refactor: standardize formatting and improve readability across core documents (#211)
### CHANGES - Add newlines and spacing for improved readability - Standardize instructional text for consistency - Renumber lists within tasks for better clarity - Add language identifiers to various code blocks - Update placeholder text for improved consistency - Adjust descriptions and wording in multiple files - Update VS Code settings and dictionary words
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,23 +18,23 @@ This unified approach combines what would traditionally be separate backend and
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the PRD and other documents for mentions of:
|
||||
|
||||
- Fullstack starter templates (e.g., T3 Stack, MEAN/MERN starters, Django + React templates)
|
||||
- Monorepo templates (e.g., Nx, Turborepo starters)
|
||||
- Platform-specific starters (e.g., Vercel templates, AWS Amplify starters)
|
||||
- Existing projects being extended or cloned
|
||||
- Fullstack starter templates (e.g., T3 Stack, MEAN/MERN starters, Django + React templates)
|
||||
- Monorepo templates (e.g., Nx, Turborepo starters)
|
||||
- Platform-specific starters (e.g., Vercel templates, AWS Amplify starters)
|
||||
- Existing projects being extended or cloned
|
||||
|
||||
2. If starter templates or existing projects are mentioned:
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access (links, repos, or files)
|
||||
- Analyze to understand pre-configured choices and constraints
|
||||
- Note any architectural decisions already made
|
||||
- Identify what can be modified vs what must be retained
|
||||
- Ask the user to provide access (links, repos, or files)
|
||||
- Analyze to understand pre-configured choices and constraints
|
||||
- Note any architectural decisions already made
|
||||
- Identify what can be modified vs what must be retained
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no starter is mentioned but this is greenfield:
|
||||
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate fullstack starters based on tech preferences
|
||||
- Consider platform-specific options (Vercel, AWS, etc.)
|
||||
- Let user decide whether to use one
|
||||
- Suggest appropriate fullstack starters based on tech preferences
|
||||
- Consider platform-specific options (Vercel, AWS, etc.)
|
||||
- Let user decide whether to use one
|
||||
|
||||
4. Document the decision and any constraints it imposes
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -333,10 +333,12 @@ servers:
|
||||
2. Consider both frontend and backend components
|
||||
3. Define clear boundaries and interfaces between components
|
||||
4. For each component, specify:
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
- Primary responsibility
|
||||
- Key interfaces/APIs exposed
|
||||
- Dependencies on other components
|
||||
- Technology specifics based on tech stack choices
|
||||
|
||||
5. Create component diagrams where helpful
|
||||
6. After presenting all components, apply `tasks#advanced-elicitation` protocol]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user