hash file change checking integrated

This commit is contained in:
Brian Madison
2025-09-30 21:20:13 -05:00
parent c42cd48421
commit 05a3b4f3f1
316 changed files with 354 additions and 38125 deletions

View File

@@ -1,203 +0,0 @@
# Project Planning Workflow
## Overview
Scale-adaptive project planning workflow that automatically adjusts outputs based on project scope - from single atomic changes (Level 0: tech-spec only) to enterprise platforms (Level 4: full PRD + epics). Generates appropriate planning artifacts for each level with intelligent routing and continuation support.
## Key Features
- **Scale-adaptive planning** - Automatically determines output based on project complexity
- **Intelligent routing** - Uses router system to load appropriate instruction sets
- **Continuation support** - Can resume from previous sessions and handle incremental work
- **Multi-level outputs** - Supports 5 project levels (0-4) with appropriate artifacts
- **Input integration** - Leverages product briefs and market research when available
- **Template-driven** - Uses validated templates for consistent output structure
## Usage
### Basic Invocation
```bash
workflow plan-project
```
### With Input Documents
```bash
# With product brief as input
workflow plan-project --input /path/to/product-brief.md
# With multiple inputs
workflow plan-project --input product-brief.md --input market-research.md
```
### Configuration
The workflow adapts automatically based on project assessment, but key configuration options include:
- **scale_parameters**: Defines story/epic counts for each project level
- **output_folder**: Where all generated documents are stored
- **project_name**: Used in document names and templates
## Workflow Structure
### Files Included
```
plan-project/
├── workflow.yaml # Configuration and metadata
├── instructions-router.md # Initial assessment and routing logic
├── instructions-sm.md # Level 0 instructions (tech-spec only)
├── instructions-med.md # Level 1-2 instructions (PRD + tech-spec)
├── instructions-lg.md # Level 3-4 instructions (full PRD + epics)
├── analysis-template.md # Project assessment template
├── prd-template.md # Product Requirements Document template
├── tech-spec-template.md # Technical Specification template
├── epics-template.md # Epic breakdown template
├── checklist.md # Validation criteria
└── README.md # This file
```
## Workflow Process
### Phase 1: Assessment and Routing (Steps 1-5)
- **Project Analysis**: Determines project type (greenfield/brownfield/legacy)
- **Scope Assessment**: Classifies into 5 levels based on complexity
- **Document Discovery**: Identifies existing inputs and documentation
- **Workflow Routing**: Loads appropriate instruction set based on level
- **Continuation Handling**: Resumes from previous work when applicable
### Phase 2: Level-Specific Planning (Steps vary by level)
**Level 0 (Single Atomic Change)**:
- Creates technical specification only
- Focuses on implementation details for small changes
**Level 1-2 (Features and Small Systems)**:
- Generates minimal PRD with core sections
- Creates comprehensive tech-spec
- Includes basic epic breakdown
**Level 3-4 (Full Products and Platforms)**:
- Produces complete PRD with all sections
- Generates detailed epic breakdown
- Includes architect handoff materials
- Creates traceability mapping
### Phase 3: Validation and Handoff (Final steps)
- **Document Review**: Validates outputs against checklists
- **Architect Preparation**: For Level 3-4, prepares handoff materials
- **Next Steps**: Provides guidance for development phase
## Output
### Generated Files
- **Primary output**: PRD.md (except Level 0), tech-spec.md, project-workflow-analysis.md
- **Supporting files**: epics.md (Level 3-4), PRD-validation-report.md (if validation run)
### Output Structure by Level
**Level 0 - Tech Spec Only**:
1. **Technical Overview** - Implementation approach
2. **Detailed Design** - Code-level specifications
3. **Testing Strategy** - Validation approach
**Level 1-2 - Minimal PRD + Tech Spec**:
1. **Problem Statement** - Core issue definition
2. **Solution Overview** - High-level approach
3. **Requirements** - Functional and non-functional
4. **Technical Specification** - Implementation details
5. **Success Criteria** - Acceptance criteria
**Level 3-4 - Full PRD + Epics**:
1. **Executive Summary** - Project overview
2. **Problem Definition** - Detailed problem analysis
3. **Solution Architecture** - Comprehensive solution design
4. **User Experience** - Journey mapping and wireframes
5. **Requirements** - Complete functional/non-functional specs
6. **Epic Breakdown** - Development phases and stories
7. **Technical Handoff** - Architecture and implementation guidance
## Requirements
- **Input Documents**: Product brief and/or market research (recommended but not required)
- **Project Configuration**: Valid config.yaml with project_name and output_folder
- **Assessment Readiness**: Clear understanding of project scope and objectives
## Best Practices
### Before Starting
1. **Gather Context**: Collect any existing product briefs, market research, or requirements
2. **Define Scope**: Have a clear sense of project boundaries and complexity
3. **Prepare Stakeholders**: Ensure key stakeholders are available for input if needed
### During Execution
1. **Be Honest About Scope**: Accurate assessment ensures appropriate planning depth
2. **Leverage Existing Work**: Reference previous documents and avoid duplication
3. **Think Incrementally**: Remember that planning can evolve - start with what you know
### After Completion
1. **Validate Against Checklist**: Use included validation criteria to ensure completeness
2. **Share with Stakeholders**: Distribute appropriate documents to relevant team members
3. **Prepare for Architecture**: For Level 3-4 projects, ensure architect has complete context
## Troubleshooting
### Common Issues
**Issue**: Workflow creates wrong level of documentation
- **Solution**: Review project assessment and restart with correct scope classification
- **Check**: Verify the project-workflow-analysis.md reflects actual project complexity
**Issue**: Missing input documents cause incomplete planning
- **Solution**: Gather recommended inputs or proceed with manual context gathering
- **Check**: Ensure critical business context is captured even without formal documents
**Issue**: Continuation from previous session fails
- **Solution**: Check for existing project-workflow-analysis.md and ensure output folder is correct
- **Check**: Verify previous session completed at a valid checkpoint
## Customization
To customize this workflow:
1. **Modify Assessment Logic**: Update instructions-router.md to adjust level classification
2. **Adjust Templates**: Customize PRD, tech-spec, or epic templates for organizational needs
3. **Add Validation**: Extend checklist.md with organization-specific quality criteria
4. **Configure Outputs**: Modify workflow.yaml to change file naming or structure
## Version History
- **v6.0.0** - Scale-adaptive architecture with intelligent routing
- Multi-level project support (0-4)
- Continuation and resumption capabilities
- Template-driven output generation
- Input document integration
## Support
For issues or questions:
- Review the workflow creation guide at `/bmad/bmb/workflows/create-workflow/workflow-creation-guide.md`
- Validate output using `checklist.md`
- Consult project assessment in `project-workflow-analysis.md`
- Check continuation status in existing output documents
---
_Part of the BMad Method v6 - BMM (Method) Module_