraints
|
||||
- Existing system compatibility requirements with specific verification steps
|
||||
- Clear sequencing of implementation to minimize risk to existing functionality
|
||||
@@ -1,266 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Brownfield Enhancement PRD
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/prd.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: IMPORTANT - SCOPE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive planning and multiple stories. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Assess Enhancement Complexity**: If this is a simple feature addition or bug fix that could be completed in 1-2 focused development sessions, STOP and recommend: "For simpler changes, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead. This full PRD process is designed for substantial enhancements that require architectural planning and multiple coordinated stories."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Project Context**: Determine if we're working in an IDE with the project already loaded or if the user needs to provide project information. If project files are available, analyze existing documentation in the docs folder. If insufficient documentation exists, recommend running the document-project task first.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Deep Assessment Requirement**: You MUST thoroughly analyze the existing project structure, patterns, and constraints before making ANY suggestions. Every recommendation must be grounded in actual project analysis, not assumptions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Intro Project Analysis and Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Gather comprehensive information about the existing project. This section must be completed before proceeding with requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Throughout this analysis, explicitly confirm your understanding with the user. For every assumption you make about the existing project, ask: "Based on my analysis, I understand that [assumption]. Is this correct?"
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed with any recommendations until the user has validated your understanding of the existing system.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Project Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Check if document-project analysis was already performed. If yes, reference that output instead of re-analyzing.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Source**: [[LLM: Indicate one of the following:
|
||||
- Document-project output available at: {{path}}
|
||||
- IDE-based fresh analysis
|
||||
- User-provided information
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Project State**: [[LLM:
|
||||
- If document-project output exists: Extract summary from "High Level Architecture" and "Technical Summary" sections
|
||||
- Otherwise: Brief description of what the project currently does and its primary purpose
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Documentation Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project was run:
|
||||
- Note: "Document-project analysis available - using existing technical documentation"
|
||||
- List key documents created by document-project
|
||||
- Skip the missing documentation check below
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, check for existing documentation:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Available Documentation**:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Tech Stack Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Source Tree/Architecture [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Coding Standards [[LLM: If from document-project, may be partial]]
|
||||
- [ ] API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] External API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] UX/UI Guidelines [[LLM: May not be in document-project]]
|
||||
- [ ] Technical Debt Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- [ ] Other: \***\*\_\_\_\*\***
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
- If document-project was already run: "Using existing project analysis from document-project output."
|
||||
- If critical documentation is missing and no document-project: "I recommend running the document-project task first..."
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhancement Scope Definition
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with user to clearly define what type of enhancement this is. This is critical for scoping and approach.]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Type**: [[LLM: Determine with user which applies]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] New Feature Addition
|
||||
- [ ] Major Feature Modification
|
||||
- [ ] Integration with New Systems
|
||||
- [ ] Performance/Scalability Improvements
|
||||
- [ ] UI/UX Overhaul
|
||||
- [ ] Technology Stack Upgrade
|
||||
- [ ] Bug Fix and Stability Improvements
|
||||
- [ ] Other: \***\*\_\_\_\*\***
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Description**: [[LLM: 2-3 sentences describing what the user wants to add or change]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact Assessment**: [[LLM: Assess the scope of impact on existing codebase]]
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Minimal Impact (isolated additions)
|
||||
- [ ] Moderate Impact (some existing code changes)
|
||||
- [ ] Significant Impact (substantial existing code changes)
|
||||
- [ ] Major Impact (architectural changes required)
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals and Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
#### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Bullet list of 1-line desired outcomes this enhancement will deliver if successful]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: 1-2 short paragraphs explaining why this enhancement is needed, what problem it solves, and how it fits with the existing project]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Change | Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| ------ | ---- | ------- | ----------- | ------ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Draft functional and non-functional requirements based on your validated understanding of the existing project. Before presenting requirements, confirm: "These requirements are based on my understanding of your existing system. Please review carefully and confirm they align with your project's reality." Then immediately execute tasks#advanced-elicitation display]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with FR]]
|
||||
@{example: - FR1: The existing Todo List will integrate with the new AI duplicate detection service without breaking current functionality.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Non Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with NFR. Include constraints from existing system]]
|
||||
@{example: - NFR1: Enhancement must maintain existing performance characteristics and not exceed current memory usage by more than 20%.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Critical for brownfield - what must remain compatible]]
|
||||
|
||||
- CR1: [[LLM: Existing API compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
- CR2: [[LLM: Database schema compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
- CR3: [[LLM: UI/UX consistency requirements]]
|
||||
- CR4: [[LLM: Integration compatibility requirements]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## User Interface Enhancement Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For UI changes, capture how they will integrate with existing UI patterns and design systems]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Existing UI
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe how new UI elements will fit with existing design patterns, style guides, and component libraries]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Modified/New Screens and Views
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List only the screens/views that will be modified or added]]
|
||||
|
||||
### UI Consistency Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Specific requirements for maintaining visual and interaction consistency with existing application]]
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Constraints and Integration Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section replaces separate architecture documentation. Gather detailed technical constraints from existing project analysis.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Extract from "Actual Tech Stack" table in High Level Architecture section
|
||||
- Include version numbers and any noted constraints
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, document the current technology stack:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Languages**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Frameworks**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Database**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**Infrastructure**: [[LLM: From document-project or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
**External Dependencies**: [[LLM: From document-project "External Services" section or fresh analysis]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define how the enhancement will integrate with existing architecture]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Database Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new features will interact with existing database]]
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new APIs will integrate with existing API structure]]
|
||||
**Frontend Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new UI components will integrate with existing frontend]]
|
||||
**Testing Integration Strategy**: [[LLM: How new tests will integrate with existing test suite]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Organization and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Based on existing project analysis, define how new code will fit existing patterns]]
|
||||
|
||||
**File Structure Approach**: [[LLM: How new files will fit existing project structure]]
|
||||
**Naming Conventions**: [[LLM: Existing naming conventions that must be followed]]
|
||||
**Coding Standards**: [[LLM: Existing coding standards and linting rules]]
|
||||
**Documentation Standards**: [[LLM: How new code documentation will match existing patterns]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment and Operations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: How the enhancement fits existing deployment pipeline]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Build Process Integration**: [[LLM: How enhancement builds with existing process]]
|
||||
**Deployment Strategy**: [[LLM: How enhancement will be deployed alongside existing features]]
|
||||
**Monitoring and Logging**: [[LLM: How enhancement will integrate with existing monitoring]]
|
||||
**Configuration Management**: [[LLM: How new configuration will integrate with existing config]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM:
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Reference "Technical Debt and Known Issues" section
|
||||
- Include "Workarounds and Gotchas" that might impact enhancement
|
||||
- Note any identified constraints from "Critical Technical Debt"
|
||||
|
||||
Build risk assessment incorporating existing known issues:
|
||||
]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Risks**: [[LLM: Include risks from document-project + new enhancement risks]]
|
||||
**Integration Risks**: [[LLM: Reference integration constraints from document-project]]
|
||||
**Deployment Risks**: [[LLM: Include deployment gotchas from document-project]]
|
||||
**Mitigation Strategies**: [[LLM: Address both existing and new risks]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic and Story Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For brownfield projects, favor a single comprehensive epic unless the user is clearly requesting multiple unrelated enhancements. Before presenting the epic structure, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing project, I believe this enhancement should be structured as [single epic/multiple epics] because [rationale based on actual project analysis]. Does this align with your understanding of the work required?" Then present the epic structure and immediately execute tasks#advanced-elicitation display.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Epic Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Explain the rationale for epic structure - typically single epic for brownfield unless multiple unrelated features]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Epic Structure Decision**: [[LLM: Single Epic or Multiple Epics with rationale]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic 1: {{enhancement_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Comprehensive epic that delivers the brownfield enhancement while maintaining existing functionality]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Epic Goal**: [[LLM: 2-3 sentences describing the complete enhancement objective and value]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Requirements**: [[LLM: Key integration points with existing system]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
|
||||
- Stories must ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
- Each story should include verification that existing features still work
|
||||
- Stories should be sequenced to minimize risk to existing system
|
||||
- Include rollback considerations for each story
|
||||
- Focus on incremental integration rather than big-bang changes
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution in existing codebase context
|
||||
- MANDATORY: Present the complete story sequence and ask: "This story sequence is designed to minimize risk to your existing system. Does this order make sense given your project's architecture and constraints?"
|
||||
- Stories must be logically sequential with clear dependencies identified
|
||||
- Each story must deliver value while maintaining system integrity]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: story>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Story 1.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define criteria that include both new functionality and existing system integrity]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: criteria>>
|
||||
|
||||
- {{criterion number}}: {{criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Integration Verification
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Specific verification steps to ensure existing functionality remains intact]]
|
||||
|
||||
- IV1: [[LLM: Existing functionality verification requirement]]
|
||||
- IV2: [[LLM: Integration point verification requirement]]
|
||||
- IV3: [[LLM: Performance impact verification requirement]]
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
280
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
280
bmad-core/templates/brownfield-prd-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: brownfield-prd-template-v2
|
||||
name: Brownfield Enhancement PRD
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/prd.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Brownfield Enhancement PRD"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: intro-analysis
|
||||
title: Intro Project Analysis and Context
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
IMPORTANT - SCOPE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED:
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD is for SIGNIFICANT enhancements to existing projects that require comprehensive planning and multiple stories. Before proceeding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Assess Enhancement Complexity**: If this is a simple feature addition or bug fix that could be completed in 1-2 focused development sessions, STOP and recommend: "For simpler changes, consider using the brownfield-create-epic or brownfield-create-story task with the Product Owner instead. This full PRD process is designed for substantial enhancements that require architectural planning and multiple coordinated stories."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Project Context**: Determine if we're working in an IDE with the project already loaded or if the user needs to provide project information. If project files are available, analyze existing documentation in the docs folder. If insufficient documentation exists, recommend running the document-project task first.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Deep Assessment Requirement**: You MUST thoroughly analyze the existing project structure, patterns, and constraints before making ANY suggestions. Every recommendation must be grounded in actual project analysis, not assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
Gather comprehensive information about the existing project. This section must be completed before proceeding with requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Throughout this analysis, explicitly confirm your understanding with the user. For every assumption you make about the existing project, ask: "Based on my analysis, I understand that [assumption]. Is this correct?"
|
||||
|
||||
Do not proceed with any recommendations until the user has validated your understanding of the existing system.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-project-overview
|
||||
title: Existing Project Overview
|
||||
instruction: Check if document-project analysis was already performed. If yes, reference that output instead of re-analyzing.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: analysis-source
|
||||
title: Analysis Source
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Indicate one of the following:
|
||||
- Document-project output available at: {{path}}
|
||||
- IDE-based fresh analysis
|
||||
- User-provided information
|
||||
- id: current-state
|
||||
title: Current Project State
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
- If document-project output exists: Extract summary from "High Level Architecture" and "Technical Summary" sections
|
||||
- Otherwise: Brief description of what the project currently does and its primary purpose
|
||||
- id: documentation-analysis
|
||||
title: Available Documentation Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project was run:
|
||||
- Note: "Document-project analysis available - using existing technical documentation"
|
||||
- List key documents created by document-project
|
||||
- Skip the missing documentation check below
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, check for existing documentation:
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: available-docs
|
||||
title: Available Documentation
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- Tech Stack Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- Source Tree/Architecture [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- Coding Standards [[LLM: If from document-project, may be partial]]
|
||||
- API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- External API Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- UX/UI Guidelines [[LLM: May not be in document-project]]
|
||||
- Technical Debt Documentation [[LLM: If from document-project, check ✓]]
|
||||
- "Other: {{other_docs}}"
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
- If document-project was already run: "Using existing project analysis from document-project output."
|
||||
- If critical documentation is missing and no document-project: "I recommend running the document-project task first..."
|
||||
- id: enhancement-scope
|
||||
title: Enhancement Scope Definition
|
||||
instruction: Work with user to clearly define what type of enhancement this is. This is critical for scoping and approach.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: enhancement-type
|
||||
title: Enhancement Type
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
instruction: Determine with user which applies
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- New Feature Addition
|
||||
- Major Feature Modification
|
||||
- Integration with New Systems
|
||||
- Performance/Scalability Improvements
|
||||
- UI/UX Overhaul
|
||||
- Technology Stack Upgrade
|
||||
- Bug Fix and Stability Improvements
|
||||
- "Other: {{other_type}}"
|
||||
- id: enhancement-description
|
||||
title: Enhancement Description
|
||||
instruction: 2-3 sentences describing what the user wants to add or change
|
||||
- id: impact-assessment
|
||||
title: Impact Assessment
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
instruction: Assess the scope of impact on existing codebase
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- Minimal Impact (isolated additions)
|
||||
- Moderate Impact (some existing code changes)
|
||||
- Significant Impact (substantial existing code changes)
|
||||
- Major Impact (architectural changes required)
|
||||
- id: goals-context
|
||||
title: Goals and Background Context
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: goals
|
||||
title: Goals
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
instruction: Bullet list of 1-line desired outcomes this enhancement will deliver if successful
|
||||
- id: background
|
||||
title: Background Context
|
||||
type: paragraphs
|
||||
instruction: 1-2 short paragraphs explaining why this enhancement is needed, what problem it solves, and how it fits with the existing project
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Change, Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: requirements
|
||||
title: Requirements
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Draft functional and non-functional requirements based on your validated understanding of the existing project. Before presenting requirements, confirm: "These requirements are based on my understanding of your existing system. Please review carefully and confirm they align with your project's reality."
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: functional
|
||||
title: Functional
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: FR
|
||||
instruction: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with FR
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "FR1: The existing Todo List will integrate with the new AI duplicate detection service without breaking current functionality."
|
||||
- id: non-functional
|
||||
title: Non Functional
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: NFR
|
||||
instruction: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown with identifier starting with NFR. Include constraints from existing system
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "NFR1: Enhancement must maintain existing performance characteristics and not exceed current memory usage by more than 20%."
|
||||
- id: compatibility
|
||||
title: Compatibility Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Critical for brownfield - what must remain compatible
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: CR
|
||||
template: "{{requirement}}: {{description}}"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- id: cr1
|
||||
template: "CR1: {{existing_api_compatibility}}"
|
||||
- id: cr2
|
||||
template: "CR2: {{database_schema_compatibility}}"
|
||||
- id: cr3
|
||||
template: "CR3: {{ui_ux_consistency}}"
|
||||
- id: cr4
|
||||
template: "CR4: {{integration_compatibility}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: ui-enhancement-goals
|
||||
title: User Interface Enhancement Goals
|
||||
condition: Enhancement includes UI changes
|
||||
instruction: For UI changes, capture how they will integrate with existing UI patterns and design systems
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-ui-integration
|
||||
title: Integration with Existing UI
|
||||
instruction: Describe how new UI elements will fit with existing design patterns, style guides, and component libraries
|
||||
- id: modified-screens
|
||||
title: Modified/New Screens and Views
|
||||
instruction: List only the screens/views that will be modified or added
|
||||
- id: ui-consistency
|
||||
title: UI Consistency Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Specific requirements for maintaining visual and interaction consistency with existing application
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technical-constraints
|
||||
title: Technical Constraints and Integration Requirements
|
||||
instruction: This section replaces separate architecture documentation. Gather detailed technical constraints from existing project analysis.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: existing-tech-stack
|
||||
title: Existing Technology Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Extract from "Actual Tech Stack" table in High Level Architecture section
|
||||
- Include version numbers and any noted constraints
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, document the current technology stack:
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Languages**: {{languages}}
|
||||
**Frameworks**: {{frameworks}}
|
||||
**Database**: {{database}}
|
||||
**Infrastructure**: {{infrastructure}}
|
||||
**External Dependencies**: {{external_dependencies}}
|
||||
- id: integration-approach
|
||||
title: Integration Approach
|
||||
instruction: Define how the enhancement will integrate with existing architecture
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Database Integration Strategy**: {{database_integration}}
|
||||
**API Integration Strategy**: {{api_integration}}
|
||||
**Frontend Integration Strategy**: {{frontend_integration}}
|
||||
**Testing Integration Strategy**: {{testing_integration}}
|
||||
- id: code-organization
|
||||
title: Code Organization and Standards
|
||||
instruction: Based on existing project analysis, define how new code will fit existing patterns
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**File Structure Approach**: {{file_structure}}
|
||||
**Naming Conventions**: {{naming_conventions}}
|
||||
**Coding Standards**: {{coding_standards}}
|
||||
**Documentation Standards**: {{documentation_standards}}
|
||||
- id: deployment-operations
|
||||
title: Deployment and Operations
|
||||
instruction: How the enhancement fits existing deployment pipeline
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Build Process Integration**: {{build_integration}}
|
||||
**Deployment Strategy**: {{deployment_strategy}}
|
||||
**Monitoring and Logging**: {{monitoring_logging}}
|
||||
**Configuration Management**: {{config_management}}
|
||||
- id: risk-assessment
|
||||
title: Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If document-project output available:
|
||||
- Reference "Technical Debt and Known Issues" section
|
||||
- Include "Workarounds and Gotchas" that might impact enhancement
|
||||
- Note any identified constraints from "Critical Technical Debt"
|
||||
|
||||
Build risk assessment incorporating existing known issues:
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Technical Risks**: {{technical_risks}}
|
||||
**Integration Risks**: {{integration_risks}}
|
||||
**Deployment Risks**: {{deployment_risks}}
|
||||
**Mitigation Strategies**: {{mitigation_strategies}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: epic-structure
|
||||
title: Epic and Story Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For brownfield projects, favor a single comprehensive epic unless the user is clearly requesting multiple unrelated enhancements. Before presenting the epic structure, confirm: "Based on my analysis of your existing project, I believe this enhancement should be structured as [single epic/multiple epics] because [rationale based on actual project analysis]. Does this align with your understanding of the work required?"
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: epic-approach
|
||||
title: Epic Approach
|
||||
instruction: Explain the rationale for epic structure - typically single epic for brownfield unless multiple unrelated features
|
||||
template: "**Epic Structure Decision**: {{epic_decision}} with rationale"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: epic-details
|
||||
title: "Epic 1: {{enhancement_title}}"
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Comprehensive epic that delivers the brownfield enhancement while maintaining existing functionality
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING FOR BROWNFIELD:
|
||||
- Stories must ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
- Each story should include verification that existing features still work
|
||||
- Stories should be sequenced to minimize risk to existing system
|
||||
- Include rollback considerations for each story
|
||||
- Focus on incremental integration rather than big-bang changes
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution in existing codebase context
|
||||
- MANDATORY: Present the complete story sequence and ask: "This story sequence is designed to minimize risk to your existing system. Does this order make sense given your project's architecture and constraints?"
|
||||
- Stories must be logically sequential with clear dependencies identified
|
||||
- Each story must deliver value while maintaining system integrity
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Epic Goal**: {{epic_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Requirements**: {{integration_requirements}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: story
|
||||
title: "Story 1.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}"
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: acceptance-criteria
|
||||
title: Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
instruction: Define criteria that include both new functionality and existing system integrity
|
||||
item_template: "{{criterion_number}}: {{criteria}}"
|
||||
- id: integration-verification
|
||||
title: Integration Verification
|
||||
instruction: Specific verification steps to ensure existing functionality remains intact
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
prefix: IV
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- template: "IV1: {{existing_functionality_verification}}"
|
||||
- template: "IV2: {{integration_point_verification}}"
|
||||
- template: "IV3: {{performance_impact_verification}}"
|
||||
@@ -1,291 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Competitive Analysis Report: {{Project/Product Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/competitor-analysis.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides comprehensive competitor analysis. Start by understanding the user's competitive intelligence needs and strategic objectives. Help them identify and prioritize competitors before diving into detailed analysis.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{Provide high-level competitive insights, main threats and opportunities, and recommended strategic actions. Write this section LAST after completing all analysis.}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Analysis Scope & Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the primary purpose:
|
||||
|
||||
- New market entry assessment
|
||||
- Product positioning strategy
|
||||
- Feature gap analysis
|
||||
- Pricing strategy development
|
||||
- Partnership/acquisition targets
|
||||
- Competitive threat assessment}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitor Categories Analyzed
|
||||
|
||||
{{List categories included:
|
||||
|
||||
- Direct Competitors: Same product/service, same target market
|
||||
- Indirect Competitors: Different product, same need/problem
|
||||
- Potential Competitors: Could enter market easily
|
||||
- Substitute Products: Alternative solutions
|
||||
- Aspirational Competitors: Best-in-class examples}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe approach:
|
||||
|
||||
- Information sources used
|
||||
- Analysis timeframe
|
||||
- Confidence levels
|
||||
- Limitations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Structure
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the competitive environment:
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of active competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration (fragmented/consolidated)
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Recent market entries/exits}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitor Prioritization Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Help categorize competitors by market share and strategic threat level]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Create a 2x2 matrix:
|
||||
|
||||
- Priority 1 (Core Competitors): High Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 2 (Emerging Threats): Low Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 3 (Established Players): High Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
- Priority 4 (Monitor Only): Low Market Share + Low Threat}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Individual Competitor Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create detailed profiles for each Priority 1 and Priority 2 competitor. For Priority 3 and 4, create condensed profiles.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### {{Competitor Name}} - Priority {{1/2/3/4}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Company Overview
|
||||
|
||||
- **Founded:** {{Year, founders}}
|
||||
- **Headquarters:** {{Location}}
|
||||
- **Company Size:** {{Employees, revenue if known}}
|
||||
- **Funding:** {{Total raised, key investors}}
|
||||
- **Leadership:** {{Key executives}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Business Model & Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Revenue Model:** {{How they make money}}
|
||||
- **Target Market:** {{Primary customer segments}}
|
||||
- **Value Proposition:** {{Core value promise}}
|
||||
- **Go-to-Market Strategy:** {{Sales and marketing approach}}
|
||||
- **Strategic Focus:** {{Current priorities}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Product/Service Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
- **Core Offerings:** {{Main products/services}}
|
||||
- **Key Features:** {{Standout capabilities}}
|
||||
- **User Experience:** {{UX strengths/weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Technology Stack:** {{If relevant/known}}
|
||||
- **Pricing:** {{Model and price points}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strengths & Weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Strength 1}}
|
||||
- {{Strength 2}}
|
||||
- {{Strength 3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Weaknesses:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Weakness 1}}
|
||||
- {{Weakness 2}}
|
||||
- {{Weakness 3}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Market Position & Performance
|
||||
|
||||
- **Market Share:** {{Estimate if available}}
|
||||
- **Customer Base:** {{Size, notable clients}}
|
||||
- **Growth Trajectory:** {{Trending up/down/stable}}
|
||||
- **Recent Developments:** {{Key news, releases}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for each priority competitor>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparative Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a detailed comparison table of key features across competitors]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature Category | {{Your Company}} | {{Competitor 1}} | {{Competitor 2}} | {{Competitor 3}} |
|
||||
| --------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
|
||||
| **Core Functionality** |
|
||||
| Feature A | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} |
|
||||
| Feature B | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} | {{✓/✗/Partial}} |
|
||||
| **User Experience** |
|
||||
| Mobile App | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} | {{Rating/Status}} |
|
||||
| Onboarding Time | {{Time}} | {{Time}} | {{Time}} | {{Time}} |
|
||||
| **Integration & Ecosystem** |
|
||||
| API Availability | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} | {{Yes/No/Limited}} |
|
||||
| Third-party Integrations | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} | {{Number/Key ones}} |
|
||||
| **Pricing & Plans** |
|
||||
| Starting Price | {{$X}} | {{$X}} | {{$X}} | {{$X}} |
|
||||
| Free Tier | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} | {{Yes/No}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### SWOT Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create SWOT analysis for your solution vs. top competitors]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Your Solution
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strengths:** {{List key strengths}}
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** {{List key weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Opportunities:** {{List opportunities}}
|
||||
- **Threats:** {{List threats}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### vs. {{Main Competitor}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Competitive Advantages:** {{Where you're stronger}}
|
||||
- **Competitive Disadvantages:** {{Where they're stronger}}
|
||||
- **Differentiation Opportunities:** {{How to stand out}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning Map
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe competitor positions on key dimensions]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Create a positioning description using 2 key dimensions relevant to the market, such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- Price vs. Features
|
||||
- Ease of Use vs. Power
|
||||
- Specialization vs. Breadth
|
||||
- Self-Serve vs. High-Touch}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Advantages Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
#### Sustainable Advantages
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify moats and defensible positions:
|
||||
|
||||
- Network effects
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
- Brand strength
|
||||
- Technology barriers
|
||||
- Regulatory advantages}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Vulnerable Points
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where competitors could be challenged:
|
||||
|
||||
- Weak customer segments
|
||||
- Missing features
|
||||
- Poor user experience
|
||||
- High prices
|
||||
- Limited geographic presence}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Blue Ocean Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify uncontested market spaces]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{List opportunities to create new market space:
|
||||
|
||||
- Underserved segments
|
||||
- Unaddressed use cases
|
||||
- New business models
|
||||
- Geographic expansion
|
||||
- Different value propositions}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Differentiation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to position against competitors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Unique value propositions to emphasize
|
||||
- Features to prioritize
|
||||
- Segments to target
|
||||
- Messaging and positioning}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Response Planning
|
||||
|
||||
#### Offensive Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to gain market share:
|
||||
|
||||
- Target competitor weaknesses
|
||||
- Win competitive deals
|
||||
- Capture their customers}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Defensive Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{How to protect your position:
|
||||
|
||||
- Strengthen vulnerable areas
|
||||
- Build switching costs
|
||||
- Deepen customer relationships}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Partnership & Ecosystem Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Potential collaboration opportunities:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complementary players
|
||||
- Channel partners
|
||||
- Technology integrations
|
||||
- Strategic alliances}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring & Intelligence Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Competitors to Track
|
||||
|
||||
{{Priority list with rationale}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Monitoring Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
{{What to track:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product updates
|
||||
- Pricing changes
|
||||
- Customer wins/losses
|
||||
- Funding/M&A activity
|
||||
- Market messaging}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Intelligence Sources
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where to gather ongoing intelligence:
|
||||
|
||||
- Company websites/blogs
|
||||
- Customer reviews
|
||||
- Industry reports
|
||||
- Social media
|
||||
- Patent filings}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Update Cadence
|
||||
|
||||
{{Recommended review schedule:
|
||||
|
||||
- Weekly: {{What to check}}
|
||||
- Monthly: {{What to review}}
|
||||
- Quarterly: {{Deep analysis}}}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the document, offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for competitive analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Analysis Elicitation Actions** 0. Deep dive on a specific competitor's strategy
|
||||
|
||||
1. Analyze competitive dynamics in a specific segment
|
||||
2. War game competitive responses to your moves
|
||||
3. Explore partnership vs. competition scenarios
|
||||
4. Stress test differentiation claims
|
||||
5. Analyze disruption potential (yours or theirs)
|
||||
6. Compare to competition in adjacent markets
|
||||
7. Generate win/loss analysis insights
|
||||
8. If only we had known about [competitor X's plan]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on competitive analysis documents.]]
|
||||
293
bmad-core/templates/competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
293
bmad-core/templates/competitor-analysis-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: competitor-analysis-template-v2
|
||||
name: Competitive Analysis Report
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/competitor-analysis.md
|
||||
title: "Competitive Analysis Report: {{project_product_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Competitive Analysis Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Deep dive on a specific competitor's strategy"
|
||||
- "Analyze competitive dynamics in a specific segment"
|
||||
- "War game competitive responses to your moves"
|
||||
- "Explore partnership vs. competition scenarios"
|
||||
- "Stress test differentiation claims"
|
||||
- "Analyze disruption potential (yours or theirs)"
|
||||
- "Compare to competition in adjacent markets"
|
||||
- "Generate win/loss analysis insights"
|
||||
- "If only we had known about [competitor X's plan]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: Provide high-level competitive insights, main threats and opportunities, and recommended strategic actions. Write this section LAST after completing all analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: analysis-scope
|
||||
title: Analysis Scope & Methodology
|
||||
instruction: This template guides comprehensive competitor analysis. Start by understanding the user's competitive intelligence needs and strategic objectives. Help them identify and prioritize competitors before diving into detailed analysis.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: analysis-purpose
|
||||
title: Analysis Purpose
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the primary purpose:
|
||||
- New market entry assessment
|
||||
- Product positioning strategy
|
||||
- Feature gap analysis
|
||||
- Pricing strategy development
|
||||
- Partnership/acquisition targets
|
||||
- Competitive threat assessment
|
||||
- id: competitor-categories
|
||||
title: Competitor Categories Analyzed
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List categories included:
|
||||
- Direct Competitors: Same product/service, same target market
|
||||
- Indirect Competitors: Different product, same need/problem
|
||||
- Potential Competitors: Could enter market easily
|
||||
- Substitute Products: Alternative solutions
|
||||
- Aspirational Competitors: Best-in-class examples
|
||||
- id: research-methodology
|
||||
title: Research Methodology
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe approach:
|
||||
- Information sources used
|
||||
- Analysis timeframe
|
||||
- Confidence levels
|
||||
- Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitive-landscape
|
||||
title: Competitive Landscape Overview
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-structure
|
||||
title: Market Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the competitive environment:
|
||||
- Number of active competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration (fragmented/consolidated)
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Recent market entries/exits
|
||||
- id: prioritization-matrix
|
||||
title: Competitor Prioritization Matrix
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Help categorize competitors by market share and strategic threat level
|
||||
|
||||
Create a 2x2 matrix:
|
||||
- Priority 1 (Core Competitors): High Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 2 (Emerging Threats): Low Market Share + High Threat
|
||||
- Priority 3 (Established Players): High Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
- Priority 4 (Monitor Only): Low Market Share + Low Threat
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitor-profiles
|
||||
title: Individual Competitor Profiles
|
||||
instruction: Create detailed profiles for each Priority 1 and Priority 2 competitor. For Priority 3 and 4, create condensed profiles.
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: competitor
|
||||
title: "{{competitor_name}} - Priority {{priority_level}}"
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: company-overview
|
||||
title: Company Overview
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Founded:** {{year_founders}}
|
||||
- **Headquarters:** {{location}}
|
||||
- **Company Size:** {{employees_revenue}}
|
||||
- **Funding:** {{total_raised_investors}}
|
||||
- **Leadership:** {{key_executives}}
|
||||
- id: business-model
|
||||
title: Business Model & Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Revenue Model:** {{revenue_model}}
|
||||
- **Target Market:** {{customer_segments}}
|
||||
- **Value Proposition:** {{value_promise}}
|
||||
- **Go-to-Market Strategy:** {{gtm_approach}}
|
||||
- **Strategic Focus:** {{current_priorities}}
|
||||
- id: product-analysis
|
||||
title: Product/Service Analysis
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Core Offerings:** {{main_products}}
|
||||
- **Key Features:** {{standout_capabilities}}
|
||||
- **User Experience:** {{ux_assessment}}
|
||||
- **Technology Stack:** {{tech_stack}}
|
||||
- **Pricing:** {{pricing_model}}
|
||||
- id: strengths-weaknesses
|
||||
title: Strengths & Weaknesses
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: strengths
|
||||
title: Strengths
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{strength}}"
|
||||
- id: weaknesses
|
||||
title: Weaknesses
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{weakness}}"
|
||||
- id: market-position
|
||||
title: Market Position & Performance
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Market Share:** {{market_share_estimate}}
|
||||
- **Customer Base:** {{customer_size_notables}}
|
||||
- **Growth Trajectory:** {{growth_trend}}
|
||||
- **Recent Developments:** {{key_news}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: comparative-analysis
|
||||
title: Comparative Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: feature-comparison
|
||||
title: Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||||
instruction: Create a detailed comparison table of key features across competitors
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Feature Category", "{{your_company}}", "{{competitor_1}}", "{{competitor_2}}", "{{competitor_3}}"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- category: "Core Functionality"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Feature A", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}"]
|
||||
- ["Feature B", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}", "{{status}}"]
|
||||
- category: "User Experience"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Mobile App", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}", "{{rating}}"]
|
||||
- ["Onboarding Time", "{{time}}", "{{time}}", "{{time}}", "{{time}}"]
|
||||
- category: "Integration & Ecosystem"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["API Availability", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}", "{{availability}}"]
|
||||
- ["Third-party Integrations", "{{number}}", "{{number}}", "{{number}}", "{{number}}"]
|
||||
- category: "Pricing & Plans"
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- ["Starting Price", "{{price}}", "{{price}}", "{{price}}", "{{price}}"]
|
||||
- ["Free Tier", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}", "{{yes_no}}"]
|
||||
- id: swot-comparison
|
||||
title: SWOT Comparison
|
||||
instruction: Create SWOT analysis for your solution vs. top competitors
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: your-solution
|
||||
title: Your Solution
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Strengths:** {{strengths}}
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** {{weaknesses}}
|
||||
- **Opportunities:** {{opportunities}}
|
||||
- **Threats:** {{threats}}
|
||||
- id: vs-competitor
|
||||
title: "vs. {{main_competitor}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Competitive Advantages:** {{your_advantages}}
|
||||
- **Competitive Disadvantages:** {{their_advantages}}
|
||||
- **Differentiation Opportunities:** {{differentiation}}
|
||||
- id: positioning-map
|
||||
title: Positioning Map
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe competitor positions on key dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
Create a positioning description using 2 key dimensions relevant to the market, such as:
|
||||
- Price vs. Features
|
||||
- Ease of Use vs. Power
|
||||
- Specialization vs. Breadth
|
||||
- Self-Serve vs. High-Touch
|
||||
|
||||
- id: strategic-analysis
|
||||
title: Strategic Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: competitive-advantages
|
||||
title: Competitive Advantages Assessment
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: sustainable-advantages
|
||||
title: Sustainable Advantages
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify moats and defensible positions:
|
||||
- Network effects
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
- Brand strength
|
||||
- Technology barriers
|
||||
- Regulatory advantages
|
||||
- id: vulnerable-points
|
||||
title: Vulnerable Points
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Where competitors could be challenged:
|
||||
- Weak customer segments
|
||||
- Missing features
|
||||
- Poor user experience
|
||||
- High prices
|
||||
- Limited geographic presence
|
||||
- id: blue-ocean
|
||||
title: Blue Ocean Opportunities
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify uncontested market spaces
|
||||
|
||||
List opportunities to create new market space:
|
||||
- Underserved segments
|
||||
- Unaddressed use cases
|
||||
- New business models
|
||||
- Geographic expansion
|
||||
- Different value propositions
|
||||
|
||||
- id: strategic-recommendations
|
||||
title: Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: differentiation-strategy
|
||||
title: Differentiation Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to position against competitors:
|
||||
- Unique value propositions to emphasize
|
||||
- Features to prioritize
|
||||
- Segments to target
|
||||
- Messaging and positioning
|
||||
- id: competitive-response
|
||||
title: Competitive Response Planning
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: offensive-strategies
|
||||
title: Offensive Strategies
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to gain market share:
|
||||
- Target competitor weaknesses
|
||||
- Win competitive deals
|
||||
- Capture their customers
|
||||
- id: defensive-strategies
|
||||
title: Defensive Strategies
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
How to protect your position:
|
||||
- Strengthen vulnerable areas
|
||||
- Build switching costs
|
||||
- Deepen customer relationships
|
||||
- id: partnership-ecosystem
|
||||
title: Partnership & Ecosystem Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Potential collaboration opportunities:
|
||||
- Complementary players
|
||||
- Channel partners
|
||||
- Technology integrations
|
||||
- Strategic alliances
|
||||
|
||||
- id: monitoring-plan
|
||||
title: Monitoring & Intelligence Plan
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-competitors
|
||||
title: Key Competitors to Track
|
||||
instruction: Priority list with rationale
|
||||
- id: monitoring-metrics
|
||||
title: Monitoring Metrics
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
What to track:
|
||||
- Product updates
|
||||
- Pricing changes
|
||||
- Customer wins/losses
|
||||
- Funding/M&A activity
|
||||
- Market messaging
|
||||
- id: intelligence-sources
|
||||
title: Intelligence Sources
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Where to gather ongoing intelligence:
|
||||
- Company websites/blogs
|
||||
- Customer reviews
|
||||
- Industry reports
|
||||
- Social media
|
||||
- Patent filings
|
||||
- id: update-cadence
|
||||
title: Update Cadence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Recommended review schedule:
|
||||
- Weekly: {{weekly_items}}
|
||||
- Monthly: {{monthly_items}}
|
||||
- Quarterly: {{quarterly_analysis}}
|
||||
@@ -1,175 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Frontend Architecture Document
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/ui-architecture.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Review provided documents including PRD, UX-UI Specification, and main Architecture Document. Focus on extracting technical implementation details needed for AI frontend tools and developer agents. Ask the user for any of these documents if you are unable to locate and were not provided.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Template and Framework Selection
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before proceeding with frontend architecture design, check if the project is using a frontend starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD, main architecture document, and brainstorming brief for mentions of:
|
||||
|
||||
- Frontend starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vite, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- UI kit or component library starters
|
||||
- Existing frontend projects being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Admin dashboard templates or other specialized starters
|
||||
- Design system implementations
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a frontend starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-installed dependencies and versions
|
||||
- Folder structure and file organization
|
||||
- Built-in components and utilities
|
||||
- Styling approach (CSS modules, styled-components, Tailwind, etc.)
|
||||
- State management setup (if any)
|
||||
- Routing configuration
|
||||
- Testing setup and patterns
|
||||
- Build and development scripts
|
||||
|
||||
- Use this analysis to ensure your frontend architecture aligns with the starter's patterns
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no frontend starter is mentioned but this is a new UI, ensure we know what the ui language and framework is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Based on the framework choice, suggest appropriate starters:
|
||||
- React: Create React App, Next.js, Vite + React
|
||||
- Vue: Vue CLI, Nuxt.js, Vite + Vue
|
||||
- Angular: Angular CLI
|
||||
- Or suggest popular UI templates if applicable
|
||||
- Explain benefits specific to frontend development
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Note that all tooling, bundling, and configuration will need manual setup
|
||||
- Proceed with frontend architecture from scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Document the starter template decision and any constraints it imposes before proceeding.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Frontend Tech Stack
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Extract from main architecture's Technology Stack Table. This section MUST remain synchronized with the main architecture document. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Stack Table
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Technology | Version | Purpose | Rationale |
|
||||
| :-------------------- | :------------------- | :---------- | :---------- | :------------- |
|
||||
| **Framework** | {{framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **UI Library** | {{ui_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **State Management** | {{state_management}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Routing** | {{routing_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Build Tool** | {{build_tool}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Styling** | {{styling_solution}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Testing** | {{test_framework}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Component Library** | {{component_lib}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Form Handling** | {{form_library}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Animation** | {{animation_lib}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
| **Dev Tools** | {{dev_tools}} | {{version}} | {{purpose}} | {{why_chosen}} |
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Fill in appropriate technology choices based on the selected framework and project requirements.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define exact directory structure for AI tools based on the chosen framework. Be specific about where each type of file goes. Generate a structure that follows the framework's best practices and conventions. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define exact patterns for component creation based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate a minimal but complete component template following the framework's best practices. Include TypeScript types, proper imports, and basic structure.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide naming conventions specific to the chosen framework for components, files, services, state management, and other architectural elements.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define state management patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Store Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Generate the state management directory structure appropriate for the chosen framework and selected state management solution.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### State Management Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a basic state management template/example following the framework's recommended patterns. Include TypeScript types and common operations like setting, updating, and clearing state.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## API Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define API service patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Service Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide an API service template that follows the framework's conventions. Include proper TypeScript types, error handling, and async patterns.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### API Client Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Show how to configure the HTTP client for the chosen framework, including authentication interceptors/middleware and error handling.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Routing
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define routing structure and patterns based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Route Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide routing configuration appropriate for the chosen framework. Include protected route patterns, lazy loading where applicable, and authentication guards/middleware.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Styling Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define styling approach based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Styling Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe the styling methodology appropriate for the chosen framework (CSS Modules, Styled Components, Tailwind, etc.) and provide basic patterns.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Global Theme Variables
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a CSS custom properties (CSS variables) theme system that works across all frameworks. Include colors, spacing, typography, shadows, and dark mode support.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define minimal testing requirements based on the chosen framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Test Template
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Provide a basic component test template using the framework's recommended testing library. Include examples of rendering tests, user interaction tests, and mocking.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unit Tests**: Test individual components in isolation
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests**: Test component interactions
|
||||
3. **E2E Tests**: Test critical user flows (using Cypress/Playwright)
|
||||
4. **Coverage Goals**: Aim for 80% code coverage
|
||||
5. **Test Structure**: Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
|
||||
6. **Mock External Dependencies**: API calls, routing, state management
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List required environment variables based on the chosen framework. Show the appropriate format and naming conventions for the framework. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Frontend Developer Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Coding Rules
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: List essential rules that prevent common AI mistakes, including both universal rules and framework-specific ones. After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a framework-specific cheat sheet with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Common commands (dev server, build, test)
|
||||
- Key import patterns
|
||||
- File naming conventions
|
||||
- Project-specific patterns and utilities]]
|
||||
206
bmad-core/templates/front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
206
bmad-core/templates/front-end-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: frontend-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Frontend Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/ui-architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Frontend Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: template-framework-selection
|
||||
title: Template and Framework Selection
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Review provided documents including PRD, UX-UI Specification, and main Architecture Document. Focus on extracting technical implementation details needed for AI frontend tools and developer agents. Ask the user for any of these documents if you are unable to locate and were not provided.
|
||||
|
||||
Before proceeding with frontend architecture design, check if the project is using a frontend starter template or existing codebase:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD, main architecture document, and brainstorming brief for mentions of:
|
||||
- Frontend starter templates (e.g., Create React App, Next.js, Vite, Vue CLI, Angular CLI, etc.)
|
||||
- UI kit or component library starters
|
||||
- Existing frontend projects being used as a foundation
|
||||
- Admin dashboard templates or other specialized starters
|
||||
- Design system implementations
|
||||
|
||||
2. If a frontend starter template or existing project is mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access via one of these methods:
|
||||
- Link to the starter template documentation
|
||||
- Upload/attach the project files (for small projects)
|
||||
- Share a link to the project repository
|
||||
- Analyze the starter/existing project to understand:
|
||||
- Pre-installed dependencies and versions
|
||||
- Folder structure and file organization
|
||||
- Built-in components and utilities
|
||||
- Styling approach (CSS modules, styled-components, Tailwind, etc.)
|
||||
- State management setup (if any)
|
||||
- Routing configuration
|
||||
- Testing setup and patterns
|
||||
- Build and development scripts
|
||||
- Use this analysis to ensure your frontend architecture aligns with the starter's patterns
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no frontend starter is mentioned but this is a new UI, ensure we know what the ui language and framework is:
|
||||
- Based on the framework choice, suggest appropriate starters:
|
||||
- React: Create React App, Next.js, Vite + React
|
||||
- Vue: Vue CLI, Nuxt.js, Vite + Vue
|
||||
- Angular: Angular CLI
|
||||
- Or suggest popular UI templates if applicable
|
||||
- Explain benefits specific to frontend development
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the user confirms no starter template will be used:
|
||||
- Note that all tooling, bundling, and configuration will need manual setup
|
||||
- Proceed with frontend architecture from scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Document the starter template decision and any constraints it imposes before proceeding.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-tech-stack
|
||||
title: Frontend Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: Extract from main architecture's Technology Stack Table. This section MUST remain synchronized with the main architecture document.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
instruction: Fill in appropriate technology choices based on the selected framework and project requirements.
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Framework", "{{framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["UI Library", "{{ui_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["State Management", "{{state_management}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Routing", "{{routing_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Build Tool", "{{build_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Styling", "{{styling_solution}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Testing", "{{test_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Component Library", "{{component_lib}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Form Handling", "{{form_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Animation", "{{animation_lib}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Dev Tools", "{{dev_tools}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: project-structure
|
||||
title: Project Structure
|
||||
instruction: Define exact directory structure for AI tools based on the chosen framework. Be specific about where each type of file goes. Generate a structure that follows the framework's best practices and conventions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-standards
|
||||
title: Component Standards
|
||||
instruction: Define exact patterns for component creation based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-template
|
||||
title: Component Template
|
||||
instruction: Generate a minimal but complete component template following the framework's best practices. Include TypeScript types, proper imports, and basic structure.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
instruction: Provide naming conventions specific to the chosen framework for components, files, services, state management, and other architectural elements.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: state-management
|
||||
title: State Management
|
||||
instruction: Define state management patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: store-structure
|
||||
title: Store Structure
|
||||
instruction: Generate the state management directory structure appropriate for the chosen framework and selected state management solution.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
- id: state-template
|
||||
title: State Management Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide a basic state management template/example following the framework's recommended patterns. Include TypeScript types and common operations like setting, updating, and clearing state.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-integration
|
||||
title: API Integration
|
||||
instruction: Define API service patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: service-template
|
||||
title: Service Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide an API service template that follows the framework's conventions. Include proper TypeScript types, error handling, and async patterns.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: api-client-config
|
||||
title: API Client Configuration
|
||||
instruction: Show how to configure the HTTP client for the chosen framework, including authentication interceptors/middleware and error handling.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: routing
|
||||
title: Routing
|
||||
instruction: Define routing structure and patterns based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: route-configuration
|
||||
title: Route Configuration
|
||||
instruction: Provide routing configuration appropriate for the chosen framework. Include protected route patterns, lazy loading where applicable, and authentication guards/middleware.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
|
||||
- id: styling-guidelines
|
||||
title: Styling Guidelines
|
||||
instruction: Define styling approach based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: styling-approach
|
||||
title: Styling Approach
|
||||
instruction: Describe the styling methodology appropriate for the chosen framework (CSS Modules, Styled Components, Tailwind, etc.) and provide basic patterns.
|
||||
- id: global-theme
|
||||
title: Global Theme Variables
|
||||
instruction: Provide a CSS custom properties (CSS variables) theme system that works across all frameworks. Include colors, spacing, typography, shadows, and dark mode support.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: css
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-requirements
|
||||
title: Testing Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Define minimal testing requirements based on the chosen framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-test-template
|
||||
title: Component Test Template
|
||||
instruction: Provide a basic component test template using the framework's recommended testing library. Include examples of rendering tests, user interaction tests, and mocking.
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
- id: testing-best-practices
|
||||
title: Testing Best Practices
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- "**Unit Tests**: Test individual components in isolation"
|
||||
- "**Integration Tests**: Test component interactions"
|
||||
- "**E2E Tests**: Test critical user flows (using Cypress/Playwright)"
|
||||
- "**Coverage Goals**: Aim for 80% code coverage"
|
||||
- "**Test Structure**: Arrange-Act-Assert pattern"
|
||||
- "**Mock External Dependencies**: API calls, routing, state management"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: environment-configuration
|
||||
title: Environment Configuration
|
||||
instruction: List required environment variables based on the chosen framework. Show the appropriate format and naming conventions for the framework.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-developer-standards
|
||||
title: Frontend Developer Standards
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: critical-coding-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Coding Rules
|
||||
instruction: List essential rules that prevent common AI mistakes, including both universal rules and framework-specific ones.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
- id: quick-reference
|
||||
title: Quick Reference
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a framework-specific cheat sheet with:
|
||||
- Common commands (dev server, build, test)
|
||||
- Key import patterns
|
||||
- File naming conventions
|
||||
- Project-specific patterns and utilities
|
||||
@@ -1,413 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} UI/UX Specification
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/front-end-spec.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Review provided documents including Project Brief, PRD, and any user research to gather context. Focus on understanding user needs, pain points, and desired outcomes before beginning the specification.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Establish the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.]]
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the user experience goals, information architecture, user flows, and visual design specifications for {{Project Name}}'s user interface. It serves as the foundation for visual design and frontend development, ensuring a cohesive and user-centered experience.
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall UX Goals & Principles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Work with the user to establish and document the following. If not already defined, facilitate a discussion to determine:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Target User Personas - elicit details or confirm existing ones from PRD
|
||||
2. Key Usability Goals - understand what success looks like for users
|
||||
3. Core Design Principles - establish 3-5 guiding principles
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Target User Personas
|
||||
|
||||
{{persona_descriptions}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: personas}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power User:** Technical professionals who need advanced features and efficiency
|
||||
- **Casual User:** Occasional users who prioritize ease of use and clear guidance
|
||||
- **Administrator:** System managers who need control and oversight capabilities
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Usability Goals
|
||||
|
||||
{{usability_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: usability_goals}
|
||||
|
||||
- Ease of learning: New users can complete core tasks within 5 minutes
|
||||
- Efficiency of use: Power users can complete frequent tasks with minimal clicks
|
||||
- Error prevention: Clear validation and confirmation for destructive actions
|
||||
- Memorability: Infrequent users can return without relearning
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
{{design_principles}}
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: design_principles}
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Clarity over cleverness** - Prioritize clear communication over aesthetic innovation
|
||||
2. **Progressive disclosure** - Show only what's needed, when it's needed
|
||||
3. **Consistent patterns** - Use familiar UI patterns throughout the application
|
||||
4. **Immediate feedback** - Every action should have a clear, immediate response
|
||||
5. **Accessible by default** - Design for all users from the start
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Information Architecture (IA)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Collaborate with the user to create a comprehensive information architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Build a Site Map or Screen Inventory showing all major areas
|
||||
2. Define the Navigation Structure (primary, secondary, breadcrumbs)
|
||||
3. Use Mermaid diagrams for visual representation
|
||||
4. Consider user mental models and expected groupings
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Site Map / Screen Inventory
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{sitemap_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: sitemap}
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Homepage] --> B[Dashboard]
|
||||
A --> C[Products]
|
||||
A --> D[Account]
|
||||
B --> B1[Analytics]
|
||||
B --> B2[Recent Activity]
|
||||
C --> C1[Browse]
|
||||
C --> C2[Search]
|
||||
C --> C3[Product Details]
|
||||
D --> D1[Profile]
|
||||
D --> D2[Settings]
|
||||
D --> D3[Billing]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Navigation Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Navigation:** {{primary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Navigation:** {{secondary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Breadcrumb Strategy:** {{breadcrumb_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
## User Flows
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each critical user task identified in the PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define the user's goal clearly
|
||||
2. Map out all steps including decision points
|
||||
3. Consider edge cases and error states
|
||||
4. Use Mermaid flow diagrams for clarity
|
||||
5. Link to external tools (Figma/Miro) if detailed flows exist there
|
||||
|
||||
Create subsections for each major flow. After presenting all flows, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: user_flow>>
|
||||
|
||||
### {{flow_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**User Goal:** {{flow_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** {{entry_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** {{success_criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
{{flow_diagram}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Edge Cases & Error Handling:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{edge_case_1}}
|
||||
- {{edge_case_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Notes:** {{flow_notes}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: user_flow}
|
||||
|
||||
### User Registration
|
||||
|
||||
**User Goal:** Create a new account to access the platform
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** Homepage CTA, Login page link, Marketing landing pages
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** User successfully creates account and reaches dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
Start[Landing Page] --> Click[Click Sign Up]
|
||||
Click --> Form[Registration Form]
|
||||
Form --> Fill[Fill Required Fields]
|
||||
Fill --> Submit[Submit Form]
|
||||
Submit --> Validate{Valid?}
|
||||
Validate -->|No| Error[Show Errors]
|
||||
Error --> Form
|
||||
Validate -->|Yes| Verify[Email Verification]
|
||||
Verify --> Complete[Account Created]
|
||||
Complete --> Dashboard[Redirect to Dashboard]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Edge Cases & Error Handling:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Duplicate email: Show inline error with password recovery option
|
||||
- Weak password: Real-time feedback on password strength
|
||||
- Network error: Preserve form data and show retry option
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Wireframes & Mockups
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Clarify where detailed visual designs will be created (Figma, Sketch, etc.) and how to reference them. If low-fidelity wireframes are needed, offer to help conceptualize layouts for key screens.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Design Files:** {{design_tool_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Screen Layouts
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: screen_layout>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{screen_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{screen_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Elements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- {{element_1}}
|
||||
- {{element_2}}
|
||||
- {{element_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Notes:** {{interaction_notes}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Design File Reference:** {{specific_frame_link}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Library / Design System
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Discuss whether to use an existing design system or create a new one. If creating new, identify foundational components and their key states. Note that detailed technical specs belong in front-end-architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Design System Approach:** {{design_system_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Components
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: component>>
|
||||
|
||||
#### {{component_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{component_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** {{component_variants}}
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** {{component_states}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{usage_guidelines}}
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: component}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Button
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** Primary interaction element for user actions
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Destructive
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** Default, Hover, Active, Disabled, Loading
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use Primary for main CTAs (one per view)
|
||||
- Secondary for supporting actions
|
||||
- Destructive only for permanent deletions with confirmation
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
## Branding & Style Guide
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Link to existing style guide or define key brand elements. Ensure consistency with company brand guidelines if they exist.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Visual Identity
|
||||
|
||||
**Brand Guidelines:** {{brand_guidelines_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Color Palette
|
||||
|
||||
| Color Type | Hex Code | Usage |
|
||||
| :------------ | :------------------ | :------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Primary** | {{primary_color}} | {{primary_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Secondary** | {{secondary_color}} | {{secondary_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Accent** | {{accent_color}} | {{accent_usage}} |
|
||||
| **Success** | {{success_color}} | Positive feedback, confirmations |
|
||||
| **Warning** | {{warning_color}} | Cautions, important notices |
|
||||
| **Error** | {{error_color}} | Errors, destructive actions |
|
||||
| **Neutral** | {{neutral_colors}} | Text, borders, backgrounds |
|
||||
|
||||
### Typography
|
||||
|
||||
**Font Families:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary:** {{primary_font}}
|
||||
- **Secondary:** {{secondary_font}}
|
||||
- **Monospace:** {{mono_font}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Type Scale:**
|
||||
| Element | Size | Weight | Line Height |
|
||||
|:--------|:-----|:-------|:------------|
|
||||
| H1 | {{h1_size}} | {{h1_weight}} | {{h1_line}} |
|
||||
| H2 | {{h2_size}} | {{h2_weight}} | {{h2_line}} |
|
||||
| H3 | {{h3_size}} | {{h3_weight}} | {{h3_line}} |
|
||||
| Body | {{body_size}} | {{body_weight}} | {{body_line}} |
|
||||
| Small | {{small_size}} | {{small_weight}} | {{small_line}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Iconography
|
||||
|
||||
**Icon Library:** {{icon_library}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{icon_guidelines}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Spacing & Layout
|
||||
|
||||
**Grid System:** {{grid_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Spacing Scale:** {{spacing_scale}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Accessibility Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define specific accessibility requirements based on target compliance level and user needs. Be comprehensive but practical.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance Target
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard:** {{compliance_standard}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Visual:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Color contrast ratios: {{contrast_requirements}}
|
||||
- Focus indicators: {{focus_requirements}}
|
||||
- Text sizing: {{text_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation: {{keyboard_requirements}}
|
||||
- Screen reader support: {{screen_reader_requirements}}
|
||||
- Touch targets: {{touch_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Alternative text: {{alt_text_requirements}}
|
||||
- Heading structure: {{heading_requirements}}
|
||||
- Form labels: {{form_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{accessibility_testing}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Responsiveness Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define breakpoints and adaptation strategies for different device sizes. Consider both technical constraints and user contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Breakpoints
|
||||
|
||||
| Breakpoint | Min Width | Max Width | Target Devices |
|
||||
| :--------- | :-------------- | :-------------- | :------------------ |
|
||||
| Mobile | {{mobile_min}} | {{mobile_max}} | {{mobile_devices}} |
|
||||
| Tablet | {{tablet_min}} | {{tablet_max}} | {{tablet_devices}} |
|
||||
| Desktop | {{desktop_min}} | {{desktop_max}} | {{desktop_devices}} |
|
||||
| Wide | {{wide_min}} | - | {{wide_devices}} |
|
||||
|
||||
### Adaptation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Layout Changes:** {{layout_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Changes:** {{nav_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Priority:** {{content_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Changes:** {{interaction_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Animation & Micro-interactions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define motion design principles and key interactions. Keep performance and accessibility in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting this section, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Motion Principles
|
||||
|
||||
{{motion_principles}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Animations
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: animation>>
|
||||
|
||||
- **{{animation_name}}:** {{animation_description}} (Duration: {{duration}}, Easing: {{easing}})
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define performance goals and strategies that impact UX design decisions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Goals
|
||||
|
||||
- **Page Load:** {{load_time_goal}}
|
||||
- **Interaction Response:** {{interaction_goal}}
|
||||
- **Animation FPS:** {{animation_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{performance_strategies}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the UI/UX specification:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Recommend review with stakeholders
|
||||
2. Suggest creating/updating visual designs in design tool
|
||||
3. Prepare for handoff to Design Architect for frontend architecture
|
||||
4. Note any open questions or decisions needed]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. {{next_step_1}}
|
||||
2. {{next_step_2}}
|
||||
3. {{next_step_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Handoff Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All user flows documented
|
||||
- [ ] Component inventory complete
|
||||
- [ ] Accessibility requirements defined
|
||||
- [ ] Responsive strategy clear
|
||||
- [ ] Brand guidelines incorporated
|
||||
- [ ] Performance goals established
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If a UI/UX checklist exists, run it against this document and report results here.]]
|
||||
349
bmad-core/templates/front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
349
bmad-core/templates/front-end-spec-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: frontend-spec-template-v2
|
||||
name: UI/UX Specification
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/front-end-spec.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} UI/UX Specification"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Review provided documents including Project Brief, PRD, and any user research to gather context. Focus on understanding user needs, pain points, and desired outcomes before beginning the specification.
|
||||
|
||||
Establish the document's purpose and scope. Keep the content below but ensure project name is properly substituted.
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document defines the user experience goals, information architecture, user flows, and visual design specifications for {{project_name}}'s user interface. It serves as the foundation for visual design and frontend development, ensuring a cohesive and user-centered experience.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: ux-goals-principles
|
||||
title: Overall UX Goals & Principles
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Work with the user to establish and document the following. If not already defined, facilitate a discussion to determine:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Target User Personas - elicit details or confirm existing ones from PRD
|
||||
2. Key Usability Goals - understand what success looks like for users
|
||||
3. Core Design Principles - establish 3-5 guiding principles
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: user-personas
|
||||
title: Target User Personas
|
||||
template: "{{persona_descriptions}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Power User:** Technical professionals who need advanced features and efficiency"
|
||||
- "**Casual User:** Occasional users who prioritize ease of use and clear guidance"
|
||||
- "**Administrator:** System managers who need control and oversight capabilities"
|
||||
- id: usability-goals
|
||||
title: Usability Goals
|
||||
template: "{{usability_goals}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "Ease of learning: New users can complete core tasks within 5 minutes"
|
||||
- "Efficiency of use: Power users can complete frequent tasks with minimal clicks"
|
||||
- "Error prevention: Clear validation and confirmation for destructive actions"
|
||||
- "Memorability: Infrequent users can return without relearning"
|
||||
- id: design-principles
|
||||
title: Design Principles
|
||||
template: "{{design_principles}}"
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Clarity over cleverness** - Prioritize clear communication over aesthetic innovation"
|
||||
- "**Progressive disclosure** - Show only what's needed, when it's needed"
|
||||
- "**Consistent patterns** - Use familiar UI patterns throughout the application"
|
||||
- "**Immediate feedback** - Every action should have a clear, immediate response"
|
||||
- "**Accessible by default** - Design for all users from the start"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: information-architecture
|
||||
title: Information Architecture (IA)
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Collaborate with the user to create a comprehensive information architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Build a Site Map or Screen Inventory showing all major areas
|
||||
2. Define the Navigation Structure (primary, secondary, breadcrumbs)
|
||||
3. Use Mermaid diagrams for visual representation
|
||||
4. Consider user mental models and expected groupings
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: sitemap
|
||||
title: Site Map / Screen Inventory
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
template: "{{sitemap_diagram}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Homepage] --> B[Dashboard]
|
||||
A --> C[Products]
|
||||
A --> D[Account]
|
||||
B --> B1[Analytics]
|
||||
B --> B2[Recent Activity]
|
||||
C --> C1[Browse]
|
||||
C --> C2[Search]
|
||||
C --> C3[Product Details]
|
||||
D --> D1[Profile]
|
||||
D --> D2[Settings]
|
||||
D --> D3[Billing]
|
||||
- id: navigation-structure
|
||||
title: Navigation Structure
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Primary Navigation:** {{primary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Navigation:** {{secondary_nav_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Breadcrumb Strategy:** {{breadcrumb_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: user-flows
|
||||
title: User Flows
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each critical user task identified in the PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define the user's goal clearly
|
||||
2. Map out all steps including decision points
|
||||
3. Consider edge cases and error states
|
||||
4. Use Mermaid flow diagrams for clarity
|
||||
5. Link to external tools (Figma/Miro) if detailed flows exist there
|
||||
|
||||
Create subsections for each major flow.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: flow
|
||||
title: "{{flow_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**User Goal:** {{flow_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Entry Points:** {{entry_points}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:** {{success_criteria}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: flow-diagram
|
||||
title: Flow Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
template: "{{flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: edge-cases
|
||||
title: "Edge Cases & Error Handling:"
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{edge_case}}"
|
||||
- id: notes
|
||||
template: "**Notes:** {{flow_notes}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: wireframes-mockups
|
||||
title: Wireframes & Mockups
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Clarify where detailed visual designs will be created (Figma, Sketch, etc.) and how to reference them. If low-fidelity wireframes are needed, offer to help conceptualize layouts for key screens.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-files
|
||||
template: "**Primary Design Files:** {{design_tool_link}}"
|
||||
- id: key-screen-layouts
|
||||
title: Key Screen Layouts
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: screen
|
||||
title: "{{screen_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{screen_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Elements:**
|
||||
- {{element_1}}
|
||||
- {{element_2}}
|
||||
- {{element_3}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Notes:** {{interaction_notes}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Design File Reference:** {{specific_frame_link}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: component-library
|
||||
title: Component Library / Design System
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Discuss whether to use an existing design system or create a new one. If creating new, identify foundational components and their key states. Note that detailed technical specs belong in front-end-architecture.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: design-system-approach
|
||||
template: "**Design System Approach:** {{design_system_approach}}"
|
||||
- id: core-components
|
||||
title: Core Components
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{component_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Variants:** {{component_variants}}
|
||||
|
||||
**States:** {{component_states}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{usage_guidelines}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: branding-style
|
||||
title: Branding & Style Guide
|
||||
instruction: Link to existing style guide or define key brand elements. Ensure consistency with company brand guidelines if they exist.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: visual-identity
|
||||
title: Visual Identity
|
||||
template: "**Brand Guidelines:** {{brand_guidelines_link}}"
|
||||
- id: color-palette
|
||||
title: Color Palette
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Color Type", "Hex Code", "Usage"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Primary", "{{primary_color}}", "{{primary_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Secondary", "{{secondary_color}}", "{{secondary_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Accent", "{{accent_color}}", "{{accent_usage}}"]
|
||||
- ["Success", "{{success_color}}", "Positive feedback, confirmations"]
|
||||
- ["Warning", "{{warning_color}}", "Cautions, important notices"]
|
||||
- ["Error", "{{error_color}}", "Errors, destructive actions"]
|
||||
- ["Neutral", "{{neutral_colors}}", "Text, borders, backgrounds"]
|
||||
- id: typography
|
||||
title: Typography
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: font-families
|
||||
title: Font Families
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Primary:** {{primary_font}}
|
||||
- **Secondary:** {{secondary_font}}
|
||||
- **Monospace:** {{mono_font}}
|
||||
- id: type-scale
|
||||
title: Type Scale
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Element", "Size", "Weight", "Line Height"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["H1", "{{h1_size}}", "{{h1_weight}}", "{{h1_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["H2", "{{h2_size}}", "{{h2_weight}}", "{{h2_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["H3", "{{h3_size}}", "{{h3_weight}}", "{{h3_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["Body", "{{body_size}}", "{{body_weight}}", "{{body_line}}"]
|
||||
- ["Small", "{{small_size}}", "{{small_weight}}", "{{small_line}}"]
|
||||
- id: iconography
|
||||
title: Iconography
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Icon Library:** {{icon_library}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage Guidelines:** {{icon_guidelines}}
|
||||
- id: spacing-layout
|
||||
title: Spacing & Layout
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Grid System:** {{grid_system}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Spacing Scale:** {{spacing_scale}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: accessibility
|
||||
title: Accessibility Requirements
|
||||
instruction: Define specific accessibility requirements based on target compliance level and user needs. Be comprehensive but practical.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: compliance-target
|
||||
title: Compliance Target
|
||||
template: "**Standard:** {{compliance_standard}}"
|
||||
- id: key-requirements
|
||||
title: Key Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Visual:**
|
||||
- Color contrast ratios: {{contrast_requirements}}
|
||||
- Focus indicators: {{focus_requirements}}
|
||||
- Text sizing: {{text_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction:**
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation: {{keyboard_requirements}}
|
||||
- Screen reader support: {{screen_reader_requirements}}
|
||||
- Touch targets: {{touch_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content:**
|
||||
- Alternative text: {{alt_text_requirements}}
|
||||
- Heading structure: {{heading_requirements}}
|
||||
- Form labels: {{form_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
template: "{{accessibility_testing}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: responsiveness
|
||||
title: Responsiveness Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define breakpoints and adaptation strategies for different device sizes. Consider both technical constraints and user contexts.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: breakpoints
|
||||
title: Breakpoints
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: ["Breakpoint", "Min Width", "Max Width", "Target Devices"]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Mobile", "{{mobile_min}}", "{{mobile_max}}", "{{mobile_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Tablet", "{{tablet_min}}", "{{tablet_max}}", "{{tablet_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Desktop", "{{desktop_min}}", "{{desktop_max}}", "{{desktop_devices}}"]
|
||||
- ["Wide", "{{wide_min}}", "-", "{{wide_devices}}"]
|
||||
- id: adaptation-patterns
|
||||
title: Adaptation Patterns
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Layout Changes:** {{layout_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Changes:** {{nav_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Priority:** {{content_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Changes:** {{interaction_adaptations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: animation
|
||||
title: Animation & Micro-interactions
|
||||
instruction: Define motion design principles and key interactions. Keep performance and accessibility in mind.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: motion-principles
|
||||
title: Motion Principles
|
||||
template: "{{motion_principles}}"
|
||||
- id: key-animations
|
||||
title: Key Animations
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{animation_name}}:** {{animation_description}} (Duration: {{duration}}, Easing: {{easing}})"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: performance
|
||||
title: Performance Considerations
|
||||
instruction: Define performance goals and strategies that impact UX design decisions.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: performance-goals
|
||||
title: Performance Goals
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Page Load:** {{load_time_goal}}
|
||||
- **Interaction Response:** {{interaction_goal}}
|
||||
- **Animation FPS:** {{animation_goal}}
|
||||
- id: design-strategies
|
||||
title: Design Strategies
|
||||
template: "{{performance_strategies}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
After completing the UI/UX specification:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Recommend review with stakeholders
|
||||
2. Suggest creating/updating visual designs in design tool
|
||||
3. Prepare for handoff to Design Architect for frontend architecture
|
||||
4. Note any open questions or decisions needed
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-actions
|
||||
title: Immediate Actions
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{action}}"
|
||||
- id: design-handoff-checklist
|
||||
title: Design Handoff Checklist
|
||||
type: checklist
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- "All user flows documented"
|
||||
- "Component inventory complete"
|
||||
- "Accessibility requirements defined"
|
||||
- "Responsive strategy clear"
|
||||
- "Brand guidelines incorporated"
|
||||
- "Performance goals established"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results
|
||||
instruction: If a UI/UX checklist exists, run it against this document and report results here.
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
805
bmad-core/templates/fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
805
bmad-core/templates/fullstack-architecture-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,805 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: fullstack-architecture-template-v2
|
||||
name: Fullstack Architecture Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/architecture.md
|
||||
title: "{{project_name}} Fullstack Architecture Document"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
title: Introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If available, review any provided relevant documents to gather all relevant context before beginning. At minimum, you should have access to docs/prd.md and docs/front-end-spec.md. Ask the user for any documents you need but cannot locate. This template creates a unified architecture that covers both backend and frontend concerns to guide AI-driven fullstack development.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This document outlines the complete fullstack architecture for {{project_name}}, including backend systems, frontend implementation, and their integration. It serves as the single source of truth for AI-driven development, ensuring consistency across the entire technology stack.
|
||||
|
||||
This unified approach combines what would traditionally be separate backend and frontend architecture documents, streamlining the development process for modern fullstack applications where these concerns are increasingly intertwined.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: starter-template
|
||||
title: Starter Template or Existing Project
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Before proceeding with architecture design, check if the project is based on any starter templates or existing codebases:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and other documents for mentions of:
|
||||
- Fullstack starter templates (e.g., T3 Stack, MEAN/MERN starters, Django + React templates)
|
||||
- Monorepo templates (e.g., Nx, Turborepo starters)
|
||||
- Platform-specific starters (e.g., Vercel templates, AWS Amplify starters)
|
||||
- Existing projects being extended or cloned
|
||||
|
||||
2. If starter templates or existing projects are mentioned:
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access (links, repos, or files)
|
||||
- Analyze to understand pre-configured choices and constraints
|
||||
- Note any architectural decisions already made
|
||||
- Identify what can be modified vs what must be retained
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter is mentioned but this is greenfield:
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate fullstack starters based on tech preferences
|
||||
- Consider platform-specific options (Vercel, AWS, etc.)
|
||||
- Let user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. Document the decision and any constraints it imposes
|
||||
|
||||
If none, state "N/A - Greenfield project"
|
||||
- id: changelog
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track document versions and changes
|
||||
|
||||
- id: high-level-architecture
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture
|
||||
instruction: This section contains multiple subsections that establish the foundation. Present all subsections together, then elicit feedback on the complete section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: technical-summary
|
||||
title: Technical Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Provide a comprehensive overview (4-6 sentences) covering:
|
||||
- Overall architectural style and deployment approach
|
||||
- Frontend framework and backend technology choices
|
||||
- Key integration points between frontend and backend
|
||||
- Infrastructure platform and services
|
||||
- How this architecture achieves PRD goals
|
||||
- id: platform-infrastructure
|
||||
title: Platform and Infrastructure Choice
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on PRD requirements and technical assumptions, make a platform recommendation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Consider common patterns (not an exhaustive list, use your own best judgement and search the web as needed for emerging trends):
|
||||
- **Vercel + Supabase**: For rapid development with Next.js, built-in auth/storage
|
||||
- **AWS Full Stack**: For enterprise scale with Lambda, API Gateway, S3, Cognito
|
||||
- **Azure**: For .NET ecosystems or enterprise Microsoft environments
|
||||
- **Google Cloud**: For ML/AI heavy applications or Google ecosystem integration
|
||||
|
||||
2. Present 2-3 viable options with clear pros/cons
|
||||
3. Make a recommendation with rationale
|
||||
4. Get explicit user confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Document the choice and key services that will be used.
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Platform:** {{selected_platform}}
|
||||
**Key Services:** {{core_services_list}}
|
||||
**Deployment Host and Regions:** {{regions}}
|
||||
- id: repository-structure
|
||||
title: Repository Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the repository approach based on PRD requirements and platform choice, explain your rationale or ask questions to the user if unsure:
|
||||
|
||||
1. For modern fullstack apps, monorepo is often preferred
|
||||
2. Consider tooling (Nx, Turborepo, Lerna, npm workspaces)
|
||||
3. Define package/app boundaries
|
||||
4. Plan for shared code between frontend and backend
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Structure:** {{repo_structure_choice}}
|
||||
**Monorepo Tool:** {{monorepo_tool_if_applicable}}
|
||||
**Package Organization:** {{package_strategy}}
|
||||
- id: architecture-diagram
|
||||
title: High Level Architecture Diagram
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: graph
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a Mermaid diagram showing the complete system architecture including:
|
||||
- User entry points (web, mobile)
|
||||
- Frontend application deployment
|
||||
- API layer (REST/GraphQL)
|
||||
- Backend services
|
||||
- Databases and storage
|
||||
- External integrations
|
||||
- CDN and caching layers
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate diagram type for clarity.
|
||||
- id: architectural-patterns
|
||||
title: Architectural Patterns
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List patterns that will guide both frontend and backend development. Include patterns for:
|
||||
- Overall architecture (e.g., Jamstack, Serverless, Microservices)
|
||||
- Frontend patterns (e.g., Component-based, State management)
|
||||
- Backend patterns (e.g., Repository, CQRS, Event-driven)
|
||||
- Integration patterns (e.g., BFF, API Gateway)
|
||||
|
||||
For each pattern, provide recommendation and rationale.
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{pattern_name}}:** {{pattern_description}} - _Rationale:_ {{rationale}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Jamstack Architecture:** Static site generation with serverless APIs - _Rationale:_ Optimal performance and scalability for content-heavy applications"
|
||||
- "**Component-Based UI:** Reusable React components with TypeScript - _Rationale:_ Maintainability and type safety across large codebases"
|
||||
- "**Repository Pattern:** Abstract data access logic - _Rationale:_ Enables testing and future database migration flexibility"
|
||||
- "**API Gateway Pattern:** Single entry point for all API calls - _Rationale:_ Centralized auth, rate limiting, and monitoring"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tech-stack
|
||||
title: Tech Stack
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This is the DEFINITIVE technology selection for the entire project. Work with user to finalize all choices. This table is the single source of truth - all development must use these exact versions.
|
||||
|
||||
Key areas to cover:
|
||||
- Frontend and backend languages/frameworks
|
||||
- Databases and caching
|
||||
- Authentication and authorization
|
||||
- API approach
|
||||
- Testing tools for both frontend and backend
|
||||
- Build and deployment tools
|
||||
- Monitoring and logging
|
||||
|
||||
Upon render, elicit feedback immediately.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tech-stack-table
|
||||
title: Technology Stack Table
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Category, Technology, Version, Purpose, Rationale]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Frontend Language", "{{fe_language}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Frontend Framework", "{{fe_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["UI Component Library", "{{ui_library}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["State Management", "{{state_mgmt}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Language", "{{be_language}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Framework", "{{be_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["API Style", "{{api_style}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Database", "{{database}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Cache", "{{cache}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["File Storage", "{{storage}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Authentication", "{{auth}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Frontend Testing", "{{fe_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Backend Testing", "{{be_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["E2E Testing", "{{e2e_test}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Build Tool", "{{build_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Bundler", "{{bundler}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["IaC Tool", "{{iac_tool}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["CI/CD", "{{cicd}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Monitoring", "{{monitoring}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["Logging", "{{logging}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
- ["CSS Framework", "{{css_framework}}", "{{version}}", "{{purpose}}", "{{why_chosen}}"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: data-models
|
||||
title: Data Models
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the core data models/entities that will be shared between frontend and backend:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review PRD requirements and identify key business entities
|
||||
2. For each model, explain its purpose and relationships
|
||||
3. Include key attributes and data types
|
||||
4. Show relationships between models
|
||||
5. Create TypeScript interfaces that can be shared
|
||||
6. Discuss design decisions with user
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear conceptual model before moving to database schema.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: model
|
||||
title: "{{model_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Purpose:** {{model_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Attributes:**
|
||||
- {{attribute_1}}: {{type_1}} - {{description_1}}
|
||||
- {{attribute_2}}: {{type_2}} - {{description_2}}
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: typescript-interface
|
||||
title: TypeScript Interface
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{model_interface}}"
|
||||
- id: relationships
|
||||
title: Relationships
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{relationship}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: api-spec
|
||||
title: API Specification
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the chosen API style from Tech Stack:
|
||||
|
||||
1. If REST API, create an OpenAPI 3.0 specification
|
||||
2. If GraphQL, provide the GraphQL schema
|
||||
3. If tRPC, show router definitions
|
||||
4. Include all endpoints from epics/stories
|
||||
5. Define request/response schemas based on data models
|
||||
6. Document authentication requirements
|
||||
7. Include example requests/responses
|
||||
|
||||
Use appropriate format for the chosen API style. If no API (e.g., static site), skip this section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: rest-api
|
||||
title: REST API Specification
|
||||
condition: API style is REST
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.0
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title: {{api_title}}
|
||||
version: {{api_version}}
|
||||
description: {{api_description}}
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: {{server_url}}
|
||||
description: {{server_description}}
|
||||
- id: graphql-api
|
||||
title: GraphQL Schema
|
||||
condition: API style is GraphQL
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: graphql
|
||||
template: "{{graphql_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: trpc-api
|
||||
title: tRPC Router Definitions
|
||||
condition: API style is tRPC
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{trpc_routers}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: components
|
||||
title: Components
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on the architectural patterns, tech stack, and data models from above:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify major logical components/services across the fullstack
|
||||
2. Consider both frontend and backend components
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-list
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
title: "{{component_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Responsibility:** {{component_description}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Interfaces:**
|
||||
- {{interface_1}}
|
||||
- {{interface_2}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependencies:** {{dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack:** {{component_tech_details}}
|
||||
- id: component-diagrams
|
||||
title: Component Diagrams
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create Mermaid diagrams to visualize component relationships. Options:
|
||||
- C4 Container diagram for high-level view
|
||||
- Component diagram for detailed internal structure
|
||||
- Sequence diagrams for complex interactions
|
||||
Choose the most appropriate for clarity
|
||||
|
||||
- id: external-apis
|
||||
title: External APIs
|
||||
condition: Project requires external API integrations
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For each external service integration:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify APIs needed based on PRD requirements and component design
|
||||
2. If documentation URLs are unknown, ask user for specifics
|
||||
3. Document authentication methods and security considerations
|
||||
4. List specific endpoints that will be used
|
||||
5. Note any rate limits or usage constraints
|
||||
|
||||
If no external APIs are needed, state this explicitly and skip to next section.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api
|
||||
title: "{{api_name}} API"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Purpose:** {{api_purpose}}
|
||||
- **Documentation:** {{api_docs_url}}
|
||||
- **Base URL(s):** {{api_base_url}}
|
||||
- **Authentication:** {{auth_method}}
|
||||
- **Rate Limits:** {{rate_limits}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Endpoints Used:**
|
||||
- `{{method}} {{endpoint_path}}` - {{endpoint_purpose}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Notes:** {{integration_considerations}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: core-workflows
|
||||
title: Core Workflows
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Illustrate key system workflows using sequence diagrams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify critical user journeys from PRD
|
||||
2. Show component interactions including external APIs
|
||||
3. Include both frontend and backend flows
|
||||
4. Include error handling paths
|
||||
5. Document async operations
|
||||
6. Create both high-level and detailed diagrams as needed
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on workflows that clarify architecture decisions or complex interactions.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: database-schema
|
||||
title: Database Schema
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Transform the conceptual data models into concrete database schemas:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use the database type(s) selected in Tech Stack
|
||||
2. Create schema definitions using appropriate notation
|
||||
3. Include indexes, constraints, and relationships
|
||||
4. Consider performance and scalability
|
||||
5. For NoSQL, show document structures
|
||||
|
||||
Present schema in format appropriate to database type (SQL DDL, JSON schema, etc.)
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
|
||||
- id: frontend-architecture
|
||||
title: Frontend Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define frontend-specific architecture details. After each subsection, note if user wants to refine before continuing.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-architecture
|
||||
title: Component Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define component organization and patterns based on chosen framework.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: component-organization
|
||||
title: Component Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{component_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: component-template
|
||||
title: Component Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{component_template}}"
|
||||
- id: state-management
|
||||
title: State Management Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Detail state management approach based on chosen solution.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: state-structure
|
||||
title: State Structure
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{state_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: state-patterns
|
||||
title: State Management Patterns
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{pattern}}"
|
||||
- id: routing-architecture
|
||||
title: Routing Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define routing structure based on framework choice.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: route-organization
|
||||
title: Route Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{route_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: protected-routes
|
||||
title: Protected Route Pattern
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{protected_route_example}}"
|
||||
- id: frontend-services
|
||||
title: Frontend Services Layer
|
||||
instruction: Define how frontend communicates with backend.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: api-client-setup
|
||||
title: API Client Setup
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{api_client_setup}}"
|
||||
- id: service-example
|
||||
title: Service Example
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{service_example}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: backend-architecture
|
||||
title: Backend Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define backend-specific architecture details. Consider serverless vs traditional server approaches.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: service-architecture
|
||||
title: Service Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Based on platform choice, define service organization.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: serverless-architecture
|
||||
condition: Serverless architecture chosen
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: function-organization
|
||||
title: Function Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{function_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: function-template
|
||||
title: Function Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{function_template}}"
|
||||
- id: traditional-server
|
||||
condition: Traditional server architecture chosen
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: controller-organization
|
||||
title: Controller/Route Organization
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{controller_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: controller-template
|
||||
title: Controller Template
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{controller_template}}"
|
||||
- id: database-architecture
|
||||
title: Database Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define database schema and access patterns.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: schema-design
|
||||
title: Schema Design
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: sql
|
||||
template: "{{database_schema}}"
|
||||
- id: data-access-layer
|
||||
title: Data Access Layer
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{repository_pattern}}"
|
||||
- id: auth-architecture
|
||||
title: Authentication and Authorization
|
||||
instruction: Define auth implementation details.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: auth-flow
|
||||
title: Auth Flow
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
template: "{{auth_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: auth-middleware
|
||||
title: Middleware/Guards
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{auth_middleware}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: unified-project-structure
|
||||
title: Unified Project Structure
|
||||
instruction: Create a monorepo structure that accommodates both frontend and backend. Adapt based on chosen tools and frameworks.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: plaintext
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
{{project-name}}/
|
||||
├── .github/ # CI/CD workflows
|
||||
│ └── workflows/
|
||||
│ ├── ci.yaml
|
||||
│ └── deploy.yaml
|
||||
├── apps/ # Application packages
|
||||
│ ├── web/ # Frontend application
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── components/ # UI components
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── pages/ # Page components/routes
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── hooks/ # Custom React hooks
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── services/ # API client services
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── stores/ # State management
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── styles/ # Global styles/themes
|
||||
│ │ │ └── utils/ # Frontend utilities
|
||||
│ │ ├── public/ # Static assets
|
||||
│ │ ├── tests/ # Frontend tests
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ └── api/ # Backend application
|
||||
│ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ ├── routes/ # API routes/controllers
|
||||
│ │ ├── services/ # Business logic
|
||||
│ │ ├── models/ # Data models
|
||||
│ │ ├── middleware/ # Express/API middleware
|
||||
│ │ ├── utils/ # Backend utilities
|
||||
│ │ └── {{serverless_or_server_entry}}
|
||||
│ ├── tests/ # Backend tests
|
||||
│ └── package.json
|
||||
├── packages/ # Shared packages
|
||||
│ ├── shared/ # Shared types/utilities
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── types/ # TypeScript interfaces
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── constants/ # Shared constants
|
||||
│ │ │ └── utils/ # Shared utilities
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ ├── ui/ # Shared UI components
|
||||
│ │ ├── src/
|
||||
│ │ └── package.json
|
||||
│ └── config/ # Shared configuration
|
||||
│ ├── eslint/
|
||||
│ ├── typescript/
|
||||
│ └── jest/
|
||||
├── infrastructure/ # IaC definitions
|
||||
│ └── {{iac_structure}}
|
||||
├── scripts/ # Build/deploy scripts
|
||||
├── docs/ # Documentation
|
||||
│ ├── prd.md
|
||||
│ ├── front-end-spec.md
|
||||
│ └── fullstack-architecture.md
|
||||
├── .env.example # Environment template
|
||||
├── package.json # Root package.json
|
||||
├── {{monorepo_config}} # Monorepo configuration
|
||||
└── README.md
|
||||
|
||||
- id: development-workflow
|
||||
title: Development Workflow
|
||||
instruction: Define the development setup and workflow for the fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: local-setup
|
||||
title: Local Development Setup
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: prerequisites
|
||||
title: Prerequisites
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: "{{prerequisites_commands}}"
|
||||
- id: initial-setup
|
||||
title: Initial Setup
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: "{{setup_commands}}"
|
||||
- id: dev-commands
|
||||
title: Development Commands
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
# Start all services
|
||||
{{start_all_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Start frontend only
|
||||
{{start_frontend_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Start backend only
|
||||
{{start_backend_command}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Run tests
|
||||
{{test_commands}}
|
||||
- id: environment-config
|
||||
title: Environment Configuration
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: env-vars
|
||||
title: Required Environment Variables
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: bash
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
# Frontend (.env.local)
|
||||
{{frontend_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Backend (.env)
|
||||
{{backend_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Shared
|
||||
{{shared_env_vars}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: deployment-architecture
|
||||
title: Deployment Architecture
|
||||
instruction: Define deployment strategy based on platform choice.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: deployment-strategy
|
||||
title: Deployment Strategy
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Deployment:**
|
||||
- **Platform:** {{frontend_deploy_platform}}
|
||||
- **Build Command:** {{frontend_build_command}}
|
||||
- **Output Directory:** {{frontend_output_dir}}
|
||||
- **CDN/Edge:** {{cdn_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Deployment:**
|
||||
- **Platform:** {{backend_deploy_platform}}
|
||||
- **Build Command:** {{backend_build_command}}
|
||||
- **Deployment Method:** {{deployment_method}}
|
||||
- id: cicd-pipeline
|
||||
title: CI/CD Pipeline
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: yaml
|
||||
template: "{{cicd_pipeline_config}}"
|
||||
- id: environments
|
||||
title: Environments
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Environment, Frontend URL, Backend URL, Purpose]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Development", "{{dev_fe_url}}", "{{dev_be_url}}", "Local development"]
|
||||
- ["Staging", "{{staging_fe_url}}", "{{staging_be_url}}", "Pre-production testing"]
|
||||
- ["Production", "{{prod_fe_url}}", "{{prod_be_url}}", "Live environment"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: security-performance
|
||||
title: Security and Performance
|
||||
instruction: Define security and performance considerations for the fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: security-requirements
|
||||
title: Security Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Security:**
|
||||
- CSP Headers: {{csp_policy}}
|
||||
- XSS Prevention: {{xss_strategy}}
|
||||
- Secure Storage: {{storage_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Security:**
|
||||
- Input Validation: {{validation_approach}}
|
||||
- Rate Limiting: {{rate_limit_config}}
|
||||
- CORS Policy: {{cors_config}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Authentication Security:**
|
||||
- Token Storage: {{token_strategy}}
|
||||
- Session Management: {{session_approach}}
|
||||
- Password Policy: {{password_requirements}}
|
||||
- id: performance-optimization
|
||||
title: Performance Optimization
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Performance:**
|
||||
- Bundle Size Target: {{bundle_size}}
|
||||
- Loading Strategy: {{loading_approach}}
|
||||
- Caching Strategy: {{fe_cache_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Performance:**
|
||||
- Response Time Target: {{response_target}}
|
||||
- Database Optimization: {{db_optimization}}
|
||||
- Caching Strategy: {{be_cache_strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: testing-strategy
|
||||
title: Testing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define comprehensive testing approach for fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-pyramid
|
||||
title: Testing Pyramid
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
E2E Tests
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
Integration Tests
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
Frontend Unit Backend Unit
|
||||
- id: test-organization
|
||||
title: Test Organization
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: frontend-tests
|
||||
title: Frontend Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-tests
|
||||
title: Backend Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{backend_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: e2e-tests
|
||||
title: E2E Tests
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: text
|
||||
template: "{{e2e_test_structure}}"
|
||||
- id: test-examples
|
||||
title: Test Examples
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: frontend-test
|
||||
title: Frontend Component Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_test_example}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-test
|
||||
title: Backend API Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{backend_test_example}}"
|
||||
- id: e2e-test
|
||||
title: E2E Test
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{e2e_test_example}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: coding-standards
|
||||
title: Coding Standards
|
||||
instruction: Define MINIMAL but CRITICAL standards for AI agents. Focus only on project-specific rules that prevent common mistakes. These will be used by dev agents.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: critical-rules
|
||||
title: Critical Fullstack Rules
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
template: "- **{{rule_name}}:** {{rule_description}}"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- "**Type Sharing:** Always define types in packages/shared and import from there"
|
||||
- "**API Calls:** Never make direct HTTP calls - use the service layer"
|
||||
- "**Environment Variables:** Access only through config objects, never process.env directly"
|
||||
- "**Error Handling:** All API routes must use the standard error handler"
|
||||
- "**State Updates:** Never mutate state directly - use proper state management patterns"
|
||||
- id: naming-conventions
|
||||
title: Naming Conventions
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Element, Frontend, Backend, Example]
|
||||
rows:
|
||||
- ["Components", "PascalCase", "-", "`UserProfile.tsx`"]
|
||||
- ["Hooks", "camelCase with 'use'", "-", "`useAuth.ts`"]
|
||||
- ["API Routes", "-", "kebab-case", "`/api/user-profile`"]
|
||||
- ["Database Tables", "-", "snake_case", "`user_profiles`"]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: error-handling
|
||||
title: Error Handling Strategy
|
||||
instruction: Define unified error handling across frontend and backend.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: error-flow
|
||||
title: Error Flow
|
||||
type: mermaid
|
||||
mermaid_type: sequence
|
||||
template: "{{error_flow_diagram}}"
|
||||
- id: error-format
|
||||
title: Error Response Format
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
interface ApiError {
|
||||
error: {
|
||||
code: string;
|
||||
message: string;
|
||||
details?: Record<string, any>;
|
||||
timestamp: string;
|
||||
requestId: string;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
- id: frontend-error-handling
|
||||
title: Frontend Error Handling
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{frontend_error_handler}}"
|
||||
- id: backend-error-handling
|
||||
title: Backend Error Handling
|
||||
type: code
|
||||
language: typescript
|
||||
template: "{{backend_error_handler}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: monitoring
|
||||
title: Monitoring and Observability
|
||||
instruction: Define monitoring strategy for fullstack application.
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: monitoring-stack
|
||||
title: Monitoring Stack
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Frontend Monitoring:** {{frontend_monitoring}}
|
||||
- **Backend Monitoring:** {{backend_monitoring}}
|
||||
- **Error Tracking:** {{error_tracking}}
|
||||
- **Performance Monitoring:** {{perf_monitoring}}
|
||||
- id: key-metrics
|
||||
title: Key Metrics
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**Frontend Metrics:**
|
||||
- Core Web Vitals
|
||||
- JavaScript errors
|
||||
- API response times
|
||||
- User interactions
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Metrics:**
|
||||
- Request rate
|
||||
- Error rate
|
||||
- Response time
|
||||
- Database query performance
|
||||
|
||||
- id: checklist-results
|
||||
title: Checklist Results Report
|
||||
instruction: Before running the checklist, offer to output the full architecture document. Once user confirms, execute the architect-checklist and populate results here.
|
||||
@@ -1,263 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Report: {{Project/Product Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/market-research.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides the creation of a comprehensive market research report. Begin by understanding what market insights the user needs and why. Work through each section systematically, using the appropriate analytical frameworks based on the research objectives.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{Provide a high-level overview of key findings, market opportunity assessment, and strategic recommendations. Write this section LAST after completing all other sections.}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Objectives & Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
{{List the primary objectives of this market research:
|
||||
|
||||
- What decisions will this research inform?
|
||||
- What specific questions need to be answered?
|
||||
- What are the success criteria for this research?}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the research approach:
|
||||
|
||||
- Data sources used (primary/secondary)
|
||||
- Analysis frameworks applied
|
||||
- Data collection timeframe
|
||||
- Limitations and assumptions}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Definition
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the market being analyzed:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product/service category
|
||||
- Geographic scope
|
||||
- Customer segments included
|
||||
- Value chain position}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size & Growth
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Guide through TAM, SAM, SOM calculations with clear assumptions. Use one or more approaches:
|
||||
|
||||
- Top-down: Start with industry data, narrow down
|
||||
- Bottom-up: Build from customer/unit economics
|
||||
- Value theory: Based on value provided vs. alternatives]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Total Addressable Market (TAM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Calculate and explain the total market opportunity}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define the portion of TAM you can realistically reach}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
|
||||
|
||||
{{Estimate the portion you can realistically capture}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Trends & Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze key trends shaping the market using appropriate frameworks like PESTEL]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Key Market Trends
|
||||
|
||||
{{List and explain 3-5 major trends:
|
||||
|
||||
- Trend 1: Description and impact
|
||||
- Trend 2: Description and impact
|
||||
- etc.}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Growth Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify primary factors driving market growth}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Market Inhibitors
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify factors constraining market growth}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Customer Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Segment Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: For each segment, create detailed profiles including demographics/firmographics, psychographics, behaviors, needs, and willingness to pay]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Segment 1: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Description:** {{Brief overview}}
|
||||
- **Size:** {{Number of customers/market value}}
|
||||
- **Characteristics:** {{Key demographics/firmographics}}
|
||||
- **Needs & Pain Points:** {{Primary problems they face}}
|
||||
- **Buying Process:** {{How they make purchasing decisions}}
|
||||
- **Willingness to Pay:** {{Price sensitivity and value perception}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for each additional segment>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Uncover what customers are really trying to accomplish]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Functional Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{List practical tasks and objectives customers need to complete}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Emotional Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe feelings and perceptions customers seek}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Social Jobs
|
||||
|
||||
{{Explain how customers want to be perceived by others}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Map the end-to-end customer experience for primary segments]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{For primary customer segment:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Awareness:** How they discover solutions
|
||||
2. **Consideration:** Evaluation criteria and process
|
||||
3. **Purchase:** Decision triggers and barriers
|
||||
4. **Onboarding:** Initial experience expectations
|
||||
5. **Usage:** Ongoing interaction patterns
|
||||
6. **Advocacy:** Referral and expansion behaviors}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Structure
|
||||
|
||||
{{Describe the overall competitive environment:
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration
|
||||
- Competitive intensity}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Major Players Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
{{For top 3-5 competitors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Company name and brief description
|
||||
- Market share estimate
|
||||
- Key strengths and weaknesses
|
||||
- Target customer focus
|
||||
- Pricing strategy}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analyze how competitors are positioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Value propositions
|
||||
- Differentiation strategies
|
||||
- Market gaps and opportunities}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Industry Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Porter's Five Forces Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Analyze each force with specific evidence and implications]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Supplier Power: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Buyer Power: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Competitive Rivalry: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Threat of New Entry: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Threat of Substitutes: {{Low/Medium/High}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Analysis and implications}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Lifecycle Stage
|
||||
|
||||
{{Identify where the market is in the adoption curve:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current stage and evidence
|
||||
- Implications for strategy
|
||||
- Expected progression timeline}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify specific opportunities based on the analysis]]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Opportunity 1: {{Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Description:** {{What is the opportunity?}}
|
||||
- **Size/Potential:** {{Quantify if possible}}
|
||||
- **Requirements:** {{What's needed to capture it?}}
|
||||
- **Risks:** {{Key challenges or barriers}}
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT for additional opportunities>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Recommend approach for market entry/expansion:
|
||||
|
||||
- Target segment prioritization
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Channel strategy
|
||||
- Partnership opportunities}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Pricing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
{{Based on willingness to pay analysis and competitive landscape:
|
||||
|
||||
- Recommended pricing model
|
||||
- Price points/ranges
|
||||
- Value metric
|
||||
- Competitive positioning}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
{{Key risks and mitigation strategies:
|
||||
|
||||
- Market risks
|
||||
- Competitive risks
|
||||
- Execution risks
|
||||
- Regulatory/compliance risks}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Data Sources
|
||||
|
||||
{{List all sources used in the research}}
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Detailed Calculations
|
||||
|
||||
{{Include any complex calculations or models}}
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Additional Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
{{Any supplementary analysis not included in main body}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing the document, offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for market research:
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Elicitation Actions** 0. Expand market sizing calculations with sensitivity analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. Deep dive into a specific customer segment
|
||||
2. Analyze an emerging market trend in detail
|
||||
3. Compare this market to an analogous market
|
||||
4. Stress test market assumptions
|
||||
5. Explore adjacent market opportunities
|
||||
6. Challenge market definition and boundaries
|
||||
7. Generate strategic scenarios (best/base/worst case)
|
||||
8. If only we had considered [X market factor]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on market research documents.]]
|
||||
252
bmad-core/templates/market-research-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
252
bmad-core/templates/market-research-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: market-research-template-v2
|
||||
name: Market Research Report
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/market-research.md
|
||||
title: "Market Research Report: {{project_product_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Market Research Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Expand market sizing calculations with sensitivity analysis"
|
||||
- "Deep dive into a specific customer segment"
|
||||
- "Analyze an emerging market trend in detail"
|
||||
- "Compare this market to an analogous market"
|
||||
- "Stress test market assumptions"
|
||||
- "Explore adjacent market opportunities"
|
||||
- "Challenge market definition and boundaries"
|
||||
- "Generate strategic scenarios (best/base/worst case)"
|
||||
- "If only we had considered [X market factor]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: Provide a high-level overview of key findings, market opportunity assessment, and strategic recommendations. Write this section LAST after completing all other sections.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: research-objectives
|
||||
title: Research Objectives & Methodology
|
||||
instruction: This template guides the creation of a comprehensive market research report. Begin by understanding what market insights the user needs and why. Work through each section systematically, using the appropriate analytical frameworks based on the research objectives.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: objectives
|
||||
title: Research Objectives
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List the primary objectives of this market research:
|
||||
- What decisions will this research inform?
|
||||
- What specific questions need to be answered?
|
||||
- What are the success criteria for this research?
|
||||
- id: methodology
|
||||
title: Research Methodology
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the research approach:
|
||||
- Data sources used (primary/secondary)
|
||||
- Analysis frameworks applied
|
||||
- Data collection timeframe
|
||||
- Limitations and assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
- id: market-overview
|
||||
title: Market Overview
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-definition
|
||||
title: Market Definition
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define the market being analyzed:
|
||||
- Product/service category
|
||||
- Geographic scope
|
||||
- Customer segments included
|
||||
- Value chain position
|
||||
- id: market-size-growth
|
||||
title: Market Size & Growth
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Guide through TAM, SAM, SOM calculations with clear assumptions. Use one or more approaches:
|
||||
- Top-down: Start with industry data, narrow down
|
||||
- Bottom-up: Build from customer/unit economics
|
||||
- Value theory: Based on value provided vs. alternatives
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: tam
|
||||
title: Total Addressable Market (TAM)
|
||||
instruction: Calculate and explain the total market opportunity
|
||||
- id: sam
|
||||
title: Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
|
||||
instruction: Define the portion of TAM you can realistically reach
|
||||
- id: som
|
||||
title: Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
|
||||
instruction: Estimate the portion you can realistically capture
|
||||
- id: market-trends
|
||||
title: Market Trends & Drivers
|
||||
instruction: Analyze key trends shaping the market using appropriate frameworks like PESTEL
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-trends
|
||||
title: Key Market Trends
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List and explain 3-5 major trends:
|
||||
- Trend 1: Description and impact
|
||||
- Trend 2: Description and impact
|
||||
- etc.
|
||||
- id: growth-drivers
|
||||
title: Growth Drivers
|
||||
instruction: Identify primary factors driving market growth
|
||||
- id: market-inhibitors
|
||||
title: Market Inhibitors
|
||||
instruction: Identify factors constraining market growth
|
||||
|
||||
- id: customer-analysis
|
||||
title: Customer Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: segment-profiles
|
||||
title: Target Segment Profiles
|
||||
instruction: For each segment, create detailed profiles including demographics/firmographics, psychographics, behaviors, needs, and willingness to pay
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: segment
|
||||
title: "Segment {{segment_number}}: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Description:** {{brief_overview}}
|
||||
- **Size:** {{number_of_customers_market_value}}
|
||||
- **Characteristics:** {{key_demographics_firmographics}}
|
||||
- **Needs & Pain Points:** {{primary_problems}}
|
||||
- **Buying Process:** {{purchasing_decisions}}
|
||||
- **Willingness to Pay:** {{price_sensitivity}}
|
||||
- id: jobs-to-be-done
|
||||
title: Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis
|
||||
instruction: Uncover what customers are really trying to accomplish
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: functional-jobs
|
||||
title: Functional Jobs
|
||||
instruction: List practical tasks and objectives customers need to complete
|
||||
- id: emotional-jobs
|
||||
title: Emotional Jobs
|
||||
instruction: Describe feelings and perceptions customers seek
|
||||
- id: social-jobs
|
||||
title: Social Jobs
|
||||
instruction: Explain how customers want to be perceived by others
|
||||
- id: customer-journey
|
||||
title: Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
instruction: Map the end-to-end customer experience for primary segments
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
For primary customer segment:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Awareness:** {{discovery_process}}
|
||||
2. **Consideration:** {{evaluation_criteria}}
|
||||
3. **Purchase:** {{decision_triggers}}
|
||||
4. **Onboarding:** {{initial_expectations}}
|
||||
5. **Usage:** {{interaction_patterns}}
|
||||
6. **Advocacy:** {{referral_behaviors}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: competitive-landscape
|
||||
title: Competitive Landscape
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-structure
|
||||
title: Market Structure
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the overall competitive environment:
|
||||
- Number of competitors
|
||||
- Market concentration
|
||||
- Competitive intensity
|
||||
- id: major-players
|
||||
title: Major Players Analysis
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
For top 3-5 competitors:
|
||||
- Company name and brief description
|
||||
- Market share estimate
|
||||
- Key strengths and weaknesses
|
||||
- Target customer focus
|
||||
- Pricing strategy
|
||||
- id: competitive-positioning
|
||||
title: Competitive Positioning
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Analyze how competitors are positioned:
|
||||
- Value propositions
|
||||
- Differentiation strategies
|
||||
- Market gaps and opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
- id: industry-analysis
|
||||
title: Industry Analysis
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: porters-five-forces
|
||||
title: Porter's Five Forces Assessment
|
||||
instruction: Analyze each force with specific evidence and implications
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: supplier-power
|
||||
title: "Supplier Power: {{power_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: buyer-power
|
||||
title: "Buyer Power: {{power_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: competitive-rivalry
|
||||
title: "Competitive Rivalry: {{intensity_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: threat-new-entry
|
||||
title: "Threat of New Entry: {{threat_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: threat-substitutes
|
||||
title: "Threat of Substitutes: {{threat_level}}"
|
||||
template: "{{analysis_and_implications}}"
|
||||
- id: adoption-lifecycle
|
||||
title: Technology Adoption Lifecycle Stage
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Identify where the market is in the adoption curve:
|
||||
- Current stage and evidence
|
||||
- Implications for strategy
|
||||
- Expected progression timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- id: opportunity-assessment
|
||||
title: Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: market-opportunities
|
||||
title: Market Opportunities
|
||||
instruction: Identify specific opportunities based on the analysis
|
||||
repeatable: true
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: opportunity
|
||||
title: "Opportunity {{opportunity_number}}: {{name}}"
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Description:** {{what_is_the_opportunity}}
|
||||
- **Size/Potential:** {{quantified_potential}}
|
||||
- **Requirements:** {{needed_to_capture}}
|
||||
- **Risks:** {{key_challenges}}
|
||||
- id: strategic-recommendations
|
||||
title: Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: go-to-market
|
||||
title: Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Recommend approach for market entry/expansion:
|
||||
- Target segment prioritization
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Channel strategy
|
||||
- Partnership opportunities
|
||||
- id: pricing-strategy
|
||||
title: Pricing Strategy
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Based on willingness to pay analysis and competitive landscape:
|
||||
- Recommended pricing model
|
||||
- Price points/ranges
|
||||
- Value metric
|
||||
- Competitive positioning
|
||||
- id: risk-mitigation
|
||||
title: Risk Mitigation
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Key risks and mitigation strategies:
|
||||
- Market risks
|
||||
- Competitive risks
|
||||
- Execution risks
|
||||
- Regulatory/compliance risks
|
||||
|
||||
- id: appendices
|
||||
title: Appendices
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: data-sources
|
||||
title: A. Data Sources
|
||||
instruction: List all sources used in the research
|
||||
- id: calculations
|
||||
title: B. Detailed Calculations
|
||||
instruction: Include any complex calculations or models
|
||||
- id: additional-analysis
|
||||
title: C. Additional Analysis
|
||||
instruction: Any supplementary analysis not included in main body
|
||||
@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# {{Project Name}} Product Requirements Document (PRD)
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: The default path and filename unless specified is docs/prd.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: If available, review any provided document or ask if any are optionally available: Project Brief]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals and Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Populate the 2 child sections based on what we have received from user description or the provided brief. Allow user to review the 2 sections and offer changes before proceeding]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Bullet list of 1 line desired outcomes the PRD will deliver if successful - user and project desires]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Background Context
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: 1-2 short paragraphs summarizing the background context, such as what we learned in the brief without being redundant with the goals, what and why this solves a problem, what the current landscape or need is etc...]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Track document versions and changes]]
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Draft the list of functional and non functional requirements under the two child sections, and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown and an identifier sequence starting with FR`.]]
|
||||
@{example: - FR6: The Todo List uses AI to detect and warn against adding potentially duplicate todo items that are worded differently.}
|
||||
|
||||
### Non Functional
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Each Requirement will be a bullet markdown and an identifier sequence starting with NFR`.]]
|
||||
@{example: - NFR1: AWS service usage **must** aim to stay within free-tier limits where feasible.}
|
||||
|
||||
^^CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## User Interface Design Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Capture high-level UI/UX vision to guide Design Architect and to inform story creation. Steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Pre-fill all subsections with educated guesses based on project context
|
||||
2. Present the complete rendered section to user
|
||||
3. Clearly let the user know where assumptions were made
|
||||
4. Ask targeted questions for unclear/missing elements or areas needing more specification
|
||||
5. This is NOT detailed UI spec - focus on product vision and user goals
|
||||
6. After section completion, immediately apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall UX Vision
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Interaction Paradigms
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Screens and Views
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: From a product perspective, what are the most critical screens or views necessary to deliver the the PRD values and goals? This is meant to be Conceptual High Level to Drive Rough Epic or User Stories]]
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
|
||||
- Login Screen
|
||||
- Main Dashboard
|
||||
- Item Detail Page
|
||||
- Settings Page
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Accessibility: { None, WCAG, etc }
|
||||
|
||||
### Branding
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Any known branding elements or style guides that must be incorporated?]]
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
|
||||
- Replicate the look and feel of early 1900s black and white cinema, including animated effects replicating film damage or projector glitches during page or state transitions.
|
||||
- Attached is the full color pallet and tokens for our corporate branding.
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Device and Platforms
|
||||
|
||||
@{example}
|
||||
"Web Responsive, and all mobile platforms", "IPhone Only", "ASCII Windows Desktop"
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
^^/CONDITION: has_ui^^
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Gather technical decisions that will guide the Architect. Steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Check if `{root}/data/technical-preferences.yaml` or an attached `technical-preferences` file exists - use it to pre-populate choices
|
||||
2. Ask user about: languages, frameworks, starter templates, libraries, APIs, deployment targets
|
||||
3. For unknowns, offer guidance based on project goals and MVP scope
|
||||
4. Document ALL technical choices with rationale (why this choice fits the project)
|
||||
5. These become constraints for the Architect - be specific and complete
|
||||
6. After section completion, apply `{root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md` protocol.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Structure: { Monorepo, Polyrepo, etc...}
|
||||
|
||||
### Service Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL DECISION - Document the high-level service architecture (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless functions within a Monorepo).]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL DECISION - Document the testing requirements, unit only, integration, e2e, manual, need for manual testing convenience methods).]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Technical Assumptions and Requests
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Throughout the entire process of drafting this document, if any other technical assumptions are raised or discovered appropriate for the architect, add them here as additional bulleted items]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Epics
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: First, present a high-level list of all epics for user approval, the epic_list and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display. Each epic should have a title and a short (1 sentence) goal statement. This allows the user to review the overall structure before diving into details.
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: Epics MUST be logically sequential following agile best practices:
|
||||
|
||||
- Each epic should deliver a significant, end-to-end, fully deployable increment of testable functionality
|
||||
- Epic 1 must establish foundational project infrastructure (app setup, Git, CI/CD, core services) unless we are adding new functionality to an existing app, while also delivering an initial piece of functionality, even as simple as a health-check route or display of a simple canary page - remember this when we produce the stories for the first epic!
|
||||
- Each subsequent epic builds upon previous epics' functionality delivering major blocks of functionality that provide tangible value to users or business when deployed
|
||||
- Not every project needs multiple epics, an epic needs to deliver value. For example, an API completed can deliver value even if a UI is not complete and planned for a separate epic.
|
||||
- Err on the side of less epics, but let the user know your rationale and offer options for splitting them if it seems some are too large or focused on disparate things.
|
||||
- Cross Cutting Concerns should flow through epics and stories and not be final stories. For example, adding a logging framework as a last story of an epic, or at the end of a project as a final epic or story would be terrible as we would not have logging from the beginning.]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: epic_list>>
|
||||
|
||||
- Epic{{epic_number}} {{epic_title}}: {{short_goal}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
@{example: epic_list}
|
||||
|
||||
1. Foundation & Core Infrastructure: Establish project setup, authentication, and basic user management
|
||||
2. Core Business Entities: Create and manage primary domain objects with CRUD operations
|
||||
3. User Workflows & Interactions: Enable key user journeys and business processes
|
||||
4. Reporting & Analytics: Provide insights and data visualization for users
|
||||
|
||||
@{/example}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After the epic list is approved, present each `epic_details` with all its stories and acceptance criteria as a complete review unit and immediately execute {root}/tasks/advanced-elicitation.md display, before moving on to the next epic.]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: epic_details>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Epic {{epic_number}} {{epic_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{epic_goal}} [[LLM: Expanded goal - 2-3 sentences describing the objective and value all the stories will achieve]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: CRITICAL STORY SEQUENCING REQUIREMENTS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Stories within each epic MUST be logically sequential
|
||||
- Each story should be a "vertical slice" delivering complete functionality aside from early enabler stories for project foundation
|
||||
- No story should depend on work from a later story or epic
|
||||
- Identify and note any direct prerequisite stories
|
||||
- Focus on "what" and "why" not "how" (leave technical implementation to Architect) yet be precise enough to support a logical sequential order of operations from story to story.
|
||||
- Ensure each story delivers clear user or business value, try to avoid enablers and build them into stories that deliver value.
|
||||
- Size stories for AI agent execution: Each story must be completable by a single AI agent in one focused session without context overflow
|
||||
- Think "junior developer working for 2-4 hours" - stories must be small, focused, and self-contained
|
||||
- If a story seems complex, break it down further as long as it can deliver a vertical slice
|
||||
- Each story should result in working, testable code before the agent's context window fills]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: story>>
|
||||
|
||||
### Story {{epic_number}}.{{story_number}} {{story_title}}
|
||||
|
||||
As a {{user_type}},
|
||||
I want {{action}},
|
||||
so that {{benefit}}.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define clear, comprehensive, and testable acceptance criteria that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Precisely define what "done" means from a functional perspective
|
||||
- Are unambiguous and serve as basis for verification
|
||||
- Include any critical non-functional requirements from the PRD
|
||||
- Consider local testability for backend/data components
|
||||
- Specify UI/UX requirements and framework adherence where applicable
|
||||
- Avoid cross-cutting concerns that should be in other stories or PRD sections]]
|
||||
|
||||
<<REPEAT: criteria>>
|
||||
|
||||
- {{criterion number}}: {{criteria}}
|
||||
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
<</REPEAT>>
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results Report
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Before running the checklist and drafting the prompts, offer to output the full updated PRD. If outputting it, confirm with the user that you will be proceeding to run the checklist and produce the report. Once the user confirms, execute the `pm-checklist` and populate the results in this section.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section will contain the prompt for the Design Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Architect Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This section will contain the prompt for the Architect, keep it short and to the point to initiate create architecture mode using this document as input.]]
|
||||
@@ -1,232 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/brief.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Project Brief: {{Project Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: This template guides creation of a comprehensive Project Brief that serves as the foundational input for product development.
|
||||
|
||||
Start by asking the user which mode they prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Interactive Mode** - Work through each section collaboratively
|
||||
2. **YOLO Mode** - Generate complete draft for review and refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning, understand what inputs are available (brainstorming results, market research, competitive analysis, initial ideas) and gather project context.]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Create a concise overview that captures the essence of the project. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product concept in 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Primary problem being solved
|
||||
- Target market identification
|
||||
- Key value proposition]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Write executive summary based on information gathered}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Articulate the problem with clarity and evidence. Address:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current state and pain points
|
||||
- Impact of the problem (quantify if possible)
|
||||
- Why existing solutions fall short
|
||||
- Urgency and importance of solving this now]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Detailed problem description with supporting evidence}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Solution
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Describe the solution approach at a high level. Include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Core concept and approach
|
||||
- Key differentiators from existing solutions
|
||||
- Why this solution will succeed where others haven't
|
||||
- High-level vision for the product]]
|
||||
|
||||
{{Solution description focusing on the "what" and "why", not implementation details}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Users
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define and characterize the intended users with specificity. For each user segment include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Demographic/firmographic profile
|
||||
- Current behaviors and workflows
|
||||
- Specific needs and pain points
|
||||
- Goals they're trying to achieve]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary User Segment: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Detailed description of primary users}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary User Segment: {{Segment Name}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{Description of secondary users if applicable}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals & Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Establish clear objectives and how to measure success. Make goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Objective 1 with metric}}
|
||||
- {{Objective 2 with metric}}
|
||||
- {{Objective 3 with metric}}
|
||||
|
||||
### User Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- {{How users will measure value}}
|
||||
- {{Engagement metrics}}
|
||||
- {{Satisfaction indicators}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
|
||||
|
||||
- {{KPI 1: Definition and target}}
|
||||
- {{KPI 2: Definition and target}}
|
||||
- {{KPI 3: Definition and target}}
|
||||
|
||||
## MVP Scope
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Define the minimum viable product clearly. Be specific about what's in and what's out. Help user distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Features (Must Have)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Feature 1:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
- **Feature 2:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
- **Feature 3:** {{Brief description and why it's essential}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Out of Scope for MVP
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Feature/capability explicitly not in MVP}}
|
||||
- {{Feature/capability to be considered post-MVP}}
|
||||
|
||||
### MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
{{Define what constitutes a successful MVP launch}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-MVP Vision
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Outline the longer-term product direction without overcommitting to specifics]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 Features
|
||||
|
||||
{{Next priority features after MVP success}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-term Vision
|
||||
|
||||
{{Where this product could go in 1-2 years}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Expansion Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
{{Potential new markets, use cases, or integrations}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Document known technical constraints and preferences. Note these are initial thoughts, not final decisions.]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Platform Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **Target Platforms:** {{Web, mobile, desktop, etc.}}
|
||||
- **Browser/OS Support:** {{Specific requirements}}
|
||||
- **Performance Requirements:** {{Load times, concurrent users, etc.}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Preferences
|
||||
|
||||
- **Frontend:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Backend:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Database:** {{If any preferences exist}}
|
||||
- **Hosting/Infrastructure:** {{Cloud preferences, on-prem requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- **Repository Structure:** {{Initial thoughts on monorepo vs. polyrepo}}
|
||||
- **Service Architecture:** {{Initial thoughts on monolith vs. microservices}}
|
||||
- **Integration Requirements:** {{Third-party services, APIs}}
|
||||
- **Security/Compliance:** {{Any specific requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Constraints & Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Clearly state limitations and assumptions to set realistic expectations]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- **Budget:** {{If known}}
|
||||
- **Timeline:** {{Target launch date or development timeframe}}
|
||||
- **Resources:** {{Team size, skill constraints}}
|
||||
- **Technical:** {{Legacy systems, required tech stack}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Assumption about users, market, or technology}}
|
||||
- {{Assumption about resources or support}}
|
||||
- {{Assumption about external dependencies}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: Identify unknowns and potential challenges proactively]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Risks
|
||||
|
||||
- **Risk 1:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
- **Risk 2:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
- **Risk 3:** {{Description and potential impact}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Question needing research or decision}}
|
||||
- {{Question about technical approach}}
|
||||
- {{Question about market or users}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Areas Needing Further Research
|
||||
|
||||
- {{Topic requiring deeper investigation}}
|
||||
- {{Validation needed before proceeding}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Research Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{If applicable, summarize key findings from:
|
||||
|
||||
- Market research
|
||||
- Competitive analysis
|
||||
- User interviews
|
||||
- Technical feasibility studies}}
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Stakeholder Input
|
||||
|
||||
{{Key feedback or requirements from stakeholders}}
|
||||
|
||||
### C. References
|
||||
|
||||
{{Links to relevant documents, research, or examples}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. {{First concrete next step}}
|
||||
2. {{Second concrete next step}}
|
||||
3. {{Third concrete next step}}
|
||||
|
||||
### PM Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
This Project Brief provides the full context for {{Project Name}}. Please start in 'PRD Generation Mode', review the brief thoroughly to work with the user to create the PRD section by section as the template indicates, asking for any necessary clarification or suggesting improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[LLM: After completing each major section (not subsections), offer advanced elicitation with these custom options for project briefs:
|
||||
|
||||
**Project Brief Elicitation Actions** 0. Expand section with more specific details
|
||||
|
||||
1. Validate against similar successful products
|
||||
2. Stress test assumptions with edge cases
|
||||
3. Explore alternative solution approaches
|
||||
4. Analyze resource/constraint trade-offs
|
||||
5. Generate risk mitigation strategies
|
||||
6. Challenge scope from MVP minimalist view
|
||||
7. Brainstorm creative feature possibilities
|
||||
8. If only we had [resource/capability/time]...
|
||||
9. Proceed to next section
|
||||
|
||||
These replace the standard elicitation options when working on project brief documents.]]
|
||||
221
bmad-core/templates/project-brief-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
221
bmad-core/templates/project-brief-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: project-brief-template-v2
|
||||
name: Project Brief
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/brief.md
|
||||
title: "Project Brief: {{project_name}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
custom_elicitation:
|
||||
title: "Project Brief Elicitation Actions"
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- "Expand section with more specific details"
|
||||
- "Validate against similar successful products"
|
||||
- "Stress test assumptions with edge cases"
|
||||
- "Explore alternative solution approaches"
|
||||
- "Analyze resource/constraint trade-offs"
|
||||
- "Generate risk mitigation strategies"
|
||||
- "Challenge scope from MVP minimalist view"
|
||||
- "Brainstorm creative feature possibilities"
|
||||
- "If only we had [resource/capability/time]..."
|
||||
- "Proceed to next section"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: introduction
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
This template guides creation of a comprehensive Project Brief that serves as the foundational input for product development.
|
||||
|
||||
Start by asking the user which mode they prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Interactive Mode** - Work through each section collaboratively
|
||||
2. **YOLO Mode** - Generate complete draft for review and refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning, understand what inputs are available (brainstorming results, market research, competitive analysis, initial ideas) and gather project context.
|
||||
|
||||
- id: executive-summary
|
||||
title: Executive Summary
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Create a concise overview that captures the essence of the project. Include:
|
||||
- Product concept in 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Primary problem being solved
|
||||
- Target market identification
|
||||
- Key value proposition
|
||||
template: "{{executive_summary_content}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: problem-statement
|
||||
title: Problem Statement
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Articulate the problem with clarity and evidence. Address:
|
||||
- Current state and pain points
|
||||
- Impact of the problem (quantify if possible)
|
||||
- Why existing solutions fall short
|
||||
- Urgency and importance of solving this now
|
||||
template: "{{detailed_problem_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: proposed-solution
|
||||
title: Proposed Solution
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Describe the solution approach at a high level. Include:
|
||||
- Core concept and approach
|
||||
- Key differentiators from existing solutions
|
||||
- Why this solution will succeed where others haven't
|
||||
- High-level vision for the product
|
||||
template: "{{solution_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: target-users
|
||||
title: Target Users
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Define and characterize the intended users with specificity. For each user segment include:
|
||||
- Demographic/firmographic profile
|
||||
- Current behaviors and workflows
|
||||
- Specific needs and pain points
|
||||
- Goals they're trying to achieve
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: primary-segment
|
||||
title: "Primary User Segment: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
template: "{{primary_user_description}}"
|
||||
- id: secondary-segment
|
||||
title: "Secondary User Segment: {{segment_name}}"
|
||||
condition: Has secondary user segment
|
||||
template: "{{secondary_user_description}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: goals-metrics
|
||||
title: Goals & Success Metrics
|
||||
instruction: Establish clear objectives and how to measure success. Make goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: business-objectives
|
||||
title: Business Objectives
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{objective_with_metric}}"
|
||||
- id: user-success-metrics
|
||||
title: User Success Metrics
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{user_metric}}"
|
||||
- id: kpis
|
||||
title: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{kpi}}: {{definition_and_target}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: mvp-scope
|
||||
title: MVP Scope
|
||||
instruction: Define the minimum viable product clearly. Be specific about what's in and what's out. Help user distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: core-features
|
||||
title: Core Features (Must Have)
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- **{{feature}}:** {{description_and_rationale}}"
|
||||
- id: out-of-scope
|
||||
title: Out of Scope for MVP
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{feature_or_capability}}"
|
||||
- id: mvp-success-criteria
|
||||
title: MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
template: "{{mvp_success_definition}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: post-mvp-vision
|
||||
title: Post-MVP Vision
|
||||
instruction: Outline the longer-term product direction without overcommitting to specifics
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: phase-2-features
|
||||
title: Phase 2 Features
|
||||
template: "{{next_priority_features}}"
|
||||
- id: long-term-vision
|
||||
title: Long-term Vision
|
||||
template: "{{one_two_year_vision}}"
|
||||
- id: expansion-opportunities
|
||||
title: Expansion Opportunities
|
||||
template: "{{potential_expansions}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: technical-considerations
|
||||
title: Technical Considerations
|
||||
instruction: Document known technical constraints and preferences. Note these are initial thoughts, not final decisions.
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: platform-requirements
|
||||
title: Platform Requirements
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Target Platforms:** {{platforms}}
|
||||
- **Browser/OS Support:** {{specific_requirements}}
|
||||
- **Performance Requirements:** {{performance_specs}}
|
||||
- id: technology-preferences
|
||||
title: Technology Preferences
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Frontend:** {{frontend_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Backend:** {{backend_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Database:** {{database_preferences}}
|
||||
- **Hosting/Infrastructure:** {{infrastructure_preferences}}
|
||||
- id: architecture-considerations
|
||||
title: Architecture Considerations
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Repository Structure:** {{repo_thoughts}}
|
||||
- **Service Architecture:** {{service_thoughts}}
|
||||
- **Integration Requirements:** {{integration_needs}}
|
||||
- **Security/Compliance:** {{security_requirements}}
|
||||
|
||||
- id: constraints-assumptions
|
||||
title: Constraints & Assumptions
|
||||
instruction: Clearly state limitations and assumptions to set realistic expectations
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: constraints
|
||||
title: Constraints
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- **Budget:** {{budget_info}}
|
||||
- **Timeline:** {{timeline_info}}
|
||||
- **Resources:** {{resource_info}}
|
||||
- **Technical:** {{technical_constraints}}
|
||||
- id: key-assumptions
|
||||
title: Key Assumptions
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{assumption}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: risks-questions
|
||||
title: Risks & Open Questions
|
||||
instruction: Identify unknowns and potential challenges proactively
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: key-risks
|
||||
title: Key Risks
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- **{{risk}}:** {{description_and_impact}}"
|
||||
- id: open-questions
|
||||
title: Open Questions
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{question}}"
|
||||
- id: research-areas
|
||||
title: Areas Needing Further Research
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
template: "- {{research_topic}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: appendices
|
||||
title: Appendices
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: research-summary
|
||||
title: A. Research Summary
|
||||
condition: Has research findings
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
If applicable, summarize key findings from:
|
||||
- Market research
|
||||
- Competitive analysis
|
||||
- User interviews
|
||||
- Technical feasibility studies
|
||||
- id: stakeholder-input
|
||||
title: B. Stakeholder Input
|
||||
condition: Has stakeholder feedback
|
||||
template: "{{stakeholder_feedback}}"
|
||||
- id: references
|
||||
title: C. References
|
||||
template: "{{relevant_links_and_docs}}"
|
||||
|
||||
- id: next-steps
|
||||
title: Next Steps
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: immediate-actions
|
||||
title: Immediate Actions
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
template: "{{action_item}}"
|
||||
- id: pm-handoff
|
||||
title: PM Handoff
|
||||
content: |
|
||||
This Project Brief provides the full context for {{project_name}}. Please start in 'PRD Generation Mode', review the brief thoroughly to work with the user to create the PRD section by section as the template indicates, asking for any necessary clarification or suggesting improvements.
|
||||
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
defaultOutput: docs/stories/{{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}.{{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}.md
|
||||
smAgent:
|
||||
editableSections: Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks / Subtasks, Dev Notes, Testing, Change Log
|
||||
sectionSpecificInstructions:
|
||||
"Dev Notes":
|
||||
- Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story
|
||||
- Do not invent information.
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story.
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here.
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks.
|
||||
Testing:
|
||||
- List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to (test file location, test standards, etc)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Story {{EpicNum}}.{{StoryNum}}: {{Short Title Copied from Epic File specific story}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: {{ Draft | Approved | InProgress | Review | Done }}
|
||||
|
||||
## Story
|
||||
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},\
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},\
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
{{ Copy of Acceptance Criteria numbered list }}
|
||||
|
||||
## Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | Version | Description | Author |
|
||||
| :--- | :------ | :---------- | :----- |
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Agent Record
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Model Used: {{Agent Model Name/Version}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Debug Log References
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Notes List
|
||||
|
||||
### File List
|
||||
|
||||
## QA Results
|
||||
137
bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
137
bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
template:
|
||||
id: story-template-v2
|
||||
name: Story Document
|
||||
version: 2.0
|
||||
output:
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
filename: docs/stories/{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}.{{story_title_short}}.md
|
||||
title: "Story {{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}: {{story_title_short}}"
|
||||
|
||||
workflow:
|
||||
mode: interactive
|
||||
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
agent_config:
|
||||
editable_sections:
|
||||
- Status
|
||||
- Story
|
||||
- Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
- Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
- Dev Notes
|
||||
- Testing
|
||||
- Change Log
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: status
|
||||
title: Status
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
choices: [Draft, Approved, InProgress, Review, Done]
|
||||
instruction: Select the current status of the story
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: story
|
||||
title: Story
|
||||
type: template-text
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
**As a** {{role}},
|
||||
**I want** {{action}},
|
||||
**so that** {{benefit}}
|
||||
instruction: Define the user story using the standard format with role, action, and benefit
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: acceptance-criteria
|
||||
title: Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
type: numbered-list
|
||||
instruction: Copy the acceptance criteria numbered list from the epic file
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: tasks-subtasks
|
||||
title: Tasks / Subtasks
|
||||
type: bullet-list
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Break down the story into specific tasks and subtasks needed for implementation.
|
||||
Reference applicable acceptance criteria numbers where relevant.
|
||||
template: |
|
||||
- [ ] Task 1 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask1.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 2 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 2.1...
|
||||
- [ ] Task 3 (AC: # if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Subtask 3.1...
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-notes
|
||||
title: Dev Notes
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
Populate relevant information, only what was pulled from actual artifacts from docs folder, relevant to this story:
|
||||
- Do not invent information
|
||||
- If known add Relevant Source Tree info that relates to this story
|
||||
- If there were important notes from previous story that are relevant to this one, include them here
|
||||
- Put enough information in this section so that the dev agent should NEVER need to read the architecture documents, these notes along with the tasks and subtasks must give the Dev Agent the complete context it needs to comprehend with the least amount of overhead the information to complete the story, meeting all AC and completing all tasks+subtasks
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: testing-standards
|
||||
title: Testing
|
||||
instruction: |
|
||||
List Relevant Testing Standards from Architecture the Developer needs to conform to:
|
||||
- Test file location
|
||||
- Test standards
|
||||
- Testing frameworks and patterns to use
|
||||
- Any specific testing requirements for this story
|
||||
elicit: true
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: change-log
|
||||
title: Change Log
|
||||
type: table
|
||||
columns: [Date, Version, Description, Author]
|
||||
instruction: Track changes made to this story document
|
||||
owner: scrum-master
|
||||
editors: [scrum-master, dev-agent, qa-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: dev-agent-record
|
||||
title: Dev Agent Record
|
||||
instruction: This section is populated by the development agent during implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- id: agent-model
|
||||
title: Agent Model Used
|
||||
template: "{{agent_model_name_version}}"
|
||||
instruction: Record the specific AI agent model and version used for development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: debug-log-references
|
||||
title: Debug Log References
|
||||
instruction: Reference any debug logs or traces generated during development
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: completion-notes
|
||||
title: Completion Notes List
|
||||
instruction: Notes about the completion of tasks and any issues encountered
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: file-list
|
||||
title: File List
|
||||
instruction: List all files created, modified, or affected during story implementation
|
||||
owner: dev-agent
|
||||
editors: [dev-agent]
|
||||
|
||||
- id: qa-results
|
||||
title: QA Results
|
||||
instruction: Results from QA Agent QA review of the completed story implementation
|
||||
owner: qa-agent
|
||||
editors: [qa-agent]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user