ros/BMAD-METHOD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: transform QA agent into Test Architect with advanced quality capabilities

Browse Source 
- Add 6 specialized quality assessment commands
  - Implement risk-based testing with scoring
  - Create quality gate system with deterministic decisions
  - Add comprehensive test design and NFR validation
  - Update documentation with stage-based workflow integration
This commit is contained in:
Murat Ozcan
2025-08-12 13:03:32 -05:00
parent b7a34b4fc6
commit 34e75bef96
68 changed files with 6616 additions and 1321 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
bmad-core/checklists/architect-checklist.md
View File

@@ -403,33 +403,28 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
Now that you've completed the checklist, generate a comprehensive validation report that includes:
1. Executive Summary
- Overall architecture readiness (High/Medium/Low)
- Critical risks identified
- Key strengths of the architecture
- Project type (Full-stack/Frontend/Backend) and sections evaluated
2. Section Analysis
- Pass rate for each major section (percentage of items passed)
- Most concerning failures or gaps
- Sections requiring immediate attention
- Note any sections skipped due to project type
3. Risk Assessment
- Top 5 risks by severity
- Mitigation recommendations for each
- Timeline impact of addressing issues
4. Recommendations
- Must-fix items before development
- Should-fix items for better quality
- Nice-to-have improvements
5. AI Implementation Readiness
- Specific concerns for AI agent implementation
- Areas needing additional clarification
- Complexity hotspots to address

5
bmad-core/checklists/pm-checklist.md
View File

@@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
1. Executive Summary
- Overall PRD completeness (percentage)
- MVP scope appropriateness (Too Large/Just Right/Too Small)
- Readiness for architecture phase (Ready/Nearly Ready/Not Ready)
@@ -312,26 +311,22 @@ Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
2. Category Analysis Table
Fill in the actual table with:
- Status: PASS (90%+ complete), PARTIAL (60-89%), FAIL (<60%)
- Critical Issues: Specific problems that block progress
3. Top Issues by Priority
- BLOCKERS: Must fix before architect can proceed
- HIGH: Should fix for quality
- MEDIUM: Would improve clarity
- LOW: Nice to have
4. MVP Scope Assessment
- Features that might be cut for true MVP
- Missing features that are essential
- Complexity concerns
- Timeline realism
5. Technical Readiness
- Clarity of technical constraints
- Identified technical risks
- Areas needing architect investigation

9
bmad-core/checklists/po-master-checklist.md
View File

@@ -8,12 +8,10 @@ PROJECT TYPE DETECTION:
First, determine the project type by checking:
1. Is this a GREENFIELD project (new from scratch)?
- Look for: New project initialization, no existing codebase references
- Check for: prd.md, architecture.md, new project setup stories
2. Is this a BROWNFIELD project (enhancing existing system)?
- Look for: References to existing codebase, enhancement/modification language
- Check for: brownfield-prd.md, brownfield-architecture.md, existing system analysis
@@ -347,7 +345,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
1. Executive Summary
- Project type: [Greenfield/Brownfield] with [UI/No UI]
- Overall readiness (percentage)
- Go/No-Go recommendation
@@ -357,42 +354,36 @@ Generate a comprehensive validation report that adapts to project type:
2. Project-Specific Analysis
FOR GREENFIELD:
- Setup completeness
- Dependency sequencing
- MVP scope appropriateness
- Development timeline feasibility
FOR BROWNFIELD:
- Integration risk level (High/Medium/Low)
- Existing system impact assessment
- Rollback readiness
- User disruption potential
3. Risk Assessment
- Top 5 risks by severity
- Mitigation recommendations
- Timeline impact of addressing issues
- [BROWNFIELD] Specific integration risks
4. MVP Completeness
- Core features coverage
- Missing essential functionality
- Scope creep identified
- True MVP vs over-engineering
5. Implementation Readiness
- Developer clarity score (1-10)
- Ambiguous requirements count
- Missing technical details
- [BROWNFIELD] Integration point clarity
6. Recommendations
- Must-fix before development
- Should-fix for quality
- Consider for improvement

7
bmad-core/checklists/story-dod-checklist.md
View File

@@ -25,14 +25,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
1. **Requirements Met:**
[[LLM: Be specific - list each requirement and whether it's complete]]
- [ ] All functional requirements specified in the story are implemented.
- [ ] All acceptance criteria defined in the story are met.
2. **Coding Standards & Project Structure:**
[[LLM: Code quality matters for maintainability. Check each item carefully]]
- [ ] All new/modified code strictly adheres to `Operational Guidelines`.
- [ ] All new/modified code aligns with `Project Structure` (file locations, naming, etc.).
- [ ] Adherence to `Tech Stack` for technologies/versions used (if story introduces or modifies tech usage).
@@ -44,7 +42,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
3. **Testing:**
[[LLM: Testing proves your code works. Be honest about test coverage]]
- [ ] All required unit tests as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
- [ ] All required integration tests (if applicable) as per the story and `Operational Guidelines` Testing Strategy are implemented.
- [ ] All tests (unit, integration, E2E if applicable) pass successfully.
@@ -53,14 +50,12 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
4. **Functionality & Verification:**
[[LLM: Did you actually run and test your code? Be specific about what you tested]]
- [ ] Functionality has been manually verified by the developer (e.g., running the app locally, checking UI, testing API endpoints).
- [ ] Edge cases and potential error conditions considered and handled gracefully.
5. **Story Administration:**
[[LLM: Documentation helps the next developer. What should they know?]]
- [ ] All tasks within the story file are marked as complete.
- [ ] Any clarifications or decisions made during development are documented in the story file or linked appropriately.
- [ ] The story wrap up section has been completed with notes of changes or information relevant to the next story or overall project, the agent model that was primarily used during development, and the changelog of any changes is properly updated.
@@ -68,7 +63,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
6. **Dependencies, Build & Configuration:**
[[LLM: Build issues block everyone. Ensure everything compiles and runs cleanly]]
- [ ] Project builds successfully without errors.
- [ ] Project linting passes
- [ ] Any new dependencies added were either pre-approved in the story requirements OR explicitly approved by the user during development (approval documented in story file).
@@ -79,7 +73,6 @@ The goal is quality delivery, not just checking boxes.]]
7. **Documentation (If Applicable):**
[[LLM: Good documentation prevents future confusion. What needs explaining?]]
- [ ] Relevant inline code documentation (e.g., JSDoc, TSDoc, Python docstrings) for new public APIs or complex logic is complete.
- [ ] User-facing documentation updated, if changes impact users.
- [ ] Technical documentation (e.g., READMEs, system diagrams) updated if significant architectural changes were made.

3
bmad-core/checklists/story-draft-checklist.md
View File

@@ -117,19 +117,16 @@ Note: We don't need every file listed - just the important ones.]]
Generate a concise validation report:
1. Quick Summary
- Story readiness: READY / NEEDS REVISION / BLOCKED
- Clarity score (1-10)
- Major gaps identified
2. Fill in the validation table with:
- PASS: Requirements clearly met
- PARTIAL: Some gaps but workable
- FAIL: Critical information missing
3. Specific Issues (if any)
- List concrete problems to fix
- Suggest specific improvements
- Identify any blocking dependencies