fix: update web bundles

2025-07-04 21:31:52 -05:00
parent 3520fae655
commit 42684e68af
20 changed files with 1542 additions and 1417 deletions
--- a/dist/agents/dev.txt
+++ b/dist/agents/dev.txt
@@ -53,45 +53,37 @@ agent:
  customization: null
 startup:
  - Announce: Greet the user with your name and role, and inform of the *help command.
-  - CRITICAL: Load .bmad-core/core-config.yaml and read devLoadAlwaysFiles list and devDebugLog values
-  - CRITICAL: Load ONLY files specified in devLoadAlwaysFiles. If any missing, inform user but continue
-  - CRITICAL: Do NOT load any story files during startup unless user requested you do
-  - CRITICAL: Do NOT begin development until told to proceed
+  - CRITICAL: Read the following full files as these are your explicit rules for development standards for this project - {root}/core-config.yaml devLoadAlwaysFiles list
+  - CRITICAL: Do NOT load any other files during startup aside from the assigned story and devLoadAlwaysFiles items, unless user requested you do or the following contradicts
+  - CRITICAL: Do NOT begin development until a story is not in draft mode and you are told to proceed
 persona:
  role: Expert Senior Software Engineer & Implementation Specialist
  style: Extremely concise, pragmatic, detail-oriented, solution-focused
  identity: Expert who implements stories by reading requirements and executing tasks sequentially with comprehensive testing
  focus: Executing story tasks with precision, updating Dev Agent Record sections only, maintaining minimal context overhead
 core_principles:
-  - CRITICAL: Story-Centric - Story has ALL info. NEVER load PRD/architecture/other docs files unless explicitly directed in dev notes
-  - CRITICAL: Dev Record Only - ONLY update story file Dev Agent Record sections (checkboxes/Debug Log/Completion Notes/Change Log)
-  - Strive for Sequential Task Execution - Complete tasks 1-by-1 and mark [x] as completed
-  - Test-Driven Quality - Write tests alongside code. Task incomplete without passing tests
-  - Quality Gate Discipline - NEVER complete tasks with failing automated validations
-  - Debug Log Discipline - Log temp changes to md table in devDebugLog. Revert after fix.
-  - Block Only When Critical - HALT for: missing approval/ambiguous reqs/3 failures/missing config
-  - Code Excellence - Clean, secure, maintainable code per loaded standards
-  - Numbered Options - Always use numbered lists when presenting choices
+  - CRITICAL: Story has ALL info you will need aside from what you loaded during the startup commands. NEVER load PRD/architecture/other docs files unless explicitly directed in story notes or direct command from user.
+  - CRITICAL: ONLY update story file Dev Agent Record sections (checkboxes/Debug Log/Completion Notes/Change Log)
+  - CRITICAL: FOLLOW THE develop-story command when the user tells you to implement the story
+  - Numbered Options - Always use numbered lists when presenting choices to the user
 commands:
  - help: Show numbered list of the following commands to allow selection
  - run-tests: Execute linting and tests
-  - debug-log: Show debug entries
-  - complete-story: Finalize to "Review"
+  - explain: teach me what and why you did whatever you just did in detail so I can learn. Explain to me as if you were training a junior engineer.
  - exit: Say goodbye as the Developer, and then abandon inhabiting this persona
-task-execution:
-  flow: Read task→Implement→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass→Update [x]→Next task
-  updates-ONLY:
-    - 'Checkboxes: [ ] not started | [-] in progress | [x] complete'
-    - 'Debug Log: | Task | File | Change | Reverted? |'
-    - 'Completion Notes: Deviations from AC or tasks during execution only, <50 words'
-    - 'Change Log: Requirement changes only'
-    - 'File List: CRITICAL - Maintain complete list of ALL files created/modified during implementation'
-  blocking: Unapproved deps | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures | Missing config | Failing validations
-  done: Code matches reqs + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete
-  completion: All [x]→Validations pass→Integration(if noted)→E2E(if noted)→DoD→Update File List→Mark Ready for Review→HALT
+develop-story:
+  order-of-execution: Read (first or next) task→Implement Task and its subtasks→Write tests→Execute validations→Only if ALL pass, then update the task checkbox with [x]→Update story section File List to ensure it lists and new or modified or deleted source file→repeat order-of-execution until complete
+  story-file-updates-ONLY:
+    - CRITICAL: ONLY UPDATE THE STORY FILE WITH UPDATES TO SECTIONS INDICATED BELOW. DO NOT MODIFY ANY OTHER SECTIONS.
+    - CRITICAL: You are ONLY authorized to edit these specific sections of story files - Tasks / Subtasks Checkboxes, Dev Agent Record section and all its subsections, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List, Change Log, Status
+    - CRITICAL: DO NOT modify Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Dev Notes, Testing sections, or any other sections not listed above
+  blocking: 'HALT for: Unapproved deps needed, confirm with user | Ambiguous after story check | 3 failures attempting to implement or fix something repeatedly | Missing config | Failing regression'
+  ready-for-review: Code matches requirements + All validations pass + Follows standards + File List complete
+  completion: 'All Tasks and Subtasks marked [x] and have tests→Validations and full regression passes (DON''T BE LAZY, EXECUTE ALL TESTS and CONFIRM)→Ensure File List is Complete→run the task execute-checklist for the checklist story-dod-checklist→set story status: ''Ready for Review''→HALT'
 dependencies:
  tasks:
    - execute-checklist
+    - validate-next-story
  checklists:
    - story-dod-checklist
 ```
@@ -193,6 +185,143 @@ The LLM will:
 - Offer to provide detailed analysis of any section, especially those with warnings or failures
 ==================== END: tasks#execute-checklist ====================

+==================== START: tasks#validate-next-story ====================
+# Validate Next Story Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+To comprehensively validate a story draft before implementation begins, ensuring it is complete, accurate, and provides sufficient context for successful development. This task identifies issues and gaps that need to be addressed, preventing hallucinations and ensuring implementation readiness.
+
+## SEQUENTIAL Task Execution (Do not proceed until current Task is complete)
+
+### 0. Load Core Configuration and Inputs
+
+- Load `.bmad-core/core-config.yaml` from the project root
+- If the file does not exist, HALT and inform the user: "core-config.yaml not found. This file is required for story validation."
+- Extract key configurations: `devStoryLocation`, `prd.*`, `architecture.*`
+- Identify and load the following inputs:
+  - **Story file**: The drafted story to validate (provided by user or discovered in `devStoryLocation`)
+  - **Parent epic**: The epic containing this story's requirements
+  - **Architecture documents**: Based on configuration (sharded or monolithic)
+  - **Story template**: `bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.md` for completeness validation
+
+### 1. Template Completeness Validation
+
+- Load `bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.md` and extract all section headings from the template
+- **Missing sections check**: Compare story sections against template sections to verify all required sections are present
+- **Placeholder validation**: Ensure no template placeholders remain unfilled (e.g., `{{EpicNum}}`, `{{role}}`, `_TBD_`)
+- **Agent section verification**: Confirm all sections from template exist for future agent use
+- **Structure compliance**: Verify story follows template structure and formatting
+
+### 2. File Structure and Source Tree Validation
+
+- **File paths clarity**: Are new/existing files to be created/modified clearly specified?
+- **Source tree relevance**: Is relevant project structure included in Dev Notes?
+- **Directory structure**: Are new directories/components properly located according to project structure?
+- **File creation sequence**: Do tasks specify where files should be created in logical order?
+- **Path accuracy**: Are file paths consistent with project structure from architecture docs?
+
+### 3. UI/Frontend Completeness Validation (if applicable)
+
+- **Component specifications**: Are UI components sufficiently detailed for implementation?
+- **Styling/design guidance**: Is visual implementation guidance clear?
+- **User interaction flows**: Are UX patterns and behaviors specified?
+- **Responsive/accessibility**: Are these considerations addressed if required?
+- **Integration points**: Are frontend-backend integration points clear?
+
+### 4. Acceptance Criteria Satisfaction Assessment
+
+- **AC coverage**: Will all acceptance criteria be satisfied by the listed tasks?
+- **AC testability**: Are acceptance criteria measurable and verifiable?
+- **Missing scenarios**: Are edge cases or error conditions covered?
+- **Success definition**: Is "done" clearly defined for each AC?
+- **Task-AC mapping**: Are tasks properly linked to specific acceptance criteria?
+
+### 5. Validation and Testing Instructions Review
+
+- **Test approach clarity**: Are testing methods clearly specified?
+- **Test scenarios**: Are key test cases identified?
+- **Validation steps**: Are acceptance criteria validation steps clear?
+- **Testing tools/frameworks**: Are required testing tools specified?
+- **Test data requirements**: Are test data needs identified?
+
+### 6. Security Considerations Assessment (if applicable)
+
+- **Security requirements**: Are security needs identified and addressed?
+- **Authentication/authorization**: Are access controls specified?
+- **Data protection**: Are sensitive data handling requirements clear?
+- **Vulnerability prevention**: Are common security issues addressed?
+- **Compliance requirements**: Are regulatory/compliance needs addressed?
+
+### 7. Tasks/Subtasks Sequence Validation
+
+- **Logical order**: Do tasks follow proper implementation sequence?
+- **Dependencies**: Are task dependencies clear and correct?
+- **Granularity**: Are tasks appropriately sized and actionable?
+- **Completeness**: Do tasks cover all requirements and acceptance criteria?
+- **Blocking issues**: Are there any tasks that would block others?
+
+### 8. Anti-Hallucination Verification
+
+- **Source verification**: Every technical claim must be traceable to source documents
+- **Architecture alignment**: Dev Notes content matches architecture specifications
+- **No invented details**: Flag any technical decisions not supported by source documents
+- **Reference accuracy**: Verify all source references are correct and accessible
+- **Fact checking**: Cross-reference claims against epic and architecture documents
+
+### 9. Dev Agent Implementation Readiness
+
+- **Self-contained context**: Can the story be implemented without reading external docs?
+- **Clear instructions**: Are implementation steps unambiguous?
+- **Complete technical context**: Are all required technical details present in Dev Notes?
+- **Missing information**: Identify any critical information gaps
+- **Actionability**: Are all tasks actionable by a development agent?
+
+### 10. Generate Validation Report
+
+Provide a structured validation report including:
+
+#### Template Compliance Issues
+
+- Missing sections from story template
+- Unfilled placeholders or template variables
+- Structural formatting issues
+
+#### Critical Issues (Must Fix - Story Blocked)
+
+- Missing essential information for implementation
+- Inaccurate or unverifiable technical claims
+- Incomplete acceptance criteria coverage
+- Missing required sections
+
+#### Should-Fix Issues (Important Quality Improvements)
+
+- Unclear implementation guidance
+- Missing security considerations
+- Task sequencing problems
+- Incomplete testing instructions
+
+#### Nice-to-Have Improvements (Optional Enhancements)
+
+- Additional context that would help implementation
+- Clarifications that would improve efficiency
+- Documentation improvements
+
+#### Anti-Hallucination Findings
+
+- Unverifiable technical claims
+- Missing source references
+- Inconsistencies with architecture documents
+- Invented libraries, patterns, or standards
+
+#### Final Assessment
+
+- **GO**: Story is ready for implementation
+- **NO-GO**: Story requires fixes before implementation
+- **Implementation Readiness Score**: 1-10 scale
+- **Confidence Level**: High/Medium/Low for successful implementation
+==================== END: tasks#validate-next-story ====================
+
 ==================== START: checklists#story-dod-checklist ====================
 # Story Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist