ros/BMAD-METHOD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: transform QA agent into Test Architect with advanced quality ca… (#433)

Browse Source 
* feat: transform QA agent into Test Architect with advanced quality capabilities

  - Add 6 specialized quality assessment commands
  - Implement risk-based testing with scoring
  - Create quality gate system with deterministic decisions
  - Add comprehensive test design and NFR validation
  - Update documentation with stage-based workflow integration

* feat: transform QA agent into Test Architect with advanced quality capabilities

  - Add 6 specialized quality assessment commands
  - Implement risk-based testing with scoring
  - Create quality gate system with deterministic decisions
  - Add comprehensive test design and NFR validation
  - Update documentation with stage-based workflow integration

* docs: refined the docs for test architect

* fix: addressed review comments from manjaroblack, round 1

* fix: addressed review comments from manjaroblack, round 1

---------

Co-authored-by: Murat Ozcan <murat@mac.lan>
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Murat K Ozcan
2025-08-15 21:02:37 -05:00
committed by GitHub
parent 33269c888d
commit 0b61175d98
76 changed files with 9245 additions and 1442 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
dist/agents/pm.txt vendored
View File

@@ -304,63 +304,54 @@ CRITICAL: First, help the user select the most appropriate research focus based
Present these numbered options to the user:
1. **Product Validation Research**
- Validate product hypotheses and market fit
- Test assumptions about user needs and solutions
- Assess technical and business feasibility
- Identify risks and mitigation strategies
2. **Market Opportunity Research**
- Analyze market size and growth potential
- Identify market segments and dynamics
- Assess market entry strategies
- Evaluate timing and market readiness
3. **User & Customer Research**
- Deep dive into user personas and behaviors
- Understand jobs-to-be-done and pain points
- Map customer journeys and touchpoints
- Analyze willingness to pay and value perception
4. **Competitive Intelligence Research**
- Detailed competitor analysis and positioning
- Feature and capability comparisons
- Business model and strategy analysis
- Identify competitive advantages and gaps
5. **Technology & Innovation Research**
- Assess technology trends and possibilities
- Evaluate technical approaches and architectures
- Identify emerging technologies and disruptions
- Analyze build vs. buy vs. partner options
6. **Industry & Ecosystem Research**
- Map industry value chains and dynamics
- Identify key players and relationships
- Analyze regulatory and compliance factors
- Understand partnership opportunities
7. **Strategic Options Research**
- Evaluate different strategic directions
- Assess business model alternatives
- Analyze go-to-market strategies
- Consider expansion and scaling paths
8. **Risk & Feasibility Research**
- Identify and assess various risk factors
- Evaluate implementation challenges
- Analyze resource requirements
- Consider regulatory and legal implications
9. **Custom Research Focus**
- User-defined research objectives
- Specialized domain investigation
- Cross-functional research needs
@@ -529,13 +520,11 @@ CRITICAL: collaborate with the user to develop specific, actionable research que
### 5. Review and Refinement
1. **Present Complete Prompt**
- Show the full research prompt
- Explain key elements and rationale
- Highlight any assumptions made
2. **Gather Feedback**
- Are the objectives clear and correct?
- Do the questions address all concerns?
- Is the scope appropriate?
@@ -897,7 +886,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
## Instructions
1. **Initial Assessment**
- If user or the task being run provides a checklist name:
- Try fuzzy matching (e.g. "architecture checklist" -> "architect-checklist")
- If multiple matches found, ask user to clarify
@@ -910,14 +898,12 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
- All at once (YOLO mode - recommended for checklists, there will be a summary of sections at the end to discuss)
2. **Document and Artifact Gathering**
- Each checklist will specify its required documents/artifacts at the beginning
- Follow the checklist's specific instructions for what to gather, generally a file can be resolved in the docs folder, if not or unsure, halt and ask or confirm with the user.
3. **Checklist Processing**
If in interactive mode:
- Work through each section of the checklist one at a time
- For each section:
- Review all items in the section following instructions for that section embedded in the checklist
@@ -926,7 +912,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
- Get user confirmation before proceeding to next section or if any thing major do we need to halt and take corrective action
If in YOLO mode:
- Process all sections at once
- Create a comprehensive report of all findings
- Present the complete analysis to the user
@@ -934,7 +919,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
4. **Validation Approach**
For each checklist item:
- Read and understand the requirement
- Look for evidence in the documentation that satisfies the requirement
- Consider both explicit mentions and implicit coverage
@@ -948,7 +932,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
5. **Section Analysis**
For each section:
- think step by step to calculate pass rate
- Identify common themes in failed items
- Provide specific recommendations for improvement
@@ -958,7 +941,6 @@ If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists a
6. **Final Report**
Prepare a summary that includes:
- Overall checklist completion status
- Pass rates by section
- List of failed items with context
@@ -1075,13 +1057,11 @@ CRITICAL: Use proper parsing that understands markdown context. A ## inside a co
For each extracted section:
1. **Generate filename**: Convert the section heading to lowercase-dash-case
- Remove special characters
- Replace spaces with dashes
- Example: "## Tech Stack" → `tech-stack.md`
2. **Adjust heading levels**:
- The level 2 heading becomes level 1 (# instead of ##) in the sharded new document
- All subsection levels decrease by 1:
@@ -1966,7 +1946,6 @@ Ask the user if they want to work through the checklist:
Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
1. Executive Summary
- Overall PRD completeness (percentage)
- MVP scope appropriateness (Too Large/Just Right/Too Small)
- Readiness for architecture phase (Ready/Nearly Ready/Not Ready)
@@ -1974,26 +1953,22 @@ Create a comprehensive validation report that includes:
2. Category Analysis Table
Fill in the actual table with:
- Status: PASS (90%+ complete), PARTIAL (60-89%), FAIL (<60%)
- Critical Issues: Specific problems that block progress
3. Top Issues by Priority
- BLOCKERS: Must fix before architect can proceed
- HIGH: Should fix for quality
- MEDIUM: Would improve clarity
- LOW: Nice to have
4. MVP Scope Assessment
- Features that might be cut for true MVP
- Missing features that are essential
- Complexity concerns
- Timeline realism
5. Technical Readiness
- Clarity of technical constraints
- Identified technical risks
- Areas needing architect investigation